Diabetic RetinopathyNCT03904056
ETDRS PRP With IVR Versus Retinal Photocoagulation Targeted to Ischemic Retina With IVR for the Treatment of PDR
A study testing ISQ-RP and ETDRS-PRP group in people with Diabetic Retinopathy, run by São Paulo State University.
Trial summary
Purpose: To compare panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) as described in ETDRS Study combined with intravitreal injection of ranibizumab (IVR) (ETDRS-PRP group) and retinal photocoagulation targeted to ischemic retina combined with IVR (ISQ-RP group) in patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Diabetic Retinopathy
- What is being tested?
- ISQ-RP and ETDRS-PRP group
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 23 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 1 Jan 2014to 1 Jul 2017
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- adult patients with treatment-naive PDR and a best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) better than 20/800
Who cannot join
- Presence of advanced PDR, i.e., vitreous hemorrhage that would prevent documentation of the fundoscopic examination or administration of PRP, or presence of traction retinal detachment;
- presence of ring-shaped retinal neovascularization extending along both temporal arcades and the optic disc;
- an abnormality of the vitreoretinal interface in the macular region that would lead the investigator to consider the necessity of pars plana vitrectomy;
- intravitreal injection of corticosteroids or other antiangiogenic drugs during the prior 6 months;
- inability of patient to fixate and perform reliable automated static perimetry;
- cataract surgery during the prior 3 months;
Show all 12Show fewer
- history of pars plana vitrectomy or scleral buckle;
- acute ocular infection;
- allergy to fluorescein;
- medical or psychological conditions that would prevent the patient from giving written informed consent or completing the study;
- significant uncontrolled disease that, in the opinion of the investigator, would prevent the patient from completing the study;
- participation in another clinical study during the previous 30 days.
About this study
Official title: ETDRS Panretinal Photocoagulation (PRP) Combined With Intravitreal Ranibizumab (IVR) Versus Retinal Photocoagulation Targeted to Ischemic Retina Combined With IVR for the Treatment of Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy
Purpose: To compare panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) as described in ETDRS Study combined with intravitreal injection of ranibizumab (IVR) (ETDRS-PRP group) and retinal photocoagulation targeted to ischemic retina combined with IVR (ISQ-RP group) in patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR).
Design: Randomized prospective clinical trial. Methods: Patients with PDR were assigned to receive either PRP plus IVR (20 eyes) or retinal photocoagulation targeted to ischemic areas plus IVR (20 eyes). ETDRS best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central subfield macular thickness (CSFT) measured by optical coherence tomography (OCT) were performed at baseline and every 4 weeks through week 48. Area of fluorescein leakage from active new vessels (FLA) was measured every 12 weeks. Full-field electroretinography (ERG) was recorded at baseline and after 3 months.
Read the detailed description
This parallel clinical trial was approved by the local Research Ethics Committee, and all subjects gave written informed consent to participate. Between August 2014 and July 2016, all adult patients with treatment-naive PDR and a best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) better than 20/800 evaluated at our facility were invited to participate in the study.
During the recruitment phase, twenty-three consecutive patients who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were enrolled into the study. At baseline visit, each patient underwent detailed ophthalmologic assessment including BCVA measurement according to standardized ETDRS refraction protocols using modified ETDRS cards 1, 2 and R; applanation tonometry; slit-lamp biomicroscopy examination under mydriasis (including classification of crystalline lens opacity status using the Lens Opacities Classification System - LOCS III) (13); and indirect funduscopic examination. Digital ocular stereoscopic fundus photographs (TRC-50DX - IMAGEnet; Topcon, Tokyo, Japan), wide field fluorescein angiography and spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) (HRA-OCT, Heidelberg, Germany) were also performed.
Randomization and treatment groups
Patients were randomly assigned using a computer-generated sequence, to one of the following two treatment groups:
ETDRS-PRP Group: patients were treated in two sessions (week 0 and week 2) of 800-900 shots, for a total of 1600-1800 shots with a shot duration of 100 ms and power modulated in order to generate moderately white spots on the retina.
