Traumatic Brain InjuryTARDISNCT03937947
Traumatic Brain Injury Associated Radiological DVT Incidence and Significance Study
An observational study of Traumatic Brain Injury and Deep Vein Thrombosis, run by NHS Lothian at 1 site in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
Whilst deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is common following traumatic brain injury (TBI), optimal timing and safety of pharmacological prophylaxis is uncertain. Paradoxically the harm associated with the occurrence of is also unclear. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 16 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Traumatic Brain Injury, Deep Vein Thrombosis, Acute Lung Injury
- How many people
- 90 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- 28 Sep 2019to 24 Sep 2023
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 16 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Study population: Adults with moderate to severe TBI requiring critical care support.
Who may be able to join
- Age ≥ 16 years
- Admission to critical care
- moderate/severe, non-penetrating traumatic brain injury
- Abnormal brain CT Scan
- Post resuscitation Glasgow coma score (GCS) ≤12, or GCS motor component ≤5
- Able to complete consent and first USS within 72 hours of injury
Who cannot join
- Normal brain CT scan
- Unlikely to survive for the next 24 hours in the opinion of the ICU Consultant or Consultant Neurosurgeon treating the patient
- Contra indication to normal prophylactic measures, including heparin, were indicated
- Known blood clotting disorder or thrombophilia
- Significant pelvic or lower limb trauma
- Malignancy
- Pregnancy or recently post-partum
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United Kingdom1 site
Intensive Care Unit, Western General Hospital
Edinburgh, Midlothian, EH42XU
About this study
Official title: Traumatic Brain Injury Associated Radiological Deep Venous Thrombosis Incidence and Significance
Whilst deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is common following traumatic brain injury (TBI), optimal timing and safety of pharmacological prophylaxis is uncertain. Paradoxically the harm associated with the occurrence of is also unclear.
This study is an observational pilot that aims to define the incidence of proximal DVT in patients with moderate to severe TBI. It seeks prospectively to determine if there is an association between DVT and outcome. It also seeks to explore possible associations between the occurrence of DVT and the incidence of lung injury and/or ventilator associated pneumonia.
Read the detailed description
Deep Venous Thrombosis (DVT) is common following trauma and patients with TBI are at increased risk. In studies of TBI that screened for DVT in the proximal lower limb veins, the incidence is between 14 and 18%. Pharmacological thromboprophylaxis (PT) may be effective in reducing the incidence of DVT following TBI. However, there is a reluctance to commence it due to concerns about the risk of intracranial haematoma expansion and contusion enlargement. PT is therefore often delayed, exposing patients to potential risks and complications of DVT. Recent systematic reviews could not answer the question of when to commence PT as no high quality randomised controlled trials addressing this question have been conducted. The latest edition of the Brain Trauma Foundation Guidelines could not make a recommendation on this issue . A Delphi exercise involving the investigator's network of United Kingdom(UK) Eurotherm3235 study centres found that the leading concern of specialists in UK neurocritical care, that they felt required further study, was when to commence PT following moderate to severe TBI.
Paradoxically however, despite these concerns over the use of PT in this population of patients, evidence of harm associated with the confirmed presence of proximal DVT is not yet convincing. This has additional significance as without clear evidence of harm associated with DVT complicating TBI, trials to address the questions of safety and efficacy of earlier use of PT are difficult to design and unlikely to attract the necessary funding.
From a search of a trauma registry of patients at risk of DVT who underwent venous screening, in TBI patients the occurrence of DVT was associated with increased ventilator days (Mean (SD), 18.0 (14.9) vs. 9.3 (7.9) days for DVT vs. no DVT, p=0.014) and ICU length of stay (23.0 (14.5) vs. 13.1 (9.8) days for DVT vs. no DVT, p=0.006). Similar results were seen in a post hoc analysis of the EPO TBI trial. This was a randomised controlled trial (RCT) of the effect of erythropoietin (EPO) verses placebo on outcome following TBI. Repeated lower limb screening for the presence of DVT was conducted as part of the protocol. Both ventilator days (Median (IQR) 11 (6-17) vs. 8 (4-14) days for DVT vs. no DVT, p<0.001) and ICU length of stay (17 (11-22) vs. 12 (6-19) days DVT vs. no DVT, p<0.001). Good neurological outcome at 6 months was significantly less frequent in those that developed DVT (45.4 vs. 57.9% DVT vs. no DVT, p=0.01). Whilst these findings are clinically important they are the result of retrospective and post hoc analysis. They therefore require to be prospectively validated if they are to be accepted.
