Knee ArthropathyKneeOptOut2NCT03920930
Optimization of a Fast-track Concept for Knee Joint Replacement
A study testing Late local infiltration analgesia and Early local infiltration analgesia in people with Knee Arthropathy and Postoperative Pain, run by Charite University, Berlin, Germany at 1 site in Germany.
Trial summary
In an estimated 150,000 patients, a knee joint replacement is performed in Germany every year. The perioperative care of the patients aims at an optimal surgical technique, which leads to a high functionality in the joint, and above all at an adequate pain treatment. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Knee Arthropathy, Postoperative Pain, Postoperative Complications
- What is being tested?
- Late local infiltration analgesia and Early local infiltration analgesia
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 70 participants
- Where
- 1 siteGermany
- Study dates
- 1 Mar 2019to 30 Jul 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- patients undergoing elective, primary knee joint replacement in combined general anaesthesia
Who cannot join
- heart insufficiency NYHA >2
- liver insufficiency > CHILD B
- evidence of diabetic polyneuropathy
- severe adipositas BMI >40
- patients < 18 years
- pregnancy
Show all 10Show fewer
- in case of police custody
- participation in a paralleled interventional RCT in a time frame of 30 days
- chronic opioid therapy >3 months before scheduled surgery
- allergy against medication required for surgery or anaesthesia
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Optimization of a Fast-track Concept for Knee Replacement: A Single-blind, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial
In an estimated 150,000 patients, a knee joint replacement is performed in Germany every year. The perioperative care of the patients aims at an optimal surgical technique, which leads to a high functionality in the joint, and above all at an adequate pain treatment. Patients experience pain especially intraoperatively and in the first days after the operation. The intensity of pain is a decisive factor that can hinder the patient's mobilization. In the KneeOptOut study (ethics application number EA4/009/17), which has already been successfully carried out and approved by this ethics committee, it was shown that the use of local infiltration anaesthesia (LIA) for pain therapy after primary knee endoprosthetics is comparable to catheter-supported regional anaesthesia (manuscript under review at the European Journal of Anaesthesiology). During surgery, the morphine requirement of patients in the LIA group was significantly higher than that of patients who underwent catheterization. Postoperatively, however, both subjective pain by VAS and opiate consumption were comparable.
In order to optimize the intraoperative opiate need/consumption, an early-intraoperative procedure for local infiltration anesthesia will now be compared with the previous late-intraoperative procedure. Both procedures correspond to SOP for the treatment of primary knee endoprostheses and are currently used depending on the surgeon's requirements.
- Being tested
- Late local infiltration analgesia, Early local infiltration analgesia
- Keywords
- ERAS, pain, knee arthroplasty, joint pain, regional anaesthesia
- Medical subject headings
- Pain, Postoperative, Postoperative Complications, Pain, Arthralgia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Late local infiltration analgesiaProcedure or surgery
Also called late LIA
Patient receive an infiltration of local anaesthetics around the knee directly after total knee replacement for postoperative pain control.
Early local infiltration analgesiaProcedure or surgery
Also called early LIA
The local infiltration analgesia is applied in a total of 4 steps during the preparation of the knee joint: 1. after the skin incision, 2. after the capsule incision, 3. after complete exposure of the knee joint, 4. when the posterior knee capsule is reached.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Early-intraoperative Local infiltration technique | Experimental | A distal regional anaesthesia is performed in which the nerves are blocked by a local anaesthetic in the tissue in the immediate vicinity of the operating area ("tissue infiltration technique"). The LIA is applied in a total of 4 steps during the preparation of the knee joint: 1. after the skin incision, 2. after the capsule incision, 3. after complete exposure of the knee joint, 4. when the posterior knee capsule is reached. Receives: Procedure: Early local infiltration analgesia |
| Late-intraoperative Local infiltration technique | Active comparator | A distal regional anaesthesia is performed in which the nerves are blocked by a local anaesthetic in the tissue in the immediate vicinity of the operating area ("tissue infiltration technique"). The LIA is applied after the preparation of the femur and tibia bone shortly before the prosthesis is inserted and during the retreat from the knee joint. Receives: Procedure: Late local infiltration analgesia |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Opioid consumption
amount of opioids administered intraoperative measured as equivalent dose to morphin
Measured: intraoperative, up to 3 hours
Secondary outcomes (12)
time to first mobilisation (standing)
time from end of surgery until patients is able to stand
Measured: up to 48 hours postoperatively
patients satisfaction (11-point likert scale)
global satisfaction of patients
Measured: up to 7 days postoperatively
time to first mobilisation (walking)
time from end of surgery until patients is able to walk
