Psoriatic ArthritisPhase 3BE OPTIMALNCT03895203
A Study to Test the Efficacy and Safety of Bimekizumab in the Treatment of Subjects With Active Psoriatic Arthritis
A Phase 3 study testing Bimekizumab and Adalimumab in people with Psoriatic Arthritis, run by UCB Biopharma SRL at 136 sites in 14 countries.
Trial summary
This is a study to demonstrate the clinical efficacy, safety and tolerability of bimekizumab administered subcutaneously (sc) compared with placebo in the treatment of subjects with active Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Psoriatic Arthritis
- What is being tested?
- Bimekizumab and Adalimumab
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 852 participants
- Where
- 136 sitesin 14 countries
- Study dates
- 3 Apr 2019to 11 Jul 2022
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- An Institutional Review Board (IRB)/Independent Ethics Committee (IEC) approved written Informed Consent form is signed and dated by the subject
- Subject is male or female at least 18 years of age
- Female subject must be postmenopausal, permanently sterilized or willing to use a highly effective method of contraception
- Documented diagnosis of adult-onset Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) meeting the Classification Criteria for Psoriatic Arthritis (CASPAR) for at least 6 months prior to Screening with active PsA and must have at Baseline tender joint count (TJC) >=3 out of 68 and swollen joint count (SJC) >=3 out of 66
- Subject must be negative for rheumatoid factor and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (CCP) antibodies
- Subject must have at least 1 active psoriatic lesion(s) and/or a documented history of psoriasis (PSO)
- Subject must be a suitable candidate for treatment with adalimumab and has no contraindications to receive adalimumab as per the local label as assessed by the Investigator
- Subjects currently taking NSAIDs, cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2) inhibitors, analgesics (including mild opioids), corticosteroids, methotrexate (MTX), leflunomide (LEF), sulfasalazine (SSZ), hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) AND/OR apremilast can be allowed if they fulfill specific requirements prior to study entry
Who cannot join
- Female subjects who are breastfeeding, pregnant, or plan to become pregnant during the study
- Subjects with current or prior exposure to any biologics for the treatment of Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) or Psoriasis (PSO)
- Subject has an active infection or a history of recent serious infections
- Subject has known tuberculosis (TB) infection, is at high risk of acquiring TB infection, or has current or history of nontuberculous mycobacterium (NTMB) infection
- Subject has a diagnosis of inflammatory conditions other than PSO or PsA. Subjects with a diagnosis of Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, or other inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are allowed as long as they have no active symptomatic disease at Screening or Baseline
- Subject had acute anterior uveitis within 6 weeks of Baseline
Show all 10Show fewer
- Subject has any active malignancy or history of malignancy within 5 years prior to the Screening Visit EXCEPT treated and considered cured cutaneous squamous or basal cell carcinoma, or in situ cervical cancer
- Subject has a form of PSO other than chronic plaque-type (eg, pustular, erythrodermic and guttate PSO, or drug-induced PSO)
- Presence of active suicidal ideation, or moderately severe major depression or severe major depression
- Subject has a history of chronic alcohol or drug abuse within 6 months prior to Screening
Trial locations and contacts
136 sites in 14 countries.
136 sites in 14 countries
United States25 sites
Pa0010 50029
Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87102
Pa0010 50039
Atlanta, Georgia, 30342
Pa0010 50002
Austin, Texas, 78731
Pa0010 50050
Beckley, West Virginia, 25801
Pa0010 50010
Brooklyn, New York, 11201
Pa0010 50125
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28210
Pa0010 50049
Corpus Christi, Texas, 78404
Pa0010 50040
Dayton, Ohio, 45417
Pa0010 50020
Duncansville, Pennsylvania, 16635
Pa0010 50015
Hagerstown, Maryland, 21742
Pa0010 50051
Houston, Texas, 77034
Pa0010 50001
Jackson, Tennessee, 38305
Pa0010 50008
Johnston, Rhode Island, 02919
Pa0010 50028
Lexington, Kentucky, 40504
Pa0010 50012
Memphis, Tennessee, 38119
Pa0010 50036
Mesquite, Texas, 75150
Pa0010 50007
Orangeburg, South Carolina, 29118
Pa0010 50033
Palm Harbor, Florida, 34684
Pa0010 50017
Phoenix, Arizona, 85037
Pa0010 50035
San Diego, California, 92025
Pa0010 50016
St Louis, Missouri, 63141
Pa0010 50037
Tampa, Florida, 33613
Pa0010 50004
Tustin, California, 92780
Pa0010 50009
Waco, Texas, 76710
Pa0010 50006
Wyomissing, Pennsylvania, 19610
Poland19 sites
Pa0010 40093
Bialystok
Pa0010 40119
Bydgoszcz
Pa0010 40038
Elblag
Pa0010 40088
Elblag
Pa0010 40096
Gdynia
Pa0010 40042
Krakow
Pa0010 40092
Krakow
Pa0010 40037
Lublin
Pa0010 40091
Nowa Sól
Pa0010 40044
Poznan
Pa0010 40090
Poznan
Pa0010 40118
Torun
Pa0010 40041
Warsaw
Pa0010 40094
Warsaw
Pa0010 40097
Warsaw
Pa0010 40098
Warsaw
Pa0010 40039
Wroclaw
Pa0010 40043
Wroclaw
Pa0010 40095
Wroclaw
Russia17 sites
Pa0010 20002
Moscow
Pa0010 20005
Moscow
Pa0010 20010
Moscow
Pa0010 20017
Moscow
Pa0010 20013
Petrozavodsk
Pa0010 20012
Ryazan
Pa0010 20016
Ryazan
Pa0010 20001
Saint Petersburg
Pa0010 20003
Saint Petersburg
Pa0010 20004
Saint Petersburg
Pa0010 20009
Saint Petersburg
Pa0010 20083
Saint Petersburg
Pa0010 20007
Saratov
Pa0010 20014
Ulyanovsk
