PainPhase 4NCT03909607
Nebulized Sub-dissociative Dose Ketamine for Treating Pain
A Phase 4 study testing Ketamine 0.75 mg/kg, Ketamine 1.0 mg/kg and Ketamine 1.5 mg/kg in people with Pain, run by Antonios Likourezos at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The investigators previous research study comparing the efficacy of intravenous ketamine to morphine showed ketamine to provide equivalent relief of moderate to severe acute pain in emergency department patients. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 120 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Pain
- What is being tested?
- Ketamine 0.75 mg/kg, Ketamine 1.0 mg/kg and Ketamine 1.5 mg/kg
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 120 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 16 Apr 2019to 30 Jun 2021
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 120 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients age 18 and older
- acute and chronic abdominal, flank, back, musculoskeletal pain, and traumatic pain as well as cancer pain
- initial pain score of 5 or more on a standard 11- point (0 to 10) numeric rating scale.
Who cannot join
- altered mental status,
- allergy to ketamine,
- weight greater than 150 kg,
- unstable vital signs (systolic blood pressure <90 or>180 mm Hg,
- pulse rate <50 or >150 beats/min,
- respiration rate <10 or >30 breaths/min)
Show all 10Show fewer
- alcohol or drug abuse
- inability to provide consent
- psychiatric illness (schizophrenia),
- recent (4 hours before) opioid use.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Comparison of Nebulized Sub-dissociative Dose Ketamine at Three Different Dosing Regimens for Treating Acute and Chronic Painful Conditions in the ED: A Prospective, Randomized Trial
The investigators previous research study comparing the efficacy of intravenous ketamine to morphine showed ketamine to provide equivalent relief of moderate to severe acute pain in emergency department patients. A second study by the investigators showed that increasing the time of administration of the ketamine, from a push injection to a drip infusion, will minimize the adverse effects experienced by recipients of ketamine.
The investigators now aim to see if nebulized subdissociative-dose ketamine administered as a single agent in a dose of 1.5 mg/kg via Breath-Actuated Nebulizers (BAN) over 5-15 minutes will provide a better pain relief in comparison to 1 mg/kg and 0.75 mg/kg doses or if the lower doses are equally as effective.
Read the detailed description
STUDY DESIGN
Subjects: Patients 18 years of age and older presenting to the ED with acute and chronic painful conditions such as traumatic and non-traumatic abdominal, flank, back, or musculoskeletal pain as well as exacerbation of chronic abdominal, musculoskeletal and neuropathic pain with a score of 5 or more on a standard 11- point (0 to 10) numeric rating scale and requiring sub-dissociative dose ketamine analgesia, as determined by the treating attending physician. Patients' screening and enrollment will be performed by study investigators and research assistants. All patients will be enrolled at various times of the day when study investigators will be available for patient enrollment and an ED pharmacist will be available for medication preparation
Eligibility Criteria: Patients 18 years of age and older presenting to the ED with acute and chronic painful conditions such as traumatic and non-traumatic abdominal, flank, back, or musculoskeletal pain as well as exacerbation of chronic abdominal, musculoskeletal and neuropathic pain with a score of 5 or more on a standard 11- point (0 to 10) numeric rating scale.
Exclusion Criteria: Altered mental status, allergy to ketamine, pregnant patients, weight greater than 150 kg, unstable vital signs (systolic blood pressure <90 or>180 mm Hg, pulse rate <50 or >150 beats/min, and respiration rate <10 or >30 breaths/min), inability to provide consent, and past medical history of alcohol or drug abuse, or schizophrenia.
Design: This is a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial comparing analgesic efficacy and safety of nebulized SDK administered at three different doses to patients presenting to the ED of Maimonides Medical Center with acute and chronic painful conditions. Upon meeting the eligibility criteria, patients will be randomized into one of three study arms based on the dosing of the SDK: 0.75 mg/kg, 1 mg/kg, and 1.5 mg/kg.
