Spinal Cord InjuriesPhase 4NCT03914677
Mecamylamine for Autonomic Dysreflexia Prophylaxis
A Phase 4 study testing Mecamylamine Oral Tablet in people with Spinal Cord Injuries, run by Wayne State University at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This is a preliminary study of the antihypertensive drug mecamylamine, used in the specific circumstance of hypertension caused by autonomic dysreflexia (AD), a condition that affects people with spinal cord injury (SCI). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Spinal Cord Injuries
- What is being tested?
- Mecamylamine Oral Tablet
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 5 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 13 Jun 2019to 31 Dec 2020
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- chronic (>1 year) SCI at T6 or above, American Spinal Injury Association grade A, B, or C
- negative serum pregnancy test for females
Who cannot join
- history of arrhythmia, cardiovascular disease, cerebral aneurysm
- contraindications to use of mecamylamine or midodrine (pregnancy, nursing, glaucoma, kidney disease, pyloric stenosis, arteriosclerosis, or concurrent use of a sulfonamide antibiotic)
- dependence on reflex voiding for bladder management (mecamylamine may cause urinary retention)
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Wayne State University
Detroit, Michigan, 48201
Daniela Ristova-Trendov, MD, 313-745-0590, dristova@med.wayne.edu
EDWARD C NIESHOFF, MD, 2485147659, ecnieshoff@gmail.com
About this study
Official title: Pilot Study of Mecamylamine for Autonomic Dysreflexia Prophylaxis
This is a preliminary study of the antihypertensive drug mecamylamine, used in the specific circumstance of hypertension caused by autonomic dysreflexia (AD), a condition that affects people with spinal cord injury (SCI). Initially, mild sensory stimulation of subjects' legs is used to intentionally provoke AD, as reflected by blood pressure elevation during such stimulation. In subsequent testing sessions, mecamylamine is given prior to sensory stimulation, to show the effect of the drug on preventing these AD-related blood pressure elevations.
Read the detailed description
In this one year pilot study we will enroll 3-5 people with SCI, and aim to develop a simple, convenient BP cuff method to elicit AD (i.e., using a BP cuff applied to the leg as a mild noxious stimulus), and then use that method to preliminarily evaluate the effects of the antihypertensive drug mecamylamine on AD. Study participants will complete up to 5 research visits, will undergo AD provocation using the leg cuff protocol, and will receive escalating doses of mecamylamine, as needed and tolerated, in order to prevent AD:
After signing the informed consent form, at visit 1, subjects will complete an interview to evaluate past medical history, an autonomic dysfunction questionnaire, a physical examination (including an autonomic assessment and specialty SCI exam), vital signs measurement, and baseline testing of the electrical activity of the heart (electrocardiography or ECG testing).
At visit 2, subjects will complete a preparation procedure including: baseline vital signs measurement, an interview to document all medications and/or supplements taken in the prior 24 hours, confirmation of completed bladder/bowel evacuation before the visit, confirmation of no significant illness/injury since last visit, and documentation of any meals before the visit. Next, the subject will be connected to an ECG monitor and a (second) BP cuff will be applied to the arm (for measuring BP response to the leg cuff procedure). With the ECG and arm cuff in place, s/he will undergo the AD provocation procedure: The BP cuff placed around the leg just below the knee will be inflated for up to 10 minutes, as a means of providing sensory stimulation to elicit AD. BP will be measured using the arm cuff every 2 minutes during the leg cuff inflation, and periodically after the leg cuff is deflated, until BP and heart rate are back to baseline values. Physical manifestations and symptoms of AD will be recorded during the period of leg cuff inflation and thereafter, throughout recovery. This BP cuff protocol will be repeated twice during the same visit, with trials separated by a 30-minute recovery period. The leg cuff will be deflated immediately if the blood pressure-measuring cuff shows that systolic BP exceeds 180 mmHg, diastolic BP exceeds 100 mmHg, heart rate is less than 40 or greater than 100 beats per minute, adverse ECG changes are evident, or symptoms are unacceptable to the subject. An established safety plan will be followed in the event of a significant adverse reaction to the leg compression or study drug. If the leg cuff inflation fails to elicit AD, then the subject will be dropped from the study.
At visit 3, a similar visit preparation procedure will be completed as in visit 2. Three hours prior to AD provocation testing with the leg cuff, subjects will receive 2.5 mg of mecamylamine in tablet form, to try to prevent AD. Physical manifestations and symptoms of AD will be recorded during the period of cuff inflation and thereafter, throughout recovery. The leg cuff will be deflated after 10 minutes, or immediately as appropriate according to the same criteria as listed for visit 2. After a 30-minute recovery, the leg cuff inflation will be repeated once during the same session, to confirm whether or not 2.5 mg of mecamylamine eliminates AD, or at least reduces the associated BP elevation, as well as the other manifestations and symptoms. If the dose of 2.5 mg mecamylamine is effective, the subject will not be asked to return for testing with a higher dose and study participation will end with visit 3. If either trial of leg cuff inflation still elicits AD despite premedication with 2.5 mg mecamylamine, then s/he will be scheduled to come back for visit 4.
