Nonradiographic Axial SpondyloarthritisPhase 3BE MOBILE 1NCT03928704
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Bimekizumab in Subjects With Active Nonradiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis
A Phase 3 study testing Bimekizumab in people with Nonradiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis, run by UCB Biopharma SRL at 83 sites in 13 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of the study is to demonstrate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of bimekizumab administered subcutaneously (sc) compared to placebo in the treatment of subjects with active nonradiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Nonradiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis
- What is being tested?
- Bimekizumab
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 274 participants
- Where
- 83 sitesin 13 countries
- Study dates
- 25 Apr 2019to 17 Apr 2023
- Phase
- Phase 3
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Male or female patients at least 18 years of age
- Patient has nonradiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA) with all of the following criteria:
- Adult-onset axial spondyloarthritis meeting Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) classification criteria
- Inflammatory back pain for at least 3 months
- Age at symptom onset of less than 45 years
- NO sacroiliitis (in Anterior-Posterior pelvis or sacroiliac x-ray)
Show all 11Show fewer
- Active disease defined by Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) >=4 AND spinal pain >=4 on a 0 to 10 Numeric Rating Scale
- Objective inflammation defined by sacroiliitis on magnetic resonance imaging and/or elevated C-reactive protein
- Subjects had to have either failed to respond to 2 different nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) given at the maximum tolerated dose for a total of 4 weeks or have a history of intolerance to or a contraindication to NSAID therapy
- Patients who have taken a tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) inhibitor must have experienced an inadequate response or intolerance to treatment given at an approved dose for at least 12 weeks
- Patients currently taking NSAIDs, cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2) inhibitors, analgesics, corticosteroids, methotrexate (MTX), leflunomide (LEF), sulfasalazine (SSZ), hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) AND/OR apremilast can be allowed if they fulfill specific requirements prior to study entry
Who cannot join
- Treatment with more than 1 TNFα inhibitor and/or more than 2 additional non-TNFα biological response modifiers, or any interleukin (IL)-17 biological response modifier
- Active infection or history of recent serious infections
- Viral hepatitis B or C or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection
- Any live (includes attenuated) vaccination within the 8 weeks prior to entering the study or TB (Bacillus Calmette-Guerin) vaccination within 1 year prior entering the study
- Known tuberculosis (TB) infection, at high risk of acquiring TB infection, or current or history of nontuberculous mycobacterium (NTMB) infection
- Subject has any active malignancy or history of malignancy within 5 years prior to the Screening Visit EXCEPT treated and considered cured cutaneous squamous or basal cell carcinoma or in situ cervical cancer
Show all 10Show fewer
- Diagnosis of inflammatory conditions other than axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), including but not limited to psoriatic arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, sarcoidosis, systemic lupus erythematosus, and reactive arthritis. Patients with a diagnosis of Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, or other inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are allowed as long as they have no active symptomatic disease when entering the study
- Presence of active suicidal ideation, or moderately severe major depression or severe major depression
- Female patients who are breastfeeding, pregnant, or planning to become pregnant during the study
- Subject has a history of chronic alcohol or drug abuse within 6 months prior to Screening
Trial locations and contacts
83 sites in 13 countries.
