Cerebrovascular AccidentNCT03944486
On-Track Feasibility Study of a Rehabilitation System for Stroke Patients
A study testing Feasibility of OnTrack in people with Cerebrovascular Accident, run by Imperial College London at 1 site in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
Feasibility study of On-Track - a digital system for upper limb rehabilitation after stroke. Population - stroke patients over 18 years old. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Cerebrovascular Accident
- What is being tested?
- Feasibility of OnTrack
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 24 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- 13 Aug 2019to 31 Mar 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Adults (aged 18 or over).
- Stroke diagnosis less than 6 months previously (first or recurrent). Some participants will be recruited from an in-patient rehabilitation ward, hence the 6-month poststroke limit.
- Arm impairment of any type or level (including weakness-including dense hemiplegia, neglect and sensory deficits). This enables better understanding of which impairment level groups could benefit or not from using the intervention, especially considering the impact it may have on people's motivation regardless of their level of impairment.
- Ability to provide informed consent.
- Reliability to communicate (verbally or non-verbally) and understand English.
- Ability to read a predefined short message.
Who cannot join
- Unstable medical condition.
- Self-reported 'severe' pain in the arm affected either at rest or during movement.
- Severe oedema in the arm affected by their stroke, judged by the consenting therapist.
- Known discharge plans to a hospital other than the recruitment site or residential care in less than 7 weeks (a small proportion of patients in in-patient rehab may be in hospital for up to 12 weeks).
- Participants who are unable to engage with the intervention for a period of more than 7 consecutive days will be reviewed in a case-by-case basis by the members of the team responsible for delivering the intervention to determine if study continuation is appropriate.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United Kingdom1 site
Imperial Collage NHS Healthcare Trust
London, W12 0HS
About this study
Official title: Feasibility Study of On-Track - a Digital System for Upper Limb Rehabilitation After Stroke
Feasibility study of On-Track - a digital system for upper limb rehabilitation after stroke.
Population - stroke patients over 18 years old.
Read the detailed description
TITLE Feasibility study of On Track - a digital system for upper limb rehabilitation after stroke
DESIGN \& METHODS Mixed methods
Aims Assess the feasibility of 'On-Track' (a new arm rehabilitation system), for use by patients, and therapists in stroke rehabilitation services.
OUTCOME MEASURES Various. (including functional and self-reported measures)
POPULATION Stroke survivors, their family/carers, clinicians, professionals and lay people working with stroke survivors.
ELIGIBILITY Participants will be stroke survivors, relatives/carers of stroke survivors, frontline healthcare workers who treat stroke survivors, managers responsible for stroke service provision and lay people with an involvement in stroke care/delivery.
Participants will be over 18.
DURATION 1- 2 years
- Conditions
- Cerebrovascular Accident
- Being tested
- Feasibility of OnTrack
- Keywords
- Cerebrovascular Accident
- Medical subject headings
- Stroke
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Feasibility of OnTrackDevice
Patients to use digital application- study assessed the feasibility of the application for patients and therapists.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| On-Track | Other | Stroke survivors receiving the OnTrack intervention for 12 weeks consisting of arm activity tracking and self-management coaching. Assessments are done before and after the intervention. Receives: Device: Feasibility of OnTrack |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Participants Finding the OnTrack Intervention Acceptable in Semi Structured Interviews
Semi structured interviews will involve gaining patients opinions on the strengths and weaknesses of OnTrack. Interviews determine whether participants found the intervention easy to use and acceptable and if it is fit for their rehabilitation needs.
Measured: Week 13
Number of Therapists Finding the OnTrack Intervention Acceptable in Semi Structured Interviews
To assess the feasibility of the study design and procedures. Semi structured interviews will aim to collect therapists opinions on the strengths and weaknesses of On-Track.
Measured: Week 13
Secondary outcomes (10)
Modified Rankin Scale
The modified Rankin Scale is the most prevalent functional outcome measure in contemporary stroke trials. The mRS quantifies disability using an ordinal hierarchical grading from 0 (no symptoms) to 5 (severe disability). A lower number indicates lower disability.
