AzTrials
AzTrials

Hypersensitivity, ImmediateCADECAPNCT03918772

Clinical Determinants and Perioperative Allergic Reactions (CADECAP Study)

An observational study of Hypersensitivity, Immediate and Perioperative Period, run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris at 1 site in France.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The clinical presentation of perioperative allergic and non-allergic clinical reactions is often considered undistinguishable while the accurate analysis of clinical cases shows striking clinical differences which might be predictive of the etiological diagnosis (allergic versus non-allergic). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
How many people
145 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
5 Nov 2018to 22 Mar 2019
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients having experienced a perioperative immediate hypersensitivity where the allergological assessment was performed by the collaborators of this study

Who may be able to join

  • Patients having experienced a perioperative immediate hypersensitivity (including the obstetrical setting) according to one grade of the Ring and Messmer clinical scale, for whom:
  • The clinical history is known and has been related to perioperative immediate hypersensitivity;
  • The biological assessment including plasma histamine and/or tryptase (and serum IgE when available) was performed after the onset of immediate hypersensitivity according to current guidelines;
  • The allergological assessment including skin tests performed by the collaborators of this study was carried out according to current guidelines in surviving patients

Who cannot join

  • Patients who decline to be involved in the study

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

France1 site
  • Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris

    Paris, 75004

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: Clinical Determinants in Perioperative Allergic Immediate Hypersensitivity

The clinical presentation of perioperative allergic and non-allergic clinical reactions is often considered undistinguishable while the accurate analysis of clinical cases shows striking clinical differences which might be predictive of the etiological diagnosis (allergic versus non-allergic).

The four-step Ring and Messmer clinical scale helps to guide acute management of immediate hypersensitivity accordingly to the clinical presentation although this scale does not take into account the mechanism involved (i.e. allergic versus non-allergic). Non-allergic clinical reactions are usually non-life-threatening and may, sometimes, spontaneously resolve in contrast to allergic reactions which are mainly severe and life-threatening conditions, typically called anaphylaxis.

The cornerstones of anaphylaxis management are fluid therapy and epinephrine. However, poor outcome has been reported as a result of delayed treatment and/or inappropriate management of perioperative anaphylaxis.

Read the detailed description

The main objectives of this study are to: i) characterize the clinical and paraclinical determinants of IgE-mediated allergy that could be correlated to the ultimate diagnosis; and ii) elaborate a decision-making algorithm for clinical patterns identification of perioperative allergic reactions to guide acute management, thus potentially decreasing the related morbidity and mortality.

The secondary objectives are to: i) suggest a modification of the Ring and Messmer scale according to the phenotypes involved; ii) identify the clinical characteristics of isolated non-allergic bronchospasm; iii) compare the most frequent agents involved in perioperative IgE-mediated allergy to those reported in the international studies; iv) identify the negative predictive values of skin tests in allergic and non-allergic patients; v) compare the therapeutic modalities used to those recommended in the literature; vi) describe the cases of morbidity and mortality and identify the potential risk factors.

The Ring and Messmer scale is used to quote the clinical features occurring in drug- or latex-induced immediate hypersensitivity and has been adapted to the perioperative setting as follows:

Grade I: Muco-cutaneous signs only (generalized erythema and/or extensive urticaria and/or angioedema) Grade II: Mucocutaneous signs, hypotension, tachycardia and/or moderate bronchospasm Grade III: Mucocutaneous signs, cardiovascular collapse, tachycardia or bradycardia, bronchospasm, digestive signs Grade IV: Cardiac arrest Grade V: Death

Perioperative immediate hypersensitivity reaction requires further allergologic assessment.

The allergologic assessment is performed a few weeks after the reaction to confirm or disprove an allergic mechanism behind the reaction (i.e. allergy versus non-allergy), and to identify culprit agent(s) and safe drugs, including suitable alternatives. It is based on the review of the details of the reaction along with histamine and/or tryptase levels and specific Immunoglobulin E levels (when available) and skin tests results.

Plasma histamine and/or tryptase levels and Immunoglobulin E levels are measured at the time of the reaction. Acute tryptase levels are compared to baseline tryptase measured at least 24 hours after the reaction or when the patient is referred for allergological investigation. Skin tests, including prick-tests and intradermal tests, are performed during the allergological assessment.