83 sites in 13 countries
United States14 sites
As0010 50057
Dallas, Texas, 75231
As0010 50020
Duncansville, Pennsylvania, 16635
As0010 50015
Hagerstown, Maryland, 21740
As0010 50012
Memphis, Tennessee, 38119-5214
As0010 50131
Mesa, Arizona, 85210
As0010 50036
Mesquite, Texas, 75150
As0010 50059
Ormond Beach, Florida, 32174
As0010 50052
Phoenix, Arizona, 85032
As0010 50055
Portland, Oregon, 97239-3011
As0010 50056
Sarasota, Florida, 34239
As0010 50061
Spokane, Washington, 99204
As0010 50016
St Louis, Missouri, 63141
As0010 50062
Sun City, Arizona, 85351
As0010 50060
Upland, California, 91786
Japan11 sites
As0010 20030
Chūōku
As0010 20039
Iruma-gun
As0010 20036
Kawachi-Nagano
As0010 20045
Kita-gun
As0010 20065
Kitakyushu
As0010 20038
Nankoku-shi
As0010 20037
Osaka
As0010 20084
Saga
As0010 20048
Saitama
As0010 20031
Sapporo
As0010 20035
Tokyo
China9 sites
As0010 20040
Beijing
As0010 20021
Chengdu
As0010 20019
Guangzhou
As0010 20034
Hefei
As0010 20024
Nanjing
As0010 20018
Shanghai
As0010 20020
Shanghai
As0010 20026
Shanghai
As0010 20025
Wenzhou
Czechia8 sites
As0010 40011
Brno
As0010 40009
Pardubice
As0010 40013
Prague
As0010 40014
Prague
As0010 40015
Prague
As0010 40016
Prague
As0010 40010
Uherské Hradiště
As0010 40012
Zlín
Poland8 sites
As0010 40038
Elblag
As0010 40042
Krakow
As0010 40037
Lublin
As0010 40044
Poznan
As0010 40040
Torun
As0010 40041
Warsaw
As0010 40039
Wroclaw
As0010 40043
Wroclaw
Germany6 sites
As0010 40025
Berlin
As0010 40029
Hamburg
As0010 40024
Hanover
As0010 40027
Herne
As0010 40078
Leipzig
As0010 40026
Ratingen
Spain5 sites
As0010 40045
A Coruña
As0010 40046
Córdoba
As0010 40047
Madrid
As0010 40048
Santiago de Compostela
As0010 40049
Seville
Belgium4 sites
As0010 40004
Brussels
As0010 40003
Genk
As0010 40001
Ghent
As0010 40002
Merksem
Bulgaria4 sites
As0010 40006
Plovdiv
As0010 40007
Plovdiv
As0010 40005
Sofia
As0010 40008
Sofia
Hungary4 sites
As0010 40032
Debrecen
As0010 40031
Szeged
As0010 40033
Székesfehérvár
As0010 40080
Szombathely
Turkey (Türkiye)4 sites
As0010 40052
Ankara
As0010 40053
Ankara
As0010 40050
Istanbul
As0010 40051
Izmir
United Kingdom4 sites
As0010 40057
Edinburgh
As0010 40056
Leeds
As0010 40054
London
As0010 40055
Norwich
About this study
Official title: A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Bimekizumab in Subjects With Active Nonradiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis
The purpose of the study is to demonstrate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of bimekizumab administered subcutaneously (sc) compared to placebo in the treatment of subjects with active nonradiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA).
- Conditions
- Nonradiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis
- Being tested
- Bimekizumab, Placebo
- Keywords
- Nonradiographic axial spondyloarthritis, Axial spondyloarthritis, Nr-axSpA, Bimekizumab
- Medical subject headings
- Axial Spondyloarthritis, Non-Radiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
BimekizumabDrug
Also called BKZ, UCB4940
Subjects will receive bimekizumab at pre-specified time-points.
PlaceboOther
Also called PBO
Subjects will receive placebo at pre-specified time-points during the Double-Blind Treatment Period.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Bimekizumab | Experimental | Subjects randomized to this arm will receive bimekizumab during the Double-Blind Treatment Period and the Maintenance Period. Receives: Drug: Bimekizumab |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Subjects randomized to this arm will receive placebo during the Double-Blind Treatment Period and receive bimekizumab during the Maintenance Period. Receives: Drug: Bimekizumab; Other: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Participants With Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society 40% Response Criteria (ASAS40) Response at Week 16
ASAS40 response is defined as relative improvements of at least 40% and absolute improvement of at least 2 units in at least 3 of the 4 following components:1) Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PGADA) assessed on a scale ranging from 0 [not active] to 10 [very active], higher score=higher disease activity, 2) Spinal Pain assessed on a scale ranging from 0 [no pain] to 10 [most severe pain], higher score= higher pain intensity, 3) Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) assessing participant's level of ability on a scale ranging from 0 [easy] to 10 [impossible] on 10 physical activities,4) morning stiffness, assessed as the mean of Q5 (intensity) and Q6 (duration) from the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), each assessed on a scale ranging from 0 [none / 0 hour] to 10 [very severe / 2 or more hours], higher score=higher severity; and no worsening at all in the remaining component.
