Gastric CancerIG-MIGNCT03931044
Fluorescence Image-Guided Lymphadenectomy in Robotic Gastrectomy
A study testing Image-Guided Robotic Gastrectomy in people with Gastric Cancer and Sentinel Lymph Node, run by International Study Group on Minimally Invasive Surgery for Gastric Cancer at 2 sites in Italy.
Trial summary
Gastric cancer is a worldwide challenge due to its spread, even epidemic in some areas, and the high mortality rates. Lymphadenectomy is considered the fundamental step during radical gastrectomy. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age
- Conditions the study is for
- Gastric Cancer, Sentinel Lymph Node
- What is being tested?
- Image-Guided Robotic Gastrectomy
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 40 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesItaly
- Study dates
- Apr 2019to Jun 2020
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- diagnosis of gastric cancer proved through the endoscopic biopsy
- cT1 - cT3
- cN0
Who cannot join
- history of allergies related to iodine
- pregnancy
- cT4,
- cN +
- distant metastases
- estimated sizes > 4cm
- synchronous malignant tumors in other organs
- ASA score ≥ 4
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
Italy2 sites, 2 recruiting
- Not yet recruiting
Ospedale di Forlì "G.B. Morgagni" - AUSL della Romagna - U.O.C. di Chirurgia e Terapie Oncologiche Avanzate
Forlì, 47121
Davide Cavaliere, MD, cavalied@gmail.com
- Recruiting
Azienda Ospedaliera di Terni "Santa Maria" - S.C. di Chirurgia Digestiva
Terni, 05100
Jacopo Desiderio, MD, +393497531121, j.desiderio@aospetrni.it
About this study
Official title: Fluorescence Image-Guided Lymphadenectomy Using Indocyanine Green and Near Infrared Technology in Robotic Gastrectomy
Gastric cancer is a worldwide challenge due to its spread, even epidemic in some areas, and the high mortality rates. Lymphadenectomy is considered the fundamental step during radical gastrectomy. In recent years, some researchers have tried to find a way to improve the surgical identification of the lymphatic drainage routes and lymph node stations. This new surgical frontier is the so called "navigation surgery". Among the different reported solutions, lately, the indocyanine green (ICG) has drawn attention. It is a fluorescence dye, that can be detected in the near infrared spectral band (NIR). The development of specific fluorescence imaging devices has allowed surgeons to visualize tumors, vascular and lymphatic structures. The Da Vinci Xi robotic system has an integrated imaging technology that has been used in colo-rectal and hepato-biliary surgery. However, up to date, the combined use of fluorescence imaging and robotic technology has not been evaluated during lymphadenectomy in gastric cancer.
The general design of the present study is to evaluate the role of fluorescence imaging during robotic lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer.
Read the detailed description
Background Gastric cancer is the fourth most widespread cancer in the world and is characterized by high mortality rates [1, 2]. A multidisciplinary context, in which surgery plays the main role, is essential to offer the best therapeutic strategy. Lymph node involvement in gastric cancer is present in 2-18% when the depth of the tumor invasion is limited to the mucosal or submucosal layer, but rises to 50% when the tumor involves the subserosa [3]. Lymphadenectomy is a fundamental surgical phase that must guarantee the oncological radicality and allow an appropriate tumor staging. Although it is among the most relevant factors influencing long-term survival, its extension and standardization is still the subject of much debate. The two latest editions of the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association (JGCA) guidelines [4] recommend a dissection on different levels (D1, D1 +, D2) depending on the type of gastrectomy and the clinical stage of the tumor. In recent years, some researchers have tried to apply the concept of "sentinel lymph node" to gastric cancer [5-7]. Although some do not consider that terminology the appropriate one in the context of gastric cancer, because of the multidirectional gastric lymphatic flows, several studies have highlighted interesting aspects, such as: limiting an extensive lymphatic dissection when not necessary, identifying the drainage routes outside the standard anatomical planes, possible assistance in minimally invasive procedures [8]. Most of the experiences in lymph nodes mapping were performed with a radio-isotope (Tc99m) associated or not with the intraoperative use of vital dyes (Blue dye). More recently, the properties of the ICG have been studied. This is a fluorescence dye, that can be detected in the NIR [9, 10]. The development of imaging tools using "NIR / ICG" technology is therefore an innovative approach for visualizing tumors, vascular structures, lymphatic channels, and lymph nodes [11]. Some advantages of the ICG are: reduced toxicity, absence of radioactivity, low cost, safe administration both intravenously and endoscopically through the submucosa or subserosa, protein binding without changing molecular structures, macrophages interaction at the lymph node level. Devices for fluorescence imaging are currently available in both open and minimally invasive surgery.
