Decompensated Cirrhosis of LiverPhase 2/3NCT03911037
GCSF Therapy in Decompensated Cirrhosis - A Double Blinded RCT
A Phase 2/3 study testing G-CSF in people with Decompensated Cirrhosis of Liver, run by Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh at 1 site in India.
Trial summary
Cirrhosis of liver is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Complications like ascites, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, variceal bleed, hepatic encephalopathy, hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) portend a poor prognosis and further decreases survival in these patients. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Decompensated Cirrhosis of Liver
- What is being tested?
- G-CSF
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 70 participants
- Where
- 1 siteIndia
- Study dates
- 4 May 2019to 30 Jun 2020
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Decompensated Cirrhosis of liver irrespective of etiology
Who cannot join
- Acute on chronic liver failure (fulfilling either APASL or CANONIC criteria of ACLF)
- Splenic diameter of more than 18 cm
- Concomitant HCC or other active malignancy
- Upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the previous 7 days
- Portal vein thrombosis
- Severe renal dysfunction as defined by creatnine > 1.5mg/dl
Show all 15Show fewer
- Severe cardiac dysfunction
- Uncontrolled diabetes (HbA1c ≥ 9) or diabetic retinopathy
- Acute infection or disseminate intravascular coagulation
- Active alcohol abuse in last 3 months
- Known hypersensitivity to G-CSF
- HIV co-infection
- Pregnancy
- Refusal to give informed consent
- Those opting for liver transplant
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
India1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research
Chandigarh, 160012
Virendra Singh, DM, 7087009338, virendrasingh100@hotmail.com
Aswath Venkitaraman, MD, 9597517036, av3280@gmail.com
About this study
Official title: Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor Therapy In Decompensated Cirrhosis Of Liver: A Double Blinded Single Centre Randomised Controlled Trial
Cirrhosis of liver is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Complications like ascites, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, variceal bleed, hepatic encephalopathy, hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) portend a poor prognosis and further decreases survival in these patients. The major causes of cirrhosis include excessive alcohol consumption, viral hepatitis and non- alcoholic fatty liver disease.
Currently the only definitive treatment option for cirrhosis is liver transplantation which is limited in its applicability due to donor shortage, exorbitant costs and lack of widespread availability. Moreover, it requires lifelong immunosuppression and has considerable long term side effects including chronic renal failure, post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease and cardiovascular complications.
Read more
The ability of stem cells to differentiate into multiple cellular lineages makes one speculate that stem cells can be used for tissue repair and regeneration when tissue-resident stem cells become overwhelmed. It has been shown that in response to acute or chronic liver damage, bone marrow derived stem cells can spontaneously populate the liver and differentiate into hepatic cells, thereby contributing to hepatic regeneration. Thus, apart from hepatocytes and intrahepatic stem cells, bone marrow derived stem cells also participate in the liver regeneration process.
Currently, there are two methods to mobilize stem cells from the bone marrow to the liver. One is administration of cytokines like granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) and the other is the isolation of stem cells from the marrow and their injection into the hepatic artery or portal vein after purification. The latter is probably more cumbersome and may be potentially risky due to the underlying coagulation abnormalities in cirrhotic patients. Improved liver histology and survival has been noted in patients with cirrhosis following mobilization of bone marrow stem cells by granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF).
Three recent studies have demonstrated G-CSF induced mobilization of bone marrow stem cells (CD34 cells) in peripheral blood and their subsequent increase in liver tissue and improved survival in patients with alcoholic hepatitis and ACLF. However, there is a paucity of data on whether G-CSF improves survival and prognosis in patients with decompensated cirrhosis.
Verma, Singh et al have shown in an open label trial that there was significantly better 12 month transplant free survival in ( GCSF+ Growth hormone + standard medical therapy group ) and ( G CSF + standard medical therapy group ) as compared to standard medical therapy group alone. CD 34+ cells at day 6 of therapy increased as compared to baseline. There was also a significant decrease of clinical scores, improvement in nutrition, better control of ascites, reduction in liver stiffness, lesser episodes of infection as well as improvement in QOL scores in the treatment groups having G CSF as compared to baseline.
