Colonic Diseases, FunctionalAoAColonNCT03922815
Adequacy of Anaesthesia for Colonoscopic Procedures
A study testing rescue fentanyl and rescue propofol in people with Colonic Diseases, Functional, run by Medical University of Silesia at 1 site in Poland.
Trial summary
The aim of this randomized prospective trial is to assess the utility of Adequacy of Anaesthesia technique (Response Entropy and Surgical Pleth Index) for monitoring pain perception intraoperatively and its influence on postoperative pain perception, both patients' and operators' satisfaction in patients undergoing… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Colonic Diseases, Functional
- What is being tested?
- rescue fentanyl and rescue propofol
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 158 participants
- Where
- 1 sitePoland
- Study dates
- 1 Sep 2019to 31 Jan 2020
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- written consent to participate in the study
- written consent to undergo deep sedation for colonoscopic procedure
- general heath condition I-III of American Society of Anaesthesiology
Who cannot join
- necessity of administration of vasoactive drugs influencing SPI monitoring
- pregnancy
- anatomical malformation that make monitoring using SE sensor impossible
- general atherosclerosis, heart rhythm disturbances impairing SPI monitoring
- chronic medication using opioid drugs leading to resistancy to opioids.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Poland1 site
Medical University of Silesia
Sosnowiec, Silesian Voivodeship, 41-200
About this study
Official title: Influence of Adequacy of Anaesthesia Monitoring on Both Operators' and Patients' Satisfaction in Patients Undergoing Colonoscopic Procedures
The aim of this randomized prospective trial is to assess the utility of Adequacy of Anaesthesia technique (Response Entropy and Surgical Pleth Index) for monitoring pain perception intraoperatively and its influence on postoperative pain perception, both patients' and operators' satisfaction in patients undergoing colonoscopic procedures under intravenous sedation using propofol and fentanyl.
Read the detailed description
Surgical Pleth Index (SPI) is reported to properly reflect nociception-antinociception balance in patients undergoing surgical procedures, where a value of 100 corresponds to a high stress level and a value of 0 to a low stress level; values near 50 or increase in value > delta 10 correspond to the stress level which is known to reflect requirement for rescue analgesia.
The applicability of SPI- guided deep sedation regimen in colonoscopic procedures has not been previously studied. Additionally, depth of sedation markedly influences the nociception-antinociception balance so its monitoring also proved useful in procedures performed under deep sedation.
Therefore, we aim to investigate if both SPI-guided fentanyl administration alongside with State Entropy guided propofol aministration (Adequacy of Anaesthesia monitoring) versus State Entropy guided propofol aministration alongside with fentanyl titration based on haemodynamic parametres versus fentanyl titration based on haemodynamic parametres only influence both patients' or operator's satisfaction from anaesthetic management.
- Conditions
- Colonic Diseases, Functional
- Being tested
- rescue fentanyl, rescue propofol
- Keywords
- Surgical Pleth Index (SPI), Adequacy of Anaesthesia (AoA), State Entropy (SE), Postoperative nausea and vomitting (PONV), Colonoscopy
- Medical subject headings
- Colonic Diseases, Functional, Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
rescue fentanylDrug
Also called rescue analgesia
a rescue dose of fentanyl 0,5 mcg per kilogram of body
rescue propofolDrug
Also called rescue sedation
propofol in a single dose of 0,5 mg/kg of body weight
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| haemodynamic parametres-guided deep sedation | Experimental | propofol will be tirtrated in a single dose of 0,5 mg/kg of body weight to disappearance of cilliary reflex; in the case of heart rate and/or arterial blood pressure increase by 20% a rescue dose of fentanyl 0,5 mcg per kilogram of body weight will be administered Receives: Drug: rescue fentanyl; Drug: rescue propofol |
| SE-guided propofol-fentanyl deep sedation | Experimental | propofol will be tirtrated in a single dose of 0,5 mg/kg of body weight to a target SE < 80 alongside with a rescue dose 0,5 mcg per kilogram of body weight of fentanyl in the case of heart rate and/or arterial blood pressure increase by 20% Receives: Drug: rescue fentanyl; Drug: rescue propofol |
