Breast CancerNCT03910595
Efficacy Study of Mepitel Film the Prophylaxis of Radiation-Induced Skin Reactions in Breast Cancer Patients
A study testing Mepitel Film in people with Breast Cancer and Radiation Dermatitis, run by Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
In patients undergoing adjuvant radiotherapy for breast cancer, radiation-induced skin toxicities are a common occurrence and adversely impact patients' quality of life (QOL). In the last decade, there have been no significant advances in preventing or treating radiation-induced skin toxicities. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Breast Cancer, Radiation Dermatitis
- What is being tested?
- Mepitel Film
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 30 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- 14 Mar 2019to 8 Sep 2020
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Informed consent
- Patient will receive adjuvant breast or chest wall radiation
- Post-lumpectomy patients with band size of at least 36 inches or cup size of D or larger will be part of the large breast cohort
- Post-lumpectomy patients that do not meet this size requirement will be part of the small or medium sized breast cohort
- Post-mastectomy patients are part of the chest wall radiation cohort
- Can communicate in English or be aided by a hospital translator
Who cannot join
- Patient had previous radiation therapy to the treatment area
- Patient had breast reconstruction
- Patient has a Karnofsky Performance Status score <70
- Patient will have radiation treatment in prone or reverse decubitus positions
- Patient will receive partial breast external beam radiation or brachytherapy
- Patient will receive radiation to the supraclavicular region
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Canada1 site
Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
Toronto, Ontario, M4N3M5
About this study
Official title: An Efficacy Study of Mepitel Film in the Prophylaxis of Radiation-Induced Skin Reactions in Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Adjuvant Radiotherapy
In patients undergoing adjuvant radiotherapy for breast cancer, radiation-induced skin toxicities are a common occurrence and adversely impact patients' quality of life (QOL). In the last decade, there have been no significant advances in preventing or treating radiation-induced skin toxicities. Recently, a phase III randomized trial by Herst et al. (n=78) in New Zealand showed that the prophylactic use of Mepitel Film reduced skin reaction severity by 92% compared to skin treated only with aqueous cream. Mepitel film has not been widely adopted in North America. To validate the efficacy of the film and guide the development of a larger multi-centre phase II study, a pilot study testing the efficacy of the film is proposed. In the study, 30 patients will have the film applied on their breast for the duration of radiation treatment and their skin reactions will be assessed throughout the treatment and after the treatment. The investigators hypothesize that the severity and incidence rates of skin reactions for patients using Mepitel film will be lower when compared to real world data from our centre, and that cosmetic outcomes will be improved with the film.
Read the detailed description
In patients undergoing adjuvant radiotherapy for breast cancer, radiation-induced skin toxicities are a common occurrence and adversely impact patients' quality of life (QOL). Patients with large breasts or patients receiving chest wall radiation may be more likely to have worse skin reactions following radiation. In the last decade, there have been no significant advances in preventing or treating radiation-induced skin toxicities. Recently, a phase III randomized trial by Herst et al. (n=78) in New Zealand showed that the prophylactic use of Mepitel Film prevented moist desquamation (26% vs. 0%, p < 0.001) and reduced skin reaction severity by 92% (p < 0.001) compared to skin treated only with aqueous cream. Another study by Moller et al. (n=101) in Denmark reported a non-significant improvement in observer-rated radiation dermatitis with the film (p=0.1) compared to cream, and significant improvements in several patient-reported outcomes. Moreover, patients with breast cancer complain of hyperpigmentation in the radiated area during and after radiation.
Mepitel Film has not been widely adopted in North American clinical practice. To further study and validate the efficacy of Mepitel Film in preventing acute skin reactions caused by breast radiation and elucidate its efficacy in preventing poor cosmetic outcomes, a phase II efficacy study of three patient populations will be conducted:
- Patients with large breasts
- Patients with small or medium sized breasts
- Patients with chest wall radiation
The results of the phase II efficacy study can guide the development of a subsequent multi-centre phase II and III trials to further validate the use of Mepitel film and increase its adoption rate.
The primary objective is to examine the efficacy of Mepitel film in the prophylaxis of radiation-induced skin reactions. Secondary objectives include an evaluation of patient-reported and healthcare professional (HCP)-reported skin toxicities including moist desquamation with the use of Mepitel film.
Radiation oncologists will first introduce the study to their patients in their breast clinic, showing a sample of the product and also pictures from the trial conducted in New Zealand. Patients if interested may be provided a patient information sheet to review at home. Then, patients will be approached by a CRA at their radiation planning appointment to review all information and obtain informed consent.
All patients will receive Mepitel film for the duration of treatment. Radiation treatment will be delivered as prescribed by the treating radiation oncologist and may include a variety of techniques and beam modifiers.
