AzTrials
AzTrials

Type1 Diabetes MellitusMERMAID-T1DNCT03945747

MEtabolic and Renal Effects of AutoMAted Insulin Delivery Systems in Youth With Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus

An observational study of Type1 Diabetes Mellitus and Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, run by University of Colorado, Denver at 1 site in United States.

Active, not recruiting

Under way, not looking for participants. Everyone needed has enrolled. The study is still running.

Official record

Search all trials

Trial summary

In type 1 diabetes (T1DM), automated insulin delivery (AID) systems such as the hybrid closed loop artificial pancreas (HCL AP) combine the use of an insulin pump, continuous blood sugar monitor, and control algorithm to adjust background insulin delivery to improve time in target blood sugar range. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 7 to 18 years
What is being tested?
Blood draw, Urine sample collection and DXA scan
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
How many people
50 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
14 Aug 2019to 1 Aug 2026
Phase
Observational

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 7 to 18 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult

Study population: Individuals aged 7-18 years with known type 1 diabetes mellitus who are either planning to continue with standard insulin pump or multiple daily insulin injection therapy OR planning to transition to an automated insulin delivery system such as the hybrid closed-loop artificial pancreas system or the predictive low glucose suspend system.

Who may be able to join

  • Age 7-18 years
  • Type 1 diabetes with at least two of the following criteria: diabetes-associated antibody-positivity, rapid conversion to insulin requirement after diagnosis, absent c-peptide, or DKA at diagnosis
  • Currently receiving insulin therapy by multiple daily injections or standard insulin pump therapy

Who cannot join

  • Non-type 1 diabetes mellitus
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding
  • Receiving treatment with non-insulin glucose-altering medications including oral anti-hyperglycemic medications, steroids, or antipsychotics
  • Following a ketogenic diet

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Children's Hospital Colorado

    Aurora, Colorado, 80045

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: MEtabolic and Renal Effects of AutoMAted Insulin Delivery Systems in Youth With Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (MERMAID-T1D)

In type 1 diabetes (T1DM), automated insulin delivery (AID) systems such as the hybrid closed loop artificial pancreas (HCL AP) combine the use of an insulin pump, continuous blood sugar monitor, and control algorithm to adjust background insulin delivery to improve time in target blood sugar range. Systems such as the predictive low glucose suspend system (PLGS) pause insulin delivery to try and reduce low blood sugars. We aim to complete a pilot study involving recruitment of youth ages 7 to 18 years from the following groups with type 1 diabetes: control participants consisting of youth on either multiple daily insulin injections or conventional insulin pump therapy that plan to continue with their current treatment modality, youth being transitioned to the HCL AP system, and youth being transitioned to the PLGS system. Individuals will be recruited into each of the aforementioned study groups based on their own expressed desire to either continue on MDI/standard insulin pump therapy or transition to either the HCL AP or PLGS systems. The decision to either continue with current therapy or transition therapy will remain entirely up to the participant and their family and will be based on personal preference and insurance coverage for that individual. We will not be randomizing the participants to any given treatment group during this study but rather will be recruiting based on the participant's decision. We would like to complete a physical exam with pubertal staging, collect blood and urine samples to evaluate cardiometabolic and renal markers, and complete a DXA scan to evaluate total lean and fat mass. After 3-6 months of either continuation of current treatment with either multiple daily insulin injections or conventional insulin pump therapy or transitioning to the HCL AP or PLGS systems, we would like to repeat the previously described blood, urine, and imaging tests for comparison. We are interested in examining the impact of the HCL AP and PLGS systems on maintaining blood sugars in target range, insulin sensitivity, and markers of cardiometabolic and renal function. We hypothesize that pauses in insulin delivery, as seen in the setting of automated insulin delivery systems, will result in improvements in insulin sensitivity, cardiometabolic markers, and renal function markers.

Read the detailed description

Background: Over 1.25 million Americans have type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), significantly increasing the risk of early death from cardio-renal disease. Per the American Diabetes Association, only 14% of children with T1DM meet glycemic targets [Wood et al. Diabetes Care 2013; 36:2035-37]. This is a severe and pervasive problem, as a child diagnosed with T1DM today is expected to live up to 17 years less than non-diabetic peers. It is established that time outside of goal glycemic target range increases the likelihood of developing micro- and macro-vascular diabetic complications including diabetic kidney disease (DKD) and cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, metabolic risk factors beyond glycemic control including insulin resistance and obesity are also increasingly recognized to contribute to the increased risk of DKD and CVD. Automated insulin delivery (AID) systems such as the hybrid closed loop artificial pancreas (HCL AP) combine use of an insulin pump, continuous glucose monitor (CGM), and a control algorithm to adjust background insulin delivery to improve time in target range. AID systems such as the predictive low glucose suspend (PLGS) system pause insulin delivery to try to reduce hypoglycemia. AID systems are now seeing markedly increased commercial use; however, the long-term effects on insulin sensitivity, body mass index (BMI), cardio-metabolic markers, and kidney function have not yet been studied. Preliminary basic science research suggests that periods of rest from insulin exposure provided by AID systems may have positive effects on DKD and CVD risk. In this proposal we intend to investigate the gap in knowledge between glycemic changes seen with AID systems and the impact on markers of long-term complications.

