AzTrials
AzTrials

HealthyNCT03945552

Pediatric Parenting Support in Flint

A study testing Video Interaction Project in people with Healthy and Family Research, run by NYU Langone Health at 2 sites in United States.

Active, not recruiting

Under way, not looking for participants. Everyone needed has enrolled. The study is still running.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Public health disasters have disproportionate impacts on low income communities, through pathways that add to those of poverty and associated stressors, and act over extended periods. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any ageHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Healthy, Family Research
What is being tested?
Video Interaction Project
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
486 participants
Where
2 sitesUnited States
Study dates
23 Jul 2019to 10 May 2027
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Infant is receiving pediatric care at Hurley Children's Clinic
  • Caregiver can be contacted (has a working phone)
  • Infant is three months old or younger at time of enrollment

Who cannot join

  • Infant very low birth weight (<1500gm)
  • Infant born in non-singleton birth (twin, triplet, etc.)
  • Infant has known or suspected significant genetic syndrome or malformation
  • Infant has other significant medical or developmental complication or risk (e.g., known neurodevelopmental/neuromuscular disorder likely to affect development)
  • Parent/legal guardian not present with infant at visit and/or unable to provide consent
  • Parent/legal guardian is not English speaking
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Parent/legal guardian with known significant impairment that will be barrier to communication and participation (e.g., intellectual disability, schizophrenia)
  • Parent/legal guardian has previously participated in VIP intervention with another child
  • Not planning to stay in Flint area for at least 3 years

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

United States2 sites
  • Hurley Children's Hospital

    Flint, Michigan, 10016

  • New York University School of Medicine

    New York, New York, 10016

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Universal Strengths-Based Parenting Support in Pediatric Health Care for Families With Very Young Children Following the Flint Water Crisis

Public health disasters have disproportionate impacts on low income communities, through pathways that add to those of poverty and associated stressors, and act over extended periods. Very young children are highly vulnerable to long-term impacts on development and mental health in the context of parenting challenges following disasters, yet frequently receive the least attention and resources. This study will test the role of universal parenting support in enhancing young children's development and mental health in Flint, Michigan following the Flint Water Crisis.

Read the detailed description

There are three specific aims of this study: Specific Aim 1: Characterize participants' experience of the FWC using ecological (neighborhood-level), geocoded STYH data, ecological indicators of water quality and parent self-report measures. These metrics will be obtained from Speak to Your Health (STYH) survey, a biennial community survey including neighborhood-level measures of stress collected before, during and after the FWC. Specific Aim 2: Assess impacts of strengths-based parenting support (VIP) after a disaster compounding chronic poverty (FWC). Specific Aim 3: Assess variation in VIP impacts in relation to FWC experience.

Being tested
Video Interaction Project
Keywords
Parenting Practices, Parent-Child Relationships, Child Development

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Video Interaction ProjectBehavioural

    VIP is a strengths-based, family-centered intervention that uses pediatric well-child visits to enhance parenting practices/relationships and child development by promoting positive parenting practices such as pretend play, shared reading, and daily routines.

Study groups in NCT03945552
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
ControlNo interventionCare as usual
Video Interaction ProjectExperimentalVIP is a strengths-based, family-centered intervention that uses pediatric well-child visits to enhance parenting practices/relationships and child development by promoting positive parenting practices such as pretend play, shared reading, and daily routines.
Receives: Behavioral: Video Interaction Project

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Parenting compensatory factors (Assets/vulnerabilities): Parenting Stress

    Parenting stress measured by Parent Survey (PS) with the Parenting Stress Index (PSI; α= .82) short form parental distress subscale, range 12-60, higher scores worse.

    Measured: 6 months to 4 years

  2. Positive Parenting Activities

    Positive parenting practices measured by parent survey (PS) with the StimQ2's core subscales: Reading (READ), Teaching (Parental Involvement in Developmental Advance), and Responsivity (Parental Verbal Responsivity) Subscales. The StimQ2 is a structured interview. The three subscales are summed to obtain a total score. Total scores can range from 0 to 42 (infant)/46 (toddler)/60 (preschool). Higher score better.

    Measured: 6 months to 4 Years

  3. Parent-child Interaction and relationship

    Laboratory observation of semi-structured interactions with real time Parenting Interactions with Children: Checklist of Observations Linked to Outcome (PICCOLO), and Adult-Child Interactive Reading Inventory (ACIRI) coding.

    Measured: 6 months to 4 Years

  4. Child Expressive and Receptive Language Development

    Measured through direct assessment of child using the Mullen Scales of Early Learning. The Mullen provides standardized scores (M=50, SD=10). Higher scores better.

    Measured: 6 months to 4 Years

  5. Child Social-Emotional Development

    Measured by parent survey (PS) using the Infant-Toddler Social Emotional Assessment (ITSEA). ITSEA is a structured interview that measures 4 domains. Items have a 3-point response scale. Subscales are scored by taking the average of items, and subscales are then added to create an overall score. Scores are standardized on a T-distribution (M=50, SD=10). Higher scores worse, except for Competence domain.