Measured: Baseline, follow-up (week 7), follow-up (week 13)
Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Upper Extremity (FMA-UE)
The Fugl-Meyer Assessment for upper extremity (FMA-UE) has been tested extensively, and is found to have excellent psychometric properties. It is considered to assess the body function according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF).
The FMA-UE is scored on a scale 0 - 66 points (a higher score indicates lower arm impairment) and is recommended as core measures to be used in every stroke recovery and rehabilitation trial.
Measured: Baseline, follow-up (week 7), follow-up (week 13)
Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)
The MoCA is a brief cognitive screening tool with high sensitivity and specificity for detecting mild cognitive impairment. The MoCA uses a 0-30 score scale and defines impairment as follows: score of 18-25=mild, 10-17=moderate and <10 = severe. A version of the test that can be applied remotely was used after the study went fully remote due to the Coronavirus pandemic; the remote version uses a 0-22 score and impairment as follows: 13-18=mild, 7-12=moderate, and <7 severe.
Measured: Baseline, follow-up (week 7), follow-up (week 13)
Unilateral Spatial Neglect (USN) (Aka Albert's Test)
Albert's Test is a screening tool used to detect the presence of unilateral spatial neglect (USN) in patients with stroke. In this test, a series of 40 black lines, each about 2 cm long, are randomly oriented on a sheet of white A4 size paper in 6 rows. The test sheet is presented to the patient at their midline. The examiner asks the patient to cross out all of the lines, and demonstrates what is required by crossing out the 5 central lines. The patient is encouraged to cross out all the lines until satisfied that they have all been crossed.
If any lines are left uncrossed, and more than 70% of uncrossed lines are on the same side as motor deficit, USN is indicated.
Measured: Baseline, follow-up (week 7), follow-up (week 13)
System Usability Scale (SUS)
The test is a simple, 10-item scale covering a variety of aspects of system usability, such as the need for support, training and complexity, and thus have a high level of face validity for measuring the usability of a system. The scale is from 0-100, a higher number signifies better usability.
Measured: Week 13
Patient Activation and Motivation (PAM) - Questionnaire 10 Short Questions
The Patient Activation Measure (PAM) is a 10-item survey that assesses a person's underlying knowledge, skills and confidence integral to managing his or her own health and healthcare.
PAM segments individuals into one of four activation levels along an empirically derived 100-point scale (0 min - 100 max, a higher score indicates a higher level of activation). Each level provides insight into an extensive array of health-related characteristics, including attitudes, motivators, and behaviors. Individuals in the lowest activation level do not yet understand the importance of their role in managing their own health, and have significant knowledge gaps and limited self-management skills. Individuals in the highest activation level are proactive with their health, have developed strong self- management skills, and are resilient in times of stress or change.
Measured: Baseline, follow-up (week 7), follow-up (week 13)
Motor Assessment Log (MAL) - Questionnaire
Structured interview intended to examine How Much and How Well the subject uses their more-affected arm outside of the laboratory setting. Standardized questions are asked about the amount of use of their more-affected arm (Amount Scale or AS) and the quality of their movement (How Well Scale or HW) during the functional activities. Two scales are printed on sheets of paper and are placed in front of the participant during test administration. Both scales range between 0 and 5 (half scores are possible, i.e. 0.5,1.5,2.5,3.5,4.5). Higher values represent a better outcome.
Measured: Baseline, follow-up (week 7), follow-up (week 13)
Visual Analogue Scale for Pain - Question
Ask patients to rate their arm pain on a scale of 0-10 (0 = no pain; 10 = unbearable pain)
Measured: Baseline, follow-up (week 7), follow-up (week 13)
Friends and Family Test
Asks patient if they would recommend the service they have just received to friends/family. The NHS Friends and Family Test (FFT) was created to help service providers and commissioners understand whether patients are happy with the service provided, or where improvements are needed. 5 point Likert scale questionnaire ranging from 1-5: 1 "extremely unlikely", 2 "unlikely", 3 "neither likely nor unlikely", 4 "likely", 5 "extremely likely", an "I don't know" option is also provided. Higher values represent better outcomes.