At visit 4, the visit preparation will be completed as in visits 2 and 3. Three hours prior to testing with the AD provocation procedure, 5 mg of mecamylamine will be given to the participant to try to prevent AD, since the lower dose failed to do so. The same procedures described above for visit 3 will be followed; subjects will again undergo 2 trials of AD provocation with the leg squeezing procedure. If both are successful (i.e., no AD is observed), the subject's participation in the study will end. If, despite premedication with mecamylamine 5 mg, the subject still experiences AD, then s/he will be asked to return for visit 5.
At visit 5, all the procedures as in visit 4 will be repeated, except that subjects will receive 7.5 mg of mecamylamine. Regardless if the medication does not prevent AD, subjects will not be scheduled to come for a follow up, as no further dose escalation will be attempted.
If at visit 3, 4, or 5 a subject experiences symptomatic low blood pressure after taking mecamylamine (manifest as dizziness, lightheadedness, or change in vision; this is considered unlikely based on the published literature), s/he will be asked to drink several glasses of cold water, and possibly to lay down for up to 30 minutes to try to alleviate those symptoms. In the event symptomatic low blood pressure persists, the subject will be given 10 mg of midodrine, a medication to elevate blood pressure. Midodrine would be expected to promptly (in less than an hour) elevate blood pressure and alleviate those symptoms. Upon adequate elevation of blood pressure to cause resolution of the symptoms, the subject will be discharged from the study, because of the adverse effect of mecamylamine. If the midodrine 10 mg fails to resolve symptomatic low blood pressure, then further evaluation and treatment will be provided as appropriate (e.g., intravenous fluids). The latter scenario is considered to be extremely unlikely.
note - visits will be separated by no more than one month
- Conditions
- Spinal Cord Injuries
- Being tested
- Mecamylamine Oral Tablet
- Keywords
- Spinal Cord Injuries, autonomic dysreflexia, mecamylamine
- Medical subject headings
- Spinal Cord Injuries, Autonomic Dysreflexia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Mecamylamine Oral TabletDrug
Also called Vecamyl
nicotinic antagonist (ganglionic blocker)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Mecamylamine Oral Tablet | Experimental | Initial dose - mecamylamine 2.5 mg tablet po 3 hours prior to provocative testing; subsequent dose escalations as needed, to 5 mg and then 7.5 mg, using the same testing methodology. Receives: Drug: Mecamylamine Oral Tablet |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
change in systolic blood pressure
difference in systolic blood pressure during leg cuff inflation vs during unstimulated baseline
Measured: 10 minutes (following initiation of sensory stimulation)
change in heart rate
difference in heart rate during leg cuff inflation vs during unstimulated baseline
Measured: 10 minutes (following initiation of sensory stimulation)
Secondary outcomes (1)
signs and symptoms of autonomic dysreflexia
piloerection, diaphoresis, headache
Measured: 10 minutes (following initiation of sensory stimulation)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Apr 2019
- Study start13 Jun 2019
- Primary completion17 Mar 2020 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Dec 2020 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Spinal Cord InjuriesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Intervention model
- Sequential
- Model description
- dose-escalation
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 5 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Wayne State University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Edward Nieshoff, MD, Wayne State University
- Investigators
- EDWARD C NIESHOFF, MD, Principal investigator, Wayne State University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03914677
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 080518MP2F
- Status last verified
- Oct 2019
- First submitted
- 11 Apr 2019
- Last updated
- 7 Oct 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: De-identified participant data will be made available for all primary and secondary outcomes.
Publications
Braddom RL, Johnson EW. Mecamylamine in control of hyperreflexia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1969 Aug;50(8):448-53 passim. No abstract available.
PubMed 5806088Braddom RL, Rocco JF. Autonomic dysreflexia. A survey of current treatment. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1991 Oct;70(5):234-41.
PubMed 1910647Eldahan KC, Rabchevsky AG. Autonomic dysreflexia after spinal cord injury: Systemic pathophysiology and methods of management. Auton Neurosci. 2018 Jan;209:59-70. doi: 10.1016/j.autneu.2017.05.002. Epub 2017 May 8.
PubMed 28506502Groothuis JT, Rongen GA, Deinum J, Pickkers P, Danser AH, Geurts AC, Smits P, Hopman MT. Sympathetic nonadrenergic transmission contributes to autonomic dysreflexia in spinal cord-injured individuals. Hypertension. 2010 Mar;55(3):636-43. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.109.147330. Epub 2010 Jan 25.
