AzTrials
AzTrials

Obesity, MorbidPROP OPENNCT03951064

Providing Optimal PEEP During Mechanical Ventilation for Obese Patients Using Esophageal Balloon

A study testing Esophageal balloon, Intervention Spontaneous Breathing Trial (SBT) and Extubation and Intervention Weaning after Tracheostomy in people with Obesity, Morbid and Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury, run by University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill at 2 sites in United States.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a research study to determine if identifying an optimal level of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) targeted specifically to individualized patient characteristics will shorten the time on the ventilator. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Esophageal balloon, Intervention Spontaneous Breathing Trial (SBT) and Extubation and Intervention Weaning after Tracheostomy
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
6 participants
Where
2 sitesUnited States
Study dates
31 Mar 2021to 6 Dec 2022
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Body mass index greater than or equal to 40
  • Acute respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation

Who cannot join

  • Refusal to give consent by the subject or their legally authorized representative
  • Abdominal compartment syndrome
  • Chest tube for pneumothorax
  • Having been on a ventilator for >4 days
  • Suspicion of or known intracranial hypertension
  • Anticipated extubation within 24 hours
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Chronic ventilator dependence
  • Condition that precludes placement of an esophageal balloon (esophageal or nasopharyngeal pathology preventing insertion of the esophageal balloon catheter, severe thrombocytopenia or coagulopathy)
  • Incarceration

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

United States2 sites
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

    Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599

  • East Carolina University

    Greenville, North Carolina, 27834

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Effect of Esophageal Pressure Measurement to Determine Optimal Positive End-expiratory Pressure Compared to Usual Care in Obese Patients Receiving Mechanical Ventilation

This is a research study to determine if identifying an optimal level of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) targeted specifically to individualized patient characteristics will shorten the time on the ventilator.

Participants will have catheter placed through the nose into the esophagus to measure the pressure inside the chest. This catheter will remain until the patient is freed from the ventilator. Participants will be randomized to usual care or to have the level of PEEP determined by the esophageal balloon pressure readings. The total time spent on the ventilator will be recorded.

Read the detailed description

Study Design:

Randomized-controlled clinical trial. Patients will be enrolled within 4 days of mechanical ventilation and randomized 1:1 to titration of PEEP based on esophageal balloon pressures or based on the "High PEEP" ARDSnet PEEP/fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) table. All patients will have esophageal balloons placed with baseline measurement of Ptp. Patients randomized to the intervention arm will then undergo titration of PEEP based on Ptp measurements to achieve "Optimal PEEP," defined as end expiratory Ptp of 0 to +2 cm water (H2O).

Being tested
Esophageal balloon, Intervention Spontaneous Breathing Trial (SBT) and Extubation, Control Spontaneous Breathing Trial and Extubation, Intervention Weaning after Tracheostomy, Control Weaning after Tracheostomy
Keywords
Transpulmonary pressure, Esophageal balloon, Esophageal pressure monitoring, Mechanical ventilation
Medical subject headings
Obesity, Morbid, Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury, Respiratory Insufficiency

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Esophageal balloonDevice

    All patients in both groups will have an esophageal balloon catheter inserted by a research investigator. The catheter will be inserted into their nare while upright (head of bed >30 degrees) to a depth slightly more than the estimated distance from the lower sternum to the back of the ear (typically around 60 cm). Gastric positioning will be confirmed with abdominal compression testing and the catheter then retracted 10 - 20cm into the lower esophagus. Placement will be confirmed with the presence of cardiac oscillations on the esophageal probe. The probe will then be secured to the patient's nasal opening using tape.

  • Intervention Spontaneous Breathing Trial (SBT) and ExtubationProcedure or surgery

    Patients in the Intervention group will undergo an SBT regardless of their PEEP level. The PEEP that generates a Ptp of 0 will be considered their optimal PEEP, and this will not be lowered for the SBT. The Intervention Group SBT will consist of a trial of a pressure support of 5 cm H2O and Optimal PEEP.

