Psoriatic ArthritisPhase 3BE COMPLETENCT03896581
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Bimekizumab in the Treatment of Subjects With Active Psoriatic Arthritis
A Phase 3 study testing Bimekizumab in people with Psoriatic Arthritis, run by UCB Biopharma SRL at 92 sites in 11 countries.
Trial summary
This is a study to demonstrate the clinical efficacy, safety and tolerability of bimekizumab administered subcutaneously (sc) compared with placebo in the treatment of tumor necrosis factor alpha-inadequate responders (TNFα-IR) subjects with active Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Psoriatic Arthritis
- What is being tested?
- Bimekizumab
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 400 participants
- Where
- 92 sitesin 11 countries
- Study dates
- 28 Mar 2019to 14 Feb 2022
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Subject is male or female at least 18 years of age
- Female subjects must be postmenopausal, permanently sterilized or willing to use a highly effective method of contraception
- Documented diagnosis of adult-onset Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) meeting the Classification Criteria for Psoriatic Arthritis (CASPAR) for at least 6 months prior to Screening with active PsA and must have at Baseline tender joint count (TJC) >=3 out of 68 and swollen joint count (SJC) >=3 out of 66
- Subject must be negative for rheumatoid factor and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (CCP) antibodies
- Subject must have at least 1 active psoriatic lesion(s) and/or a documented history of psoriasis (PSO)
- Subject has a history of inadequate response (lack of efficacy after at least 3 months of therapy at an approved dose) or intolerance to treatment with 1 or 2 tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF(α)) inhibitors for either PsA or PSO
- Subjects currently taking NSAIDs, cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2) inhibitors, analgesics (including mild opioids), corticosteroids, methotrexate (MTX), leflunomide (LEF), sulfasalazine (SSZ), hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) AND/OR apremilast can be allowed if they fulfill specific requirements prior to study entry
Who cannot join
- Female subjects who are breastfeeding, pregnant, or plan to become pregnant during the study
- Subjects with current or prior exposure to any biologics except tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors for the treatment of PsA or PSO
- Subject has an active infection or a history of recent serious infections
- Subject has known tuberculosis (TB) infection, is at high risk of acquiring TB infection, or has current or history of nontuberculous mycobacterium (NTMB) infection
- Subject has a diagnosis of inflammatory conditions other than PSO or PsA. Subjects with a diagnosis of Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, or other inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are allowed as long as they have no active symptomatic disease at Screening or Baseline
- Subject had acute anterior uveitis within 6 weeks of Baseline
Show all 10Show fewer
- Subject has any active malignancy or history of malignancy within 5 years prior to the Screening Visit EXCEPT treated and considered cured cutaneous squamous or basal cell carcinoma, or in situ cervical cancer
- Subject has a form of PSO other than chronic plaque-type (eg, pustular, erythrodermic and guttate PSO, or drug-induced PSO)
- Presence of active suicidal ideation, or moderately severe major depression or severe major depression
- Subject has a history of chronic alcohol or drug abuse within 6 months prior to Screening
Trial locations and contacts
92 sites in 11 countries.
92 sites in 11 countries
United States33 sites
Pa0011 50029
Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87102
Pa0011 50039
Atlanta, Georgia, 30342
Pa0011 50002
Austin, Texas, 78731
Pa0011 50023
Baton Rouge, Louisiana, 70836
Pa0011 50050
Beckley, West Virginia, 25801
Pa0011 50024
Boise, Idaho, 83702
Pa0011 50047
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115-5817
Pa0011 50010
Brooklyn, New York, 11201
Pa0011 50125
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28210
Pa0011 50020
Duncansville, Pennsylvania, 16635
Pa0011 50005
Freehold, New Jersey, 07728
Pa0011 50015
Hagerstown, Maryland, 21740
Pa0011 50001
Jackson, Tennessee, 38305
Pa0011 50008
Johnston, Rhode Island, 02919
Pa0011 50019
Lansing, Michigan, 48911
Pa0011 50028
Lexington, Kentucky, 40504
Pa0011 50012
Memphis, Tennessee, 38119-5214
Pa0011 50036
Mesquite, Texas, 75150
Pa0011 50011
New York, New York, 10003
Pa0011 50033
Palm Harbor, Florida, 34684
Pa0011 50064
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104
Pa0011 50017
Phoenix, Arizona, 85037
Pa0011 50034
Rochester, New York, 14642
Pa0011 50031
Salisbury, North Carolina, 28144
Pa0011 50035
San Diego, California, 92128
Pa0011 50016
St Louis, Missouri, 63141
Pa0011 50021