In this field, robotic surgery has been becoming of great interest thanks to the manufacturing of new instruments which, compared to laparoscopy, allow to improve manual skills and gentleness in challenging movements [12]. The Da Vinci Xi robotic system has also produced an innovative imaging technology for ICG visualization made up with a laser source integrated in the robotic camera (Firefly). The surgeon at the console has therefore a 3-D vision that can switch to the fluorescence mode without the need to change the camera. Few clinical experiences have been reported to date [12]. Published articles refer to assistance in colo-rectal and hepato-biliary surgery for vessels or biliary structures visualization, while its use during lymph node dissection for gastric cancer has not yet been the subject of study protocols.
Hypothesis: fluorescence imaging during lymphadenectomy in gastric cancer can significantly improve the quality of the dissection through a better visualization of anatomical planes and allow tailored dissections. Moreover, the tumor status in the fluorescent nodes could predict the nodes status in the overall specimen with high accuracy rate.
Methods General study design: the overall objective is verifying the feasibility and the role of a lymphadenectomy assisted by fluorescence imaging during robotic gastrectomy.
Two levels of investigation are planned:
- to detect the possible advantages of a fluorescence-guided surgery ("Navigation Surgery");
- to evaluate the possibility of considering the lymph nodes labeled by the ICG as predictive of the state of tumor diffusion ("Targeted Surgery") Type of study: Interventional study.
Specific aims:
- To verify the ability of the procedure to highlight the main tumor lymphatic drainage pathways.
- To validate the concept of Navigation Surgery in gastric surgery by comparing the group of the experimental procedure with a control group undergoing the same type of surgery but not assisted by fluorescence.
- To find a correlation between the nodes marked by the ICG and the remaining nodes removed during the procedure.
- To identify the characteristics of those patients in whom the ICG can effectively discriminate the type of lymphadenectomy to be performed.
Data collection: the following information will be collected for each patient.
- General variables: demographic, histopathological, intra and post-operative features, complications. - Specific variables: total number of lymph nodes retrieved (LNs), Fluorescent lymph nodes (FLNs), metastatic LNs, LNs by station, FLNs outside the standard dissection plane, FLNs status (positive or negative for tumor), non-fluorescent LNs status
Definitions and subdivision of patients:
- True positive patients: patients in which FLNs positive for tumor are detected when LNs positive for tumor are found in the analysis of the surgical specimen.
- False positive patients: patients in which FLNs positive for tumor are detected when LNs negative for tumor are found in the analysis of the surgical specimen.
- True negative patients: patients in which FLNs negative for tumor are detected when LNs negative for tumor are found in the analysis of the surgical specimen.
- False negative patients: patients in which FLNs negative for tumor are detected when LNs positive for tumor are found in the analysis of the surgical specimen.
Sample size: considering the volume of patients included in published studies available in the literature on the use of fluorescence imaging and adding that the present project is the first to describe the use of robotic technology with fluorescence assistance in gastric cancer, a total of 20 patients will be enrolled for the experimental procedure. An additional sample including 20 patients will be the control group, based on the same eligibility criteria. The total sample of patients planned for the present study is therefore of 40 subjects.
Statistical analysis: SPSS v23 will be used to perform data analysis. The dichotomous variables will be expressed as numbers and percentages, while the continuous variables as mean and standard deviation, or median and IQR (minimum and maximum values). For the comparison with the control group, the continuous variables will be analyzed with the T test for independent samples and a value of P <0.05 will be considered statistically significant.
