AzTrials
AzTrials

ScarNCT03888703

The Use of Fractional Ablative CO2 Laser vs Control on Acute Traumatic Injuries to Prevent Scar Formation

A study testing Fractional ablative CO2 laser in people with Scar and Trauma Injury, run by Miami Dermatology and Laser Institute.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Surgical standard for treating traumatic burn injury scarring is to wait one year following the initial assault prior to beginning treatment. This study investigates the use of fractional ablative CO2 laser when begun within 3 months of a traumatic burn injury and it's impact on scar formation compared to the control. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Scar, Trauma Injury, Burns
What is being tested?
Fractional ablative CO2 laser
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
19 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
4 May 2015to 5 May 2017
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Subject is between 18 and 80 years of age with burn injuries suffered within the prior 3 months
  • Subject is a healthy Male or Female
  • Fitzpatrick Skin Type I - IV
  • Subject must have moderate - severe burn damage of sufficient bilateral area involving either the face, trunk, arms or legs
  • Subject must be able to read, understand and sign the Informed Consent Form
  • Subject must be willing and able to adhere to the treatment and follow-up schedule and post-treatment care instructions
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Subject must be willing to have limited sun exposure for the duration of the study, including the follow-up period
  • Subject is willing to have photographs taken of the treated area which will be used de-identified in evaluations and may be used de-identified in presentations and/or publications
  • For female candidates - they may be post-menopausal, surgically sterilized, or using a medically acceptable form of birth control during the entire course of the study.
  • Female candidates with child bearing potential - willing to take pregnancy test and result must be negative.

Who cannot join

  • Subject is less than 18 or greater than 80 years of age.
  • Subject has Fitzpatrick Skin Type V - VI
  • Subject is Pregnant or planning to become pregnant during the study duration
  • Subject is breast feeding during the study duration
  • Subject has an active skin infection, dermatitis or a rash in the treatment area
  • Subject has a history of immunosuppression/immune deficiency disorders or currently using immunosuppressive medications
Show all 18Show fewer
  • Subject has a known bleeding disorder
  • Subject has a known photosensitivity to the study laser wavelength, history of ingesting medications known to induce photosensitivity, or history of seizure disorders due to light.
  • Subject has a known collagen, vascular disease or scleroderma
  • Subject has undergone any surgery or other procedures in the treatment area within 6 months of treatment which are still healing.
  • Subject is suffering from significant concurrent illness, such as insulin-dependent diabetes, peripheral vascular disease or peripheral neuropathy
  • Subject is undergoing systemic chemotherapy for the treatment of cancer
  • Subject has lesions suspicious for malignancy
  • The systemic use of isotretinoin (Accutane®) or other retinoid derivatives within 6 months of study participation
  • Any use of gold therapy for disorders such as rheumatologic disease or lupus
  • The subject is excessively tanned in areas to be treated or unable/unlikely to refrain from tanning during the study
  • The subject has participated in a study of another device or drug within three months prior to enrollment or during the study.
  • As per the Investigator's discretion, any physical or mental condition which might make it unsafe for the subject to participate in this study

About this study

Official title: Early Intervention of Fractional Ablative CO2 Laser With or Without 830 nm LED Phototherapy for Acute Burn Injuries

Surgical standard for treating traumatic burn injury scarring is to wait one year following the initial assault prior to beginning treatment. This study investigates the use of fractional ablative CO2 laser when begun within 3 months of a traumatic burn injury and it's impact on scar formation compared to the control. We hypothesized that early intervention would substantially mitigate the formation of scar tissue and help restore more normal appearing skin.

Being tested
Fractional ablative CO2 laser
Keywords
early laser intervention, scar prevention, laser resurfacing, wound healing
Medical subject headings
Cicatrix, Accidental Injuries, Burns

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Fractional ablative CO2 laserDevice

    Three treatments with a fractional ablative CO2 laser 8 weeks apart

Study groups in NCT03888703
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
TreatmentExperimentalNot described
Receives: Device: Fractional ablative CO2 laser
ControlNo interventionNot described

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Manchester Scar Scale

    The sum total of the Manchester Scar Scale to assess the change in scar characteristics. The scale includes the following categories: Color, matte vs shiny, contour, distortion, and texture. Scales for color, contour, distortion, and texture are rated on a 1-4 scale with 1 being most normal and 4 being most abnormal. Matte vs shiny is rated on a 1 to 2 scale with 1 being matte and 2 being shiny. Assessments completed by blinded evaluators. A decrease in score indicates improvement in scar characteristics.

    Measured: From the day of the first treatment prior to intervention and at 6 months following the final treatment

  2. Digital photography

    Visual improvement as demonstrated in digital photography. Before and after photos identified by blinded evaluators

    Measured: From the day of the first treatment prior to intervention and at 6 months following the final treatment

  3. Changes in scar characteristics such as dermal and epidermal character as well as vascular structure and organization assessed through histology.

    Some patients elected to do optional biopsies for deeper evaluation of changes in skin structure. Biopsies were taken prior to treatment and 6 months following treatment to assess dermal and epidermal character as well as the size and organization of vasculature. Evaluation was done qualitatively.

    Measured: From the day of the first treatment prior to intervention and at 6 months following the final treatment

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Optical Coherence Tomography

    Patients were scanned using OCT for noninvasive skin imaging of both control and treatment areas

    Measured: From the day of the first treatment prior to intervention and at 6 months following the final treatment

  2. Treatment Time

    The total duration of each treatment was measured in minutes to assess treatment characteristics for large surface areas

    Measured: Treatment time was measured at each of the three treatments conducted on day 0, day 60, and day 120

  3. Severity of post treatment cutaneous responses as evaluated by the investigator

    Cutaneous responses including purpura, edema, erythema, hyperpigmentation, hypopigmentation, blistering and scarring were assessed following each treatment. Areas were rated on a 1-4 scale where 1 = none, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, and 4 = severe.

    Measured: Post treatment response was assessed immediately post treatment at each of the three treatments conducted on day 0, day 60, and day 120

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted25 Mar 2019
  2. Study start4 May 2015
  3. Primary completion5 May 2017
  4. Study completion5 May 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Each subject possessed extensive burn wounds. Wounds on each subject were divided into treatment arms of intervention with fractional ablative CO2 laser and control.
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
19 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03888703
Sponsor's protocol ID
SAIRB-13-0045
Status last verified
Mar 2019
First submitted
6 Mar 2019
Last updated
25 Mar 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Waibel JS, Gianatasio C, Rudnick A. Randomized, Controlled Early Intervention of Dynamic Mode Fractional Ablative CO2 Laser on Acute Burn Injuries for Prevention of Pathological Scarring. Lasers Surg Med. 2020 Feb;52(2):117-124. doi: 10.1002/lsm.23170. Epub 2019 Oct 20.

    PubMed 31631361

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Fractional ablative CO2 laser in people with Scar and Trauma Injury, run by Miami Dermatology and Laser Institute.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 18 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Mar 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Manchester Scar Scale (time frame: From the day of the first treatment prior to intervention and at 6 months following the final treatment). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03888703, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Mar 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in