AzTrials
AzTrials

Seasonal Allergic RhinitisPhase 1G104NCT03931993

A Study of Tolerability and Safety of a New Cumulative Dose of Grass MATA MPL

A Phase 1 study testing Grass MATA MPL in people with Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis, run by Allergy Therapeutics at 4 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

There is increasing evidence that the effectiveness of allergy immunotherapy to control symptoms of rhinoconjunctivitis is related to the cumulative dose of allergen or allergoid administered during a single regimen of subcutaneous (SC) injections or of sublingual administration. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 50 years
Conditions the study is for
Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis
What is being tested?
Grass MATA MPL
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
30 participants
Where
4 sitesUnited States
Study dates
16 Jan 2017to 27 Apr 2017
Phase
Phase 1
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 50 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients must have a positive skin prick test for grass pollen allergen.
  • Positive skin prick test to positive histamine control
  • Negative skin prick test to negative control
  • Specific IgE for grass pollen as documented by ImmunoCAP test with class ≥ 2
  • A history of moderate to severe symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis and/or conjunctivitis due to grass (Pooideae) pollen exposure that required repeated use of antihistamines, nasal steroids, and/or leukotriene modifiers for relief of symptoms during the last two consecutive seasons prior to the study
  • Males or non-pregnant, non-lactating females who are not of child-bearing potential or using effective contraception
Show all 11Show fewer
  • Patients who are normally active and otherwise judged to be in good health
  • For patients with a history of asthma, forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) ≥ 80% of National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES) predicted, with a FEV1/forced vital capacity (FVC) ratio ≥ 70%.
  • Able to observe the drug washout times listed in the Prohibited Medications Table below prior to screening
  • Patients willing and able to attend required study visits and able to follow the protocol requirements.
  • Patients willing and able to give written informed consent.

Who cannot join

  • Symptoms outside the grass pollen season due to a perennial and/or non-grass seasonal allergen, if the patient is unable to avoid the offending allergen.
  • Immunological disorders or other diseases that in the opinion of the investigator may pose a safety risk.
  • Presence of moderate to severe asthma, characterized by the current use of inhaled steroids at a daily dose above 400 micrograms of budesonide (or equivalent)
  • Emergency room visit or admission for asthma in the 12 months prior to Visit 1 or history of a life-threatening asthma attack ever.
  • Presence of non-atopic rhinitis and/or rhino-sinusitis (with or without polyps).
  • Presence of any skin conditions (skin abnormalities, tattoos etc.) which might interfere with the interpretation of the SPT results.
Show all 19Show fewer
  • Current diagnosis of type I diabetes. Patients with type II diabetes will only be allowed to participate at the discretion of the investigator.
  • Treatment with a preparation containing MPL (e.g. Cervarix) within 6 months prior to screening
  • Moderate to severe upper or lower respiratory tract infections requiring medication within 14 days of or a diagnosis of sinusitis within 30 days of randomisation
  • Clinical history of severe or life-threatening anaphylactic reactions to foods, insect venom, exercise, drugs or idiopathic anaphylaxis.
  • Clinical history of allergy, hypersensitivity or intolerance to the excipients of the study medication.
  • Tyrosine metabolism disorders, especially tyrosinemia and alkaptonuria.
  • Unable to receive epinephrine therapy (i.e., use of epinephrine is contraindicated).
  • Clinical history of immunodeficiency, including those who are on immunosuppressant therapy.
  • Clinical history of recurrent idiopathic angioedema.
  • Beta-blocker medication, including eye drops, for any indication.
  • Treatment with monoamine oxidase inhibitors, tricyclic antidepressants or ACE inhibitors.
  • Clinical history of drug or alcohol abuse which, in the investigator's opinion, could interfere with the patient's ability to participate in the study.
  • Participation in a clinical research trial with any investigational medicinal product within 4 weeks of screening or concomitantly with this study.

Trial locations and contacts

4 sites in 1 country.

United States4 sites
  • Vedas Research

    Edison, New Jersey

  • Atlantic Reseach Center

    Ocean City, New Jersey, 07712

  • STARx Asthma and Allergy Center

    Springfield, New Jersey, 07081-2515

  • Allergy Partners of New Jersey

    Teaneck, New Jersey

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A Pre-Season,Randomized,Single-blind,Placebo-controlled,Parallel-group Study to Determine Tolerability+Safety of a New Cumulative Dose of GrassMATAMPL Compared With Placebo in Patients With Seasonal Allergic Rhinoconjunctivitis Due to Grass Pollen Allergy

There is increasing evidence that the effectiveness of allergy immunotherapy to control symptoms of rhinoconjunctivitis is related to the cumulative dose of allergen or allergoid administered during a single regimen of subcutaneous (SC) injections or of sublingual administration. Previously, high cumulative doses of the Grass MATA MPL 10200 and 18200 SU (Standardized Units) were compared with the marketed dose of 5100 SU and were found to have acceptable tolerability and safety. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the tolerability and safety of an even higher cumulative dose regimen of 35600 SU. of Grass MATA MPL compared with placebo in patients with seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis (SAR) due to grass pollen, to enable selection of the best dose to take forward for further development.