In a recent study by Newsome et al, a multicentre, open label randomized phase 2 trial, patients were randomized to standard care, treatment with subcutaneous G CSF or treatment with G CSF for 5 days followed by leukaphersis and IV infusion of CD 133 positive haematopoietic stem cells. They did not find any difference in MELD score over time in all 3 treatment groups. Serious adverse effects were more common in the G CSF groups than in standard treatment group.
In a study by Kedarisetty CK et al. a significantly larger proportion of patients with decompensated cirrhosis given a combination of G-CSF \& Darbopoietin α survived for 12 months more than patients given only placebo ( 68% vs. 26.9%; P = 0.001 ). The combination therapy also reduced liver severity scores and sepsis to a greater extent than placebo.
In view of the conflicting results of the above studies and no studies on the use of multiple courses of GCSF in patients with decompensated cirrhosis in a double blind manner, the present study was undertaken to assess the safety and efficacy of G-CSF in patients with decompensated cirrhosis in the form of a double blinded RCT.
- Conditions
- Decompensated Cirrhosis of Liver
- Being tested
- G-CSF, Placebo
- Keywords
- Regenerative medicine
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
G-CSFDrug
G-CSF will be administered as prefilled syringes at a dosage of 5 μg/Kg subcutaneously every 12 hr for five consecutive days. Four such cycles will be administered at three monthly intervals.
PlaceboDrug
Placebo ( prefilled syringe) filled with normal saline subcutaneously every 12 hr will be administered for five consecutive days. Four such cycles at 3 monthly intervals will be administered.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Standard Medical Therapy + G CSF Therapy | Active comparator | Standard medical therapy will include nutritional support, rifaximin, lactulose, bowel wash, albumin, diuretics, multivitamins, antibiotics. fresh frozen plasma and packed red-cell transfusions (as required). G-CSF ( prefilled syringe) at the dosage of 5 μg/Kg subcutaneously every 12 hr will be administered for five consecutive days. Four such cycles at 3 monthly intervals will be administered. Receives: Drug: G-CSF |
| Standard Medical Therapy + Placebo | Placebo comparator | Standard medical therapy will include nutritional support, rifaximin, lactulose, bowel wash, albumin, diuretics, multivitamins, antibiotics. fresh frozen plasma and packed red-cell transfusions (as required).
Placebo ( prefilled syringe) filled with normal saline subcutaneously every 12 hr will be administered for five consecutive days. Four such cycles at 3 monthly intervals will be administered. Receives: Drug: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Overall Survival
Overall Survival at 1 year from the onset of therapy
Measured: One year
Secondary outcomes (9)
Hemopoietic stem cell mobilisation
Mobilisation of CD 34+ cells in peripheral blood
Measured: One Year
Clinical improvement in liver functions
Occurrence of decompensations namely ascites, hepatic encephalopathy and variceal bleed
Measured: One Year
Biochemical improvement in liver functions
Improvement in model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score. MELD score includes serum bilirubin, serum creatinine and international normalized ratio (INR). The score ranges from 6 to 40 with higher score indicating more severe liver disease.
Measured: One Year
Improvement in nutritional status
Nutritional status will be assessed by skeletal muscle index (SMI) measurement using CT scan measurements at L3 level
Measured: One Year
Improvement in quality of life
Quality of life will be assessed using SF-36V2 Health Survey questionnaire
Measured: One year
Depression
Improvement in Depression as assessed by Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). The questionnaire score ranges from 1 to 27 with 1 indicating minimal depression and 27 indicating severe depression.
Measured: One year
Demoralisation scale
Change in demoralisation scale will be noted at baseline and at the end of one year. The demoralisation scale is a questionnaire comprising of 24 items each being scored from 0 to 4. The total score ranges from 0 to 96 with higher score indicating more severe demoralisation.
Measured: One year
Immunological profile
Change in the immunological profile of patients. Immunological profile will be assessed using various interleukins (IL) including IL-6, IL-10, TNF-alpha, IL-17, IL-4, IL-13 and IFN-gamma which will be measured in pg/ml at baseline and at the end of one year.
