AzTrials
AzTrials

Psoriatic ArthritisPhase 3BE OPTIMALNCT03895203

A Study to Test the Efficacy and Safety of Bimekizumab in the Treatment of Subjects With Active Psoriatic Arthritis

A Phase 3 study testing Bimekizumab and Adalimumab in people with Psoriatic Arthritis, run by UCB Biopharma SRL at 136 sites in 14 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a study to demonstrate the clinical efficacy, safety and tolerability of bimekizumab administered subcutaneously (sc) compared with placebo in the treatment of subjects with active Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Psoriatic Arthritis
What is being tested?
Bimekizumab and Adalimumab
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
852 participants
Where
136 sitesin 14 countries
Study dates
3 Apr 2019to 11 Jul 2022
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • An Institutional Review Board (IRB)/Independent Ethics Committee (IEC) approved written Informed Consent form is signed and dated by the subject
  • Subject is male or female at least 18 years of age
  • Female subject must be postmenopausal, permanently sterilized or willing to use a highly effective method of contraception
  • Documented diagnosis of adult-onset Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) meeting the Classification Criteria for Psoriatic Arthritis (CASPAR) for at least 6 months prior to Screening with active PsA and must have at Baseline tender joint count (TJC) >=3 out of 68 and swollen joint count (SJC) >=3 out of 66
  • Subject must be negative for rheumatoid factor and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (CCP) antibodies
  • Subject must have at least 1 active psoriatic lesion(s) and/or a documented history of psoriasis (PSO)
  • Subject must be a suitable candidate for treatment with adalimumab and has no contraindications to receive adalimumab as per the local label as assessed by the Investigator
  • Subjects currently taking NSAIDs, cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2) inhibitors, analgesics (including mild opioids), corticosteroids, methotrexate (MTX), leflunomide (LEF), sulfasalazine (SSZ), hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) AND/OR apremilast can be allowed if they fulfill specific requirements prior to study entry

Who cannot join

  • Female subjects who are breastfeeding, pregnant, or plan to become pregnant during the study
  • Subjects with current or prior exposure to any biologics for the treatment of Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) or Psoriasis (PSO)
  • Subject has an active infection or a history of recent serious infections
  • Subject has known tuberculosis (TB) infection, is at high risk of acquiring TB infection, or has current or history of nontuberculous mycobacterium (NTMB) infection
  • Subject has a diagnosis of inflammatory conditions other than PSO or PsA. Subjects with a diagnosis of Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, or other inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are allowed as long as they have no active symptomatic disease at Screening or Baseline
  • Subject had acute anterior uveitis within 6 weeks of Baseline
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Subject has any active malignancy or history of malignancy within 5 years prior to the Screening Visit EXCEPT treated and considered cured cutaneous squamous or basal cell carcinoma, or in situ cervical cancer
  • Subject has a form of PSO other than chronic plaque-type (eg, pustular, erythrodermic and guttate PSO, or drug-induced PSO)
  • Presence of active suicidal ideation, or moderately severe major depression or severe major depression
  • Subject has a history of chronic alcohol or drug abuse within 6 months prior to Screening

Trial locations and contacts

136 sites in 14 countries.

