AzTrials
AzTrials

Nonradiographic Axial SpondyloarthritisPhase 3BE MOBILE 1NCT03928704

A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Bimekizumab in Subjects With Active Nonradiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis

A Phase 3 study testing Bimekizumab in people with Nonradiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis, run by UCB Biopharma SRL at 83 sites in 13 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record

Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of the study is to demonstrate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of bimekizumab administered subcutaneously (sc) compared to placebo in the treatment of subjects with active nonradiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Nonradiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis
What is being tested?
Bimekizumab
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
274 participants
Where
83 sitesin 13 countries
Study dates
25 Apr 2019to 17 Apr 2023
Phase
Phase 3

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Male or female patients at least 18 years of age
  • Patient has nonradiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA) with all of the following criteria:
  • Adult-onset axial spondyloarthritis meeting Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) classification criteria
  • Inflammatory back pain for at least 3 months
  • Age at symptom onset of less than 45 years
  • NO sacroiliitis (in Anterior-Posterior pelvis or sacroiliac x-ray)
Show all 11Show fewer
  • Active disease defined by Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) >=4 AND spinal pain >=4 on a 0 to 10 Numeric Rating Scale
  • Objective inflammation defined by sacroiliitis on magnetic resonance imaging and/or elevated C-reactive protein
  • Subjects had to have either failed to respond to 2 different nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) given at the maximum tolerated dose for a total of 4 weeks or have a history of intolerance to or a contraindication to NSAID therapy
  • Patients who have taken a tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) inhibitor must have experienced an inadequate response or intolerance to treatment given at an approved dose for at least 12 weeks
  • Patients currently taking NSAIDs, cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2) inhibitors, analgesics, corticosteroids, methotrexate (MTX), leflunomide (LEF), sulfasalazine (SSZ), hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) AND/OR apremilast can be allowed if they fulfill specific requirements prior to study entry

Who cannot join

  • Treatment with more than 1 TNFα inhibitor and/or more than 2 additional non-TNFα biological response modifiers, or any interleukin (IL)-17 biological response modifier
  • Active infection or history of recent serious infections
  • Viral hepatitis B or C or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection
  • Any live (includes attenuated) vaccination within the 8 weeks prior to entering the study or TB (Bacillus Calmette-Guerin) vaccination within 1 year prior entering the study
  • Known tuberculosis (TB) infection, at high risk of acquiring TB infection, or current or history of nontuberculous mycobacterium (NTMB) infection
  • Subject has any active malignancy or history of malignancy within 5 years prior to the Screening Visit EXCEPT treated and considered cured cutaneous squamous or basal cell carcinoma or in situ cervical cancer
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Diagnosis of inflammatory conditions other than axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), including but not limited to psoriatic arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, sarcoidosis, systemic lupus erythematosus, and reactive arthritis. Patients with a diagnosis of Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, or other inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are allowed as long as they have no active symptomatic disease when entering the study
  • Presence of active suicidal ideation, or moderately severe major depression or severe major depression
  • Female patients who are breastfeeding, pregnant, or planning to become pregnant during the study
  • Subject has a history of chronic alcohol or drug abuse within 6 months prior to Screening

Trial locations and contacts

83 sites in 13 countries.