Trained clinical research assistants (CRA) or the radiation review nurse will apply the Mepitel film for patients prior to their first radiation treatment at a designated clinic room and will check daily prior to radiation that the breast/chest wall has not been distorted by the film. If the film needs to be readjusted, the CRAs or nurses will remove peeling sections of film and reapply where needed. The film will be removed two weeks post radiation treatment.
Patients will complete evaluations once a week at their regular review clinic visit and will be assessed by an HCP or CRA. At the last treatment or last review appointment, a photo of the patient's breasts/chest wall will be taken, and they will be asked to complete an assessment. An HCP will also conduct an assessment.
After completion of radiation, patients will be called at week 1 and weeks 3-6 to assess endpoints. Patients will be asked to return for a 2-week, 3-month, and 6-month follow-up assessment where photos of their breasts/chest wall will be taken, and they will complete their personal assessments. The film will be removed at the 2-week follow-up appointment. The 3-month follow-up assessment will occur at the same time as their regular clinic follow-up with their radiation oncologist. At the 3-month and 6-month follow-up assessment, an HCP will also an assessment.
- Conditions
- Breast Cancer, Radiation Dermatitis
- Being tested
- Mepitel Film
- Keywords
- Barrier Film, Mepitel, Quality of Life, Radiation Dermatitis, Skin toxicity
- Medical subject headings
- Breast Neoplasms, Radiodermatitis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Mepitel FilmOther
Mepitel film is a barrier film that may help in reducing radiation dermatitis by limiting friction.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Mepitel Film Arm | Experimental | This is a single arm trial where all patients will receive the intervention of Mepitel Film. Receives: Other: Mepitel Film |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Observable differences between treated and non-treated breasts/chest wall
Determined by a cosmetic dermatologist from photographs of the treated and non-treated breast/chest wall.
Measured: Within 3 months following radiation
Secondary outcomes (12)
Patient reports of acute skin toxicity
Measured by the Skin Symptom Assessment (SSA); subscales for itchiness, pain/soreness, blistering/peeling, redness, discolouration/darkness, swelling, and trouble fitting brassieres graded as "not at all", "a little", "quite a bit", or "very much"
Measured: Within 3 months following radiotherapy
Patient reports of late skin toxicity
Measured by the SSA; subscales for itchiness, pain/soreness, blistering/peeling, redness, discolouration/darkness, swelling, and trouble fitting brassieres graded as "not at all", "a little", "quite a bit", or "very much"
Measured: 6 months following radiotherapy
Clinician reports of acute skin toxicity
Measured by the SSA; subscales for itchiness, pain/soreness, blistering/peeling, redness, discolouration/darkness, swelling, and trouble fitting brassieres graded as "not at all", "a little", "quite a bit", or "very much"
Measured: Within 3 months following radiotherapy
Clinician reports of late skin toxicity
Measured by the SSA; subscales for itchiness, pain/soreness, blistering/peeling, redness, discolouration/darkness, swelling, and trouble fitting brassieres graded as "not at all", "a little", "quite a bit", or "very much"
Measured: 6 months following radiotherapy
Clinician grading of acute skin toxicity
Measured by the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE); graded on a scale from 0 (best) to 4 (worst)
Measured: Within 3 months following radiotherapy
Clinician grading of late skin toxicity
Measured by the NCI CTCAE; graded on a scale from 0 (best) to 4 (worst)
Measured: 6 months following radiotherapy
Degree of acute skin toxicity and interference with daily functioning
Measured by the Radiation Induced Skin Reaction Assessment System (RISRAS); researcher subscales for erythema and dry desquamation rated from 0 (best) to 4 (worst); researcher subscale for moist desquamation rated from 0 (best) to 6 (worst); researcher subscale for necrosis rated from 0 (best) to 10 (worst); patient subscales for tenderness/discomfort/pain, itchiness, burning sensation, and interference with daily activities rated from 0 (best) to 3 (worst).
Measured: Within 3 months following radiotherapy
Degree of late skin toxicity and interference with daily functioning
Measured by the RISRAS; researcher subscales for erythema and dry desquamation rated from 0 (best) to 4 (worst); researcher subscale for moist desquamation rated from 0 (best) to 6 (worst); researcher subscale for necrosis rated from 0 (best) to 10 (worst); patient subscales for tenderness/discomfort/pain, itchiness, burning sensation, and interference with daily activities rated from 0 (best) to 3 (worst).
Measured: 6 months following radiotherapy
Long-term changes in skin pigmentation
Measured by photographs of the treated and non-treated breast and graded by a cosmetic dermatologist
Measured: Changes from baseline to 6 months following radiotherapy
Acute changes in breast cosmesis
Measured by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Breast Cosmetic Rating System; subscales for breast size, breast shape, location of areola/nipple, shape of areola/nipple, tanning, pallor, breast edema, appearance of scar, and telangiectasia graded from 0 (best) to 3 (worst); overall grade assigned from 0 (best) to 2 (worst).
