AzTrials
AzTrials

Parturient Who Underwent Epidural Anesthesia During Which an Unintentional Dural Punctur OccurredNCT03908424

Chronic Headache and Chronic Backache Following Unintentional Dural Puncture at Delivery Room.

An observational study of Parturient Who Underwent Epidural Anesthesia During Which an Unintentional Dural Punctur Occurred and Parturient Who Develop a Postdural Puncture Headache, run by Shaare Zedek Medical Center at 1 site in Israel.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

he study is a telephone questionnaire. The study will include 400 women, 100 in each group. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the prevalence of chronic and chronic back pain following PDPH accidental dural puncture during epidyral analgesia for delivery. 1. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 60 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
What is being tested?
Epidural Blood patch.
How many people
389 participants
Where
1 siteIsrael
Study dates
1 May 2019to 11 Aug 2020
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 60 years
  • Women only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Study population: Women who gave birth at Shaare Zedek Medical Center are a tertiary hospital with more than 16,000 births a year. Fifty-five percent of women give birth with epidural anesthesia.

Who may be able to join

  • Parturient who underwent epidural anesthesia during which an unintentional dural punctur occurred.
  • Parturient who develop a postdural puncture headache.
  • Parturient who gave informed consent to participation in the study.

Who cannot join

  • Parturient without a clear dural hole during operation.
  • Parturient who have chronic headaches or migraines.
  • Parturient who have chronic back pain.
  • Parturient who did not give informed consent.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Israel1 site
  • Shaare Zedek Meedical Center

    Jerusalem

Other trials in Israel

About this study

Official title: Chronic Headache and Chronic Backache Following Unintentional Dural Puncture at Delivery Room

he study is a telephone questionnaire. The study will include 400 women, 100 in each group.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the prevalence of chronic and chronic back pain following PDPH accidental dural puncture during epidyral analgesia for delivery.

  1. Parturients who gave birth to a normal birth and did not receive epidural anesthesia.
  2. Parturients who gave birth to a normal birth with epidural anesthesia without an unintentional dural puncture.
  3. Parturients who gave birth to a normal birth with epidural anesthesia and had an unintentional dural puncture, these women were treated conservatively.
  4. Parturients who had a normal birth with epidural anesthesia and had an unintentional dural puncture and were treated with a blood patch following PDPH.
Read the detailed description

Epidural anesthesia for pain relief during childbirth is performed in about 70% of the parturients in Shaare Zedek Medical Center. The most common complication of epidural analgesia is an unintentional dural puncture occurring in 0.4% -6% of births. Puncture causes acute headache in 70% -80% of cases. The standard treatment is the first stage of conservative treatment of painkillers and caffeine and in the absence of improvement of perform epidural blood patch 24-48 hours after the dural puncture was performed.

There is no widespread support for the literature that a dural puncture with a large diameter needle is a risk factor for the development of chronic headache. For this purpose, we are interested in conducting a study to examine the prevalence of chronic headache and back pain in parturients who underwent epidural anesthesia with a dural puncture to confront parturients who underwent epidural anesthesia without puncturing the dura membrane.

We know that in the years 2017-208 there were about 100 women in the hospital who had a blood patch and a similar number of women who had PDPH and were treated conservatively. From the medical records, we will randomize another 200 mothers, of which 100 were born naturally without epidural anesthesia and another 100 who gave birth to a normal birth with epidural anesthesia without dural puncture.

The study will be conducted using a telephone questionnaire. The telephone questionnaire will be taken at least six months after the epidural anesthesia check if the symptoms are chronic in nature.

Telephone questionnaire carried out four groups of mothers:

  1. Parturients who gave birth to a normal birth and did not receive epidural anesthesia.
  2. Parturients who gave birth to a normal birth with epidural anesthesia without an unintentional dural puncture.
  3. Parturients who gave birth to a normal birth with epidural anesthesia and had an unintentional dural puncture, these women were treated conservatively.
  4. Parturients who had a normal birth with epidural anesthesia and had an unintentional dural puncture and were treated with a blood patch following PDPH.

The questionnaire will be performed after receiving informed consent from the patient. Each group will have 100 women.

The questionnaire (attached as an appendix) will examine the prevalence of chronic headache and chronic back pain in these women. Our hypothesis is that in women with PDPH the incidence of chronic headache will be higher.

The statistical comparison between the groups will examine demographic characteristics and characteristics related to frequency of pain, intensity, restriction of daily activity and ways to relieve pain.

