Breakthrough Cancer PainOASISNCT03895762
Observational Study of Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Fentanyl in Korean Cancer Patients
An observational study of Breakthrough Cancer Pain, run by A.Menarini Asia-Pacific Holdings Pte Ltd at 1 site in South Korea.
Trial summary
The purpose of this observational study is: To observe the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of Abstral ODT for the alleviation of breakthrough cancer pain in Korean patients with various cancers in real-world clinical settings and supplement and expand the previous cross-sectional survey results. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 19 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Breakthrough Cancer Pain
- What is being tested?
- Abstral Oral Disintegrating Tablet (ODT)
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- How many people
- 143 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSouth Korea
- Study dates
- 4 Jul 2017to 28 Jun 2019
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 19 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients who have been regularly on treatment with opioids for cancer pain from before study initiation and have no prior treatment with Abstral ODT within 30 days prior to study initiation.
Who may be able to join
- Korean male and female adults at the age of 19 or older
- In patient with Breakthrough cancer pain in inpatient or outpatient settings,
- Patient with minimally 1 attack per day for the last week
- Uncontrolled Breakthrough cancer pain patient with previous treatment with other fentanyl based on Invenstigator's judgment or patient who had not satisfied with previous treatment with other fentanyl at patient's request
- Patient with opioid tolerance (treatment with at least 60 ㎎/day oral morphine, at least 25 mcg/hour transdermal fentanyl, at least 30 ㎎/day oxycodone, at least 8 ㎎/day oral hydromorphone, or other opioids at equivalent analgesic doses for 1 week or longer)
- Patient who has been on opioids for the treatment of background cancer pain
- Patient who did not administer Abstral ODT within 1 month prior to the baseline visit
- Patient who signs the data release consent to data use.
Who cannot join
- Patient for whom Abstral ODT is contraindicated based on its summary of product characteristics
- Patient who is considered by the investigator to be ineligible for study participation for other reasons
- Patient who is participating or participated in an opioid related clinical trial within 30 days prior to the baseline visit
- Patient with neuropathic pain attacks
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: An Observational Study to Assess the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Abstral Oral Disintegrating Tablet (ODT) for the Management of Breakthrough Cancer Pain in Korean Cancer Patients
The purpose of this observational study is:
To observe the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of Abstral ODT for the alleviation of breakthrough cancer pain in Korean patients with various cancers in real-world clinical settings and supplement and expand the previous cross-sectional survey results.
Read the detailed description
This is a multicenter, non-interventional, single-arm, non-randomized observational study designed to collect the efficacy, safety, and tolerability data of Abstral ODT for the treatment of breakthrough cancer pain in cancer patients in real-world outpatient and inpatient clinical settings.
As the purpose of this study is to investigate the efficacy and safety of Abstral ODT in routine clinical practice, drug prescription and treatment will be determined according to the medical judgment of the investigator, regardless of enrollment to this study. During the patient's visit to the institution, Abstral ODT will be prescribed according to the judgment of the investigator, and study participation will be suggested for this patient. Whether to participate in this study or not will not affect the patient's treatment (physician's prescription or diagnostic and therapeutic decision).
Due to the non-interventional observational nature of this study, there will be no visits or procedures to be performed mandatorily according to the protocol, and data will be collected at Week 1 (±3 days), Week 4 (±1 week), and Week 12 (±4 weeks) from the baseline visit according to the circumstances of clinical practice.
Status of successful dose titration for Abstral ODT will be determined according to the criteria in which dose titration is deemed successful when all of the following are met, and ineffective when one of the following is not met: no additional dose is administered within 2 h of administration of Abstral ODT during maintenance phase; Numeric Rating Scale scores at 30 and 60 min after administration is reduced by ≥2; adverse drug reactions are tolerable for the subject.The overall procedures of this study are as follows.
- Conditions
- Breakthrough Cancer Pain
- Being tested
- Abstral Oral Disintegrating Tablet (ODT)
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Abstral Oral Disintegrating Tablet (ODT)Drug
Also called Fentanyl
Opioid(Fentanyl)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Abstral Oral Disintegrating Tablet (ODT) | Abstral Oral Disintegrating Tablet (ODT) Receives: Drug: Abstral Oral Disintegrating Tablet (ODT) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Subjects of successful dose titration
Status of successful dose titration. Titration is considered successful when all of the following are met, and ineffective when one of the following is not met:
- No additional dose is administered within 2 h of administration of Abstral ODT during maintenance phase;
- Numeric Rating Scale scores at 30 mins after administration is reduced by ≥2; Numeric Rating Scale is to measure pain intensity in subject by verbally responding to a 10-point Numeric Rating Scale (0=no pain and 10=worst possible pain in total range)
- Adverse drug reactions are tolerable for the subject.