Measured: up to 7 days postoperatively
time to achieve full joint mobility
time to achieve full joint mobility (0/0/90°)
Measured: up to 7 days postoperatively
Janda grade of both legs at first day after surgery
best Janda grade in both legs the day after surgery
Measured: up to 24h postoperatively
Pain intensity
intensity of pain in all patients meausered by numeric rating scale (NRS)
Measured: up to 7 days postoperatively
rescue pain medication
number of patients requiring rescue pain medication
Measured: up to 7 days postoperatively
time to discharge
time to discharge from hospital
Measured: up to 14 days postoperatively
Opioid consumption (hospital)
amount of opioids administered until discharge measured as equivalent dose to morphin
Measured: up to 14 days postoperatively
delirium
incidence of postoperative delirium measured by Nursing Delirium Screening Scale (NuDeSc)
Measured: up to 7 days postoperatively
postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV)
incidence of PONV
Measured: up to 7 days postoperatively
surgeon satisfaction (6-point likert scale)
satisfaction of surgeon in points of clarity of the operative field, change of the operative field by LIA and overall satisfaction represented in one value
Measured: intraoperative, up to 3 hours
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Apr 2019
- Study start1 Mar 2019
- Primary completion28 Feb 2021
- Study completion30 Jul 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Knee ArthropathyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Charite University, Berlin, GermanyThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 70 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Charite University, Berlin, Germany
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Sascha Treskatsch, Charite University, Berlin, Germany
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03920930
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- KneeOptOut2
- Acronym
- KneeOptOut2
- Status last verified
- Feb 2023
- First submitted
- 16 Apr 2019
- Last updated
- 14 Feb 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Morin AM, Wulf H. [High volume local infiltration analgesia (LIA) for total hip and knee arthroplasty: a brief review of the current status]. Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther. 2011 Feb;46(2):84-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1272875. Epub 2011 Feb 10. German.
PubMed 21312140Perret M, Fletcher P, Firth L, Yates P. Comparison of patient outcomes in periarticular and intraarticular local anaesthetic infiltration techniques in total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Surg Res. 2015 Jul 31;10:119. doi: 10.1186/s13018-015-0249-x.
PubMed 26227482Peters CL, Shirley B, Erickson J. The effect of a new multimodal perioperative anesthetic regimen on postoperative pain, side effects, rehabilitation, and length of hospital stay after total joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2006 Sep;21(6 Suppl 2):132-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2006.04.017.
PubMed 16950075Suthersan M, Pit S, Gordon L, Loman M, Pezzutti B, Freihaut R. Local infiltration analgesia versus standard analgesia in total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2015 Aug;23(2):198-201. doi: 10.1177/230949901502300217.
PubMed 26321550Kastelik J, Fuchs M, Kramer M, Trauzeddel RF, Ertmer M, von Roth P, Perka C, Kirschbaum SM, Tafelski S, Treskatsch S. Local infiltration anaesthesia versus sciatic nerve and adductor canal block for fast-track knee arthroplasty: A randomised controlled clinical trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2019 Apr;36(4):255-263. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000929.
PubMed 30562225
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 14 Feb 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Optimization of a Fast-track Concept for Knee Replacement: A Single-blind, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03920930
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- KneeOptOut2 / KneeOptOut2
- Keywords
- ERAS, pain, knee arthroplasty, joint pain, regional anaesthesia
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 70 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Charite University, Berlin, GermanyUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Mar 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 28 Feb 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Jul 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 19 Apr 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
In an estimated 150,000 patients, a knee joint replacement is performed in Germany every year. The perioperative care of the patients aims at an optimal surgical technique, which leads to a high functionality in the joint, and above all at an adequate pain treatment. Patients experience pain especially intraoperatively and in the first days after the operation. The intensity of pain is a decisive factor that can hinder the patient's mobilization. In the KneeOptOut study (ethics application number EA4/009/17), which has already been successfully carried out and approved by this ethics committee, it was shown that the use of local infiltration anaesthesia (LIA) for pain therapy after primary knee endoprosthetics is comparable to catheter-supported regional anaesthesia (manuscript under review at the European Journal of Anaesthesiology). During surgery, the morphine requirement of patients in the LIA group was significantly higher than that of patients who underwent catheterization. Postoperatively, however, both subjective pain by VAS and opiate consumption were comparable.