136 sites in 14 countries

United States25 sites
  • Pa0010 50029

    Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87102

  • Pa0010 50039

    Atlanta, Georgia, 30342

  • Pa0010 50002

    Austin, Texas, 78731

  • Pa0010 50050

    Beckley, West Virginia, 25801

  • Pa0010 50010

    Brooklyn, New York, 11201

  • Pa0010 50125

    Charlotte, North Carolina, 28210

  • Pa0010 50049

    Corpus Christi, Texas, 78404

  • Pa0010 50040

    Dayton, Ohio, 45417

  • Pa0010 50020

    Duncansville, Pennsylvania, 16635

  • Pa0010 50015

    Hagerstown, Maryland, 21742

  • Pa0010 50051

    Houston, Texas, 77034

  • Pa0010 50001

    Jackson, Tennessee, 38305

  • Pa0010 50008

    Johnston, Rhode Island, 02919

  • Pa0010 50028

    Lexington, Kentucky, 40504

  • Pa0010 50012

    Memphis, Tennessee, 38119

  • Pa0010 50036

    Mesquite, Texas, 75150

  • Pa0010 50007

    Orangeburg, South Carolina, 29118

  • Pa0010 50033

    Palm Harbor, Florida, 34684

  • Pa0010 50017

    Phoenix, Arizona, 85037

  • Pa0010 50035

    San Diego, California, 92025

  • Pa0010 50016

    St Louis, Missouri, 63141

  • Pa0010 50037

    Tampa, Florida, 33613

  • Pa0010 50004

    Tustin, California, 92780

  • Pa0010 50009

    Waco, Texas, 76710

  • Pa0010 50006

    Wyomissing, Pennsylvania, 19610

Other trials in United States

Poland19 sites
  • Pa0010 40093

    Bialystok

  • Pa0010 40119

    Bydgoszcz

  • Pa0010 40038

    Elblag

  • Pa0010 40088

    Elblag

  • Pa0010 40096

    Gdynia

  • Pa0010 40042

    Krakow

  • Pa0010 40092

    Krakow

  • Pa0010 40037

    Lublin

  • Pa0010 40091

    Nowa Sól

  • Pa0010 40044

    Poznan

  • Pa0010 40090

    Poznan

  • Pa0010 40118

    Torun

  • Pa0010 40041

    Warsaw

  • Pa0010 40094

    Warsaw

  • Pa0010 40097

    Warsaw

  • Pa0010 40098

    Warsaw

  • Pa0010 40039

    Wroclaw

  • Pa0010 40043

    Wroclaw

  • Pa0010 40095

    Wroclaw

Other trials in Poland

Russia17 sites
  • Pa0010 20002

    Moscow

  • Pa0010 20005

    Moscow

  • Pa0010 20010

    Moscow

  • Pa0010 20017

    Moscow

  • Pa0010 20013

    Petrozavodsk

  • Pa0010 20012

    Ryazan

  • Pa0010 20016

    Ryazan

  • Pa0010 20001

    Saint Petersburg

  • Pa0010 20003

    Saint Petersburg

  • Pa0010 20004

    Saint Petersburg

  • Pa0010 20009

    Saint Petersburg

  • Pa0010 20083

    Saint Petersburg

  • Pa0010 20007

    Saratov

  • Pa0010 20014

    Ulyanovsk

  • Pa0010 20006

    Vladimir

  • Pa0010 20008

    Yaroslavl

  • Pa0010 20015

    Yaroslavl

Other trials in Russia

Japan14 sites
  • Pa0010 20035

    Bunkyō City

  • Pa0010 20036

    Kawachi-Nagano-shi

  • Pa0010 20045

    Kita-ku

  • Pa0010 20049

    Kitakyushu

  • Pa0010 20044

    Minatoku

  • Pa0010 20033

    Nagoya

  • Pa0010 20041

    Osaka

  • Pa0010 20046

    Osaka

  • Pa0010 20048

    Saitama

  • Pa0010 20031

    Sapporo

  • Pa0010 20042

    Sasebo

  • Pa0010 20032

    Suita

  • Pa0010 20043

    tabashi City

  • Pa0010 20030

    Tokyo

Other trials in Japan

Germany12 sites
  • Pa0010 40074

    Bad Doberan

  • Pa0010 40025

    Berlin

  • Pa0010 40028

    Berlin

  • Pa0010 40076

    Cottbus

  • Pa0010 40023

    Erlangen

  • Pa0010 40117

    Frankfurt

  • Pa0010 40029

    Hamburg

  • Pa0010 40071

    Hamburg

  • Pa0010 40027

    Herne

  • Pa0010 40078

    Leipzig

  • Pa0010 40348

    Magdeburg

  • Pa0010 40026

    Ratingen

Other trials in Germany

Czechia11 sites
  • Pa0010 40061

    Brno

  • Pa0010 40065

    Brno

  • Pa0010 40062

    Ostrava

  • Pa0010 40009

    Pardubice

  • Pa0010 40013

    Prague

  • Pa0010 40014

    Prague

  • Pa0010 40015

    Prague

  • Pa0010 40063

    Prague

  • Pa0010 40066

    Prague

  • Pa0010 40010

    Uherské Hradiště

  • Pa0010 40012

    Zlín

Other trials in Czechia

Spain9 sites
  • Pa0010 40045

    A Coruña

  • Pa0010 40105

    Córdoba

  • Pa0010 40102

    Málaga

  • Pa0010 40101

    Sabadell

  • Pa0010 40104

    Santiago de Compostela

  • Pa0010 40049

    Seville

  • Pa0010 40103

    Seville

  • Pa0010 40106

    Seville