Pa0010 20006
Vladimir
Pa0010 20008
Yaroslavl
Pa0010 20015
Yaroslavl
Japan14 sites
Pa0010 20035
Bunkyō City
Pa0010 20036
Kawachi-Nagano-shi
Pa0010 20045
Kita-ku
Pa0010 20049
Kitakyushu
Pa0010 20044
Minatoku
Pa0010 20033
Nagoya
Pa0010 20041
Osaka
Pa0010 20046
Osaka
Pa0010 20048
Saitama
Pa0010 20031
Sapporo
Pa0010 20042
Sasebo
Pa0010 20032
Suita
Pa0010 20043
tabashi City
Pa0010 20030
Tokyo
Germany12 sites
Pa0010 40074
Bad Doberan
Pa0010 40025
Berlin
Pa0010 40028
Berlin
Pa0010 40076
Cottbus
Pa0010 40023
Erlangen
Pa0010 40117
Frankfurt
Pa0010 40029
Hamburg
Pa0010 40071
Hamburg
Pa0010 40027
Herne
Pa0010 40078
Leipzig
Pa0010 40348
Magdeburg
Pa0010 40026
Ratingen
Czechia11 sites
Pa0010 40061
Brno
Pa0010 40065
Brno
Pa0010 40062
Ostrava
Pa0010 40009
Pardubice
Pa0010 40013
Prague
Pa0010 40014
Prague
Pa0010 40015
Prague
Pa0010 40063
Prague
Pa0010 40066
Prague
Pa0010 40010
Uherské Hradiště
Pa0010 40012
Zlín
Spain9 sites
Pa0010 40045
A Coruña
Pa0010 40105
Córdoba
Pa0010 40102
Málaga
Pa0010 40101
Sabadell
Pa0010 40104
Santiago de Compostela
Pa0010 40049
Seville
Pa0010 40103
Seville
Pa0010 40106
Seville
Pa0010 40099
Vigo
Hungary8 sites
Pa0010 40081
Budapest
Pa0010 40083
Budapest
Pa0010 40032
Debrecen
Pa0010 40030
Eger
Pa0010 40082
Kistarcsa
Pa0010 40033
Székesfehérvár
Pa0010 40079
Szentes
Pa0010 40080
Szombathely
Australia6 sites
Pa0010 30005
Camberwell
Pa0010 30002
Clayton
Pa0010 30008
Hobart
Pa0010 30003
Maroochydore
Pa0010 30007
Victoria Park
Pa0010 30006
Woodville
Canada4 sites
Pa0010 50041
Québec
Pa0010 50042
Rimouski
Pa0010 50043
Sidney
Pa0010 50044
Trois-Rivières
Italy4 sites
Pa0010 40084
Catania
Pa0010 40087
Milan
Pa0010 40085
Pisa
Pa0010 40086
Reggio Emilia
About this study
Official title: A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Active Reference (Adalimumab) Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Bimekizumab in the Treatment of Subjects With Active Psoriatic Arthritis
This is a study to demonstrate the clinical efficacy, safety and tolerability of bimekizumab administered subcutaneously (sc) compared with placebo in the treatment of subjects with active Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA).
- Conditions
- Psoriatic Arthritis
- Being tested
- Bimekizumab, Adalimumab, Placebo
- Keywords
- Psoriatic Arthritis, PsA, Bimekizumab
- Medical subject headings
- Arthritis, Psoriatic
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
BimekizumabDrug
Also called BKZ, UCB4940
Subjects will receive bimekizumab at pre-specified time-points.
AdalimumabDrug
Also called HUMIRA®
Adalimumab will be administered according to the labeling recommendations.
PlaceboOther
Also called PBO
Subjects will receive placebo at pre-specified time-points.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Bimekzumab dosage regimen | Experimental | Subjects randomized to this arm will receive assigned bimekizumab dosage regimen and placebo to maintain the blinding with adalimumab and placebo arms during the Treatment Period. Receives: Drug: Bimekizumab; Other: Placebo |
| Adalimumab dosage regimen | Active comparator | Subjects randomized to this arm will receive the assigned adalimumab dosage regimen during the Treatment Period. Receives: Drug: Adalimumab |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Subjects randomized to this arm will receive placebo during the Double-Blind Treatment Period and will be reallocated to receive bimekizumab dosage regimen during the Maintenance Period. Receives: Drug: Bimekizumab; Other: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 50 Response at Week 16
ACR50 response rate: 50% or greater improvement of arthritis relative to Baseline. Those who met following 3 conditions for improvement from Baseline were classified as meeting ACR50 response criteria: greater than or equal (≥) 50% improvement in 68-tender joint count; ≥ 50% improvement in 66-swollen joint count; ≥ 50% improvement in at least 3 of 5 following parameters: Physician global assessment of disease activity (0-100 millimeter [mm] visual analog scale [VAS] [0 = no symptoms;100 = severe symptoms]), Patient global assessment of disease activity (100 mm VAS [0 = no limitation of normal activities; 100 = very poor]), Patient assessment of pain (100 mm VAS [0 = no pain; 100 = most severe pain]), Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) assessed degree of difficulty experienced in 8 domains of daily living activities (20 questions), total score (0-3) computed from item scores, lower scores indicated less disability and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP).
Measured: Week 16
Secondary outcomes (19)
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 16 for Placebo and BKZ
The HAQ-DI contains 20 items that measured the degree of difficulty experienced in the following 8 categories of the daily living activities: dressing and grooming (2 items), arising (2 items), eating (3 items), walking (2 items), hygiene (3 items), reach (2 items), grip (3 items), and common daily activities (3 items). Each question was scored 0-3 (0 = without any difficulty, 1 = with some difficulty, 2 = with much difficulty, and 3 = unable to do). The overall HAQ-DI total score was calculated by dividing the sum of the highest category scores (0 to 24) by the number of categories with at least 1 question answered. The HAQ-DI total score ranges from 0 (no difficulty) to 3 (maximum difficulty). A lower HAQ-DI score indicated an improvement in function. Change from baseline was computed as the value at Week 16 minus the baseline value. A negative value in change from baseline indicated an improvement.