Measured: Week 16
Secondary outcomes (16)
Percentage of Participants With Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society 40% Response Criteria (ASAS40) Response in TNFα Inhibitor-naïve Subjects at Week 16
ASAS40 response is defined as relative improvements of at least 40% and absolute improvement of at least 2 units in at least 3 of the 4 following components:1) Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PGADA) assessed on a scale ranging from 0 [not active] to 10 [very active], higher score=higher disease activity, 2) Spinal Pain assessed on a scale ranging from 0 [no pain] to 10 [most severe pain], higher score= higher pain intensity, 3) Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) assessing participant's level of ability on a scale ranging from 0 [easy] to 10 [impossible] on 10 physical activities,4) morning stiffness, assessed as the mean of Q5 (intensity) and Q6 (duration) from the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), each assessed on a scale ranging from 0 [none / 0 hour] to 10 [very severe / 2 or more hours], higher score=higher severity; and no worsening at all in the remaining component.
Measured: Week 16
Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) Total Score at Week 16
BASDAI is a well-established patient-reported endpoint assessing severity of AS symptoms. It is made of 6 items assessing severity of fatigue, spinal pain, peripheral joint pain \& swelling, enthesitis, \& morning stiffness (both severity and duration). Each question is rated using a numerical rating scale ranging from 0 (none) to 10 (very severe), higher score=higher symptom severity.BASDAI score is calculated by computing mean of questions 5 and 6 \& adding it to sum of questions 1 to 4.This score is then divided by 5.Total BASDAI score ranges from 0=no disease activity to 10=maximal disease activity, higher score indicates higher symptom severity. A negative change reflects improvement.
Measured: Baseline, Week 16
Percentage of Participants With Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society 20% Response Criteria (ASAS20) Response at Week 16
ASAS20 response is defined as relative improvements of at least 20% and absolute improvement of at least 1 unit in at least 3 of the 4 following components:1) PGADA assessed on a scale ranging from 0 [not active] to 10 [very active], higher score=higher disease activity, 2) Spinal Pain assessed on a scale ranging from 0 [no pain] to 10 [most severe pain], higher score= higher pain intensity, 3) BASFI assessing participant's level of ability on a scale ranging from 0 [easy] to 10 [impossible] on 10 physical activities, 4) morning stiffness, assessed as the mean of Q5 (intensity) and Q6 (duration) from the BASDAI, each assessed on a scale ranging from 0 [none / 0 hour] to 10 [very severe / 2 or more hours], higher score=higher severity; and no worsening at all in the remaining component.
Measured: Week 16
Percentage of Participants With Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) Partial Remission (PR) at Week 16
The Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society partial remission (ASAS-PR) is defined as a score of less than or equal to (<=) 2 units in each of the 4 following components:1) PGADA assessed on a scale ranging from 0 [not active] to 10 [very active], higher score=higher disease activity,2) Spinal Pain assessed on a scale ranging from 0 [no pain] to 10 [most severe pain], higher score= higher pain intensity, 3) BASFI assessing participant's level of ability on a scale ranging from 0 [easy] to 10 [impossible] on 10 physical activities, and 4) morning stiffness, assessed as the mean of Q5 (intensity) and Q6 (duration) from the BASDAI scale, each assessed on a scale ranging from 0 [none / 0 hour] to 10 [very severe / 2 or more hours], higher score=higher severity.