83 sites in 13 countries

United States14 sites
  • As0010 50057

    Dallas, Texas, 75231

  • As0010 50020

    Duncansville, Pennsylvania, 16635

  • As0010 50015

    Hagerstown, Maryland, 21740

  • As0010 50012

    Memphis, Tennessee, 38119-5214

  • As0010 50131

    Mesa, Arizona, 85210

  • As0010 50036

    Mesquite, Texas, 75150

  • As0010 50059

    Ormond Beach, Florida, 32174

  • As0010 50052

    Phoenix, Arizona, 85032

  • As0010 50055

    Portland, Oregon, 97239-3011

  • As0010 50056

    Sarasota, Florida, 34239

  • As0010 50061

    Spokane, Washington, 99204

  • As0010 50016

    St Louis, Missouri, 63141

  • As0010 50062

    Sun City, Arizona, 85351

  • As0010 50060

    Upland, California, 91786

Other trials in United States

Japan11 sites
  • As0010 20030

    Chūōku

  • As0010 20039

    Iruma-gun

  • As0010 20036

    Kawachi-Nagano

  • As0010 20045

    Kita-gun

  • As0010 20065

    Kitakyushu

  • As0010 20038

    Nankoku-shi

  • As0010 20037

    Osaka

  • As0010 20084

    Saga

  • As0010 20048

    Saitama

  • As0010 20031

    Sapporo

  • As0010 20035

    Tokyo

Other trials in Japan

China9 sites
  • As0010 20040

    Beijing

  • As0010 20021

    Chengdu

  • As0010 20019

    Guangzhou

  • As0010 20034

    Hefei

  • As0010 20024

    Nanjing

  • As0010 20018

    Shanghai

  • As0010 20020

    Shanghai

  • As0010 20026

    Shanghai

  • As0010 20025

    Wenzhou

Other trials in China

Czechia8 sites
  • As0010 40011

    Brno

  • As0010 40009

    Pardubice

  • As0010 40013

    Prague

  • As0010 40014

    Prague

  • As0010 40015

    Prague

  • As0010 40016

    Prague

  • As0010 40010

    Uherské Hradiště

  • As0010 40012

    Zlín

Other trials in Czechia

Poland8 sites
  • As0010 40038

    Elblag

  • As0010 40042

    Krakow

  • As0010 40037

    Lublin

  • As0010 40044

    Poznan

  • As0010 40040

    Torun

  • As0010 40041

    Warsaw

  • As0010 40039

    Wroclaw

  • As0010 40043

    Wroclaw

Other trials in Poland

Germany6 sites
  • As0010 40025

    Berlin

  • As0010 40029

    Hamburg

  • As0010 40024

    Hanover

  • As0010 40027

    Herne

  • As0010 40078

    Leipzig

  • As0010 40026

    Ratingen

Other trials in Germany

Spain5 sites
  • As0010 40045

    A Coruña

  • As0010 40046

    Córdoba

  • As0010 40047

    Madrid

  • As0010 40048

    Santiago de Compostela

  • As0010 40049

    Seville

Other trials in Spain

Belgium4 sites
  • As0010 40004

    Brussels

  • As0010 40003

    Genk

  • As0010 40001

    Ghent

  • As0010 40002

    Merksem

Other trials in Belgium

Bulgaria4 sites
  • As0010 40006

    Plovdiv

  • As0010 40007

    Plovdiv

  • As0010 40005

    Sofia

  • As0010 40008

    Sofia

Other trials in Bulgaria

Hungary4 sites
  • As0010 40032

    Debrecen

  • As0010 40031

    Szeged

  • As0010 40033

    Székesfehérvár

  • As0010 40080

    Szombathely

Other trials in Hungary

Turkey (Türkiye)4 sites
  • As0010 40052

    Ankara

  • As0010 40053

    Ankara

  • As0010 40050

    Istanbul

  • As0010 40051

    Izmir

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

United Kingdom4 sites
  • As0010 40057

    Edinburgh

  • As0010 40056

    Leeds

  • As0010 40054

    London

  • As0010 40055

    Norwich

Other trials in United Kingdom

France2 sites
  • As0010 40018

    Boulogne-Billancourt

  • As0010 40022

    Limoges

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Bimekizumab in Subjects With Active Nonradiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis

The purpose of the study is to demonstrate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of bimekizumab administered subcutaneously (sc) compared to placebo in the treatment of subjects with active nonradiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA).

Being tested
Bimekizumab, Placebo
Keywords
Nonradiographic axial spondyloarthritis, Axial spondyloarthritis, Nr-axSpA, Bimekizumab
Medical subject headings
Axial Spondyloarthritis, Non-Radiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • BimekizumabDrug

    Also called BKZ, UCB4940

    Subjects will receive bimekizumab at pre-specified time-points.

  • PlaceboOther

    Also called PBO

    Subjects will receive placebo at pre-specified time-points during the Double-Blind Treatment Period.

