AzTrials
AzTrials

AgingNCT03902743

Anticipatory Care Planning Intervention for Older Adults at Risk of Functional Decline: A Primary Care Feasibility Study

A study testing Anticipatory Care Plan group in people with Aging, run by Queen's University, Belfast at 1 site in United Kingdom.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to explore the feasibility of delivering anticipatory care planning provided by nurses through a series of home visits. Many people with long-term health conditions can benefit from an anticipatory care plan as it helps them feel more in control of their life and allows them to manage… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 70 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Aging
What is being tested?
Anticipatory Care Plan group
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
64 participants
Where
1 siteUnited Kingdom
Study dates
12 Mar 2019to Aug 2020
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 70 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Aged ≥70 years
  • In receipt of a valid general medical services (GMS) card in the Republic of Ireland, or for Northern Ireland registered for NHS primary care services
  • ability to complete a postal questionnaire

Who cannot join

  • receiving specialist palliative care
  • record of assessed cognitive impairment at the level that would impact their ability to complete screening postal questionnaire, outcome measures and participate in a patient care conference(s) (defined as Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) ≤20)
  • experiencing a psychotic episode at the time of recruitment
  • hospitalised long-term, in a nursing home, homeless or in sheltered accommodation

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United Kingdom1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Queens University Belfast

    Belfast, BT9 7BL

    Kevin Brazil, PhD, (0)28 9097 ext. 5782, k.brazil@qub.ac.uk

    Recruiting

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

The purpose of this study is to explore the feasibility of delivering anticipatory care planning provided by nurses through a series of home visits. Many people with long-term health conditions can benefit from an anticipatory care plan as it helps them feel more in control of their life and allows them to manage changes in their health and well-being. The purpose of this study is to find out if effect of home visits by specially trained nurses for people aged 70 years and over who have been identified as being 'at risk' of developing frailty would be beneficial. Half of the patients in this study will receive home visits from trained nurses in addition to their usual care. Nurses will work with their GP, other healthcare providers and possibly family caregivers to plan and arrange any additional services that the participants require. The other half of patients in the study will receive usual care.

Read the detailed description

Aim: to determine the feasibility of a cluster randomised trial to evaluate the implementation and outcomes of Anticipatory Care Planning (ACP) in primary care to assist older adults identified as at risk for functional decline by developing a personalised support plan.

Design and sample:

We will perform a feasibility cluster randomised controlled trial where 8 primary care practises will be randomly assigned (4 facilities per arm) to the intervention group versus usual care alone. Randomisation will be stratified according to location (Northern Ireland /Republic of Ireland - Louth, Monaghan). Primary care practices will be randomly allocated to the intervention or usual care arm before patient screening for risk of functional decline. A total of 64 patients (32 per study arm, 8 patients, randomly selected, per primary care practise) will be enrolled into the study. A sample of 32 patients per study arm is considered adequate to allow the size of any definitive trial to be determined more accurately and therefore minimise the number of patients required overall.

Setting:

Practices located in Northern Ireland will be recruited via the Northern Ireland Clinical Research Network (Primary Care). In the Republic of Ireland the HRB Primary Care Trials Network will recruit primary care practises located in the border counties of Louth and Monaghan. Practises will be drawn from both urban and rural settings that serve a socioeconomically deprived population.

Patient enrolment:

Individuals who screen as at risk of functional decline will be sent a letter from their GP inviting them to participate in the study. A project research assistant will recruit consenting patients by telephone. Allocation to the intervention vs. usual care will be communicated to the study participant by a member of the research team after the research assistant has obtained consent and conducted the baseline-standardised interview. In the case of two or more eligible participants in any one household, all will be eligible for enrolment into the study. In the intervention arm the study nurse employed by the project will then commence arrangements to visit the appropriate patients.

Intervention:

The nurse led ACP intervention will be integrated into regular care where the study nurse will involve the patients' GP in care planning and is informed about patients' goals and plans. As a first step in the intervention, the study nurse will contact the patient by telephone to schedule an initial home visit. This will typically be conducted within 4 weeks of the return of the participant's PRISMA 7 postal questionnaire. At the initial home visit the study nurse will, with the aid of a medical summary including current repeat prescription provided by the GP practise, will employ a structured protocol conduct a brief Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) that will also encourage discussion about present and future care and patient goals.