  • Pa0010 40099

    Vigo

Other trials in Spain

Hungary8 sites
  • Pa0010 40081

    Budapest

  • Pa0010 40083

    Budapest

  • Pa0010 40032

    Debrecen

  • Pa0010 40030

    Eger

  • Pa0010 40082

    Kistarcsa

  • Pa0010 40033

    Székesfehérvár

  • Pa0010 40079

    Szentes

  • Pa0010 40080

    Szombathely

Other trials in Hungary

Australia6 sites
  • Pa0010 30005

    Camberwell

  • Pa0010 30002

    Clayton

  • Pa0010 30008

    Hobart

  • Pa0010 30003

    Maroochydore

  • Pa0010 30007

    Victoria Park

  • Pa0010 30006

    Woodville

Other trials in Australia

Canada4 sites
  • Pa0010 50041

    Québec

  • Pa0010 50042

    Rimouski

  • Pa0010 50043

    Sidney

  • Pa0010 50044

    Trois-Rivières

Other trials in Canada

Italy4 sites
  • Pa0010 40084

    Catania

  • Pa0010 40087

    Milan

  • Pa0010 40085

    Pisa

  • Pa0010 40086

    Reggio Emilia

Other trials in Italy

Belgium3 sites
  • Pa0010 40003

    Genk

  • Pa0010 40002

    Leuven

  • Pa0010 40059

    Mons

Other trials in Belgium

France2 sites
  • Pa0010 40019

    Paris

  • Pa0010 40068

    Tours

Other trials in France

United Kingdom2 sites
  • Pa0010 40111

    Leeds

  • Pa0010 40107

    Wolverhampton

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Official title: A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Active Reference (Adalimumab) Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Bimekizumab in the Treatment of Subjects With Active Psoriatic Arthritis

This is a study to demonstrate the clinical efficacy, safety and tolerability of bimekizumab administered subcutaneously (sc) compared with placebo in the treatment of subjects with active Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA).

Being tested
Bimekizumab, Adalimumab, Placebo
Keywords
Psoriatic Arthritis, PsA, Bimekizumab
Medical subject headings
Arthritis, Psoriatic

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • BimekizumabDrug

    Also called BKZ, UCB4940

    Subjects will receive bimekizumab at pre-specified time-points.

  • AdalimumabDrug

    Also called HUMIRA®

    Adalimumab will be administered according to the labeling recommendations.

  • PlaceboOther

    Also called PBO

    Subjects will receive placebo at pre-specified time-points.

Study groups in NCT03895203
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Bimekzumab dosage regimenExperimentalSubjects randomized to this arm will receive assigned bimekizumab dosage regimen and placebo to maintain the blinding with adalimumab and placebo arms during the Treatment Period.
Receives: Drug: Bimekizumab; Other: Placebo
Adalimumab dosage regimenActive comparatorSubjects randomized to this arm will receive the assigned adalimumab dosage regimen during the Treatment Period.
Receives: Drug: Adalimumab
PlaceboPlacebo comparatorSubjects randomized to this arm will receive placebo during the Double-Blind Treatment Period and will be reallocated to receive bimekizumab dosage regimen during the Maintenance Period.
Receives: Drug: Bimekizumab; Other: Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 50 Response at Week 16

    ACR50 response rate: 50% or greater improvement of arthritis relative to Baseline. Those who met following 3 conditions for improvement from Baseline were classified as meeting ACR50 response criteria: greater than or equal (≥) 50% improvement in 68-tender joint count; ≥ 50% improvement in 66-swollen joint count; ≥ 50% improvement in at least 3 of 5 following parameters: Physician global assessment of disease activity (0-100 millimeter [mm] visual analog scale [VAS] [0 = no symptoms;100 = severe symptoms]), Patient global assessment of disease activity (100 mm VAS [0 = no limitation of normal activities; 100 = very poor]), Patient assessment of pain (100 mm VAS [0 = no pain; 100 = most severe pain]), Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) assessed degree of difficulty experienced in 8 domains of daily living activities (20 questions), total score (0-3) computed from item scores, lower scores indicated less disability and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP).