Study groups in NCT03928704
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
BimekizumabExperimentalSubjects randomized to this arm will receive bimekizumab during the Double-Blind Treatment Period and the Maintenance Period.
Receives: Drug: Bimekizumab
PlaceboPlacebo comparatorSubjects randomized to this arm will receive placebo during the Double-Blind Treatment Period and receive bimekizumab during the Maintenance Period.
Receives: Drug: Bimekizumab; Other: Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of Participants With Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society 40% Response Criteria (ASAS40) Response at Week 16

    ASAS40 response is defined as relative improvements of at least 40% and absolute improvement of at least 2 units in at least 3 of the 4 following components:1) Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PGADA) assessed on a scale ranging from 0 [not active] to 10 [very active], higher score=higher disease activity, 2) Spinal Pain assessed on a scale ranging from 0 [no pain] to 10 [most severe pain], higher score= higher pain intensity, 3) Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) assessing participant's level of ability on a scale ranging from 0 [easy] to 10 [impossible] on 10 physical activities,4) morning stiffness, assessed as the mean of Q5 (intensity) and Q6 (duration) from the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), each assessed on a scale ranging from 0 [none / 0 hour] to 10 [very severe / 2 or more hours], higher score=higher severity; and no worsening at all in the remaining component.

    Measured: Week 16

Secondary outcomes (16)
  1. Percentage of Participants With Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society 40% Response Criteria (ASAS40) Response in TNFα Inhibitor-naïve Subjects at Week 16

    ASAS40 response is defined as relative improvements of at least 40% and absolute improvement of at least 2 units in at least 3 of the 4 following components:1) Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PGADA) assessed on a scale ranging from 0 [not active] to 10 [very active], higher score=higher disease activity, 2) Spinal Pain assessed on a scale ranging from 0 [no pain] to 10 [most severe pain], higher score= higher pain intensity, 3) Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) assessing participant's level of ability on a scale ranging from 0 [easy] to 10 [impossible] on 10 physical activities,4) morning stiffness, assessed as the mean of Q5 (intensity) and Q6 (duration) from the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), each assessed on a scale ranging from 0 [none / 0 hour] to 10 [very severe / 2 or more hours], higher score=higher severity; and no worsening at all in the remaining component.

    Measured: Week 16

  2. Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) Total Score at Week 16

    BASDAI is a well-established patient-reported endpoint assessing severity of AS symptoms. It is made of 6 items assessing severity of fatigue, spinal pain, peripheral joint pain \& swelling, enthesitis, \& morning stiffness (both severity and duration). Each question is rated using a numerical rating scale ranging from 0 (none) to 10 (very severe), higher score=higher symptom severity.BASDAI score is calculated by computing mean of questions 5 and 6 \& adding it to sum of questions 1 to 4.This score is then divided by 5.Total BASDAI score ranges from 0=no disease activity to 10=maximal disease activity, higher score indicates higher symptom severity. A negative change reflects improvement.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 16

  3. Percentage of Participants With Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society 20% Response Criteria (ASAS20) Response at Week 16

    ASAS20 response is defined as relative improvements of at least 20% and absolute improvement of at least 1 unit in at least 3 of the 4 following components:1) PGADA assessed on a scale ranging from 0 [not active] to 10 [very active], higher score=higher disease activity, 2) Spinal Pain assessed on a scale ranging from 0 [no pain] to 10 [most severe pain], higher score= higher pain intensity, 3) BASFI assessing participant's level of ability on a scale ranging from 0 [easy] to 10 [impossible] on 10 physical activities, 4) morning stiffness, assessed as the mean of Q5 (intensity) and Q6 (duration) from the BASDAI, each assessed on a scale ranging from 0 [none / 0 hour] to 10 [very severe / 2 or more hours], higher score=higher severity; and no worsening at all in the remaining component.

    Measured: Week 16

  4. Percentage of Participants With Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) Partial Remission (PR) at Week 16

    The Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society partial remission (ASAS-PR) is defined as a score of less than or equal to (<=) 2 units in each of the 4 following components:1) PGADA assessed on a scale ranging from 0 [not active] to 10 [very active], higher score=higher disease activity,2) Spinal Pain assessed on a scale ranging from 0 [no pain] to 10 [most severe pain], higher score= higher pain intensity, 3) BASFI assessing participant's level of ability on a scale ranging from 0 [easy] to 10 [impossible] on 10 physical activities, and 4) morning stiffness, assessed as the mean of Q5 (intensity) and Q6 (duration) from the BASDAI scale, each assessed on a scale ranging from 0 [none / 0 hour] to 10 [very severe / 2 or more hours], higher score=higher severity.

