Tibial Shaft FractureIMVEXNCT03945669
Intramedullary Nailing vs External Ring Fixation for the Treatment of Tibial Shaft Fractures
A study testing Intramedullary Nailing and External Ring fixation in people with Tibial Shaft Fracture, run by Aalborg University Hospital at 3 sites in Denmark.
Trial summary
This study is a multicenter pragmatic assessor blinded randomized and prospective clinical trial in which standard intramedullary nailing is compared with external ring fixator for patients with tibial shaft fractures. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Tibial Shaft Fracture
- What is being tested?
- Intramedullary Nailing and External Ring fixation
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 67 participants
- Where
- 3 sitesDenmark
- Study dates
- 1 Nov 2019to 24 Jun 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Fracture of the tibial shaft
- OTA classification Type: 42-A1-A3, -B1-B3 and -C1-C3
- The fracture type is deemed operable by intramedullary nail
Who cannot join
- Below 18 years of age
- Open fracture
- History of severe systemic diseases or cancer
- Bilateral tibial shaft fracture
- Multi fracture patients
- Pregnancy
- Patients without gait function prior to fracture
Trial locations and contacts
3 sites in 1 country.
Denmark3 sites
Aalborg University Hospital, Department of orthopaedic surgery
Aalborg, 9000
Aarhus University Hospital
Aarhus, 8000
Regional Hospital Viborg
Viborg, 8800
About this study
Official title: Intramedullary Nailing Versus External Ring Fixation for Surgical Treatment of Tibial Shaft Fractures in Adults and Their One Year Outcome on Recovery: Study Protocol for a Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial (The IMVEX Trial)
This study is a multicenter pragmatic assessor blinded randomized and prospective clinical trial in which standard intramedullary nailing is compared with external ring fixator for patients with tibial shaft fractures.
Read the detailed description
This study is a multicenter pragmatic assessor blinded randomized and prospective clinical trial in which standard intramedullary nailing is compared with external ring fixator for patients with tibial shaft fractures.
The primary aim of the project is to compare the one-year Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score - Sport (KOOS-Sport) after standard intramedullary nailing with external ring fixation for patients with tibial shaft fractures.
The explorative aim is to report the effect of the two surgical procedures on the development of complications, time to bone union, pain reactions, muscle strength, activity of daily living and time to return to work.
- Conditions
- Tibial Shaft Fracture
- Being tested
- Intramedullary Nailing, External Ring fixation
- Keywords
- External ring fixation, Intramedullary nailing, Tibial shaft fracture, patient reported outcome
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Intramedullary NailingProcedure or surgery
fracture fixation of the tibial shaft fracture with an intramedullary nail.
External Ring fixationProcedure or surgery
fracture fixation of the tibial shaft fracture with an external ring fixator.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intramedullary Nail | Active comparator | Intramedullary Nailing: Alignment will be obtained by closed or limited open reduction of the fracture. A standard reamed intramedullary nail is inserted. Access above the patella, through the patella tendon or parapatellar access is used according to surgeon preferences. One or more cortical screws may be used if deemed appropriate due to fracture pattern. Patients are administered preoperative antibiotics (Dicloxacillin) 15 minutes before surgery commences. Postoperative antibiotics is administered by discretion of the surgeon based on individual patient considerations. Receives: Procedure: Intramedullary Nailing |
| External Ring fixator | Experimental | External Ring fixation: Closed or limited open reduction of the fracture is performed. A circular frame is attached on both sides of the fracture. Connection to the bone is obtained by hydroxyapatite coated half pins and/or k-wires with olives as needed according to surgeon preferences. One or more cortical screws may be used if deemed appropriate due to fracture pattern. After applying the ring fixator alignment is assessed radiologically and corrected both peri- and postoperatively. Patients are administered preoperative antibiotics (Dicloxacillin) preoperatively 15 minutes before surgery commences. Following surgery antibiotics are continued until wounds, pin- and wire perforations are dry. Receives: Procedure: External Ring fixation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score - sport (KOOS Sport)
KOOS-sport is a standardized and validated patient-reported instrument used in order to assess knee and knee associated problems with regards to activity. The subscale sport is one five subscales: pain, ADL, symptoms, sport and QOL in the KOOS questionnaire . A total score of 100 indicates no symptoms, and 0 indicates major symptoms.
Measured: 12 month follow up
Secondary outcomes (13)
Perceived Pain
Development in pain in the two groups will be recorded by patient-reported pain intensity measured on a 10 cm visual analogue scale (VAS) with endpoints "no pain" and "maximal pain" for the worst pain during the last 24 hours and resting pain.
Measured: 6 weeks, 3+6+12 months
Patient-reported pain reactions
Pain DETECT questionnaire. The painDETECT screening questionnaire (PD-Q), uses a scoring method between - 1 and 38 to estimate the likelihood of a neuropathic pain component in patients.