Keywords
Anaphylaxis, Epinephrine, Hypersensitivity, Immediate, Morbidity, Mortality, Perioperative Period, Skin Tests, Tryptases
Medical subject headings
Hypersensitivity, Immediate, Anaphylaxis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT03918772
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Perioperative immediate hypersensitivityPatients having experienced perioperative immediate hypersensitivity

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Identification of the predictive muco-cutaneous signs of perioperative allergic immediate hypersensitivity as assessed by the Ring and Messmer clinical scale

    muco-cutaneous signs (generalized erythema and/or extensive urticaria and/or angioedema)

    Measured: From date of the perioperative clinical reaction up to 6 hours

  2. Identification of the predictive heart rate of perioperative allergic immediate hypersensitivity as assessed by the Ring and Messmer clinical scale

    heart rate (beat/min.)

    Measured: From date of the perioperative clinical reaction up to 6 hours

  3. Identification of the predictive arterial pressure of perioperative allergic immediate hypersensitivity as assessed by the Ring and Messmer clinical scale

    arterial pressure (mmHg)

    Measured: From date of the perioperative clinical reaction up to 6 hours

  4. Identification of the predictive upper gastrointestinal symptoms of perioperative allergic immediate hypersensitivity as assessed by the Ring and Messmer clinical scale

    digestive signs (vomiting)

    Measured: From date of the perioperative clinical reaction up to 6 hours

  5. Identification of the predictive lower gastrointestinal symptoms of perioperative allergic immediate hypersensitivity as assessed by the Ring and Messmer clinical scale

    digestive signs (diarrhea)

    Measured: From date of the perioperative clinical reaction up to 6 hours

  6. Identification of recurrence of perioperative allergic immediate hypersensitivity as assessed by the Ring and Messmer clinical scale

    recurrence of symptoms following a symptom-free response

    Measured: From date of the perioperative clinical reaction up to 6 hours

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. Drugs involved in adverse reactions as assessed by the Ring and Messmer clinical scale

    To identify the drugs involved in the onset of perioperative allergic clinical reactions and compare our results to those provided in the different international epidemiologic studies regarding perioperative immediate hypersensitivity.

    Measured: From date of the perioperative clinical reaction and up to 100 months

  2. Negative predictive values of skin tests in allergic and non-allergic patients

    Negative skin-tested agents administered according to the results of allergological follow-up during subsequent anesthetics in allergic and non-allergic patients

    Measured: Up to 5 years after the allergologic follow-up

  3. Participants with treatment-related adverse events as assessed by by CTCAE v4.0 and fluid therapy

    To identify the number of patients who received fluid therapy (volume, type) in allergic hypersensitivity

    Measured: Through study completion, an average of 2 years

  4. participants with treatment-related adverse events as assessed by CTCAE v4.0 and vasoconstrictive agents

    To identify the number of patients who received vasoconstrictive agents (ephedrine, neosynephrine, epinephrine, norepinephrine) and corresponding cumulative doses

    Measured: Through study completion, an average of 2 years

  5. participants with treatment-related adverse events as assessed by CTCAE v4.0 and salbutamol and/or steroids

    To identify the number of patients who received salbutamol, steroids and corresponding doses

    Measured: Through study completion, an average of 2 years

  6. Participants with treatment-related adverse events as assessed by CTCAE v4.0 and intensive care unit admission

    To identify the number of patients who were admitted in intensive care unit

    Measured: Through study completion, an average of 2 years

  7. Participants with treatment-related adverse events as assessed by CTCAE v4.0 and morbidity

    To report the morbidity cases including cardiac and/or renal and/or hepatic and/or neurologic failure(s) after perioperative allergic immediate hypersensitivity

    Measured: Through study completion, an average of 2 years

  8. Participants with treatment-related adverse events as assessed by CTCAE v4.0 and mortality

    To report the mortality cases after perioperative allergic immediate hypersensitivity

    Measured: Through study completion, an average of 2 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted18 Apr 2019
  2. Study start5 Nov 2018
  3. Primary completion5 Nov 2018
  4. Study completion22 Mar 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
145 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03918772
Sponsor's protocol ID
2018-043
Acronym
CADECAP
Status last verified
Mar 2019
First submitted
12 Mar 2019
Last updated
6 Apr 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Hypersensitivity, Immediate and Perioperative Period, run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Apr 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Identification of the predictive muco-cutaneous signs of perioperative allergic immediate hypersensitivity as assessed by the Ring and Messmer clinical scale (time frame: From date of the perioperative clinical reaction up to 6 hours). The study lists 6 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Apr 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in