AzTrials
AzTrials

Cystic FibrosisFLONAMUCNCT03911258

Epidemiology of the Nasal Flora at the Reference Center for Cystic Fibrosis of Queen Fabiola Children's University Hospital.

A study testing nasopharyngeal swab versus nasal wash in people with Cystic Fibrosis, run by Queen Fabiola Children's University Hospital at 1 site in Belgium.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Cystic fibrosis (CF) is the most common autosomal recessive inherited genetic disorder in North America, Australia and Europe. CF is due to cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator gene mutation (CFTR) coding for a chloride channel located at the apical membrane of epithelial cells. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages Up to 20 years
Conditions the study is for
Cystic Fibrosis
What is being tested?
nasopharyngeal swab versus nasal wash
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
70 participants
Where
1 siteBelgium
Study dates
6 Feb 2019to 30 Apr 2020
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Up to 20 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Cystic fibrosis patients aged 0-20y followed in Cystic fibrosis at HUDERF
  • For each participant, both parents or legally acceptable representative(s) must sign an informed consent form (ICF) indicating that they understand the purpose of, and procedures required for, the study and is willing to allow the child to participate in the study.
  • Assent is also required of children capable of understanding the study (typically participants 7 years of age and older).

Who cannot join

  • Any clinical situation that prohibit the taking of samples as defined in this protocol:
  • Severe respiratory distress
  • An altered state of consciousness
  • A pulmonary complication contrary to the realization of respiratory physiotherapy (pneumothorax, hemoptysis).

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Belgium1 site
  • Hôpital Universitaire Des Enfants Reine Fabiola

    Brussels, 1020

Other trials in Belgium

About this study

Cystic fibrosis (CF) is the most common autosomal recessive inherited genetic disorder in North America, Australia and Europe.

CF is due to cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator gene mutation (CFTR) coding for a chloride channel located at the apical membrane of epithelial cells. The most common mutation is the deletion of the amino acid phenylalanine at the codon 508 (ΔF508) affecting 70% of the patients.

Read more

The CFTR channel participates in the regulation of the volume and composition of exocrine secretions. At the level of the lungs, this results in a thickening of the mucus with a dysfunction of the mucociliary clearance promoting colonization of pathogenic microorganisms. Patients with cystic fibrosis therefore have a natural susceptibility to develop acute and then chronic respiratory infections, gradually leading to irreversible respiratory tract lesions called bronchiectasis. Different germs such as Haemophilus influenzae and Staphylococcus aureus colonize the airways early in life. The progression of the disease causes furthermore a colonization by opportunistic germs such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Burkholderia cepacia, which are associated with higher mortality.

Pulmonary exacerbation is a common complication of CF requiring administration of antibiotics. The choice of these antibiotics depends on the germs that the patient carries in his respiratory tract.

The type of sampling and the conditions under which they are taken are therefore very important. Sputum and oropharyngeal smear are used in adolescents and children respectively to collect respiratory secretions in clinical routine. The recent literature describes induced sputum, obtained after a physiotherapy session and a hypertonic serum aerosol, as superior to the oropharyngeal smear alone and equivalent to bronchoalveolar lavage for the evaluation of the microbiological profile of patients who cannot expectorate. However, this technique takes time and requires the presence of a physiotherapist.

Bronchoalveolar lavage is reserved for complex cases that do not respond to standard treatments.

Finally, the nasal flora appears to be involved in the colonization of the lower respiratory tract. Sinuses are described as reservoirs of germs that can induce a recolonization of the lungs despite eradication of the germ (for example after a pulmonary transplantation) .

To our knowledge, no study has investigated the involvement of nasal flora in the clinical course of children with CF.

Conditions
Cystic Fibrosis
Being tested
nasopharyngeal swab versus nasal wash
Medical subject headings
Cystic Fibrosis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • nasopharyngeal swab versus nasal washProcedure or surgery

    The type of procedure will be determine according to patient collaboration

Study groups in NCT03911258
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Nasal flora in CF patientExperimentalNot described
Receives: Procedure: nasopharyngeal swab versus nasal wash

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. concordance between the microbiological results obtained by nasal lavage or swab and sputum in children

    To see if there is any correlation in the cultures of pathogens present in the upper and lower respiratory tracts for any combination of samples taken

    Measured: Day 1

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Impact of upper respiratory microbial flora in the patient clinical course

    To see if there is any correlation between the presence of pathogens in upper respiratory tract (URT) and the alteration of one or more clinical parameters at the time of sampling (BMI, FEV1, FVC, FEF25/75, Number of exacerbations)

    Measured: Day 60

  2. Safety evaluation of the of the different methods of sampling

    Type, frequency, severity and relationship between adverse events observed and sampling procedures performed.

    Measured: Day 1

  3. Tolerance of the different methods of sampling

    Pain / discomfort score induced by the set of sampling procedures measured by means of the "Visual Analogue Scale" (VAS) in children aged 5 or older. The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) consists of a straight line with the endpoints defining extreme limits such as 'no pain at all' (0) and 'pain as bad as it could be' (10). The patient is asked to mark his pain level on the line between the two endpoints. The distance between 'no pain at all' and the mark then defines the subject's pain.

    Measured: Day 1

  4. Tolerance of the different methods of sampling

    Pain / discomfort score induced by the set of sampling procedures measured by means of the FLACC scale (Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability Scale) in children less than 5 years. FLACC scale is a measurement used to assess pain for children between the ages of 2 months and 7 years or individuals that are unable to communicate their pain. The scale is scored in a range of 0-10 with 0 representing no pain. The scale has five criteria, which are each assigned a score of 0, 1 or 2. The criteria evaluated are expression of the face, position of the legs, patient activity, type of cry, consolability

    Measured: Day 1

  5. Tolerance of the different methods of sampling

    Percentage of Drop-out for refusal of nasal sampling

    Measured: Day 60

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted11 Apr 2019
  2. Study start6 Feb 2019
  3. Primary completion30 Apr 2020 (estimated)
  4. Study completion30 Apr 2020 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
70 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03911258
Sponsor's protocol ID
P2018/PNEUMO/FLONAMUC
Acronym
FLONAMUC
Status last verified
Mar 2019
First submitted
4 Mar 2019
Last updated
16 Apr 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing nasopharyngeal swab versus nasal wash in people with Cystic Fibrosis, run by Queen Fabiola Children's University Hospital at 1 site in Belgium.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Apr 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Belgium. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

concordance between the microbiological results obtained by nasal lavage or swab and sputum in children (time frame: Day 1). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Apr 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in