Small Fiber NeuropathyNCT03889080
fMRI-study in Patients With Small Fiber Neuropathy
An observational study of Small Fiber Neuropathy, run by Academisch Ziekenhuis Maastricht at 1 site in Netherlands.
Trial summary
Small fiber neuropathy (SFN) is a form of peripheral neuropathy, which is characterized by neuropathic pain and autonomic dysfunction. Mutations in SCN9A, the gene encoding for the voltage-gated sodium channel NaV1.7, are associated with SFN. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Small Fiber Neuropathy
- What is being tested?
- functional MRI
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 1 siteNetherlands
- Study dates
- 5 Oct 2018to Dec 2023
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients can only participate when they are living in the Netherlands.
Who may be able to join
- Patient group (SCN9A-associated SFN)
- Male and/or female subjects between the ages of 18 and 80 years.
- Presence of a clinical diagnosis of SFN, according to international criteria, and presence of confirmed abnormality on intra-epidermal nerve fiber density evaluation (IENFD) and/or Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST).
- A mutation in the SCN9A gene, confirmed by sequencing, with possible, probable or certain pathogenicity according to international criteria.
- Presence of pain due to SFN for at least 3 months and an average self-reported pain score of at least 5.
- Subjects must give informed consent by signing and dating an informed consent form.
Show all 15Show fewer
- Patient group (SFN without a gene mutation):
- Male and/or female subjects between the ages of 18 and 80 years.
- Presence of a clinical diagnosis of SFN, according to international criteria, including a decreased intra-epidermal nerve fiber density IENFD in skin biopsy.
- No mutation in the SCN9A, SCN10A or SCN11A gene, confirmed by sequencing.
- Presence of pain due to SFN for at least 3 months and an average self-reported pain score of at least 5.
- Subjects must give informed consent by signing and dating an informed consent form.
- Control group
- Male and/or female subjects between the ages of 18 and 80 years.
- Subjects must give informed consent by signing and dating an informed consent form
Who cannot join
- For all groups:
- Major depression according to DSM-V criteria or a history of major psychiatric disease.
- (History of) alcohol abuse
- HADS ≥ 14
- Subjects who have another pain syndrome than small fiber neuropathy.
- Contraindications for undergoing MRI: pacemaker, metallic foreign body (including aneurysm clip in the brain), claustrophobia, pregnancy, neurostimulator, pacemaker or other kinds of implanted devices or insulin pump. In case of cardiac valve replacement of ossicular replacement prosthesis the radiologist will be consulted.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Netherlands1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Maastricht University Medical Center
Maastricht
Catharina G Faber, MD, PhD, +31433877059, c.faber@mumc.nl
About this study
Official title: Central Pain Location in SCN9A-associated SFN, an fMRI Pilot Study.
Small fiber neuropathy (SFN) is a form of peripheral neuropathy, which is characterized by neuropathic pain and autonomic dysfunction. Mutations in SCN9A, the gene encoding for the voltage-gated sodium channel NaV1.7, are associated with SFN. SCN9A-associated SFN often results in chronic neuropathic pain, which is difficult to treat. Chronic neuropathic pain may cause structural and functional changes in the brain. Until now, only one small study examined the structural and functional changes of the brain in SFN patients. No studies have been performed in strictly defined SFN patients.
Therefore, it would be interesting to explore whether in SFN patients with an SCN9A mutation, the genotype will lead to a distinct brain activation pattern on functional MRI (fMRI) and if the integrity or structural connectivity of the brain is altered using diffusion tensor imaging (DTI). This may provide a better understanding of the pathophysiological pathways for chronic pain and might serve as a biomarker for evaluating therapy.
The objective of this study is to explore whether there is an indication whether patients with SCN9A-associated SFN have an abnormal brain activation pattern on resting state fMRI and during advanced thermal stimulation and altered structural connectivity on DTI versus SFN patients without a mutation and versus age- and gender-matched healthy controls. With this knowledge, objective pain measurement for patients with SFN may serve as a biomarker in evaluating efficacy of targeted therapy.
