AzTrials
AzTrials

Urinary Tract InfectionsATB-IUNCT03928951

General Practitioner Reassessment of Urinary Infection Antibiotherapy Prescribed by Emergency Departments

An observational study of Urinary Tract Infections, run by Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Toulon La Seyne sur Mer at 1 site in France.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Urinary infections are at the origin of many emergency department consultations and antibiotic prescriptions. Increase of bacteria resistance to antibiotics is promoted by an inappropriate use of those antibiotics but initial prescription in emergency departments is complicated by brief clinical examinations… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Urinary Tract Infections
What is being tested?
General practitioner reassessment of urinary infection antibiotherapy prescribed by emergency departments
How many people
50 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
14 Jun 2019to 12 Sep 2019
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients consulting in emergency departments of Toulon La Seyne sur Mer hospital because of a urinary infection and to whom antibiotherapy is prescribed

Who may be able to join

  • Every patient more than 18 years who was administered antibiotherapy for urinary infection in emergency department or for whom urinary infection was diagnosed in emergency department (cystitis, acute pyelonephritis, prostatitis)

Who cannot join

  • Patients less than 18 years old
  • Patients opposed to their data use
  • Patients hospitalized more than 24 hours
  • Patients taking antibiotherapy already before their arrival in emergency department
  • Patients without sufficient reading capacities or understanding of french language to express opposition to their research participation
  • Any other reason which, according to investigator, might interfere with research objective evaluation

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

France1 site
  • Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal Toulon - La Seyne sur Mer

    Toulon, Var, 83056

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: General Practitioner Reassessment of the Antibiotherapy of Urinary Infections Initially Treated in Emergency Departments

Urinary infections are at the origin of many emergency department consultations and antibiotic prescriptions. Increase of bacteria resistance to antibiotics is promoted by an inappropriate use of those antibiotics but initial prescription in emergency departments is complicated by brief clinical examinations, unavailable sampling results and risks of multi-resistant bacteria. Large diffusion of new recommendations for urinary infection management should improve the quality of initial antibiotic prescription. However emergency physicians have no knowledge of the reassessment of antibiotherapy 48 to 72 hours after initial prescription by general practitioners which is a quality criterion of good antibiotic use. The main purpose of this study is to estimate the reassessment rate by general practitioners of the urinary infection antibiotherapies prescribed in emergency departments. This will allow assessing the quality of initial antibiotic prescription and help to improve practices.

Read the detailed description

Urinary infections are at the origin of many emergency department consultations and antibiotic prescriptions. Increase of bacteria resistance to antibiotics is promoted by an inappropriate use of those antibiotics but initial prescription in emergency departments is complicated by brief clinical examinations, unavailable sampling results and risks of multi-resistant bacteria. Large diffusion of new recommendations for urinary infection management should improve the quality of initial antibiotic prescription. However emergency physicians have no knowledge of the reassessment of antibiotherapy 48 to 72 hours after initial prescription by general practitioners which is a quality criterion of good antibiotic use. The main purpose of this study is to estimate the reassessment rate by general practitioners of the urinary infection antibiotherapies prescribed in emergency departments.

Patients will be informed during their consultation in one of Toulon - La Seyne sur Mer hospital emergency departments. If they don't express opposition to their data collection, they will be included. A form will then be completed by emergency physicians with initial prescribed antibiotherapy, patients' general practitioners contact information and if patients have a shared medical file or not. 4 to 5 days later, patients' general practitioners will be contacted to know if urinary analysis results were transferred from emergency department to practitioners, if antibiotherapy was modified and if patients' shared medical file was consulted.

Being tested
General practitioner reassessment of urinary infection antibiotherapy prescribed by emergency departments
Keywords
Urinary infections, Antibiotherapy, Emergency, Reassessment
Medical subject headings
Urinary Tract Infections, Emergencies

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • General practitioner reassessment of urinary infection antibiotherapy prescribed by emergency departmentsOther

    Antibiotherapy will be prescribed by emergency physicians and general practitioners will be contacted 4 to 5 days later to know if antibiotherapy was modified

Study groups in NCT03928951
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Patients suffering from urinary infectionPatients consulting in one of Toulon - La Seyne sur Mer hospital emergency departments because of urinary infection
Receives: Other: General practitioner reassessment of urinary infection antibiotherapy prescribed by emergency departments

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Rate of antibiotherapies modified by general practitioners

    Number of antibiotic prescriptions modified by general practitioners divided by the total number of initial antibiotic prescriptions

    Measured: 6 months

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Rate of initial antibiotherapies not relevant to recommendations

    Number of initial antibiotic prescriptions not relevant to recommendations divided by the total number of initial antibiotic prescriptions

    Measured: 6 months

  2. Rate of initial antibiotherapies not consistent with recommendations

    Number of initial antibiotic prescriptions not consistent (molecule, dose, period of time) with recommendations divided by the total number of initial antibiotic prescriptions

    Measured: 6 months

  3. Rate of reassessments not relevant to recommendations

    Number of antibiotic prescription modifications not relevant to recommendations divided by the total number of antibiotic prescription modifications

    Measured: 6 months

  4. Rate of reassessments not consistent with recommendations

    Number of antibiotic prescription modifications not consistent (molecule, dose, period of time) with recommendations divided by the total number of antibiotic prescription modifications

    Measured: 6 months

  5. Frequence of use of shared medical file

    Number of patients for which the shared medical file is used divided by the total number of patients enrolled

    Measured: 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted26 Apr 2019
  2. Study start14 Jun 2019
  3. Primary completion12 Sep 2019
  4. Study completion12 Sep 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
50 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03928951
Sponsor's protocol ID
2019-CHITS-01
Acronym
ATB-IU
Status last verified
Nov 2019
First submitted
24 Apr 2019
Last updated
29 Nov 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Urinary Tract Infections, run by Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Toulon La Seyne sur Mer at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Nov 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Rate of antibiotherapies modified by general practitioners (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Nov 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in