ISQ-RP Group: patients were treated with single-spot targeted retinal photocoagulation directed toward areas of retinal nonperfusion detected by fluorescein angiography. In this group, laser treatment was also performed in two sessions (week 0 and 2), with a shot duration of 100 ms, but spots were placed 1/2 burn apart and power modulated in order to generate moderately white spots on the retina.
For both groups, retinal photocoagulation was performed with single-spot full-scatter PRP using Purepoint green diode laser (Alcon, Fortworth, Texas) with an Ocular Mainster PRP 165 lens with a dynamic field of view of 180 degrees, and a 200 micron spot size (which produces a 392 micron spot size on the retina). Intravitreal injection of 0.5 mg (0.05 ml) ranibizumab (Lucentis®) (IVR) were performed 180 minutes after the first laser session (week 0) by a single retina specialist.
Intravitreal injection Intravitreal injections were performed in a clinic setting 180 minutes after retinal photocoagulation with a disposable syringe with a BD Ultra-FineTM 29G ½" needle, via the pars plana 3.5 mm posterior to the limbus, using topical anesthesia. After the procedure, optic nerve perfusion was assessed by indirect binocular ophthalmoscopy, with paracenthesis of the anterior chamber considered in cases of poor perfusion. After injection, patients were instructed to use antibiotic eyedrops (0.5% moxifloxacin), according to drug label, one drop every 4 hours for one week, in the eye which received the intravitreal injection.
Ophthalmologic evaluations Comprehensive ophthalmic evaluations, including ETDRS BCVA and central subfield macular thickness (CSFT) measured by SD-OCT as described elsewhere (15) were performed at baseline and every 4 weeks through week 48.
Area of fluorescein leakage from active new vessels (FLA) was measured by wide field fluorescein angiography at baseline and at weeks 4, 8, 12, 24, 36 and 48 using fluorescein angiography pictures taken 2.0 to 3.0 minutes after the injection of fluorescein dye. Local and systemic adverse effects, including changes in intraocular pressure and in crystalline lens status, were monitored throughout the study.
Retreatment criteria At follow-up visits from week 12 to 48, patients were treated quarterly with an IVR (0.5 mg in 0.05 ml) if FA demonstrated the presence of actively leaking retinal neovascularization. From weeks 4 to 48, patients could receive monthly IVR if SD-OCT demonstrated a CSFT of more than 300 µm.
ERG protocol Full-field ERG was performed at baseline, and 12, 24 and 48 weeks after treatment (ColorDome and Espion E2 - Diagnosys LLC, Middleton, MA, USA). ERG was executed in accordance to ISCEV standard [20] using DTL as positive electrodes. Skin electrodes (Red-Dot - 3M) were placed on each temporal orbital rim to serve as references, and on forehead as ground. A- and b-wave amplitude and implicit time were evaluated.
After 30 min dark adaptation, a series of flashes with increasing luminance was used as light stimuli: 0.003, 0.01 (rod ERG), 0.03, 0.1, 0.3, 1.0, 3.0 (combined rod-cone ERG) and 10 cd.s/m2. Oscillatory potentials were filtered out of combined rod-cone ERG, using an off-line fast-Fourrier algorithm set as a band-pass frequency filter (75 - 300 Hz) as previously described [21], and area under the curve (OP-AUC) between a- and b-wave implicit time was calculated.
Thereafter, patients were light adapted for 10 min, and photopic ERG measurements were also performed a series of increasing stimuli luminance: 0.1, 0.3, 1.0, 3.0 (cone ERG), 10.0 and 30.0 cd.s/m2, followed by the 30 Hz flicker (background during photopic stimulation = 30 cd/m2).
