AzTrials
AzTrials

Traumatic Brain InjuryTARDISNCT03937947

Traumatic Brain Injury Associated Radiological DVT Incidence and Significance Study

An observational study of Traumatic Brain Injury and Deep Vein Thrombosis, run by NHS Lothian at 1 site in United Kingdom.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Whilst deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is common following traumatic brain injury (TBI), optimal timing and safety of pharmacological prophylaxis is uncertain. Paradoxically the harm associated with the occurrence of is also unclear. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 16 years and older
How many people
90 participants
Where
1 siteUnited Kingdom
Study dates
28 Sep 2019to 24 Sep 2023
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 16 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: Adults with moderate to severe TBI requiring critical care support.

Who may be able to join

  • Age ≥ 16 years
  • Admission to critical care
  • moderate/severe, non-penetrating traumatic brain injury
  • Abnormal brain CT Scan
  • Post resuscitation Glasgow coma score (GCS) ≤12, or GCS motor component ≤5
  • Able to complete consent and first USS within 72 hours of injury

Who cannot join

  • Normal brain CT scan
  • Unlikely to survive for the next 24 hours in the opinion of the ICU Consultant or Consultant Neurosurgeon treating the patient
  • Contra indication to normal prophylactic measures, including heparin, were indicated
  • Known blood clotting disorder or thrombophilia
  • Significant pelvic or lower limb trauma
  • Malignancy
  • Pregnancy or recently post-partum

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United Kingdom1 site
  • Intensive Care Unit, Western General Hospital

    Edinburgh, Midlothian, EH42XU

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Official title: Traumatic Brain Injury Associated Radiological Deep Venous Thrombosis Incidence and Significance

Whilst deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is common following traumatic brain injury (TBI), optimal timing and safety of pharmacological prophylaxis is uncertain. Paradoxically the harm associated with the occurrence of is also unclear.

This study is an observational pilot that aims to define the incidence of proximal DVT in patients with moderate to severe TBI. It seeks prospectively to determine if there is an association between DVT and outcome. It also seeks to explore possible associations between the occurrence of DVT and the incidence of lung injury and/or ventilator associated pneumonia.

Read the detailed description

Deep Venous Thrombosis (DVT) is common following trauma and patients with TBI are at increased risk. In studies of TBI that screened for DVT in the proximal lower limb veins, the incidence is between 14 and 18%. Pharmacological thromboprophylaxis (PT) may be effective in reducing the incidence of DVT following TBI. However, there is a reluctance to commence it due to concerns about the risk of intracranial haematoma expansion and contusion enlargement. PT is therefore often delayed, exposing patients to potential risks and complications of DVT. Recent systematic reviews could not answer the question of when to commence PT as no high quality randomised controlled trials addressing this question have been conducted. The latest edition of the Brain Trauma Foundation Guidelines could not make a recommendation on this issue . A Delphi exercise involving the investigator's network of United Kingdom(UK) Eurotherm3235 study centres found that the leading concern of specialists in UK neurocritical care, that they felt required further study, was when to commence PT following moderate to severe TBI.

Paradoxically however, despite these concerns over the use of PT in this population of patients, evidence of harm associated with the confirmed presence of proximal DVT is not yet convincing. This has additional significance as without clear evidence of harm associated with DVT complicating TBI, trials to address the questions of safety and efficacy of earlier use of PT are difficult to design and unlikely to attract the necessary funding.

From a search of a trauma registry of patients at risk of DVT who underwent venous screening, in TBI patients the occurrence of DVT was associated with increased ventilator days (Mean (SD), 18.0 (14.9) vs. 9.3 (7.9) days for DVT vs. no DVT, p=0.014) and ICU length of stay (23.0 (14.5) vs. 13.1 (9.8) days for DVT vs. no DVT, p=0.006). Similar results were seen in a post hoc analysis of the EPO TBI trial. This was a randomised controlled trial (RCT) of the effect of erythropoietin (EPO) verses placebo on outcome following TBI. Repeated lower limb screening for the presence of DVT was conducted as part of the protocol. Both ventilator days (Median (IQR) 11 (6-17) vs. 8 (4-14) days for DVT vs. no DVT, p<0.001) and ICU length of stay (17 (11-22) vs. 12 (6-19) days DVT vs. no DVT, p<0.001). Good neurological outcome at 6 months was significantly less frequent in those that developed DVT (45.4 vs. 57.9% DVT vs. no DVT, p=0.01). Whilst these findings are clinically important they are the result of retrospective and post hoc analysis. They therefore require to be prospectively validated if they are to be accepted.