Summerville, South Carolina, 29486
Pa0011 50037
Tampa, Florida, 33613
Pa0011 50004
Tustin, California, 92780
Pa0011 50040
Vandalia, Ohio, 45377
Pa0011 50009
Waco, Texas, 76710
Pa0011 50026
Wheaton, Maryland, 20902
Pa0011 50006
Wyomissing, Pennsylvania, 19610
Poland12 sites
Pa0011 40119
Bydgoszcz
Pa0011 40038
Elblag
Pa0011 40037
Lublin
Pa0011 40091
Nowa Sól
Pa0011 40044
Poznan
Pa0011 40090
Poznan
Pa0011 40118
Torun
Pa0011 40041
Warsaw
Pa0011 40097
Warsaw
Pa0011 40098
Warsaw
Pa0011 40039
Wroclaw
Pa0011 40043
Wroclaw
Japan11 sites
Pa0011 20030
Chūōku
Pa0011 20036
Kawachi-Nagano
Pa0011 20045
Kita-gun
Pa0011 20049
Kitakyushu
Pa0011 20044
Minatoku
Pa0011 20041
Osaka
Pa0011 20046
Osaka
Pa0011 20031
Sapporo
Pa0011 20042
Sasebo
Pa0011 20032
Suita
Pa0011 20043
tabashi City
Russia11 sites
Pa0011 20005
Korolyov
Pa0011 20010
Moscow
Pa0011 20013
Petrozavodsk
Pa0011 20001
Saint Petersburg
Pa0011 20004
Saint Petersburg
Pa0011 20009
Saint Petersburg
Pa0011 20007
Saratov
Pa0011 20014
Ulyanovsk
Pa0011 20006
Vladimir
Pa0011 20008
Yaroslavl
Pa0011 20015
Yaroslavl
Germany7 sites
Pa0011 40076
Cottbus
Pa0011 40023
Erlangen
Pa0011 40117
Frankfurt
Pa0011 40029
Hamburg
Pa0011 40071
Hamburg
Pa0011 40078
Leipzig
Pa0011 40026
Ratingen
Czechia4 sites
Pa0011 40009
Pardubice
Pa0011 40063
Prague
Pa0011 40066
Prague
Pa0011 40012
Zlín
Australia3 sites
Pa0011 30005
Camberwell
Pa0011 30007
Victoria Park
Pa0011 30006
Woodville South
Canada3 sites
Pa0011 50042
Rimouski
Pa0011 50043
Sydney
Pa0011 50044
Trois-Rivières
United Kingdom3 sites
Pa0011 40111
Bradford
Pa0011 40109
Oxford
Pa0011 40116
Stamford
About this study
Official title: A Multicenter, Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Bimekizumab in the Treatment of Subjects With Active Psoriatic Arthritis
This is a study to demonstrate the clinical efficacy, safety and tolerability of bimekizumab administered subcutaneously (sc) compared with placebo in the treatment of tumor necrosis factor alpha-inadequate responders (TNFα-IR) subjects with active Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA).
- Conditions
- Psoriatic Arthritis
- Being tested
- Bimekizumab, Placebo
- Keywords
- Psoriatic Arthritis, PsA, Bimekizumab
- Medical subject headings
- Arthritis, Psoriatic
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
BimekizumabDrug
Also called BKZ, UCB4940
Subjects will receive bimekizumab at pre-specified time-points.
PlaceboOther
Also called PBO
Subjects will receive placebo at pre-specified time-points.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Bimekizumab dosage regimen | Experimental | Subjects randomized to this arm will receive assigned bimekizumab dosage regimen. Receives: Drug: Bimekizumab |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Subjects randomized to this arm will receive placebo. Receives: Other: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 50 (ACR50) Response
The ACR50 response rate was based on a 50% or greater improvement of arthritis relative to Baseline. Participants who met the following 3 conditions for improvement from Baseline were classified as meeting the ACR50 response criteria: 1.≥ 50% improvement in 68-tender joint count; 2.≥ 50% improvement in 66-swollen joint count; and 3.≥ 50% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: Physician global assessment of disease activity [100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) (0=no symptoms;100=severe symptoms)], Patient global assessment of disease activity [100 mm VAS (0=no limitation of normal activities;100=very poor], Patient assessment of pain [100 mm VAS (0=no pain;100=most severe pain)], Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) assessed degree of difficulty experienced in 8 domains of daily living activities (20 questions), its score (0-3) computed from item scores, lower scores indicated less disability and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP).
Measured: From Baseline to Week 16
Secondary outcomes (14)
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Total Score at Week 16
The HAQ-DI contains 20 items that measured the degree of difficulty experienced in the following 8 categories of the daily living activities: dressing and grooming (2 items), arising (2 items), eating (3 items), walking (2 items), hygiene (3 items), reach (2 items), grip (3 items), and common daily activities (3 items). Each question was scored 0-3 (0 = without any difficulty, 1 = with some difficulty, 2 = with much difficulty, and 3 = unable to do). The overall HAQ-DI total score was calculated by dividing the sum of the highest category scores (0 to 24) by the number of categories with at least 1 question answered. The HAQ-DI score ranges from 0 (no difficulty) to 3 (maximum difficulty). A lower HAQ-DI score indicated an improvement in function. Change from baseline was computed as the value at Week 16 minus the baseline value. A negative value in change from baseline indicated an improvement.