Data Collection Procedures: Each patient will be approached by a study investigator for acquisition of written informed consent and Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act authorization after being evaluated by the treating emergency physician and determined to meet study eligibility criteria. When English will not be the participant's primary language, a staff interpreter or licensed telephone interpreter would be used. Baseline pain score will be determined with an 11-point numeric rating scale (0 to 10), described to the patient as "no pain" being 0 and "the worst pain imaginable" being 10. A study investigator will record the patient's body weight and baseline vital signs. The on-duty ED pharmacist will prepare a breath-actuated nebulizer with doses of 0.75 mg/kg, 1 mg/kg, and 1.5 mg/kg according to the predetermined randomization list, which will be created in SPSS (version 24; IBM Corp, Armonk, NY) with block randomization of every 10 participants. The medication will be delivered to the treating nurse in a blinded fashion and will be administered via breath-initiated nebulization with a minimum time of 5 min and maximum time of 15 min up to three doses.
Study investigators will record pain scores, vital signs, and adverse effects at 15, 30, 60, 90, and 120 minutes. If patients reported a pain numeric rating scale score of 5 or greater and requested additional pain relief, a second (equivalent to the first dose) of SDK via BAN will be administered to the patient in a blinded fashion. In situations when nebulized SDK will fail to achieve acceptable (by patient) pain relief or patient will refuse to continue nebulized SDK treatment, morphine at 0.1 mg/kg will be administered as a rescue analgesic.
All data will be recorded on data collection sheets, including patients' sex, demographics, medical history, and vital signs and entered into SPSS (version 24.0; IBM Corp) by the research manager. Development of the randomization list, confirmation of written consent acquisition for all participants, and statistical analyses will be conducted by the research manager and statistician, who would work independent of any data collection.
Patients will be closely monitored for any change in vital sings and for adverse effects during the entire study period (up to 2 h) by study investigators. Common adverse effects that are associated with sub-dissociative dose ketamine are felling of unreality, dizziness, nausea, vomiting, and sedation.
Data Analysis: Data analyses will include frequency distributions, paired t-test to assess a difference in pain scores within each group, and independent-sample t-test to assess differences in pain scores between the 3 groups at the various intervals.
Mixed-model linear regression will be used to compare changes in pain numeric rating scale across time points. This will compensate for participants lost to follow-up and allow all patients' data to be analyzed on an intention-to-treat principle.
For categorical outcomes (eg, complete resolution of pain), a X2 or Fisher's exact test will be used to compare outcomes at 30 minutes. Percentage differences and 95% confidence intervals between the treatment groups will be calculated for all time points with P<.05 to denote statistical significance. Based on the validation of a verbally administered rating scale of acute pain in the ED and the comparison of verbal and visual pain scales, we will use a primary outcome consisting of a minimal clinically meaningful difference of 1.3 between three groups at the 30-minute pain assessment.28,29
Sample Size: Assuming an SD of 3.0, a power analysis determined that a repeated-measures ANOVA with a sample size of 34 patients per group ( 102 total) will provide at least 80% power to detect a difference of at least 1.3 at 30 minutes (as well as at any other interval post-baseline), with an alpha=.05. To account for possible missing data the total sample size will be 120 patients (40 per group).A pre-planned interim data analysis will occur upon reaching a total of total of 60 patients ( 20) patients per group.
Expected Outcomes: The primary outcome will include a comparative reduction of pain scores on numeric rating pain scale (NRS) between recipients of nebulized SDK at three different doses at 30 minutes post-analgesic administration. The secondary outcomes will include a need for second or third dose, a need for rescue analgesia at either 30 or 60 minutes and adverse events in each group. With respect to unique adverse effects of SDK, we will use Side Effect Rating Scale for Dissociative Anesthetics (SERSDA) and Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale (RASS) (ref) SERSDA Scale includes fatigue, dizziness, nausea, headache, feeling of unreality, changes in hearing, mood change, general discomfort, and hallucinations with severity of each graded by patients on a five-point scale, with "0" representing the absence of any adverse effects and "4" representing a severely bothersome side effect. RASS evaluates the severity of agitation and/or sedation in accordance to the nine-point scale with scores ranging from "-4" (deeply sedated) to "0" (alert and calm) to "+4" (combative).