In order to optimize the intraoperative opiate need/consumption, an early-intraoperative procedure for local infiltration anesthesia will now be compared with the previous late-intraoperative procedure. Both procedures correspond to SOP for the treatment of primary knee endoprostheses and are currently used depending on the surgeon's requirements.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Early-intraoperative Local infiltration technique | Experimental | Procedure: Early local infiltration analgesiaA distal regional anaesthesia is performed in which the nerves are blocked by a local anaesthetic in the tissue in the immediate vicinity of the operating area ("tissue infiltration technique"). The LIA is applied in a total of 4 steps during the preparation of the knee joint: 1. after the skin incision, 2. after the capsule incision, 3. after complete exposure of the knee joint, 4. when the posterior knee capsule is reached. |
| Late-intraoperative Local infiltration technique | Active comparator | Procedure: Late local infiltration analgesiaA distal regional anaesthesia is performed in which the nerves are blocked by a local anaesthetic in the tissue in the immediate vicinity of the operating area ("tissue infiltration technique"). The LIA is applied after the preparation of the femur and tibia bone shortly before the prosthesis is inserted and during the retreat from the knee joint. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- patients undergoing elective, primary knee joint replacement in combined general anaesthesia
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- heart insufficiency NYHA >2
- liver insufficiency > CHILD B
- evidence of diabetic polyneuropathy
- severe adipositas BMI >40
- patients < 18 years
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Late local infiltration analgesiaAlso: late LIAPatient receive an infiltration of local anaesthetics around the knee directly after total knee replacement for postoperative pain control. | Procedure or surgery | Late-intraoperative Local infiltration technique |
| Early local infiltration analgesiaAlso: early LIAThe local infiltration analgesia is applied in a total of 4 steps during the preparation of the knee joint: 1. after the skin incision, 2. after the capsule incision, 3. after complete exposure of the knee joint, 4. when the posterior knee capsule is reached. | Procedure or surgery | Early-intraoperative Local infiltration technique |
Primary outcome
Opioid consumption
Time frame: intraoperative, up to 3 hours
amount of opioids administered intraoperative measured as equivalent dose to morphin
12 secondary outcomes
time to first mobilisation (standing)
Time frame: up to 48 hours postoperatively
patients satisfaction (11-point likert scale)
Time frame: up to 7 days postoperatively
time to first mobilisation (walking)
Time frame: up to 7 days postoperatively
time to achieve full joint mobility
Time frame: up to 7 days postoperatively
Janda grade of both legs at first day after surgery
Time frame: up to 24h postoperatively
Pain intensity
Time frame: up to 7 days postoperatively
rescue pain medication
Time frame: up to 7 days postoperatively
time to discharge
Time frame: up to 14 days postoperatively
Opioid consumption (hospital)
Time frame: up to 14 days postoperatively
delirium
Time frame: up to 7 days postoperatively
postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV)
Time frame: up to 7 days postoperatively
surgeon satisfaction (6-point likert scale)
Time frame: intraoperative, up to 3 hours
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 14 Feb 2023.
- Background: PubMed 21312140Morin AM, Wulf H. [High volume local infiltration analgesia (LIA) for total hip and knee arthroplasty: a brief review of the current status]. Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther. 2011 Feb;46(2):84-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1272875. Epub 2011 Feb 10. German.
- Background: PubMed 26227482Perret M, Fletcher P, Firth L, Yates P. Comparison of patient outcomes in periarticular and intraarticular local anaesthetic infiltration techniques in total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Surg Res. 2015 Jul 31;10:119. doi: 10.1186/s13018-015-0249-x.
- Background: PubMed 16950075Peters CL, Shirley B, Erickson J. The effect of a new multimodal perioperative anesthetic regimen on postoperative pain, side effects, rehabilitation, and length of hospital stay after total joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2006 Sep;21(6 Suppl 2):132-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2006.04.017.
- Background: PubMed 26321550Suthersan M, Pit S, Gordon L, Loman M, Pezzutti B, Freihaut R. Local infiltration analgesia versus standard analgesia in total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2015 Aug;23(2):198-201. doi: 10.1177/230949901502300217.
- Background: PubMed 30562225Kastelik J, Fuchs M, Kramer M, Trauzeddel RF, Ertmer M, von Roth P, Perka C, Kirschbaum SM, Tafelski S, Treskatsch S. Local infiltration anaesthesia versus sciatic nerve and adductor canal block for fast-track knee arthroplasty: A randomised controlled clinical trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2019 Apr;36(4):255-263. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000929.
Related trials for Knee Arthropathy
Not yet recruiting
Opioid Reduction and Enhanced Recovery in Orthopaedic Surgery (OREOS)-Knee
Knee Arthroplasty, Total, Partial Knee Arthroplasty
Active, not recruiting
SakuraBead Used as Resorbable Embolic for Genicular Artery Embolization
Osteo Arthritis Knee, Joint Diseases
RecruitingPhase 2
Genicular Artery Embolization for Reducing Pain in Medically Refractory Symptomatic Knee Osteoarthritis
Knee Osteoarthritis, Knee Osteoarthritis (Knee OA)
Not yet recruiting
Comparison of High-Intensity and Conventional Physical Therapy in Musculoskeletal Disorders
Low Back Pain, Radicular Syndrome
Recruiting
The Effect of Different Exercise Training Programs on Muscle Oxygenation in Individuals With Knee Osteoarthritis
Osteoarthritis of Knee
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Late local infiltration analgesia and Early local infiltration analgesia in people with Knee Arthropathy and Postoperative Pain, run by Charite University, Berlin, Germany at 1 site in Germany.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Feb 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Opioid consumption (time frame: intraoperative, up to 3 hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03920930, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Feb 2023.