    Measured: Week 16

Secondary outcomes (19)
  1. Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 16 for Placebo and BKZ

    The HAQ-DI contains 20 items that measured the degree of difficulty experienced in the following 8 categories of the daily living activities: dressing and grooming (2 items), arising (2 items), eating (3 items), walking (2 items), hygiene (3 items), reach (2 items), grip (3 items), and common daily activities (3 items). Each question was scored 0-3 (0 = without any difficulty, 1 = with some difficulty, 2 = with much difficulty, and 3 = unable to do). The overall HAQ-DI total score was calculated by dividing the sum of the highest category scores (0 to 24) by the number of categories with at least 1 question answered. The HAQ-DI total score ranges from 0 (no difficulty) to 3 (maximum difficulty). A lower HAQ-DI score indicated an improvement in function. Change from baseline was computed as the value at Week 16 minus the baseline value. A negative value in change from baseline indicated an improvement.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 16

  2. Percentage of Participants With a Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) 90 Response at Week 4 in the Subgroup of Participants With Psoriasis (PSO) Involving at Least 3% Body Surface Area (BSA) at Baseline

    The PASI90 response assessments are based on at least 90% improvement in PASI score from Baseline. Body divided into 4 areas: head, arms, trunk to groin, and legs to top of buttocks. Assignment of an average score for redness, thickness, and scaling for each of the 4 body areas with a score of 0 (clear) to 4 (very marked). Determining the percentage of skin covered with PSO for each of the body areas and converting to a 0 to 6 scale. Final PASI = average redness, thickness, and scaliness of the psoriatic skin lesions, multiplied by the involved psoriasis area score of respective section, and weighted by the percentage of the person's affected skin for respective section. The minimum possible PASI score is 0 = no disease, the maximum score is 72 = maximal disease.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 4

  3. Percentage of Participants With a PASI90 Response at Week 16 in the Subgroup of Participants With PSO Involving at Least 3% BSA at Baseline

    The PASI90 response assessments are based on at least 90% improvement in PASI score from Baseline. Body divided into 4 areas: head, arms, trunk to groin, and legs to top of buttocks. Assignment of an average score for redness, thickness, and scaling for each of the 4 body areas with a score of 0 (clear) to 4 (very marked). Determining the percentage of skin covered with PSO for each of the body areas and converting to a 0 to 6 scale. Final PASI = average redness, thickness, and scaliness of the psoriatic skin lesions, multiplied by the involved psoriasis area score of respective section, and weighted by the percentage of the person's affected skin for respective section. The minimum possible PASI score is 0 = no disease, the maximum score is 72 = maximal disease.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 16

  4. Change From Baseline in the Short Form 36-item Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) at Week 16 for Placebo and BKZ

    SF-36 (version 2, standard recall):36-item generic health-related Quality of Life instrument that uses recall period of 4 weeks. Questionnaire has 36 questions composing scale that represent 8 domains:physical functioning; role physical; bodily pain;general health;vitality; social functioning;role emotional; and mental health. Scores for 8 domains were combined into two summary scores: physical component summary (PCS) score and mental component summary (MCS) score. Scores for 2 components summary (PCS and MCS) and 8 domains have been calculated and computed as raw/observed score to norm-based T-score metric(mean=50, standard deviation=10), raw score min=0(worst), max=100(best). Individual respondent's score falls outside T-score range of 45 to 55 was considered outside average range and when considering group-level data, score below 47 was considered indicative of impaired functioning within that health domain or dimension. Positive value in change from Baseline indicated improvement.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 16

  5. Percentage of Participants With a Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) at Week 16

    MDA is measure to indicate disease remission, and is based on composite score of 7 domains. Participant is considered having achieved MDA if participant fulfills at least 5 of following 7 criteria: Tender joint count (0-68 joints) less than or equal to (≤1); Swollen joint count (0-66 joints) ≤ 1; PASI ≤ 1 or BSA ≤ 3: In PASI, body divided into four parts, head and neck, upper limb, trunk and lower limbs. Each area assessed for erythema, induration and scaling, each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. Total score ranges from 0(no disease) to 72 (maximal disease)]; Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain ≤ 15 [using VAS on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 100 (severe pain)]; Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity ≤ 20 [using VAS on a scale of 0 (very well) to 100 (very poor)]; HAQ-DI score ≤ 0.5, HAQ-DI score ranges from 0 (no difficulty) to 3 (maximum difficulty); Leeds Enthesitis Index score ≤ 1 for participants with enthesitis at baseline.