- Conditions
- Pain
- Being tested
- Ketamine 0.75 mg/kg, Ketamine 1.0 mg/kg, Ketamine 1.5 mg/kg
- Medical subject headings
- Pain
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Ketamine 0.75 mg/kgDrug
Patients with moderate to severe pain will receive Ketamine at a dose of 0.75mg/kg
Ketamine 1.0 mg/kgDrug
Patients with moderate to severe pain will receive Ketamine at a dose of 1.0 mg/kg
Ketamine 1.5 mg/kgDrug
Patients with moderate to severe pain will receive Ketamine at a dose of 1.5 mg/kg
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| SDK 0.75 mg/kg | Active comparator | The patients will receive sub-dissociative ketamine at a dose of 0.75mg/k Receives: Drug: Ketamine 0.75 mg/kg |
| SDK 1.0 mg/kg | Active comparator | The patients will receive sub-dissociative ketamine at a dose of 1.0mg/k Receives: Drug: Ketamine 1.0 mg/kg |
| SDK 1.5 mg/kg | Active comparator | The patients will receive sub-dissociative ketamine at a dose of 1.5mg/k Receives: Drug: Ketamine 1.5 mg/kg |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in Pain Scores From Baseline to 30 Minutes
Patients will be assessed via an 11 point Likert numeric rating scale at time medication is given (baseline) and 30 minutes later. The difference in pain scores will be assessed between the 3 groups. The numeric rating scale range is from 0 to 10 with 0 being no pain and 10 being very severe pain.
Measured: 30 minutes
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 Apr 2019
- Study start16 Apr 2019
- Primary completion30 Oct 2020
- Study completion30 Jun 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 120 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Antonios Likourezos
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Antonios Likourezos, Maimonides Medical Center
- Investigators
- Sergey Motov, MD, Principal investigator, Maimonides Medical Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03909607
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2018-11-12
- Status last verified
- Apr 2022
- First submitted
- 4 Apr 2019
- Last updated
- 15 Jun 2022
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Jun 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparison of Nebulized Sub-dissociative Dose Ketamine at Three Different Dosing Regimens for Treating Acute and Chronic Painful Conditions in the ED: A Prospective, Randomized Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03909607
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2018-11-12
- Conditions
- Pain
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 120 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Antonios LikourezosUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 16 Apr 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Oct 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Jun 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 10 Apr 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 3 May 2022
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The investigators previous research study comparing the efficacy of intravenous ketamine to morphine showed ketamine to provide equivalent relief of moderate to severe acute pain in emergency department patients. A second study by the investigators showed that increasing the time of administration of the ketamine, from a push injection to a drip infusion, will minimize the adverse effects experienced by recipients of ketamine.
The investigators now aim to see if nebulized subdissociative-dose ketamine administered as a single agent in a dose of 1.5 mg/kg via Breath-Actuated Nebulizers (BAN) over 5-15 minutes will provide a better pain relief in comparison to 1 mg/kg and 0.75 mg/kg doses or if the lower doses are equally as effective.
Detailed description
STUDY DESIGN
Subjects: Patients 18 years of age and older presenting to the ED with acute and chronic painful conditions such as traumatic and non-traumatic abdominal, flank, back, or musculoskeletal pain as well as exacerbation of chronic abdominal, musculoskeletal and neuropathic pain with a score of 5 or more on a standard 11- point (0 to 10) numeric rating scale and requiring sub-dissociative dose ketamine analgesia, as determined by the treating attending physician. Patients' screening and enrollment will be performed by study investigators and research assistants. All patients will be enrolled at various times of the day when study investigators will be available for patient enrollment and an ED pharmacist will be available for medication preparation
Eligibility Criteria: Patients 18 years of age and older presenting to the ED with acute and chronic painful conditions such as traumatic and non-traumatic abdominal, flank, back, or musculoskeletal pain as well as exacerbation of chronic abdominal, musculoskeletal and neuropathic pain with a score of 5 or more on a standard 11- point (0 to 10) numeric rating scale.