Impact on clinical practice and healthcare system: this project can pave the way for a new concept of lymphadenectomy in gastric cancer involving minimally invasive surgery. Patients could benefit from a more tailored approach to their disease.
- Conditions
- Gastric Cancer, Sentinel Lymph Node
- Being tested
- Image-Guided Robotic Gastrectomy
- Keywords
- Robotic surgery, fluorescence, indocyanine green, lymphadenectomy
- Medical subject headings
- Stomach Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Image-Guided Robotic GastrectomyProcedure or surgery
The near-infrared technology, integrated in the robotic camera, will be used to detect fluorescent lymphonodes.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Image-Guided Robotic Gastrectomy | Experimental | The day before surgery, the ICG will be injected endoscopically into the submucosa of the four quadrants around the tumor (1.25mg/mL, 0.6mL x 4).
A modified total D2 gastrectomy - including the following lymph node stations: 1 - 7 + 8a, 9, 11p, 12a - will be performed in each patient.
The lymph node dissection will be performed using the Da Vinci Xi robotic system and the assistance of the near infrared technology to detect ICG fluorescence.
Even the resulting fluorescent lymph nodes outside the standard dissection plane will be retrieved. The lymph node stations will be sent to the pathologist in different containers and further subdivided according to fluorescence. Receives: Procedure: Image-Guided Robotic Gastrectomy |
| Robotic Gastrectomy | No intervention | Data from patients undergoing the same surgery without the ICG imaging procedure will be collected during the same study period. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Mean difference of total number of LNs retrieved during surgery (mean±DS)
Usefulness of the Navigation Surgery through a comparison between the two groups on the number of LNs retrieved
Measured: 1 year
FLNs identification rate (No, %)
Patients in which the procedure detects FLNs.
Measured: 1 year
Accuracy (%; 95% CI)
Degree of deviation between the FLNs tumor status and the status found in the other LNs analyzed. [true positive patients + true negative patients / TOT patients]
Measured: 1 year
Secondary outcomes (1)
Mean difference of total number of LNs retrieved during the lymphadenectomy of the D2 anatomical plane (mean±DS).
Impact on the D2 lymph node dissection through a comparison between the two groups on the number of LNs removed in the D2 anatomical plane.
Measured: 1 year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted29 Apr 2019
- Study startApr 2019 (estimated)
- Primary completionJan 2020 (estimated)
- Study completionJun 2020 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (12)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Gastric CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- International Study Group on Minimally Invasive Surgery for Gastric Cancer
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Amilcare Parisi, International Study Group on Minimally Invasive Surgery for Gastric Cancer
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03931044
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IG-MIG Vers. 1.0-05.03.2019
- Acronym
- IG-MIG
- Status last verified
- Apr 2019
- First submitted
- 21 Apr 2019
- Last updated
- 29 Apr 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Bray F, Jemal A, Grey N, Ferlay J, Forman D. Global cancer transitions according to the Human Development Index (2008-2030): a population-based study. Lancet Oncol. 2012 Aug;13(8):790-801. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70211-5. Epub 2012 Jun 1.
PubMed 22658655Hartgrink HH, Jansen EP, van Grieken NC, van de Velde CJ. Gastric cancer. Lancet. 2009 Aug 8;374(9688):477-90. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60617-6. Epub 2009 Jul 20.
PubMed 19625077Sasako M, McCulloch P, Kinoshita T, Maruyama K. New method to evaluate the therapeutic value of lymph node dissection for gastric cancer. Br J Surg. 1995 Mar;82(3):346-51. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800820321.
PubMed 7796005Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2014 (ver. 4). Gastric Cancer. 2017 Jan;20(1):1-19. doi: 10.1007/s10120-016-0622-4. Epub 2016 Jun 24. No abstract available.
PubMed 27342689Kitagawa Y, Fujii H, Mukai M, Kubota T, Otani Y, Kitajima M. Radio-guided sentinel node detection for gastric cancer. Br J Surg. 2002 May;89(5):604-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2002.02065.x.