Measured: Week 13
EQ 5D 5L (Health Related Quality of Life)
Descriptive system using 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 possible values: 1 no problems, 2 slight problems, 3 moderate problems, 4 severe problems, and 5 extreme problems. Patient is asked to assign a value to each dimension. The digits for the 5 dimensions are combined into a 5-digit number describing the patient's health state. An index value is derived from the health state ranging from -0.285 (value of 5 on all dimensions) to 1 (value of 1 on all dimensions). Higher index values indicate better outcomes.
Measured: Baseline, week 7, week 13
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 May 2019
- Study start13 Aug 2019
- Primary completion31 Mar 2020
- Study completion31 Mar 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Cerebrovascular AccidentStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Imperial College LondonThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Device feasibility
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 24 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Imperial College London
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Ara Darzi, MD, Principal investigator, Imperial College London
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03944486
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 19SM5146
- Status last verified
- Feb 2024
- First submitted
- 29 Apr 2019
- Last updated
- 12 Mar 2024
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Taylor E, Fusari G, Darzi A, Jones F. Is a novel digital system for arm and hand rehabilitation suitable for stroke survivors? A qualitative process evaluation of OnTrack. BMJ Open. 2023 Aug 18;13(8):e062119. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062119.
PubMed 37597873Fusari G, Gibbs E, Hoskin L, Lawrence-Jones A, Dickens D, Fernandez Crespo R, Leis M, Crow J, Taylor E, Jones F, Darzi A. What is the feasibility and patient acceptability of a digital system for arm and hand rehabilitation after stroke? A mixed-methods, single-arm feasibility study of the 'OnTrack' intervention for hospital and home use. BMJ Open. 2022 Sep 28;12(9):e062042. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062042.
PubMed 36171046Fusari G, Gibbs E, Hoskin L, Dickens D, Leis M, Taylor E, Jones F, Darzi A. Protocol for a feasibility study of OnTrack: a digital system for upper limb rehabilitation after stroke. BMJ Open. 2020 Mar 23;10(3):e034936. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034936.
PubMed 32205375
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 Mar 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Feasibility Study of On-Track - a Digital System for Upper Limb Rehabilitation After Stroke
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03944486
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 19SM5146
- Conditions
- Cerebrovascular Accident
- Keywords
- Cerebrovascular Accident
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 24 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Imperial College LondonUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust
- Study start
- 13 Aug 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Mar 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Mar 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 9 May 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 29 Mar 2022
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Feasibility study of On-Track - a digital system for upper limb rehabilitation after stroke.
Population - stroke patients over 18 years old.
Detailed description
TITLE Feasibility study of On Track - a digital system for upper limb rehabilitation after stroke
DESIGN \& METHODS Mixed methods
Aims Assess the feasibility of 'On-Track' (a new arm rehabilitation system), for use by patients, and therapists in stroke rehabilitation services.
OUTCOME MEASURES Various. (including functional and self-reported measures)
POPULATION Stroke survivors, their family/carers, clinicians, professionals and lay people working with stroke survivors.
ELIGIBILITY Participants will be stroke survivors, relatives/carers of stroke survivors, frontline healthcare workers who treat stroke survivors, managers responsible for stroke service provision and lay people with an involvement in stroke care/delivery.
Participants will be over 18.
DURATION 1- 2 years
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Device feasibility
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| On-Track | Other | Device: Feasibility of OnTrackStroke survivors receiving the OnTrack intervention for 12 weeks consisting of arm activity tracking and self-management coaching. Assessments are done before and after the intervention. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Adults (aged 18 or over).
- Stroke diagnosis less than 6 months previously (first or recurrent). Some participants will be recruited from an in-patient rehabilitation ward, hence the 6-month poststroke limit.
- Arm impairment of any type or level (including weakness-including dense hemiplegia, neglect and sensory deficits). This enables better understanding of which impairment level groups could benefit or not from using the intervention, especially considering the impact it may have on people's motivation regardless of their level of impairment.
- Ability to provide informed consent.
- Reliability to communicate (verbally or non-verbally) and understand English.
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Unstable medical condition.
- Self-reported 'severe' pain in the arm affected either at rest or during movement.
- Severe oedema in the arm affected by their stroke, judged by the consenting therapist.
- Known discharge plans to a hospital other than the recruitment site or residential care in less than 7 weeks (a small proportion of patients in in-patient rehab may be in hospital for up to 12 weeks).