    Measured: Week 16

  6. Change From Baseline in Van Der Heijde Modified Total Sharp Score (vdHmTSS) in Participants With Elevated Hs-CRP and/or at Least 1 Bone Erosion at Baseline at Week 16 for Placebo and BKZ

    The degree of joint damage was assessed using the vdHmTSS by quantifying the extent of bone erosions and joint space narrowing for 64 and 52 joints, respectively. The vdHmTSS ranges from 0 to 528, with higher scores representing greater damage. Descriptive statistics for ADA 40 mg reference arm was not calculated and reported since reference based imputation analysis method is used with Placebo as reference. As pre-specified in the SAP, this analysis was performed only for the participants randomized to Placebo and BKZ.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 16

  7. Percentage of Participants With an Enthesitis-free State in the Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI) at Week 16 in the Subgroup of Participants With Enthesitis at Baseline in the Pooled Population of PA0010 and PA0011

    Presence of enthesitis was assessed in the subgroup of participants with enthesitis by palpation on the lateral epicondyles of the humerus (elbows), medial femoral epicondyles (knees), and Achilles tendons (heels) bilaterally and scored as 0 (no tenderness) and 1 (tenderness) at Baseline. The LEI consists of 6 items, 3 for the right part and 3 for the left part of the body. LEI is derived as the sum of the enthesitis score over the 6 sites mentioned above. The total score ranges from 0 to 6, higher scores indicates greater degree of enthesitis. Descriptive/Inferential statistics for ADA 40 mg reference arm was not calculated and reported since pooled data with PA0011 study is used which did not have ADA 40 mg arm.

    Measured: Baseline of PA0010 for Participants of PA0010 and Baseline of PA0011 for Participants of PA0011, Week 16

  8. Percentage of Participants With a Dactylitis-free State Based on the Leeds Dactylitis Index (LDI) at Week 16 in the Subgroup of Participants With Dactylitis at Baseline in the Pooled Population of PA0010 and PA0011

    The LDI quantitatively measures dactylitis using the circumference of involved digits and control digits and tenderness of involved digits. Digits affected by dactylitis are defined as those with a 10% difference in the ratio of circumference of the affected digit to the contralateral digit. The control digit is either the contralateral digit (digit on opposite hand or foot). The ratio of circumference between an affected digit and the control digit is multiplied by the tenderness score for the affected digit. The results from each involved digit are summed to provide the final LDI score. A higher LDI indicates worse dactylitis. Tenderness score (0 = no tenderness, 1 = tender). Descriptive/Inferential statistics for ADA 40 mg reference arm was not calculated and reported since pooled data with PA0011 study was used which did not have ADA 40 mg arm.

    Measured: Baseline of PA0010 for Participants of PA0010 and Baseline of PA0011 for Participants of PA0011, Week 16

  9. Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 Response at Week 16

    The ACR20 response rate was based on a 20% or greater improvement of arthritis relative to Baseline. Participants who met the following 3 conditions for improvement from Baseline were classified as meeting the ACR20 response criteria: 1. ≥ 20% improvement in 68-tender joint count; 2. ≥ 20% improvement in 66-swollen joint count; and 3. ≥ 20% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: Physician global assessment of disease activity (100 mm VAS [0 = no symptoms; 100 = severe symptoms]), Patient global assessment of disease activity (100 mm VAS [0 = no limitation of normal activities; 100 = very poor]), Patient assessment of pain (100 mm VAS [0 = no pain; 100 = most severe pain]), HAQ-DI assessed degree of difficulty experienced in 8 domains of daily living activities (20 questions), its score (0-3) computed from item scores, lower scores indicated less disability, hsCRP.

    Measured: Week 16

  10. Change From Baseline in Van Der Heijde Modified Total Sharp Score (vdHmTSS) in the Overall Population at Week 16 for Placebo and BKZ

    The degree of joint damage was assessed using the vdHmTSS by quantifying the extent of bone erosions and joint space narrowing for 64 and 52 joints, respectively. The vdHmTSS ranges from 0 to 448, with higher scores representing greater damage. Descriptive statistics for ADA 40 mg reference arm was not calculated and reported since reference based imputation analysis method was used with Placebo as reference.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 16

  11. Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 70 Response at Week 16

    The ACR70 response rate was based on a 70% or greater improvement of arthritis relative to Baseline. Participants who met the following 3 conditions for improvement from Baseline were classified as meeting the ACR70 response criteria: 1. ≥ 70% improvement in 68-tender joint count; 2. ≥ 70% improvement in 66-swollen joint count; and 3. ≥ 70% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: Physician global assessment of disease activity (100 mm VAS [0 = no symptoms;100 = severe symptoms]), Patient global assessment of disease activity (100 mm VAS [0 = no limitation of normal activities;100 = very poor]), Patient assessment of pain (100 mm VAS [0 = no pain; 100 = most severe pain]), HAQ-DI assessed degree of difficulty experienced in 8 domains of daily living activities (20 questions), its score (0-3) computed from item scores, lower scores indicated less disability, hsCRP.