Measured: Baseline and Week 16
Psoriasis Area Severity Index 90 Response (PASI90) at Week 4 in the Subgroup of Participants With Psoriasis (PSO) Involving at Least 3% Body Surface Area (BSA) at Baseline
The PASI90 response assessments are based on at least 90% improvement in PASI score from Baseline. Body divided into 4 areas: head, arms, trunk to groin, and legs to top of buttocks. Assignment of an average score for redness, thickness, and scaling for each of the 4 body areas with a score of 0 (clear) to 4 (very marked). Determining the percentage of skin covered with PSO for each of the body areas and converting to a 0 to 6 scale. Final PASI= average redness, thickness, and scaliness of the psoriatic skin lesions, multiplied by the involved psoriasis area score of respective section, and weighted by the percentage of the person's affected skin for respective section. The minimum possible PASI score is 0= no disease, the maximum score is 72= maximal disease.
Measured: From Baseline to Week 4
Psoriasis Area Severity Index 90 (PASI90) Response at Week 16 in the Subgroup of Participants With Psoriasis (PSO) Involving at Least 3% Body Surface Area at Baseline
The PASI90 response assessments are based on at least 90% improvement in PASI score from Baseline. Body divided into 4 areas: head, arms, trunk to groin, and legs to top of buttocks. Assignment of an average score for redness, thickness, and scaling for each of the 4 body areas with a score of 0 (clear) to 4 (very marked). Determining the percentage of skin covered with PSO for each of the body areas and converting to a 0 to 6 scale. Final PASI= average redness, thickness, and scaliness of the psoriatic skin lesions, multiplied by the involved psoriasis area score of respective section, and weighted by the percentage of the person's affected skin for respective section. The minimum possible PASI score is 0= no disease, the maximum score is 72= maximal disease.
Measured: From Baseline to Week 16
Change From Baseline in the Short Form 36-item Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score at Week 16
The SF-36 (version 2, standard recall) is a 36-item generic HRQoL instrument that uses a recall period of 4 weeks. The questionnaire has 36 questions composing the scale that represent 8 domains: 1) physical functioning, 2) role physical, 3) bodily pain, 4) general health, 5) vitality, 6) social functioning, 7) role emotional, and 8) mental health. The scores for the 8 domains were combined into two summary scores: the physical component summary (PCS) score and the mental component summary (MCS) score. Domains 1 to 4 primarily contribute to the PCS score of the SF-36. Domains 5-8 primarily contribute to the MCS score of the SF-36. Each of the 8 domain scores and the component summary score range from 0=worst to 100=best. Higher scores represent better health status. A positive change in value indicated improvement from baseline.
Measured: Baseline and Week 16
Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) at Week 16
MDA is a measure to indicate disease remission, and is based on a composite score of 7 domains. A participant is considered as having achieved the MDA if the participant fulfills at least 5 of the following 7 criteria: Tender joint count (0-68 joints) <=1; Swollen joint count (0-66 joints) <=1; PASI <=1 for participants with psoriasis covering BSA <=3% [PASI evaluates the severity and extent of psoriasis. In PASI, body is divided into four parts, head and neck, upper limb, trunk and lower limbs. Each area is assessed for erythema, induration and scaling, each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The total score ranges from 0 (no disease) to 72 (maximal disease)]; Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain <=15 [using VAS on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 100 (serious pain)]; Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity <=20 [using VAS on a scale of 0 (very well) to 100 (very poor)]; HAQ-DI score <=0.5; Leeds Enthesitis Index score <=1 for participants with enthesitis at baseline.
Measured: Week 16
Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 20 (ACR20) Response
The ACR20 response rate was based on a 20% or greater improvement of arthritis relative to Baseline. Participants who met the following 3 conditions for improvement from Baseline were classified as meeting the ACR20 response criteria: 1.≥ 20% improvement in 68-tender joint count; 2.≥ 20% improvement in 66-swollen joint count; and 3.≥ 20% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: Physician global assessment of disease activity [100 mm VAS (0=no symptoms;100=severe symptoms)], Patient global assessment of disease activity [100 mm VAS (0=no limitation of normal activities;100=very poor], Patient assessment of pain [100 mm VAS (0=no pain;100=most severe pain)], HAQ-DI assessed degree of difficulty experienced in 8 domains of daily living activities (20 questions), its score (0-3) computed from item scores, lower scores indicated less disability, hsCRP.
Measured: From Baseline to Week 16
Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 70 (ACR70) Response
The ACR70 response rate was based on a 70% or greater improvement of arthritis relative to Baseline. Participants who met the following 3 conditions for improvement from Baseline were classified as meeting the ACR20 response criteria: 1.≥ 70% improvement in 68-tender joint count; 2.≥ 70% improvement in 66-swollen joint count; and 3.≥ 70% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: Physician global assessment of disease activity [100 mm VAS (0=no symptoms;100=severe symptoms)], Patient global assessment of disease activity [100 mm VAS (0=no limitation of normal activities;100=very poor], Patient assessment of pain [100 mm VAS (0=no pain;100=most severe pain)], HAQ-DI assessed degree of difficulty experienced in 8 domains of daily living activities (20 questions), its score (0-3) computed from item scores, lower scores indicated less disability, hsCRP.