Measured: week 1
Number of Subjects of successful dose titration
Status of successful dose titration. Titration is considered successful when all of the following are met, and ineffective when one of the following is not met:
- No additional dose is administered within 2 h of administration of Abstral ODT during maintenance phase;
- Numeric Rating Scale scores at 30 mins after administration is reduced by ≥2; Numeric Rating Scale is to measure pain intensity in subject by verbally responding to a 10-point Numeric Rating Scale (0=no pain and 10=worst possible pain in total range)
- Adverse drug reactions are tolerable for the subject.
Measured: week 4
Number of Subjects of successful dose titration
Status of successful dose titration. Titration is considered successful when all of the following are met, and ineffective when one of the following is not met:
- No additional dose is administered within 2 h of administration of Abstral ODT during maintenance phase;
- Numeric Rating Scale scores at 30 mins after administration is reduced by ≥2; Numeric Rating Scale is to measure pain intensity in subject by verbally responding to a 10-point Numeric Rating Scale (0=no pain and 10=worst possible pain in total range)
- Adverse drug reactions are tolerable for the subject.
Measured: week 12
Secondary outcomes (7)
Status of achievement of Numeric Rating Scale goal
Status of achievement of Numeric Rating Scale goal set by each subject
Numeric Rating Scale is to measure pain intensity in subject by verbally responding to a 10-point Numeric Rating Scale (0=no pain and 10=worst possible pain in total range)
Measured: week 1
Abstral ODT maintenance dose
Abstral ODT maintenance dose at Week 4 and 12 of treatment, and after dose titration
Data will be collected at Week 1 (±3 days), Week 4 (±1 week), and Week 12 (±4 weeks) from the baseline visit according to the circumstances of clinical practice.
Measured: week 1(dose titration)
Abstral ODT maintenance dose
Abstral ODT maintenance dose at Week 4 and 12 of treatment, and after dose titration
Data will be collected at Week 1 (±3 days), Week 4 (±1 week), and Week 12 (±4 weeks) from the baseline visit according to the circumstances of clinical practice.
Measured: week 4
Abstral ODT maintenance dose
Abstral ODT maintenance dose at Week 4 and 12 of treatment, and after dose titration
Data will be collected at Week 1 (±3 days), Week 4 (±1 week), and Week 12 (±4 weeks) from the baseline visit according to the circumstances of clinical practice.
Measured: week 12
Brief Pain Inventory-Korean and Pain Diary values and changes
Brief Pain Inventory-Korean and Pain Diary values (maximum pain intensity of all incidences of breakthrough pain, pain intensity difference at 30min, pain intensity difference at 60 mins, quality of sleep, etc.) and changes. Brief Pain Inventory-Korean is to measure pain intensity in subject by verbally responding to a 10-point scale(0=no pain and 10=worst possible pain in total range)
Measured: week 1
Brief Pain Inventory-Korean and Pain Diary values and changes
Brief Pain Inventory-Korean and Pain Diary values (maximum pain intensity of all incidences of breakthrough pain, pain intensity difference at 30min, pain intensity difference at 60 mins, quality of sleep, etc.) and changes. Brief Pain Inventory-Korean is to measure pain intensity in subject by verbally responding to a 10-point scale(0=no pain and 10=worst possible pain in total range)
Measured: week 4
Brief Pain Inventory-Korean and Pain Diary values and changes
Brief Pain Inventory-Korean and Pain Diary values (maximum pain intensity of all incidences of breakthrough pain, pain intensity difference at 30min, pain intensity difference at 60 mins, quality of sleep, etc.) and changes. Brief Pain Inventory-Korean is to measure pain intensity in subject by verbally responding to a 10-point scale(0=no pain and 10=worst possible pain in total range)
Measured: week 12
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted29 Mar 2019
- Study start4 Jul 2017
- Primary completion28 Jun 2019
- Study completion28 Jun 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (18)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Breakthrough Cancer PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 143 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- A.Menarini Asia-Pacific Holdings Pte Ltd
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Jin-Seok Ahn, Principal investigator, Samsung Medical Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03895762
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- MAKR/16/Abs-Can/001
- Acronym
- OASIS
- Status last verified
- Apr 2022
- First submitted
- 15 Nov 2018
- Last updated
- 5 May 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Haugen DF, Hjermstad MJ, Hagen N, Caraceni A, Kaasa S; European Palliative Care Research Collaborative (EPCRC). Assessment and classification of cancer breakthrough pain: a systematic literature review. Pain. 2010 Jun;149(3):476-482. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.02.035. Epub 2010 Mar 16.