PubMed 11972551Kitagawa Y, Takeuchi H, Takagi Y, Natsugoe S, Terashima M, Murakami N, Fujimura T, Tsujimoto H, Hayashi H, Yoshimizu N, Takagane A, Mohri Y, Nabeshima K, Uenosono Y, Kinami S, Sakamoto J, Morita S, Aikou T, Miwa K, Kitajima M. Sentinel node mapping for gastric cancer: a prospective multicenter trial in Japan. J Clin Oncol. 2013 Oct 10;31(29):3704-10. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.50.3789. Epub 2013 Sep 9.
PubMed 24019550Kitagawa Y, Fujii H, Kumai K, Kubota T, Otani Y, Saikawa Y, Yoshida M, Kubo A, Kitajima M. Recent advances in sentinel node navigation for gastric cancer: a paradigm shift of surgical management. J Surg Oncol. 2005 Jun 1;90(3):147-51; discussion 151-2. doi: 10.1002/jso.20220.
PubMed 15895450Tani T, Sonoda H, Tani M. Sentinel lymph node navigation surgery for gastric cancer: Does it really benefit the patient? World J Gastroenterol. 2016 Mar 14;22(10):2894-9. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i10.2894.
PubMed 26973385Vahrmeijer AL, Hutteman M, van der Vorst JR, van de Velde CJ, Frangioni JV. Image-guided cancer surgery using near-infrared fluorescence. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2013 Sep;10(9):507-18. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2013.123. Epub 2013 Jul 23.
PubMed 23881033Yoshida M, Kubota K, Kuroda J, Ohta K, Nakamura T, Saito J, Kobayashi M, Sato T, Beck Y, Kitagawa Y, Kitajima M. Indocyanine green injection for detecting sentinel nodes using color fluorescence camera in the laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012 Apr;27 Suppl 3:29-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2012.07067.x.
PubMed 22486868Bu L, Shen B, Cheng Z. Fluorescent imaging of cancerous tissues for targeted surgery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2014 Sep 30;76:21-38. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2014.07.008. Epub 2014 Jul 24.
PubMed 25064553Marano A, Priora F, Lenti LM, Ravazzoni F, Quarati R, Spinoglio G. Application of fluorescence in robotic general surgery: review of the literature and state of the art. World J Surg. 2013 Dec;37(12):2800-11. doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-2066-x.
PubMed 23645129
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Apr 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Fluorescence Image-Guided Lymphadenectomy Using Indocyanine Green and Near Infrared Technology in Robotic Gastrectomy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03931044
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IG-MIG / IG-MIG Vers. 1.0-05.03.2019
- Conditions
- Gastric Cancer, Sentinel Lymph Node
- Keywords
- Robotic surgery, fluorescence, indocyanine green, lymphadenectomy
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- International Study Group on Minimally Invasive Surgery for Gastric CancerUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Apr 2019 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- Jan 2020 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Jun 2020 (estimated)
- First posted
- 29 Apr 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Gastric cancer is a worldwide challenge due to its spread, even epidemic in some areas, and the high mortality rates. Lymphadenectomy is considered the fundamental step during radical gastrectomy. In recent years, some researchers have tried to find a way to improve the surgical identification of the lymphatic drainage routes and lymph node stations. This new surgical frontier is the so called "navigation surgery". Among the different reported solutions, lately, the indocyanine green (ICG) has drawn attention. It is a fluorescence dye, that can be detected in the near infrared spectral band (NIR). The development of specific fluorescence imaging devices has allowed surgeons to visualize tumors, vascular and lymphatic structures. The Da Vinci Xi robotic system has an integrated imaging technology that has been used in colo-rectal and hepato-biliary surgery. However, up to date, the combined use of fluorescence imaging and robotic technology has not been evaluated during lymphadenectomy in gastric cancer.
The general design of the present study is to evaluate the role of fluorescence imaging during robotic lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer.
