Neonatal SEPSISNCT03896893
Neonatal Bacterial Colonization Study
A study testing Skin antisepsis and Emollient in people with Neonatal SEPSIS and Prematurity, run by University of Stellenbosch at 1 site in South Africa.
Trial summary
This study will evaluate the effect of skin antisepsis and/or emollient therapy on bacterial colonization dynamics in very low birth weight, hospitalized infants. Bacterial swabs from 5 body sites will be collected at baseline, day 3, day 8 and day 13 following study arm assignment. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages Up to 3 days
- Conditions the study is for
- Neonatal SEPSIS, Prematurity, Very Low Birth Weight Baby
- What is being tested?
- Skin antisepsis and Emollient
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 80 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSouth Africa
- Study dates
- 4 Mar 2019to 30 Sep 2019
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Up to 3 days
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Birth weight ≥1000g and ≤ 1500g (equivalent to gestational age 28 - 32 weeks)
- Day 1 or 2 or 3 of life
- Anticipated length of hospital stay > 7 days.
Who cannot join
- Birth weight <1000g or >1500g
- Mother not present, unable or unwilling to provide consent for enrolment
- Any skin condition or congenital defect that could potentially result in enhanced CHG absorption (skin blistering/bullae, congenital anomalies e.g. gastroschisis, spina bifida)
- Anticipated length of hospital stay < 7 days.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
South Africa1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Tygerberg Hospital
Cape Town, Western Cape, 7503
Angela Dramowski, MD, PhD, +27219389506, dramowski@sun.ac.za
dramowski@sun.ac.za
About this study
Official title: Impact of 1% Chlorhexidine Gluconate and/or Emollient on Neonatal Bacterial Colonization Dynamics
This study will evaluate the effect of skin antisepsis and/or emollient therapy on bacterial colonization dynamics in very low birth weight, hospitalized infants. Bacterial swabs from 5 body sites will be collected at baseline, day 3, day 8 and day 13 following study arm assignment. Study outcomes include changes in bacterial colony counts, burden of gram-negative and gram-positive pathogens and overall skin score.
Read the detailed description
Despite substantial global decline in childhood mortality rates, equivalent progress in neonatal mortality reduction has not been achieved. Severe bacterial infection affects approximately 6.9 million neonates and causes an estimated 750 000 deaths in low-middle income countries (LMIC) annually. The neonatal period extends from birth to 28 days of life, although neonatal hospitalization episodes (and therefore infection risk) are often substantially prolonged in preterm infants. In South Africa, infections account for 13.8% of neonatal mortality (following prematurity and intrapartum hypoxia). The South African Perinatal Problem Identification Programme (PPIP) cites nosocomial infection as the second most prevalent avoidable factor in neonatal deaths. Developing new approaches to prevent infection in hospitalized and preterm newborns in LMIC is key to achieving the Sustainable Development targets for under-five child survival.
The risk for hospital-onset sepsis in African neonates is disproportionately high and influenced by many factors including: high rates of prematurity and low birth weight; increasing in-hospital births, understaffing of maternity and neonatal services and limited implementation of infection prevention practices. Of infections among hospitalized neonates in high-income settings, hospital-acquired bloodstream infections (HA-BSI) predominate, accounting for 57% of infections. Research addressing the problem of hospital-onset neonatal infection should therefore focus on BSI prevention. A key target for sepsis reduction is prevention of intrapartum and post-delivery acquisition of bacterial colonization. Although the pathogenesis of bacterial colonization preceding invasive infection is well-accepted, there is limited data describing neonatal bacterial colonization dynamics in low-resource settings. Full characterization of timing, source and route of bacterial acquisition, flora/pathogen distribution, balance and changes over time is needed to identify all potential targets for neonatal BSI prevention.
Emollient therapy and reduction of pathogen colonization through skin antisepsis, are potentially useful targets for reducing risk of hospital-acquired BSI in neonates. Emollients (oils, creams and ointments) have been applied daily or bi-daily in neonatal research and routine practice settings, to promote skin integrity in preterm infants <37 weeks' gestation. The postulated mechanism of effect is improved skin barrier function and promotion of normal flora colonization, which may prevent pathogen ingress and subsequent invasive infection. A 2016 Cochrane review of emollient therapy for sepsis prevention in preterm infants found no evidence of reduced mortality or bloodstream infection rates, but the authors concluded that further studies in low-resource settings were warranted.
Chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) is a bisbiguanide molecule with broad-spectrum antiseptic activity producing membrane disruption through increased cell permeability and bacterial lysis. Efficacy and safety of daily CHG bathing to prevent pediatric bacteremia was established in a multicenter, cluster-randomized trial for infants >2 months in intensive care (ICU) using 2% CHG-impregnated cloths. Three high-quality studies of newborn CHG skin or cord cleansing showed reduced neonatal mortality and omphalitis in community-based neonates. Safety of topical CHG application for neonates has been established at concentrations ≤1%, although there is little data available on its use in premature, hospitalized neonates.
CHG skin cleansing and emollient therapy are potentially useful interventions for prevention of hospital-acquired BSI in neonates from low-resource settings. In addition, these interventions are suitable for inclusion in a neonatal sepsis prevention care bundle, should they be found to be effective, safe and feasible. In addition these interventions would be low-cost, easily scalable and potentially, a maternally-administered intervention. This study will evaluate the effect of skin antisepsis and/or emollient therapy on bacterial colonization dynamics in very low birth weight, hospitalized infants. Bacterial swabs from 5 body sites will be collected at baseline, day 3, day 8 and day 13 following study arm assignment. Study outcomes include changes in bacterial colony counts, burden of gram-negative and gram-positive pathogens and overall skin score.
- Being tested
- Skin antisepsis, Emollient
- Medical subject headings
- Neonatal Sepsis, Premature Birth, Sepsis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Skin antisepsisOther
1% aqueous chlorhexidine gluconate
EmollientOther
Aquaphor skin cream
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Standard of Care | No intervention | Routine bathing and skin care as per hospital practice |
| 1% chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) | Experimental | 1% aqueous CHG applied from the neck down with cotton swabs daily on weekdays (total of 8 days CHG application) Receives: Other: Skin antisepsis |
| Emollient therapy | Experimental | Aquaphor skin cream applied from the neck down daily on weekdays (total of 8 days emollient application) Receives: Other: Emollient |
| 1% CHG plus emollient therapy | Experimental | 1% aqueous CHG applied from the neck down with cotton swabs daily on weekdays followed immediately by Aquaphor skin cream (total of 8 days CHG application plus emollient application) Receives: Other: Skin antisepsis; Other: Emollient |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in median bacterial colony counts by body site over time
Measured: baseline, day 3, day 8 and day 13 post enrolment
Change in Gram negative pathogen burden by body site over time
Measured: baseline, day 3, day 8 and day 13 post enrolment
Change in Gram positive pathogen burden by body site over time
Measured: baseline, day 3, day 8 and day 13 post enrolment
Change in median skin condition score over time (Grading scale adapted by Darmstadt from Lane at al)
Darmstadt skin score uses a 9-point scale (calculated as the sum of points for each of 3 items: skin eythema, dryness and breakdown, with a minimum score of 1 and maximum score of 3, representing worst possible skin condition for each sub-scale, total sum of points is a minimum score of 3 and maximum score of 9 for worst possible skin condition)
Measured: Daily from enrolment to day 13 post enrolment
Secondary outcomes (2)
Incidence of laboratory-confirmed sepsis
pathogen identified on sterile site specimen (blood, urine, cerebrospinal fluid)
Measured: up until day 28 of life
Incidence of clinically-suspected sepsis
culture-negative episode of infection with at least 5 days broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy
Measured: up until day 28 of life
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 Apr 2019
- Study start4 Mar 2019
- Primary completion30 Sep 2019 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Sep 2019 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Neonatal SEPSISStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Sequential
- Model description
- Enrolled babies will be sequentially recruited to one of 4 study arms (see below).
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 80 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Stellenbosch
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Fogarty International Center of the National Institute of Health
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Angela Dramowski, University of Stellenbosch
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03896893
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- N18/07/068
- Other IDs
- 5K43TW010682
- Status last verified
- Mar 2019
- First submitted
- 25 Mar 2019
- Last updated
- 1 Apr 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes
Publications
Dramowski A, Pillay S, Bekker A, Abrahams I, Cotton MF, Coffin SE, Whitelaw AC. Impact of 1% chlorhexidine gluconate bathing and emollient application on bacterial pathogen colonization dynamics in hospitalized preterm neonates - A pilot clinical trial. EClinicalMedicine. 2021 Jun 18;37:100946. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.100946. eCollection 2021 Jul.
