Lung CancerPROFILESNCT03888937
bnP for pRediction of Outcome FollowIng Lung rEsection Surgery
An observational study of Lung Cancer, run by University of Glasgow at 1 site in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
Can BNP be used alongside current risk prediction methods to more accurately identify those at risk of breathlessness and poor quality of life following lung resection? Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 16 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Lung Cancer
- How many people
- 250 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- 1 Oct 2018to 1 Oct 2020
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 16 years and older
- All sexes
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Study population: With informed consent, BNP blood levels will be measured before and after lung resection in 250 patients at 4 hospitals across the UK. We will target 100 patient recruitment at the Golden Jubilee and 50 from the other 3 centres involved which are Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Edinburgh Royal Infirmary and Belfast Royal Infirmary.
Who may be able to join
- Provision of informed consent
- Age >16 years
- Planned elective lobectomy/pneumonectomy lung resection by VATS or thoracotomy.
Who cannot join
- Pregnancy
- On-going participation in any investigational research which could undermine the scientific basis of the study
- Conditions that increase BNP artificially such as sepsis, cirrhosis, colon cancer and any intracranial pathologies (see definitions below)
- MRC score > 2 pre-operatively
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United Kingdom1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Golden Jubilee National Hospital
Glasgow, g81 4dy
Brian Lafferty, MBChB, 0141 951 5000, brian.lafferty@nhs.net
Ben Shelley, MBChB, ben.shelley@glasgow.ac.uk
About this study
Can BNP be used alongside current risk prediction methods to more accurately identify those at risk of breathlessness and poor quality of life following lung resection?
Read the detailed description
Lung cancer is the second most common type of cancer in the UK and the leading cause of cancer related death. Surgery to remove the tumour and the surrounding lung (lung resection) often provides the best chance of cure. Frequently, patients are smokers with related lung or heart problems increasing the risks associated with surgery. Whilst surgery for lung cancer is considered the best chance of 'cure', patients may suffer long term breathlessness, lowering quality of life. This is important; public engagement work we have performed demonstrates repeatedly that second only to "being alive and cancer free" exercise capacity is the main priority of post-operative patients.
Prediction of breathlessness is difficult and not solely caused by lung removal but also from decreased performance of the heart. Although the surgery does not directly involve the heart, it is thought the damage is caused indirectly by the surgery and by removal of part of the lung. Current methods for predicting the risk of breathlessness after surgery are inaccurate. Some patients are refused surgery based on these methods yet may have had successful surgery. Furthermore, no specific treatment exists for patients considered to be at increased risk of breathlessness.
By identifying patients at risk of breathlessness, we believe an opportunity exists to intervene. A small study we completed (a 'pilot study') suggests measuring a hormone called 'BNP' (B type- natriuretic peptide, released by the heart) will improve prediction of post-operative breathlessness.
With informed consent, BNP blood levels will be measured before and after lung resection in 250 patients at 4 hospitals across the UK. We will target 100 patient recruitment at the Golden Jubilee and 50 from the other 3 centres involved. Validated questionnaires will be distributed following surgery measuring breathlessness and quality of life and returned via post at three months and at one year. Questionnaires were selected via patient and public involvement to represent what matters most to patients following surgery. This data will be integrated into current scoring systems to prove it increases identification of patients who will suffer from breathlessness and poor quality of life following surgery. Creation and testing of a risk prediction tool, or 'score', requires complex statistical techniques; we are therefore working alongside specialist biostatisticians.
We hypothesise post-operative cardiac dysfunction significantly contributes to postoperative dyspnoea and a window of opportunity exists peri-operatively where targeted interventions could improve outcome. In this study, by incorporating BNP measurement into clinical risk prediction of post-operative dyspnoea in patients undergoing lung resection surgery can we improve prediction of a poor functional outcome?
- Conditions
- Lung Cancer
- Medical subject headings
- Lung Neoplasms
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Shortness of Breath
Modified MRC score.