One possible explanation for an increase in ventilator dependency and ICU length of stay could be the occurrence of undiagnosed pulmonary emboli causing acute lung injury (ALI). The occurrence of ventilation perfusion mismatching, deterioration in arterial partial pressure: fraction inspired oxygen ratio (PaO2:FiO2) and radiological changes on chest x-ray, being interpreted as evidence of pulmonary infection. This is supported by local audit data from June to October 2017 which found that 37% of brain injured patients had a clinical diagnosis of ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP) and were treated with antibiotics but lacked subsequent microbiological confirmation. It is also possible that small pulmonary emboli might predispose to pulmonary infection, explaining why the incidence of ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP) remains high in this population (40%, in the same local audit) despite the adoption of measures which have lowered VAP rates in other critically ill patient groups.

Lung Brain "cross-talk" could link evidence of ALI to a negative impact on neurological outcome in these patients. A disproportionate increase in mortality in patients with TBI and ALI has been reported. This was greatly in excess of deaths attributable to pulmonary dysfunction. Similarly, in animal models, ALI was found to be associated with cognitive impairment, and biomarker/histological evidence of neuronal injury.

This is a prospective, potentially multi centre, observational pilot study that aims to determine the incidence of DVT after TBI. Patients admitted to an ICU within 72 hours of suffering a TBI will be eligible for inclusion. The study will run for 2 years with a 16 month recruitment period. Based on current activity in Edinburgh the investigators estimate that 50 to 60 patients will be eligible for recruitment over the course of the study. In order to ensure satisfactory recruitment, the investigators will also approach centres that have expressed an interest.

Once consent is obtained for the patient to be enrolled in the study, a compression ultrasound scan (USS) of both legs will be carried out as soon as possible so that the first USS is completed within 72 hours of injury. USS will be repeated on alternate days up to Day 10 from injury. Daily data collection will include information on the use of mechanical and pharmacological thromboprophylaxis, ventilator dynamics including FiO2 and PaO2, chest X ray reports, clinical and microbiological diagnosis of ventilator associated pneumonia, ventilator days and ICU and hospital length of stay. The Modified Oxford Handicap Scale will be completed for all patients on day 28, hospital discharge or death whichever is sooner Patients will then be followed up at 6 months by the study team, at which time an extended Glasgow Outcome Scale Questionnaire will be completed.

An amendment to the protocol is also being prepared to include assessment of blood coagulation by standard laboratory testing and viscoelastic methods.

Medical subject headings
Brain Injuries, Traumatic, Venous Thrombosis, Acute Lung Injury, Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Incidence of proximal DVT by compression ultra sound

    Alternate day compression ultra sound

    Measured: within 72 hours of injury until day 10 post injury.

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. Incidence of Acute Lung Injury

    PaO2:FiO2 <300 mmHg

    Measured: Up to 10 days post injury

  2. Incidence of Ventilator Associated Pneumonia

    Hospitals in Europe Link for Infection Control through Surveillance/European Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (HELICS/ESDC) criteria

    Measured: Up to 10 days post injury

  3. Ventilator days in ICU

    Days or part off that respiratory support was provided via endotracheal tube or tracheostomy

    Measured: From day of injury until death whilst receiving ventilatory support or no longer requiring actively ventilation or respiratory support greater than the provision of continuous positive airways pressure (CPAP) via a tracheostomy, upto 6 months.

  4. Length of Stay in ICU

    Days or part off in ICU

    Measured: From day of injury until day of death or discharge from ICU to a step down unit providing level 1 care or lower, upto 6 months.

  5. Hospital Length of Stay

    Days or part of in hospital

    Measured: From day of injury until day of death or hospital discharge to a rehabilitation facility, nursing facility, or patient's home, assessed upto 6 months.

  6. Modified Oxford Handicap Score

    Functional Outcome- a score of 0 indicates no symptoms, 1 minor symptoms, 2 some restriction, 3 dependent, 4 fully dependent, and 5 death.

    Measured: To be completed on day 28 after injury, hospital discharge or death whichever occurs first.

  7. Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale

    Functional Outcome - a score of 1 indicates death, 2 vegetative state, 3 lower severe disability, 4 upper severe disability, 5 lower moderate disability, 6 upper moderate disability, 7 lower good recovery , 8 upper good recovery.

    Measured: 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted6 May 2019
  2. Study start28 Sep 2019
  3. Primary completion24 Sep 2023
  4. Study completion24 Sep 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
90 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03937947
Sponsor's protocol ID
AC18105
Other IDs
WKR0-2018-0020, WKR0-2018-0020
Acronym
TARDIS
Status last verified
Sep 2024
First submitted
26 Apr 2019
Last updated
15 Nov 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: There is no plan to share data at present.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Traumatic Brain Injury and Deep Vein Thrombosis, run by NHS Lothian at 1 site in United Kingdom.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Nov 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Incidence of proximal DVT by compression ultra sound (time frame: within 72 hours of injury until day 10 post injury.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Nov 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in