SepsisPANTIPSNCT03919851
Physician Administered Antibiotics in a Prehospital Setting
An observational study of Sepsis, run by Odense University Hospital at 1 site in Denmark.
Trial summary
Sepsis is estimated to affect more than 30 million people globally. Detecting sepsis is notoriously difficult and there are no systems in place utilize prehospitally. In Denmark, the Mobile Emergency Care Unit (the MECU), manned by a physician and paramedic, is able to draw blood cultures and take venous lactate… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Sepsis
- What is being tested?
- Antibiotics
- How many people
- 117 participants
- Where
- 1 siteDenmark
- Study dates
- 31 Oct 2018to 15 Feb 2019
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: All patients treated by the MECU in Odense from November 1st 2013 to October 31st 2018
Inclusion: Criteria: Antibiotics administrated by prehospital physician
Exclusion: Criteria: Age below 18 years. No prehospital administration of antibiotics. Patients without inhospital medical records or patients released at the prehospital scene following treatment.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Physician Administered Antibiotics in a Prehospital Mobile Emergency Care Unit
Sepsis is estimated to affect more than 30 million people globally. Detecting sepsis is notoriously difficult and there are no systems in place utilize prehospitally. In Denmark, the Mobile Emergency Care Unit (the MECU), manned by a physician and paramedic, is able to draw blood cultures and take venous lactate measurements before administering antibiotics.
This study aims to conduct a quality control on the ability of the MECU to recognize and treat sepsis by confirming the amounts of in-hospitally diagnosed cases. Furthermore the study investigates whether the blood cultures falls within an acceptable range of contamination.
Read the detailed description
In Denmark, the Emergency Medical System (EMS) consists of not only ambulances operated by paramedics and emergency technicians (EMTs) but also of Mobile Emergency Care Unit (MECU) staffed with an emergency physician with specialist training in anesthesiology and a paramedic. Only the physician on the MECU can administer prehospital antibiotics in Denmark; this emphasizes the importance of the first responding emergency units' capability in detecting and realizing the need for antibiotics in a patient so that the MECU can be requested and treatment initiated quickly.
Determining the administration of antibiotics is done at the anesthesiologists' discretion.
The purpose of administering antibiotics prehospitally is to reduce the time gap between suspicion of sepsis arises and the administration of antibiotics.
The purpose of this retrospective study is to conduct a quality control of the obtaining of blood cultures and of the administration of antibiotics in the prehospital setting serviced by the MECU in Odense in the Region of Southern Denmark in a time interval of 5 years (November 2013- October 2018).
The primary purpose is to associate the prehospital tentative diagnosis (assigned by the MECU) with the final diagnosis (ICD10 from hospital charts) including: 1: An indication for antibiotic therapy and 2: An assessment of the feasibility and potential benefit of the blood cultures obtained. 3: A description of the bacteria found in the blood cultures.
The association between initial prehospital diagnosis and final the diagnosis will be compared.
Secondly the patients seen by the MECU will be characterized regarding diagnosis (ICD10-classification), age, sex, medication, and the first set of vital parameters (Heart rate, Blood pressure, Respratory rate, Oxygen saturation, Glasgow Coma Score, Temperature).
Hypothesis The indication for giving prehospital antibiotics is supported by the prehospital blood culture and by additional findings reproduced inhospitally.
The prehospital tentative diagnosis is confirmed in-hospitally. Prehospital blood sampling is associated with an acceptably low range of contamination.
- Conditions
- Sepsis
- Being tested
- Antibiotics
- Keywords
- Prehospital recognition and treatment
- Medical subject headings
- Sepsis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
AntibioticsDrug
Also called Blood culture
Administration of antibiotics
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Prehospital diagnosis confirmed
Prehospital tentative diagnosis matches inhospital diagnosis
Measured: Up to 30 days
Secondary outcomes (2)
Blood culture positive
Findings in the blood culture supports the diagnosis sepsis
Measured: First day of admission
Blood culture contamination below 5%
Findings of bacteria attributed to contamination below 1 in 20 cultures
Measured: 6 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Apr 2019
- Study start31 Oct 2018
- Primary completion15 Feb 2019
- Study completion15 Feb 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (9)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for SepsisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Odense University HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Enrolment
- 117 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Odense University Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Soren Mikkelsen, Odense University Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03919851
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Prehospital antibiotics
- Acronym
- PANTIPS
- Status last verified
- Apr 2019
- First submitted
- 16 Apr 2019
- Last updated
- 18 Apr 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided: Anonymized data may be shared on reasonable request
Publications
Perner A, Lassen AT, Schierbeck J, Storgaard M, Reiter N, Benfield T. [Disease burden and definition of sepsis in adults]. Ugeskr Laeger. 2018 Apr 9;180(15):V09170685. Danish.