PubMed 20236762Davies AN, Dickman A, Reid C, Stevens AM, Zeppetella G; Science Committee of the Association for Palliative Medicine of Great Britain and Ireland. The management of cancer-related breakthrough pain: recommendations of a task group of the Science Committee of the Association for Palliative Medicine of Great Britain and Ireland. Eur J Pain. 2009 Apr;13(4):331-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2008.06.014. Epub 2008 Aug 15.
PubMed 18707904Corli O, Floriani I, Roberto A, Montanari M, Galli F, Greco MT, Caraceni A, Kaasa S, Dragani TA, Azzarello G, Luzzani M, Cavanna L, Bandieri E, Gamucci T, Lipari G, Di Gregorio R, Valenti D, Reale C, Pavesi L, Iorno V, Crispino C, Pacchioni M, Apolone G; CERP STUDY OF PAIN GROUP (List of collaborators). Are strong opioids equally effective and safe in the treatment of chronic cancer pain? A multicenter randomized phase IV 'real life' trial on the variability of response to opioids. Ann Oncol. 2016 Jun;27(6):1107-1115. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdw097. Epub 2016 Mar 2.
PubMed 26940689Deandrea S, Corli O, Consonni D, Villani W, Greco MT, Apolone G. Prevalence of breakthrough cancer pain: a systematic review and a pooled analysis of published literature. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2014 Jan;47(1):57-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2013.02.015. Epub 2013 Jun 21.
PubMed 23796584Portenoy RK, Hagen NA. Breakthrough pain: definition, prevalence and characteristics. Pain. 1990 Jun;41(3):273-281. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(90)90004-W.
PubMed 1697056Portenoy RK, Payne D, Jacobsen P. Breakthrough pain: characteristics and impact in patients with cancer pain. Pain. 1999 May;81(1-2):129-34. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3959(99)00006-8.
PubMed 10353500Portenoy RK, Hagen NA. Breakthrough pain: definition and management. Oncology (Williston Park). 1989 Aug;3(8 Suppl):25-9.
PubMed 2484297Zeppetella G, O'Doherty CA, Collins S. Prevalence and characteristics of breakthrough pain in cancer patients admitted to a hospice. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2000 Aug;20(2):87-92. doi: 10.1016/s0885-3924(00)00161-5.
PubMed 10989246Hong SH, Roh SY, Kim SY, Shin SW, Kim CS, Choi JH, Kim SY, Yim CY, Sohn CH, Song HS, Hong YS. Change in cancer pain management in Korea between 2001 and 2006: results of two nationwide surveys. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2011 Jan;41(1):93-103. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2010.03.025. Epub 2010 Sep 26.
PubMed 20870388Caraceni A, Martini C, Zecca E, Portenoy RK, Ashby MA, Hawson G, Jackson KA, Lickiss N, Muirden N, Pisasale M, Moulin D, Schulz VN, Rico Pazo MA, Serrano JA, Andersen H, Henriksen HT, Mejholm I, Sjogren P, Heiskanen T, Kalso E, Pere P, Poyhia R, Vuorinen E, Tigerstedt I, Ruismaki P, Bertolino M, Larue F, Ranchere JY, Hege-Scheuing G, Bowdler I, Helbing F, Kostner E, Radbruch L, Kastrinaki K, Shah S, Vijayaram S, Sharma KS, Devi PS, Jain PN, Ramamani PV, Beny A, Brunelli C, Maltoni M, Mercadante S, Plancarte R, Schug S, Engstrand P, Ovalle AF, Wang X, Alves MF, Abrunhosa MR, Sun WZ, Zhang L, Gazizov A, Vaisman M, Rudoy S, Gomez Sancho M, Vila P, Trelis J, Chaudakshetrin P, Koh ML, Van Dongen RT, Vielvoye-Kerkmeer A, Boswell MV, Elliott T, Hargus E, Lutz L; Working Group of an IASP Task Force on Cancer Pain. Breakthrough pain characteristics and syndromes in patients with cancer pain. An international survey. Palliat Med. 2004 Apr;18(3):177-83. doi: 10.1191/0269216304pm890oa.
