AzTrials
AzTrials

Gastric Residual VolumeNCT03948594

The Effect of Carbohydrate Loading on Gastric Residual Volume and Hunger Score

A study testing resource and plain water in people with Gastric Residual Volume, run by Universiti Sains Malaysia.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study conducted is to assess effect of carbohydrate loading (maltodextrin with whey protein) to gastric volume 2 hours after ingestion via aspiration while doing OGDS (direct visualisation) and patient's wellbeing (hunger, thirst, weakness, tiredness, anxiety) for all patient planned for OGDS. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 100 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Gastric Residual Volume
What is being tested?
resource and plain water
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
78 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
May 2019to Dec 2019
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 100 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patient more than 18 years old

Who cannot join

  • History of upper gastrointestinal surgery
  • Intestinal obstruction
  • Patient with vomiting
  • Mentally disable or who cannot give an informed consent

Trial locations and contacts

No sites are listed yet.

Bee Chen Lua, M.D. contact

+60127107200

beechen0806@outlook.com

Pak Kai Wong, M.Med Surgery contact

+60143339628

michaelpkwong@usm.my

About this study

Official title: The Effect of Carbohydrate Loading on Gastric Residual Volume and Hunger Score: A Single Blind, Randomised Controlled Trial Study

This study conducted is to assess effect of carbohydrate loading (maltodextrin with whey protein) to gastric volume 2 hours after ingestion via aspiration while doing OGDS (direct visualisation) and patient's wellbeing (hunger, thirst, weakness, tiredness, anxiety) for all patient planned for OGDS.

hypothesis H1: There is significant association between carbohydrate loading with residual gastric volume and subject's wellbeing H0: there is no significant association between carbohydrate loading with gastric residual volume and subject's wellbeing

Read the detailed description

Patient scheduled for elective OGDS in HUSM from April 2019 to December 2019 with the complaint of one or more of the following symptoms: Bothersome postprandial fullness, early satiation, Epigastric pain or Epigastric burning are eligible to participate in the study. Patients who fulfilled exclusion criteria (History of upper gastrointestinal surgery, intestinal obstruction, patient with vomiting or mentally disable or who cannot give an informed consent) are ineligible.

If a patient fulfils the inclusion criteria, a suitable medical officer will discuss the trial with patient while reviewing patient in surgical outpatient clinic prior to OGDS. Patient will be approached again on the day of OGDS, if patient agree to participate in study, a written consent will be obtained. If patient refuse to participate in study, appropriate treatment and care still will be provided to patient. The consent form will provide information about the purpose of the study, the procedures to be followed, risks and benefits of participation. If patient agree to participate in the trial, subject will be enrolled in the study. Method of recruitment in this study is direct recruitment of potential study participants.

Stratified permuted block randomization was used. Randomization sequence was created using https://www.sealedenvelope.com/simple-randomiser/v1/lists and is stratified by gender (female and male) with 1:1 allocation. Random block sizes of 6 is used.

Allocation sequence is according computer generated random number list, it was prepared by an investigator with no clinical involvement in the trial. Allocation sequence was concealed from researcher enrolling and assessing participants. Allocation sequence will be sealed in sequentially numbered and opaque envelopes. A manila card will be placed inside envelop to render it impermeable to intense light. To prevent subversion of the allocation sequence, the name and I/C of the participant will be written on a book together with the series number on envelopes. The details in the book will be kept confidentially. After enrolled subject complete all baseline assessment, corresponding envelope will be enclosed by staff (who not involve in study) who prepare the drink. The staff need to ensure that the envelop still sealed when receive it. The staff will prepare the drink into identical container according to the assignment

Subjects are randomised into 2 group: group A with 250cc plain water and group B give 1 packet resource(237ml). Subjects need to finish the drink over 10minutes. After that, subjects are not allow to leave endoscope room before OGDS done to prevent consumption of other drink or food.

2 hours after that, subject undergo OGDS. OGDS is done follow standard protocol.

  1. Patient lies in left lateral position
  2. Medication to numb the back of throats (spray) will be given to prevent gagging during the passage of the instrument
  3. A plastic mouth guard is placed between the teeth to prevent damage to the teeth and endoscope.
  4. The endoscope (also called a gastroscope) will be inserted through the mouthpiece
  5. A small container or yankauer suction is placed close to the mouth of a patient to collect saliva during and after the esophagogastroduodenoscopy
  6. Endoscope will be inserted along the middle line of the soft palate.
  7. Once endoscope advanced, patient may be asked to swallow to facilitate advancement of scope.
  8. Throughout the procedure, no water flushing is allowed, only air inflation is allowed
  9. visualised pooling of fluid in the stomach is aspirated until dry via direct visualization with endoscope. Aspirated fluid will be collected in suction reservoir and the fluid will be measured.

