AzTrials
AzTrials

Open-angle GlaucomaPhase 4NCT03904381

Efficacy and Safety of XEN® Gel Stent and Post-operative Management in Patients With Open Angle Glaucoma

A Phase 4 study testing 5-fluorouracil, Transconjunctival needling and Transconjunctival revision in people with Open-angle Glaucoma, run by Wroclaw Medical University at 1 site in Poland.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

To evaluate the efficacy of postoperative management with 5-fluorouracil injections after XEN Gel Stent implantation. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Open-angle Glaucoma
What is being tested?
5-fluorouracil, Transconjunctival needling and Transconjunctival revision
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
100 participants
Where
1 sitePoland
Study dates
1 Jan 2016to 1 Jan 2025
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • diagnosis of primary open angle glaucoma
  • trabecular meshwork visible in gonioscopy
  • medicated IOP of ≥ 15 mmHg and ≤ 35 mmHg
  • taking 1 to 5 IOP-lowering medications
  • area of healthy, free and mobile conjunctiva in the target quadrant (superior-nasal)
  • signed inform consent

Who cannot join

  • angle closure glaucoma
  • secondary open angle glaucoma
  • previous glaucoma shunt/valve in the target quadrant
  • presence of conjunctival scarring, prior conjunctival surgery or other conjunctival pathologies (e.g., pterygium) in the target quadrant
  • active inflammation (e.g., blepharitis, conjunctivitis, keratitis, uveitis)
  • active iris neovascularization or neovascularization of the iris within 6 months of the surgical date
Show all 13Show fewer
  • anterior chamber intraocular lens
  • presence of intraocular silicone oil
  • vitreous present in the anterior chamber
  • impaired episcleral venous drainage (e.g., Sturge-Weber or nanophthalmos or other evidence of elevated venous pressure)
  • known or suspected allergy or sensitivity to drugs required for the surgical procedure or any of the device components (e.g., porcine products or glutaraldehyde)
  • history of dermatologic keloid formation
  • previous photorefractive keratectomy

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Poland1 site
  • Department of Ophthalmology

    Wroclaw, 54-622

Other trials in Poland

About this study

Official title: Efficacy and Safety of XEN® Gel Stent and Post-operative Management in Patients With Open Angle Glaucoma Compared to Classic Glaucoma Surgeries (Trabeculectomy and Sclerectomy) as Well as Other Minilally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery (MIGS)

To evaluate the efficacy of postoperative management with 5-fluorouracil injections after XEN Gel Stent implantation.

Being tested
5-fluorouracil, Transconjunctival needling, Transconjunctival revision
Medical subject headings
Glaucoma, Open-Angle

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • 5-fluorouracilDrug

    5-fluorouracil subconjunctival injections were a first-choice therapy for bleb failure and were administered according to predetermined criteria.

  • Transconjunctival needlingProcedure or surgery

    Transconjunctival needling was administered according to predetermined criteria.

  • Transconjunctival revisionProcedure or surgery

    Transconjunctival revision was administered according to predetermined criteria.

Study groups in NCT03904381
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
stand-alone procedure of XEN implantation in phakic eyesActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Drug: 5-fluorouracil; Procedure: Transconjunctival needling; Procedure: Transconjunctival revision
stand-alone procedure of XEN implantation in pseudophakic eyesActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Drug: 5-fluorouracil; Procedure: Transconjunctival needling; Procedure: Transconjunctival revision
XEN implantation combined with cataract extractionActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Drug: 5-fluorouracil; Procedure: Transconjunctival needling; Procedure: Transconjunctival revision

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Unqualified success

    Unqualified success of glaucoma treatment, defined as a postoperative IOP <18 mmHg and >20% reduction compared with the baseline value, achieved without use of any antiglaucoma medication and with no detected glaucoma progression as assessed at the final follow-up visit.

    Measured: 5 years

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Qualified success score A

    Qualified success of glaucoma treatment, defined as a postoperative IOP <21 mmHg and >20% reduction compared with the baseline value, achieved with or without use of antiglaucoma medication and with no detected glaucoma progression as assessed at the final follow-up visit.

    Measured: 5 years

  2. Qualified success score B

    Qualified success of glaucoma treatment, defined as a postoperative IOP < 18 mmHg and >20% reduction compared with the baseline value, achieved with or without use of antiglaucoma medication and with no detected glaucoma progression as assessed at the final follow-up visit.

    Measured: 5 years

  3. Qualified success score C

    Qualified success of glaucoma treatment, defined as a postoperative IOP ≤15 mmHg and >40% reduction compared with the baseline value, achieved with or without use of antiglaucoma medication and with no detected glaucoma progression as assessed at the final follow-up visit.

    Measured: 5 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted5 Apr 2019
  2. Study start1 Jan 2016
  3. Primary completion1 Jan 2024 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Jan 2025 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
100 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03904381
Sponsor's protocol ID
STM.C240.17.037
Status last verified
Mar 2022
First submitted
3 Apr 2019
Last updated
29 Mar 2022
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Budenz DL, Rhee P, Feuer WJ, McSoley J, Johnson CA, Anderson DR. Comparison of glaucomatous visual field defects using standard full threshold and Swedish interactive threshold algorithms. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002 Sep;120(9):1136-41. doi: 10.1001/archopht.120.9.1136.

    PubMed 12215086
  • Susanna R Jr, Vessani RM. Staging glaucoma patient: why and how? Open Ophthalmol J. 2009 Sep 17;3:59-64. doi: 10.2174/1874364100903020059.

    PubMed 19834563

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing 5-fluorouracil, Transconjunctival needling and Transconjunctival revision in people with Open-angle Glaucoma, run by Wroclaw Medical University at 1 site in Poland.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Mar 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Poland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Unqualified success (time frame: 5 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03904381, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Mar 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in