Measured: From Baseline to Week 16
Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) Response Defined as Score of 0 (Clear) or 1 (Almost Clear) and at Least a 2-grade Reduction From Baseline at Week 4 in the Subset of Participants With Psoriatic Skin Lesions at Baseline
IGA measured the overall severity of PSO using the following 5-point scale and score was rated as 0=clear (No signs of PSO; post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation may be present), 1=almost clear (No thickening; normal to pink coloration; no to minimal focal scaling), 2=mild (Just detectable to mild thickening; pink to light red coloration; predominately fine scaling), 3=moderate (Clearly distinguishable to moderate thickening; dull to bright red, moderate scaling), and 4=severe (Severe thickening with hard edges; bright to deep dark red coloration; severe/coarse scaling covering almost all or all lesions). The IGA response is defined as score of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear) with at least a 2-category improvement relative to Baseline.
Measured: Baseline and Week 4
Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) Response Defined as Score of 0 (Clear) or 1 (Almost Clear) and at Least a 2-grade Reduction From Baseline at Week 16 in the Subset of Participants With Psoriatic Skin Lesions at Baseline
IGA measured the overall severity of PSO using the following 5-point scale and score was rated as 0=clear (No signs of PSO; post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation may be present), 1=almost clear (No thickening; normal to pink coloration; no to minimal focal scaling), 2=mild (Just detectable to mild thickening; pink to light red coloration; predominately fine scaling), 3=moderate (Clearly distinguishable to moderate thickening; dull to bright red, moderate scaling), and 4=severe (Severe thickening with hard edges; bright to deep dark red coloration; severe/coarse scaling covering almost all or all lesions). The IGA response is defined as score of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear) with at least a 2-category improvement relative to Baseline.
Measured: Baseline and Week 16
Change From Baseline in the Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain (PtAAP) at Week 16
The PtAAP Visual Analog Scale (VAS) is part of the American College of Rheumatology core set of measures in arthritis. Participants assessed their arthritis pain using a VAS on a scale of 0 (very well) to 100 (very poor). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Measured: Baseline and Week 16
Change From Baseline in Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease-12 (PsAID-12) Total Score at Week 16
The PsAID-12 is a patient-reported outcome measure for assessing the impact of Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) in 12 physical and psychological domains, including pain, fatigue, skin problems, work and/or leisure activities, functional capacity, discomfort, sleep disturbance, coping, anxiety/fear/uncertainty, embarrassment and/or shame, social participation, and depression. Each domain is assessed with a single question using a 0 to 10 numerical rating scale. Each domain score was multiplied by a weighting factor and the results were then summed to provide the total score. The total score ranged from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating a worse status. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Measured: Baseline and Week 16
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During the Study
An Adverse Event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation subject administered a pharmaceutical product, which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE could therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product, whether or not related to the medicinal (investigational) product. TEAEs were defined as any AEs with an onset date on or after the date of first IMP administration and up to 20 weeks after the last (most recent) dose of IMP.
Measured: From Baseline until Safety Follow-Up (up to 37 weeks)
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the Study
A serious adverse event (SAE) is any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: Results in death, Is life-threatening, Requires in patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; Is a congenital anomaly or birth defect; Is an infection that requires treatment parenteral antibiotics, Other important medical events which based on medical or scientific judgement may jeopardize the patients, or may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent any of the above. TEAEs were defined as any AEs with an onset date on or after the date of first IMP administration and up to 20 weeks after the last (most recent) dose of IMP.
Measured: From Baseline until Safety Follow-Up (up to 37 weeks)
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Leading to Withdrawal From Investigational Medicinal Product (IMP) During the Study
An Adverse Event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation subject administered a pharmaceutical product, which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE could therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product, whether or not related to the medicinal (investigational) product. TEAEs were defined as any AEs with an onset date on or after the date of first IMP administration and up to 20 weeks after the last (most recent) dose of IMP.
Measured: From Baseline until Safety Follow-Up (up to 37 weeks)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 Apr 2019
- Study start28 Mar 2019
- Primary completion8 Dec 2021
- Study completion14 Feb 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (19)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Psoriatic ArthritisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by UCB Biopharma SRLThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 400 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- UCB Biopharma SRL
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- UCB Cares, Study director, 001 844 599 2273 (UCB)
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03896581
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PA0011
- Other IDs
- 2017-002804-29, 2017
- Acronym
- BE COMPLETE
- Status last verified
- Aug 2026
- First submitted
- 21 Mar 2019
- Last updated
- 25 Sep 2026
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Data from this trial may be requested by qualified researchers six months after product approval in the US and/or Europe, or global development is discontinued, and 18 months after trial completion. Investigators may request access to anonymized individual patient-level data and redacted trial documents which may include: analysis-ready datasets, study protocol, annotated case report form, statistical analysis plan, dataset specifications, and clinical study report. Prior to use of the data, proposals need to be approved by an independent review panel at www.Vivli.org and a signed data sharing agreement will need to be executed. All documents are available in English only, for a pre-specified time, typically 12 months, on a password protected portal. This plan may change if the risk of re-identifying trial participants is determined to be too high after the trial is completed; in this case and to protect participants, individual patient-level data would not be made available.