Measured: Within 3 months following radiotherapy
Late changes in breast cosmesis
Measured by the EORTC Breast Cosmetic Rating System; subscales for breast size, breast shape, location of areola/nipple, shape of areola/nipple, tanning, pallor, breast edema, appearance of scar, and telangiectasia graded from 0 (best) to 3 (worst); overall grade assigned from 0 (best) to 2 (worst).
Measured: 6 months following radiotherapy
Film Integrity Assessment
Evaluated daily prior to the patient's radiotherapy treatment
Measured: Until film is removed, 2 weeks following radiotherapy
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 Apr 2019
- Study start14 Mar 2019
- Primary completion28 Apr 2020
- Study completion8 Sep 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Breast CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Sunnybrook Health Sciences CentreThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Model description
- All patients will receive the Mepitel film intervention. This film will be given to patients in one of three patient populations: 1. Patients with large breasts 2. Patients with small or medium sized breasts 3. Patients with chest wall radiation
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Dr. Edward Chow, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
- Investigators
- Edward LW Chow, MBBS, Principal investigator, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03910595
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 294-2018
- Status last verified
- Oct 2020
- First submitted
- 24 Jan 2019
- Last updated
- 22 Oct 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 22 Oct 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- An Efficacy Study of Mepitel Film in the Prophylaxis of Radiation-Induced Skin Reactions in Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Adjuvant Radiotherapy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03910595
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 294-2018
- Conditions
- Breast Cancer, Radiation Dermatitis
- Keywords
- Barrier Film, Mepitel, Quality of Life, Radiation Dermatitis, Skin toxicity
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences CentreUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 14 Mar 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 28 Apr 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 8 Sep 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 10 Apr 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
In patients undergoing adjuvant radiotherapy for breast cancer, radiation-induced skin toxicities are a common occurrence and adversely impact patients' quality of life (QOL). In the last decade, there have been no significant advances in preventing or treating radiation-induced skin toxicities. Recently, a phase III randomized trial by Herst et al. (n=78) in New Zealand showed that the prophylactic use of Mepitel Film reduced skin reaction severity by 92% compared to skin treated only with aqueous cream. Mepitel film has not been widely adopted in North America. To validate the efficacy of the film and guide the development of a larger multi-centre phase II study, a pilot study testing the efficacy of the film is proposed. In the study, 30 patients will have the film applied on their breast for the duration of radiation treatment and their skin reactions will be assessed throughout the treatment and after the treatment. The investigators hypothesize that the severity and incidence rates of skin reactions for patients using Mepitel film will be lower when compared to real world data from our centre, and that cosmetic outcomes will be improved with the film.
Detailed description
In patients undergoing adjuvant radiotherapy for breast cancer, radiation-induced skin toxicities are a common occurrence and adversely impact patients' quality of life (QOL). Patients with large breasts or patients receiving chest wall radiation may be more likely to have worse skin reactions following radiation. In the last decade, there have been no significant advances in preventing or treating radiation-induced skin toxicities. Recently, a phase III randomized trial by Herst et al. (n=78) in New Zealand showed that the prophylactic use of Mepitel Film prevented moist desquamation (26% vs. 0%, p < 0.001) and reduced skin reaction severity by 92% (p < 0.001) compared to skin treated only with aqueous cream. Another study by Moller et al. (n=101) in Denmark reported a non-significant improvement in observer-rated radiation dermatitis with the film (p=0.1) compared to cream, and significant improvements in several patient-reported outcomes. Moreover, patients with breast cancer complain of hyperpigmentation in the radiated area during and after radiation.
Mepitel Film has not been widely adopted in North American clinical practice. To further study and validate the efficacy of Mepitel Film in preventing acute skin reactions caused by breast radiation and elucidate its efficacy in preventing poor cosmetic outcomes, a phase II efficacy study of three patient populations will be conducted:
- Patients with large breasts
- Patients with small or medium sized breasts
- Patients with chest wall radiation
The results of the phase II efficacy study can guide the development of a subsequent multi-centre phase II and III trials to further validate the use of Mepitel film and increase its adoption rate.
The primary objective is to examine the efficacy of Mepitel film in the prophylaxis of radiation-induced skin reactions. Secondary objectives include an evaluation of patient-reported and healthcare professional (HCP)-reported skin toxicities including moist desquamation with the use of Mepitel film.
Radiation oncologists will first introduce the study to their patients in their breast clinic, showing a sample of the product and also pictures from the trial conducted in New Zealand. Patients if interested may be provided a patient information sheet to review at home. Then, patients will be approached by a CRA at their radiation planning appointment to review all information and obtain informed consent.
All patients will receive Mepitel film for the duration of treatment. Radiation treatment will be delivered as prescribed by the treating radiation oncologist and may include a variety of techniques and beam modifiers.