Detailed description
Background Gastric cancer is the fourth most widespread cancer in the world and is characterized by high mortality rates [1, 2]. A multidisciplinary context, in which surgery plays the main role, is essential to offer the best therapeutic strategy. Lymph node involvement in gastric cancer is present in 2-18% when the depth of the tumor invasion is limited to the mucosal or submucosal layer, but rises to 50% when the tumor involves the subserosa [3]. Lymphadenectomy is a fundamental surgical phase that must guarantee the oncological radicality and allow an appropriate tumor staging. Although it is among the most relevant factors influencing long-term survival, its extension and standardization is still the subject of much debate. The two latest editions of the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association (JGCA) guidelines [4] recommend a dissection on different levels (D1, D1 +, D2) depending on the type of gastrectomy and the clinical stage of the tumor. In recent years, some researchers have tried to apply the concept of "sentinel lymph node" to gastric cancer [5-7]. Although some do not consider that terminology the appropriate one in the context of gastric cancer, because of the multidirectional gastric lymphatic flows, several studies have highlighted interesting aspects, such as: limiting an extensive lymphatic dissection when not necessary, identifying the drainage routes outside the standard anatomical planes, possible assistance in minimally invasive procedures [8]. Most of the experiences in lymph nodes mapping were performed with a radio-isotope (Tc99m) associated or not with the intraoperative use of vital dyes (Blue dye). More recently, the properties of the ICG have been studied. This is a fluorescence dye, that can be detected in the NIR [9, 10]. The development of imaging tools using "NIR / ICG" technology is therefore an innovative approach for visualizing tumors, vascular structures, lymphatic channels, and lymph nodes [11]. Some advantages of the ICG are: reduced toxicity, absence of radioactivity, low cost, safe administration both intravenously and endoscopically through the submucosa or subserosa, protein binding without changing molecular structures, macrophages interaction at the lymph node level. Devices for fluorescence imaging are currently available in both open and minimally invasive surgery.
In this field, robotic surgery has been becoming of great interest thanks to the manufacturing of new instruments which, compared to laparoscopy, allow to improve manual skills and gentleness in challenging movements [12]. The Da Vinci Xi robotic system has also produced an innovative imaging technology for ICG visualization made up with a laser source integrated in the robotic camera (Firefly). The surgeon at the console has therefore a 3-D vision that can switch to the fluorescence mode without the need to change the camera. Few clinical experiences have been reported to date [12]. Published articles refer to assistance in colo-rectal and hepato-biliary surgery for vessels or biliary structures visualization, while its use during lymph node dissection for gastric cancer has not yet been the subject of study protocols.
Hypothesis: fluorescence imaging during lymphadenectomy in gastric cancer can significantly improve the quality of the dissection through a better visualization of anatomical planes and allow tailored dissections. Moreover, the tumor status in the fluorescent nodes could predict the nodes status in the overall specimen with high accuracy rate.
Methods General study design: the overall objective is verifying the feasibility and the role of a lymphadenectomy assisted by fluorescence imaging during robotic gastrectomy.
Two levels of investigation are planned:
- to detect the possible advantages of a fluorescence-guided surgery ("Navigation Surgery");
- to evaluate the possibility of considering the lymph nodes labeled by the ICG as predictive of the state of tumor diffusion ("Targeted Surgery") Type of study: Interventional study.
Specific aims:
- To verify the ability of the procedure to highlight the main tumor lymphatic drainage pathways.
- To validate the concept of Navigation Surgery in gastric surgery by comparing the group of the experimental procedure with a control group undergoing the same type of surgery but not assisted by fluorescence.
- To find a correlation between the nodes marked by the ICG and the remaining nodes removed during the procedure.
- To identify the characteristics of those patients in whom the ICG can effectively discriminate the type of lymphadenectomy to be performed.
Data collection: the following information will be collected for each patient.
- General variables: demographic, histopathological, intra and post-operative features, complications. - Specific variables: total number of lymph nodes retrieved (LNs), Fluorescent lymph nodes (FLNs), metastatic LNs, LNs by station, FLNs outside the standard dissection plane, FLNs status (positive or negative for tumor), non-fluorescent LNs status
Definitions and subdivision of patients:
- True positive patients: patients in which FLNs positive for tumor are detected when LNs positive for tumor are found in the analysis of the surgical specimen.
- False positive patients: patients in which FLNs positive for tumor are detected when LNs negative for tumor are found in the analysis of the surgical specimen.
- True negative patients: patients in which FLNs negative for tumor are detected when LNs negative for tumor are found in the analysis of the surgical specimen.