Measured: Week 16
Percentage of Participants With Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score Major Improvement (ASDAS-MI) at Week 16
ASDAS-MI is achieved when there is a reduction (improvement) greater or equal to (>=) 2.0 in ASDAS relative to Baseline. ASDAS is calculated by adding the 5 following components: 1) 0.121 × Neck, back or hip pain (BASDAI Q2), 2) 0.058 × Duration of morning stiffness (BASDAI Q6), 3) 0.110 × Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PGADA), 4) 0.073 × Peripheral pain/swelling in joints (BASDAI Q3), 5) 0.579 × (natural logarithm of the C-reactive protein (CRP) [mg/L] + 1). Q2, Q3 and Q6 from BASDAI and PGADA, are all assessed on a numerical scale from 0 [none / not active] to 10 [very severe / very active]. There is a minimum score of 0.980 for ASDAS (as a fixed value of 2 is assumed for values of hs-CRP below the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ)), but no defined upper score. Higher ASDAS scores reflect higher disease activity and participants achieving ASDAS-MI are considered to have a major improvement in their disease.
Measured: Week 16
Percentage of Participants With Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) 5/6 Response at Week 16
ASAS 5/6 response is defined as achieving at least 20% improvement in 5 of the following 6 components:1) PGADA assessed on a scale ranging from 0 [not active] to 10 [very active], higher score=higher disease activity, 2) Spinal Pain assessed on a scale ranging from 0 [no pain] to 10 [most intense pain], higher score=higher pain intensity,3) BASFI assessing participant's level of ability on a scale ranging from 0 [easy] to 10 [impossible] on 10 physical activities,4) morning stiffness, assessed as the mean of Q5 (intensity) and Q6 (duration) from the BASDAI scale, each assessed on a scale ranging from 0 [none/ 0 hour] to 10 [very severe / 2 or more hours], higher score=higher severity;5) spinal mobility (ie, lateral spinal flexion component of Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Metrology Index) on a scale ranging from 0 [no limitation of movement] to 10 [very severe limitation of movement] and 6) high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP).
Measured: Week 16
Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) at Week 16
The BASFI is a well-established PRO measure of physical functioning used in AxSpA trials. It assesses participants' level of ability during the past week in conducting 10 physical activities on a scale ranging from 0 [easy] to 10 [impossible]. The BASFI score is the mean of the 10 item scores and ranges from 0 to 10, with lower scores indicating better physical function. A negative change in BASFI indicates improvement. The higher the negative value the better the improvement.
Measured: Baseline, Week 16
Change From Baseline in Nocturnal Spinal Pain Score Using Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Week 16
Nocturnal spinal pain experienced by participants with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) was assessed on a numerical rating scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (most severe pain). A lower score indicates less pain and a negative change represents an improvement.
Measured: Baseline, Week 16
Change From Baseline in Ankylosing Spondylitis Quality of Life (ASQoL) Total Score at Week 16
The Ankylosing Spondylitis Quality of Life (ASQoL) is an 18-item PRO measure developed specifically for measuring health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in participants with ankylosing spondylitis and validated in the full spectrum of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). Each item is given a score of 1 for positive responses indicating impaired quality of life, and a score of 0 for negative responses. All item scores are summed to generate the total score ranging from 0 to 18 with a higher score indicating worse HRQoL. A negative change represents an improvement.
Measured: Baseline, Week 16
Change From Baseline in the Short Form 36-Item Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score at Week 16
SF-36 is a 36-item HRQoL instrument with recall period of 4 weeks. Items are grouped into 8 domains: Physical Functioning (10 items), Role Physical (4 items), Bodily Pain (2 items), General Health (5 items), Vitality (4 items), Social Functioning (2 items), Role Emotional (3 items), Mental Health (5 items) and 1 item for Health Transition during last year. PCS and Mental Component Summary (MCS) scores are calculated from 8 domains (excluding Health Transition item). Each of SF-36 derived raw scores range from 0 to 100; higher score = better function. PCS score is calculated from 8 domain scores. It is standardized score ranging from 7.3 to 70.1, with a mean of 50 and SD of 10 in general US population, higher values = better function, and positive change reflects improvement. A PCS score mean below 47 indicates impaired physical functioning. Individual respondent's score that falls outside T-score range of 45 to 55 are outside average general US population range.