PubMed 34195575
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Apr 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Impact of 1% Chlorhexidine Gluconate and/or Emollient on Neonatal Bacterial Colonization Dynamics
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03896893
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- N18/07/068
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 80 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of StellenboschUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Fogarty International Center of the National Institute of Health
- Study start
- 4 Mar 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Sep 2019 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Sep 2019 (estimated)
- First posted
- 1 Apr 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study will evaluate the effect of skin antisepsis and/or emollient therapy on bacterial colonization dynamics in very low birth weight, hospitalized infants. Bacterial swabs from 5 body sites will be collected at baseline, day 3, day 8 and day 13 following study arm assignment. Study outcomes include changes in bacterial colony counts, burden of gram-negative and gram-positive pathogens and overall skin score.
Detailed description
Despite substantial global decline in childhood mortality rates, equivalent progress in neonatal mortality reduction has not been achieved. Severe bacterial infection affects approximately 6.9 million neonates and causes an estimated 750 000 deaths in low-middle income countries (LMIC) annually. The neonatal period extends from birth to 28 days of life, although neonatal hospitalization episodes (and therefore infection risk) are often substantially prolonged in preterm infants. In South Africa, infections account for 13.8% of neonatal mortality (following prematurity and intrapartum hypoxia). The South African Perinatal Problem Identification Programme (PPIP) cites nosocomial infection as the second most prevalent avoidable factor in neonatal deaths. Developing new approaches to prevent infection in hospitalized and preterm newborns in LMIC is key to achieving the Sustainable Development targets for under-five child survival.
The risk for hospital-onset sepsis in African neonates is disproportionately high and influenced by many factors including: high rates of prematurity and low birth weight; increasing in-hospital births, understaffing of maternity and neonatal services and limited implementation of infection prevention practices. Of infections among hospitalized neonates in high-income settings, hospital-acquired bloodstream infections (HA-BSI) predominate, accounting for 57% of infections. Research addressing the problem of hospital-onset neonatal infection should therefore focus on BSI prevention. A key target for sepsis reduction is prevention of intrapartum and post-delivery acquisition of bacterial colonization. Although the pathogenesis of bacterial colonization preceding invasive infection is well-accepted, there is limited data describing neonatal bacterial colonization dynamics in low-resource settings. Full characterization of timing, source and route of bacterial acquisition, flora/pathogen distribution, balance and changes over time is needed to identify all potential targets for neonatal BSI prevention.
Emollient therapy and reduction of pathogen colonization through skin antisepsis, are potentially useful targets for reducing risk of hospital-acquired BSI in neonates. Emollients (oils, creams and ointments) have been applied daily or bi-daily in neonatal research and routine practice settings, to promote skin integrity in preterm infants <37 weeks' gestation. The postulated mechanism of effect is improved skin barrier function and promotion of normal flora colonization, which may prevent pathogen ingress and subsequent invasive infection. A 2016 Cochrane review of emollient therapy for sepsis prevention in preterm infants found no evidence of reduced mortality or bloodstream infection rates, but the authors concluded that further studies in low-resource settings were warranted.
Chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) is a bisbiguanide molecule with broad-spectrum antiseptic activity producing membrane disruption through increased cell permeability and bacterial lysis. Efficacy and safety of daily CHG bathing to prevent pediatric bacteremia was established in a multicenter, cluster-randomized trial for infants >2 months in intensive care (ICU) using 2% CHG-impregnated cloths. Three high-quality studies of newborn CHG skin or cord cleansing showed reduced neonatal mortality and omphalitis in community-based neonates. Safety of topical CHG application for neonates has been established at concentrations ≤1%, although there is little data available on its use in premature, hospitalized neonates.
CHG skin cleansing and emollient therapy are potentially useful interventions for prevention of hospital-acquired BSI in neonates from low-resource settings. In addition, these interventions are suitable for inclusion in a neonatal sepsis prevention care bundle, should they be found to be effective, safe and feasible. In addition these interventions would be low-cost, easily scalable and potentially, a maternally-administered intervention. This study will evaluate the effect of skin antisepsis and/or emollient therapy on bacterial colonization dynamics in very low birth weight, hospitalized infants. Bacterial swabs from 5 body sites will be collected at baseline, day 3, day 8 and day 13 following study arm assignment. Study outcomes include changes in bacterial colony counts, burden of gram-negative and gram-positive pathogens and overall skin score.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Sequential
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 4
- Model description
- Enrolled babies will be sequentially recruited to one of 4 study arms (see below).
