AzTrials
AzTrials

HIV/AIDS and InfectionsNCT03938077

A Community-University Approach to Preventing HIV

A study testing Storytelling 4 Empowerment in people with HIV/AIDS and Infections and Drug Abuse, run by University of Michigan at 2 sites in United States.

Withdrawn

Withdrawn. The study stopped before anyone enrolled.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Examine the feasibility and acceptability of delivering the S4E intervention to 20 African-American youths between the ages 16-21 in Flint, Michigan. The investigators will examine the preliminary efficacy of the S4E intervention in improving the uptake of HIV self-testing immediately post-intervention. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 16 to 21 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
What is being tested?
Storytelling 4 Empowerment
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
0 participants
Where
2 sitesUnited States
Study dates
1 Oct 2019to 30 Nov 2019
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 16 to 21 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child, Adult

Who may be able to join

  • 16-21 years of age
  • Sexually Active
  • African American
  • Live in Flint Michigan

Who cannot join

  • Report of prior psychiatric hospitalization by adolescent
  • Visible cognitive impairment due to drug use

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

United States2 sites
  • University of Michigan

    Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109

  • YOUR Center

    Flint, Michigan, 48504

Other trials in United States

About this study

Examine the feasibility and acceptability of delivering the S4E intervention to 20 African-American youths between the ages 16-21 in Flint, Michigan. The investigators will examine the preliminary efficacy of the S4E intervention in improving the uptake of HIV self-testing immediately post-intervention.

Read the detailed description

HIV is a significant public health concern in the US, and African American youth (defined as the adolescent and young adults 16-21 years of age) are disproportionately affected. Furthermore, HIV risk behaviors, including substance use and sexual risk behaviors are prominent. Despite the disproportionately high rates of HIV infection and risk behaviors in youth, few youth report having ever been tested for HIV and many are not routinely screened for asymptomatic STIs as recommended by the Center for Disease Control. To address these significant public health concerns, a mobile-health (mHealth) intervention, Storytelling 4 Empowerment (S4E) was developed for health clinic settings. S4E has demonstrated high feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy among youth in clinic settings. The proposed research will determine the feasibility and acceptability of delivering S4E via near peers, as well as determine the preliminary efficacy of S4E to improve HIV self-testing immediately post-intervention in a community sample (n=20) of at-risk youth ages 16-21 living in Flint, Michigan by conducting a phase I, one-arm pilot study to examine the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of S4E in improving the uptake of HIV self-testing immediately post-intervention. A University-Community approach was taken to employ principles of Community Based Participatory Research (CBPR) to determine the accessibility and acceptability of S4E when delivered by Near Peers.

Being tested
Storytelling 4 Empowerment
Keywords
mHealth, prevention intervention, primary health care
Medical subject headings
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome, Infections, Substance-Related Disorders, Adolescent Behavior, Alcohol Drinking, Psychological Well-Being, Tobacco Use

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Storytelling 4 EmpowermentDevice

    S4E application was developed in collaboration with youth in Southeast Michigan. S4E aims to prevent and reduce HIV/STI risk behaviors, including drug use and sexual risk behaviors, and increase HIV testing among youth. Content produced for the application is based on scientific prevention principles in conjunction with youth input. To date, we have developed modules focused on youth alcohol \& drug use, HIV \& STIs, and tobacco prevention and cessation.

Study groups in NCT03938077
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
S4E App interventionExperimentalYouth will receive the S4E intervention via provided iPads. The intervention will last approximately 60. Content includes: (a) storytelling scenarios, (b) drug use and HIV/STI knowledge, (c) interactive activities, (d) increasing self-efficacy to prevent/reduce sexual and drug use risk behaviors and increase HIV self-testing, (e) Near Peer-youth communication, and (f) highlighting prevention principles. The youth will participate in a Near Peer-initiated prevention and risk reduction encounter which includes (a) reinforcement of HIV solutions that youth learned in the S4E app, (b) promotion of HIV self-tests, and (c) linkage to care and prevention services. Youth have the option to take a HIV self-test. We will determine the acceptability of youth disclosing their results to their Near Peer and linkage to resources. The research staff will also conduct in-depth qualitative interviews with both youth and Near Peer participants to assess feasibility and acceptability of S4E.
Receives: Device: Storytelling 4 Empowerment