Measured: Baseline, Week 16
Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Metrology Index (BASMI) at Week 16
The BASMI characterizes the spinal mobility of participants with axial Spondyloarthritis (SpA) and Ankylosing Spondylitis. It is a disease-specific measure consisting of 5 clinical measures to reflect participant axial status: cervical rotation; tragus to wall distance; lateral lumbar flexion; lumbar flexion (modified Schober test); intermalleolar distance. According to the linear definition of the BASMI a score of 0 to 10 was calculated for each item based on the measurement. The mean of the 5 scores provides the total BASMI score (ranging from 0 to 10). The higher the BASMI score, the more severe the participant's limitation of movement due to their axial SpA. A negative value in BASMI change from Baseline indicates an improvement from Baseline. The higher the negative value, the better the improvement.
Measured: Baseline, Week 16
Change From Baseline in the Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis (MASES) Index in the Subgroup of Participants With Enthesitis at Baseline at Week 16
The Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis is an index that measures the severity (ie, intensity and extent) of enthesitis through the assessment of 13 entheses (bilateral costochondral 1, costochondral 7, anterior superior iliac spine, posterior iliac spine, iliac crest and proximal insertion of the Achilles tendon sites, and the fifth lumbar vertebral body spinous process), each scored as 0 or 1 and then summed for a possible score of 0 to 13. A higher score reflects higher severity and a negative change represents an improvement.
Measured: Baseline, Week 16
Percentage of Participants With Enthesitis-free State at Week 16 Based on the Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis (MASES) Index in the Subgroup of Participants With Enthesitis at Baseline
The Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis is an index that measures the severity (ie, intensity and extent) of enthesitis through the assessment of 13 entheses (bilateral costochondral 1, costochondral 7, anterior superior iliac spine, posterior iliac spine, iliac crest and proximal insertion of the Achilles tendon sites, and the fifth lumbar vertebral body spinous process), each scored as 0 or 1 and then summed for a possible score of 0 to 13. Enthesitis free state is defined as having a MASES score of 0. A higher score reflects higher severity and a negative change represents an improvement.
Measured: Baseline, Week 16
Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During the Study
TEAEs are defined as those AEs that have a start date on or following the first dose of study treatment through the final dose of study treatment + 140 days (covering the 20-week Safety follow up (SFU)). TEAEs were analyzed and have been reported separately for Double-Blind Treatment Period (Safety set),Maintenance Period (MP) (Maintenance Set) and Overall Period (Safety set) which includes all participants who received BKZ 160 mg Q4W during the study. The overall period arm reports repeated TEAEs from the double blind treatment period arm and maintenance period arm. As pre-specified in SAP, Maintenance Period (MP) included AEs of Safety follow up period for participants who did not enter the open label extension or discontinued early in MP.
Measured: From Baseline (Day 1) until Safety-Follow-Up (up to Week 68) (Week 48 last IMP intake + 20 weeks SFU)
Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the Study
A serious adverse event (SAE) is any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose resulted in 1) Death, 2) Life-threatening (Life-threatening does not include a reaction that might have caused death had it occurred in a more severe form.), 3) Significant or persistent disability/incapacity, 4) Congenital anomaly/birth defect (including that occurring in a fetus), 5) Important medical event that, based upon appropriate medical judgment, may jeopardize the participant or participant may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent any of the above, 6) Initial inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization. The overall period arm reports repeated SAEs from the double blind treatment period arm and maintenance period arm. As pre-specified in SAP, MP included SAEs of Safety follow up period for participants who did not enter the open label extension or discontinued early in MP.
Measured: From Baseline (Day 1) until Safety Follow-Up (up to Week 68)
Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Leading to Withdrawal From Investigational Medicinal Product (IMP) During the Study
TEAEs are defined as those AEs that have a start date on or following the first dose of study treatment through the final dose of study treatment + 140 days (covering the 20-week SFU period). The overall period arm reports repeated events from the double blind treatment period arm and maintenance period arm. As pre-specified in SAP, MP included events of Safety follow up period for participants who did not enter the open label extension or discontinued early in MP.
