AzTrials
AzTrials

LeukemiaPhase 2REGALIANCT03948529

RevErsing Poor GrAft Function With eLtrombopag After allogeneIc Hematopoietic Cell trAnsplantation

A Phase 2 study testing eltrombopag in people with Leukemia and Graft Failure, run by University Hospital, Lille at 1 site in France.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Poor graft function (PGF) after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) is a misunderstood complication associated with poor outcome and limited therapeutic options. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 6 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Leukemia, Graft Failure
What is being tested?
eltrombopag
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
9 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
5 Sep 2019to 21 Aug 2023
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 6 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Diagnosis of poor graft function defined as:
  • Patient ≥ day+60 after allo-HCT,
  • Persisting thrombocytopenia on two different samples over at least two weeks (platelet < 30G/L with transfusion requirement) +/- neutropenia (ANC <1G/L) +/- anemia (Hb <8g/dL or transfusion requirement),
  • Full donor chimerism on whole blood (≥ 95%),
  • Biopsy proven hypocellular marrow without evidence of myelodysplasia
  • No evidence for relapse,
Show all 17Show fewer
  • No evidence for active acute or chronic graft versus host disease,
  • Absence of active viral infection (EBV, CMV, ADENOVIRUS, PARVOVIRUS B19),
  • Absence of B9/B12 deficiency,
  • Absence of hypothyroidism,
  • Absence of hypogonadism,
  • Absence of dialysis,
  • Absence of thrombotic microangiopathy,
  • Absence of macrophage activation syndrome,
  • No other known causes of poor graft function.
  • Written informed consent must be obtained before any study-trial specific procedure are performed,
  • Affiliation to a social security system.

Who cannot join

  • Criteria for poor graft function not fulfilled (see above),
  • Patients aged less than 6 years old (or unable to swallow),
  • Hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh ≥ 5),
  • Patients with bone morrow fibrosis,
  • Patients with a cytogenetic abnormality of chromosome 7
  • Hypersensitivity to eltrombopag or to any of the excipients,
Show all 13Show fewer
  • Patients with any contra-indication to eltrombopag, filgrastim,
  • Unable to understand the investigational nature of the study or give informed consent,
  • History of congestive heart failure, arrhythmia requiring chronic treatment, arterial or venous,
  • Thrombosis (not excluding line thrombosis) within the last 1 year, or myocardial infarction within 3 months before enrollment,
  • ECOG Performance Status of 3 or greater,
  • Pregnant and/or lactating women,
  • Freedom privacy.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

France1 site
  • Hôpital Claude Huriez, CHU

    Lille

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: RevErsing Poor GrAft Function With eLtrombopag After allogeneIc Hematopoietic Cell trAnsplantation: a Prospective, Phase II Study by the SFGM-TC

Poor graft function (PGF) after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) is a misunderstood complication associated with poor outcome and limited therapeutic options. Despite the lack of standardized diagnostic criteria, PGF is commonly defined as follows: one or several significant cytopenias after allo-HCT persisting or developing after allo-HCT despite full donor chimerism and in the absence of relapse or other causes. Not only PGF can alter patients' quality of life by leading to recurrent transfusions, bleeding events and infections, but it is also associated with poor survival after allo-HCT.

Although PGF is relatively frequent, there is no well-codified behavior in the literature or in the recommendations issued by the various learned societies of transplantation.

The aim objective of the investigator's study is to demonstrate that eltrombopag improve PGF after allo-HCT

Being tested
eltrombopag
Keywords
Poor Graft Function (PGF),, Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (Allo-HCT), Eltrombopag.
Medical subject headings
Leukemia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • eltrombopagDrug

    eltrombopag at the starting dose of 50mg/day. After 2 weeks of eltrombopag initiation and in the absence of platelet response, eltrombopag will be increased every two weeks (50mg increase) up to a maximum dose of 150mg/day (2 maximum escalation from D1, with maximum dose escalation phase of 4 weeks).

Study groups in NCT03948529
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
eltrombopagExperimentalEligible patients will receive the investigational drug eltrombopag
Receives: Drug: eltrombopag

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Platelet response

    Platelet response defined as a platelet count ≥ 30G/L at 12 weeks measured on at least two serial measurements performed 1 week apart and sustained for 1 month or more without support of platelet transfusions.

    Measured: at 12 weeks

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. Time to erythroid response

    Time to erythroid response defined as an increase of at least 1.5g/dL without transfusion, that is sustained for at least 2 weeks and transfusion requirements at 12 and 24 weeks for BRC as compared with transfusion requirements during the eight weeks preceding study entry

    Measured: at 12 and 24 weeks

  2. Time to neutrophil response

    Time to neutrophil response defined as an increase of ANC above 1G/L, which is sustained for at least 7 days,

    Measured: at least 7 days

  3. Percentage of patients presenting best bone marrow response at 12 and 24 weeks of treatment assessed by bone marrow aspirate and bone marrow biopsy with fibrosis staining.

    Measured: at 12 and 24 weeks

  4. Transfusion requirements

    Transfusion requirements for BRC and platelets as compared with transfusions requirements during the eight weeks preceding study entry

    Measured: at 12 and 24 weeks

  5. Proportion of patients presenting grade 3 or 4 adverse events from the first to the last administration of eltombopag.

    All adverse events will be reported on the adverse events reporting form of the case report file. Each adverse event will be recorded individually.

    The severity of the adverse event will be determined as follows :

    • Severe (grade 3): significant interference with the patient's daily activity and unacceptable,
    • Life-threatening (grade 4).

    Measured: from 1st administration of eltrombopag to 1 month after the last administration of eltrombopag,

  6. Quality of life evaluation using the European Organisation for Research Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire).

    The QLQ-C30 consists of thirty items:

    • 05 functional scales to explore the physical (1 to 5), executive (6 to 7), social (26 and 27), cognitive (20 and 25), and emotional (21 to 24) dimensions of the quality of life.
    • 09 symptomatic scales to explore fatigue (10, 12 and 18), nausea symptoms (14 and 15), pain (9 and 19), dyspnea (8), insomnia (11), anorexia (13), diarrhea (17), constipation (16) and financial difficulties (28).
    • 01 scale measuring the overall quality of life of each patient (29 and 30). The results of these different scales allow the calculation of a score that varies from 0 (worst) to 100 (better). A high overall health score reflects good health and a good quality of life. A high score for a symptom scale reflects a high level of symptoms. An average difference of 5 to 10 scores between two visits indicates a minor change, from 10 to 20 a moderate change and a difference of more than 20 points a significant change.

    Measured: at 12 and 24 weeks

  7. Immune function (T/B/NK cells counts)

    Measured: at 12 and 24 weeks

  8. Overall survival, relapse-free survival and non-relapse mortality

    No relapse disease will be investigated using the Fine-Gray Test. No relapse mortality represent all death without relapse of the underlind disease.

    Measured: at 24 weeks of treatment

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted14 May 2019
  2. Study start5 Sep 2019
  3. Primary completion24 Feb 2023
  4. Study completion21 Aug 2023

Why it stopped: inclusions difficulties.

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
9 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03948529
Sponsor's protocol ID
2017_52
Other IDs
2018-001157-27, 2018
Acronym
REGALIA
Status last verified
Sep 2025
First submitted
28 Feb 2019
Last updated
30 Sep 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing eltrombopag in people with Leukemia and Graft Failure, run by University Hospital, Lille at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 17 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Sep 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study was stopped early (reason given: inclusions difficulties.). Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Platelet response (time frame: at 12 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Sep 2025.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in