Read the detailed description
Small fiber neuropathy (SFN) is a form of peripheral neuropathy, which is characterized by neuropathic pain and autonomic dysfunction. It is caused by dysfunction of the Aδ-fibers and C-fibers. SFN is diagnosed if typical SFN symptoms are present, in combination with an additional abnormal skin biopsy and/or abnormal quantitative sensory testing. The minimal prevalence of SFN is estimated to be 53/100.000. SFN has a comprehensive list of causes. The etiology encompasses metabolic, toxic, auto immune, infectious, and hereditable causes. Mutations in SCN9A, the gene encoding for the voltage-gated sodium channel NaV1.7, are associated with SFN, and can be found in 10-15% of SFN patients. The symptomatic treatment of SFN is generally disappointing. Until now, antidepressants and anticonvulsants are mostly recommended for SFN with limited pain reduction, often leading to chronic daily pain experience. Understanding the pathophysiology of pain and identifying plausible specific pain genotype-phenotype relations, might lead to improved treatment strategies. Therefore, the focus should extend beyond the scope of peripheral mechanisms of the nervous system and should include searching for pain complex central, thus brain based, mechanisms and patterns (a pain network of somatosensory, limbic and associate structures).
The International Association for the Study of Pain defined pain as 'an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience associated with actual or potential tissue damage, or described in terms of such damage'. A painful stimulus activates the peripheral nociceptors and is transmitted through the small fibers, via the dorsal horn in the spinal cord, to the brain. Pain stimuli are processed in the cortex, subcortical structures, and the midbrain. In the cortical area the somatosensory, anterior cingulate, prefrontal, and insular cortex are the most important structures, whereas important subcortical areas encompass the hippocampus, basal ganglia, amygdala, and thalamus. Furthermore, the cerebellum is suggested as an important area contributing to pain sensation.
Chronic pain may lead to structural changes in the brain, and imaging revealed morphological alterations in gray matter (both an increase and a decrease). The pattern of alterations may differ among different pain syndromes and may be reversible.
Functional imaging studies have displayed specific brain activity patterns in patients with different types of pain syndromes. Recently, also in a small SFN patients study functional connectivity changes using a 3.0 Tesla scanner were shown. However, whether a specific activation pattern can be seen depends on many factors, such as type of brain imaging modality.7 It is conceivable that a particular type of pain (stimulus) may enhance a specific pain brain pattern, but also specific person factors (for example gender and genetic factors) may influence the pain activation network. Psychological modulation as well as chronicity of pain may influence the activation network, and should therefore be taken into account. Furthermore the specific location of pain can display different kinds of patterns because of partially somatotopic organization, such as described in the S1 cortex. To date, in human no functional imaging studies using a 7.0 Tesla fMRI-scan have been performed.
Until now, an objective tool to measure pain is lacking. Most studies in pain syndromes including patients with SFN have been using a great variety of surrogate pain scales, such as the Visual Analogue Pain Scale (VAS), the Pain Intensity Numerical Rating Scale, the Brief Pain Inventory and the Neuropathic pain scale (NPS). Therefore, an objective measure for pain would be a great advantage.
In this study, patients with a SCN9A-associated SFN will be analyzed to determine possible central nervous system pain network patterns. The voltage-gated sodium channel NaV1.7 plays a central role in pain processing. Research in rats revealed areas of the brain that express Nav1.7 channels. These channels were restricted to the hypothalamic/preoptic area, brain stem, and the subfornical organ. Our goal is to examine whether gain-of-function mutations in NaV1.7 may lead to a specific pain pattern in the human brain by scanning with a 3.0 Tesla fMRI-scan. Some patients will be included to undergo an extra fMRI-brain scan (Tesla 7.0). Due to the high field strength, new opportunities have arisen for brain imaging. The newly acquired ultra high resolution facilitates the possibility of more detailed anatomical imaging. When the 7.0 Tesla fMRI-scan appears to yield more useful information than the 3.0 Tesla fMRI-scan, the first-mentioned will be used for follow-up studies.
The aim of this study is to determine the resting state and the effect on heat stimuli of patients with SCN9A-associated SFN on fMRI and the changes in structural connectivity using diffusion tensor imaging (DTI). This may provide a better understanding of the pathophysiological pathways for chronic pain. If successful, fMRI/DTI might be an additional tool as biomarker for evaluating therapy, and may contribute in the evaluation of novel therapeutic strategies.