Publications
Mease PJ, Warren RB, Nash P, Grouin JM, Lyris N, Willems D, Taieb V, Eells J, McInnes IB. Comparative Effectiveness of Bimekizumab and Secukinumab in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis at 52 Weeks Using a Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison. Rheumatol Ther. 2024 Jun;11(3):817-828. doi: 10.1007/s40744-024-00652-7. Epub 2024 Mar 6.
PubMed 38446397Warren RB, McInnes IB, Nash P, Grouin JM, Lyris N, Willems D, Taieb V, Eells J, Mease PJ. Comparative Effectiveness of Bimekizumab and Guselkumab in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis at 52 Weeks Assessed Using a Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison. Rheumatol Ther. 2024 Jun;11(3):829-839. doi: 10.1007/s40744-024-00659-0. Epub 2024 Mar 15.
PubMed 38488975Mease PJ, Warren RB, Nash P, Grouin JM, Lyris N, Willems D, Taieb V, Eells J, McInnes IB. Comparative Effectiveness of Bimekizumab and Risankizumab in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis at 52 Weeks Assessed Using a Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison. Rheumatol Ther. 2024 Oct;11(5):1403-1412. doi: 10.1007/s40744-024-00706-w. Epub 2024 Aug 9.
PubMed 39120849Kristensen LE, Tillett W, Nash P, Coates LC, Mease PJ, Ogdie A, Gisondi P, Ink B, Prickett AR, Bajracharya R, Taieb V, Lyris N, Lambert J, Walsh JA. Association of achieving clinical disease control criteria and patient-reported outcomes in bimekizumab-treated patients with active psoriatic arthritis: results from two phase III studies. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2024 Nov 11;16:1759720X241288071. doi: 10.1177/1759720X241288071. eCollection 2024.
PubMed 39534481Mease PJ, Merola JF, Tanaka Y, Gossec L, McInnes IB, Ritchlin CT, Landewe RBM, Asahina A, Ink B, Heinrichs A, Bajracharya R, Shende V, Coarse J, Coates LC. Summary of Research: Safety and Efficacy of Bimekizumab in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis: 2-Year Results from Two Phase 3 Studies. Rheumatol Ther. 2025 Aug;12(4):609-612. doi: 10.1007/s40744-025-00764-8. Epub 2025 May 10.
PubMed 40347389Thaci D, Asahina A, Boehncke WH, Gottlieb AB, Lebwohl M, Warren RB, Edens H, Ink B, Bajracharya R, Coarse J, Merola JF. Bimekizumab Efficacy and Safety in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis with Substantial Skin and Nail Psoriasis to 1 Year. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2026 Feb;16(2):953-976. doi: 10.1007/s13555-025-01599-5. Epub 2025 Dec 12.
PubMed 41381988Gossec L, Coates LC, Landewe RBM, Mease PJ, Merola JF, Ritchlin CT, Tanaka Y, Asahina A, Proft F, Goldammer N, Manente M, Ink B, Bajracharya R, Coarse J, McInnes IB. Bimekizumab safety and efficacy in patients with psoriatic arthritis: 3-year results from two phase 3 studies. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2026 May 5;65(5):keag118. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keag118.
PubMed 41838419Gossec L, Tillett W, Coates LC, Mease PJ, de Wit M, Gladman DD, Orbai AM, Proft F, Ink B, Bajracharya R, Lambert J, Healy P, Husni ME. Control of Inflammation and Sustained Improvements in Patient-Reported Outcomes in Patients With Psoriatic Arthritis: Bimekizumab Two-Year Results From Two Phase 3 Studies. ACR Open Rheumatol. 2026 May;8(5):e90053. doi: 10.1002/acr2.90053.
PubMed 42152504Nikiphorou E, Tillett W, Deodhar A, Dubreuil M, Gossec L, Hwang M, Lubrano E, Machado PM, Rudwaleit M, de Wit M, Kavanagh S, de la Loge C, Ink B, Lambert J, Morup M, Boonen A, Walsh J. Effect of Bimekizumab Treatment on Health Status, Work Productivity, and Productivity Costs Through 3 Years in Axial Spondyloarthritis and Psoriatic Arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2026 Aug 1:jrheum.2026-0104. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.2026-0104. Online ahead of print.
PubMed 42386286Deodhar A, Gottlieb AB, Merola JF, Soriano ER, Coates LC, Ink B, Bajracharya R, Healy P, Mease PJ. Bimekizumab efficacy across GRAPPA domains to 3 years in patients with psoriatic arthritis: a post hoc analysis of two phase 3 studies. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2026 Oct 10:keag557. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keag557. Online ahead of print.