    Measured: Week 16

  12. Percentage of Participants With Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) Response Defined as Score of 0 (Clear) or 1 (Almost Clear) AND at Least a 2-grade Reduction From Baseline at Week 4 in the Subset of Participants With Psoriatic Skin Lesions at Baseline

    IGA measured the overall severity of PSO using the following 5-point scale and score was rated as 0 = clear (No signs of PSO; post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation may be present), 1 = almost clear (No thickening; normal to pink coloration; no to minimal focal scaling), 2 = mild (Just detectable to mild thickening; pink to light red coloration; predominately fine scaling), 3 = moderate (Clearly distinguishable to moderate thickening; dull to bright red, moderate scaling), and 4 = severe (Severe thickening with hard edges; bright to deep dark red coloration; severe/coarse scaling covering almost all or all lesions). The IGA response is defined as score of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear) with at least a 2-category improvement relative to Baseline.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 4

  13. Percentage of Participants With an IGA Response Defined as Score of 0 (Clear) or 1 (Almost Clear) AND at Least a 2-grade Reduction From Baseline at Week 16 in the Subset of Participants With Psoriatic Skin Lesions at Baseline

    IGA measured the overall severity of PSO using the following 5-point scale and score was rated as 0 = clear (No signs of PSO; post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation may be present), 1 = almost clear (No thickening; normal to pink coloration; no to minimal focal scaling), 2 = mild (Just detectable to mild thickening; pink to light red coloration; predominately fine scaling), 3 = moderate (Clearly distinguishable to moderate thickening; dull to bright red, moderate scaling), and 4 = severe (Severe thickening with hard edges; bright to deep dark red coloration; severe/coarse scaling covering almost all or all lesions). The IGA response is defined as score of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear) with at least a 2-category improvement relative to Baseline.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 16

  14. Change From Baseline in the Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain (PtAAP) at Week 16

    The PtAAP VAS is part of the American College of Rheumatology core set of measures in arthritis. Participants assessed their arthritis pain using a VAS ranging from 0 (no pain) to 100 (most severe pain). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 16

  15. Percentage of Participants With an Enthesitis-free State Based on the Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) Index at Week 16 in the Subgroup of Participants With Enthesitis at Baseline

    Presence of enthesitis was assessed in the subgroup of participants with enthesitis at Baseline. The SPARCC index measures the severity of enthesitis through the assessment of 16 sites, 8 for the right part and 8 for the left part of the body: the greater trochanter (right/left), quadriceps tendon insertion into the patella (right/left), patellar ligament insertion into the patella and tibial tuberosity (right/left), achilles tendon insertion (right/left), plantar fascia insertion (right/left), medial and lateral epicondyles (right/left), and the supraspinatus insertion (right/left). Tenderness on examination is recorded as either present (1) or absent (0) for each of the 16 sites, for an average range of 0 (no enthesitis) to 16 (severe enthesitis).

    Measured: Baseline, Week 16

  16. Change From Baseline in Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease-12 (PsAID-12) Total Score at Week 16

    The PsAID-12 is a patient-reported outcome measure for assessing the impact of Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) in 12 physical and psychological domains, including pain, fatigue, skin problems, work and/or leisure activities, functional capacity, discomfort, sleep disturbance, coping, anxiety/fear/uncertainty, embarrassment and/or shame, social participation, and depression. Each domain is assessed with a single question using a 0 to 10 numerical rating scale. Each domain score was multiplied by a weighting factor and the results were then summed to provide the total score. The total score ranged from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating a worse status. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 16

  17. Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During the Study

    An Adverse Event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation participants administered a pharmaceutical product, which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE could therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product, whether or not related to the medicinal (investigational) product. TEAEs were defined as any AEs with an onset date on or after the date of first IMP administration and within 140 days after the final dose of IMP.

    Measured: From Baseline until Safety Follow-Up (up to Week 72)

  18. Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the Study

    A SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: Results in death, is life-threatening, requires in patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; is a congenital anomaly or birth defect; is an infection that requires treatment parenteral antibiotics, other important medical events which based on medical or scientific judgement may jeopardize the patients, or may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent any of the above. TEAEs were defined as any AEs with an onset date on or after the date of first IMP administration and within 140 days after the final dose of IMP.

    Measured: From Baseline until Safety Follow-Up (up to Week 72)

  19. Percentage of Participants With TEAEs Leading to Withdrawal From IMP During the Study

    An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation participants administered a pharmaceutical product, which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE could therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product, whether or not related to the medicinal (investigational) product. TEAEs were defined as any AEs with an onset date on or after the date of first IMP administration and within 140 days after the final dose of IMP.