Sample size
The sample size estimation was based on the standard deviation of fluorescein leakage area of a previous study where PRP plus ranibizumab was used for proliferative diabetic retinopathy treatment (11). Considering this previous study, with a sample size of 15 patients per group, there is an 80% power to detect a mean difference of 2 mm2 between both groups.
Statistics Baseline data were compared using one-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey-Kramer testing for multiple mean comparisons, while group comparisons during follow-up were performed using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with "group", "time" and "group cross time" as effects, followed by Tukey HSD testing. Calculations were performed using JMP 10.0 (SAS). The significance level was set at p<0.05.
- Conditions
- Diabetic Retinopathy
- Being tested
- ISQ-RP, ETDRS-PRP group
- Keywords
- Diabetic Retinopathy, Macular Edema
- Medical subject headings
- Diabetic Retinopathy, Macular Edema
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
ISQ-RPProcedure or surgery
Also called intravitreal injection of ranibizumab (IVR)
Patients were treated with single-spot targeted retinal photocoagulation directed toward areas of retinal nonperfusion detected by fluorescein angiography. In this group, laser treatment was performed in two sessions (week 0 and 2), with a shot duration of 100 ms, but spots were placed 1/2 burn apart and power modulated in order to generate moderately white spots on the retina.
Retinal photocoagulation was performed with single-spot full-scatter PRP using Purepoint green diode laser (Alcon, Fortworth, Texas) with an Ocular Mainster PRP 165 lens with a dynamic field of view of 180 degrees, and a 200 micron spot size (which produces a 392 micron spot size on the retina). Intravitreal injection of 0.5 mg (0.05 ml) ranibizumab (Lucentis®) (IVR) were performed 180 minutes after the first laser session (week 0) by a single retina specialist.
ETDRS-PRP groupProcedure or surgery
Panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) as described in ETDRS Study combined with intravitreal injection of ranibizumab
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| ETDRS-PRP group | Active comparator | Patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy submitted to panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) as described in ETDRS Study combined with intravitreal injection of ranibizumab (IVR) (ETDRS-PRP group) if angluofluoresceinography demonstrated the presence of actively leaking retinal neovascularization or SD-OCT demonstrated a CSFT of more than 300 µm. Receives: Procedure: ETDRS-PRP group |
| ISQ-RP group | Experimental | Patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy submitted to retinal photocoagulation targeted to ischemic retina combined with intravitreal injection of ranibizumab (IVR) if angluofluoresceinography demonstrated the presence of actively leaking retinal neovascularization or SD-OCT demonstrated a CSFT of more than 300 µm. Receives: Procedure: ISQ-RP |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Fluorescein leakage area of active new vessels (FLA)
Compare the Area of fluorescein leakage from active new vessels in both groups in mm2 measured by wide field fluorescein angiography (Optomap 200TX; Optos PLC., Dunfermline, Scotland, United Kingdom)
Measured: 48 weeks
Secondary outcomes (4)
Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA)
Compare the Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in both groups according to standardized ETDRS refraction protocols using modified ETDRS cards
Measured: 48 weeks
Central subfield thickness (CSFT)
Compare the Central subfield thickness (CSFT) between both groups using spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) (HRA-OCT, Heidelberg, Germany)
Measured: 48 weeks
Number of Ranibizumab Intravitreal Injections
to compare the number of Ranibizumab Intravitreal Injections in both groups
Measured: 48 weeks
Electroretinography
To compare Electroretinography response in both groups using Diagnosys LLD - Espion E2 Electroretinography System
Measured: 48 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 Apr 2019
- Study start1 Jan 2014
- Primary completion1 Jul 2017
- Study completion1 Jul 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Diabetic RetinopathyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 23 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- São Paulo State University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03904056
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 4160/2014
- Status last verified
- Apr 2019
- First submitted
- 11 Feb 2019
- Last updated
- 4 Apr 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Toscano L, Messias A, Messias K, de Cenco Lopes R, Ribeiro JAS, Scott IU, Jorge R. Proliferative diabetic retinopathy treated with intravitreal ranibizumab and photocoagulation directed at ischemic retinal areas-A randomized study. Doc Ophthalmol. 2021 Dec;143(3):313-322. doi: 10.1007/s10633-021-09848-6. Epub 2021 Aug 4.
