AzTrials
AzTrials

Pre-EclampsiaNCT03917342

Electroencephalographic Effects of Spinal Anaesthesia During Caesarean Delivery in Preeclampsia

A study testing EEG measure in people with Pre-Eclampsia and Effects of; Anesthesia, Spinal and Epidural, in Pregnancy, run by Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern at 1 site in Switzerland.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Neuraxial anesthesia has been associated with delayed brainstem conduction and decreasing afferent sensory transmission, thereby modifying reticulo-thalamo-cortical mechanisms regulating arousal. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 45 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
What is being tested?
EEG measure
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
45 participants
Where
1 siteSwitzerland
Study dates
1 May 2019to 31 Dec 2020
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 45 years
  • Women only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Group A: Healthy controls, American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) I or II status, undergoing a hysteroscopic procedure under single shot spinal anaesthesia without intravenous or oral sedation.
  • Group B:
  • Healthy ASA I or II status patients undergoing elective caesarean section at term (>37 weeks of gestation) under spinal single shot anaesthesia without intravenous or oral sedation.
  • Singleton pregnancy.
  • Group C:
  • ASA I, II or III status patients undergoing elective secondary caesarean section at term (>37 weeks of gestation) under spinal single shot anaesthesia without intravenous or oral sedation
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Singleton pregnancy
  • Diagnosis of preeclampsia: Systolic blood pressure over140 mmHg or diastolic pressure over 90 mmHg and
  • Proteinuria over 0.3 grams in a 24-hour urine or protein: creatinine ratio superior to 0.3 or signs of end-organ dysfunction (platelet count < 100,000 µL, serum creatinine >110 mg/L, or doubling of the serum creatinine, elevated serum transaminases to twice normal concentration)

Who cannot join

  • Patient refusal.
  • Active labour.
  • Eclampsia.
  • Hypertensive crisis as defined by systolic blood pressure over 210 mmHg or diastolic pressure over 120 mmHg.
  • Known epilepsy.
  • Anti-epileptic medication and magnesium sulphate.
Show all 12Show fewer
  • Reported or admitted medication or substance abuse (street drugs, opiates, benzodiazepines, alcohol).
  • Known neurological condition with previously pathologic diagnostic imaging or EEG.
  • Severe fetal malformations (gastroschisis and omphalocele, tracheo-oesophageal fistula, cerebral malformations in the category of cephalic disorders, pulmonary hypoplasia, congenital heart disease).
  • Established rupture of membranes prior to spinal anaesthesia.
  • Non-German and non-French speaking parturient.
  • Lack of written consent

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Pascal H Vuilleumier, MD contact

+41 31 632 32 84

pascal.vuilleumier@insel.ch

Switzerland1 site
  • Bern University Hospital

    Bern, 3010

Other trials in Switzerland

About this study

Neuraxial anesthesia has been associated with delayed brainstem conduction and decreasing afferent sensory transmission, thereby modifying reticulo-thalamo-cortical mechanisms regulating arousal. The state of entropy measured by EEG-monitors has detected sedative effects associated with neuraxial anaesthesia in healthy volunteers, as well as during caesarean delivery. Entropy is a measure of the irregularity or disorder of a brains activity - sedation leading to a decrease of irregularity or disorder in the EEG.The aim of this pilot study is to prospectively assess the effect of spinal anaesthesia in healthy and preeclamptic parturients on brain activity. Decreased epileptiform activity in patients with preeclampsia would suggest that early neuraxial analgesia in labouring preeclamptic patients is beneficial, and may protect against neurological complications.

Read the detailed description

Neuraxial anesthesia has been associated with delayed brainstem conduction and decreasing afferent sensory transmission, thereby modifying reticulo-thalamo-cortical mechanisms regulating arousal. The state of entropy measured by EEG-monitors has detected sedative effects associated with neuraxial anaesthesia in healthy volunteers, as well as during caesarean delivery. Entropy is a measure of the irregularity or disorder of a brains activity - sedation leading to a decrease of irregularity or disorder in the EEG.

The EEG activity in general can be separated into background activity, focal abnormalities, and intermittent and paroxysmal activity.8 Background electrical activity measured with the EEG by surface electrodes, are characterized by their corresponding frequency wave bands, ranging from slow waves (< 1 Hz), Delta (1 - 4 Hz), Theta (4 - 8 Hz), Alpha (8 - 12 Hz), Beta (12 - 30 Hz) and Gamma (> 30 Hz). In healthy volunteers, neuraxial anaesthesia was linked to increased activity - the so-called state of paradoxical excitation. This pattern is similar to the sedative low-dose GABAergic effects known to occur in response to the benzodiazepine midazolam. Epileptic potentials as paroxysmal EEG activity are typically seen with seizures, but they can be a sign of other changes of brain state as well (e.g. (pre)eclampsia or high doses of opioids).