PubMed 29690984Seymour CW, Kahn JM, Martin-Gill C, Callaway CW, Yealy DM, Scales D, Angus DC. Delays From First Medical Contact to Antibiotic Administration for Sepsis. Crit Care Med. 2017 May;45(5):759-765. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002264.
PubMed 28234754Moore C, Bulger J, Morgan M, Driscoll T, Porter A, Islam S, Smyth M, Perkins G, Sewell B, Rainer T, Nanayakkara P, Okolie C, Allen S, Fegan G, Davies J, Foster T, Francis N, Smith FG, Ellis G, Shanahan T, Howe R, Snooks H. Prehospital recognition and antibiotics for 999 patients with sepsis: protocol for a feasibility study. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2018 Mar 12;4:64. doi: 10.1186/s40814-018-0258-8. eCollection 2018.
PubMed 29564147Smyth MA, Brace-McDonnell SJ, Perkins GD. Impact of Prehospital Care on Outcomes in Sepsis: A Systematic Review. West J Emerg Med. 2016 Jul;17(4):427-37. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2016.5.30172. Epub 2016 Jul 5.
PubMed 27429693Guerra WF, Mayfield TR, Meyers MS, Clouatre AE, Riccio JC. Early detection and treatment of patients with severe sepsis by prehospital personnel. J Emerg Med. 2013 Jun;44(6):1116-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2012.11.003. Epub 2013 Jan 13.
PubMed 23321295Joynes EL, Martin J, Ross M. Management of Septic Shock in the Remote Prehospital Setting. Air Med J. 2016 Jul-Aug;35(4):235-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amj.2016.04.001. Epub 2016 May 24.
PubMed 27393760Bodilsen J, Dalager-Pedersen M, Schonheyder HC, Nielsen H. Time to antibiotic therapy and outcome in bacterial meningitis: a Danish population-based cohort study. BMC Infect Dis. 2016 Aug 9;16:392. doi: 10.1186/s12879-016-1711-z.
PubMed 27507415Andersson H, Axelsson C, Larsson A, Bremer A, Gellerstedt M, Bang A, Herlitz J, Ljungstrom L. The early chain of care in bacteraemia patients: Early suspicion, treatment and survival in prehospital emergency care. Am J Emerg Med. 2018 Dec;36(12):2211-2218. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.04.004. Epub 2018 Apr 5.
PubMed 29653787Justesen US, Larsen BW, Eshoj O, Sogaard P. [Blood cultures--indication and antibiotic therapy]. Ugeskr Laeger. 2003 May 5;165(19):1989-94. Danish.
PubMed 12795074
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Apr 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Physician Administered Antibiotics in a Prehospital Mobile Emergency Care Unit
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03919851
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PANTIPS / Prehospital antibiotics
- Conditions
- Sepsis
- Keywords
- Prehospital recognition and treatment
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 117 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Odense University HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 31 Oct 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 15 Feb 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 15 Feb 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 18 Apr 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Sepsis is estimated to affect more than 30 million people globally. Detecting sepsis is notoriously difficult and there are no systems in place utilize prehospitally. In Denmark, the Mobile Emergency Care Unit (the MECU), manned by a physician and paramedic, is able to draw blood cultures and take venous lactate measurements before administering antibiotics.
This study aims to conduct a quality control on the ability of the MECU to recognize and treat sepsis by confirming the amounts of in-hospitally diagnosed cases. Furthermore the study investigates whether the blood cultures falls within an acceptable range of contamination.
Detailed description
In Denmark, the Emergency Medical System (EMS) consists of not only ambulances operated by paramedics and emergency technicians (EMTs) but also of Mobile Emergency Care Unit (MECU) staffed with an emergency physician with specialist training in anesthesiology and a paramedic. Only the physician on the MECU can administer prehospital antibiotics in Denmark; this emphasizes the importance of the first responding emergency units' capability in detecting and realizing the need for antibiotics in a patient so that the MECU can be requested and treatment initiated quickly.
Determining the administration of antibiotics is done at the anesthesiologists' discretion.
The purpose of administering antibiotics prehospitally is to reduce the time gap between suspicion of sepsis arises and the administration of antibiotics.
The purpose of this retrospective study is to conduct a quality control of the obtaining of blood cultures and of the administration of antibiotics in the prehospital setting serviced by the MECU in Odense in the Region of Southern Denmark in a time interval of 5 years (November 2013- October 2018).
The primary purpose is to associate the prehospital tentative diagnosis (assigned by the MECU) with the final diagnosis (ICD10 from hospital charts) including: 1: An indication for antibiotic therapy and 2: An assessment of the feasibility and potential benefit of the blood cultures obtained. 3: A description of the bacteria found in the blood cultures.
The association between initial prehospital diagnosis and final the diagnosis will be compared.