Trained clinical research assistants (CRA) or the radiation review nurse will apply the Mepitel film for patients prior to their first radiation treatment at a designated clinic room and will check daily prior to radiation that the breast/chest wall has not been distorted by the film. If the film needs to be readjusted, the CRAs or nurses will remove peeling sections of film and reapply where needed. The film will be removed two weeks post radiation treatment.
Patients will complete evaluations once a week at their regular review clinic visit and will be assessed by an HCP or CRA. At the last treatment or last review appointment, a photo of the patient's breasts/chest wall will be taken, and they will be asked to complete an assessment. An HCP will also conduct an assessment.
After completion of radiation, patients will be called at week 1 and weeks 3-6 to assess endpoints. Patients will be asked to return for a 2-week, 3-month, and 6-month follow-up assessment where photos of their breasts/chest wall will be taken, and they will complete their personal assessments. The film will be removed at the 2-week follow-up appointment. The 3-month follow-up assessment will occur at the same time as their regular clinic follow-up with their radiation oncologist. At the 3-month and 6-month follow-up assessment, an HCP will also an assessment.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
- Model description
- All patients will receive the Mepitel film intervention. This film will be given to patients in one of three patient populations: 1. Patients with large breasts 2. Patients with small or medium sized breasts 3. Patients with chest wall radiation
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Mepitel Film Arm | Experimental | Other: Mepitel FilmThis is a single arm trial where all patients will receive the intervention of Mepitel Film. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Informed consent
- Patient will receive adjuvant breast or chest wall radiation
- Post-lumpectomy patients with band size of at least 36 inches or cup size of D or larger will be part of the large breast cohort
- Post-lumpectomy patients that do not meet this size requirement will be part of the small or medium sized breast cohort
- Post-mastectomy patients are part of the chest wall radiation cohort
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Patient had previous radiation therapy to the treatment area
- Patient had breast reconstruction
- Patient has a Karnofsky Performance Status score <70
- Patient will have radiation treatment in prone or reverse decubitus positions
- Patient will receive partial breast external beam radiation or brachytherapy
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Mepitel FilmMepitel film is a barrier film that may help in reducing radiation dermatitis by limiting friction. | Other | Mepitel Film Arm |
Primary outcome
Observable differences between treated and non-treated breasts/chest wall
Time frame: Within 3 months following radiation
Determined by a cosmetic dermatologist from photographs of the treated and non-treated breast/chest wall.
12 secondary outcomes
Patient reports of acute skin toxicity
Time frame: Within 3 months following radiotherapy
Patient reports of late skin toxicity
Time frame: 6 months following radiotherapy
Clinician reports of acute skin toxicity
Time frame: Within 3 months following radiotherapy
Clinician reports of late skin toxicity
Time frame: 6 months following radiotherapy
Clinician grading of acute skin toxicity
Time frame: Within 3 months following radiotherapy
Clinician grading of late skin toxicity
Time frame: 6 months following radiotherapy
Degree of acute skin toxicity and interference with daily functioning
Time frame: Within 3 months following radiotherapy
Degree of late skin toxicity and interference with daily functioning
Time frame: 6 months following radiotherapy
Long-term changes in skin pigmentation
Time frame: Changes from baseline to 6 months following radiotherapy
Acute changes in breast cosmesis
Time frame: Within 3 months following radiotherapy
Late changes in breast cosmesis
Time frame: 6 months following radiotherapy
Film Integrity Assessment
Time frame: Until film is removed, 2 weeks following radiotherapy
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 22 Oct 2020.
Related trials for Breast Cancer
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
RecruitingPhase 2
Gene Signatures to Guide HR+MBC Therapy in a Diverse Cohort
Invasive Mammary Carcinoma, Metastatic Breast Cancer
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Comparison of Reliability, Time Cost, and Participant Comfort of Lymphedema Assessments in Upper Extremity
Lymphedema, Upper Extremity Lymphedema
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Camrelizumab Plus Chemotherapy in Combination With or Without Famitinib as Neoadjuvant Therapy in Participants With Triple Negative Breast Cancer (BCTOP-T-N01)
TNBC - Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
RecruitingPhase 3
Testing Whether Hormone Therapy With Ribociclib is as Effective as Chemotherapy Followed by Hormone Therapy With Ribociclib for the Treatment of High Anatomic Stage Breast Cancer With Low Recurrence Risk, The RxFINE-Low Trial
Anatomic Stage II Breast Cancer AJCC v8, Anatomic Stage IIIA Breast Cancer AJCC v8
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Edward LW Chow, MBBS principal investigator
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Mepitel Film in people with Breast Cancer and Radiation Dermatitis, run by Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Oct 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Observable differences between treated and non-treated breasts/chest wall (time frame: Within 3 months following radiation). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Oct 2020.