Measured: Baseline, Week 16
Percentage of Participants With a Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) 90 Response at Week 4 in the Subgroup of Participants With Psoriasis (PSO) Involving at Least 3% Body Surface Area (BSA) at Baseline
The PASI90 response assessments are based on at least 90% improvement in PASI score from Baseline. Body divided into 4 areas: head, arms, trunk to groin, and legs to top of buttocks. Assignment of an average score for redness, thickness, and scaling for each of the 4 body areas with a score of 0 (clear) to 4 (very marked). Determining the percentage of skin covered with PSO for each of the body areas and converting to a 0 to 6 scale. Final PASI = average redness, thickness, and scaliness of the psoriatic skin lesions, multiplied by the involved psoriasis area score of respective section, and weighted by the percentage of the person's affected skin for respective section. The minimum possible PASI score is 0 = no disease, the maximum score is 72 = maximal disease.
Measured: Baseline, Week 4
Percentage of Participants With a PASI90 Response at Week 16 in the Subgroup of Participants With PSO Involving at Least 3% BSA at Baseline
The PASI90 response assessments are based on at least 90% improvement in PASI score from Baseline. Body divided into 4 areas: head, arms, trunk to groin, and legs to top of buttocks. Assignment of an average score for redness, thickness, and scaling for each of the 4 body areas with a score of 0 (clear) to 4 (very marked). Determining the percentage of skin covered with PSO for each of the body areas and converting to a 0 to 6 scale. Final PASI = average redness, thickness, and scaliness of the psoriatic skin lesions, multiplied by the involved psoriasis area score of respective section, and weighted by the percentage of the person's affected skin for respective section. The minimum possible PASI score is 0 = no disease, the maximum score is 72 = maximal disease.
Measured: Baseline, Week 16
Change From Baseline in the Short Form 36-item Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) at Week 16 for Placebo and BKZ
SF-36 (version 2, standard recall):36-item generic health-related Quality of Life instrument that uses recall period of 4 weeks. Questionnaire has 36 questions composing scale that represent 8 domains:physical functioning; role physical; bodily pain;general health;vitality; social functioning;role emotional; and mental health. Scores for 8 domains were combined into two summary scores: physical component summary (PCS) score and mental component summary (MCS) score. Scores for 2 components summary (PCS and MCS) and 8 domains have been calculated and computed as raw/observed score to norm-based T-score metric(mean=50, standard deviation=10), raw score min=0(worst), max=100(best). Individual respondent's score falls outside T-score range of 45 to 55 was considered outside average range and when considering group-level data, score below 47 was considered indicative of impaired functioning within that health domain or dimension. Positive value in change from Baseline indicated improvement.
Measured: Baseline, Week 16
Percentage of Participants With a Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) at Week 16
MDA is measure to indicate disease remission, and is based on composite score of 7 domains. Participant is considered having achieved MDA if participant fulfills at least 5 of following 7 criteria: Tender joint count (0-68 joints) less than or equal to (≤1); Swollen joint count (0-66 joints) ≤ 1; PASI ≤ 1 or BSA ≤ 3: In PASI, body divided into four parts, head and neck, upper limb, trunk and lower limbs. Each area assessed for erythema, induration and scaling, each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. Total score ranges from 0(no disease) to 72 (maximal disease)]; Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain ≤ 15 [using VAS on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 100 (severe pain)]; Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity ≤ 20 [using VAS on a scale of 0 (very well) to 100 (very poor)]; HAQ-DI score ≤ 0.5, HAQ-DI score ranges from 0 (no difficulty) to 3 (maximum difficulty); Leeds Enthesitis Index score ≤ 1 for participants with enthesitis at baseline.
Measured: Week 16
Change From Baseline in Van Der Heijde Modified Total Sharp Score (vdHmTSS) in Participants With Elevated Hs-CRP and/or at Least 1 Bone Erosion at Baseline at Week 16 for Placebo and BKZ
The degree of joint damage was assessed using the vdHmTSS by quantifying the extent of bone erosions and joint space narrowing for 64 and 52 joints, respectively. The vdHmTSS ranges from 0 to 528, with higher scores representing greater damage. Descriptive statistics for ADA 40 mg reference arm was not calculated and reported since reference based imputation analysis method is used with Placebo as reference. As pre-specified in the SAP, this analysis was performed only for the participants randomized to Placebo and BKZ.
Measured: Baseline, Week 16
Percentage of Participants With an Enthesitis-free State in the Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI) at Week 16 in the Subgroup of Participants With Enthesitis at Baseline in the Pooled Population of PA0010 and PA0011
Presence of enthesitis was assessed in the subgroup of participants with enthesitis by palpation on the lateral epicondyles of the humerus (elbows), medial femoral epicondyles (knees), and Achilles tendons (heels) bilaterally and scored as 0 (no tenderness) and 1 (tenderness) at Baseline. The LEI consists of 6 items, 3 for the right part and 3 for the left part of the body. LEI is derived as the sum of the enthesitis score over the 6 sites mentioned above. The total score ranges from 0 to 6, higher scores indicates greater degree of enthesitis. Descriptive/Inferential statistics for ADA 40 mg reference arm was not calculated and reported since pooled data with PA0011 study is used which did not have ADA 40 mg arm.
Measured: Baseline of PA0010 for Participants of PA0010 and Baseline of PA0011 for Participants of PA0011, Week 16
Percentage of Participants With a Dactylitis-free State Based on the Leeds Dactylitis Index (LDI) at Week 16 in the Subgroup of Participants With Dactylitis at Baseline in the Pooled Population of PA0010 and PA0011
The LDI quantitatively measures dactylitis using the circumference of involved digits and control digits and tenderness of involved digits. Digits affected by dactylitis are defined as those with a 10% difference in the ratio of circumference of the affected digit to the contralateral digit. The control digit is either the contralateral digit (digit on opposite hand or foot). The ratio of circumference between an affected digit and the control digit is multiplied by the tenderness score for the affected digit. The results from each involved digit are summed to provide the final LDI score. A higher LDI indicates worse dactylitis. Tenderness score (0 = no tenderness, 1 = tender). Descriptive/Inferential statistics for ADA 40 mg reference arm was not calculated and reported since pooled data with PA0011 study was used which did not have ADA 40 mg arm.