| AoA-guided propofol-fentanyl deep sedation | Experimental | propofol will be tirtrated in a single dose of 0,5 mg/kg of body weight to a target SE < 80 alongside with a rescue dose 0,5 mcg per kilogram of body weightof fentanyl in the case of increase of SPI value > delta 15 Receives: Drug: rescue fentanyl; Drug: rescue propofol |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
intraoperative pain perception: 11 points numeric rating scale
the patient will be asked if he/she had any reminiscence of pain perception during procedure of colonoscopy using 11 points numeric rating scale (0 - no pain, 10 - maximum pain)
Measured: after 2 hours after emergence from sedation
postoperative pain perception: 11 points numeric rating scale
the patient will be asked if he/she had any pain perception after emergence from sedation after procedure of colonoscopy using 11 points numeric rating scale (0 - no pain, 10 - maximum pain)
Measured: immediately after emergence form sedation
Secondary outcomes (2)
patient's satisfaction: 4 points numeric rating scale
the patient will be asked if he/she was satisfied with sedation quality for the procedure of colonoscopy using 4 points numeric scale
Measured: 2 hours after emergence from sedation
operator's satisfaction: 4 points numeric scale
the operator will be asked if he/she was satisfied with sedation quality for the procedure of colonoscopy using 4 points numeric scale
Measured: immediately after the end of the procedure
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Apr 2019
- Study start1 Sep 2019
- Primary completion31 Jan 2020
- Study completion31 Jan 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (7)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Colonic Diseases, FunctionalStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider
- Enrolment
- 158 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Medical University of Silesia
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Michał J Stasiowski, M.D, Principal investigator, Medical University of Silesia
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03922815
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- SilesianMUKOAiIT12
- Acronym
- AoAColon
- Status last verified
- Oct 2018
- First submitted
- 17 Apr 2019
- Last updated
- 23 Oct 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: article in AiIT 2019
Publications
Gruenewald M, Herz J, Schoenherr T, Thee C, Steinfath M, Bein B. Measurement of the nociceptive balance by Analgesia Nociception Index and Surgical Pleth Index during sevoflurane-remifentanil anesthesia. Minerva Anestesiol. 2015 May;81(5):480-9. Epub 2014 Jul 17.
PubMed 25032676Gruenewald M, Ilies C, Herz J, Schoenherr T, Fudickar A, Hocker J, Bein B. Influence of nociceptive stimulation on analgesia nociception index (ANI) during propofol-remifentanil anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2013 Jun;110(6):1024-30. doi: 10.1093/bja/aet019. Epub 2013 Mar 6.
PubMed 23471754Gruenewald M, Ilies C. Monitoring the nociception-anti-nociception balance. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2013 Jun;27(2):235-47. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2013.06.007.
PubMed 24012235Gruenewald M, Willms S, Broch O, Kott M, Steinfath M, Bein B. Sufentanil administration guided by surgical pleth index vs standard practice during sevoflurane anaesthesia: a randomized controlled pilot study. Br J Anaesth. 2014 May;112(5):898-905. doi: 10.1093/bja/aet485. Epub 2014 Feb 16.
PubMed 24535604Won YJ, Lim BG, Lee SH, Park S, Kim H, Lee IO, Kong MH. Comparison of relative oxycodone consumption in surgical pleth index-guided analgesia versus conventional analgesia during sevoflurane anesthesia: A randomized controlled trial. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Aug;95(35):e4743. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000004743.
PubMed 27583920Abu Baker F, Mari A, Aamarney K, Hakeem AR, Ovadia B, Kopelman Y. Propofol sedation in colonoscopy: from satisfied patients to improved quality indicators. Clin Exp Gastroenterol. 2019 Feb 26;12:105-110. doi: 10.2147/CEG.S186393. eCollection 2019.
PubMed 30881077Zhang W, Zhu Z, Zheng Y. Effect and safety of propofol for sedation during colonoscopy: A meta-analysis. J Clin Anesth. 2018 Dec;51:10-18. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2018.07.005. Epub 2018 Jul 27.