Subject's wellbeing is assessed via visual analogue scale (VAS) which consist of 5 parameters: hunger, thirst, anxiety, tiredness and weakness. Each scale consisted of ungraded, horizontal lines anchored at two ends. The left end of the scale represented "not at all" which score: 0 and the right end represented and "the most imaginable" which score: 100. Trained staff nurse will ask patient regarding level of 5 parameters and subject need to mark X somewhere along the horizontal line given before drink and before OGDS procedure.

All subjects are advised to inform assessor if there is adverse reaction. Medical personnel are available to manage any adverse events that might occur throughout the procedure.

The possible risk that may arise in the study include injury to the gastrointestinal's wall, aspiration and bleeding which is the similar risk for all patient going through OGDS procedure. Small volume of the drink will not cause psychological distress to subject, but its taste may not be palatable.

Sample size is calculated for all the objectives. However, the one that yield the biggest number is taken as the sample size.

objective 1 is to identify the gastric residual volume between subject with plain water (group A) and carbohydrate loading (group B). Sample size was calculated using comparing two means formula.

Objective 2 is to determined patient's well being for group A and group B. sample size was calculate using comparing paired difference formula.

For all sample size calculation, type I error was set at 5% (two tailed), Type 2 error was 20% (to achieve 80% power of study).

Corrected sample size is calculated after included 10% of dropout rate. Corrected sample size = calculated sample size/ (1-anticipated drop out rate).

After considering both objective, 1st objective give biggest number of sample size. Hence, 35 subject per group with a total number of 70 subjects are needed to study both objectives. after consider dropout rate, minimum sample size in this study is 39 subjects per group with a total number of 78 subjects.

The collected data will be entry and analyzed using SPSS version 24 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA)

Objective 1 is to determine and compare gastric residual volume between group A and group B subjects. Independent T test is used to interpret the date.

Objective 2 is to determine and compare subject's well being before and after drink in between group A and group B. paired t test is used to determine effect of drink on subject's wellbeing before and after in each group. ANOVA is used to compare effect of the drink in both groups.

Being tested
resource, plain water
Keywords
resource, gastric residual volume, hunger score

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • resourceDietary supplement

    1 packet resource(237ml), 1.05kcal/ml, 53.6g carbohydrate and 9g protein

  • plain waterOther

    250ml plain water

Study groups in NCT03948594
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
plain waterPlacebo comparatorsubject drink 250cc plain water
Receives: Other: plain water
resourceActive comparatorsubject drink 1 packet resource(237ml)
Receives: Dietary Supplement: resource

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. gastric residual volume

    Amount of gastric residual volume (ml) that has been aspirated via OGDS 2 hours after plain water or carbohydrate loading group

    Measured: 2 hours after plain water or carbohydrate loading

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. patient's wellbeing

    Subject's wellbeing is assessed via visual analogue scale (VAS) which consist of 5 parameters: hunger, thirst, anxiety, tiredness and weakness. Each scale consisted of ungraded, horizontal lines (with length of 100mm) anchored at two ends. The left end of the scale represented "not at all" which score: 0 and the right end represented and "the most imaginable" which score: 100. Subject need to mark X somewhere along the horizontal line given before drink and before OGDS procedure. Score of each parameter will be reported as mm.

    Measured: baseline (before drink) and 120minutes after drinking

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted14 May 2019
  2. Study startMay 2019 (estimated)
  3. Primary completionDec 2019 (estimated)
  4. Study completionDec 2019 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Subjects are randomised into 2 group: group A with 250cc plain water and group B with 1 packet resource(237ml)
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Care provider, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
78 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03948594
Sponsor's protocol ID
USM/JEPeM/19010082
Status last verified
May 2019
First submitted
30 Apr 2019
Last updated
17 May 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Adamina M, Kehlet H, Tomlinson GA, Senagore AJ, Delaney CP. Enhanced recovery pathways optimize health outcomes and resource utilization: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in colorectal surgery. Surgery. 2011 Jun;149(6):830-40. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2010.11.003. Epub 2011 Jan 14.

    PubMed 21236454
  • Asai T. Editorial II: Who is at increased risk of pulmonary aspiration? Br J Anaesth. 2004 Oct;93(4):497-500. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeh234. No abstract available.