Measured: Baseline of PA0010 for Participants of PA0010 and Baseline of PA0011 for Participants of PA0011, Week 16
Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 Response at Week 16
The ACR20 response rate was based on a 20% or greater improvement of arthritis relative to Baseline. Participants who met the following 3 conditions for improvement from Baseline were classified as meeting the ACR20 response criteria: 1. ≥ 20% improvement in 68-tender joint count; 2. ≥ 20% improvement in 66-swollen joint count; and 3. ≥ 20% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: Physician global assessment of disease activity (100 mm VAS [0 = no symptoms; 100 = severe symptoms]), Patient global assessment of disease activity (100 mm VAS [0 = no limitation of normal activities; 100 = very poor]), Patient assessment of pain (100 mm VAS [0 = no pain; 100 = most severe pain]), HAQ-DI assessed degree of difficulty experienced in 8 domains of daily living activities (20 questions), its score (0-3) computed from item scores, lower scores indicated less disability, hsCRP.
Measured: Week 16
Change From Baseline in Van Der Heijde Modified Total Sharp Score (vdHmTSS) in the Overall Population at Week 16 for Placebo and BKZ
The degree of joint damage was assessed using the vdHmTSS by quantifying the extent of bone erosions and joint space narrowing for 64 and 52 joints, respectively. The vdHmTSS ranges from 0 to 448, with higher scores representing greater damage. Descriptive statistics for ADA 40 mg reference arm was not calculated and reported since reference based imputation analysis method was used with Placebo as reference.
Measured: Baseline, Week 16
Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 70 Response at Week 16
The ACR70 response rate was based on a 70% or greater improvement of arthritis relative to Baseline. Participants who met the following 3 conditions for improvement from Baseline were classified as meeting the ACR70 response criteria: 1. ≥ 70% improvement in 68-tender joint count; 2. ≥ 70% improvement in 66-swollen joint count; and 3. ≥ 70% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: Physician global assessment of disease activity (100 mm VAS [0 = no symptoms;100 = severe symptoms]), Patient global assessment of disease activity (100 mm VAS [0 = no limitation of normal activities;100 = very poor]), Patient assessment of pain (100 mm VAS [0 = no pain; 100 = most severe pain]), HAQ-DI assessed degree of difficulty experienced in 8 domains of daily living activities (20 questions), its score (0-3) computed from item scores, lower scores indicated less disability, hsCRP.
Measured: Week 16
Percentage of Participants With Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) Response Defined as Score of 0 (Clear) or 1 (Almost Clear) AND at Least a 2-grade Reduction From Baseline at Week 4 in the Subset of Participants With Psoriatic Skin Lesions at Baseline
IGA measured the overall severity of PSO using the following 5-point scale and score was rated as 0 = clear (No signs of PSO; post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation may be present), 1 = almost clear (No thickening; normal to pink coloration; no to minimal focal scaling), 2 = mild (Just detectable to mild thickening; pink to light red coloration; predominately fine scaling), 3 = moderate (Clearly distinguishable to moderate thickening; dull to bright red, moderate scaling), and 4 = severe (Severe thickening with hard edges; bright to deep dark red coloration; severe/coarse scaling covering almost all or all lesions). The IGA response is defined as score of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear) with at least a 2-category improvement relative to Baseline.
Measured: Baseline, Week 4
Percentage of Participants With an IGA Response Defined as Score of 0 (Clear) or 1 (Almost Clear) AND at Least a 2-grade Reduction From Baseline at Week 16 in the Subset of Participants With Psoriatic Skin Lesions at Baseline
IGA measured the overall severity of PSO using the following 5-point scale and score was rated as 0 = clear (No signs of PSO; post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation may be present), 1 = almost clear (No thickening; normal to pink coloration; no to minimal focal scaling), 2 = mild (Just detectable to mild thickening; pink to light red coloration; predominately fine scaling), 3 = moderate (Clearly distinguishable to moderate thickening; dull to bright red, moderate scaling), and 4 = severe (Severe thickening with hard edges; bright to deep dark red coloration; severe/coarse scaling covering almost all or all lesions). The IGA response is defined as score of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear) with at least a 2-category improvement relative to Baseline.
Measured: Baseline, Week 16
Change From Baseline in the Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain (PtAAP) at Week 16
The PtAAP VAS is part of the American College of Rheumatology core set of measures in arthritis. Participants assessed their arthritis pain using a VAS ranging from 0 (no pain) to 100 (most severe pain). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Measured: Baseline, Week 16
Percentage of Participants With an Enthesitis-free State Based on the Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) Index at Week 16 in the Subgroup of Participants With Enthesitis at Baseline
Presence of enthesitis was assessed in the subgroup of participants with enthesitis at Baseline. The SPARCC index measures the severity of enthesitis through the assessment of 16 sites, 8 for the right part and 8 for the left part of the body: the greater trochanter (right/left), quadriceps tendon insertion into the patella (right/left), patellar ligament insertion into the patella and tibial tuberosity (right/left), achilles tendon insertion (right/left), plantar fascia insertion (right/left), medial and lateral epicondyles (right/left), and the supraspinatus insertion (right/left). Tenderness on examination is recorded as either present (1) or absent (0) for each of the 16 sites, for an average range of 0 (no enthesitis) to 16 (severe enthesitis).
Measured: Baseline, Week 16
Change From Baseline in Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease-12 (PsAID-12) Total Score at Week 16
The PsAID-12 is a patient-reported outcome measure for assessing the impact of Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) in 12 physical and psychological domains, including pain, fatigue, skin problems, work and/or leisure activities, functional capacity, discomfort, sleep disturbance, coping, anxiety/fear/uncertainty, embarrassment and/or shame, social participation, and depression. Each domain is assessed with a single question using a 0 to 10 numerical rating scale. Each domain score was multiplied by a weighting factor and the results were then summed to provide the total score. The total score ranged from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating a worse status. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Measured: Baseline, Week 16
Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During the Study
An Adverse Event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation participants administered a pharmaceutical product, which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE could therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product, whether or not related to the medicinal (investigational) product. TEAEs were defined as any AEs with an onset date on or after the date of first IMP administration and within 140 days after the final dose of IMP.
