AzTrials
AzTrials

Diabetic RetinopathyNCT03903042

Comparison of Aurora Fundus Camera With Traditional Camera in Diabetic Retinopathy With Visual Artificial Intelligence

An observational study of Diabetic Retinopathy, run by Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine at 1 site in China.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study aims to compare the effect of Aurora handheld fundus camera with traditional desktop fundus camera in the fundus photography screening of diabetic patients, and to evaluate the effect of artificial intelligence algorithm in the diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Diabetic Retinopathy
How many people
300 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
1 Nov 2018to May 2019
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients who were diagnosed with diabetes, more than 18 years of age, male or female Chinese patients.

Who may be able to join

  • Participants are more than 18 years of age, male or female Chinese patients;
  • Diagnosed with diabetes;
  • Prior written informed consent should be obtained

Who cannot join

  • Patients with invisible fundus caused by any cause;
  • Patients or his/her licensor unwill to sign an informed consent or follow this protocol;
  • Pregnant women

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

China1 site
  • Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine

    Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200080

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: Comparison of Aurora Fundus Camera With Traditional Fundus Camera in Diabetic Retinopathy With Phoebus Visual Artificial Intelligence

This study aims to compare the effect of Aurora handheld fundus camera with traditional desktop fundus camera in the fundus photography screening of diabetic patients, and to evaluate the effect of artificial intelligence algorithm in the diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy.

Read the detailed description

Aurora handheld fundus cameras are used to take fundus photography on diabetic patients in 3 ophthalmic diabetic retinopathy screening centers in China to compare its effect with the hospital's traditional desktop fundus camera, and evaluate the auxiliary diagnostic effect of Phoebus artificial intelligence algorithm in diabetic retinopathy.

Keywords
Aurora fundus camera, Artificial intelligence, Diabetic retinopathy
Medical subject headings
Diabetic Retinopathy

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT03903042
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Group 1Center 1: Traditional camera(Canon) vs Aurora camera
Group 2Center 2: Traditional camera(Zeiss) vs Aurora camera
Group 3Center 3: Traditional camera(Topcon) vs Aurora camera

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Image Quality of Aurora camera

    Score of Image Quality

    Measured: within 3 months

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Outcome of gold standard

    Gold standard: 8 photographs of one patient(4 by Aurora camera, 4 by traditional camera) by ophthalmologist(double blinded)

    Measured: within 3 months

  2. Image of Aurora camera

    Images taken by Aurora camera

    Measured: 1 month

  3. Image of traditional camera (Center 1: Canon)

    Image taken by traditional camera(Center 1: Canon, pupil not dilated)

    Measured: 1 month

  4. Image of traditional camera (Center 2: Zeiss)

    Image taken by traditional camera(Center 2: Zeiss, pupil dilated)

    Measured: 1 month

  5. Image of traditional camera (Center 3: Topcon)

    Image taken by traditional camera(Center 3: Topcon, pupil dilated)

    Measured: 1 month

  6. Outcome of artificial intelligence algorithm

    Outcome of artificial intelligence algorithm(Normal or Referral Required)

    Measured: 3 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted4 Apr 2019
  2. Study start1 Nov 2018
  3. Primary completionMay 2019 (estimated)
  4. Study completionMay 2019 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
300 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03903042
Sponsor's protocol ID
Shanghai1stAI
Status last verified
Apr 2019
First submitted
3 Apr 2019
Last updated
4 Apr 2019
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Clinical Study Report will be published

Publications

  • Jin G, Xiao W, Ding X, Xu X, An L, Congdon N, Zhao J, He M. Prevalence of and Risk Factors for Diabetic Retinopathy in a Rural Chinese Population: The Yangxi Eye Study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2018 Oct 1;59(12):5067-5073. doi: 10.1167/iovs.18-24280.

    PubMed 30357401
  • Zheng X, Zhang L. A study of retinopathy analysis in type 2 diabetes patients in Chinese population. Pak J Pharm Sci. 2018 Sep;31(5(Supplementary)):2041-2046.

    PubMed 30393210
  • Hendrick AM, Gibson MV, Kulshreshtha A. Diabetic Retinopathy. Prim Care. 2015 Sep;42(3):451-64. doi: 10.1016/j.pop.2015.05.005.

    PubMed 26319349
  • Wong TY, Bressler NM. Artificial Intelligence With Deep Learning Technology Looks Into Diabetic Retinopathy Screening. JAMA. 2016 Dec 13;316(22):2366-2367. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.17563. No abstract available.

    PubMed 27898977
  • Abramoff MD, Niemeijer M, Russell SR. Automated detection of diabetic retinopathy: barriers to translation into clinical practice. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2010 Mar;7(2):287-96. doi: 10.1586/erd.09.76.

    PubMed 20214432
  • Li Z, Keel S, Liu C, He Y, Meng W, Scheetz J, Lee PY, Shaw J, Ting D, Wong TY, Taylor H, Chang R, He M. An Automated Grading System for Detection of Vision-Threatening Referable Diabetic Retinopathy on the Basis of Color Fundus Photographs. Diabetes Care. 2018 Dec;41(12):2509-2516. doi: 10.2337/dc18-0147. Epub 2018 Oct 1.

    PubMed 30275284

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Diabetic Retinopathy, run by Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Apr 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Image Quality of Aurora camera (time frame: within 3 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03903042, which also lists 6 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Apr 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in