    Measured: Week 16

  5. Percentage of Participants With Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score Major Improvement (ASDAS-MI) at Week 16

    ASDAS-MI is achieved when there is a reduction (improvement) greater or equal to (>=) 2.0 in ASDAS relative to Baseline. ASDAS is calculated by adding the 5 following components: 1) 0.121 × Neck, back or hip pain (BASDAI Q2), 2) 0.058 × Duration of morning stiffness (BASDAI Q6), 3) 0.110 × Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PGADA), 4) 0.073 × Peripheral pain/swelling in joints (BASDAI Q3), 5) 0.579 × (natural logarithm of the C-reactive protein (CRP) [mg/L] + 1). Q2, Q3 and Q6 from BASDAI and PGADA, are all assessed on a numerical scale from 0 [none / not active] to 10 [very severe / very active]. There is a minimum score of 0.980 for ASDAS (as a fixed value of 2 is assumed for values of hs-CRP below the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ)), but no defined upper score. Higher ASDAS scores reflect higher disease activity and participants achieving ASDAS-MI are considered to have a major improvement in their disease.

    Measured: Week 16

  6. Percentage of Participants With Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) 5/6 Response at Week 16

    ASAS 5/6 response is defined as achieving at least 20% improvement in 5 of the following 6 components:1) PGADA assessed on a scale ranging from 0 [not active] to 10 [very active], higher score=higher disease activity, 2) Spinal Pain assessed on a scale ranging from 0 [no pain] to 10 [most intense pain], higher score=higher pain intensity,3) BASFI assessing participant's level of ability on a scale ranging from 0 [easy] to 10 [impossible] on 10 physical activities,4) morning stiffness, assessed as the mean of Q5 (intensity) and Q6 (duration) from the BASDAI scale, each assessed on a scale ranging from 0 [none/ 0 hour] to 10 [very severe / 2 or more hours], higher score=higher severity;5) spinal mobility (ie, lateral spinal flexion component of Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Metrology Index) on a scale ranging from 0 [no limitation of movement] to 10 [very severe limitation of movement] and 6) high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP).

    Measured: Week 16

  7. Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) at Week 16

    The BASFI is a well-established PRO measure of physical functioning used in AxSpA trials. It assesses participants' level of ability during the past week in conducting 10 physical activities on a scale ranging from 0 [easy] to 10 [impossible]. The BASFI score is the mean of the 10 item scores and ranges from 0 to 10, with lower scores indicating better physical function. A negative change in BASFI indicates improvement. The higher the negative value the better the improvement.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 16

  8. Change From Baseline in Nocturnal Spinal Pain Score Using Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Week 16

    Nocturnal spinal pain experienced by participants with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) was assessed on a numerical rating scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (most severe pain). A lower score indicates less pain and a negative change represents an improvement.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 16

  9. Change From Baseline in Ankylosing Spondylitis Quality of Life (ASQoL) Total Score at Week 16

    The Ankylosing Spondylitis Quality of Life (ASQoL) is an 18-item PRO measure developed specifically for measuring health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in participants with ankylosing spondylitis and validated in the full spectrum of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). Each item is given a score of 1 for positive responses indicating impaired quality of life, and a score of 0 for negative responses. All item scores are summed to generate the total score ranging from 0 to 18 with a higher score indicating worse HRQoL. A negative change represents an improvement.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 16

  10. Change From Baseline in the Short Form 36-Item Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score at Week 16

    SF-36 is a 36-item HRQoL instrument with recall period of 4 weeks. Items are grouped into 8 domains: Physical Functioning (10 items), Role Physical (4 items), Bodily Pain (2 items), General Health (5 items), Vitality (4 items), Social Functioning (2 items), Role Emotional (3 items), Mental Health (5 items) and 1 item for Health Transition during last year. PCS and Mental Component Summary (MCS) scores are calculated from 8 domains (excluding Health Transition item). Each of SF-36 derived raw scores range from 0 to 100; higher score = better function. PCS score is calculated from 8 domain scores. It is standardized score ranging from 7.3 to 70.1, with a mean of 50 and SD of 10 in general US population, higher values = better function, and positive change reflects improvement. A PCS score mean below 47 indicates impaired physical functioning. Individual respondent's score that falls outside T-score range of 45 to 55 are outside average general US population range.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 16

