Inguinal HerniaNCT03904888
Conventional Versus Robot Assisted Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair
A study testing r-TAPP, l-TAPP and local anesthetics in people with Inguinal Hernia, run by Algemeen Ziekenhuis Maria Middelares at 1 site in Belgium.
Trial summary
Evaluate the early postoperative course of patients undergoing laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair with either a conventional or a robot assisted approach and with or without the injection of the trocar wounds with a local anesthetic. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Inguinal Hernia
- What is being tested?
- r-TAPP, l-TAPP and local anesthetics
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 200 participants
- Where
- 1 siteBelgium
- Study dates
- 23 Sep 2019to Dec 2029
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- adult patients presenting with a bilateral inguinal hernia planned for a minimal invasive laparoscopic repair
Who cannot join
- Age below 18 years
- unilateral groin hernia repair
- incarcerated hernias
- open hernia repair
- no informed consent
- pregnant women
- ASA score 4 or more
- patient included in another study.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Belgium1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
AZ Maria Middelares
Ghent, 9000
Filip Muysoms, MD, PhD, 0032-92467400, filip.muysoms@azmmsj.be
Rita Baumgartner, MSc, 0032 - 92467451, rita.baumgartner@azmmsj.be
About this study
Evaluate the early postoperative course of patients undergoing laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair with either a conventional or a robot assisted approach and with or without the injection of the trocar wounds with a local anesthetic.
Read the detailed description
Introduction Inguinal hernia is a common disease with a high lifetime risk; 27 % for men and 3% for women. These hernias can be categorized as lateral, medial or femoral according to the classification of the European Hernia Society. The manifestations may vary from an asymptomatic swelling till an incarcerated or strangulated hernia requiring an urgent operation.
The introduction of mesh reinforcement for groin hernia repair has resulted in reducing the rate of recurrences and chronic pain. Moreover, laparoscopic repair techniques made it possible to place the mesh in de pre-peritoneal space by a transperitoneal (TAPP) or pre-peritoneal (TEP) approach. These minimally invasive techniques are not only associated with less chronic pain or numbness, but also with an earlier return to normal activities or work. A favor for one of the two techniques has not yet been proven.
At the Hernia Center Maria Middelares a laparoscopic transabdominal pre-peritoneal (l-TAPP) approach is favored in the majority of adult patients presenting with a groin hernia since more than 20 years. The investigators have adopted a technique using one large pre-peritoneal self-fixating mesh that covers both groins in bilateral laparoscopic repairs. In September 2016 the investigators started to use a robot assisted laparoscopic approach (r-TAPP) for groin hernia repair and built proficiency in this technique with 120 cases operated in the first year of adoption. Barriers to adopting robot assisted groin hernia repair are insufficient availability of the robot, perception of longer operative time, perceived lack of clinical benefit for the patient and increased cost for instrumentation.
In a learning curve study using the daVinci Xi robotic system the investigators have shown that after about 25 cases the skin to skin operating time for r-TAPP equals the skin to skin operating time for l-TAPP. Similarly the overall OR time (patient in and out of the OR) is not increased for r-TAPP compared to l-TAPP if the whole team including nurses and anesthetists have become proficient in robotic assisted surgery (Clinical Trials identifier: NCT0975401).
The investigators standard technique for repair of bilateral groin hernias is to use a self-fixating mesh placed in a pre-peritoneal position with a TAPP approach. The investigator prefers to use one large mesh covering the myopectineal orifice of both groins with a width of 28 cm and a length of 13 cm. The mesh used is a Progrip self-fixating mesh (Medtronic, US), which is a monofilament polyester mesh to which resorbable PLA grips have been added to fixate the mesh to the underlying tissue during the period of mesh ingrowth and incorporation. This technique has been studied in our department in a prospective study focusing on early and one year outcome and has shown favorable results (Clinical Trials identifier: NCT02525666 ).
This study aims to differentiate between the early postoperative recovery after laparoscopic repair of bilateral groin hernias treated either with r-TAPP or with l-TAPP.
A total of 200 male and female patients will be entered in the trial in Maria Middelares Ghent, for which an inclusion period of 24 months is anticipated. Patients will be screened and invited to participate at the outpatient clinic.
Study set-up:
- Based on clinical examination and/or ultrasonography 200 patients will be selected.
- Preoperative, during the outpatients' visit, patients will be asked to sign Informed Consent and to fill out the EuraHS-QoL (Quality of Life score) questionnaire.
- Patients will be randomized, to receive either conventional laparoscopic repair (100 patients) or robot assisted laparoscopic repair (100 patients). Patients will be blinded to the surgical method.
- Furthermore patients will be randomized to either receive local anesthetics (50 patients in each group) or none (50 patients in each group)
- Postoperatively, patients will be invited for clinical follow-up with quality of life evaluations with the EuraHS-QoL score at 1 month and at 12 months.