Measured: 6 weeks, 3+6+12 months
Pain sensitivity
Pain sensitivity will be assessed by pressure pain thresholds (PPTs) recorded by handheld pressure algometry (Algometer Type II, Somedic AB, Sweden).
Measured: 6 weeks, 3+6+12 months
Muscle strength
Isometric muscle strength in the two groups will be measured by a strap-mounted dynamometer attached to the wall (Mecmesin AFG2500, Mecmesin Ltd, West Sussex, UK). Girth measures of thigh and calf will be used to examine muscle atrophy and/or effusion
Measured: 6+12 months
Time to bone union
Bone union, in the two surgical groups will be evaluated on standard AP and side X-rays of the fractured leg. The evaluation of bone union will be defined as: i) visible callus formation on at least three of four sides, no visible fracture line and no pain from fracture site at weight-bearing and during clinical examination.
Measured: 6 weeks, 3+6+12 months
Radiological alignment
Alignment of the tibia will be evaluated using the EOS scanning system.
Measured: 6 weeks, 3+6+12 months
Health related QOL
Eq5D-5L is a standardized questionnaire developed to assess general health outcome (29). It consists of five dimensions: Mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression, and a self-rated health scale on a 20 cm vertical, visual analogue scale with endpoints labelled 'the best health you can imagine' and 'the worst health you can imagine'. An Eq5d-5L index of 1.0 indicated full health, 0 death, and -0.59 denoted a condition worse than death
Measured: 6 weeks, 3+6+12 months
Time to return to work
Measure the time from surgery to end of sick leave measured in days.
Measured: 6 weeks, 3+6+12 months
Health economic evaluation
Measure the cost of treatment in the two groups within the first year following surgery
Measured: 12 months
Gait assessment
Gait asymmetries will be measured with patients walking on a pressure-sensitive mat.
Measured: 3+6+12 months
Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS)
This instrument evaluate when the patient reaches a acceptable patient observed pain and function level, where the patient no longer demands treatment
Measured: 3+6+12 months
The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)
KOOS is a standardized and validated patient-reported instrument used in order to assess knee and knee associated problems.The questionnaire includes five subscales: pain, ADL, symptoms, sport and QOL. A total score of 100 indicates no symptoms, and 0 indicates major symptoms.
Measured: 6 weeks, 3+6+12 months
Foot And Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS)
FAOS is a standardized and validated patient-reported instrument used in order to assess foot and ankle associated problems divided into 5 subscales. The questionnaire includes five subscales: pain, ADL, symptoms, sport and QOL. A total score of 100 indicates no symptoms, and 0 indicates major symptoms.
Measured: 6 weeks, 3+6+12 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 May 2019
- Study start1 Nov 2019
- Primary completion24 Jun 2024
- Study completion24 Jun 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Tibial Shaft FractureStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Aalborg University HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- This study is a multicenter pragmatic assessor blinded randomized and prospective clinical trial.
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 67 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Aalborg University Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Danish Council for Independent Research
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Rasmus Elsøe, Aalborg University Hospital
- Investigators
- Rasmus Elsøe, PhD, Study director, Aalborg University HospitalRasmus Stokholm, MD, Principal investigator, Aalborg University HospitalPeter Larsen, PhD, Principal investigator, Aalborg University Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03945669
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- LERG1
- Acronym
- IMVEX
- Status last verified
- Jun 2024
- First submitted
- 3 May 2019
- Last updated
- 25 Jun 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Larsen P, Stokholm R, Rolfing JD, Petruskevicius J, Rasmussen MK, Jensen SS, Elsoe R. Intramedullary nailing versus external ring fixation for tibial shaft fractures: an explorative analysis of muscle strength from the IMVEX trial. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2025 Jul 18;145(1):379. doi: 10.1007/s00402-025-05995-6.
PubMed 40679543
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 25 Jun 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Intramedullary Nailing Versus External Ring Fixation for Surgical Treatment of Tibial Shaft Fractures in Adults and Their One Year Outcome on Recovery: Study Protocol for a Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial (The IMVEX Trial)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03945669
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IMVEX / LERG1
- Conditions
- Tibial Shaft Fracture
- Keywords
- External ring fixation, Intramedullary nailing, Tibial shaft fracture, patient reported outcome
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 67 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Aalborg University HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Danish Council for Independent Research
- Study start
- 1 Nov 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 24 Jun 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 24 Jun 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 10 May 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study is a multicenter pragmatic assessor blinded randomized and prospective clinical trial in which standard intramedullary nailing is compared with external ring fixator for patients with tibial shaft fractures.
Detailed description
This study is a multicenter pragmatic assessor blinded randomized and prospective clinical trial in which standard intramedullary nailing is compared with external ring fixator for patients with tibial shaft fractures.
The primary aim of the project is to compare the one-year Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score - Sport (KOOS-Sport) after standard intramedullary nailing with external ring fixation for patients with tibial shaft fractures.