Measured: From Baseline (Day 1) until Safety-Follow-Up (up to Week 68)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 Apr 2019
- Study start25 Apr 2019
- Primary completion29 Jun 2022
- Study completion17 Apr 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (14)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Nonradiographic Axial SpondyloarthritisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by UCB Biopharma SRLThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 274 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- UCB Biopharma SRL
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- UCB Cares, Study director, 001 844 599 2273
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03928704
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- AS0010
- Other IDs
- 2017-003064-13, 2017
- Acronym
- BE MOBILE 1
- Status last verified
- Aug 2026
- First submitted
- 23 Apr 2019
- Last updated
- 25 Sep 2026
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Data from this trial may be requested by qualified researchers six months after product approval in the US and/or Europe, or global development is discontinued, and 18 months after trial completion. Investigators may request access to anonymized individual patient-level data and redacted trial documents which may include: analysis-ready datasets, study protocol, annotated case report form, statistical analysis plan, dataset specifications, and clinical study report. Prior to use of the data, proposals need to be approved by an independent review panel at www.Vivli.org and a signed data sharing agreement will need to be executed. All documents are available in English only, for a prespecified time, typically 12 months, on a password protected portal. This plan may change if the risk of re-identifying trial participants is determined to be too high after the trial is completed; in this case and to protect participants, individual patient-level data would not be made available.
Publications
van der Heijde D, Deodhar A, Baraliakos X, Brown MA, Dobashi H, Dougados M, Elewaut D, Ellis AM, Fleurinck C, Gaffney K, Gensler LS, Haroon N, Magrey M, Maksymowych WP, Marten A, Massow U, Oortgiesen M, Poddubnyy D, Rudwaleit M, Shepherd-Smith J, Tomita T, Van den Bosch F, Vaux T, Xu H. Efficacy and safety of bimekizumab in axial spondyloarthritis: results of two parallel phase 3 randomised controlled trials. Ann Rheum Dis. 2023 Apr;82(4):515-526. doi: 10.1136/ard-2022-223595. Epub 2023 Jan 17.
PubMed 36649967Navarro-Compan V, Ramiro S, Deodhar A, Mease PJ, Rudwaleit M, de la Loge C, Fleurinck C, Taieb V, Morup MF, Massow U, Kay J, Magrey M. Association of clinical response criteria and disease activity levels with axial spondyloarthritis core domains: results from two phase 3 randomised studies, BE MOBILE 1 and 2. RMD Open. 2024 Apr 10;10(2):e004040. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2023-004040.
PubMed 38599650Dubreuil M, Navarro-Compan V, Boonen A, Gaffney K, Gensler LS, de la Loge C, Vaux T, Fleurinck C, Massow U, Taieb V, Morup MF, Deodhar A, Rudwaleit M. Improved physical functioning, sleep, work productivity and overall health-related quality of life with bimekizumab in patients with axial spondyloarthritis: results from two phase 3 studies. RMD Open. 2024 Jun 4;10(2):e004202. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2024-004202.
PubMed 38834351Cella D, de la Loge C, Fofana F, Guo S, Ellis A, Fleurinck C, Massow U, Dougados M, Navarro-Compan V, Walsh JA. The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) scale in patients with axial spondyloarthritis: psychometric properties and clinically meaningful thresholds for interpretation. J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2024 Aug 12;8(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s41687-024-00769-x.
PubMed 39133438Ramiro S, Poddubnyy D, Mease PJ, Lopez-Medina C, Kim M, Massow U, Taieb V, Kragstrup TW, McGonagle D. Sustained resolution of enthesitis and peripheral arthritis over 104 weeks with bimekizumab in axial spondyloarthritis. RMD Open. 2025 Oct 22;11(4):e005969. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2025-005969.
PubMed 41125403Nikiphorou E, Tillett W, Deodhar A, Dubreuil M, Gossec L, Hwang M, Lubrano E, Machado PM, Rudwaleit M, de Wit M, Kavanagh S, de la Loge C, Ink B, Lambert J, Morup M, Boonen A, Walsh J. Effect of Bimekizumab Treatment on Health Status, Work Productivity, and Productivity Costs Through 3 Years in Axial Spondyloarthritis and Psoriatic Arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2026 Aug 1:jrheum.2026-0104. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.2026-0104. Online ahead of print.