PubMed 15198130Boceta J, De la Torre A, Samper D, Farto M, Sanchez-de la Rosa R. Consensus and controversies in the definition, assessment, treatment and monitoring of BTcP: results of a Delphi study. Clin Transl Oncol. 2016 Nov;18(11):1088-1097. doi: 10.1007/s12094-016-1490-4.
PubMed 26856600Coluzzi PH. Cancer pain management: newer perspectives on opioids and episodic pain. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 1998 Jan-Feb;15(1):13-22. doi: 10.1177/104990919801500105.
PubMed 9468974Patt RB, Ellison NM. Breakthrough pain in cancer patients: characteristics, prevalence, and treatment. Oncology (Williston Park). 1998 Jul;12(7):1035-46; discussion 1049-52.
PubMed 9684277Coluzzi PH, Schwartzberg L, Conroy JD, Charapata S, Gay M, Busch MA, Chavez J, Ashley J, Lebo D, McCracken M, Portenoy RK. Breakthrough cancer pain: a randomized trial comparing oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate (OTFC) and morphine sulfate immediate release (MSIR). Pain. 2001 Mar;91(1-2):123-30. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3959(00)00427-9.
PubMed 11240084Lennernas B, Hedner T, Holmberg M, Bredenberg S, Nystrom C, Lennernas H. Pharmacokinetics and tolerability of different doses of fentanyl following sublingual administration of a rapidly dissolving tablet to cancer patients: a new approach to treatment of incident pain. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2005 Feb;59(2):249-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2004.02264.x.
PubMed 15676050
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 May 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- An Observational Study to Assess the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Abstral Oral Disintegrating Tablet (ODT) for the Management of Breakthrough Cancer Pain in Korean Cancer Patients
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03895762
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- OASIS / MAKR/16/Abs-Can/001
- Conditions
- Breakthrough Cancer Pain
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 143 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- A.Menarini Asia-Pacific Holdings Pte LtdIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 4 Jul 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 28 Jun 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 28 Jun 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 29 Mar 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this observational study is:
To observe the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of Abstral ODT for the alleviation of breakthrough cancer pain in Korean patients with various cancers in real-world clinical settings and supplement and expand the previous cross-sectional survey results.
Detailed description
This is a multicenter, non-interventional, single-arm, non-randomized observational study designed to collect the efficacy, safety, and tolerability data of Abstral ODT for the treatment of breakthrough cancer pain in cancer patients in real-world outpatient and inpatient clinical settings.
As the purpose of this study is to investigate the efficacy and safety of Abstral ODT in routine clinical practice, drug prescription and treatment will be determined according to the medical judgment of the investigator, regardless of enrollment to this study. During the patient's visit to the institution, Abstral ODT will be prescribed according to the judgment of the investigator, and study participation will be suggested for this patient. Whether to participate in this study or not will not affect the patient's treatment (physician's prescription or diagnostic and therapeutic decision).
Due to the non-interventional observational nature of this study, there will be no visits or procedures to be performed mandatorily according to the protocol, and data will be collected at Week 1 (±3 days), Week 4 (±1 week), and Week 12 (±4 weeks) from the baseline visit according to the circumstances of clinical practice.
Status of successful dose titration for Abstral ODT will be determined according to the criteria in which dose titration is deemed successful when all of the following are met, and ineffective when one of the following is not met: no additional dose is administered within 2 h of administration of Abstral ODT during maintenance phase; Numeric Rating Scale scores at 30 and 60 min after administration is reduced by ≥2; adverse drug reactions are tolerable for the subject.The overall procedures of this study are as follows.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Abstral Oral Disintegrating Tablet (ODT) | – | Drug: Abstral Oral Disintegrating Tablet (ODT)Abstral Oral Disintegrating Tablet (ODT) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 19 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients who have been regularly on treatment with opioids for cancer pain from before study initiation and have no prior treatment with Abstral ODT within 30 days prior to study initiation.