Measured: From Baseline until Safety Follow-Up (up to Week 72)
Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the Study
A SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: Results in death, is life-threatening, requires in patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; is a congenital anomaly or birth defect; is an infection that requires treatment parenteral antibiotics, other important medical events which based on medical or scientific judgement may jeopardize the patients, or may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent any of the above. TEAEs were defined as any AEs with an onset date on or after the date of first IMP administration and within 140 days after the final dose of IMP.
Measured: From Baseline until Safety Follow-Up (up to Week 72)
Percentage of Participants With TEAEs Leading to Withdrawal From IMP During the Study
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation participants administered a pharmaceutical product, which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE could therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product, whether or not related to the medicinal (investigational) product. TEAEs were defined as any AEs with an onset date on or after the date of first IMP administration and within 140 days after the final dose of IMP.
Measured: From Baseline until Safety Follow-Up (up to Week 72)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted29 Mar 2019
- Study start3 Apr 2019
- Primary completion17 Aug 2021
- Study completion11 Jul 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (20)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Psoriatic ArthritisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by UCB Biopharma SRLThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 852 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- UCB Biopharma SRL
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- UCB Cares, Study director, 001 844 599 2273
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03895203
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PA0010
- Other IDs
- 2017-002322-20, 2017
- Acronym
- BE OPTIMAL
- Status last verified
- Aug 2026
- First submitted
- 27 Mar 2019
- Last updated
- 28 Sep 2026
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Data from this trial may be requested by qualified researchers six months after product approval in the US and/or Europe, or global development is discontinued, and 18 months after trial completion. Investigators may request access to anonymized individual patient-level data and redacted trial documents which may include: analysis-ready datasets, study protocol, annotated case report form, statistical analysis plan, dataset specifications, and clinical study report. Prior to use of the data, proposals need to be approved by an independent review panel at www.Vivli.org and a signed data sharing agreement will need to be executed. All documents are available in English only, for a pre-specified time, typically 12 months, on a password protected portal. This plan may change if the risk of re-identifying trial participants is determined to be too high after the trial is completed; in this case and to protect participants, individual patient-level data would not be made available.
Publications
Ritchlin CT, Coates LC, McInnes IB, Mease PJ, Merola JF, Tanaka Y, Asahina A, Gossec L, Gottlieb AB, Warren RB, Ink B, Bajracharya R, Shende V, Coarse J, Landewe RB. Bimekizumab treatment in biologic DMARD-naive patients with active psoriatic arthritis: 52-week efficacy and safety results from the phase III, randomised, placebo-controlled, active reference BE OPTIMAL study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2023 Nov;82(11):1404-1414. doi: 10.1136/ard-2023-224431. Epub 2023 Sep 11.
PubMed 37696588Mease PJ, Warren RB, Nash P, Grouin JM, Lyris N, Willems D, Taieb V, Eells J, McInnes IB. Comparative Effectiveness of Bimekizumab and Secukinumab in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis at 52 Weeks Using a Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison. Rheumatol Ther. 2024 Jun;11(3):817-828. doi: 10.1007/s40744-024-00652-7. Epub 2024 Mar 6.
PubMed 38446397Kristensen LE, Tillett W, Nash P, Coates LC, Mease PJ, Ogdie A, Gisondi P, Ink B, Prickett AR, Bajracharya R, Taieb V, Lyris N, Lambert J, Walsh JA. Association of achieving clinical disease control criteria and patient-reported outcomes in bimekizumab-treated patients with active psoriatic arthritis: results from two phase III studies. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2024 Nov 11;16:1759720X241288071. doi: 10.1177/1759720X241288071. eCollection 2024.
PubMed 39534481Mease PJ, Merola JF, Tanaka Y, Gossec L, McInnes IB, Ritchlin CT, Landewe RBM, Asahina A, Ink B, Heinrichs A, Bajracharya R, Shende V, Coarse J, Coates LC. Summary of Research: Safety and Efficacy of Bimekizumab in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis: 2-Year Results from Two Phase 3 Studies. Rheumatol Ther. 2025 Aug;12(4):609-612. doi: 10.1007/s40744-025-00764-8. Epub 2025 May 10.
PubMed 40347389Thaci D, Asahina A, Boehncke WH, Gottlieb AB, Lebwohl M, Warren RB, Edens H, Ink B, Bajracharya R, Coarse J, Merola JF. Bimekizumab Efficacy and Safety in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis with Substantial Skin and Nail Psoriasis to 1 Year. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2026 Feb;16(2):953-976. doi: 10.1007/s13555-025-01599-5. Epub 2025 Dec 12.
PubMed 41381988Gossec L, Coates LC, Landewe RBM, Mease PJ, Merola JF, Ritchlin CT, Tanaka Y, Asahina A, Proft F, Goldammer N, Manente M, Ink B, Bajracharya R, Coarse J, McInnes IB. Bimekizumab safety and efficacy in patients with psoriatic arthritis: 3-year results from two phase 3 studies. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2026 May 5;65(5):keag118. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keag118.
PubMed 41838419Gossec L, Tillett W, Coates LC, Mease PJ, de Wit M, Gladman DD, Orbai AM, Proft F, Ink B, Bajracharya R, Lambert J, Healy P, Husni ME. Control of Inflammation and Sustained Improvements in Patient-Reported Outcomes in Patients With Psoriatic Arthritis: Bimekizumab Two-Year Results From Two Phase 3 Studies. ACR Open Rheumatol. 2026 May;8(5):e90053. doi: 10.1002/acr2.90053.