Secondly the patients seen by the MECU will be characterized regarding diagnosis (ICD10-classification), age, sex, medication, and the first set of vital parameters (Heart rate, Blood pressure, Respratory rate, Oxygen saturation, Glasgow Coma Score, Temperature).
Hypothesis The indication for giving prehospital antibiotics is supported by the prehospital blood culture and by additional findings reproduced inhospitally.
The prehospital tentative diagnosis is confirmed in-hospitally. Prehospital blood sampling is associated with an acceptably low range of contamination.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- All patients treated by the MECU in Odense from November 1st 2013 to October 31st 2018
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| AntibioticsAlso: Blood cultureAdministration of antibiotics | Drug | – |
Primary outcome
Prehospital diagnosis confirmed
Time frame: Up to 30 days
Prehospital tentative diagnosis matches inhospital diagnosis
2 secondary outcomes
Blood culture positive
Time frame: First day of admission
Blood culture contamination below 5%
Time frame: 6 days
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Apr 2019.
- Results publication: PubMed 29690984Perner A, Lassen AT, Schierbeck J, Storgaard M, Reiter N, Benfield T. [Disease burden and definition of sepsis in adults]. Ugeskr Laeger. 2018 Apr 9;180(15):V09170685. Danish.
- Results publication: PubMed 28234754Seymour CW, Kahn JM, Martin-Gill C, Callaway CW, Yealy DM, Scales D, Angus DC. Delays From First Medical Contact to Antibiotic Administration for Sepsis. Crit Care Med. 2017 May;45(5):759-765. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002264.
- Results publication: PubMed 29564147Moore C, Bulger J, Morgan M, Driscoll T, Porter A, Islam S, Smyth M, Perkins G, Sewell B, Rainer T, Nanayakkara P, Okolie C, Allen S, Fegan G, Davies J, Foster T, Francis N, Smith FG, Ellis G, Shanahan T, Howe R, Snooks H. Prehospital recognition and antibiotics for 999 patients with sepsis: protocol for a feasibility study. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2018 Mar 12;4:64. doi: 10.1186/s40814-018-0258-8. eCollection 2018.
- Results publication: PubMed 27429693Smyth MA, Brace-McDonnell SJ, Perkins GD. Impact of Prehospital Care on Outcomes in Sepsis: A Systematic Review. West J Emerg Med. 2016 Jul;17(4):427-37. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2016.5.30172. Epub 2016 Jul 5.
- Results publication: PubMed 23321295Guerra WF, Mayfield TR, Meyers MS, Clouatre AE, Riccio JC. Early detection and treatment of patients with severe sepsis by prehospital personnel. J Emerg Med. 2013 Jun;44(6):1116-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2012.11.003. Epub 2013 Jan 13.
- Results publication: PubMed 27393760Joynes EL, Martin J, Ross M. Management of Septic Shock in the Remote Prehospital Setting. Air Med J. 2016 Jul-Aug;35(4):235-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amj.2016.04.001. Epub 2016 May 24.
- Results publication: PubMed 27507415Bodilsen J, Dalager-Pedersen M, Schonheyder HC, Nielsen H. Time to antibiotic therapy and outcome in bacterial meningitis: a Danish population-based cohort study. BMC Infect Dis. 2016 Aug 9;16:392. doi: 10.1186/s12879-016-1711-z.
- Results publication: PubMed 29653787Andersson H, Axelsson C, Larsson A, Bremer A, Gellerstedt M, Bang A, Herlitz J, Ljungstrom L. The early chain of care in bacteraemia patients: Early suspicion, treatment and survival in prehospital emergency care. Am J Emerg Med. 2018 Dec;36(12):2211-2218. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.04.004. Epub 2018 Apr 5.
- Results publication: PubMed 12795074Justesen US, Larsen BW, Eshoj O, Sogaard P. [Blood cultures--indication and antibiotic therapy]. Ugeskr Laeger. 2003 May 5;165(19):1989-94. Danish.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided. Anonymized data may be shared on reasonable request
Related trials for Sepsis
Not yet recruitingPhase 2/3
A Pivotal Safety and Immunogenicity GBS-NN/NN2 Vaccine Maternal Immunisation Trial
Streptococcus Agalactiae Infection, Neonatal Sepsis
Active, not recruiting
CT for Personalized Mechanical Ventilation
Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury, Sepsis Syndrome
RecruitingPhase 4
A Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Extended and Intermittent Infusion of Beta-lactams in Critically Ill Paediatric Patients
Infection, Sepsis
Not yet recruiting
Double Plasma Separation and Adsorption in Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure (DPMAS-ACLF Trial)
Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure (ACLF)
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
Thymosin Alpha 1 and IgM Levels in Sepsis
Sepsis, Septic Shock
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Sepsis, run by Odense University Hospital at 1 site in Denmark.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Apr 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Prehospital diagnosis confirmed (time frame: Up to 30 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03919851, which also lists 9 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Apr 2019.