Measured: One year
Safety of G-CSF as assessed by its adverse effects
Safety of G-CSF as assessed by its adverse effects
Measured: One year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 Apr 2019
- Study start4 May 2019
- Primary completion30 Jun 2020 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Jun 2020 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Decompensated Cirrhosis of LiverStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 70 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Society for the Study of Liver Diseases, Chandigarh ( India )
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Dr.Virendra Singh, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03911037
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- GCSF in DC
- Status last verified
- Jul 2019
- First submitted
- 6 Apr 2019
- Last updated
- 19 Jul 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Venkitaraman A, De A, Verma N, Kumari S, Leishangthem B, Sharma RR, Kalra N, Grover S, Singh V. Multiple cycles of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in decompensated cirrhosis: a double-blind RCT. Hepatol Int. 2022 Oct;16(5):1127-1136. doi: 10.1007/s12072-022-10314-x. Epub 2022 Mar 23.
PubMed 35322373
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Jul 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor Therapy In Decompensated Cirrhosis Of Liver: A Double Blinded Single Centre Randomised Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03911037
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- GCSF in DC
- Conditions
- Decompensated Cirrhosis of Liver
- Keywords
- Regenerative medicine
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 70 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, ChandigarhUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Society for the Study of Liver Diseases, Chandigarh ( India )
- Study start
- 4 May 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Jun 2020 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Jun 2020 (estimated)
- First posted
- 10 Apr 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Cirrhosis of liver is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Complications like ascites, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, variceal bleed, hepatic encephalopathy, hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) portend a poor prognosis and further decreases survival in these patients. The major causes of cirrhosis include excessive alcohol consumption, viral hepatitis and non- alcoholic fatty liver disease.
Currently the only definitive treatment option for cirrhosis is liver transplantation which is limited in its applicability due to donor shortage, exorbitant costs and lack of widespread availability. Moreover, it requires lifelong immunosuppression and has considerable long term side effects including chronic renal failure, post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease and cardiovascular complications.
The ability of stem cells to differentiate into multiple cellular lineages makes one speculate that stem cells can be used for tissue repair and regeneration when tissue-resident stem cells become overwhelmed. It has been shown that in response to acute or chronic liver damage, bone marrow derived stem cells can spontaneously populate the liver and differentiate into hepatic cells, thereby contributing to hepatic regeneration. Thus, apart from hepatocytes and intrahepatic stem cells, bone marrow derived stem cells also participate in the liver regeneration process.
Currently, there are two methods to mobilize stem cells from the bone marrow to the liver. One is administration of cytokines like granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) and the other is the isolation of stem cells from the marrow and their injection into the hepatic artery or portal vein after purification. The latter is probably more cumbersome and may be potentially risky due to the underlying coagulation abnormalities in cirrhotic patients. Improved liver histology and survival has been noted in patients with cirrhosis following mobilization of bone marrow stem cells by granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF).
Three recent studies have demonstrated G-CSF induced mobilization of bone marrow stem cells (CD34 cells) in peripheral blood and their subsequent increase in liver tissue and improved survival in patients with alcoholic hepatitis and ACLF. However, there is a paucity of data on whether G-CSF improves survival and prognosis in patients with decompensated cirrhosis.
Verma, Singh et al have shown in an open label trial that there was significantly better 12 month transplant free survival in ( GCSF+ Growth hormone + standard medical therapy group ) and ( G CSF + standard medical therapy group ) as compared to standard medical therapy group alone. CD 34+ cells at day 6 of therapy increased as compared to baseline. There was also a significant decrease of clinical scores, improvement in nutrition, better control of ascites, reduction in liver stiffness, lesser episodes of infection as well as improvement in QOL scores in the treatment groups having G CSF as compared to baseline.
In a recent study by Newsome et al, a multicentre, open label randomized phase 2 trial, patients were randomized to standard care, treatment with subcutaneous G CSF or treatment with G CSF for 5 days followed by leukaphersis and IV infusion of CD 133 positive haematopoietic stem cells. They did not find any difference in MELD score over time in all 3 treatment groups. Serious adverse effects were more common in the G CSF groups than in standard treatment group.