PubMed 34347216
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Apr 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- ETDRS Panretinal Photocoagulation (PRP) Combined With Intravitreal Ranibizumab (IVR) Versus Retinal Photocoagulation Targeted to Ischemic Retina Combined With IVR for the Treatment of Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03904056
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 4160/2014
- Conditions
- Diabetic Retinopathy
- Keywords
- Diabetic Retinopathy, Macular Edema
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 23 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- São Paulo State UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jan 2014 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Jul 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Jul 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 4 Apr 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Purpose: To compare panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) as described in ETDRS Study combined with intravitreal injection of ranibizumab (IVR) (ETDRS-PRP group) and retinal photocoagulation targeted to ischemic retina combined with IVR (ISQ-RP group) in patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR).
Design: Randomized prospective clinical trial. Methods: Patients with PDR were assigned to receive either PRP plus IVR (20 eyes) or retinal photocoagulation targeted to ischemic areas plus IVR (20 eyes). ETDRS best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central subfield macular thickness (CSFT) measured by optical coherence tomography (OCT) were performed at baseline and every 4 weeks through week 48. Area of fluorescein leakage from active new vessels (FLA) was measured every 12 weeks. Full-field electroretinography (ERG) was recorded at baseline and after 3 months.
Detailed description
This parallel clinical trial was approved by the local Research Ethics Committee, and all subjects gave written informed consent to participate. Between August 2014 and July 2016, all adult patients with treatment-naive PDR and a best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) better than 20/800 evaluated at our facility were invited to participate in the study.
During the recruitment phase, twenty-three consecutive patients who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were enrolled into the study. At baseline visit, each patient underwent detailed ophthalmologic assessment including BCVA measurement according to standardized ETDRS refraction protocols using modified ETDRS cards 1, 2 and R; applanation tonometry; slit-lamp biomicroscopy examination under mydriasis (including classification of crystalline lens opacity status using the Lens Opacities Classification System - LOCS III) (13); and indirect funduscopic examination. Digital ocular stereoscopic fundus photographs (TRC-50DX - IMAGEnet; Topcon, Tokyo, Japan), wide field fluorescein angiography and spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) (HRA-OCT, Heidelberg, Germany) were also performed.
Randomization and treatment groups
Patients were randomly assigned using a computer-generated sequence, to one of the following two treatment groups:
ETDRS-PRP Group: patients were treated in two sessions (week 0 and week 2) of 800-900 shots, for a total of 1600-1800 shots with a shot duration of 100 ms and power modulated in order to generate moderately white spots on the retina.
ISQ-RP Group: patients were treated with single-spot targeted retinal photocoagulation directed toward areas of retinal nonperfusion detected by fluorescein angiography. In this group, laser treatment was also performed in two sessions (week 0 and 2), with a shot duration of 100 ms, but spots were placed 1/2 burn apart and power modulated in order to generate moderately white spots on the retina.
For both groups, retinal photocoagulation was performed with single-spot full-scatter PRP using Purepoint green diode laser (Alcon, Fortworth, Texas) with an Ocular Mainster PRP 165 lens with a dynamic field of view of 180 degrees, and a 200 micron spot size (which produces a 392 micron spot size on the retina). Intravitreal injection of 0.5 mg (0.05 ml) ranibizumab (Lucentis®) (IVR) were performed 180 minutes after the first laser session (week 0) by a single retina specialist.