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Lifetime HIV Testing

    At baseline we will assess binary outcome of participant's lifetime HIV testing and collect date of most recent HIV test using an item adapted from the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) Youth Behavior Risk Survey (YRBS). A sample question for youth is "Have you every been tested for HIV?". Responses consist of "1=Yes", "0=No", and "98=Refuse to Answer".

    Measured: Baseline

  2. HIV Self-Testing

    Immediately post-intervention, we will assess the binary outcome of HIV self-testing using items adopted from Lightfoot and colleagues (2018).

    Measured: Immediately post-intervention

  3. HIV Self-Test Results Disclosure

    Post-intervention we will asses the percentage of youth that disclose their HIV self-test results to the Near Peer.

    Measured: Immediately post-intervention

Secondary outcomes (14)
  1. Change in Sexual Risk Beliefs from baseline to immediately post-intervention

    Beliefs regarding sexual behaviors (e.g., intended sex, condom use, and other contraceptives) will be assessed. A sample question for the youth is, "Condoms help prevent pregnancy." Responses range from "1=Strongly disagree" to "5=Strongly Agree".

    Measured: baseline and immediatly post-intervention

  2. Change in Sexual Risk Attitudes from baseline to immediately post-intervention

    Attitudes about sexual behaviors (e.g., intended sex, condom use, and other contraceptives) will be assessed. A sample question for the youth is "If I used a condom, sex would not feel as good." Responses range from "1=Strongly disagree" to "5=Strongly Agree".

    Measured: baseline and immediatly post-intervention

  3. Change in Future intentions regarding sexual risk from baseline to immediately post-intervention

    Change in future intentions of sexual behaviors (e.g., intended sex, condom use, and other contraceptives) will be assessed. A sample question for the youth is, "How likely is it that you will decide to have sex in the next 90 days?"." Responses range from "1=Very Unlikely" to "5=Very Likely".

    Measured: baseline and immediatly post-intervention

  4. Linkage to Care and Prevention

    The percent of youth who are referred to substance use, mental health, and sexual health services will be assessed.

    Measured: immediately post-intervention

  5. Eligibility rates for the Near Peer

    During the recruitment period of Near Peers, we will monitor and record the percentage of potential near peer participants who meet eligibility criteria to be enrolled in the study.

    Measured: enrollment period pre-intervention

  6. Percent of Enrollment for Near Peer

    During the recruitment period of Near Peers, we will monitor and record the percentage of those potential near peers eligible to participate who decide to enroll in the study.

    Measured: enrollment period pre-intervention

  7. Intervention Completion Rates for Near Peer

    Immediately post intervention we will assess the rate of intervention completion of Near Peers.

    Measured: immediately-post intervention

  8. Eligibility rates for the Youth

    Immediately post-intervention, we will assess the percentage of participants who meet eligibility criteria for our study.

    Measured: enrollment period pre-intervention

  9. Percent of Enrollment for Youth

    We will assess the percentage of those youth eligible to participate who are enrolled in the study.

    Measured: enrollment period pre-intervention

  10. Intervention Completion Rates for Youth

    Immediately post intervention, we will assess the rate of intervention completion of youth participants.

    Measured: immediately post-intervention

  11. Near Peer Satisfaction of the S4E app: Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ)

    Satisfaction is defined as how much the Near Peer enjoyed using the app and will be measured by the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ). The CSQ is a eight item survey adapted from Larsen and colleagues (1979) that has been shown to be reliable and valid, and was previously used in a primary care intervention (Cordova et al., 2018). In our previous studies the alphas have ranged from 0.87 to 0.92. A sample question is "How would you rate the app you have received?". Responses range from "1=Poor" to "4=Excellent".