One possible explanation for an increase in ventilator dependency and ICU length of stay could be the occurrence of undiagnosed pulmonary emboli causing acute lung injury (ALI). The occurrence of ventilation perfusion mismatching, deterioration in arterial partial pressure: fraction inspired oxygen ratio (PaO2:FiO2) and radiological changes on chest x-ray, being interpreted as evidence of pulmonary infection. This is supported by local audit data from June to October 2017 which found that 37% of brain injured patients had a clinical diagnosis of ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP) and were treated with antibiotics but lacked subsequent microbiological confirmation. It is also possible that small pulmonary emboli might predispose to pulmonary infection, explaining why the incidence of ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP) remains high in this population (40%, in the same local audit) despite the adoption of measures which have lowered VAP rates in other critically ill patient groups.
Lung Brain "cross-talk" could link evidence of ALI to a negative impact on neurological outcome in these patients. A disproportionate increase in mortality in patients with TBI and ALI has been reported. This was greatly in excess of deaths attributable to pulmonary dysfunction. Similarly, in animal models, ALI was found to be associated with cognitive impairment, and biomarker/histological evidence of neuronal injury.
This is a prospective, potentially multi centre, observational pilot study that aims to determine the incidence of DVT after TBI. Patients admitted to an ICU within 72 hours of suffering a TBI will be eligible for inclusion. The study will run for 2 years with a 16 month recruitment period. Based on current activity in Edinburgh the investigators estimate that 50 to 60 patients will be eligible for recruitment over the course of the study. In order to ensure satisfactory recruitment, the investigators will also approach centres that have expressed an interest.
Once consent is obtained for the patient to be enrolled in the study, a compression ultrasound scan (USS) of both legs will be carried out as soon as possible so that the first USS is completed within 72 hours of injury. USS will be repeated on alternate days up to Day 10 from injury. Daily data collection will include information on the use of mechanical and pharmacological thromboprophylaxis, ventilator dynamics including FiO2 and PaO2, chest X ray reports, clinical and microbiological diagnosis of ventilator associated pneumonia, ventilator days and ICU and hospital length of stay. The Modified Oxford Handicap Scale will be completed for all patients on day 28, hospital discharge or death whichever is sooner Patients will then be followed up at 6 months by the study team, at which time an extended Glasgow Outcome Scale Questionnaire will be completed.
An amendment to the protocol is also being prepared to include assessment of blood coagulation by standard laboratory testing and viscoelastic methods.
- Conditions
- Traumatic Brain Injury, Deep Vein Thrombosis, Acute Lung Injury, Ventilator Associated Pneumonia
- Medical subject headings
- Brain Injuries, Traumatic, Venous Thrombosis, Acute Lung Injury, Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Incidence of proximal DVT by compression ultra sound
Alternate day compression ultra sound
Measured: within 72 hours of injury until day 10 post injury.
Secondary outcomes (7)
Incidence of Acute Lung Injury
PaO2:FiO2 <300 mmHg
Measured: Up to 10 days post injury
Incidence of Ventilator Associated Pneumonia
Hospitals in Europe Link for Infection Control through Surveillance/European Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (HELICS/ESDC) criteria
Measured: Up to 10 days post injury
Ventilator days in ICU
Days or part off that respiratory support was provided via endotracheal tube or tracheostomy
Measured: From day of injury until death whilst receiving ventilatory support or no longer requiring actively ventilation or respiratory support greater than the provision of continuous positive airways pressure (CPAP) via a tracheostomy, upto 6 months.
Length of Stay in ICU
Days or part off in ICU
Measured: From day of injury until day of death or discharge from ICU to a step down unit providing level 1 care or lower, upto 6 months.
Hospital Length of Stay
Days or part of in hospital
Measured: From day of injury until day of death or hospital discharge to a rehabilitation facility, nursing facility, or patient's home, assessed upto 6 months.
Modified Oxford Handicap Score
Functional Outcome- a score of 0 indicates no symptoms, 1 minor symptoms, 2 some restriction, 3 dependent, 4 fully dependent, and 5 death.
Measured: To be completed on day 28 after injury, hospital discharge or death whichever occurs first.
Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale
Functional Outcome - a score of 1 indicates death, 2 vegetative state, 3 lower severe disability, 4 upper severe disability, 5 lower moderate disability, 6 upper moderate disability, 7 lower good recovery , 8 upper good recovery.