In a study by Kedarisetty CK et al. a significantly larger proportion of patients with decompensated cirrhosis given a combination of G-CSF \& Darbopoietin α survived for 12 months more than patients given only placebo ( 68% vs. 26.9%; P = 0.001 ). The combination therapy also reduced liver severity scores and sepsis to a greater extent than placebo.
In view of the conflicting results of the above studies and no studies on the use of multiple courses of GCSF in patients with decompensated cirrhosis in a double blind manner, the present study was undertaken to assess the safety and efficacy of G-CSF in patients with decompensated cirrhosis in the form of a double blinded RCT.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Standard Medical Therapy + G CSF Therapy | Active comparator | Drug: G-CSFStandard medical therapy will include nutritional support, rifaximin, lactulose, bowel wash, albumin, diuretics, multivitamins, antibiotics. fresh frozen plasma and packed red-cell transfusions (as required). G-CSF ( prefilled syringe) at the dosage of 5 μg/Kg subcutaneously every 12 hr will be administered for five consecutive days. Four such cycles at 3 monthly intervals will be administered. |
| Standard Medical Therapy + Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: PlaceboStandard medical therapy will include nutritional support, rifaximin, lactulose, bowel wash, albumin, diuretics, multivitamins, antibiotics. fresh frozen plasma and packed red-cell transfusions (as required). Placebo ( prefilled syringe) filled with normal saline subcutaneously every 12 hr will be administered for five consecutive days. Four such cycles at 3 monthly intervals will be administered. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Decompensated Cirrhosis of liver irrespective of etiology
Key exclusion criteria (15 listed)
- Acute on chronic liver failure (fulfilling either APASL or CANONIC criteria of ACLF)
- Splenic diameter of more than 18 cm
- Concomitant HCC or other active malignancy
- Upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the previous 7 days
- Portal vein thrombosis
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| G-CSFG-CSF will be administered as prefilled syringes at a dosage of 5 μg/Kg subcutaneously every 12 hr for five consecutive days. Four such cycles will be administered at three monthly intervals. | Drug | Standard Medical Therapy + G CSF Therapy |
| PlaceboPlacebo ( prefilled syringe) filled with normal saline subcutaneously every 12 hr will be administered for five consecutive days. Four such cycles at 3 monthly intervals will be administered. | Drug | Standard Medical Therapy + Placebo |
Primary outcome
Overall Survival
Time frame: One year
Overall Survival at 1 year from the onset of therapy
9 secondary outcomes
Hemopoietic stem cell mobilisation
Time frame: One Year
Clinical improvement in liver functions
Time frame: One Year
Biochemical improvement in liver functions
Time frame: One Year
Improvement in nutritional status
Time frame: One Year
Improvement in quality of life
Time frame: One year
Depression
Time frame: One year
Demoralisation scale
Time frame: One year
Immunological profile
Time frame: One year
Safety of G-CSF as assessed by its adverse effects
Time frame: One year
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Jul 2019.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 35322373Venkitaraman A, De A, Verma N, Kumari S, Leishangthem B, Sharma RR, Kalra N, Grover S, Singh V. Multiple cycles of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in decompensated cirrhosis: a double-blind RCT. Hepatol Int. 2022 Oct;16(5):1127-1136. doi: 10.1007/s12072-022-10314-x. Epub 2022 Mar 23.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Decompensated Cirrhosis of Liver
Enrolling by invitationPhase 4
Low Dose Versus Standard Dose Albumin
Decompensated Cirrhosis and Ascites
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Risk Stratification for Adverse Events in End-Stage Liver Disease
Decompensated Cirrhosis
RecruitingObservational study
VIATORR® TIPS Study Evaluating 6-10mm Diameters (VIATIPS)
Ascites, Variceal Bleeding
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
RTX001 Autologous Engineered Macrophages for Liver Cirrhosis
End-stage Liver Disease (ESLD), Cirrhosis, Liver
Recruiting
Hospital @ Home Model of Care for Cirrhosis
Decompensated Cirrhosis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2/3 study testing G-CSF in people with Decompensated Cirrhosis of Liver, run by Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh at 1 site in India.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 15 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Jul 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in India. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Virendra Singh, DM (7087009338, virendrasingh100@hotmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Overall Survival (time frame: One year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03911037, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Jul 2019.