PubMed 20100992
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 7 Oct 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Pilot Study of Mecamylamine for Autonomic Dysreflexia Prophylaxis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03914677
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 080518MP2F
- Conditions
- Spinal Cord Injuries
- Keywords
- Spinal Cord Injuries, autonomic dysreflexia, mecamylamine
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 5 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Wayne State UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 13 Jun 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 17 Mar 2020 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2020 (estimated)
- First posted
- 16 Apr 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a preliminary study of the antihypertensive drug mecamylamine, used in the specific circumstance of hypertension caused by autonomic dysreflexia (AD), a condition that affects people with spinal cord injury (SCI). Initially, mild sensory stimulation of subjects' legs is used to intentionally provoke AD, as reflected by blood pressure elevation during such stimulation. In subsequent testing sessions, mecamylamine is given prior to sensory stimulation, to show the effect of the drug on preventing these AD-related blood pressure elevations.
Detailed description
In this one year pilot study we will enroll 3-5 people with SCI, and aim to develop a simple, convenient BP cuff method to elicit AD (i.e., using a BP cuff applied to the leg as a mild noxious stimulus), and then use that method to preliminarily evaluate the effects of the antihypertensive drug mecamylamine on AD. Study participants will complete up to 5 research visits, will undergo AD provocation using the leg cuff protocol, and will receive escalating doses of mecamylamine, as needed and tolerated, in order to prevent AD:
After signing the informed consent form, at visit 1, subjects will complete an interview to evaluate past medical history, an autonomic dysfunction questionnaire, a physical examination (including an autonomic assessment and specialty SCI exam), vital signs measurement, and baseline testing of the electrical activity of the heart (electrocardiography or ECG testing).
At visit 2, subjects will complete a preparation procedure including: baseline vital signs measurement, an interview to document all medications and/or supplements taken in the prior 24 hours, confirmation of completed bladder/bowel evacuation before the visit, confirmation of no significant illness/injury since last visit, and documentation of any meals before the visit. Next, the subject will be connected to an ECG monitor and a (second) BP cuff will be applied to the arm (for measuring BP response to the leg cuff procedure). With the ECG and arm cuff in place, s/he will undergo the AD provocation procedure: The BP cuff placed around the leg just below the knee will be inflated for up to 10 minutes, as a means of providing sensory stimulation to elicit AD. BP will be measured using the arm cuff every 2 minutes during the leg cuff inflation, and periodically after the leg cuff is deflated, until BP and heart rate are back to baseline values. Physical manifestations and symptoms of AD will be recorded during the period of leg cuff inflation and thereafter, throughout recovery. This BP cuff protocol will be repeated twice during the same visit, with trials separated by a 30-minute recovery period. The leg cuff will be deflated immediately if the blood pressure-measuring cuff shows that systolic BP exceeds 180 mmHg, diastolic BP exceeds 100 mmHg, heart rate is less than 40 or greater than 100 beats per minute, adverse ECG changes are evident, or symptoms are unacceptable to the subject. An established safety plan will be followed in the event of a significant adverse reaction to the leg compression or study drug. If the leg cuff inflation fails to elicit AD, then the subject will be dropped from the study.
At visit 3, a similar visit preparation procedure will be completed as in visit 2. Three hours prior to AD provocation testing with the leg cuff, subjects will receive 2.5 mg of mecamylamine in tablet form, to try to prevent AD. Physical manifestations and symptoms of AD will be recorded during the period of cuff inflation and thereafter, throughout recovery. The leg cuff will be deflated after 10 minutes, or immediately as appropriate according to the same criteria as listed for visit 2. After a 30-minute recovery, the leg cuff inflation will be repeated once during the same session, to confirm whether or not 2.5 mg of mecamylamine eliminates AD, or at least reduces the associated BP elevation, as well as the other manifestations and symptoms. If the dose of 2.5 mg mecamylamine is effective, the subject will not be asked to return for testing with a higher dose and study participation will end with visit 3. If either trial of leg cuff inflation still elicits AD despite premedication with 2.5 mg mecamylamine, then s/he will be scheduled to come back for visit 4.
At visit 4, the visit preparation will be completed as in visits 2 and 3. Three hours prior to testing with the AD provocation procedure, 5 mg of mecamylamine will be given to the participant to try to prevent AD, since the lower dose failed to do so. The same procedures described above for visit 3 will be followed; subjects will again undergo 2 trials of AD provocation with the leg squeezing procedure. If both are successful (i.e., no AD is observed), the subject's participation in the study will end. If, despite premedication with mecamylamine 5 mg, the subject still experiences AD, then s/he will be asked to return for visit 5.