Specific Aims and Hypotheses:

Specific Aim 1: To examine the effects of the AID systems on glycemic control and insulin sensitivity as compared to traditional insulin pumps and multiple daily injections in youth with T1DM Hypothesis 1.1: Treatment with the AID systems improves glycemic control in youth with T1DM Hypothesis 1.2: Treatment with the AID systems increases insulin sensitivity and decreases insulin requirement in youth with T1DM

Specific Aim 2: To examine the effects of the AID systems on kidney function and metabolic markers as compared to traditional insulin pumps and multiple daily injections in youth with T1DM Hypothesis 2.1: Treatment with the AID systems improves metabolic markers in youth with T1DM Hypothesis 2.2: Treatment with the AID systems improves kidney function in youth with T1DM

Design: This study is a pilot study aimed at recruiting youth ages 7 to 18 years from the following 3 groups with T1DM: control participants on either multiple daily injections or conventional pump therapy, youth being transitioned to a HCL AP system, and youth being transitioned to a PLGS system. Exclusion criteria include non-T1DM, non-insulin blood glucose altering medications, pregnancy, breastfeeding, or a ketogenic diet. We plan to complete a physical exam with pubertal staging, collect information on recent insulin usage and dosages, fasting serum and urine samples, and a DXA scan before the participant transitions to either a HCL AP or a PLGS system, if applicable. Following 3-6 months of treatment we will then collect the identical data as at baseline. Outcome measures include CGM data, total daily insulin dose, time suspended from insulin delivery, height, weight, BMI, waist circumference, hip circumference, blood pressure, HbA1c, c-peptide, total cholesterol, HDL, LDL, triglycerides, adiponectin, and DXA scan to evaluate cardio-metabolic markers and calculate insulin sensitivity, as well as serum creatinine, cystatin c, copeptin, and urine microalbumin to evaluate kidney health and calculate GFR by Zappitelli and FAS equations.

Being tested
Blood draw, Urine sample collection, DXA scan
Keywords
Automated insulin delivery systems, Insulin sensitivity, Cardiometabolic function, Renal function
Medical subject headings
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Diabetes Complications, Diabetic Nephropathies, Metabolic Diseases, Insulin Resistance

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Blood drawDiagnostic test

    Participants will undergo a blood collection for hemoglobin A1c, adiponectin, total cholesterol, LDL, HDL, triglycerides, and c-peptide at baseline and follow up in 3-6 months.

  • Urine sample collectionDiagnostic test

    Participants will undergo urine sample collection for urine microalbumin and urine creatinine at baseline and follow up in 3-6 months.

  • DXA scanDiagnostic test

    Participants will undergo a DXA scan for lean and fat mass measurements at baseline and follow up in 3-6 months.

Study groups in NCT03945747
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Control groupIndividuals continue current treatment regimen with either standard insulin pump therapy or multiple daily insulin injections for the duration of the study.
Receives: Diagnostic Test: Blood draw; Diagnostic Test: Urine sample collection; Diagnostic Test: DXA scan
Hybrid closed-loop artificial pancreas system groupIndividuals transition from either standard insulin pump therapy or multiple daily injections to a hybrid closed-loop system at the beginning of the study after initial labs and imaging studies are completed.
Receives: Diagnostic Test: Blood draw; Diagnostic Test: Urine sample collection; Diagnostic Test: DXA scan
Predictive low glucose suspend system groupIndividuals transition from either standard insulin pump therapy or multiple daily injections to a predictive low glucose suspend system at the beginning of the study after initial labs and imaging studies are completed.
Receives: Diagnostic Test: Blood draw; Diagnostic Test: Urine sample collection; Diagnostic Test: DXA scan

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in estimated insulin sensitivity

    Estimated by calculating the eIS, Pittsburgh eGDR, and SEARCH IS equations

    Measured: 3-6 months

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR)

    Estimated by calculating the Zappitelli (CysCrEq) and eGFR-FAS (using serum creatinine) equations

    Measured: 3-6 months

  2. Change in body mass index (BMI)

    Measured by evaluations of height and weight

    Measured: 3-6 months

  3. Change in lipid profile

    Measured by fasting blood draw for total cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and triglycerides

    Measured: 3-6 months

  4. Change in c-peptide

    Measured by fasting blood draw for c-peptide level

    Measured: 3-6 months

  5. Change in DXA scan

    Evaluation of lean and fat mass by DXA scan

    Measured: 3-6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted10 May 2019
  2. Study start14 Aug 2019
  3. Primary completion1 Aug 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Aug 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
50 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03945747
Sponsor's protocol ID
18-1558
Other IDs
UL1TR002535, 5T32DK063687-15
Acronym
MERMAID-T1D
Status last verified
Mar 2025
First submitted
8 May 2019
Last updated
30 Mar 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in