Intravitreal injection Intravitreal injections were performed in a clinic setting 180 minutes after retinal photocoagulation with a disposable syringe with a BD Ultra-FineTM 29G ½" needle, via the pars plana 3.5 mm posterior to the limbus, using topical anesthesia. After the procedure, optic nerve perfusion was assessed by indirect binocular ophthalmoscopy, with paracenthesis of the anterior chamber considered in cases of poor perfusion. After injection, patients were instructed to use antibiotic eyedrops (0.5% moxifloxacin), according to drug label, one drop every 4 hours for one week, in the eye which received the intravitreal injection.
Ophthalmologic evaluations Comprehensive ophthalmic evaluations, including ETDRS BCVA and central subfield macular thickness (CSFT) measured by SD-OCT as described elsewhere (15) were performed at baseline and every 4 weeks through week 48.
Area of fluorescein leakage from active new vessels (FLA) was measured by wide field fluorescein angiography at baseline and at weeks 4, 8, 12, 24, 36 and 48 using fluorescein angiography pictures taken 2.0 to 3.0 minutes after the injection of fluorescein dye. Local and systemic adverse effects, including changes in intraocular pressure and in crystalline lens status, were monitored throughout the study.
Retreatment criteria At follow-up visits from week 12 to 48, patients were treated quarterly with an IVR (0.5 mg in 0.05 ml) if FA demonstrated the presence of actively leaking retinal neovascularization. From weeks 4 to 48, patients could receive monthly IVR if SD-OCT demonstrated a CSFT of more than 300 µm.
ERG protocol Full-field ERG was performed at baseline, and 12, 24 and 48 weeks after treatment (ColorDome and Espion E2 - Diagnosys LLC, Middleton, MA, USA). ERG was executed in accordance to ISCEV standard [20] using DTL as positive electrodes. Skin electrodes (Red-Dot - 3M) were placed on each temporal orbital rim to serve as references, and on forehead as ground. A- and b-wave amplitude and implicit time were evaluated.
After 30 min dark adaptation, a series of flashes with increasing luminance was used as light stimuli: 0.003, 0.01 (rod ERG), 0.03, 0.1, 0.3, 1.0, 3.0 (combined rod-cone ERG) and 10 cd.s/m2. Oscillatory potentials were filtered out of combined rod-cone ERG, using an off-line fast-Fourrier algorithm set as a band-pass frequency filter (75 - 300 Hz) as previously described [21], and area under the curve (OP-AUC) between a- and b-wave implicit time was calculated.
Thereafter, patients were light adapted for 10 min, and photopic ERG measurements were also performed a series of increasing stimuli luminance: 0.1, 0.3, 1.0, 3.0 (cone ERG), 10.0 and 30.0 cd.s/m2, followed by the 30 Hz flicker (background during photopic stimulation = 30 cd/m2).
Sample size
The sample size estimation was based on the standard deviation of fluorescein leakage area of a previous study where PRP plus ranibizumab was used for proliferative diabetic retinopathy treatment (11). Considering this previous study, with a sample size of 15 patients per group, there is an 80% power to detect a mean difference of 2 mm2 between both groups.