  11. Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Metrology Index (BASMI) at Week 16

    The BASMI characterizes the spinal mobility of participants with axial Spondyloarthritis (SpA) and Ankylosing Spondylitis. It is a disease-specific measure consisting of 5 clinical measures to reflect participant axial status: cervical rotation; tragus to wall distance; lateral lumbar flexion; lumbar flexion (modified Schober test); intermalleolar distance. According to the linear definition of the BASMI a score of 0 to 10 was calculated for each item based on the measurement. The mean of the 5 scores provides the total BASMI score (ranging from 0 to 10). The higher the BASMI score, the more severe the participant's limitation of movement due to their axial SpA. A negative value in BASMI change from Baseline indicates an improvement from Baseline. The higher the negative value, the better the improvement.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 16

  12. Change From Baseline in the Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis (MASES) Index in the Subgroup of Participants With Enthesitis at Baseline at Week 16

    The Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis is an index that measures the severity (ie, intensity and extent) of enthesitis through the assessment of 13 entheses (bilateral costochondral 1, costochondral 7, anterior superior iliac spine, posterior iliac spine, iliac crest and proximal insertion of the Achilles tendon sites, and the fifth lumbar vertebral body spinous process), each scored as 0 or 1 and then summed for a possible score of 0 to 13. A higher score reflects higher severity and a negative change represents an improvement.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 16

  13. Percentage of Participants With Enthesitis-free State at Week 16 Based on the Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis (MASES) Index in the Subgroup of Participants With Enthesitis at Baseline

    The Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis is an index that measures the severity (ie, intensity and extent) of enthesitis through the assessment of 13 entheses (bilateral costochondral 1, costochondral 7, anterior superior iliac spine, posterior iliac spine, iliac crest and proximal insertion of the Achilles tendon sites, and the fifth lumbar vertebral body spinous process), each scored as 0 or 1 and then summed for a possible score of 0 to 13. Enthesitis free state is defined as having a MASES score of 0. A higher score reflects higher severity and a negative change represents an improvement.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 16

  14. Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During the Study

    TEAEs are defined as those AEs that have a start date on or following the first dose of study treatment through the final dose of study treatment + 140 days (covering the 20-week Safety follow up (SFU)). TEAEs were analyzed and have been reported separately for Double-Blind Treatment Period (Safety set),Maintenance Period (MP) (Maintenance Set) and Overall Period (Safety set) which includes all participants who received BKZ 160 mg Q4W during the study. The overall period arm reports repeated TEAEs from the double blind treatment period arm and maintenance period arm. As pre-specified in SAP, Maintenance Period (MP) included AEs of Safety follow up period for participants who did not enter the open label extension or discontinued early in MP.

    Measured: From Baseline (Day 1) until Safety-Follow-Up (up to Week 68) (Week 48 last IMP intake + 20 weeks SFU)

  15. Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the Study

    A serious adverse event (SAE) is any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose resulted in 1) Death, 2) Life-threatening (Life-threatening does not include a reaction that might have caused death had it occurred in a more severe form.), 3) Significant or persistent disability/incapacity, 4) Congenital anomaly/birth defect (including that occurring in a fetus), 5) Important medical event that, based upon appropriate medical judgment, may jeopardize the participant or participant may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent any of the above, 6) Initial inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization. The overall period arm reports repeated SAEs from the double blind treatment period arm and maintenance period arm. As pre-specified in SAP, MP included SAEs of Safety follow up period for participants who did not enter the open label extension or discontinued early in MP.

    Measured: From Baseline (Day 1) until Safety Follow-Up (up to Week 68)

  16. Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Leading to Withdrawal From Investigational Medicinal Product (IMP) During the Study

    TEAEs are defined as those AEs that have a start date on or following the first dose of study treatment through the final dose of study treatment + 140 days (covering the 20-week SFU period). The overall period arm reports repeated events from the double blind treatment period arm and maintenance period arm. As pre-specified in SAP, MP included events of Safety follow up period for participants who did not enter the open label extension or discontinued early in MP.

