Metastatic CancerEXERTNCT03905356
Exercise Therapy in Radiation Therapy
A study testing Exercise Therapy in people with Metastatic Cancer, run by Milton S. Hershey Medical Center at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate exercise therapy as a method for potentially improving radiation therapy treatment toxicities for metastatic cancer patients receiving radiation therapy. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Metastatic Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Exercise Therapy
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 16 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 12 Feb 2020to 31 Jan 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Males and females ≥18 years of age
- Fluent in written and spoken English
- Must be able to provide and understand informed consent
- Must have an ECOG PS of ≤ 2
- Diagnosed with metastatic disease
- Cancer patients (stage 1-4)
Show all 11Show fewer
- Treatment to primary site or metastatic disease
- Scheduled to receive radiation therapy at Penn State Cancer Institute
- Absence of absolute contraindications for exercise according to the American Heart Association (see below)
- Primary attending oncologist approval
- Receiving treatment as an outpatient
Who cannot join
- Receiving radiation therapy at a location other than Penn State Cancer Institute
- Not fluent in written and spoken English
- Evidence in the medical record of an absolute contraindication for exercise
- Performing > 90 minutes/week of physical activity at the time of initial evaluation
- Cardiac exclusion criteria:
- Class II, III or IV heart failure as defined by the New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classification system
Show all 21Show fewer
- History of acute coronary syndromes (including myocardial infarction and unstable angina), coronary angioplasty or stenting within the past 6 months prior to the start of radiation therapy
- Uncontrolled arrhythmias; patients with rate controlled atrial fibrillation for >1 month prior to start of radiation therapy may be eligible
- syncope
- acute myocarditis, pericarditis, or endocarditis
- acute pulmonary embolus or pulmonary infarction
- thrombosis of lower extremities
- suspected dissecting aneurysm
- pulmonary edema
- respiratory failure
- acute non-cardiopulmonary disorder that may affect exercise performance or be aggravated by exercise
- mental impairment leading to inability to cooperate
- Pregnant women
- In-patient receiving radiation therapy for a radiation emergency (e.g. cord compression, SVC syndrome, brain metastases)
- High risk of fracture or spine instability (Mirels score ≥7, SINS ≥7)
- Children (the protocol will only include individuals 18 and older)
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Penn State Cancer Institute
Hershey, Pennsylvania, 17033
About this study
Official title: Exercise Therapy in Radiation Therapy (EXERT)
The purpose of this study is to evaluate exercise therapy as a method for potentially improving radiation therapy treatment toxicities for metastatic cancer patients receiving radiation therapy.
Read the detailed description
Study Objectives and Endpoints:
Aim 1. To determine the acceptability, feasibility, and safety of an exercise intervention among cancer patients receiving radiation therapy. The investigators anticipate that >25% of approached patients will consent to the protocol; >33% of eligible radiation therapy patients who consent will perform the exercise prescribed (based on the response rate from EnACT); and <25% of participants will experience a musculoskeletal impairment (without treatment alterations) and <5% will experience a musculoskeletal injury with symptoms lasting ≥ week or requiring medical attention. The investigators' approach will be to include patients receiving definitive RT; excluding patients at high risk for side effects from combination therapy, including fracture or cardiovascular events.
Aim 2. To discern the clinical outcomes of patients receiving RT+ET. The hypothesis is that adding ET to RT will improve patient reported outcomes and physical functioning. The investigators' approach will be to use standardized questionnaires and assessment tools: patient reported outcomes will be assessed using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events - Patient Reported Outcomes (CTCAE-PROs), loaded onto tablets that patients use in the clinic. Questions will assess global PROs relevant to the ability to tolerate RT, including fatigue, pain, nausea, vomiting; and disease-site-specific PROs, including genitourinary/sexual symptoms for patients receiving pelvic RT. RT dose alterations will be documented. Scores will be compared pre- vs post- RT. The investigators will also use standardized measures already used in EnACT, including grip strength, 30-second chair stand, timed up-and-go, and 4-stage balance. Scores will be compared pre- vs post- RT.