At visit 5, all the procedures as in visit 4 will be repeated, except that subjects will receive 7.5 mg of mecamylamine. Regardless if the medication does not prevent AD, subjects will not be scheduled to come for a follow up, as no further dose escalation will be attempted.
If at visit 3, 4, or 5 a subject experiences symptomatic low blood pressure after taking mecamylamine (manifest as dizziness, lightheadedness, or change in vision; this is considered unlikely based on the published literature), s/he will be asked to drink several glasses of cold water, and possibly to lay down for up to 30 minutes to try to alleviate those symptoms. In the event symptomatic low blood pressure persists, the subject will be given 10 mg of midodrine, a medication to elevate blood pressure. Midodrine would be expected to promptly (in less than an hour) elevate blood pressure and alleviate those symptoms. Upon adequate elevation of blood pressure to cause resolution of the symptoms, the subject will be discharged from the study, because of the adverse effect of mecamylamine. If the midodrine 10 mg fails to resolve symptomatic low blood pressure, then further evaluation and treatment will be provided as appropriate (e.g., intravenous fluids). The latter scenario is considered to be extremely unlikely.
note - visits will be separated by no more than one month
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Intervention model
- Sequential
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
- Model description
- dose-escalation
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Mecamylamine Oral Tablet | Experimental | Drug: Mecamylamine Oral TabletInitial dose - mecamylamine 2.5 mg tablet po 3 hours prior to provocative testing; subsequent dose escalations as needed, to 5 mg and then 7.5 mg, using the same testing methodology. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- chronic (>1 year) SCI at T6 or above, American Spinal Injury Association grade A, B, or C
- negative serum pregnancy test for females
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- history of arrhythmia, cardiovascular disease, cerebral aneurysm
- contraindications to use of mecamylamine or midodrine (pregnancy, nursing, glaucoma, kidney disease, pyloric stenosis, arteriosclerosis, or concurrent use of a sulfonamide antibiotic)
- dependence on reflex voiding for bladder management (mecamylamine may cause urinary retention)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Mecamylamine Oral TabletAlso: Vecamylnicotinic antagonist (ganglionic blocker) | Drug | Mecamylamine Oral Tablet |
Primary outcome
change in systolic blood pressure
Time frame: 10 minutes (following initiation of sensory stimulation)
difference in systolic blood pressure during leg cuff inflation vs during unstimulated baseline
change in heart rate
Time frame: 10 minutes (following initiation of sensory stimulation)
difference in heart rate during leg cuff inflation vs during unstimulated baseline
1 secondary outcome
signs and symptoms of autonomic dysreflexia
Time frame: 10 minutes (following initiation of sensory stimulation)
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 7 Oct 2019.
- Background: PubMed 5806088Braddom RL, Johnson EW. Mecamylamine in control of hyperreflexia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1969 Aug;50(8):448-53 passim. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 1910647Braddom RL, Rocco JF. Autonomic dysreflexia. A survey of current treatment. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1991 Oct;70(5):234-41.
- Background: PubMed 28506502Eldahan KC, Rabchevsky AG. Autonomic dysreflexia after spinal cord injury: Systemic pathophysiology and methods of management. Auton Neurosci. 2018 Jan;209:59-70. doi: 10.1016/j.autneu.2017.05.002. Epub 2017 May 8.
- Background: PubMed 20100992Groothuis JT, Rongen GA, Deinum J, Pickkers P, Danser AH, Geurts AC, Smits P, Hopman MT. Sympathetic nonadrenergic transmission contributes to autonomic dysreflexia in spinal cord-injured individuals. Hypertension. 2010 Mar;55(3):636-43. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.109.147330. Epub 2010 Jan 25.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. De-identified participant data will be made available for all primary and secondary outcomes.
Related trials for Spinal Cord Injuries
Recruiting
Implant for Walking After Incomplete SCI
Spinal Cord Injury (SCI), Gait
Recruiting
MindEx: A Novel, Multifocal, Cognitive Brain-Machine Interface System
Paralysis; Quadriplegic, Quadraplegia
Recruiting
tSCS Combined With Rehabilitation Training in Treating Paraplegic Patients After SCI
Spinal Cord Injury, Paraplegia, Spinal
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Natural History of Shoulder Pathology in Manual Wheelchair Users
Paraplegia, Spinal Cord Injuries
Recruiting
Neuromodulation for Metabolic Dysfunction
Spinal Cord Injuries (SCI), Prediabetes / Type 2 Diabetes
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
EDWARD C NIESHOFF, MD principal investigator
Wayne State University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Mecamylamine Oral Tablet in people with Spinal Cord Injuries, run by Wayne State University at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Oct 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Daniela Ristova-Trendov, MD (313/745-0590, dristova@med.wayne.edu), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
change in systolic blood pressure (time frame: 10 minutes (following initiation of sensory stimulation)). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03914677, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Oct 2019.