    Measured: From Baseline (Day 1) until Safety-Follow-Up (up to Week 68)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted26 Apr 2019
  2. Study start25 Apr 2019
  3. Primary completion29 Jun 2022
  4. Study completion17 Apr 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
274 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03928704
Sponsor's protocol ID
AS0010
Other IDs
2017-003064-13, 2017
Acronym
BE MOBILE 1
Status last verified
Aug 2026
First submitted
23 Apr 2019
Last updated
25 Sep 2026
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Data from this trial may be requested by qualified researchers six months after product approval in the US and/or Europe, or global development is discontinued, and 18 months after trial completion. Investigators may request access to anonymized individual patient-level data and redacted trial documents which may include: analysis-ready datasets, study protocol, annotated case report form, statistical analysis plan, dataset specifications, and clinical study report. Prior to use of the data, proposals need to be approved by an independent review panel at www.Vivli.org and a signed data sharing agreement will need to be executed. All documents are available in English only, for a prespecified time, typically 12 months, on a password protected portal. This plan may change if the risk of re-identifying trial participants is determined to be too high after the trial is completed; in this case and to protect participants, individual patient-level data would not be made available.

Publications

  • van der Heijde D, Deodhar A, Baraliakos X, Brown MA, Dobashi H, Dougados M, Elewaut D, Ellis AM, Fleurinck C, Gaffney K, Gensler LS, Haroon N, Magrey M, Maksymowych WP, Marten A, Massow U, Oortgiesen M, Poddubnyy D, Rudwaleit M, Shepherd-Smith J, Tomita T, Van den Bosch F, Vaux T, Xu H. Efficacy and safety of bimekizumab in axial spondyloarthritis: results of two parallel phase 3 randomised controlled trials. Ann Rheum Dis. 2023 Apr;82(4):515-526. doi: 10.1136/ard-2022-223595. Epub 2023 Jan 17.

    PubMed 36649967
  • Navarro-Compan V, Ramiro S, Deodhar A, Mease PJ, Rudwaleit M, de la Loge C, Fleurinck C, Taieb V, Morup MF, Massow U, Kay J, Magrey M. Association of clinical response criteria and disease activity levels with axial spondyloarthritis core domains: results from two phase 3 randomised studies, BE MOBILE 1 and 2. RMD Open. 2024 Apr 10;10(2):e004040. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2023-004040.

    PubMed 38599650
  • Dubreuil M, Navarro-Compan V, Boonen A, Gaffney K, Gensler LS, de la Loge C, Vaux T, Fleurinck C, Massow U, Taieb V, Morup MF, Deodhar A, Rudwaleit M. Improved physical functioning, sleep, work productivity and overall health-related quality of life with bimekizumab in patients with axial spondyloarthritis: results from two phase 3 studies. RMD Open. 2024 Jun 4;10(2):e004202. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2024-004202.

    PubMed 38834351
  • Cella D, de la Loge C, Fofana F, Guo S, Ellis A, Fleurinck C, Massow U, Dougados M, Navarro-Compan V, Walsh JA. The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) scale in patients with axial spondyloarthritis: psychometric properties and clinically meaningful thresholds for interpretation. J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2024 Aug 12;8(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s41687-024-00769-x.

    PubMed 39133438
  • Ramiro S, Poddubnyy D, Mease PJ, Lopez-Medina C, Kim M, Massow U, Taieb V, Kragstrup TW, McGonagle D. Sustained resolution of enthesitis and peripheral arthritis over 104 weeks with bimekizumab in axial spondyloarthritis. RMD Open. 2025 Oct 22;11(4):e005969. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2025-005969.

    PubMed 41125403
  • Nikiphorou E, Tillett W, Deodhar A, Dubreuil M, Gossec L, Hwang M, Lubrano E, Machado PM, Rudwaleit M, de Wit M, Kavanagh S, de la Loge C, Ink B, Lambert J, Morup M, Boonen A, Walsh J. Effect of Bimekizumab Treatment on Health Status, Work Productivity, and Productivity Costs Through 3 Years in Axial Spondyloarthritis and Psoriatic Arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2026 Aug 1:jrheum.2026-0104. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.2026-0104. Online ahead of print.

