AzTrials
AzTrials

Stable AnginaNCT03935542

Assessment of Diagonal Branch Territory

An observational study of Stable Angina and Unstable Angina, run by Bon-Kwon Koo at 1 site in South Korea.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study was performed to investigate the anatomical attributes that determine myocardial territory of diagonal branches and to develop a prediction model for clinically relevant branches using myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) and coronary CT angiography (CCTA). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 20 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Stable Angina, Unstable Angina
How many people
355 participants
Where
1 siteSouth Korea
Study dates
3 Aug 2015to 8 Oct 2018
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 20 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients with angina pectoris

Who may be able to join

  • Patients with severe jailed diagonal branch disease with available MPI in 3 months (MPI arm)
  • Patients who had available FMM value of diagonal branches from a previous multicenter prospective CCTA registry (CCTA arm)

Who cannot join

  • Patients with >50% stenosis at left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) or left circumflex artery (LCx), regional wall motion abnormality at LAD territory (MPI arm)
  • Patients with diffuse diagonal branch disease (CCTA arm)

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

South Korea1 site
  • Seoul National University Hospital

    Seoul

Other trials in South Korea

About this study

Official title: Anatomical Attributes of Clinically Relevant Diagonal Branches in Patients With Left Anterior Descending Coronary Artery Bifurcation Lesions

This study was performed to investigate the anatomical attributes that determine myocardial territory of diagonal branches and to develop a prediction model for clinically relevant branches using myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) and coronary CT angiography (CCTA).

Read the detailed description

Bifurcation lesion is one of the most challenging lesion subsets in the field of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Despite the recent advances in PCI techniques and stent technology, most randomized studies failed to prove the superiority of systematic 2 stenting strategy compared with provisional side branch intervention strategy.

A certain amount of ischemic burden is required to achieve the benefit of revascularization over medical treatment. Compared with major epicardial vessels, side branches are smaller, more variable in anatomy, supplying less myocardium and less clinically relevant. Therefore, it is important to assess the myocardial mass at risk of side branches to determine the appropriate treatment strategy for bifurcation lesions. However, how to define the clinically relevant side branches which can be associated with the benefit of revascularization in a cardiac catheterization laboratory is not well-known.

The investigators performed this study to investigate the anatomical attributes that determine ischemic burden and myocardial territory of diagonal branches and to develop a prediction model for a clinically relevant diagonal branch using myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) and coronary CT angiography (CCTA).

Keywords
Bifurcation, Side branch, Ischemia, Myocardium, Revascularization
Medical subject headings
Angina, Stable, Angina, Unstable, Ischemia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT03935542
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
MPI armFor the MPI arm, patients with severe jailed diagonal branch disease with available MPI in 3 months were selected from the Seoul National University Hospital Cardiac Catheterization and MPI database.
CCTA armFor the CCTA arm, patients from a previous multicenter prospective CCTA registry were retrospectively reviewed for a post-hoc analysis.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Angiographic attributes for diagonal branches

    Angiographic attributes for diagonal branches were visually defined as follows :

    1. Size was a binary attribute of vessel diameter ≥ 2.5mm or < 2.5mm.
    2. Number was counted as one, two, and 3 or more diagonal branches.
    3. Dominancy in patients with 2 diagonal branches (D1/2 dominancy) was a binary attribute for one of two diagonal branches whose diameter was more than two times larger than its smaller counterpart.
    4. LCx dominancy was defined as a left-dominant system or a presence of obtuse marginal branch originating within proximal 1/3 of LCx and crossing LAD at right anterior oblique caudal view.

    Measured: through study completion, an average of 1year

  2. Sensitivity of prediction model

    Prediction model using anatomical attributes to define clinical relevance of diagonal branches will be developed.

    Measured: through study completion, an average of 1year

  3. Specificity of prediction model

    Prediction model using anatomical attributes to define clinical relevance of diagonal branches will be developed.

    Measured: through study completion, an average of 1year

  4. Negative predictive value of prediction model

    Prediction model using anatomical attributes to define clinical relevance of diagonal branches will be developed.

    Measured: through study completion, an average of 1year

  5. Positive predictive value of prediction model

    Prediction model using anatomical attributes to define clinical relevance of diagonal branches will be developed.

    Measured: through study completion, an average of 1year

  6. Area under the curve of prediction model

    Prediction model using anatomical attributes to define clinical relevance of diagonal branches will be developed.

    Measured: through study completion, an average of 1year

  7. Accuracy of prediction model

    Prediction model using anatomical attributes to define clinical relevance of diagonal branches will be developed.

    Measured: through study completion, an average of 1year

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. %Ischemia

    Myocardium of perfusion image was divided into 20 segments, and summed rest score (SRS), summed stress score (SSS), and summed difference score (SDS) were scored in each segment according to a 5-grade system (0-4) for the assessment of perfusion status. (1) SSS and SDS of diagonal segments were converted to percent of myocardial ischemia (%ischemia) of diagonal territory by dividing summed scores by 80 and multiplying by 100.

    Measured: through study completion, an average of 1year

  2. %FMM

    FMM was calculated using stem-and-crown model as described in the parent study. (2) FMM of each diagonal brach was converted to percent FMM (%FMM) of diagonal branch by dividing each FMM by left ventricular myocardial mass.

    Measured: through study completion, an average of 1year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted2 May 2019
  2. Study start3 Aug 2015
  3. Primary completion6 Feb 2017
  4. Study completion8 Oct 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
355 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03935542
Sponsor's protocol ID
SB-FMM-prediction
Status last verified
Apr 2019
First submitted
26 Apr 2019
Last updated
2 May 2019
Results posted
No

Publications

  • Paeng JC, Lee DS, Cheon GJ, Lee MM, Chung JK, Lee MC. Reproducibility of an automatic quantitation of regional myocardial wall motion and systolic thickening on gated 99mTc-sestamibi myocardial SPECT. J Nucl Med. 2001 May;42(5):695-700.

    PubMed 11337562
  • Kim HY, Lim HS, Doh JH, Nam CW, Shin ES, Koo BK, Yoon MH, Tahk SJ, Kang DK, Song YB, Hahn JY, Choi SH, Gwon HC, Lee SH, Kim EK, Kim SM, Choe Y, Choi JH. Physiological Severity of Coronary Artery Stenosis Depends on the Amount of Myocardial Mass Subtended by the Coronary Artery. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Aug 8;9(15):1548-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.04.008. Epub 2016 Jul 13.

    PubMed 27423225
  • Jeon WK, Park J, Koo BK, Suh M, Yang S, Kim HY, Lee JM, Kim KJ, Choi JH, Lim HS, Paeng JC, Hwang D, Kim HS; Collaborators. Anatomical attributes of clinically relevant diagonal branches in patients with left anterior descending coronary artery bifurcation lesions. EuroIntervention. 2020 Oct 9;16(9):e715-e723. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-19-00534.

    PubMed 31719001

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Stable Angina and Unstable Angina, run by Bon-Kwon Koo at 1 site in South Korea.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 May 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Angiographic attributes for diagonal branches (time frame: through study completion, an average of 1year). The study lists 7 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03935542, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 May 2019; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 6 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in