    Measured: immediately-post intervention

  12. Acceptability of S4E Session for Near Peer: Session Evaluation Form (SEF)

    Acceptability is defined as how much the Near Peer enjoyed the intervention and will be measured by the Session Evaluation Form (SEF). The SEF is a 13-item survey, modified from Harper and colleagues (2008), that has been shown to be reliable and valid, and was previously used in a primary care intervention (Cordova et al., 2018). In our previous studies the alpha of SEF was 0.89. A sample question is "The session was enjoyable". Responses range from "1=Strongly Agree" to "4=Strongly Disagree".

    Measured: immediately-post intervention

  13. Youth Satisfaction of the S4E app: Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ

    Satisfaction is defined as how much the youth enjoyed using the app and will be measured by the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ). The CSQ is a eight item survey adapted from Larsen and colleagues (1979) that has been shown to be reliable and valid, and was previously used in a primary care intervention (Cordova et al., 2018). In our previous studies the alphas have ranged from 0.87 to 0.92. A sample question is "How would you rate the app you have received?". Responses range from "1=Poor" to "4=Excellent".

    Measured: immediately-post intervention

  14. Acceptability of S4E Session for Youth: Session Evaluation Form (SEF)

    Acceptability is defined as how much the youth enjoyed the interview session and will be measured by the Session Evaluation Form (SEF). The SEF is a 13-item survey, modified from Harper and colleagues (2008), that has been shown to be reliable and valid, and was previously used in a primary care intervention (Cordova et al., 2018). In our previous studies the alpha of SEF was 0.89. A sample question is "The session was enjoyable". Responses Range from "1=Strongly Agree" to "4=Strongly Disagree".

    Measured: immediately-post intervention

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted6 May 2019
  2. Study start1 Oct 2019
  3. Primary completion30 Nov 2019
  4. Study completion30 Nov 2019

Why it stopped: Unfortunately, the co-PI and lead community partner relocated out of the target area. Therefore, recruiting participants from the target area was not feasible.

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Model description
To examine the preliminary efficacy of the S4E intervention in improving the uptake of HIV self-testing immediately post-intervention and the feasibility(e.g., enrollment rates, eligibility) and acceptability (e.g., satisfaction) of S4E .
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
0 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03938077
Sponsor's protocol ID
HUM00151011
Status last verified
Dec 2019
First submitted
15 Apr 2019
Last updated
10 Dec 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Cordova D, Alers-Rojas F, Lua FM, Bauermeister J, Nurenberg R, Ovadje L, Fessler K, Delva J, Salas-Wright CP, Council YL. The Usability and Acceptability of an Adolescent mHealth HIV/STI and Drug Abuse Preventive Intervention in Primary Care. Behav Med. 2018 Jan-Mar;44(1):36-47. doi: 10.1080/08964289.2016.1189396. Epub 2016 Jul 15.

    PubMed 27223646
  • Cordova D, Bauermeister JA, Fessler K, Delva J, Nelson A, Nurenberg R, Mendoza Lua F, Alers-Rojas F, Salas-Wright CP; Youth Leadership Council. A Community-Engaged Approach to Developing an mHealth HIV/STI and Drug Abuse Preventive Intervention for Primary Care: A Qualitative Study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2015 Dec 18;3(4):e106. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.4620.

    PubMed 26685288
  • Cordova D, Lua FM, Ovadje L, Fessler K, Bauermeister JA, Salas-Wright CP, Vaughn MG, Leadership Council Y. Adolescent Experiences of Clinician-Patient HIV/STI Communication in Primary Care. Health Commun. 2018 Sep;33(9):1177-1183. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2017.1339379. Epub 2017 Jul 7.

    PubMed 28686489

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Storytelling 4 Empowerment in people with HIV/AIDS and Infections and Drug Abuse, run by University of Michigan at 2 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Dec 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Lifetime HIV Testing (time frame: Baseline). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03938077, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Dec 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in