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Korean male and female adults at the age of 19 or older
- In patient with Breakthrough cancer pain in inpatient or outpatient settings,
- Patient with opioid tolerance (treatment with at least 60 ㎎/day oral morphine, at least 25 mcg/hour transdermal fentanyl, at least 30 ㎎/day oxycodone, at least 8 ㎎/day oral hydromorphone, or other opioids at equivalent analgesic doses for 1 week or longer)
- Patient who has been on opioids for the treatment of background cancer pain
- Patient who did not administer Abstral ODT within 1 month prior to the baseline visit
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Patient for whom Abstral ODT is contraindicated based on its summary of product characteristics
- Patient who is considered by the investigator to be ineligible for study participation for other reasons
- Patient who is participating or participated in an opioid related clinical trial within 30 days prior to the baseline visit
- Patient with neuropathic pain attacks
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Abstral Oral Disintegrating Tablet (ODT)Also: FentanylOpioid(Fentanyl) | Drug | Abstral Oral Disintegrating Tablet (ODT) |
Primary outcome
Number of Subjects of successful dose titration
Time frame: week 1
Status of successful dose titration. Titration is considered successful when all of the following are met, and ineffective when one of the following is not met: * No additional dose is administered within 2 h of administration of Abstral ODT during maintenance phase; * Numeric Rating Scale scores at 30 mins after administration is reduced by ≥2; Numeric Rating Scale is to measure pain intensity in subject by verbally responding to a 10-point Numeric Rating Scale (0=no pain and 10=worst possible pain in total range) * Adverse drug reactions are tolerable for the subject.
Number of Subjects of successful dose titration
Time frame: week 4
Status of successful dose titration. Titration is considered successful when all of the following are met, and ineffective when one of the following is not met: * No additional dose is administered within 2 h of administration of Abstral ODT during maintenance phase; * Numeric Rating Scale scores at 30 mins after administration is reduced by ≥2; Numeric Rating Scale is to measure pain intensity in subject by verbally responding to a 10-point Numeric Rating Scale (0=no pain and 10=worst possible pain in total range) * Adverse drug reactions are tolerable for the subject.
Number of Subjects of successful dose titration
Time frame: week 12
Status of successful dose titration. Titration is considered successful when all of the following are met, and ineffective when one of the following is not met: * No additional dose is administered within 2 h of administration of Abstral ODT during maintenance phase; * Numeric Rating Scale scores at 30 mins after administration is reduced by ≥2; Numeric Rating Scale is to measure pain intensity in subject by verbally responding to a 10-point Numeric Rating Scale (0=no pain and 10=worst possible pain in total range) * Adverse drug reactions are tolerable for the subject.
7 secondary outcomes
Status of achievement of Numeric Rating Scale goal
Time frame: week 1
Abstral ODT maintenance dose
Time frame: week 1(dose titration)
Abstral ODT maintenance dose
Time frame: week 4
Abstral ODT maintenance dose
Time frame: week 12
Brief Pain Inventory-Korean and Pain Diary values and changes
Time frame: week 1
Brief Pain Inventory-Korean and Pain Diary values and changes
Time frame: week 4
Brief Pain Inventory-Korean and Pain Diary values and changes
Time frame: week 12
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 May 2022.
- Background: PubMed 20236762Haugen DF, Hjermstad MJ, Hagen N, Caraceni A, Kaasa S; European Palliative Care Research Collaborative (EPCRC). Assessment and classification of cancer breakthrough pain: a systematic literature review. Pain. 2010 Jun;149(3):476-482. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.02.035. Epub 2010 Mar 16.
- Background: PubMed 18707904Davies AN, Dickman A, Reid C, Stevens AM, Zeppetella G; Science Committee of the Association for Palliative Medicine of Great Britain and Ireland. The management of cancer-related breakthrough pain: recommendations of a task group of the Science Committee of the Association for Palliative Medicine of Great Britain and Ireland. Eur J Pain. 2009 Apr;13(4):331-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2008.06.014. Epub 2008 Aug 15.
- Background: PubMed 26940689Corli O, Floriani I, Roberto A, Montanari M, Galli F, Greco MT, Caraceni A, Kaasa S, Dragani TA, Azzarello G, Luzzani M, Cavanna L, Bandieri E, Gamucci T, Lipari G, Di Gregorio R, Valenti D, Reale C, Pavesi L, Iorno V, Crispino C, Pacchioni M, Apolone G; CERP STUDY OF PAIN GROUP (List of collaborators). Are strong opioids equally effective and safe in the treatment of chronic cancer pain? A multicenter randomized phase IV 'real life' trial on the variability of response to opioids. Ann Oncol. 2016 Jun;27(6):1107-1115. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdw097. Epub 2016 Mar 2.
- Background: PubMed 23796584Deandrea S, Corli O, Consonni D, Villani W, Greco MT, Apolone G. Prevalence of breakthrough cancer pain: a systematic review and a pooled analysis of published literature. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2014 Jan;47(1):57-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2013.02.015. Epub 2013 Jun 21.