PubMed 42860055Mease PJ, Merola JF, Magrey M, Nash P, Poddubnyy D, Lebwohl M, Bajracharya R, Ink B, Marten A, Manente M, Peterson L, White K, Gensler LS. Bimekizumab longer-term safety profile in adult patients with axial spondyloarthritis or psoriatic arthritis: an updated analysis of six phase IIb/III clinical studies. RMD Open. 2026 Mar 10;12(1):e006174. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2025-006174.
PubMed 41807031Mease PJ, Gensler LS, Orbai AM, Warren RB, Bajracharya R, Ink B, Marten A, Massow U, Shende V, Manente M, Peterson L, White K, Landewe R, Poddubnyy D. Long-term safety of bimekizumab in adult patients with axial spondyloarthritis or psoriatic arthritis: pooled results from integrated phase IIb/III clinical studies. RMD Open. 2025 Apr 6;11(2):e005026. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2024-005026.
PubMed 40194794Gladman DD, Mease PJ, Gossec L, Husni ME, Gottlieb AB, Ink B, Bajracharya R, Coarse J, Lyris N, Lambert J, Tillett W. Effect of Bimekizumab on Patient-Reported Outcomes and Work Productivity in Patients With Psoriatic Arthritis: 1-Year Results From 2 Phase III Studies. J Rheumatol. 2025 May 1;52(5):466-478. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.2024-0923.
PubMed 39892885Husni ME, Mease PJ, Merola JF, Tillett W, Goldammer N, Ink B, Coarse J, Lambert J, Taieb V, Gladman DD. Bimekizumab provided rapid improvements in patient-reported symptoms and health-related quality of life in patients with active psoriatic arthritis: pooled 16-week results from two phase 3 studies. RMD Open. 2024 Sep 23;10(3):e004464. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2024-004464.
PubMed 39313302Mease PJ, Merola JF, Tanaka Y, Gossec L, McInnes IB, Ritchlin CT, Landewe RBM, Asahina A, Ink B, Heinrichs A, Bajracharya R, Shende V, Coarse J, Coates LC. Safety and Efficacy of Bimekizumab in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis: 2-Year Results from Two Phase 3 Studies. Rheumatol Ther. 2024 Oct;11(5):1363-1382. doi: 10.1007/s40744-024-00708-8. Epub 2024 Aug 31.
PubMed 39215949
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 25 Sep 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Multicenter, Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Bimekizumab in the Treatment of Subjects With Active Psoriatic Arthritis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03896581
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- BE COMPLETE / PA0011
- Conditions
- Psoriatic Arthritis
- Keywords
- Psoriatic Arthritis, PsA, Bimekizumab
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 400 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- UCB Biopharma SRLIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 28 Mar 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 8 Dec 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 14 Feb 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 1 Apr 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 16 Oct 2024
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a study to demonstrate the clinical efficacy, safety and tolerability of bimekizumab administered subcutaneously (sc) compared with placebo in the treatment of tumor necrosis factor alpha-inadequate responders (TNFα-IR) subjects with active Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Bimekizumab dosage regimen | Experimental | Drug: BimekizumabSubjects randomized to this arm will receive assigned bimekizumab dosage regimen. |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Other: PlaceboSubjects randomized to this arm will receive placebo. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Subject is male or female at least 18 years of age
- Female subjects must be postmenopausal, permanently sterilized or willing to use a highly effective method of contraception
- Documented diagnosis of adult-onset Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) meeting the Classification Criteria for Psoriatic Arthritis (CASPAR) for at least 6 months prior to Screening with active PsA and must have at Baseline tender joint count (TJC) >=3 out of 68 and swollen joint count (SJC) >=3 out of 66
- Subject must be negative for rheumatoid factor and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (CCP) antibodies
- Subject must have at least 1 active psoriatic lesion(s) and/or a documented history of psoriasis (PSO)
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Female subjects who are breastfeeding, pregnant, or plan to become pregnant during the study
- Subjects with current or prior exposure to any biologics except tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors for the treatment of PsA or PSO
- Subject has an active infection or a history of recent serious infections
- Subject has known tuberculosis (TB) infection, is at high risk of acquiring TB infection, or has current or history of nontuberculous mycobacterium (NTMB) infection
- Subject has a diagnosis of inflammatory conditions other than PSO or PsA. Subjects with a diagnosis of Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, or other inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are allowed as long as they have no active symptomatic disease at Screening or Baseline
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| BimekizumabAlso: BKZ, UCB4940Subjects will receive bimekizumab at pre-specified time-points. | Drug | Bimekizumab dosage regimen |
| PlaceboAlso: PBOSubjects will receive placebo at pre-specified time-points. | Other | Placebo |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 50 (ACR50) Response
Time frame: From Baseline to Week 16
The ACR50 response rate was based on a 50% or greater improvement of arthritis relative to Baseline. Participants who met the following 3 conditions for improvement from Baseline were classified as meeting the ACR50 response criteria: 1.≥ 50% improvement in 68-tender joint count; 2.≥ 50% improvement in 66-swollen joint count; and 3.≥ 50% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: Physician global assessment of disease activity [100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) (0=no symptoms;100=severe symptoms)], Patient global assessment of disease activity [100 mm VAS (0=no limitation of normal activities;100=very poor], Patient assessment of pain [100 mm VAS (0=no pain;100=most severe pain)], Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) assessed degree of difficulty experienced in 8 domains of daily living activities (20 questions), its score (0-3) computed from item scores, lower scores indicated less disability and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP).