Read the detailed description

This will be a placebo-controlled study, using a 1:1 randomization and parallel-group, single-blind design, in patients with seasonal allergic rhino-conjunctivitis to grass pollen conducted at multiple centres in the US. The study will be conducted outside the grass pollen season and is comprised of 3 periods.

  • Period 1: Screening
  • Period 2: Randomization and treatment
  • Period 3: Post-treatment safety follow-up

Period 1 consists of the screening visit (Visit 1) at which patient eligibility will be assessed. Blood samples will be taken for clinical safety laboratory assessments and for baseline transcriptomics analysis. Eligible patients will proceed to Period 2 for enrolment into study.

Period 2 starts with the randomization visit (Visit 2: 3-33 days after Visit 1), at which eligible patients will be randomly allocated to the Grass MATA MPL 35600 SU or placebo treatment groups and receive the first of 6 weekly injections of subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT). Injections 2 to 6 will be administered at Visits 3 to 7. After each injection, patients will be kept under observation at the site for at least 30 minutes by personnel qualified to observe for and manage local and systemic adverse events. This period may be extended by the investigator according to his/her judgment. The observation will be followed up by a telephone call approximately 24 hours after the time of injection. In the event of mild or moderate systemic adverse events judged by the investigator to be well-tolerated by the patient and to show good recovery, the patient may continue treatment as scheduled.

Period 3 (Visit 8 - End of Study) will occur 6-8 days after Visit 7 to review any AEs and to perform end-of-treatment assessments, which will include blood draws for safety laboratory tests and transcriptomics analysis.

Being tested
Placebo comparator, Grass MATA MPL
Keywords
Grass MATA MPL, Safety
Medical subject headings
Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Placebo comparatorBiological

  • Grass MATA MPLBiological

Study groups in NCT03931993
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Treatment Group 1Placebo comparatorSix 1.0mL placebo injections (2% w/v L-tyrosine)
Receives: Biological: Placebo comparator
Treatment Group 2ExperimentalSix 1.0mL injections of Grass MATA MPL 900, 2700, 8000, 8000, 8000, and 8000 SU
Receives: Biological: Grass MATA MPL

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number and frequency of adverse events (AEs)

    Measured: 36 - 48 days

  2. Number and frequency of adverse reaction complexes (ARCs)

    The maximum intensity of all injection site [local] and systemic AEs experienced by a patient within a 24-hour period after an injection.

    Measured: 36 - 48 days

  3. Frequency of premature discontinuation from treatment or study due to AEs.

    Measured: 36 - 48 days

  4. Changes in vital sign parameters at all visits in the treatment period from pre-injection to post-injection - Systolic blood pressure

    Mean values compared to normal range

    Measured: 30 - 40 days

  5. Changes in vital sign parameters at all visits in the treatment period from pre-injection to post-injection - Diastolic blood pressure

    Mean values compared to normal range

    Measured: 30 - 40 days

  6. Changes in vital sign parameters at all visits in the treatment period from pre-injection to post-injection - Pulse

    Mean values compared to normal range

    Measured: 30 - 40 days

  7. Changes in vital sign parameters at all visits in the treatment period from pre-injection to post-injection - Body temperature

    Mean values compared to normal range

    Measured: 30 - 40 days

  8. Changes in routine clinical laboratory values - Serum Chemistry

    Absolute and relative number of patients with values below, within or above the normal range

    Measured: 36 - 48 days

  9. Changes in routine clinical laboratory values - Hematology

    Absolute and relative number of patients with values below, within or above the normal range

    Measured: 36 - 48 days

  10. Changes in routine clinical laboratory values - Urinalysis

    Absolute and relative number of patients with values below, within or above the normal range

    Measured: 36 - 48 days

  11. Changes in peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) before and after injections in asthmatic patients

    Measured: 30 - 40 days

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Number and frequency of neuro-inflammatory (NI) events.

    Assessed by clinical judgement

    Measured: 36 - 48 days

  2. Number and frequency of new onset autoimmune disease (NOAD) events.

    Assessed by clinical judgement

    Measured: 36 - 48 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted30 Apr 2019
  2. Study start16 Jan 2017
  3. Primary completion27 Apr 2017
  4. Study completion27 Apr 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 1
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Single-blind
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
30 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03931993
Sponsor's protocol ID
GrassMATAMPL104
Acronym
G104
Status last verified
Apr 2019
First submitted
29 Mar 2017
Last updated
30 Apr 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 1 study testing Grass MATA MPL in people with Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis, run by Allergy Therapeutics at 4 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 11 inclusion and 19 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Apr 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 4 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number and frequency of adverse events (AEs) (time frame: 36 - 48 days). The study lists 11 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Apr 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in