    PubMed 15361474
  • Carmichael JC, Keller DS, Baldini G, Bordeianou L, Weiss E, Lee L, Boutros M, McClane J, Steele SR, Feldman LS. Clinical practice guideline for enhanced recovery after colon and rectal surgery from the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS) and Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES). Surg Endosc. 2017 Sep;31(9):3412-3436. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5722-7. Epub 2017 Aug 3. No abstract available.

    PubMed 28776285
  • Dalal KS, Rajwade D, Suchak R. "Nil per oral after midnight": Is it necessary for clear fluids? Indian J Anaesth. 2010 Sep;54(5):445-7. doi: 10.4103/0019-5049.71044.

    PubMed 21189883
  • Faria MS, de Aguilar-Nascimento JE, Pimenta OS, Alvarenga LC Jr, Dock-Nascimento DB, Slhessarenko N. Preoperative fasting of 2 hours minimizes insulin resistance and organic response to trauma after video-cholecystectomy: a randomized, controlled, clinical trial. World J Surg. 2009 Jun;33(6):1158-64. doi: 10.1007/s00268-009-0010-x.

    PubMed 19363695
  • Gustafsson UO, Nygren J, Thorell A, Soop M, Hellstrom PM, Ljungqvist O, Hagstrom-Toft E. Pre-operative carbohydrate loading may be used in type 2 diabetes patients. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2008 Aug;52(7):946-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2008.01599.x. Epub 2008 Mar 7.

    PubMed 18331374
  • Hausel J, Nygren J, Lagerkranser M, Hellstrom PM, Hammarqvist F, Almstrom C, Lindh A, Thorell A, Ljungqvist O. A carbohydrate-rich drink reduces preoperative discomfort in elective surgery patients. Anesth Analg. 2001 Nov;93(5):1344-50. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200111000-00063.

    PubMed 11682427
  • Helminen H, Viitanen H, Sajanti J. Effect of preoperative intravenous carbohydrate loading on preoperative discomfort in elective surgery patients. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2009 Feb;26(2):123-7. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e328319be16.

    PubMed 19142085
  • Hofman DL, van Buul VJ, Brouns FJ. Nutrition, Health, and Regulatory Aspects of Digestible Maltodextrins. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2016 Sep 9;56(12):2091-100. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2014.940415.

    PubMed 25674937
  • Kaska M, Grosmanova T, Havel E, Hyspler R, Petrova Z, Brtko M, Bares P, Bares D, Schusterova B, Pyszkova L, Tosnerova V, Sluka M. The impact and safety of preoperative oral or intravenous carbohydrate administration versus fasting in colorectal surgery--a randomized controlled trial. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2010 Jan;122(1-2):23-30. doi: 10.1007/s00508-009-1291-7.

    PubMed 20177856
  • Kratzing C. Pre-operative nutrition and carbohydrate loading. Proc Nutr Soc. 2011 Aug;70(3):311-5. doi: 10.1017/S0029665111000450.

    PubMed 21781358
  • Nason KS. Acute Intraoperative Pulmonary Aspiration. Thorac Surg Clin. 2015 Aug;25(3):301-7. doi: 10.1016/j.thorsurg.2015.04.011.

    PubMed 26210926
  • Noblett SE, Watson DS, Huong H, Davison B, Hainsworth PJ, Horgan AF. Pre-operative oral carbohydrate loading in colorectal surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Colorectal Dis. 2006 Sep;8(7):563-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2006.00965.x.

    PubMed 16919107
  • Nygren J, Thorell A, Jacobsson H, Larsson S, Schnell PO, Hylen L, Ljungqvist O. Preoperative gastric emptying. Effects of anxiety and oral carbohydrate administration. Ann Surg. 1995 Dec;222(6):728-34. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199512000-00006.

    PubMed 8526579
  • Tran S, Wolever TM, Errett LE, Ahn H, Mazer CD, Keith M. Preoperative carbohydrate loading in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass or spinal surgery. Anesth Analg. 2013 Aug;117(2):305-13. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e318295e8d1. Epub 2013 Jun 11.

    PubMed 23757474

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing resource and plain water in people with Gastric Residual Volume, run by Universiti Sains Malaysia.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 May 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Bee Chen Lua, M.D. (+60127107200, beechen0806@outlook.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

gastric residual volume (time frame: 2 hours after plain water or carbohydrate loading). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03948594, which also lists 16 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 May 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in