PubMed 42152504Nikiphorou E, Tillett W, Deodhar A, Dubreuil M, Gossec L, Hwang M, Lubrano E, Machado PM, Rudwaleit M, de Wit M, Kavanagh S, de la Loge C, Ink B, Lambert J, Morup M, Boonen A, Walsh J. Effect of Bimekizumab Treatment on Health Status, Work Productivity, and Productivity Costs Through 3 Years in Axial Spondyloarthritis and Psoriatic Arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2026 Aug 1:jrheum.2026-0104. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.2026-0104. Online ahead of print.
PubMed 42386286Deodhar A, Gottlieb AB, Merola JF, Soriano ER, Coates LC, Ink B, Bajracharya R, Healy P, Mease PJ. Bimekizumab efficacy across GRAPPA domains to 3 years in patients with psoriatic arthritis: a post hoc analysis of two phase 3 studies. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2026 Oct 10:keag557. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keag557. Online ahead of print.
PubMed 42860055Mease PJ, Merola JF, Magrey M, Nash P, Poddubnyy D, Lebwohl M, Bajracharya R, Ink B, Marten A, Manente M, Peterson L, White K, Gensler LS. Bimekizumab longer-term safety profile in adult patients with axial spondyloarthritis or psoriatic arthritis: an updated analysis of six phase IIb/III clinical studies. RMD Open. 2026 Mar 10;12(1):e006174. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2025-006174.
PubMed 41807031Mease PJ, Gensler LS, Orbai AM, Warren RB, Bajracharya R, Ink B, Marten A, Massow U, Shende V, Manente M, Peterson L, White K, Landewe R, Poddubnyy D. Long-term safety of bimekizumab in adult patients with axial spondyloarthritis or psoriatic arthritis: pooled results from integrated phase IIb/III clinical studies. RMD Open. 2025 Apr 6;11(2):e005026. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2024-005026.
PubMed 40194794Gladman DD, Mease PJ, Gossec L, Husni ME, Gottlieb AB, Ink B, Bajracharya R, Coarse J, Lyris N, Lambert J, Tillett W. Effect of Bimekizumab on Patient-Reported Outcomes and Work Productivity in Patients With Psoriatic Arthritis: 1-Year Results From 2 Phase III Studies. J Rheumatol. 2025 May 1;52(5):466-478. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.2024-0923.
PubMed 39892885Husni ME, Mease PJ, Merola JF, Tillett W, Goldammer N, Ink B, Coarse J, Lambert J, Taieb V, Gladman DD. Bimekizumab provided rapid improvements in patient-reported symptoms and health-related quality of life in patients with active psoriatic arthritis: pooled 16-week results from two phase 3 studies. RMD Open. 2024 Sep 23;10(3):e004464. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2024-004464.
PubMed 39313302Mease PJ, Merola JF, Tanaka Y, Gossec L, McInnes IB, Ritchlin CT, Landewe RBM, Asahina A, Ink B, Heinrichs A, Bajracharya R, Shende V, Coarse J, Coates LC. Safety and Efficacy of Bimekizumab in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis: 2-Year Results from Two Phase 3 Studies. Rheumatol Ther. 2024 Oct;11(5):1363-1382. doi: 10.1007/s40744-024-00708-8. Epub 2024 Aug 31.
PubMed 39215949Mease PJ, Warren RB, Nash P, Grouin JM, Lyris N, Willems D, Taieb V, Eells J, McInnes IB. Comparative Effectiveness of Bimekizumab and Risankizumab in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis at 52 Weeks Assessed Using a Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison. Rheumatol Ther. 2024 Oct;11(5):1403-1412. doi: 10.1007/s40744-024-00706-w. Epub 2024 Aug 9.
PubMed 39120849
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 Sep 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Active Reference (Adalimumab) Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Bimekizumab in the Treatment of Subjects With Active Psoriatic Arthritis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03895203
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- BE OPTIMAL / PA0010
- Conditions
- Psoriatic Arthritis
- Keywords
- Psoriatic Arthritis, PsA, Bimekizumab
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 852 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- UCB Biopharma SRLIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 3 Apr 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 17 Aug 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 11 Jul 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 29 Mar 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 23 Oct 2024
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a study to demonstrate the clinical efficacy, safety and tolerability of bimekizumab administered subcutaneously (sc) compared with placebo in the treatment of subjects with active Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Bimekzumab dosage regimen | Experimental | Drug: Bimekizumab, Other: PlaceboSubjects randomized to this arm will receive assigned bimekizumab dosage regimen and placebo to maintain the blinding with adalimumab and placebo arms during the Treatment Period. |
| Adalimumab dosage regimen | Active comparator | Drug: AdalimumabSubjects randomized to this arm will receive the assigned adalimumab dosage regimen during the Treatment Period. |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: Bimekizumab, Other: PlaceboSubjects randomized to this arm will receive placebo during the Double-Blind Treatment Period and will be reallocated to receive bimekizumab dosage regimen during the Maintenance Period. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- An Institutional Review Board (IRB)/Independent Ethics Committee (IEC) approved written Informed Consent form is signed and dated by the subject
- Subject is male or female at least 18 years of age
- Female subject must be postmenopausal, permanently sterilized or willing to use a highly effective method of contraception
- Documented diagnosis of adult-onset Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) meeting the Classification Criteria for Psoriatic Arthritis (CASPAR) for at least 6 months prior to Screening with active PsA and must have at Baseline tender joint count (TJC) >=3 out of 68 and swollen joint count (SJC) >=3 out of 66
- Subject must be negative for rheumatoid factor and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (CCP) antibodies
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Female subjects who are breastfeeding, pregnant, or plan to become pregnant during the study
- Subjects with current or prior exposure to any biologics for the treatment of Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) or Psoriasis (PSO)
- Subject has an active infection or a history of recent serious infections
- Subject has known tuberculosis (TB) infection, is at high risk of acquiring TB infection, or has current or history of nontuberculous mycobacterium (NTMB) infection
- Subject has a diagnosis of inflammatory conditions other than PSO or PsA. Subjects with a diagnosis of Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, or other inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are allowed as long as they have no active symptomatic disease at Screening or Baseline
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| BimekizumabAlso: BKZ, UCB4940Subjects will receive bimekizumab at pre-specified time-points. | Drug | Bimekzumab dosage regimen, Placebo |
| AdalimumabAlso: HUMIRA®Adalimumab will be administered according to the labeling recommendations. | Drug | Adalimumab dosage regimen |
| PlaceboAlso: PBOSubjects will receive placebo at pre-specified time-points. | Other | Bimekzumab dosage regimen, Placebo |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 50 Response at Week 16
Time frame: Week 16
ACR50 response rate: 50% or greater improvement of arthritis relative to Baseline. Those who met following 3 conditions for improvement from Baseline were classified as meeting ACR50 response criteria: greater than or equal (≥) 50% improvement in 68-tender joint count; ≥ 50% improvement in 66-swollen joint count; ≥ 50% improvement in at least 3 of 5 following parameters: Physician global assessment of disease activity (0-100 millimeter [mm] visual analog scale [VAS] [0 = no symptoms;100 = severe symptoms]), Patient global assessment of disease activity (100 mm VAS [0 = no limitation of normal activities; 100 = very poor]), Patient assessment of pain (100 mm VAS [0 = no pain; 100 = most severe pain]), Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) assessed degree of difficulty experienced in 8 domains of daily living activities (20 questions), total score (0-3) computed from item scores, lower scores indicated less disability and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP).