Comparisons between the groups for continuous variables will be done with the student t-test and data are presented as mean (standard deviation (SD)), for nonparametric tests with Mann-Whitney test and data are presented as median (interquartile range) ) [range] and for categorical values with Chi-square test and data are presented as number (percentage). A p-values <0.01 will be considered significant due to multiple comparisons. A multivariable regression analysis will be performed to evaluate factors (PDPH, epidural blood patch (EBP), chronic headache, chronic backache) associated with PPD.

Being tested
Epidural Blood patch.
Keywords
PDPH - Post Dural Puncture Headache, chronic headache, chronic backache
Medical subject headings
Post-Dural Puncture Headache, Headache Disorders

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Epidural Blood patch.Other

    An epidural blood patch is a surgical procedure that uses autologous blood in order to close one or many holes in the dura mater of the spinal cord, usually as a result of a previous lumbar puncture. A small amount of the patient's blood is injected into the epidural space near the site of the original puncture; the resulting blood clot then "patches" the meningeal leak. An epidural needle is inserted into the epidural space at the site of the cerebrospinal fluid leak and blood is injected. The clotting factors of the blood close the hole in the dura.

Study groups in NCT03908424
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
CONTROLParturients who gave birth to a normal birth and did not receive epidural anesthesia.
Normal EpiduralParturients who gave birth to a normal birth with epidural anesthesia without an unintentional dural puncture.
PDPH conservative treatmentParturients who gave birth to a normal birth with epidural anesthesia and had an unintentional dural puncture, these women were treated conservatively.
PDPH treated with Blood Patch. Parturients who had a normal birth with epidural anesthesia and had an unintentional dural puncture and were treated with a blood patch following PDPH.
Receives: Other: Epidural Blood patch.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Chronic Headache

    Chronic headache development after PDPH, comparison between different groups. The diagnosis of chronic headache will be done using a questionnaire (attached as an appendix) including the Chronic Pain Grade Questionnaire (Smith et al). The main questions in the questionnaire are the incidence of headache, the severity of the headache, the duration of the problem. Disability Index is also determined by the questions about limiting pain in daily activities.

    Measured: At least six months after birth.

  2. chronic Backache

    Chronic backache development after PDPH, comparison between different groups. The diagnosis of chronic back pain will be done using a questionnaire (attached as an appendix) including the Low Back Pain Rating Scale (Manniche et al.). The main questions in the questionnaire are the incidence of back pain, severity of back pain, duration of the problem. Disability Index is also determined by the questions about limiting pain in daily activities.

    Measured: At least six months after birth.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted9 Apr 2019
  2. Study start1 May 2019
  3. Primary completion11 Aug 2020
  4. Study completion11 Aug 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
389 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03908424
Sponsor's protocol ID
0335-18-SZMC
Status last verified
Aug 2020
First submitted
4 Apr 2019
Last updated
14 Aug 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Publications

  • Loubert C, Hinova A, Fernando R. Update on modern neuraxial analgesia in labour: a review of the literature of the last 5 years. Anaesthesia. 2011 Mar;66(3):191-212. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2010.06616.x.

    PubMed 21320088
  • Paech M, Banks S, Gurrin L. An audit of accidental dural puncture during epidural insertion of a Tuohy needle in obstetric patients. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2001 Jul;10(3):162-7. doi: 10.1054/ijoa.2000.0825.

    PubMed 15321604
  • Berger CW, Crosby ET, Grodecki W. North American survey of the management of dural puncture occurring during labour epidural analgesia. Can J Anaesth. 1998 Feb;45(2):110-4. doi: 10.1007/BF03013247.

    PubMed 9512843
  • MacArthur C, Lewis M, Knox EG. Accidental dural puncture in obstetric patients and long term symptoms. BMJ. 1993 Apr 3;306(6882):883-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.306.6882.883.

    PubMed 8490410
  • Smith BH, Penny KI, Purves AM, Munro C, Wilson B, Grimshaw J, Chambers WA, Smith WC. The Chronic Pain Grade questionnaire: validation and reliability in postal research. Pain. 1997 Jun;71(2):141-7. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3959(97)03347-2.

    PubMed 9211475

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Parturient Who Underwent Epidural Anesthesia During Which an Unintentional Dural Punctur Occurred and Parturient Who Develop a Postdural Puncture Headache, run by Shaare Zedek Medical Center at 1 site in Israel.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Aug 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Israel. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Chronic Headache (time frame: At least six months after birth.). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03908424, which also lists 5 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Aug 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in