- Conditions
- Metastatic Cancer
- Being tested
- Exercise Therapy
- Medical subject headings
- Neoplasm Metastasis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Exercise TherapyBehavioural
Certified exercise oncology specialists will personalize, prescribe, and guide ET, including twice weekly resistance training and walking, performed at home, with supervision in the Exercise Medicine Unit. The cancer exercise physiologist will teach participants proper warm ups, use of equipment, exercise form, modes of activity, intensity of exercise, flexibility exercises, and cool down. In addition, patients will be instructed to exercise on their own, at home, according to the instructions from the cancer exercise specialist.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Exercise | Experimental | The exercise intervention will utilize the "Moving Through Cancer: A Guide to Exercise for Cancer Survivors" framework. A certified cancer exercise physiologist will work through this guide at radiation therapy visits, with at least 1 visit per week, per the study schema. The cancer exercise physiologist will teach participants proper: warm ups, use of equipment, exercise form, modes of activity, intensity of exercise, flexibility exercises, and cool down. The cancer exercise physiologist will tailor the instruction to convey special considerations for exercise based on treatment and cancer type. The patient will perform supervised exercise in the Exercise Medicine Unit under the guidance of the cancer exercise specialist. The exercise done will be educational in nature (i.e. learning about proper walking form, proper intensity for a warmup/cool down, proper techniques for resistance exercises). Receives: Behavioral: Exercise Therapy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Acceptability of exercise intervention: (number of patients agreeing to perform RT+ET)/(number approached)
(number of patients agreeing to perform RT+ET)/(number approached)
Measured: 1 year
Feasibility of exercise intervention: (number of patients who completed RT+ET)/(number agreeing to perform RT+ET)
(number of patients who completed RT+ET)/(number agreeing to perform RT+ET)
Measured: 1 year
Incidence of Treatment- Emergent Adverse Events
Safety of exercise intervention: freedom from any Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade 3 or higher event
Measured: 1 year
Secondary outcomes (9)
Change in timed up and go
Timed up and go
Measured: 3 Months
change in grip strength
Grip strength
Measured: 3 Months
change in quality of life measured via the Godin Physical Activity Questionnaire
The Godin Physical Activity Questionnaire asks how much physical activity the participant engages in during a typical 7-day period.
Measured: 3 Months
change in quality of life measured via the Barriers to Exercise RM 5-FM survey
The Barriers to Exercise RM 5-FM survey asks participants about barriers to being active. Response options include: very likely; somewhat likely; somewhat unlikely; very unlikely.
Measured: 3 Months
change in quality of life measured via the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire
The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire ask about the effect of the participant's health problems on the ability to work and perform regular activities. A variety of question/response styles are included in the survey.
Measured: 3 Months
change in quality of life measured via the Scored Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment
The Score Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment asks about participant nutrition. A variety of question/response styles are included in the survey.
Measured: 3 Months
change in quality of life measured via the EORTC questionnaire
The EORTC Quality of life questionnaire asks a variety of questions about their health regarding physical abilities. Response options include: not at all; a little; quite a bit; very much.
Measured: 3 Months
change in quality of life measured via the ECHO EXERT survey
The Experience of Care and Health Outcomes (ECHO) Survey asks three questions about participant experience with the exercise intervention. Response options include: not at all; not much; mixed; somewhat; very much so.
Measured: 3 Months
change in quality of life measured via the Health Belief Scale
The Health Belief Scale asks questions regarding exercise therapy. Response options include: strongly disagree - strongly agree, where 1 equals strongly disagree and 4 equals strongly agree.
Measured: 3 Months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 Apr 2019
- Study start12 Feb 2020
- Primary completion26 Jan 2022
- Study completion31 Jan 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Metastatic CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Milton S. Hershey Medical CenterThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 16 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Kathleen Sturgeon, Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
- Investigators
- Kathleen Sturgeon, PhD, Principal investigator, Penn State College of Medicine
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03905356
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- STUDY00010618
- Acronym
- EXERT
- Status last verified
- May 2023
- First submitted
- 28 Mar 2019
- Last updated
- 6 May 2023
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 May 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Exercise Therapy in Radiation Therapy (EXERT)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03905356
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- EXERT / STUDY00010618
- Conditions
- Metastatic Cancer
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 16 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Milton S. Hershey Medical CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 12 Feb 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 26 Jan 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Jan 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 5 Apr 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate exercise therapy as a method for potentially improving radiation therapy treatment toxicities for metastatic cancer patients receiving radiation therapy.
Detailed description
Study Objectives and Endpoints:
Aim 1. To determine the acceptability, feasibility, and safety of an exercise intervention among cancer patients receiving radiation therapy. The investigators anticipate that >25% of approached patients will consent to the protocol; >33% of eligible radiation therapy patients who consent will perform the exercise prescribed (based on the response rate from EnACT); and <25% of participants will experience a musculoskeletal impairment (without treatment alterations) and <5% will experience a musculoskeletal injury with symptoms lasting ≥ week or requiring medical attention. The investigators' approach will be to include patients receiving definitive RT; excluding patients at high risk for side effects from combination therapy, including fracture or cardiovascular events.