    PubMed 42386286
  • Rudwaleit M, Ramiro S, Poddubnyy D, Magrey M, van der Horst-Bruinsma IE, Deodhar A, Taieb V, Kavanagh S, de Peyrecave N, Gensler LS. Bimekizumab efficacy in male and female patients with axial spondyloarthritis: 52-week results from the Phase 3 BE MOBILE rials. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2026 Aug 14:keag425. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keag425. Online ahead of print.

    PubMed 42605056
  • Baraliakos X, Deodhar A, van der Heijde D, Van den Bosch F, Magrey M, Maksymowych WP, Tomita T, Xu H, Coarse J, Prajapati C, Manente M, Marten A, Gensler LS. Bimekizumab Long-Term Safety and Efficacy Across the Spectrum of Axial Spondyloarthritis Over 3 Years: Results From 2 Phase III Studies. J Rheumatol. 2026 Aug 1:jrheum.2026-0113. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.2026-0113. Online ahead of print.

    PubMed 42297437
  • Navarro-Compan V, Kiltz U, Mease PJ, Dubreuil M, Gaffney K, Deodhar A, de la Loge C, Prajapati C, Kavanagh S, Marzo-Ortega H. Bimekizumab treatment for sustained improvements in patient symptoms and health-related quality of life to 3 years in axial spondyloarthritis: results from the BE MOBILE studies and their open-label extension. RMD Open. 2026 May 13;12(2):e006670. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2025-006670.

    PubMed 42128532
  • Mease PJ, Merola JF, Magrey M, Nash P, Poddubnyy D, Lebwohl M, Bajracharya R, Ink B, Marten A, Manente M, Peterson L, White K, Gensler LS. Bimekizumab longer-term safety profile in adult patients with axial spondyloarthritis or psoriatic arthritis: an updated analysis of six phase IIb/III clinical studies. RMD Open. 2026 Mar 10;12(1):e006174. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2025-006174.

    PubMed 41807031
  • Marzo-Ortega H, Navarro-Compan V, Dubreuil M, Mease PJ, Magrey M, Rudwaleit M, D'Agostino MA, Gaffney K, Kay J, de la Loge C, Massow U, Taieb V, Vaux T, Deodhar A. Sustained improvements in spinal pain, morning stiffness, fatigue, sleep, physical function and overall health-related quality of life with bimekizumab in patients with axial spondyloarthritis: 2-year results from two phase 3 studies. RMD Open. 2025 Nov 28;11(4):e006013. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2025-006013.

    PubMed 41314667
  • Mease PJ, Gensler LS, Orbai AM, Warren RB, Bajracharya R, Ink B, Marten A, Massow U, Shende V, Manente M, Peterson L, White K, Landewe R, Poddubnyy D. Long-term safety of bimekizumab in adult patients with axial spondyloarthritis or psoriatic arthritis: pooled results from integrated phase IIb/III clinical studies. RMD Open. 2025 Apr 6;11(2):e005026. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2024-005026.

    PubMed 40194794
  • Navarro-Compan V, Rudwaleit M, Dubreuil M, Magrey M, Marzo-Ortega H, Mease PJ, Walsh JA, Dougados M, de la Loge C, Fleurinck C, Massow U, Vaux T, Taieb V, Deodhar A. Improved Pain, Morning Stiffness, and Fatigue With Bimekizumab in Axial Spondyloarthritis: Results From the Phase III BE MOBILE Studies. J Rheumatol. 2025 Jan 1;52(1):23-32. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.2024-0223.

    PubMed 39406403
  • Baraliakos X, Deodhar A, van der Heijde D, Magrey M, Maksymowych WP, Tomita T, Xu H, Massow U, Fleurinck C, Ellis AM, Vaux T, Shepherd-Smith J, Marten A, Gensler LS. Bimekizumab treatment in patients with active axial spondyloarthritis: 52-week efficacy and safety from the randomised parallel phase 3 BE MOBILE 1 and BE MOBILE 2 studies. Ann Rheum Dis. 2024 Jan 11;83(2):199-213. doi: 10.1136/ard-2023-224803.

    PubMed 37793792

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in