AzTrials
AzTrials

Peripheral Artery DiseaseREACH PVINCT03943160

Radial accEss for nAvigation to Your CHosen Lesion for Peripheral Vascular Intervention: REACH PVI

An observational study of Peripheral Artery Disease, run by Abbott Medical Devices at 6 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The objective of this study is to evaluate acute clinical results of orbital atherectomy (OA) via radial artery access, including complication rates and cost effectiveness. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Peripheral Artery Disease
What is being tested?
Diamondback 360 Extended Length Orbital Atherectomy System
Type of treatment
Medical device
How many people
50 participants
Where
6 sitesUnited States
Study dates
11 Jun 2019to 11 Dec 2019
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: All patients undergoing peripheral vascular intervention (PVI) via transradial access (TRA) and for whom TRA has been successfully achieved and peripheral lesion deemed appropriate for treatment via TRA per physician discretion.

Who may be able to join

  • Subject is ≥ 18 years
  • Subject is willing and able to sign the IRB-approved informed consent form (ICF)
  • Subject presents with a Rutherford Classification of 2 to 5
  • Subject has a positive Allen's Test
  • Subject to undergo peripheral angiography and/or PVI via TRA approach per physician discretion
  • Index Procedure Inclusion Criteria:
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Physician obtains successful radial artery access (Note: snuffbox access is allowed)
  • Target lesion appropriate (i.e. location/morphology) for OA treatment via TRA within target area
  • OAS use attempted (defined as ViperWire introduced into the body)

Who cannot join

  • Subject has no palpable radial artery on the planned access arm
  • Subject has a previous failed radial access attempt on planned access arm
  • Subject has a dialysis fistula on planned access arm
  • Subject has a known subclavian stenosis or occlusion
  • Subject has a previous subclavian stent or previous subclavian intervention
  • Subject has a shunt in the radial artery on the planned access arm
Show all 17Show fewer
  • Subject has evidence of osteomyelitis
  • Subject is currently participating in an investigational drug or device study
  • Subject is pregnant within the study period
  • Index Procedure Exclusion Criteria
  • Physician unable to obtain radial artery access
  • Physician determines TRA is not acceptable due to patient anatomy, lesion characteristics, and/or disease severity
  • OAS use not attempted (defined as ViperWire introduced into the body)
  • Prior to insertion of ViperWire:
  • Femoral access is obtained
  • Unsuccessful peripheral intervention
  • A reportable adverse event has occurred

Trial locations and contacts

6 sites in 1 country.

6 sites in 1 country

United States6 sites
  • Mercy Hospital, Springfield

    Chesterfield, Missouri, 63017

  • Cardiovascular Institute of the South - Lafayette General South West OBL

    Lafayette, Louisiana, 70506

  • Arkansas Heart Hospital

    Little Rock, Arkansas, 72211

  • Columbia University Medical Center/New York Presbyterian

    New York, New York, 10032

  • Sorin Medical, P.C.

    New York, New York, 10065

  • Arizona Cardiovascular Research Center

    Phoenix, Arizona, 85016

Other trials in United States

About this study

The objective of this study is to evaluate acute clinical results of orbital atherectomy (OA) via radial artery access, including complication rates and cost effectiveness.

Read the detailed description

The purpose of this study is to prospectively evaluate acute clinical outcomes of orbital atherectomy (OA) via transradial access (TRA) for treatment of peripheral artery disease (PAD) in lower extremity lesions.

Being tested
Diamondback 360 Extended Length Orbital Atherectomy System
Medical subject headings
Peripheral Arterial Disease

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Diamondback 360 Extended Length Orbital Atherectomy SystemDevice

    Also called Stealth 360 Extended Length Orbital Atherectomy System

    All patients undergoing peripheral vascular intervention (PVI) via transradial access (TRA) and for whom TRA has been successfully achieved and peripheral lesion deemed appropriate for treatment via TRA per physician discretion.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Procedural Success:

    Successful completion of OA (orbital atherectomy) treatment of target lesion via transradial access without serious transradial access (TRA) related events. Serious TRA related events consist of: Serious TRA site bleeding, serious TRA site hematoma, serious radial artery spasm, serious hand ischemia, stroke, Transient Ischemic Attach (TIA), Serious nerve damage, perforation, TRA site pseudoaneurysm.

    Measured: Participants were followed from the baseline procedure through the first site-specific standard of care follow-up visit (7-45 days post-procedure)

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Treatment Success:

    Treatment success is defined as <50% residual stenosis post-procedure and without significant angiographic complications without stent placement, or <30% residual stenosis post-procedure and without significant angiographic complications with stent placement.

    Measured: Participants were followed from baseline procedure through hospital discharge, an expected average of less than 24 hours

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted9 May 2019
  2. Study start11 Jun 2019
  3. Primary completion11 Dec 2019
  4. Study completion11 Dec 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
50 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03943160
Sponsor's protocol ID
CLN-0012-P
Acronym
REACH PVI
Status last verified
Jul 2023
First submitted
3 May 2019
Last updated
18 Jul 2023
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes

Publications

  • Lodha A, Giannopoulos S, Sumar R, Ratcliffe J, Gorenchtein M, Green P, Rollefson W, Stout CL, Armstrong EJ. Transradial Endovascular Intervention: Results From the Radial accEss for nAvigation to Your CHosen Lesion for Peripheral Vascular Intervention (REACH PVI) Study. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2022 Mar;36:115-120. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2021.05.011. Epub 2021 May 15.

    PubMed 34020900

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Peripheral Artery Disease, run by Abbott Medical Devices at 6 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 17 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Jul 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 6 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 3 Mar 2021). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Procedural Success: (time frame: Participants were followed from the baseline procedure through the first site-specific standard of care follow-up visit (7-45 days post-procedure)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03943160, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Jul 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in