Exclusion Criteria: Altered mental status, allergy to ketamine, pregnant patients, weight greater than 150 kg, unstable vital signs (systolic blood pressure <90 or>180 mm Hg, pulse rate <50 or >150 beats/min, and respiration rate <10 or >30 breaths/min), inability to provide consent, and past medical history of alcohol or drug abuse, or schizophrenia.
Design: This is a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial comparing analgesic efficacy and safety of nebulized SDK administered at three different doses to patients presenting to the ED of Maimonides Medical Center with acute and chronic painful conditions. Upon meeting the eligibility criteria, patients will be randomized into one of three study arms based on the dosing of the SDK: 0.75 mg/kg, 1 mg/kg, and 1.5 mg/kg.
Data Collection Procedures: Each patient will be approached by a study investigator for acquisition of written informed consent and Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act authorization after being evaluated by the treating emergency physician and determined to meet study eligibility criteria. When English will not be the participant's primary language, a staff interpreter or licensed telephone interpreter would be used. Baseline pain score will be determined with an 11-point numeric rating scale (0 to 10), described to the patient as "no pain" being 0 and "the worst pain imaginable" being 10. A study investigator will record the patient's body weight and baseline vital signs. The on-duty ED pharmacist will prepare a breath-actuated nebulizer with doses of 0.75 mg/kg, 1 mg/kg, and 1.5 mg/kg according to the predetermined randomization list, which will be created in SPSS (version 24; IBM Corp, Armonk, NY) with block randomization of every 10 participants. The medication will be delivered to the treating nurse in a blinded fashion and will be administered via breath-initiated nebulization with a minimum time of 5 min and maximum time of 15 min up to three doses.
Study investigators will record pain scores, vital signs, and adverse effects at 15, 30, 60, 90, and 120 minutes. If patients reported a pain numeric rating scale score of 5 or greater and requested additional pain relief, a second (equivalent to the first dose) of SDK via BAN will be administered to the patient in a blinded fashion. In situations when nebulized SDK will fail to achieve acceptable (by patient) pain relief or patient will refuse to continue nebulized SDK treatment, morphine at 0.1 mg/kg will be administered as a rescue analgesic.
All data will be recorded on data collection sheets, including patients' sex, demographics, medical history, and vital signs and entered into SPSS (version 24.0; IBM Corp) by the research manager. Development of the randomization list, confirmation of written consent acquisition for all participants, and statistical analyses will be conducted by the research manager and statistician, who would work independent of any data collection.
Patients will be closely monitored for any change in vital sings and for adverse effects during the entire study period (up to 2 h) by study investigators. Common adverse effects that are associated with sub-dissociative dose ketamine are felling of unreality, dizziness, nausea, vomiting, and sedation.
Data Analysis: Data analyses will include frequency distributions, paired t-test to assess a difference in pain scores within each group, and independent-sample t-test to assess differences in pain scores between the 3 groups at the various intervals.
Mixed-model linear regression will be used to compare changes in pain numeric rating scale across time points. This will compensate for participants lost to follow-up and allow all patients' data to be analyzed on an intention-to-treat principle.
For categorical outcomes (eg, complete resolution of pain), a X2 or Fisher's exact test will be used to compare outcomes at 30 minutes. Percentage differences and 95% confidence intervals between the treatment groups will be calculated for all time points with P<.05 to denote statistical significance. Based on the validation of a verbally administered rating scale of acute pain in the ED and the comparison of verbal and visual pain scales, we will use a primary outcome consisting of a minimal clinically meaningful difference of 1.3 between three groups at the 30-minute pain assessment.28,29
Sample Size: Assuming an SD of 3.0, a power analysis determined that a repeated-measures ANOVA with a sample size of 34 patients per group ( 102 total) will provide at least 80% power to detect a difference of at least 1.3 at 30 minutes (as well as at any other interval post-baseline), with an alpha=.05. To account for possible missing data the total sample size will be 120 patients (40 per group).A pre-planned interim data analysis will occur upon reaching a total of total of 60 patients ( 20) patients per group.