    Measured: From Baseline until Safety Follow-Up (up to Week 72)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted29 Mar 2019
  2. Study start3 Apr 2019
  3. Primary completion17 Aug 2021
  4. Study completion11 Jul 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
852 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03895203
Sponsor's protocol ID
PA0010
Other IDs
2017-002322-20, 2017
Acronym
BE OPTIMAL
Status last verified
Aug 2026
First submitted
27 Mar 2019
Last updated
28 Sep 2026
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Data from this trial may be requested by qualified researchers six months after product approval in the US and/or Europe, or global development is discontinued, and 18 months after trial completion. Investigators may request access to anonymized individual patient-level data and redacted trial documents which may include: analysis-ready datasets, study protocol, annotated case report form, statistical analysis plan, dataset specifications, and clinical study report. Prior to use of the data, proposals need to be approved by an independent review panel at www.Vivli.org and a signed data sharing agreement will need to be executed. All documents are available in English only, for a pre-specified time, typically 12 months, on a password protected portal. This plan may change if the risk of re-identifying trial participants is determined to be too high after the trial is completed; in this case and to protect participants, individual patient-level data would not be made available.

Publications

  • Ritchlin CT, Coates LC, McInnes IB, Mease PJ, Merola JF, Tanaka Y, Asahina A, Gossec L, Gottlieb AB, Warren RB, Ink B, Bajracharya R, Shende V, Coarse J, Landewe RB. Bimekizumab treatment in biologic DMARD-naive patients with active psoriatic arthritis: 52-week efficacy and safety results from the phase III, randomised, placebo-controlled, active reference BE OPTIMAL study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2023 Nov;82(11):1404-1414. doi: 10.1136/ard-2023-224431. Epub 2023 Sep 11.

    PubMed 37696588
  • Mease PJ, Warren RB, Nash P, Grouin JM, Lyris N, Willems D, Taieb V, Eells J, McInnes IB. Comparative Effectiveness of Bimekizumab and Secukinumab in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis at 52 Weeks Using a Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison. Rheumatol Ther. 2024 Jun;11(3):817-828. doi: 10.1007/s40744-024-00652-7. Epub 2024 Mar 6.

    PubMed 38446397
  • Kristensen LE, Tillett W, Nash P, Coates LC, Mease PJ, Ogdie A, Gisondi P, Ink B, Prickett AR, Bajracharya R, Taieb V, Lyris N, Lambert J, Walsh JA. Association of achieving clinical disease control criteria and patient-reported outcomes in bimekizumab-treated patients with active psoriatic arthritis: results from two phase III studies. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2024 Nov 11;16:1759720X241288071. doi: 10.1177/1759720X241288071. eCollection 2024.

    PubMed 39534481
  • Mease PJ, Merola JF, Tanaka Y, Gossec L, McInnes IB, Ritchlin CT, Landewe RBM, Asahina A, Ink B, Heinrichs A, Bajracharya R, Shende V, Coarse J, Coates LC. Summary of Research: Safety and Efficacy of Bimekizumab in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis: 2-Year Results from Two Phase 3 Studies. Rheumatol Ther. 2025 Aug;12(4):609-612. doi: 10.1007/s40744-025-00764-8. Epub 2025 May 10.

    PubMed 40347389
  • Thaci D, Asahina A, Boehncke WH, Gottlieb AB, Lebwohl M, Warren RB, Edens H, Ink B, Bajracharya R, Coarse J, Merola JF. Bimekizumab Efficacy and Safety in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis with Substantial Skin and Nail Psoriasis to 1 Year. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2026 Feb;16(2):953-976. doi: 10.1007/s13555-025-01599-5. Epub 2025 Dec 12.

    PubMed 41381988
  • Gossec L, Coates LC, Landewe RBM, Mease PJ, Merola JF, Ritchlin CT, Tanaka Y, Asahina A, Proft F, Goldammer N, Manente M, Ink B, Bajracharya R, Coarse J, McInnes IB. Bimekizumab safety and efficacy in patients with psoriatic arthritis: 3-year results from two phase 3 studies. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2026 May 5;65(5):keag118. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keag118.