Measured: 3 months
Secondary outcomes (1)
Quality of life using quality of life questionnaire
EQ-5D Qol questionnaire
Measured: 3 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 Mar 2019
- Study start1 Oct 2018
- Primary completionMar 2020 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Oct 2020 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Lung CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 250 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Glasgow
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Dr Ben Shelley, University of Glasgow
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03888937
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 0.6 18/LO/1563
- Acronym
- PROFILES
- Status last verified
- Mar 2019
- First submitted
- 20 Feb 2019
- Last updated
- 25 Mar 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 25 Mar 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- bnP for pRediction of Outcome FollowIng Lung rEsection Surgery
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03888937
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PROFILES / 0.6 18/LO/1563
- Conditions
- Lung Cancer
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 250 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of GlasgowUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Oct 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Mar 2020 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Oct 2020 (estimated)
- First posted
- 25 Mar 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Can BNP be used alongside current risk prediction methods to more accurately identify those at risk of breathlessness and poor quality of life following lung resection?
Detailed description
Lung cancer is the second most common type of cancer in the UK and the leading cause of cancer related death. Surgery to remove the tumour and the surrounding lung (lung resection) often provides the best chance of cure. Frequently, patients are smokers with related lung or heart problems increasing the risks associated with surgery. Whilst surgery for lung cancer is considered the best chance of 'cure', patients may suffer long term breathlessness, lowering quality of life. This is important; public engagement work we have performed demonstrates repeatedly that second only to "being alive and cancer free" exercise capacity is the main priority of post-operative patients.
Prediction of breathlessness is difficult and not solely caused by lung removal but also from decreased performance of the heart. Although the surgery does not directly involve the heart, it is thought the damage is caused indirectly by the surgery and by removal of part of the lung. Current methods for predicting the risk of breathlessness after surgery are inaccurate. Some patients are refused surgery based on these methods yet may have had successful surgery. Furthermore, no specific treatment exists for patients considered to be at increased risk of breathlessness.
By identifying patients at risk of breathlessness, we believe an opportunity exists to intervene. A small study we completed (a 'pilot study') suggests measuring a hormone called 'BNP' (B type- natriuretic peptide, released by the heart) will improve prediction of post-operative breathlessness.
With informed consent, BNP blood levels will be measured before and after lung resection in 250 patients at 4 hospitals across the UK. We will target 100 patient recruitment at the Golden Jubilee and 50 from the other 3 centres involved. Validated questionnaires will be distributed following surgery measuring breathlessness and quality of life and returned via post at three months and at one year. Questionnaires were selected via patient and public involvement to represent what matters most to patients following surgery. This data will be integrated into current scoring systems to prove it increases identification of patients who will suffer from breathlessness and poor quality of life following surgery. Creation and testing of a risk prediction tool, or 'score', requires complex statistical techniques; we are therefore working alongside specialist biostatisticians.
We hypothesise post-operative cardiac dysfunction significantly contributes to postoperative dyspnoea and a window of opportunity exists peri-operatively where targeted interventions could improve outcome. In this study, by incorporating BNP measurement into clinical risk prediction of post-operative dyspnoea in patients undergoing lung resection surgery can we improve prediction of a poor functional outcome?
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 16 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- With informed consent, BNP blood levels will be measured before and after lung resection in 250 patients at 4 hospitals across the UK. We will target 100 patient recruitment at the Golden Jubilee and 50 from the other 3 centres involved which are Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Edinburgh Royal Infirmary and Belfast Royal Infirmary.
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Provision of informed consent
- Age >16 years
- Planned elective lobectomy/pneumonectomy lung resection by VATS or thoracotomy.
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Pregnancy
- On-going participation in any investigational research which could undermine the scientific basis of the study
- Conditions that increase BNP artificially such as sepsis, cirrhosis, colon cancer and any intracranial pathologies (see definitions below)
- MRC score > 2 pre-operatively
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Shortness of Breath
Time frame: 3 months
Modified MRC score.
1 secondary outcome
Quality of life using quality of life questionnaire
Time frame: 3 months
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 25 Mar 2019.
Related trials for Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
A Prospective ,Multicenter ,Non-interventional ,Real-world Study Observing Changes in Molecular Markers Osimertinib Targeted Therapy in EGFRm NSCLC
Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study Evaluating Sotorasib Platinum Doublet Combination Versus Pembrolizumab Platinum Doublet Combination as a Front-Line Therapy in Participants With Stage IV or Advanced Stage IIIB/C Nonsquamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers (CodeBreaK 202)
Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Datopotamab Deruxtecan (Dato-DXd, DS-1062a) in Advanced and/or Unresectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Metastatic Lung Cancer, Advanced Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Lung Cancer, run by University of Glasgow at 1 site in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Mar 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Dr B Lafferty, MBChB (0141 951 5000, brian.lafferty@nhs.net), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Shortness of Breath (time frame: 3 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Mar 2019.