PubMed 30059837
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Oct 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Influence of Adequacy of Anaesthesia Monitoring on Both Operators' and Patients' Satisfaction in Patients Undergoing Colonoscopic Procedures
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03922815
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- AoAColon / SilesianMUKOAiIT12
- Conditions
- Colonic Diseases, Functional
- Keywords
- Surgical Pleth Index (SPI), Adequacy of Anaesthesia (AoA), State Entropy (SE), Postoperative nausea and vomitting (PONV), Colonoscopy
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 158 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Medical University of SilesiaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Sep 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Jan 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Jan 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 22 Apr 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of this randomized prospective trial is to assess the utility of Adequacy of Anaesthesia technique (Response Entropy and Surgical Pleth Index) for monitoring pain perception intraoperatively and its influence on postoperative pain perception, both patients' and operators' satisfaction in patients undergoing colonoscopic procedures under intravenous sedation using propofol and fentanyl.
Detailed description
Surgical Pleth Index (SPI) is reported to properly reflect nociception-antinociception balance in patients undergoing surgical procedures, where a value of 100 corresponds to a high stress level and a value of 0 to a low stress level; values near 50 or increase in value > delta 10 correspond to the stress level which is known to reflect requirement for rescue analgesia.
The applicability of SPI- guided deep sedation regimen in colonoscopic procedures has not been previously studied. Additionally, depth of sedation markedly influences the nociception-antinociception balance so its monitoring also proved useful in procedures performed under deep sedation.
Therefore, we aim to investigate if both SPI-guided fentanyl administration alongside with State Entropy guided propofol aministration (Adequacy of Anaesthesia monitoring) versus State Entropy guided propofol aministration alongside with fentanyl titration based on haemodynamic parametres versus fentanyl titration based on haemodynamic parametres only influence both patients' or operator's satisfaction from anaesthetic management.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, care provider)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| haemodynamic parametres-guided deep sedation | Experimental | Drug: rescue fentanyl, Drug: rescue propofolpropofol will be tirtrated in a single dose of 0,5 mg/kg of body weight to disappearance of cilliary reflex; in the case of heart rate and/or arterial blood pressure increase by 20% a rescue dose of fentanyl 0,5 mcg per kilogram of body weight will be administered |
| SE-guided propofol-fentanyl deep sedation | Experimental | Drug: rescue fentanyl, Drug: rescue propofolpropofol will be tirtrated in a single dose of 0,5 mg/kg of body weight to a target SE < 80 alongside with a rescue dose 0,5 mcg per kilogram of body weight of fentanyl in the case of heart rate and/or arterial blood pressure increase by 20% |
| AoA-guided propofol-fentanyl deep sedation | Experimental | Drug: rescue fentanyl, Drug: rescue propofolpropofol will be tirtrated in a single dose of 0,5 mg/kg of body weight to a target SE < 80 alongside with a rescue dose 0,5 mcg per kilogram of body weightof fentanyl in the case of increase of SPI value > delta 15 |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- written consent to participate in the study
- written consent to undergo deep sedation for colonoscopic procedure
- general heath condition I-III of American Society of Anaesthesiology
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- necessity of administration of vasoactive drugs influencing SPI monitoring
- pregnancy
- anatomical malformation that make monitoring using SE sensor impossible
- general atherosclerosis, heart rhythm disturbances impairing SPI monitoring
- chronic medication using opioid drugs leading to resistancy to opioids.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| rescue fentanylAlso: rescue analgesiaa rescue dose of fentanyl 0,5 mcg per kilogram of body | Drug | AoA-guided propofol-fentanyl deep sedation, SE-guided propofol-fentanyl deep sedation, haemodynamic parametres-guided deep sedation |
| rescue propofolAlso: rescue sedationpropofol in a single dose of 0,5 mg/kg of body weight | Drug | AoA-guided propofol-fentanyl deep sedation, SE-guided propofol-fentanyl deep sedation, haemodynamic parametres-guided deep sedation |
Primary outcome
intraoperative pain perception: 11 points numeric rating scale
Time frame: after 2 hours after emergence from sedation
the patient will be asked if he/she had any reminiscence of pain perception during procedure of colonoscopy using 11 points numeric rating scale (0 - no pain, 10 - maximum pain)
postoperative pain perception: 11 points numeric rating scale
Time frame: immediately after emergence form sedation
the patient will be asked if he/she had any pain perception after emergence from sedation after procedure of colonoscopy using 11 points numeric rating scale (0 - no pain, 10 - maximum pain)
2 secondary outcomes
patient's satisfaction: 4 points numeric rating scale
Time frame: 2 hours after emergence from sedation
operator's satisfaction: 4 points numeric scale
Time frame: immediately after the end of the procedure
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Oct 2020.