19 secondary outcomes
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 16 for Placebo and BKZ
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16
Percentage of Participants With a Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) 90 Response at Week 4 in the Subgroup of Participants With Psoriasis (PSO) Involving at Least 3% Body Surface Area (BSA) at Baseline
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4
Percentage of Participants With a PASI90 Response at Week 16 in the Subgroup of Participants With PSO Involving at Least 3% BSA at Baseline
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16
Change From Baseline in the Short Form 36-item Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) at Week 16 for Placebo and BKZ
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16
Percentage of Participants With a Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) at Week 16
Time frame: Week 16
Change From Baseline in Van Der Heijde Modified Total Sharp Score (vdHmTSS) in Participants With Elevated Hs-CRP and/or at Least 1 Bone Erosion at Baseline at Week 16 for Placebo and BKZ
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16
Percentage of Participants With an Enthesitis-free State in the Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI) at Week 16 in the Subgroup of Participants With Enthesitis at Baseline in the Pooled Population of PA0010 and PA0011
Time frame: Baseline of PA0010 for Participants of PA0010 and Baseline of PA0011 for Participants of PA0011, Week 16
Percentage of Participants With a Dactylitis-free State Based on the Leeds Dactylitis Index (LDI) at Week 16 in the Subgroup of Participants With Dactylitis at Baseline in the Pooled Population of PA0010 and PA0011
Time frame: Baseline of PA0010 for Participants of PA0010 and Baseline of PA0011 for Participants of PA0011, Week 16
Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 Response at Week 16
Time frame: Week 16
Change From Baseline in Van Der Heijde Modified Total Sharp Score (vdHmTSS) in the Overall Population at Week 16 for Placebo and BKZ
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16
Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 70 Response at Week 16
Time frame: Week 16
Percentage of Participants With Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) Response Defined as Score of 0 (Clear) or 1 (Almost Clear) AND at Least a 2-grade Reduction From Baseline at Week 4 in the Subset of Participants With Psoriatic Skin Lesions at Baseline
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4
Percentage of Participants With an IGA Response Defined as Score of 0 (Clear) or 1 (Almost Clear) AND at Least a 2-grade Reduction From Baseline at Week 16 in the Subset of Participants With Psoriatic Skin Lesions at Baseline
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16
Change From Baseline in the Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain (PtAAP) at Week 16
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16
Percentage of Participants With an Enthesitis-free State Based on the Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) Index at Week 16 in the Subgroup of Participants With Enthesitis at Baseline
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16
Change From Baseline in Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease-12 (PsAID-12) Total Score at Week 16
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16
Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During the Study
Time frame: From Baseline until Safety Follow-Up (up to Week 72)
Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the Study
Time frame: From Baseline until Safety Follow-Up (up to Week 72)
Percentage of Participants With TEAEs Leading to Withdrawal From IMP During the Study
Time frame: From Baseline until Safety Follow-Up (up to Week 72)
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 Sep 2026.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Results publication: PubMed 37696588Ritchlin CT, Coates LC, McInnes IB, Mease PJ, Merola JF, Tanaka Y, Asahina A, Gossec L, Gottlieb AB, Warren RB, Ink B, Bajracharya R, Shende V, Coarse J, Landewe RB. Bimekizumab treatment in biologic DMARD-naive patients with active psoriatic arthritis: 52-week efficacy and safety results from the phase III, randomised, placebo-controlled, active reference BE OPTIMAL study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2023 Nov;82(11):1404-1414. doi: 10.1136/ard-2023-224431. Epub 2023 Sep 11.
- Results publication: PubMed 38446397Mease PJ, Warren RB, Nash P, Grouin JM, Lyris N, Willems D, Taieb V, Eells J, McInnes IB. Comparative Effectiveness of Bimekizumab and Secukinumab in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis at 52 Weeks Using a Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison. Rheumatol Ther. 2024 Jun;11(3):817-828. doi: 10.1007/s40744-024-00652-7. Epub 2024 Mar 6.
- Results publication: PubMed 39534481Kristensen LE, Tillett W, Nash P, Coates LC, Mease PJ, Ogdie A, Gisondi P, Ink B, Prickett AR, Bajracharya R, Taieb V, Lyris N, Lambert J, Walsh JA. Association of achieving clinical disease control criteria and patient-reported outcomes in bimekizumab-treated patients with active psoriatic arthritis: results from two phase III studies. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2024 Nov 11;16:1759720X241288071. doi: 10.1177/1759720X241288071. eCollection 2024.