- Conditions
- Inguinal Hernia
- Being tested
- r-TAPP, l-TAPP, local anesthetics
- Medical subject headings
- Hernia, Inguinal
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
r-TAPPProcedure or surgery
Robot-assisted repair
l-TAPPProcedure or surgery
Laporoscopic repair
local anestheticsProcedure or surgery
local anesthetics will be administred
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| l-TAPP without local anesthetics | Other | These patients will undergo a laparoscopic surgery without local anaesthetics. Receives: Procedure: l-TAPP |
| l-TAPP with local anesthetics | Other | These patients will undergo a laparoscopic surgery with local anaesthetics. Receives: Procedure: l-TAPP; Procedure: local anesthetics |
| r-TAPP without local anesthetics | Other | These patients will undergo a robot-assisted surgery without local anaesthetics. Receives: Procedure: r-TAPP |
| r-TAPP with local anesthetics | Other | These patients will undergo a robot-assisted surgery with local anaesthetics. Receives: Procedure: r-TAPP; Procedure: local anesthetics |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
change in PADSS score
Time postoperative for the patient to get fit for discharge as determined by a PADSS score (Post Anesthesia Discharge Scoring System) to reach ≥ 9 (10 is maximum). The score will be taken at 2 hourly intervals after surgery (0 hours,2 hours,4 hours,6 hours,8 hours,10 hours,12 hours,14 hours,16 hours,18 hours,20 hours,22 hours,24 hours) up to 24 hours or unitl score is ≥ 9.
Measured: change of Baseline PADSS score up to 24h after surgery or unitl score is ≥ 9
Secondary outcomes (2)
Recurrence rate
Recurrence rate will be assessed at 12 months post-operatively
Measured: at 12 month
Quality of Life assessment: EuraHS Quality of Life questionnaire
Quality of Life assessment using the EuraHS Quality of Life questionnaire. The questionnaire consists of 9 questions. Each question has a scale from 0-10, wherease 0 is considered the best outcome. Total score (max.90) is assessed by summerizing the scale of each question.
Measured: 1 month and 12 months post-operatively
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 Apr 2019
- Study start23 Sep 2019
- Primary completionDec 2028 (estimated)
- Study completionDec 2029 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Inguinal HerniaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Algemeen Ziekenhuis Maria Middelares
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Filip Muysoms, Algemeen Ziekenhuis Maria Middelares
- Investigators
- Filip Muysoms, MD,PhD, Principal investigator, Algemeen Ziekenhuis Maria Middelares
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03904888
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Coraline Study
- Status last verified
- Aug 2026
- First submitted
- 19 Mar 2019
- Last updated
- 6 Aug 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Aug 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Conventional Versus Robot Assisted Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03904888
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Coraline Study
- Conditions
- Inguinal Hernia
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Algemeen Ziekenhuis Maria MiddelaresUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 23 Sep 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Dec 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Dec 2029 (estimated)
- First posted
- 5 Apr 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Evaluate the early postoperative course of patients undergoing laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair with either a conventional or a robot assisted approach and with or without the injection of the trocar wounds with a local anesthetic.
Detailed description
Introduction Inguinal hernia is a common disease with a high lifetime risk; 27 % for men and 3% for women. These hernias can be categorized as lateral, medial or femoral according to the classification of the European Hernia Society. The manifestations may vary from an asymptomatic swelling till an incarcerated or strangulated hernia requiring an urgent operation.
The introduction of mesh reinforcement for groin hernia repair has resulted in reducing the rate of recurrences and chronic pain. Moreover, laparoscopic repair techniques made it possible to place the mesh in de pre-peritoneal space by a transperitoneal (TAPP) or pre-peritoneal (TEP) approach. These minimally invasive techniques are not only associated with less chronic pain or numbness, but also with an earlier return to normal activities or work. A favor for one of the two techniques has not yet been proven.
At the Hernia Center Maria Middelares a laparoscopic transabdominal pre-peritoneal (l-TAPP) approach is favored in the majority of adult patients presenting with a groin hernia since more than 20 years. The investigators have adopted a technique using one large pre-peritoneal self-fixating mesh that covers both groins in bilateral laparoscopic repairs. In September 2016 the investigators started to use a robot assisted laparoscopic approach (r-TAPP) for groin hernia repair and built proficiency in this technique with 120 cases operated in the first year of adoption. Barriers to adopting robot assisted groin hernia repair are insufficient availability of the robot, perception of longer operative time, perceived lack of clinical benefit for the patient and increased cost for instrumentation.
In a learning curve study using the daVinci Xi robotic system the investigators have shown that after about 25 cases the skin to skin operating time for r-TAPP equals the skin to skin operating time for l-TAPP. Similarly the overall OR time (patient in and out of the OR) is not increased for r-TAPP compared to l-TAPP if the whole team including nurses and anesthetists have become proficient in robotic assisted surgery (Clinical Trials identifier: NCT0975401).