Measured: 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 May 2019
- Study start28 Sep 2019
- Primary completion24 Sep 2023
- Study completion24 Sep 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Traumatic Brain InjuryStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 90 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- NHS Lothian
- Sponsor type
- Other government
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Jonathan Rhodes, NHS Lothian
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03937947
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- AC18105
- Other IDs
- WKR0-2018-0020, WKR0-2018-0020
- Acronym
- TARDIS
- Status last verified
- Sep 2024
- First submitted
- 26 Apr 2019
- Last updated
- 15 Nov 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: There is no plan to share data at present.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Nov 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Traumatic Brain Injury Associated Radiological Deep Venous Thrombosis Incidence and Significance
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03937947
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- TARDIS / AC18105
- Conditions
- Traumatic Brain Injury, Deep Vein Thrombosis, Acute Lung Injury, Ventilator Associated Pneumonia
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 90 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- NHS LothianOther government
- Study start
- 28 Sep 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 24 Sep 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 24 Sep 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 6 May 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Whilst deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is common following traumatic brain injury (TBI), optimal timing and safety of pharmacological prophylaxis is uncertain. Paradoxically the harm associated with the occurrence of is also unclear.
This study is an observational pilot that aims to define the incidence of proximal DVT in patients with moderate to severe TBI. It seeks prospectively to determine if there is an association between DVT and outcome. It also seeks to explore possible associations between the occurrence of DVT and the incidence of lung injury and/or ventilator associated pneumonia.
Detailed description
Deep Venous Thrombosis (DVT) is common following trauma and patients with TBI are at increased risk. In studies of TBI that screened for DVT in the proximal lower limb veins, the incidence is between 14 and 18%. Pharmacological thromboprophylaxis (PT) may be effective in reducing the incidence of DVT following TBI. However, there is a reluctance to commence it due to concerns about the risk of intracranial haematoma expansion and contusion enlargement. PT is therefore often delayed, exposing patients to potential risks and complications of DVT. Recent systematic reviews could not answer the question of when to commence PT as no high quality randomised controlled trials addressing this question have been conducted. The latest edition of the Brain Trauma Foundation Guidelines could not make a recommendation on this issue . A Delphi exercise involving the investigator's network of United Kingdom(UK) Eurotherm3235 study centres found that the leading concern of specialists in UK neurocritical care, that they felt required further study, was when to commence PT following moderate to severe TBI.
Paradoxically however, despite these concerns over the use of PT in this population of patients, evidence of harm associated with the confirmed presence of proximal DVT is not yet convincing. This has additional significance as without clear evidence of harm associated with DVT complicating TBI, trials to address the questions of safety and efficacy of earlier use of PT are difficult to design and unlikely to attract the necessary funding.
From a search of a trauma registry of patients at risk of DVT who underwent venous screening, in TBI patients the occurrence of DVT was associated with increased ventilator days (Mean (SD), 18.0 (14.9) vs. 9.3 (7.9) days for DVT vs. no DVT, p=0.014) and ICU length of stay (23.0 (14.5) vs. 13.1 (9.8) days for DVT vs. no DVT, p=0.006). Similar results were seen in a post hoc analysis of the EPO TBI trial. This was a randomised controlled trial (RCT) of the effect of erythropoietin (EPO) verses placebo on outcome following TBI. Repeated lower limb screening for the presence of DVT was conducted as part of the protocol. Both ventilator days (Median (IQR) 11 (6-17) vs. 8 (4-14) days for DVT vs. no DVT, p<0.001) and ICU length of stay (17 (11-22) vs. 12 (6-19) days DVT vs. no DVT, p<0.001). Good neurological outcome at 6 months was significantly less frequent in those that developed DVT (45.4 vs. 57.9% DVT vs. no DVT, p=0.01). Whilst these findings are clinically important they are the result of retrospective and post hoc analysis. They therefore require to be prospectively validated if they are to be accepted.
One possible explanation for an increase in ventilator dependency and ICU length of stay could be the occurrence of undiagnosed pulmonary emboli causing acute lung injury (ALI). The occurrence of ventilation perfusion mismatching, deterioration in arterial partial pressure: fraction inspired oxygen ratio (PaO2:FiO2) and radiological changes on chest x-ray, being interpreted as evidence of pulmonary infection. This is supported by local audit data from June to October 2017 which found that 37% of brain injured patients had a clinical diagnosis of ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP) and were treated with antibiotics but lacked subsequent microbiological confirmation. It is also possible that small pulmonary emboli might predispose to pulmonary infection, explaining why the incidence of ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP) remains high in this population (40%, in the same local audit) despite the adoption of measures which have lowered VAP rates in other critically ill patient groups.