- Conditions
- Small Fiber Neuropathy
- Being tested
- functional MRI
- Keywords
- functional MRI, fMRI, pain
- Medical subject headings
- Small Fiber Neuropathy, Pain
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
functional MRIDiagnostic test
functional MRI scan of the brain
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| SCN9A-group | Patients with SCN9A-associated small fiber neuropathy Receives: Diagnostic Test: functional MRI | |
| Skin biopsy | Patients with SFN confirmed with a decreased intra-epidermal nerve fiber density (IENFD) Receives: Diagnostic Test: functional MRI | |
| Control | Age- and gender-matched healthy controls Receives: Diagnostic Test: functional MRI |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
BOLD during heat stimulation
BOLD (blood-oxygen-level dependent) signal in 3 study cohorts (individuals with SCN9A mutation with small fiber neuropathy, individual with SCN9A mutation without small fiber neuropathy and matched, healthy controls) during heat stimulation. [ Time Frame: 1 day, single timepoint] Difference in BOLD signal measured by functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) between study cohorts in primary somatosensory cortex, thalamus, dorsal striatum and ventral striatum.
Measured: Once (1 day)
BOLD during cold stimulations
BOLD (blood-oxygen-level dependent) signal in 3 study cohorts (individuals with SCN9A mutation with small fiber neuropathy, individual with SCN9A mutation without small fiber neuropathy and matched, healthy controls) during cold stimulation. [ Time Frame: 1 day, single timepoint] Difference in BOLD signal measured by functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) between study cohorts in primary somatosensory cortex, thalamus, dorsal striatum, and ventral striatum.
Measured: Once (1 day)
Secondary outcomes (2)
Resting state
Resting state functional connectivity signal in 3 study cohorts (individuals with SCN9A mutation with small fiber neuropathy, individual with SCN9A mutation without small fiber neuropathy and matched, healthy controls) [Time Frame: 1 day, single timepoint]
Difference in resting-state functional connectivity strength measured by functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) between study cohorts in default-mode, sensorimotor and salience networks.
Measured: Once (1 day)
Fractional anisotropy
Fractional anisotropy in 3 study cohorts (individuals with SCN9A mutation with small fiber neuropathy, individual with SCN9A mutation without small fiber neuropathy and matched, healthy controls) [Time Frame: 1 day, single timepoint]
Difference in fractional anisotropy measured by diffusion tensor imaging and tract based spatial statistics between study cohorts. Whole brain analysis will be performed.
Measured: Once (1 day)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 Mar 2019
- Study start5 Oct 2018
- Primary completionDec 2023 (estimated)
- Study completionDec 2023 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Small Fiber NeuropathyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Academisch Ziekenhuis Maastricht
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Harvard University
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Catharina G. Faber, Academisch Ziekenhuis Maastricht
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03889080
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- fMRI-SFN
- Status last verified
- Jul 2022
- First submitted
- 21 Nov 2018
- Last updated
- 26 Jul 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
van Gool R, Far A, Drenthen GS, Jansen JFA, Goijen CP, Backes WH, Linden DEJ, Merkies ISJ, Faber CG, Upadhyay J, Hoeijmakers JGJ. Peripheral Pain Captured Centrally: Altered Brain Morphology on MRI in Small Fiber Neuropathy Patients With and Without an SCN9A Gene Variant. J Pain. 2024 Mar;25(3):730-741. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2023.10.002. Epub 2023 Nov 3.
PubMed 37921732
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 26 Jul 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Central Pain Location in SCN9A-associated SFN, an fMRI Pilot Study.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03889080
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- fMRI-SFN
- Conditions
- Small Fiber Neuropathy
- Keywords
- functional MRI, fMRI, pain
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Academisch Ziekenhuis MaastrichtUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Harvard University
- Study start
- 5 Oct 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Dec 2023 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Dec 2023 (estimated)
- First posted
- 26 Mar 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Small fiber neuropathy (SFN) is a form of peripheral neuropathy, which is characterized by neuropathic pain and autonomic dysfunction. Mutations in SCN9A, the gene encoding for the voltage-gated sodium channel NaV1.7, are associated with SFN. SCN9A-associated SFN often results in chronic neuropathic pain, which is difficult to treat. Chronic neuropathic pain may cause structural and functional changes in the brain. Until now, only one small study examined the structural and functional changes of the brain in SFN patients. No studies have been performed in strictly defined SFN patients.
Therefore, it would be interesting to explore whether in SFN patients with an SCN9A mutation, the genotype will lead to a distinct brain activation pattern on functional MRI (fMRI) and if the integrity or structural connectivity of the brain is altered using diffusion tensor imaging (DTI). This may provide a better understanding of the pathophysiological pathways for chronic pain and might serve as a biomarker for evaluating therapy.
