AzTrials
AzTrials

NeoplasmsNCT03945734

Expressive Helping for Chinese-Speaking Cancer Patients and Survivors

A study testing Expressive Helping in people with Neoplasms and Cancer, run by New York University at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study examines the feasibility, cultural-sensitivity, and health effects of the expressive helping intervention by conducting a single-arm trial with Chinese-speaking cancer patients and survivors. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Neoplasms, Cancer
What is being tested?
Expressive Helping
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
60 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
20 May 2019to 30 Dec 2020
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Diagnosis of cancer (any type)
  • Of Chinese descent
  • Over the age of 18
  • Can speaking and read Mandarin Chinese

Who cannot join

  • Completed primary cancer treatment more than five years ago

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • New York University

    New York, New York, 10003

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Feasibility of Expressive Helping for Chinese-Speaking Cancer Patients and Survivors

This study examines the feasibility, cultural-sensitivity, and health effects of the expressive helping intervention by conducting a single-arm trial with Chinese-speaking cancer patients and survivors.

Read the detailed description

This study examines whether expressive helping is feasible and culturally-sensitive for Chinese American cancer patients and survivors. For 20 minutes each week over four weeks, participants choose to write or voice-record their thoughts about cancer by following specific prompts designed to help them process their cancer experiences. During the last week of this reflection exercise, participants write or voice-record an anonymous letter to another Chinese cancer patient by sharing their cancer experience and providing advice and encouragement. Health outcomes are assessed at baseline, 1-month, and 3-month follow-ups. A subset of the participants will be invited to share their experiences with the study through qualitative interviews after the last writing/voice-recording session. This research study provides an opportunity for Chinese American cancer patients and survivors to express their feelings without the fear of burdening others, and give them an opportunity to help others by sharing their cancer experiences.

Conditions
Neoplasms, Cancer
Being tested
Expressive Helping
Medical subject headings
Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Expressive HelpingBehavioural

    Expressive helping harnesses the benefits of helping others (e.g., support giving) through writing or voice-recording. Expressive helping integrates two distinct areas of research showing that writing or speaking about ones' negative experiences and engaging in support giving behaviors can improve psychological well-being.

Study groups in NCT03945734
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Expressive HelpingExperimentalParticipants complete four 20-minute writing/voice-recording sessions spaced one week apart. During the first week, the instructions will explain that cancer patients and survivors benefit from learning about other cancer survivors' experiences. They are told that the first three weeks of writing/voice-recording (writing/talking about their stress and coping at Week 1, deepest emotions about cancer at Week 2, self-affirmation and benefit finding at Week 3) are exercises designed to help them think about their cancer experiences and to prepare them to write/record the narrative they would share on Week 4. During Week 4, they are asked to write/record a narrative as if they are speaking to another Chinese person with cancer, adding advice and encouragements, and reminded that their writing/recording would be shared with other Chinese American cancer patients and survivors.
Receives: Behavioral: Expressive Helping

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of participants screened

    The number of participants screened for eligibility will be counted.

    Measured: through study completion, an average of 1 year

  2. Compliance rate

    Compliance rate is calculated by dividing the number of writing/voice-recording sessions finished by the number of sessions assigned.

    Measured: through study completion, an average of 1 year

  3. Retention rate

    Retention rate is calculated by dividing the number of participants who began the study by the number of participants who finished the entire study.

    Measured: through study completion, an average of 1 year

  4. Meaningfulness of the study

    We will ask participants open-ended questions about whether they felt participating in this study was meaningful to them.

    Measured: This will be assessed approximately four weeks after the baseline

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Change in quality of life as assessed by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Scale (FACT).

    The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Scale (FACT) is a 27-item measure of health-related quality of life (Cella \& Tulsky,1993). This scale assesses contains four different subscales, including physical well-being (7 items), social well-being (7 items), emotional well-being (6 items), and functional well-being (7 items).

    Measured: Baseline; 1-month follow-up; 3-month follow-up

  2. Change in depressive symptoms as assessed by the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D).

    The CES-D (Radloff, 1977) is a 20-item measure of depressive symptoms.

    Measured: Baseline; 1-month follow-up; 3-month follow-up

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted10 May 2019
  2. Study start20 May 2019
  3. Primary completion30 Dec 2020
  4. Study completion30 Dec 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
60 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03945734
Sponsor's protocol ID
19-0612
Status last verified
Mar 2021
First submitted
7 May 2019
Last updated
3 Dec 2025
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Expressive Helping in people with Neoplasms and Cancer, run by New York University at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Dec 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of participants screened (time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Dec 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in