    Measured: 18 months to 4 years

Secondary outcomes (10)
  1. Parent Self-Efficacy Measured by the Parent Reading Beliefs Inventory (PRBI)

    Self-efficacy measured by parent survey (PS) using the Parent Reading Beliefs Inventory (PRBI), Teaching Efficacy subscale (α=.73). PRBI is a structured interview. Items are rated on a 1 to 4 Likert scale. Scores for Teaching Efficacy range from 9 to 36. Higher scores are better.

    Measured: birth to 4 years

  2. Parent Self-Efficacy Measured by the Parenting Self Agency Measure (PSAM)

    Parenting self-agency measured by PS using the Parenting Self-Agency Measure (PSAM). PSAM is a 5-item questionnaire, with items rated from 1 to 5. Scores range from 5 to 25. Higher scores are better

    Measured: birth to 4 years

  3. Parent Self-Efficacy Measured by Resiliency (RSA)

    Resiliency measured using the Resiliency Scale for Adults (RSA), Personal Strength and Social Resources subscales. RSA items are scored on a 1 to 5 Likert scale. Subscale scores are averaged across items. Higher scores are better.

    Measured: birth to 4 years

  4. Parenting compensatory factors: Planning and Organization

    Feeding, sleeping, media routines and screen time measured by parent survey (PS) using an internal survey (PI Mendelsohn; kappa 0.91).

    Measured: 6 months to 4 years

  5. Parenting compensatory factors: Parenting Interaction Skills and Resources

    Play coded video for VIP-promoted skills measured using VIP observation checklist

    Measured: 6 months to 4 years

  6. Parent-child interactions and relationship

    Laboratory observation of semi-structured interactions with subsequent global coding using the Caregiver-Child Affect, Responsivity, and Engagement Scale (C-CARES) and the Parent Child early Relational Assessment (PCERA)

    Measured: 6 months to 4 years

  7. Naturalistic assessment of parent-child interaction

    LENA Home (adult words, conversational turns)

    Measured: 6 months to 4 years

  8. Negative Parenting Practices

    Socolar Discipline Survey (α= .56-.82) will be used to assess harsh discipline punishment. Answers range from 1 (never) to 6 (always), where a higher score indicates great frequency of harsh discipline. A total score is calculated from the sum of all items.

    Measured: 6 months to 4 years

  9. Child naturalistic language/narrative development

    Laboratory observation of naturalistic assessment of child language/narrative

    Measured: 18 months to 4 years

  10. Child self-regulation

    Direct observation using subset of executive function (EF) battery for 3-year olds from S.M. Carlson - Dimensional Card Sort (3 incompatible test trials, scored 0/1), Fruit Stroop (mismatched fruit; 3 trials, scored 0-2), and Bear/Dragon: Go/No Go (10 trials, scored 0/1).

    Laboratory observation of child regulation during assessment using the Preschool Self-Regulation Assessment (PSRA).

    Measured: 18 months to 4 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted10 May 2019
  2. Study start23 Jul 2019
  3. Primary completion10 May 2027 (estimated)
  4. Study completion10 May 2027 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Approximately 600 potential infant/parent dyads screened for inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
486 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03945552
Sponsor's protocol ID
18-01347
Other IDs
R01HD096909-01A1
Status last verified
Dec 2025
First submitted
8 May 2019
Last updated
3 Dec 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Given that the proposed research methodology will take place in a community (Flint, MI) with ongoing institutional mistrust following the onset of a community-level disaster (the Flint Water Crisis), the investigators are committed to developing a plan for data sharing that will meet NIH's data sharing requirements while simultaneously meeting the needs of this community. The investigators will work together with the Michigan State University Pediatric Public Health Initiative and its community partners to develop a plan for data sharing that addresses these diverse and important considerations.

Publications

  • Roby E. Erin Roby: ECI biocommentary. Pediatr Res. 2026 May 13. doi: 10.1038/s41390-026-05093-2. Online ahead of print.

    PubMed 42129365
  • Roby E, O'Connell LK, Griffin MG, Guevara VA, Aviles AI, Larkins BC, Guyon-Harris KL, Hunter LJ, McLoughlin M, Ndee C, Vaca-Condado L, Canfield CF, Miller EB, Mendelsohn AL, Morris-Perez PA, Shaw DS, Gross RS. Promoting early relational health and resilience in pediatric primary care: a qualitative study. Pediatr Res. 2026 Mar 15:10.1038/s41390-026-04842-7. doi: 10.1038/s41390-026-04842-7. Online ahead of print.

    PubMed 41833975
  • Chen Y, Canfield CF, Finegood ED, Gutierrez J, Williams S, O'Connell LK, Mendelsohn A. Family stress model and parenting in infancy: Social support and parenting self-efficacy as resilience factors. J Fam Psychol. 2025 Dec;39(8):1129-1140. doi: 10.1037/fam0001341. Epub 2025 Aug 14.

    PubMed 40811117

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Video Interaction Project in people with Healthy and Family Research, run by NYU Langone Health at 2 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Dec 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Parenting compensatory factors (Assets/vulnerabilities): Parenting Stress (time frame: 6 months to 4 years). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03945552, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Dec 2025; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 26 Oct 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in