The objective of this study is to explore whether there is an indication whether patients with SCN9A-associated SFN have an abnormal brain activation pattern on resting state fMRI and during advanced thermal stimulation and altered structural connectivity on DTI versus SFN patients without a mutation and versus age- and gender-matched healthy controls. With this knowledge, objective pain measurement for patients with SFN may serve as a biomarker in evaluating efficacy of targeted therapy.
Detailed description
Small fiber neuropathy (SFN) is a form of peripheral neuropathy, which is characterized by neuropathic pain and autonomic dysfunction. It is caused by dysfunction of the Aδ-fibers and C-fibers. SFN is diagnosed if typical SFN symptoms are present, in combination with an additional abnormal skin biopsy and/or abnormal quantitative sensory testing. The minimal prevalence of SFN is estimated to be 53/100.000. SFN has a comprehensive list of causes. The etiology encompasses metabolic, toxic, auto immune, infectious, and hereditable causes. Mutations in SCN9A, the gene encoding for the voltage-gated sodium channel NaV1.7, are associated with SFN, and can be found in 10-15% of SFN patients. The symptomatic treatment of SFN is generally disappointing. Until now, antidepressants and anticonvulsants are mostly recommended for SFN with limited pain reduction, often leading to chronic daily pain experience. Understanding the pathophysiology of pain and identifying plausible specific pain genotype-phenotype relations, might lead to improved treatment strategies. Therefore, the focus should extend beyond the scope of peripheral mechanisms of the nervous system and should include searching for pain complex central, thus brain based, mechanisms and patterns (a pain network of somatosensory, limbic and associate structures).
The International Association for the Study of Pain defined pain as 'an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience associated with actual or potential tissue damage, or described in terms of such damage'. A painful stimulus activates the peripheral nociceptors and is transmitted through the small fibers, via the dorsal horn in the spinal cord, to the brain. Pain stimuli are processed in the cortex, subcortical structures, and the midbrain. In the cortical area the somatosensory, anterior cingulate, prefrontal, and insular cortex are the most important structures, whereas important subcortical areas encompass the hippocampus, basal ganglia, amygdala, and thalamus. Furthermore, the cerebellum is suggested as an important area contributing to pain sensation.
Chronic pain may lead to structural changes in the brain, and imaging revealed morphological alterations in gray matter (both an increase and a decrease). The pattern of alterations may differ among different pain syndromes and may be reversible.
Functional imaging studies have displayed specific brain activity patterns in patients with different types of pain syndromes. Recently, also in a small SFN patients study functional connectivity changes using a 3.0 Tesla scanner were shown. However, whether a specific activation pattern can be seen depends on many factors, such as type of brain imaging modality.7 It is conceivable that a particular type of pain (stimulus) may enhance a specific pain brain pattern, but also specific person factors (for example gender and genetic factors) may influence the pain activation network. Psychological modulation as well as chronicity of pain may influence the activation network, and should therefore be taken into account. Furthermore the specific location of pain can display different kinds of patterns because of partially somatotopic organization, such as described in the S1 cortex. To date, in human no functional imaging studies using a 7.0 Tesla fMRI-scan have been performed.
Until now, an objective tool to measure pain is lacking. Most studies in pain syndromes including patients with SFN have been using a great variety of surrogate pain scales, such as the Visual Analogue Pain Scale (VAS), the Pain Intensity Numerical Rating Scale, the Brief Pain Inventory and the Neuropathic pain scale (NPS). Therefore, an objective measure for pain would be a great advantage.
In this study, patients with a SCN9A-associated SFN will be analyzed to determine possible central nervous system pain network patterns. The voltage-gated sodium channel NaV1.7 plays a central role in pain processing. Research in rats revealed areas of the brain that express Nav1.7 channels. These channels were restricted to the hypothalamic/preoptic area, brain stem, and the subfornical organ. Our goal is to examine whether gain-of-function mutations in NaV1.7 may lead to a specific pain pattern in the human brain by scanning with a 3.0 Tesla fMRI-scan. Some patients will be included to undergo an extra fMRI-brain scan (Tesla 7.0). Due to the high field strength, new opportunities have arisen for brain imaging. The newly acquired ultra high resolution facilitates the possibility of more detailed anatomical imaging. When the 7.0 Tesla fMRI-scan appears to yield more useful information than the 3.0 Tesla fMRI-scan, the first-mentioned will be used for follow-up studies.