Statistics Baseline data were compared using one-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey-Kramer testing for multiple mean comparisons, while group comparisons during follow-up were performed using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with "group", "time" and "group cross time" as effects, followed by Tukey HSD testing. Calculations were performed using JMP 10.0 (SAS). The significance level was set at p<0.05.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| ETDRS-PRP group | Active comparator | Procedure: ETDRS-PRP groupPatients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy submitted to panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) as described in ETDRS Study combined with intravitreal injection of ranibizumab (IVR) (ETDRS-PRP group) if angluofluoresceinography demonstrated the presence of actively leaking retinal neovascularization or SD-OCT demonstrated a CSFT of more than 300 µm. |
| ISQ-RP group | Experimental | Procedure: ISQ-RPPatients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy submitted to retinal photocoagulation targeted to ischemic retina combined with intravitreal injection of ranibizumab (IVR) if angluofluoresceinography demonstrated the presence of actively leaking retinal neovascularization or SD-OCT demonstrated a CSFT of more than 300 µm. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- adult patients with treatment-naive PDR and a best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) better than 20/800
Key exclusion criteria (12 listed)
- Presence of advanced PDR, i.e., vitreous hemorrhage that would prevent documentation of the fundoscopic examination or administration of PRP, or presence of traction retinal detachment;
- presence of ring-shaped retinal neovascularization extending along both temporal arcades and the optic disc;
- an abnormality of the vitreoretinal interface in the macular region that would lead the investigator to consider the necessity of pars plana vitrectomy;
- intravitreal injection of corticosteroids or other antiangiogenic drugs during the prior 6 months;
- inability of patient to fixate and perform reliable automated static perimetry;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| ISQ-RPAlso: intravitreal injection of ranibizumab (IVR)Patients were treated with single-spot targeted retinal photocoagulation directed toward areas of retinal nonperfusion detected by fluorescein angiography. In this group, laser treatment was performed in two sessions (week 0 and 2), with a shot duration of 100 ms, but spots were placed 1/2 burn apart and power modulated in order to generate moderately white spots on the retina. Retinal photocoagulation was performed with single-spot full-scatter PRP using Purepoint green diode laser (Alcon, Fortworth, Texas) with an Ocular Mainster PRP 165 lens with a dynamic field of view of 180 degrees, and a 200 micron spot size (which produces a 392 micron spot size on the retina). Intravitreal injection of 0.5 mg (0.05 ml) ranibizumab (Lucentis®) (IVR) were performed 180 minutes after the first laser session (week 0) by a single retina specialist. | Procedure or surgery | ISQ-RP group |
| ETDRS-PRP groupPanretinal photocoagulation (PRP) as described in ETDRS Study combined with intravitreal injection of ranibizumab | Procedure or surgery | ETDRS-PRP group |
Primary outcome
Fluorescein leakage area of active new vessels (FLA)
Time frame: 48 weeks
Compare the Area of fluorescein leakage from active new vessels in both groups in mm2 measured by wide field fluorescein angiography (Optomap 200TX; Optos PLC., Dunfermline, Scotland, United Kingdom)
4 secondary outcomes
Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA)
Time frame: 48 weeks
Central subfield thickness (CSFT)
Time frame: 48 weeks
Number of Ranibizumab Intravitreal Injections
Time frame: 48 weeks
Electroretinography
Time frame: 48 weeks
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Apr 2019.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34347216Toscano L, Messias A, Messias K, de Cenco Lopes R, Ribeiro JAS, Scott IU, Jorge R. Proliferative diabetic retinopathy treated with intravitreal ranibizumab and photocoagulation directed at ischemic retinal areas-A randomized study. Doc Ophthalmol. 2021 Dec;143(3):313-322. doi: 10.1007/s10633-021-09848-6. Epub 2021 Aug 4.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Diabetic Retinopathy
Recruiting
Implementing AI-based Glaucoma Screening Within Federally Qualified Health Centers
Glaucoma, Ocular Hypertension
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Real World Evidence in China: Faricimab Use in Diabetic Macular Edema, Retinal Vein Occlusion, and Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration (The Farseeing Study)
Diabetic Macular Edema, Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Long-Term Follow-Up Study of RGX-314 Administered in the Suprachoroidal Space for Participants With and Without Diabetic Retinopathy
Diabetic Retinopathy, DR
Recruiting
To Investigate the Feasibility and Acceptability of Trained Non-medical Professionals Performing Laser Treatment for Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (PDR), and the Potential Impact on Service Capacity. Assess Feasibility of Conducting a Full Trial Comparing Trained ECPs With Ophthalmologists
Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (PDR)
RecruitingPhase 2
Oral N-Acetylcysteine on Diabetic Macular Edema
Diabetic Macular Edema (DME)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing ISQ-RP and ETDRS-PRP group in people with Diabetic Retinopathy, run by São Paulo State University.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Apr 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Fluorescein leakage area of active new vessels (FLA) (time frame: 48 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03904056, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Apr 2019.