PubMed 42386286Rudwaleit M, Ramiro S, Poddubnyy D, Magrey M, van der Horst-Bruinsma IE, Deodhar A, Taieb V, Kavanagh S, de Peyrecave N, Gensler LS. Bimekizumab efficacy in male and female patients with axial spondyloarthritis: 52-week results from the Phase 3 BE MOBILE rials. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2026 Aug 14:keag425. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keag425. Online ahead of print.
PubMed 42605056Baraliakos X, Deodhar A, van der Heijde D, Van den Bosch F, Magrey M, Maksymowych WP, Tomita T, Xu H, Coarse J, Prajapati C, Manente M, Marten A, Gensler LS. Bimekizumab Long-Term Safety and Efficacy Across the Spectrum of Axial Spondyloarthritis Over 3 Years: Results From 2 Phase III Studies. J Rheumatol. 2026 Aug 1:jrheum.2026-0113. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.2026-0113. Online ahead of print.
PubMed 42297437Navarro-Compan V, Kiltz U, Mease PJ, Dubreuil M, Gaffney K, Deodhar A, de la Loge C, Prajapati C, Kavanagh S, Marzo-Ortega H. Bimekizumab treatment for sustained improvements in patient symptoms and health-related quality of life to 3 years in axial spondyloarthritis: results from the BE MOBILE studies and their open-label extension. RMD Open. 2026 May 13;12(2):e006670. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2025-006670.
PubMed 42128532Mease PJ, Merola JF, Magrey M, Nash P, Poddubnyy D, Lebwohl M, Bajracharya R, Ink B, Marten A, Manente M, Peterson L, White K, Gensler LS. Bimekizumab longer-term safety profile in adult patients with axial spondyloarthritis or psoriatic arthritis: an updated analysis of six phase IIb/III clinical studies. RMD Open. 2026 Mar 10;12(1):e006174. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2025-006174.
PubMed 41807031Marzo-Ortega H, Navarro-Compan V, Dubreuil M, Mease PJ, Magrey M, Rudwaleit M, D'Agostino MA, Gaffney K, Kay J, de la Loge C, Massow U, Taieb V, Vaux T, Deodhar A. Sustained improvements in spinal pain, morning stiffness, fatigue, sleep, physical function and overall health-related quality of life with bimekizumab in patients with axial spondyloarthritis: 2-year results from two phase 3 studies. RMD Open. 2025 Nov 28;11(4):e006013. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2025-006013.
PubMed 41314667Mease PJ, Gensler LS, Orbai AM, Warren RB, Bajracharya R, Ink B, Marten A, Massow U, Shende V, Manente M, Peterson L, White K, Landewe R, Poddubnyy D. Long-term safety of bimekizumab in adult patients with axial spondyloarthritis or psoriatic arthritis: pooled results from integrated phase IIb/III clinical studies. RMD Open. 2025 Apr 6;11(2):e005026. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2024-005026.
PubMed 40194794Navarro-Compan V, Rudwaleit M, Dubreuil M, Magrey M, Marzo-Ortega H, Mease PJ, Walsh JA, Dougados M, de la Loge C, Fleurinck C, Massow U, Vaux T, Taieb V, Deodhar A. Improved Pain, Morning Stiffness, and Fatigue With Bimekizumab in Axial Spondyloarthritis: Results From the Phase III BE MOBILE Studies. J Rheumatol. 2025 Jan 1;52(1):23-32. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.2024-0223.
PubMed 39406403Baraliakos X, Deodhar A, van der Heijde D, Magrey M, Maksymowych WP, Tomita T, Xu H, Massow U, Fleurinck C, Ellis AM, Vaux T, Shepherd-Smith J, Marten A, Gensler LS. Bimekizumab treatment in patients with active axial spondyloarthritis: 52-week efficacy and safety from the randomised parallel phase 3 BE MOBILE 1 and BE MOBILE 2 studies. Ann Rheum Dis. 2024 Jan 11;83(2):199-213. doi: 10.1136/ard-2023-224803.
PubMed 37793792