14 secondary outcomes
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Total Score at Week 16
Time frame: Baseline and Week 16
Psoriasis Area Severity Index 90 Response (PASI90) at Week 4 in the Subgroup of Participants With Psoriasis (PSO) Involving at Least 3% Body Surface Area (BSA) at Baseline
Time frame: From Baseline to Week 4
Psoriasis Area Severity Index 90 (PASI90) Response at Week 16 in the Subgroup of Participants With Psoriasis (PSO) Involving at Least 3% Body Surface Area at Baseline
Time frame: From Baseline to Week 16
Change From Baseline in the Short Form 36-item Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score at Week 16
Time frame: Baseline and Week 16
Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) at Week 16
Time frame: Week 16
Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 20 (ACR20) Response
Time frame: From Baseline to Week 16
Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 70 (ACR70) Response
Time frame: From Baseline to Week 16
Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) Response Defined as Score of 0 (Clear) or 1 (Almost Clear) and at Least a 2-grade Reduction From Baseline at Week 4 in the Subset of Participants With Psoriatic Skin Lesions at Baseline
Time frame: Baseline and Week 4
Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) Response Defined as Score of 0 (Clear) or 1 (Almost Clear) and at Least a 2-grade Reduction From Baseline at Week 16 in the Subset of Participants With Psoriatic Skin Lesions at Baseline
Time frame: Baseline and Week 16
Change From Baseline in the Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain (PtAAP) at Week 16
Time frame: Baseline and Week 16
Change From Baseline in Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease-12 (PsAID-12) Total Score at Week 16
Time frame: Baseline and Week 16
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During the Study
Time frame: From Baseline until Safety Follow-Up (up to 37 weeks)
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the Study
Time frame: From Baseline until Safety Follow-Up (up to 37 weeks)
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Leading to Withdrawal From Investigational Medicinal Product (IMP) During the Study
Time frame: From Baseline until Safety Follow-Up (up to 37 weeks)
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 25 Sep 2026.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Results publication: PubMed 38446397Mease PJ, Warren RB, Nash P, Grouin JM, Lyris N, Willems D, Taieb V, Eells J, McInnes IB. Comparative Effectiveness of Bimekizumab and Secukinumab in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis at 52 Weeks Using a Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison. Rheumatol Ther. 2024 Jun;11(3):817-828. doi: 10.1007/s40744-024-00652-7. Epub 2024 Mar 6.
- Results publication: PubMed 38488975Warren RB, McInnes IB, Nash P, Grouin JM, Lyris N, Willems D, Taieb V, Eells J, Mease PJ. Comparative Effectiveness of Bimekizumab and Guselkumab in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis at 52 Weeks Assessed Using a Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison. Rheumatol Ther. 2024 Jun;11(3):829-839. doi: 10.1007/s40744-024-00659-0. Epub 2024 Mar 15.
- Results publication: PubMed 39120849Mease PJ, Warren RB, Nash P, Grouin JM, Lyris N, Willems D, Taieb V, Eells J, McInnes IB. Comparative Effectiveness of Bimekizumab and Risankizumab in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis at 52 Weeks Assessed Using a Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison. Rheumatol Ther. 2024 Oct;11(5):1403-1412. doi: 10.1007/s40744-024-00706-w. Epub 2024 Aug 9.
- Results publication: PubMed 39534481Kristensen LE, Tillett W, Nash P, Coates LC, Mease PJ, Ogdie A, Gisondi P, Ink B, Prickett AR, Bajracharya R, Taieb V, Lyris N, Lambert J, Walsh JA. Association of achieving clinical disease control criteria and patient-reported outcomes in bimekizumab-treated patients with active psoriatic arthritis: results from two phase III studies. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2024 Nov 11;16:1759720X241288071. doi: 10.1177/1759720X241288071. eCollection 2024.
- Results publication: PubMed 40347389Mease PJ, Merola JF, Tanaka Y, Gossec L, McInnes IB, Ritchlin CT, Landewe RBM, Asahina A, Ink B, Heinrichs A, Bajracharya R, Shende V, Coarse J, Coates LC. Summary of Research: Safety and Efficacy of Bimekizumab in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis: 2-Year Results from Two Phase 3 Studies. Rheumatol Ther. 2025 Aug;12(4):609-612. doi: 10.1007/s40744-025-00764-8. Epub 2025 May 10.
- Results publication: PubMed 41381988Thaci D, Asahina A, Boehncke WH, Gottlieb AB, Lebwohl M, Warren RB, Edens H, Ink B, Bajracharya R, Coarse J, Merola JF. Bimekizumab Efficacy and Safety in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis with Substantial Skin and Nail Psoriasis to 1 Year. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2026 Feb;16(2):953-976. doi: 10.1007/s13555-025-01599-5. Epub 2025 Dec 12.