Preeclampsia constitutes a heterogeneous multisystemic disorder defined by the new onset of hypertension and proteinuria after 20 weeks of gestation, affecting 2-8 % of all pregnancies world-wide. In this condition the nervous system is commonly affected, being the cause of significant morbidity and mortality, when seizures occur resembling an epileptic grand-mal convulsion. Significantly, cerebral white matter lesions are described several years after eclamptic episodes. Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) is also suggested to be a core component of eclampsia. In this condition is associated extensive white matter changes have been detected, using advanced neuroimaging techniques. EEG changes can be detected before clinical signs of PRES are present, and before ischemia leads to irreversible brain damage.14 In preeclampsia EEG changes are also common, consisting of slow waves in the occipital lobe, as well as spike discharges. These EEG changes have been reported in eclampsia and in severe preeclampsia, with some differences between the two conditions. The prevention of eclampsia, which can occur pre-, intra-, or postpartum, is thus a critical management goal. Current literature only describes the use of EEG entropy - reflecting the state of arousal - during neuraxial anaesthesia in parturients. So far no study has assessed the quantitative (qEEG) or paroxysmal EEG changes induced by neuraxial anaesthesia in parturients undergoing caesarean delivery, and such monitoring has particular relevance in a high-risk patient population with preeclampsia.

Aims

The aim of this pilot study is to prospectively assess the effect of spinal anaesthesia in healthy and preeclamptic parturients on brain activity. Decreased epileptiform activity in patients with preeclampsia would suggest that early neuraxial analgesia in labouring preeclamptic patients is beneficial, and may protect against neurological complications.

Being tested
EEG measure
Medical subject headings
Pre-Eclampsia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • EEG measureDevice

    Frontal 3-derivation EEG measure under different conditions in pregnancy (healthy vs preeclampsia) and baseline non-pregnant women

Study groups in NCT03917342
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Control GroupActive comparatorEEG measure in 15 healthy women undergoing elective hysteroscopy under single shot spinal anesthesia. Bupivacaine 10mg (+-2mg) spinal dose with 15 mcg Fentanyl spinal dose
Receives: Device: EEG measure
Healthy parturientsActive comparatorEEG measure in 15 healthy parturients undergoing elective cesarean delivery under single shot spinal anesthesia.Bupivacaine 10mg (+-2mg) spinal dose with 15 mcg Fentanyl spinal dose
Receives: Device: EEG measure
Preeclamptic parturientsActive comparatorEEG measure in 15 parturients with preeclampsia undergoing elective cesarean delivery under single shot spinal anesthesia.Bupivacaine 10mg (+-2mg) spinal dose with 15 mcg Fentanyl spinal dose
Receives: Device: EEG measure

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Spectral analysis through fast Fourier transformation

    Change from baseline EEG, EEG after one and 60 minutes after neuraxial anaesthesia

    Measured: Baseline, one minute and 60 minutes, 5 minutes for each measure

  2. Spectral analysis of the detection of seizure activity by absolute slope analysis (composite endpoint)

    Change from baseline EEG, EEG after one and 60 minutes after neuraxial anaesthesia

    Measured: Baseline, one minute and 60 minutes, 5 minutes for each measure

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted17 Apr 2019
  2. Study start1 May 2019 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2019 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2020 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Three groups of subjects studied: A: Control group: 15 healthy women B: 15 Healthy parturients: elective cesarean delivery C: 15 preeclamptic parturients: cesarean delivery
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
45 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03917342
Sponsor's protocol ID
20190123
Status last verified
Apr 2019
First submitted
28 Jan 2019
Last updated
17 Apr 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing EEG measure in people with Pre-Eclampsia and Effects of; Anesthesia, Spinal and Epidural, in Pregnancy, run by Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern at 1 site in Switzerland.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Apr 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Switzerland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Pascal H Vuilleumier, MD (+41 31 632 32 84, pascal.vuilleumier@insel.ch), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Spectral analysis through fast Fourier transformation (time frame: Baseline, one minute and 60 minutes, 5 minutes for each measure). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Apr 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in