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Standard of Care | No intervention | –Routine bathing and skin care as per hospital practice |
| 1% chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) | Experimental | Other: Skin antisepsis1% aqueous CHG applied from the neck down with cotton swabs daily on weekdays (total of 8 days CHG application) |
| Emollient therapy | Experimental | Other: EmollientAquaphor skin cream applied from the neck down daily on weekdays (total of 8 days emollient application) |
| 1% CHG plus emollient therapy | Experimental | Other: Skin antisepsis, Other: Emollient1% aqueous CHG applied from the neck down with cotton swabs daily on weekdays followed immediately by Aquaphor skin cream (total of 8 days CHG application plus emollient application) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- Up to 3 days
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Birth weight ≥1000g and ≤ 1500g (equivalent to gestational age 28 - 32 weeks)
- Day 1 or 2 or 3 of life
- Anticipated length of hospital stay > 7 days.
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Birth weight <1000g or >1500g
- Mother not present, unable or unwilling to provide consent for enrolment
- Any skin condition or congenital defect that could potentially result in enhanced CHG absorption (skin blistering/bullae, congenital anomalies e.g. gastroschisis, spina bifida)
- Anticipated length of hospital stay < 7 days.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Skin antisepsis1% aqueous chlorhexidine gluconate | Other | 1% CHG plus emollient therapy, 1% chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) |
| EmollientAquaphor skin cream | Other | 1% CHG plus emollient therapy, Emollient therapy |
Primary outcome
Change in median bacterial colony counts by body site over time
Time frame: baseline, day 3, day 8 and day 13 post enrolment
Change in Gram negative pathogen burden by body site over time
Time frame: baseline, day 3, day 8 and day 13 post enrolment
Change in Gram positive pathogen burden by body site over time
Time frame: baseline, day 3, day 8 and day 13 post enrolment
Change in median skin condition score over time (Grading scale adapted by Darmstadt from Lane at al)
Time frame: Daily from enrolment to day 13 post enrolment
Darmstadt skin score uses a 9-point scale (calculated as the sum of points for each of 3 items: skin eythema, dryness and breakdown, with a minimum score of 1 and maximum score of 3, representing worst possible skin condition for each sub-scale, total sum of points is a minimum score of 3 and maximum score of 9 for worst possible skin condition)
2 secondary outcomes
Incidence of laboratory-confirmed sepsis
Time frame: up until day 28 of life
Incidence of clinically-suspected sepsis
Time frame: up until day 28 of life
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Apr 2019.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34195575Dramowski A, Pillay S, Bekker A, Abrahams I, Cotton MF, Coffin SE, Whitelaw AC. Impact of 1% chlorhexidine gluconate bathing and emollient application on bacterial pathogen colonization dynamics in hospitalized preterm neonates - A pilot clinical trial. EClinicalMedicine. 2021 Jun 18;37:100946. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.100946. eCollection 2021 Jul.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes
Related trials for Neonatal SEPSIS
RecruitingPhase 3
Selective Antibiotics When Symptoms Develop Versus Universal Antibiotics for Preterm Neonates
Sepsis, PROM, Preterm (Pregnancy)
Not yet recruitingEarly Phase 1
25BT056: Basket Study of Viral Cytotoxic T Lymphocytes
EBV Viremia, CMV Viremia
Not yet recruiting
G-CSF In Neonatal Sepsis With Neutropenia
Neonatal Sepsis, Neutropenia
RecruitingObservational study
Impact of a Multi-infusion Strategy in Neonatology on the Rate of Central Line-associated Bloodstream Infections
Neonatal Infection
RecruitingObservational study
Dopamine vs. Norepinephrine for Hypotension in Very Preterm Infants With Late-onset Sepsis
Late-Onset Neonatal Sepsis, Extreme Prematurity
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Skin antisepsis and Emollient in people with Neonatal SEPSIS and Prematurity, run by University of Stellenbosch at 1 site in South Africa.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Apr 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in South Africa. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Angela Dramowski, MD, PhD (+27219389506, dramowski@sun.ac.za), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in median bacterial colony counts by body site over time (time frame: baseline, day 3, day 8 and day 13 post enrolment). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03896893, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Apr 2019.