- Results publication: PubMed 40347389Mease PJ, Merola JF, Tanaka Y, Gossec L, McInnes IB, Ritchlin CT, Landewe RBM, Asahina A, Ink B, Heinrichs A, Bajracharya R, Shende V, Coarse J, Coates LC. Summary of Research: Safety and Efficacy of Bimekizumab in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis: 2-Year Results from Two Phase 3 Studies. Rheumatol Ther. 2025 Aug;12(4):609-612. doi: 10.1007/s40744-025-00764-8. Epub 2025 May 10.
- Results publication: PubMed 41381988Thaci D, Asahina A, Boehncke WH, Gottlieb AB, Lebwohl M, Warren RB, Edens H, Ink B, Bajracharya R, Coarse J, Merola JF. Bimekizumab Efficacy and Safety in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis with Substantial Skin and Nail Psoriasis to 1 Year. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2026 Feb;16(2):953-976. doi: 10.1007/s13555-025-01599-5. Epub 2025 Dec 12.
- Results publication: PubMed 41838419Gossec L, Coates LC, Landewe RBM, Mease PJ, Merola JF, Ritchlin CT, Tanaka Y, Asahina A, Proft F, Goldammer N, Manente M, Ink B, Bajracharya R, Coarse J, McInnes IB. Bimekizumab safety and efficacy in patients with psoriatic arthritis: 3-year results from two phase 3 studies. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2026 May 5;65(5):keag118. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keag118.
- Results publication: PubMed 42152504Gossec L, Tillett W, Coates LC, Mease PJ, de Wit M, Gladman DD, Orbai AM, Proft F, Ink B, Bajracharya R, Lambert J, Healy P, Husni ME. Control of Inflammation and Sustained Improvements in Patient-Reported Outcomes in Patients With Psoriatic Arthritis: Bimekizumab Two-Year Results From Two Phase 3 Studies. ACR Open Rheumatol. 2026 May;8(5):e90053. doi: 10.1002/acr2.90053.
- Results publication: PubMed 42386286Nikiphorou E, Tillett W, Deodhar A, Dubreuil M, Gossec L, Hwang M, Lubrano E, Machado PM, Rudwaleit M, de Wit M, Kavanagh S, de la Loge C, Ink B, Lambert J, Morup M, Boonen A, Walsh J. Effect of Bimekizumab Treatment on Health Status, Work Productivity, and Productivity Costs Through 3 Years in Axial Spondyloarthritis and Psoriatic Arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2026 Aug 1:jrheum.2026-0104. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.2026-0104. Online ahead of print.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 42860055Deodhar A, Gottlieb AB, Merola JF, Soriano ER, Coates LC, Ink B, Bajracharya R, Healy P, Mease PJ. Bimekizumab efficacy across GRAPPA domains to 3 years in patients with psoriatic arthritis: a post hoc analysis of two phase 3 studies. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2026 Oct 10:keag557. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keag557. Online ahead of print.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41807031Mease PJ, Merola JF, Magrey M, Nash P, Poddubnyy D, Lebwohl M, Bajracharya R, Ink B, Marten A, Manente M, Peterson L, White K, Gensler LS. Bimekizumab longer-term safety profile in adult patients with axial spondyloarthritis or psoriatic arthritis: an updated analysis of six phase IIb/III clinical studies. RMD Open. 2026 Mar 10;12(1):e006174. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2025-006174.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40194794Mease PJ, Gensler LS, Orbai AM, Warren RB, Bajracharya R, Ink B, Marten A, Massow U, Shende V, Manente M, Peterson L, White K, Landewe R, Poddubnyy D. Long-term safety of bimekizumab in adult patients with axial spondyloarthritis or psoriatic arthritis: pooled results from integrated phase IIb/III clinical studies. RMD Open. 2025 Apr 6;11(2):e005026. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2024-005026.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39892885Gladman DD, Mease PJ, Gossec L, Husni ME, Gottlieb AB, Ink B, Bajracharya R, Coarse J, Lyris N, Lambert J, Tillett W. Effect of Bimekizumab on Patient-Reported Outcomes and Work Productivity in Patients With Psoriatic Arthritis: 1-Year Results From 2 Phase III Studies. J Rheumatol. 2025 May 1;52(5):466-478. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.2024-0923.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Data from this trial may be requested by qualified researchers six months after product approval in the US and/or Europe, or global development is discontinued, and 18 months after trial completion. Investigators may request access to anonymized individual patient-level data and redacted trial documents which may include: analysis-ready datasets, study protocol, annotated case report form, statistical analysis plan, dataset specifications, and clinical study report. Prior to use of the data, proposals need to be approved by an independent review panel at www.Vivli.org and a signed data sharing agreement will need to be executed. All documents are available in English only, for a pre-specified time, typically 12 months, on a password protected portal. This plan may change if the risk of re-identifying trial participants is determined to be too high after the trial is completed; in this case and to protect participants, individual patient-level data would not be made available.
Related trials for Psoriatic Arthritis
RecruitingPhase 3
An Open-label Study to Evaluate the Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Bimekizumab in Pediatric Study Participants With Active Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis Subtypes Enthesitis-related Arthritis (Including Juvenile-onset Ankylosing Spondylitis) and Juvenile Psoriatic Arthritis
Enthesitis-related Arthritis, Juvenile Psoriatic Arthritis
Enrolling by invitation
Combined High-Intensity Aerobic Training and Resistance Training in Psoriatic Arthritis
Psoriatic Arthritis
Not yet recruiting
Definition of Novel Optoacoustic Biomarkers of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis
Psoriasis (PsO), Psoriasis Arthritis
RecruitingObservational study
Observational Study of Pediatric Rheumatic Diseases: The CARRA Registry
Rheumatic Joint Disease
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Study to Evaluate Tulisokibart in Adults With Psoriatic Arthritis (MK-7240-015)
Psoriatic Arthritis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
UCB Cares study director
001 844 599 2273
136 sites in 14 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Bimekizumab and Adalimumab in people with Psoriatic Arthritis, run by UCB Biopharma SRL at 136 sites in 14 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 136 sites in United States, Poland, Russia, Japan, Germany and 9 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 23 Oct 2024). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 50 Response at Week 16 (time frame: Week 16). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03895203, which also lists 20 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Sep 2026.