The aim of this study is to determine the resting state and the effect on heat stimuli of patients with SCN9A-associated SFN on fMRI and the changes in structural connectivity using diffusion tensor imaging (DTI). This may provide a better understanding of the pathophysiological pathways for chronic pain. If successful, fMRI/DTI might be an additional tool as biomarker for evaluating therapy, and may contribute in the evaluation of novel therapeutic strategies.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| SCN9A-group | – | Diagnostic Test: functional MRIPatients with SCN9A-associated small fiber neuropathy |
| Skin biopsy | – | Diagnostic Test: functional MRIPatients with SFN confirmed with a decreased intra-epidermal nerve fiber density (IENFD) |
| Control | – | Diagnostic Test: functional MRIAge- and gender-matched healthy controls |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients can only participate when they are living in the Netherlands.
Key inclusion criteria (15 listed)
- Patient group (SCN9A-associated SFN)
- Male and/or female subjects between the ages of 18 and 80 years.
- Presence of a clinical diagnosis of SFN, according to international criteria, and presence of confirmed abnormality on intra-epidermal nerve fiber density evaluation (IENFD) and/or Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST).
- A mutation in the SCN9A gene, confirmed by sequencing, with possible, probable or certain pathogenicity according to international criteria.
- Presence of pain due to SFN for at least 3 months and an average self-reported pain score of at least 5.
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Major depression according to DSM-V criteria or a history of major psychiatric disease.
- (History of) alcohol abuse
- HADS ≥ 14
- Subjects who have another pain syndrome than small fiber neuropathy.
- Contraindications for undergoing MRI: pacemaker, metallic foreign body (including aneurysm clip in the brain), claustrophobia, pregnancy, neurostimulator, pacemaker or other kinds of implanted devices or insulin pump. In case of cardiac valve replacement of ossicular replacement prosthesis the radiologist will be consulted.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| functional MRIfunctional MRI scan of the brain | Diagnostic test | Control, SCN9A-group, Skin biopsy |
Primary outcome
BOLD during heat stimulation
Time frame: Once (1 day)
BOLD (blood-oxygen-level dependent) signal in 3 study cohorts (individuals with SCN9A mutation with small fiber neuropathy, individual with SCN9A mutation without small fiber neuropathy and matched, healthy controls) during heat stimulation. [ Time Frame: 1 day, single timepoint] Difference in BOLD signal measured by functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) between study cohorts in primary somatosensory cortex, thalamus, dorsal striatum and ventral striatum.
BOLD during cold stimulations
Time frame: Once (1 day)
BOLD (blood-oxygen-level dependent) signal in 3 study cohorts (individuals with SCN9A mutation with small fiber neuropathy, individual with SCN9A mutation without small fiber neuropathy and matched, healthy controls) during cold stimulation. [ Time Frame: 1 day, single timepoint] Difference in BOLD signal measured by functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) between study cohorts in primary somatosensory cortex, thalamus, dorsal striatum, and ventral striatum.
2 secondary outcomes
Resting state
Time frame: Once (1 day)
Fractional anisotropy
Time frame: Once (1 day)
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 26 Jul 2022.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37921732van Gool R, Far A, Drenthen GS, Jansen JFA, Goijen CP, Backes WH, Linden DEJ, Merkies ISJ, Faber CG, Upadhyay J, Hoeijmakers JGJ. Peripheral Pain Captured Centrally: Altered Brain Morphology on MRI in Small Fiber Neuropathy Patients With and Without an SCN9A Gene Variant. J Pain. 2024 Mar;25(3):730-741. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2023.10.002. Epub 2023 Nov 3.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Small Fiber Neuropathy
Recruiting
Evaluation of the Prevalence, and Immunological Characteristics of Small Fiber Neuropathy in Patients With Primary Sjögren's Syndrome
Sjögren's Syndrome, Small Fiber Neuropathy
Recruiting
Magnetic Brain Stimulation in Small Fiber Neuropathy
Small Fiber Neuropathy
Recruiting
Spinal Cord Stimulation and Small Fiber Peripheral Neuropathy
Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Effect of Tirzepatide on Diabetic Peripheral Sensorimotor Neuropathy
Neuropathy, Small Fiber, Diabete Mellitus
Enrolling by invitation
Pilot Study to Evaluate Changes in Intra-Epidermal Nerve Fiber Density (IENFD) in Patients With Small-Fiber Neuropathy
Small Fiber Neuropathy
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Small Fiber Neuropathy, run by Academisch Ziekenhuis Maastricht at 1 site in Netherlands.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 15 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Jul 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Each site lists its own contact: choose the nearest one under Trial locations. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
BOLD during heat stimulation (time frame: Once (1 day)). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03889080, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Jul 2022.