Aim 2. To discern the clinical outcomes of patients receiving RT+ET. The hypothesis is that adding ET to RT will improve patient reported outcomes and physical functioning. The investigators' approach will be to use standardized questionnaires and assessment tools: patient reported outcomes will be assessed using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events - Patient Reported Outcomes (CTCAE-PROs), loaded onto tablets that patients use in the clinic. Questions will assess global PROs relevant to the ability to tolerate RT, including fatigue, pain, nausea, vomiting; and disease-site-specific PROs, including genitourinary/sexual symptoms for patients receiving pelvic RT. RT dose alterations will be documented. Scores will be compared pre- vs post- RT. The investigators will also use standardized measures already used in EnACT, including grip strength, 30-second chair stand, timed up-and-go, and 4-stage balance. Scores will be compared pre- vs post- RT.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Exercise | Experimental | Behavioral: Exercise TherapyThe exercise intervention will utilize the "Moving Through Cancer: A Guide to Exercise for Cancer Survivors" framework. A certified cancer exercise physiologist will work through this guide at radiation therapy visits, with at least 1 visit per week, per the study schema. The cancer exercise physiologist will teach participants proper: warm ups, use of equipment, exercise form, modes of activity, intensity of exercise, flexibility exercises, and cool down. The cancer exercise physiologist will tailor the instruction to convey special considerations for exercise based on treatment and cancer type. The patient will perform supervised exercise in the Exercise Medicine Unit under the guidance of the cancer exercise specialist. The exercise done will be educational in nature (i.e. learning about proper walking form, proper intensity for a warmup/cool down, proper techniques for resistance exercises). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Males and females ≥18 years of age
- Fluent in written and spoken English
- Must be able to provide and understand informed consent
- Must have an ECOG PS of ≤ 2
- Diagnosed with metastatic disease
Key exclusion criteria (21 listed)
- Receiving radiation therapy at a location other than Penn State Cancer Institute
- Not fluent in written and spoken English
- Evidence in the medical record of an absolute contraindication for exercise
- Performing > 90 minutes/week of physical activity at the time of initial evaluation
- Cardiac exclusion criteria:
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Exercise TherapyCertified exercise oncology specialists will personalize, prescribe, and guide ET, including twice weekly resistance training and walking, performed at home, with supervision in the Exercise Medicine Unit. The cancer exercise physiologist will teach participants proper warm ups, use of equipment, exercise form, modes of activity, intensity of exercise, flexibility exercises, and cool down. In addition, patients will be instructed to exercise on their own, at home, according to the instructions from the cancer exercise specialist. | Behavioural | Exercise |
Primary outcome
Acceptability of exercise intervention: (number of patients agreeing to perform RT+ET)/(number approached)
Time frame: 1 year
(number of patients agreeing to perform RT+ET)/(number approached)
Feasibility of exercise intervention: (number of patients who completed RT+ET)/(number agreeing to perform RT+ET)
Time frame: 1 year
(number of patients who completed RT+ET)/(number agreeing to perform RT+ET)
Incidence of Treatment- Emergent Adverse Events
Time frame: 1 year
Safety of exercise intervention: freedom from any Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade 3 or higher event
9 secondary outcomes
Change in timed up and go
Time frame: 3 Months
change in grip strength
Time frame: 3 Months
change in quality of life measured via the Godin Physical Activity Questionnaire
Time frame: 3 Months
change in quality of life measured via the Barriers to Exercise RM 5-FM survey
Time frame: 3 Months
change in quality of life measured via the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire
Time frame: 3 Months
change in quality of life measured via the Scored Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment
Time frame: 3 Months
change in quality of life measured via the EORTC questionnaire
Time frame: 3 Months
change in quality of life measured via the ECHO EXERT survey
Time frame: 3 Months
change in quality of life measured via the Health Belief Scale
Time frame: 3 Months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 May 2023.
Related trials for Metastatic Cancer
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study Comparing TAK-928 With Docetaxel in Adults With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
IO Resistant Squamous and Nonsquamous NSCLC
RecruitingPhase 2
A Clinical Study on Prophylactic RespOnse To hEtrombopag for Secondary Prevention in Anti-Cancer Therapy-induced Thrombocytopeniae
Breast Cancer Patients at High Risk of Chemotherapy-induced Thrombocytopenia (CTIT)
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
A Study of Mesothelin-Targeted CAR-Mix Cells in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors
Mesothelin-Positive Advanced Solid Tumors With Peritoneal Metastasis
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Trastuzumab Deruxtecan and Lovastatin in HER2-low and Ultralow Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer
Breast Cancer, Advanced Breast Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
Audit of Targeted Sentinel Node Biopsy (TSNB) in Patients With Limited Nodal Disease Undergoing Primary Surgery
Breast Cancer, Axillary Lymph Nodes Dissection
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Kathleen Sturgeon, PhD principal investigator
Penn State College of Medicine
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Exercise Therapy in people with Metastatic Cancer, run by Milton S. Hershey Medical Center at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 11 inclusion and 21 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 May 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Acceptability of exercise intervention: (number of patients agreeing to perform RT+ET)/(number approached) (time frame: 1 year). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 May 2023.