The explorative aim is to report the effect of the two surgical procedures on the development of complications, time to bone union, pain reactions, muscle strength, activity of daily living and time to return to work.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- This study is a multicenter pragmatic assessor blinded randomized and prospective clinical trial.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intramedullary Nail | Active comparator | Procedure: Intramedullary NailingIntramedullary Nailing: Alignment will be obtained by closed or limited open reduction of the fracture. A standard reamed intramedullary nail is inserted. Access above the patella, through the patella tendon or parapatellar access is used according to surgeon preferences. One or more cortical screws may be used if deemed appropriate due to fracture pattern. Patients are administered preoperative antibiotics (Dicloxacillin) 15 minutes before surgery commences. Postoperative antibiotics is administered by discretion of the surgeon based on individual patient considerations. |
| External Ring fixator | Experimental | Procedure: External Ring fixationExternal Ring fixation: Closed or limited open reduction of the fracture is performed. A circular frame is attached on both sides of the fracture. Connection to the bone is obtained by hydroxyapatite coated half pins and/or k-wires with olives as needed according to surgeon preferences. One or more cortical screws may be used if deemed appropriate due to fracture pattern. After applying the ring fixator alignment is assessed radiologically and corrected both peri- and postoperatively. Patients are administered preoperative antibiotics (Dicloxacillin) preoperatively 15 minutes before surgery commences. Following surgery antibiotics are continued until wounds, pin- and wire perforations are dry. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Fracture of the tibial shaft
- OTA classification Type: 42-A1-A3, -B1-B3 and -C1-C3
- The fracture type is deemed operable by intramedullary nail
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Below 18 years of age
- Open fracture
- History of severe systemic diseases or cancer
- Bilateral tibial shaft fracture
- Multi fracture patients
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Intramedullary Nailingfracture fixation of the tibial shaft fracture with an intramedullary nail. | Procedure or surgery | Intramedullary Nail |
| External Ring fixationfracture fixation of the tibial shaft fracture with an external ring fixator. | Procedure or surgery | External Ring fixator |
Primary outcome
The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score - sport (KOOS Sport)
Time frame: 12 month follow up
KOOS-sport is a standardized and validated patient-reported instrument used in order to assess knee and knee associated problems with regards to activity. The subscale sport is one five subscales: pain, ADL, symptoms, sport and QOL in the KOOS questionnaire . A total score of 100 indicates no symptoms, and 0 indicates major symptoms.
13 secondary outcomes
Perceived Pain
Time frame: 6 weeks, 3+6+12 months
Patient-reported pain reactions
Time frame: 6 weeks, 3+6+12 months
Pain sensitivity
Time frame: 6 weeks, 3+6+12 months
Muscle strength
Time frame: 6+12 months
Time to bone union
Time frame: 6 weeks, 3+6+12 months
Radiological alignment
Time frame: 6 weeks, 3+6+12 months
Health related QOL
Time frame: 6 weeks, 3+6+12 months
Time to return to work
Time frame: 6 weeks, 3+6+12 months
Health economic evaluation
Time frame: 12 months
Gait assessment
Time frame: 3+6+12 months
Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS)
Time frame: 3+6+12 months
The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)
Time frame: 6 weeks, 3+6+12 months
Foot And Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS)
Time frame: 6 weeks, 3+6+12 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 25 Jun 2024.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40679543Larsen P, Stokholm R, Rolfing JD, Petruskevicius J, Rasmussen MK, Jensen SS, Elsoe R. Intramedullary nailing versus external ring fixation for tibial shaft fractures: an explorative analysis of muscle strength from the IMVEX trial. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2025 Jul 18;145(1):379. doi: 10.1007/s00402-025-05995-6.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Tibial Shaft Fracture
Recruiting
MY01 Pressure Monitoring in Adolescent Tibia Fractures
Proximal Tibia Fracture, Tibial Shaft Fracture
RecruitingObservational study
Comparison of Knee Muscle Function After Suprapatellar and Infrapatellar Tibial Nailing in Patients With Tibial Shaft Fractures
Tibia Fractures
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Anterior Knee Pain and Patellar Tendon Elasticity After Infrapatellar Tendon-Split Tibial Intramedullary Nailing
Anterior Knee Pain, Patellar Tendon Disorder
Not yet recruiting
Rehabilitation After Lower Extremity Nailing Trial
Femoral Shaft Fracture, Tibial Shaft Fractures
Recruiting
Comparison of Functional Recovery Following Medial Parapatellar and Transpatellar Approaches for Intramedullary Nailing of Tibial Shaft Fractures
Tibial Shaft Fractures
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Rasmus Elsøe, PhD study director
Aalborg University Hospital
Rasmus Stokholm, MD principal investigator
Aalborg University Hospital
Peter Larsen, PhD principal investigator
Aalborg University Hospital
3 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Intramedullary Nailing and External Ring fixation in people with Tibial Shaft Fracture, run by Aalborg University Hospital at 3 sites in Denmark.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Jun 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 3 sites in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score - sport (KOOS Sport) (time frame: 12 month follow up). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03945669, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Jun 2024.