Expected Outcomes: The primary outcome will include a comparative reduction of pain scores on numeric rating pain scale (NRS) between recipients of nebulized SDK at three different doses at 30 minutes post-analgesic administration. The secondary outcomes will include a need for second or third dose, a need for rescue analgesia at either 30 or 60 minutes and adverse events in each group. With respect to unique adverse effects of SDK, we will use Side Effect Rating Scale for Dissociative Anesthetics (SERSDA) and Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale (RASS) (ref) SERSDA Scale includes fatigue, dizziness, nausea, headache, feeling of unreality, changes in hearing, mood change, general discomfort, and hallucinations with severity of each graded by patients on a five-point scale, with "0" representing the absence of any adverse effects and "4" representing a severely bothersome side effect. RASS evaluates the severity of agitation and/or sedation in accordance to the nine-point scale with scores ranging from "-4" (deeply sedated) to "0" (alert and calm) to "+4" (combative).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| SDK 0.75 mg/kg | Active comparator | Drug: Ketamine 0.75 mg/kgThe patients will receive sub-dissociative ketamine at a dose of 0.75mg/k |
| SDK 1.0 mg/kg | Active comparator | Drug: Ketamine 1.0 mg/kgThe patients will receive sub-dissociative ketamine at a dose of 1.0mg/k |
| SDK 1.5 mg/kg | Active comparator | Drug: Ketamine 1.5 mg/kgThe patients will receive sub-dissociative ketamine at a dose of 1.5mg/k |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 120 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patients age 18 and older
- acute and chronic abdominal, flank, back, musculoskeletal pain, and traumatic pain as well as cancer pain
- initial pain score of 5 or more on a standard 11- point (0 to 10) numeric rating scale.
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- altered mental status,
- allergy to ketamine,
- weight greater than 150 kg,
- unstable vital signs (systolic blood pressure <90 or>180 mm Hg,
- pulse rate <50 or >150 beats/min,
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Ketamine 0.75 mg/kgPatients with moderate to severe pain will receive Ketamine at a dose of 0.75mg/kg | Drug | SDK 0.75 mg/kg |
| Ketamine 1.0 mg/kgPatients with moderate to severe pain will receive Ketamine at a dose of 1.0 mg/kg | Drug | SDK 1.0 mg/kg |
| Ketamine 1.5 mg/kgPatients with moderate to severe pain will receive Ketamine at a dose of 1.5 mg/kg | Drug | SDK 1.5 mg/kg |
Primary outcome
Change in Pain Scores From Baseline to 30 Minutes
Time frame: 30 minutes
Patients will be assessed via an 11 point Likert numeric rating scale at time medication is given (baseline) and 30 minutes later. The difference in pain scores will be assessed between the 3 groups. The numeric rating scale range is from 0 to 10 with 0 being no pain and 10 being very severe pain.
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Jun 2022.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Pain
Not yet recruiting
Digital Use, 24-Hour Movement Behaviors, and Myofascial Release in University Students With Neck Pain
Forward Head Posture, Chronic Nonspecific Neck Pain
Recruiting
Effects of Virtual Reality Exergames Versus Spinal Manipulation in Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain
Chronic Nonspecific Low-back Pain, CNSLBP
Recruiting
Dietary Intervention for Migraine Relief
Migraine
RecruitingPhase 4
Anrikefon-based Patient-controlled Intravenous Analgesia Following Laparoscopic Surgery
Laparoscopic Surgery, Visceral Pain, Postoperative
Not yet recruiting
Ultrasound-Guided Radiofrequency Ablation for Focal Adenomyosis
Adenomyosis, Adenomyoma of Uterus
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Sergey Motov, MD principal investigator
Maimonides Medical Center
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Ketamine 0.75 mg/kg, Ketamine 1.0 mg/kg and Ketamine 1.5 mg/kg in people with Pain, run by Antonios Likourezos at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Jun 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 3 May 2022). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in Pain Scores From Baseline to 30 Minutes (time frame: 30 minutes). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Jun 2022.