- Results publication: PubMed 41838419Gossec L, Coates LC, Landewe RBM, Mease PJ, Merola JF, Ritchlin CT, Tanaka Y, Asahina A, Proft F, Goldammer N, Manente M, Ink B, Bajracharya R, Coarse J, McInnes IB. Bimekizumab safety and efficacy in patients with psoriatic arthritis: 3-year results from two phase 3 studies. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2026 May 5;65(5):keag118. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keag118.
- Results publication: PubMed 42152504Gossec L, Tillett W, Coates LC, Mease PJ, de Wit M, Gladman DD, Orbai AM, Proft F, Ink B, Bajracharya R, Lambert J, Healy P, Husni ME. Control of Inflammation and Sustained Improvements in Patient-Reported Outcomes in Patients With Psoriatic Arthritis: Bimekizumab Two-Year Results From Two Phase 3 Studies. ACR Open Rheumatol. 2026 May;8(5):e90053. doi: 10.1002/acr2.90053.
- Results publication: PubMed 42386286Nikiphorou E, Tillett W, Deodhar A, Dubreuil M, Gossec L, Hwang M, Lubrano E, Machado PM, Rudwaleit M, de Wit M, Kavanagh S, de la Loge C, Ink B, Lambert J, Morup M, Boonen A, Walsh J. Effect of Bimekizumab Treatment on Health Status, Work Productivity, and Productivity Costs Through 3 Years in Axial Spondyloarthritis and Psoriatic Arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2026 Aug 1:jrheum.2026-0104. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.2026-0104. Online ahead of print.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 42860055Deodhar A, Gottlieb AB, Merola JF, Soriano ER, Coates LC, Ink B, Bajracharya R, Healy P, Mease PJ. Bimekizumab efficacy across GRAPPA domains to 3 years in patients with psoriatic arthritis: a post hoc analysis of two phase 3 studies. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2026 Oct 10:keag557. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keag557. Online ahead of print.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41807031Mease PJ, Merola JF, Magrey M, Nash P, Poddubnyy D, Lebwohl M, Bajracharya R, Ink B, Marten A, Manente M, Peterson L, White K, Gensler LS. Bimekizumab longer-term safety profile in adult patients with axial spondyloarthritis or psoriatic arthritis: an updated analysis of six phase IIb/III clinical studies. RMD Open. 2026 Mar 10;12(1):e006174. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2025-006174.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40194794Mease PJ, Gensler LS, Orbai AM, Warren RB, Bajracharya R, Ink B, Marten A, Massow U, Shende V, Manente M, Peterson L, White K, Landewe R, Poddubnyy D. Long-term safety of bimekizumab in adult patients with axial spondyloarthritis or psoriatic arthritis: pooled results from integrated phase IIb/III clinical studies. RMD Open. 2025 Apr 6;11(2):e005026. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2024-005026.
- Product InformationLink provided by the sponsor.
- FDA Safety Alerts and RecallsLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Data from this trial may be requested by qualified researchers six months after product approval in the US and/or Europe, or global development is discontinued, and 18 months after trial completion. Investigators may request access to anonymized individual patient-level data and redacted trial documents which may include: analysis-ready datasets, study protocol, annotated case report form, statistical analysis plan, dataset specifications, and clinical study report. Prior to use of the data, proposals need to be approved by an independent review panel at www.Vivli.org and a signed data sharing agreement will need to be executed. All documents are available in English only, for a pre-specified time, typically 12 months, on a password protected portal. This plan may change if the risk of re-identifying trial participants is determined to be too high after the trial is completed; in this case and to protect participants, individual patient-level data would not be made available.
Related trials for Psoriatic Arthritis
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Extension Study of Safety and Tolerability of DDY391 in Participants With Moderate to Severe Psoriatic Arthritis (CDDY391A12201-extension)
Moderate to Severe Psoriatic Arthritis
Recruiting
Efficacy of a Self-Management Smartphone App to Improve Safety Skills in Patients With Inflammatory Arthritis
Rhumatoid Arthisis, Spondyloarthritis (SA)
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study to Learn if Bimekizumab Given in Different Ways is Safe and Moves Similarly Throughout the Body Over Time in Adults
Psoriatic Arthritis, Axial Spondyloarthritis
RecruitingPhase 4
Impact of Glucagon-like Peptide-1 (GLP-1) Analogs on Disease Outcomes in Psoriatic Arthritis: A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial
Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
Guselkumab vs Golimumab in PsA TNF Inadequate Responder Patients
Psoriatic Arthritis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
UCB Cares study director
001 844 599 2273 (UCB)
92 sites in 11 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Bimekizumab in people with Psoriatic Arthritis, run by UCB Biopharma SRL at 92 sites in 11 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 92 sites in United States, Poland, Japan, Russia, Germany and 6 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 16 Oct 2024). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 50 (ACR50) Response (time frame: From Baseline to Week 16). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03896581, which also lists 19 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Sep 2026.