The investigators standard technique for repair of bilateral groin hernias is to use a self-fixating mesh placed in a pre-peritoneal position with a TAPP approach. The investigator prefers to use one large mesh covering the myopectineal orifice of both groins with a width of 28 cm and a length of 13 cm. The mesh used is a Progrip self-fixating mesh (Medtronic, US), which is a monofilament polyester mesh to which resorbable PLA grips have been added to fixate the mesh to the underlying tissue during the period of mesh ingrowth and incorporation. This technique has been studied in our department in a prospective study focusing on early and one year outcome and has shown favorable results (Clinical Trials identifier: NCT02525666 ).
This study aims to differentiate between the early postoperative recovery after laparoscopic repair of bilateral groin hernias treated either with r-TAPP or with l-TAPP.
A total of 200 male and female patients will be entered in the trial in Maria Middelares Ghent, for which an inclusion period of 24 months is anticipated. Patients will be screened and invited to participate at the outpatient clinic.
Study set-up:
- Based on clinical examination and/or ultrasonography 200 patients will be selected.
- Preoperative, during the outpatients' visit, patients will be asked to sign Informed Consent and to fill out the EuraHS-QoL (Quality of Life score) questionnaire.
- Patients will be randomized, to receive either conventional laparoscopic repair (100 patients) or robot assisted laparoscopic repair (100 patients). Patients will be blinded to the surgical method.
- Furthermore patients will be randomized to either receive local anesthetics (50 patients in each group) or none (50 patients in each group)
- Postoperatively, patients will be invited for clinical follow-up with quality of life evaluations with the EuraHS-QoL score at 1 month and at 12 months.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| l-TAPP without local anesthetics | Other | Procedure: l-TAPPThese patients will undergo a laparoscopic surgery without local anaesthetics. |
| l-TAPP with local anesthetics | Other | Procedure: l-TAPP, Procedure: local anestheticsThese patients will undergo a laparoscopic surgery with local anaesthetics. |
| r-TAPP without local anesthetics | Other | Procedure: r-TAPPThese patients will undergo a robot-assisted surgery without local anaesthetics. |
| r-TAPP with local anesthetics | Other | Procedure: r-TAPP, Procedure: local anestheticsThese patients will undergo a robot-assisted surgery with local anaesthetics. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- adult patients presenting with a bilateral inguinal hernia planned for a minimal invasive laparoscopic repair
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Age below 18 years
- unilateral groin hernia repair
- incarcerated hernias
- open hernia repair
- no informed consent
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| r-TAPPRobot-assisted repair | Procedure or surgery | r-TAPP with local anesthetics, r-TAPP without local anesthetics |
| l-TAPPLaporoscopic repair | Procedure or surgery | l-TAPP with local anesthetics, l-TAPP without local anesthetics |
| local anestheticslocal anesthetics will be administred | Procedure or surgery | l-TAPP with local anesthetics, r-TAPP with local anesthetics |
Primary outcome
change in PADSS score
Time frame: change of Baseline PADSS score up to 24h after surgery or unitl score is ≥ 9
Time postoperative for the patient to get fit for discharge as determined by a PADSS score (Post Anesthesia Discharge Scoring System) to reach ≥ 9 (10 is maximum). The score will be taken at 2 hourly intervals after surgery (0 hours,2 hours,4 hours,6 hours,8 hours,10 hours,12 hours,14 hours,16 hours,18 hours,20 hours,22 hours,24 hours) up to 24 hours or unitl score is ≥ 9.
2 secondary outcomes
Recurrence rate
Time frame: at 12 month
Quality of Life assessment: EuraHS Quality of Life questionnaire
Time frame: 1 month and 12 months post-operatively
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Aug 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Inguinal Hernia
Active, not recruiting
Urinary Catheterization Versus No Catheterization in Laparoscopic Total Extraperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair
Inguinal Hernias
Recruiting
Comparison of Two Surgical Techniques for Indirect Inguinal Hernia Repair
Indirect Inguinal Hernia
Recruiting
Permanent Versus Slowly Dissolving Stitches for Non-Mesh (Shouldice) Groin Hernia Repair
Inguinal Hernia
Not yet recruiting
Quadro-Iliac Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair
Inguinal Hernia Unilateral, Postoperative Pain
Recruiting
Effect of Anterior Iliac Block on Postoperative Analgesia and Patient Satisfaction in Inguinal Hernia Repair Surgery
Anterior Ilıac Block, Hernia Surgery
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Filip Muysoms, MD,PhD principal investigator
Algemeen Ziekenhuis Maria Middelares
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing r-TAPP, l-TAPP and local anesthetics in people with Inguinal Hernia, run by Algemeen Ziekenhuis Maria Middelares at 1 site in Belgium.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Aug 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Belgium. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Filip Muysoms, MD,PhD (+32477325710, filip.muysoms@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
change in PADSS score (time frame: change of Baseline PADSS score up to 24h after surgery or unitl score is ≥ 9). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Aug 2026.