AzTrials
AzTrials

Gender Ratio of ICSI OutcomeNCT03922568

Effect of Sperm Selection Techniques on Human Neonatal Gender Ratio in Patients Undergoing ICSI

An observational study of Gender Ratio of ICSI Outcome, run by Ganin Fertility Center at 1 site in Egypt.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

babies of known gender born out of 388 ICSI cycles were investigated for the gender ratio and then divided into three groups according to the sperm selection technique used before performing sperm injection. Statistical analysis were made to compare ratios and compare results of three arms Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age
Conditions the study is for
Gender Ratio of ICSI Outcome
What is being tested?
Density Gradient Centrifugation, Physiological ICSI and Magnetic Activated Cell Sorting
How many people
388 participants
Where
1 siteEgypt
Study dates
1 Aug 2016to 30 Mar 2019
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: Cases undergoing ICSI in Ganin Fertility Center

Who may be able to join

  • Full Term Delivery
  • ICSI cases using DGC for sperm selection
  • ICSI cases using MACS for sperm selection
  • ICSI cases using PICSI dishes for sperm selection
  • Fresh blastocyst stage embryo transfer at
  • Fresh ejaculate

Who cannot join

  • Frozen sperm
  • Frozen Embryo transfer
  • Fresh cleavage stage embryo transfer
  • Vanishing Twin Syndrome
  • Fetal Reduction
  • Preimlantation genetically screened embryo transfer

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Egypt1 site
  • Ganin Fertility Center

    Cairo, Cairo Governorate, 11728

Other trials in Egypt

About this study

babies of known gender born out of 388 ICSI cycles were investigated for the gender ratio and then divided into three groups according to the sperm selection technique used before performing sperm injection. Statistical analysis were made to compare ratios and compare results of three arms

Read the detailed description

A total of 529 babies of known gender born out of 388 ICSI cycles between August 2016 and May 2018 at Ganin Fertility Center, Cairo, Egypt, were investigated for the gender ratio and then divided into three groups according to the sperm selection technique used before performing sperm injection; DGC (237 neonates out of 173 ICSI cycles), PICSI (147 neonates out of 109 ICSI cycles) , and MACS (145 neonates out of 106 ICSI cycles). In PICSI and MACS groups. Power analysis was done by comparing the sex ratio of the neonates between DGC, PICSI and MACS. The chi-squared test for independent samples was chosen to perform the power analysis with α-error level at 0.05. P values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. All statistical calculations were done using IBM SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Science; IBM Corp, Armonk, NY, USA) release 22 for Microsoft Windows.

Being tested
Density Gradient Centrifugation, Physiological ICSI, Magnetic Activated Cell Sorting
Keywords
Gender Ratio, PICSI, MACS, Sperm Selection

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Density Gradient CentrifugationOther

    Also called DGC

    semen was layered over 50 % and 90% discontinuous Density Gradient layers in a 15ml conical tube, then centrifuged at 250 g for 8 min at room temperature. supernatant was aspirated and the resulted pellet was washed using Sperm wash media and centrifuged at 250 g for 8 min at room temperature. The final pellet was re suspended in residual volume

  • Physiological ICSIDevice

    Also called PICSI

    Semen processing is done by double layer density gradient method followed by adding Sperm to the dot of hyaluronan on the PICSI dish, within minutes the bound sperm are attached by their acrosome to the surface of the dot. Hyaluronan bound sperms are selected for oocyte injection

  • Magnetic Activated Cell SortingDevice

    Also called MACS

    Semen processing is done by double layer density gradient method. The resulted pellet is labeled with Annexin V microbeads followed by separation on MACS column, the eluted fraction contains non apoptotic sperms suitable for oocyte injection.

Study groups in NCT03922568
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Density Gradient Centrifugation (DGC)semen was layered over 50 % and 90% discontinuous Density Gradient layers in a 15ml conical tube, then centrifuged at 250 g for 8 min at room temperature. supernatant was aspirated and the resulted pellet was washed using Sperm wash media and centrifuged at 250 g for 8 min at room temperature. The final pellet was re suspended in residual volume
Receives: Other: Density Gradient Centrifugation
Physiological ICSI (PICSI)Semen processing is done by double layer DGC method followed by adding Sperm to the dot of hyaluronan on the PICSI dish, within minutes the bound sperm are attached by their acrosome to the surface of the dot. Hyaluronan bound sperms are selected for oocyte injection
Receives: Device: Physiological ICSI
Magnetic Activated Cell Sorting (MACS)Semen processing is done by double layer DGC method. The resulted pellet is labeled with Annexin V microbeads followed by separation on MACS column, the eluted fraction contains non apoptotic sperms suitable for oocyte injection.
Receives: Device: Magnetic Activated Cell Sorting

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Gender ratio

    Neonatal gender ratio

    Measured: 36-40 weeks after ICSI

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted22 Apr 2019
  2. Study start1 Aug 2016
  3. Primary completion30 Mar 2019
  4. Study completion30 Mar 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
388 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03922568
Sponsor's protocol ID
GFC - 003
Status last verified
Apr 2019
First submitted
17 Apr 2019
Last updated
22 Apr 2019
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Publications

  • Celik-Ozenci C, Jakab A, Kovacs T, Catalanotti J, Demir R, Bray-Ward P, Ward D, Huszar G. Sperm selection for ICSI: shape properties do not predict the absence or presence of numerical chromosomal aberrations. Hum Reprod. 2004 Sep;19(9):2052-9. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deh361. Epub 2004 Jun 17.

    PubMed 15205404
  • Avendano C, Franchi A, Taylor S, Morshedi M, Bocca S, Oehninger S. Fragmentation of DNA in morphologically normal human spermatozoa. Fertil Steril. 2009 Apr;91(4):1077-84. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.01.015. Epub 2008 Apr 28.

    PubMed 18440529
  • Said TM, Land JA. Effects of advanced selection methods on sperm quality and ART outcome: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update. 2011 Nov-Dec;17(6):719-33. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmr032. Epub 2011 Aug 25.

    PubMed 21873262
  • McElreavey K, Krausz C. Sex Chromosome Genetics '99. Male infertility and the Y chromosome. Am J Hum Genet. 1999 Apr;64(4):928-33. doi: 10.1086/302351. No abstract available.

    PubMed 10090876
  • Niederberger C. Absence of de novo Y-chromosome microdeletions in male children conceived through intracytoplasmic sperm injection. J Urol. 2005 Sep;174(3):1046. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000171902.28215.84. No abstract available.

    PubMed 16094051
  • Komori S, Kato H, Kobayashi S, Koyama K, Isojima S. Transmission of Y chromosomal microdeletions from father to son through intracytoplasmic sperm injection. J Hum Genet. 2002;47(9):465-8. doi: 10.1007/s100380200066.

    PubMed 12202984
  • Palermo G, Joris H, Devroey P, Van Steirteghem AC. Pregnancies after intracytoplasmic injection of single spermatozoon into an oocyte. Lancet. 1992 Jul 4;340(8810):17-8. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(92)92425-f.

    PubMed 1351601

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Gender Ratio of ICSI Outcome, run by Ganin Fertility Center at 1 site in Egypt.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Apr 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Gender ratio (time frame: 36-40 weeks after ICSI). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03922568, which also lists 7 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Apr 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in