    PubMed 41838419
  • Gossec L, Tillett W, Coates LC, Mease PJ, de Wit M, Gladman DD, Orbai AM, Proft F, Ink B, Bajracharya R, Lambert J, Healy P, Husni ME. Control of Inflammation and Sustained Improvements in Patient-Reported Outcomes in Patients With Psoriatic Arthritis: Bimekizumab Two-Year Results From Two Phase 3 Studies. ACR Open Rheumatol. 2026 May;8(5):e90053. doi: 10.1002/acr2.90053.

    PubMed 42152504
  • Nikiphorou E, Tillett W, Deodhar A, Dubreuil M, Gossec L, Hwang M, Lubrano E, Machado PM, Rudwaleit M, de Wit M, Kavanagh S, de la Loge C, Ink B, Lambert J, Morup M, Boonen A, Walsh J. Effect of Bimekizumab Treatment on Health Status, Work Productivity, and Productivity Costs Through 3 Years in Axial Spondyloarthritis and Psoriatic Arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2026 Aug 1:jrheum.2026-0104. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.2026-0104. Online ahead of print.

    PubMed 42386286
  • Deodhar A, Gottlieb AB, Merola JF, Soriano ER, Coates LC, Ink B, Bajracharya R, Healy P, Mease PJ. Bimekizumab efficacy across GRAPPA domains to 3 years in patients with psoriatic arthritis: a post hoc analysis of two phase 3 studies. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2026 Oct 10:keag557. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keag557. Online ahead of print.

    PubMed 42860055
  • Mease PJ, Merola JF, Magrey M, Nash P, Poddubnyy D, Lebwohl M, Bajracharya R, Ink B, Marten A, Manente M, Peterson L, White K, Gensler LS. Bimekizumab longer-term safety profile in adult patients with axial spondyloarthritis or psoriatic arthritis: an updated analysis of six phase IIb/III clinical studies. RMD Open. 2026 Mar 10;12(1):e006174. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2025-006174.

    PubMed 41807031
  • Mease PJ, Gensler LS, Orbai AM, Warren RB, Bajracharya R, Ink B, Marten A, Massow U, Shende V, Manente M, Peterson L, White K, Landewe R, Poddubnyy D. Long-term safety of bimekizumab in adult patients with axial spondyloarthritis or psoriatic arthritis: pooled results from integrated phase IIb/III clinical studies. RMD Open. 2025 Apr 6;11(2):e005026. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2024-005026.

    PubMed 40194794
  • Gladman DD, Mease PJ, Gossec L, Husni ME, Gottlieb AB, Ink B, Bajracharya R, Coarse J, Lyris N, Lambert J, Tillett W. Effect of Bimekizumab on Patient-Reported Outcomes and Work Productivity in Patients With Psoriatic Arthritis: 1-Year Results From 2 Phase III Studies. J Rheumatol. 2025 May 1;52(5):466-478. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.2024-0923.

    PubMed 39892885
  • Husni ME, Mease PJ, Merola JF, Tillett W, Goldammer N, Ink B, Coarse J, Lambert J, Taieb V, Gladman DD. Bimekizumab provided rapid improvements in patient-reported symptoms and health-related quality of life in patients with active psoriatic arthritis: pooled 16-week results from two phase 3 studies. RMD Open. 2024 Sep 23;10(3):e004464. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2024-004464.

    PubMed 39313302
  • Mease PJ, Merola JF, Tanaka Y, Gossec L, McInnes IB, Ritchlin CT, Landewe RBM, Asahina A, Ink B, Heinrichs A, Bajracharya R, Shende V, Coarse J, Coates LC. Safety and Efficacy of Bimekizumab in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis: 2-Year Results from Two Phase 3 Studies. Rheumatol Ther. 2024 Oct;11(5):1363-1382. doi: 10.1007/s40744-024-00708-8. Epub 2024 Aug 31.

    PubMed 39215949
  • Mease PJ, Warren RB, Nash P, Grouin JM, Lyris N, Willems D, Taieb V, Eells J, McInnes IB. Comparative Effectiveness of Bimekizumab and Risankizumab in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis at 52 Weeks Assessed Using a Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison. Rheumatol Ther. 2024 Oct;11(5):1403-1412. doi: 10.1007/s40744-024-00706-w. Epub 2024 Aug 9.

    PubMed 39120849

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Bimekizumab and Adalimumab in people with Psoriatic Arthritis, run by UCB Biopharma SRL at 136 sites in 14 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 136 sites in United States, Poland, Russia, Japan, Germany and 9 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 23 Oct 2024). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 50 Response at Week 16 (time frame: Week 16). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03895203, which also lists 20 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Sep 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in