Following the initial home visit the study nurse will draft a structured summary report of the home visit that will include patient goals, preferences for care, identified problems and action list. The study nurse will forward to a pharmacist, who will be an adjunct to the study, the summary report generated from the brief CGA highlighting the patient medication list and the identification of potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP). The pharmacist will cross check and verify the presence of PIPs. A record will be maintained by the pharmacist on the accuracy of the study nurse identifying PIPs during the trial. The results of this audit will contribute to the finalisation of the intervention. Subsequent to PIP feedback from the pharmacist the study nurse will finalize the summary report and will meet with the GP who will be informed through a structured format patients goals and wishes, results of the patient assessment, problem list and recommended actions. The GP with appropriate participation of other members of the health care team, will review, provide feedback and confirm agreement with the plan of care.

In the second home visit the study nurse will meet with the patient and family carer to discuss identified problems, review proposed options for support, document the agreed support plan and consider options for follow up and set a date for review. The study nurse may conduct, depending on clinical need, the second visit in the patients' home or the GP practise so the GP can be present. The finalised care plan will be left with the patient and a copy will be placed in the patient's chart in the GP practise.

All outcome measures will be assessed at baseline, six weeks and six months.

Conditions
Aging
Being tested
Anticipatory Care Plan group

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Anticipatory Care Plan groupOther

    The Anticipatory Care Plan will be delivered by a trained nurse. At the initial visit, the nurse will conduct a hollistic assessment using the EasyCare Assessment Tool. Following this visit, the nurse will draft a strucutred summary report of the home visit to include patient goals, preferences for care, identified problems and action list. The nurse will then consult with a pharmacist to identify any potential inappropriate prescribing. The nurse will then meet with the participants GP and review and provide feedback. The nurse will then re visit participants and discuss the report and agree a support plan and actions for follow up.

Study groups in NCT03902743
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Intervention groupExperimentalParticipants will receive an Anticipatory Care Plan
Receives: Other: Anticipatory Care Plan group
Control groupNo interventionUsual care

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. EQ-5D-5L

    Is a widely used self-reported generic measure of health reported quality of life that has been validated in different patient populations. The five-level version contains the same dimensions as the earlier three-level version but has been designed to provide greater reliability and sensitivity.

    Measured: 10 minutes

  2. Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D)

    This 20- item scale has been used extensively with older adults. Respondents use a four choice scale to rate how they have felt in the past week expressing depressed mood.

    Measured: 10 minutes

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) Scale

    This 20 item scale was designed to assess from the patient perspective the receipt of patient-centered care and self-management behaviors.

    Measured: 15 minutes

  2. Health Economic Evaluation

    The health economic analysis will consist of trial-based economic evaluation and will incorporate both cost effectiveness analysis and cost utility analysis to compare the alternative treatment strategies: (1) the Anticipatory Care Planning (ACP) Intervention; and (2) usual care in general practice.

    Measured: 15 minutes

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted4 Apr 2019
  2. Study start12 Mar 2019
  3. Primary completionFeb 2020 (estimated)
  4. Study completionAug 2020 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
64 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03902743
Sponsor's protocol ID
B18/46
Status last verified
Nov 2019
First submitted
2 Apr 2019
Last updated
7 Nov 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Plan in preparation

Publications

  • Brazil K, Cardwell C, Carter G, Clarke M, Corry DAS, Fahey T, Gillespie P, Hobbins A, McGlade K, O'Halloran P, O'Neill N, Wallace E, Doyle F. Anticipatory care planning for community-dwelling older adults at risk of functional decline: a feasibility cluster randomized controlled trial. BMC Geriatr. 2022 May 25;22(1):452. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03128-x.

    PubMed 35610581
  • Corry DAS, Carter G, Doyle F, Fahey T, Gillespie P, McGlade K, O'Halloran P, O'Neill N, Wallace E, Brazil K. Successful implementation of a trans-jurisdictional, primary care, anticipatory care planning intervention for older adults at risk of functional decline: interviews with key health professionals. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Aug 25;21(1):871. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06896-1.

    PubMed 34433441
  • Brazil K, Scott D, Wallace E, Clarke M, Fahey T, Gillespie P, O'Halloran P, Cardwell C, Carter G, McGlade K, Doyle F. Anticipatory care planning intervention for older adults at risk of functional decline: study protocol for a primary care cluster feasibility randomised trial. Trials. 2020 Feb 11;21(1):168. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-4100-2.

    PubMed 32046767

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Anticipatory Care Plan group in people with Aging, run by Queen's University, Belfast at 1 site in United Kingdom.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Nov 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Kevin Brazil, PhD ((0)28 9097 ext. 5782, k.brazil@qub.ac.uk), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

EQ-5D-5L (time frame: 10 minutes). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03902743, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Nov 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in