- Participants who are unable to engage with the intervention for a period of more than 7 consecutive days will be reviewed in a case-by-case basis by the members of the team responsible for delivering the intervention to determine if study continuation is appropriate.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Feasibility of OnTrackPatients to use digital application- study assessed the feasibility of the application for patients and therapists. | Device | On-Track |
Primary outcome
Number of Participants Finding the OnTrack Intervention Acceptable in Semi Structured Interviews
Time frame: Week 13
Semi structured interviews will involve gaining patients opinions on the strengths and weaknesses of OnTrack. Interviews determine whether participants found the intervention easy to use and acceptable and if it is fit for their rehabilitation needs.
Number of Therapists Finding the OnTrack Intervention Acceptable in Semi Structured Interviews
Time frame: Week 13
To assess the feasibility of the study design and procedures. Semi structured interviews will aim to collect therapists opinions on the strengths and weaknesses of On-Track.
10 secondary outcomes
Modified Rankin Scale
Time frame: Baseline, follow-up (week 7), follow-up (week 13)
Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Upper Extremity (FMA-UE)
Time frame: Baseline, follow-up (week 7), follow-up (week 13)
Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)
Time frame: Baseline, follow-up (week 7), follow-up (week 13)
Unilateral Spatial Neglect (USN) (Aka Albert's Test)
Time frame: Baseline, follow-up (week 7), follow-up (week 13)
System Usability Scale (SUS)
Time frame: Week 13
Patient Activation and Motivation (PAM) - Questionnaire 10 Short Questions
Time frame: Baseline, follow-up (week 7), follow-up (week 13)
Motor Assessment Log (MAL) - Questionnaire
Time frame: Baseline, follow-up (week 7), follow-up (week 13)
Visual Analogue Scale for Pain - Question
Time frame: Baseline, follow-up (week 7), follow-up (week 13)
Friends and Family Test
Time frame: Week 13
EQ 5D 5L (Health Related Quality of Life)
Time frame: Baseline, week 7, week 13
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 Mar 2024.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37597873Taylor E, Fusari G, Darzi A, Jones F. Is a novel digital system for arm and hand rehabilitation suitable for stroke survivors? A qualitative process evaluation of OnTrack. BMJ Open. 2023 Aug 18;13(8):e062119. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062119.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36171046Fusari G, Gibbs E, Hoskin L, Lawrence-Jones A, Dickens D, Fernandez Crespo R, Leis M, Crow J, Taylor E, Jones F, Darzi A. What is the feasibility and patient acceptability of a digital system for arm and hand rehabilitation after stroke? A mixed-methods, single-arm feasibility study of the 'OnTrack' intervention for hospital and home use. BMJ Open. 2022 Sep 28;12(9):e062042. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062042.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32205375Fusari G, Gibbs E, Hoskin L, Dickens D, Leis M, Taylor E, Jones F, Darzi A. Protocol for a feasibility study of OnTrack: a digital system for upper limb rehabilitation after stroke. BMJ Open. 2020 Mar 23;10(3):e034936. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034936.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Cerebrovascular Accident
Not yet recruiting
Temporal Interference Stimulation for Upper-Limb Motor Recovery in Early Subacute Stroke
Acute Ischemic Stroke
RecruitingObservational study
ELATE Study: Evaluating Large-vessel Acute Thrombectomy in Extended Time Window
Acute Ichemic Stroke
Recruiting
Web-Based Tele-Rehabilitation Using Action Observation and Mirror Therapy for Subacute Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Stroke, Upper Extremity Paresis
Recruiting
Early Motor-Cognitive Integrative Training on Cognitive and Motor Performance in Patients With Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
Subarachnoid Aneurysm Hemorrhage
Not yet recruiting
Selective Intra-Arterial Hypothermia After Endovascular Treatment for Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion
Acute Ischemic Stroke, Basilar Artery Occlusion
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Ara Darzi, MD principal investigator
Imperial College London
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Feasibility of OnTrack in people with Cerebrovascular Accident, run by Imperial College London at 1 site in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Mar 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 29 Mar 2022). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Participants Finding the OnTrack Intervention Acceptable in Semi Structured Interviews (time frame: Week 13). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03944486, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Mar 2024.