Lung Brain "cross-talk" could link evidence of ALI to a negative impact on neurological outcome in these patients. A disproportionate increase in mortality in patients with TBI and ALI has been reported. This was greatly in excess of deaths attributable to pulmonary dysfunction. Similarly, in animal models, ALI was found to be associated with cognitive impairment, and biomarker/histological evidence of neuronal injury.
This is a prospective, potentially multi centre, observational pilot study that aims to determine the incidence of DVT after TBI. Patients admitted to an ICU within 72 hours of suffering a TBI will be eligible for inclusion. The study will run for 2 years with a 16 month recruitment period. Based on current activity in Edinburgh the investigators estimate that 50 to 60 patients will be eligible for recruitment over the course of the study. In order to ensure satisfactory recruitment, the investigators will also approach centres that have expressed an interest.
Once consent is obtained for the patient to be enrolled in the study, a compression ultrasound scan (USS) of both legs will be carried out as soon as possible so that the first USS is completed within 72 hours of injury. USS will be repeated on alternate days up to Day 10 from injury. Daily data collection will include information on the use of mechanical and pharmacological thromboprophylaxis, ventilator dynamics including FiO2 and PaO2, chest X ray reports, clinical and microbiological diagnosis of ventilator associated pneumonia, ventilator days and ICU and hospital length of stay. The Modified Oxford Handicap Scale will be completed for all patients on day 28, hospital discharge or death whichever is sooner Patients will then be followed up at 6 months by the study team, at which time an extended Glasgow Outcome Scale Questionnaire will be completed.
An amendment to the protocol is also being prepared to include assessment of blood coagulation by standard laboratory testing and viscoelastic methods.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 16 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Adults with moderate to severe TBI requiring critical care support.
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Age ≥ 16 years
- Admission to critical care
- moderate/severe, non-penetrating traumatic brain injury
- Abnormal brain CT Scan
- Post resuscitation Glasgow coma score (GCS) ≤12, or GCS motor component ≤5
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Normal brain CT scan
- Unlikely to survive for the next 24 hours in the opinion of the ICU Consultant or Consultant Neurosurgeon treating the patient
- Contra indication to normal prophylactic measures, including heparin, were indicated
- Known blood clotting disorder or thrombophilia
- Significant pelvic or lower limb trauma
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Incidence of proximal DVT by compression ultra sound
Time frame: within 72 hours of injury until day 10 post injury.
Alternate day compression ultra sound
7 secondary outcomes
Incidence of Acute Lung Injury
Time frame: Up to 10 days post injury
Incidence of Ventilator Associated Pneumonia
Time frame: Up to 10 days post injury
Ventilator days in ICU
Time frame: From day of injury until death whilst receiving ventilatory support or no longer requiring actively ventilation or respiratory support greater than the provision of continuous positive airways pressure (CPAP) via a tracheostomy, upto 6 months.
Length of Stay in ICU
Time frame: From day of injury until day of death or discharge from ICU to a step down unit providing level 1 care or lower, upto 6 months.
Hospital Length of Stay
Time frame: From day of injury until day of death or hospital discharge to a rehabilitation facility, nursing facility, or patient's home, assessed upto 6 months.
Modified Oxford Handicap Score
Time frame: To be completed on day 28 after injury, hospital discharge or death whichever occurs first.
Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale
Time frame: 6 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Nov 2024.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. There is no plan to share data at present.
Related trials for Traumatic Brain Injury
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in Traumatic Brain Injury Epileptogenesis Project (TRACK-TBI EPI)
Traumatic Brain Injury, Post-traumatic Epilepsy
Enrolling by invitationPhase 1
Pilot Safety and Exploratory Efficacy of PSC-05 for the Treatment of Chronic Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
RecruitingObservational study
Intracranial Pressure Monitoring in Moderate Traumatic Brain Injury
Moderate Traumatic Brain Injury
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Nanopulse Laser Therapy
TBI (Traumatic Brain Injury)
RecruitingObservational study
Effect of Different Intravenous Fluids on Post-operative Chronic Subdural Hematoma Size and Recurrence
Chronic Subdural Hematoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Traumatic Brain Injury and Deep Vein Thrombosis, run by NHS Lothian at 1 site in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Nov 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Incidence of proximal DVT by compression ultra sound (time frame: within 72 hours of injury until day 10 post injury.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Nov 2024.