- False negative patients: patients in which FLNs negative for tumor are detected when LNs positive for tumor are found in the analysis of the surgical specimen.
Sample size: considering the volume of patients included in published studies available in the literature on the use of fluorescence imaging and adding that the present project is the first to describe the use of robotic technology with fluorescence assistance in gastric cancer, a total of 20 patients will be enrolled for the experimental procedure. An additional sample including 20 patients will be the control group, based on the same eligibility criteria. The total sample of patients planned for the present study is therefore of 40 subjects.
Statistical analysis: SPSS v23 will be used to perform data analysis. The dichotomous variables will be expressed as numbers and percentages, while the continuous variables as mean and standard deviation, or median and IQR (minimum and maximum values). For the comparison with the control group, the continuous variables will be analyzed with the T test for independent samples and a value of P <0.05 will be considered statistically significant.
Impact on clinical practice and healthcare system: this project can pave the way for a new concept of lymphadenectomy in gastric cancer involving minimally invasive surgery. Patients could benefit from a more tailored approach to their disease.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Image-Guided Robotic Gastrectomy | Experimental | Procedure: Image-Guided Robotic GastrectomyThe day before surgery, the ICG will be injected endoscopically into the submucosa of the four quadrants around the tumor (1.25mg/mL, 0.6mL x 4). A modified total D2 gastrectomy - including the following lymph node stations: 1 - 7 + 8a, 9, 11p, 12a - will be performed in each patient. The lymph node dissection will be performed using the Da Vinci Xi robotic system and the assistance of the near infrared technology to detect ICG fluorescence. Even the resulting fluorescent lymph nodes outside the standard dissection plane will be retrieved. The lymph node stations will be sent to the pathologist in different containers and further subdivided according to fluorescence. |
| Robotic Gastrectomy | No intervention | –Data from patients undergoing the same surgery without the ICG imaging procedure will be collected during the same study period. |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- diagnosis of gastric cancer proved through the endoscopic biopsy
- cT1 - cT3
- cN0
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- history of allergies related to iodine
- pregnancy
- cT4,
- cN +
- distant metastases
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Image-Guided Robotic GastrectomyThe near-infrared technology, integrated in the robotic camera, will be used to detect fluorescent lymphonodes. | Procedure or surgery | Image-Guided Robotic Gastrectomy |
Primary outcome
Mean difference of total number of LNs retrieved during surgery (mean±DS)
Time frame: 1 year
Usefulness of the Navigation Surgery through a comparison between the two groups on the number of LNs retrieved
FLNs identification rate (No, %)
Time frame: 1 year
Patients in which the procedure detects FLNs.
Accuracy (%; 95% CI)
Time frame: 1 year
Degree of deviation between the FLNs tumor status and the status found in the other LNs analyzed. [true positive patients + true negative patients / TOT patients]
1 secondary outcome
Mean difference of total number of LNs retrieved during the lymphadenectomy of the D2 anatomical plane (mean±DS).
Time frame: 1 year
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Apr 2019.
- Background: PubMed 22658655Bray F, Jemal A, Grey N, Ferlay J, Forman D. Global cancer transitions according to the Human Development Index (2008-2030): a population-based study. Lancet Oncol. 2012 Aug;13(8):790-801. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70211-5. Epub 2012 Jun 1.
- Background: PubMed 19625077Hartgrink HH, Jansen EP, van Grieken NC, van de Velde CJ. Gastric cancer. Lancet. 2009 Aug 8;374(9688):477-90. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60617-6. Epub 2009 Jul 20.
- Background: PubMed 7796005Sasako M, McCulloch P, Kinoshita T, Maruyama K. New method to evaluate the therapeutic value of lymph node dissection for gastric cancer. Br J Surg. 1995 Mar;82(3):346-51. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800820321.
- Background: PubMed 27342689Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2014 (ver. 4). Gastric Cancer. 2017 Jan;20(1):1-19. doi: 10.1007/s10120-016-0622-4. Epub 2016 Jun 24. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 11972551Kitagawa Y, Fujii H, Mukai M, Kubota T, Otani Y, Kitajima M. Radio-guided sentinel node detection for gastric cancer. Br J Surg. 2002 May;89(5):604-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2002.02065.x.