- Background: PubMed 1697056Portenoy RK, Hagen NA. Breakthrough pain: definition, prevalence and characteristics. Pain. 1990 Jun;41(3):273-281. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(90)90004-W.
- Background: PubMed 10353500Portenoy RK, Payne D, Jacobsen P. Breakthrough pain: characteristics and impact in patients with cancer pain. Pain. 1999 May;81(1-2):129-34. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3959(99)00006-8.
- Background: PubMed 2484297Portenoy RK, Hagen NA. Breakthrough pain: definition and management. Oncology (Williston Park). 1989 Aug;3(8 Suppl):25-9.
- Background: PubMed 10989246Zeppetella G, O'Doherty CA, Collins S. Prevalence and characteristics of breakthrough pain in cancer patients admitted to a hospice. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2000 Aug;20(2):87-92. doi: 10.1016/s0885-3924(00)00161-5.
- Background: PubMed 20870388Hong SH, Roh SY, Kim SY, Shin SW, Kim CS, Choi JH, Kim SY, Yim CY, Sohn CH, Song HS, Hong YS. Change in cancer pain management in Korea between 2001 and 2006: results of two nationwide surveys. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2011 Jan;41(1):93-103. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2010.03.025. Epub 2010 Sep 26.
- Background: PubMed 15198130Caraceni A, Martini C, Zecca E, Portenoy RK, Ashby MA, Hawson G, Jackson KA, Lickiss N, Muirden N, Pisasale M, Moulin D, Schulz VN, Rico Pazo MA, Serrano JA, Andersen H, Henriksen HT, Mejholm I, Sjogren P, Heiskanen T, Kalso E, Pere P, Poyhia R, Vuorinen E, Tigerstedt I, Ruismaki P, Bertolino M, Larue F, Ranchere JY, Hege-Scheuing G, Bowdler I, Helbing F, Kostner E, Radbruch L, Kastrinaki K, Shah S, Vijayaram S, Sharma KS, Devi PS, Jain PN, Ramamani PV, Beny A, Brunelli C, Maltoni M, Mercadante S, Plancarte R, Schug S, Engstrand P, Ovalle AF, Wang X, Alves MF, Abrunhosa MR, Sun WZ, Zhang L, Gazizov A, Vaisman M, Rudoy S, Gomez Sancho M, Vila P, Trelis J, Chaudakshetrin P, Koh ML, Van Dongen RT, Vielvoye-Kerkmeer A, Boswell MV, Elliott T, Hargus E, Lutz L; Working Group of an IASP Task Force on Cancer Pain. Breakthrough pain characteristics and syndromes in patients with cancer pain. An international survey. Palliat Med. 2004 Apr;18(3):177-83. doi: 10.1191/0269216304pm890oa.
- Background: PubMed 26856600Boceta J, De la Torre A, Samper D, Farto M, Sanchez-de la Rosa R. Consensus and controversies in the definition, assessment, treatment and monitoring of BTcP: results of a Delphi study. Clin Transl Oncol. 2016 Nov;18(11):1088-1097. doi: 10.1007/s12094-016-1490-4.
- Background: PubMed 9468974Coluzzi PH. Cancer pain management: newer perspectives on opioids and episodic pain. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 1998 Jan-Feb;15(1):13-22. doi: 10.1177/104990919801500105.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Breakthrough Cancer Pain
Recruiting
Doxepin Solution for Alleviation of Stubborn Breakthrough Pain Induced by Swallowing in Patients Receiving Radiotherapy for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
Swallowing-induced Pain
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Paediatric Breakthrough Pain Assessment
Breakthrough Pain, Palliative Medicine
RecruitingObservational study
A Real-world Observational Study of a Mucosal Contouring Method for Radiation-induced Oropharyngeal Mucositis
Radiation-induced Oropharyngeal Mucositis, Swallowing-induced Breakthrough Pain
RecruitingObservational study
A Mucosal Contouring Method Based on Swallowing-induced Breakthrough Pain for Radiation-induced Oropharyngeal Mucositis
Radiation-induced Oropharyngeal Mucositis, Swallowing-induced Breakthrough Pain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jin-Seok Ahn principal investigator
Samsung Medical Center
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Breakthrough Cancer Pain, run by A.Menarini Asia-Pacific Holdings Pte Ltd at 1 site in South Korea.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 May 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Subjects of successful dose titration (time frame: week 1). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03895762, which also lists 18 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 May 2022.