- Results publication: PubMed 25032676Gruenewald M, Herz J, Schoenherr T, Thee C, Steinfath M, Bein B. Measurement of the nociceptive balance by Analgesia Nociception Index and Surgical Pleth Index during sevoflurane-remifentanil anesthesia. Minerva Anestesiol. 2015 May;81(5):480-9. Epub 2014 Jul 17.
- Results publication: PubMed 23471754Gruenewald M, Ilies C, Herz J, Schoenherr T, Fudickar A, Hocker J, Bein B. Influence of nociceptive stimulation on analgesia nociception index (ANI) during propofol-remifentanil anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2013 Jun;110(6):1024-30. doi: 10.1093/bja/aet019. Epub 2013 Mar 6.
- Results publication: PubMed 24012235Gruenewald M, Ilies C. Monitoring the nociception-anti-nociception balance. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2013 Jun;27(2):235-47. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2013.06.007.
- Results publication: PubMed 24535604Gruenewald M, Willms S, Broch O, Kott M, Steinfath M, Bein B. Sufentanil administration guided by surgical pleth index vs standard practice during sevoflurane anaesthesia: a randomized controlled pilot study. Br J Anaesth. 2014 May;112(5):898-905. doi: 10.1093/bja/aet485. Epub 2014 Feb 16.
- Results publication: PubMed 27583920Won YJ, Lim BG, Lee SH, Park S, Kim H, Lee IO, Kong MH. Comparison of relative oxycodone consumption in surgical pleth index-guided analgesia versus conventional analgesia during sevoflurane anesthesia: A randomized controlled trial. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Aug;95(35):e4743. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000004743.
- Results publication: PubMed 30881077Abu Baker F, Mari A, Aamarney K, Hakeem AR, Ovadia B, Kopelman Y. Propofol sedation in colonoscopy: from satisfied patients to improved quality indicators. Clin Exp Gastroenterol. 2019 Feb 26;12:105-110. doi: 10.2147/CEG.S186393. eCollection 2019.
- Results publication: PubMed 30059837Zhang W, Zhu Z, Zheng Y. Effect and safety of propofol for sedation during colonoscopy: A meta-analysis. J Clin Anesth. 2018 Dec;51:10-18. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2018.07.005. Epub 2018 Jul 27.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. article in AiIT 2019
Related trials for Colonic Diseases, Functional
RecruitingObservational study
Abdominal Symptoms and Rosacea: An Observational Study on the Association Between Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) and the Gut-Skin Axis
IBS (Irritable Bowel Syndrome), Rosacea
Recruiting
Stress Reduction and Lifestyle Modification in Irritable Bowel Syndrome Patients
Irritable Bowel Syndrome
Recruiting
Exercise Interventions and Dietary Advice in Fibromyalgia and IBS
Fibromyalgia, Irritable Bowel Syndrome
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study of Brenipatide (LY3537031) in Participants With Irritable Bowel Syndrome-Constipation (IBS-C)
Irritable Bowel Syndrome, Constipation
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study of Brenipatide (LY3537031) in Participants With Irritable Bowel Syndrome-Diarrhea (IBS-D)
Irritable Bowel Syndrome, Diarrhea
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Michał J Stasiowski, M.D principal investigator
Medical University of Silesia
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing rescue fentanyl and rescue propofol in people with Colonic Diseases, Functional, run by Medical University of Silesia at 1 site in Poland.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Oct 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Poland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
intraoperative pain perception: 11 points numeric rating scale (time frame: after 2 hours after emergence from sedation). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03922815, which also lists 7 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Oct 2020.