- Background: PubMed 24019550Kitagawa Y, Takeuchi H, Takagi Y, Natsugoe S, Terashima M, Murakami N, Fujimura T, Tsujimoto H, Hayashi H, Yoshimizu N, Takagane A, Mohri Y, Nabeshima K, Uenosono Y, Kinami S, Sakamoto J, Morita S, Aikou T, Miwa K, Kitajima M. Sentinel node mapping for gastric cancer: a prospective multicenter trial in Japan. J Clin Oncol. 2013 Oct 10;31(29):3704-10. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.50.3789. Epub 2013 Sep 9.
- Background: PubMed 15895450Kitagawa Y, Fujii H, Kumai K, Kubota T, Otani Y, Saikawa Y, Yoshida M, Kubo A, Kitajima M. Recent advances in sentinel node navigation for gastric cancer: a paradigm shift of surgical management. J Surg Oncol. 2005 Jun 1;90(3):147-51; discussion 151-2. doi: 10.1002/jso.20220.
- Background: PubMed 26973385Tani T, Sonoda H, Tani M. Sentinel lymph node navigation surgery for gastric cancer: Does it really benefit the patient? World J Gastroenterol. 2016 Mar 14;22(10):2894-9. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i10.2894.
- Background: PubMed 23881033Vahrmeijer AL, Hutteman M, van der Vorst JR, van de Velde CJ, Frangioni JV. Image-guided cancer surgery using near-infrared fluorescence. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2013 Sep;10(9):507-18. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2013.123. Epub 2013 Jul 23.
- Background: PubMed 22486868Yoshida M, Kubota K, Kuroda J, Ohta K, Nakamura T, Saito J, Kobayashi M, Sato T, Beck Y, Kitagawa Y, Kitajima M. Indocyanine green injection for detecting sentinel nodes using color fluorescence camera in the laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012 Apr;27 Suppl 3:29-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2012.07067.x.
- Background: PubMed 25064553Bu L, Shen B, Cheng Z. Fluorescent imaging of cancerous tissues for targeted surgery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2014 Sep 30;76:21-38. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2014.07.008. Epub 2014 Jul 24.
- Background: PubMed 23645129Marano A, Priora F, Lenti LM, Ravazzoni F, Quarati R, Spinoglio G. Application of fluorescence in robotic general surgery: review of the literature and state of the art. World J Surg. 2013 Dec;37(12):2800-11. doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-2066-x.
Related trials for Gastric Cancer
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
A Beta-only IL-2 ImmunoTherapY Study
Advanced Solid Tumor, Unresectable Solid Tumor
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Adding Nivolumab to Usual Treatment for People With Advanced Stomach or Esophageal Cancer, PARAMUNE Trial
Advanced Esophageal Adenocarcinoma, Advanced Gastric Adenocarcinoma
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study With NKT3964 for Adults With Advanced/Metastatic Solid Tumors
Solid Tumor, Advanced Solid Tumor
RecruitingPhase 1/2
EIK1005-002: A Clinical Research Study Evaluating EIK1005, a Werner Helicase Inhibitor, as Monotherapy and in Combination With Pembrolizumab in Participants With Advanced Solid Tumors Including Microsatellite Instability High (MSI-H) Tumors
Advanced Solid Tumors, MSI-H or dMMR Advanced Solid Tumors
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study to Evaluate the Safety,Pharmacokinetics,Pharmacodynamics,and Efficacy of TJ037130 in Adult Participants With Advanced Solid Tumors
Solid Tumor, Metastatic Ovary Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Image-Guided Robotic Gastrectomy in people with Gastric Cancer and Sentinel Lymph Node, run by International Study Group on Minimally Invasive Surgery for Gastric Cancer at 2 sites in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Apr 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Jacopo Desiderio, MD (+393497531121, j.desiderio@aospterni.it), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Mean difference of total number of LNs retrieved during surgery (mean±DS) (time frame: 1 year). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03931044, which also lists 12 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Apr 2019; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 31 Oct 2026.