  • Control Spontaneous Breathing Trial and ExtubationProcedure or surgery

    Patients in the Control group will undergo an SBT when they reach a PEEP ≤8 cm H2O. This is the current standard of care based on the SBT protocol at UNC Hospitals. SBT and extubation prior to meeting these criteria will be based on primary medical team's discretion and will be recorded for analysis and safety tracking.

  • Intervention Weaning after TracheostomyProcedure or surgery

    Based on the use of optimal PEEP in this group, and the experience in the previous study protocol, the investigators will place patients in the Intervention group on Tracheostomy Collar Trial only with a speaking valve. This simulates the normal process of utilizing the upper airway to maintain lung inflation that is performed automatically when a patient does not have an artificial airway.

  • Control Weaning after TracheostomyProcedure or surgery

    The control group will be placed on Tracheostomy Collar Trial with no requirement for speaking valve. They may utilize a speaking valve if tolerated and desired, but there is no requirement as there is in the Intervention group.

Study groups in NCT03951064
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Optimal PEEPExperimentalThe waveforms of airway pressure (Paw), esophageal pressure (Pes), and transpulmonary pressure (Ptp) will be visualized on the ventilator. Ptp is obtained from Paw - Pes. PEEP will be increased on the ventilator to achieve a Ptp between 0 and +2 cm H2O (Optimal PEEP). Measurements will be obtained daily and adjustments to PEEP will occur daily. PEEP will be reduced below Optimal PEEP in the setting of hemodynamic compromise (requiring increasing vasoactive medications for blood pressure support).
Receives: Device: Esophageal balloon; Procedure: Intervention Spontaneous Breathing Trial (SBT) and Extubation; Procedure: Intervention Weaning after Tracheostomy
Acute Hypoxic Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network (ARDSNet) High PEEPActive comparatorPEEP in the control group will be determined by High PEEP ARDSnet PEEP/FiO2 table. Titration of PEEP will occur when clinically indicated by partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2) or oxygen saturation (SpO2), and FiO2. The investigators chose the High PEEP table based on the clinical suspicion that obese patients may require higher PEEP levels on average than non-obese patients to balance the additional pressure of their chest wall. In addition, EPVent2, a study of esophageal balloon PEEP titration in patients with ARDS utilized the High PEEP table. Patients with moderate and severe ARDS benefit from higher levels of PEEP.
Receives: Device: Esophageal balloon; Procedure: Control Spontaneous Breathing Trial and Extubation; Procedure: Control Weaning after Tracheostomy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of Ventilator-Free Days (VFD) by Day 28

    The number of days a patient is alive and free from the ventilator up to day 28.

    Measured: 28 days

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. Number of Participants Reintubated

    Intubated within 72 hours of extubation

    Measured: 72 hours after extubation

  2. ICU Length of Stay

    Number of days spent in the ICU

    Measured: maximum duration of ICU stay, up to 46 days

  3. Hospital Length of Stay

    Number of days spent in the Hospital

    Measured: maximum duration of hospital stay, up to 83 days

  4. Number of Patients Receiving a Tracheostomy

    Whether the patient required a tracheostomy to be liberated from the ventilator

    Measured: during mechanical ventilation, up to 28 days

  5. Number of Patients Extubated Early

    Extubation prior to meeting established criteria (Control group only). Participants in the Control group will undergo an SBT when they reach a PEEP ≤8 cm H2O. This is the current standard of care based on the SBT protocol at UNC Hospitals. SBT and extubation prior to meeting these criteria will be based on primary medical team's discretion and will be recorded for analysis and safety tracking.

    Measured: 28 days

  6. Highest Richmond Agitation and Sedation Scale

    Measures the mental and physical state of a sedated patient. Range from -5 to +4. A score of 0 indicates a calm arousable patient and is the ideal score. A score of +4 indicates a very combative participant and a score of -5 indicates an unarousable participant. This outcome captures the highest score measured throughout mechanical ventilation with scores on the extreme ends of the range reflecting a worse outcome.

    Measured: during mechanical ventilation, up to 28 days

  7. Lowest Richmond Agitation and Sedation Scale

    Measures the mental and physical state of a sedated patient. Range from -5 to +4. A score of 0 indicates a calm arousable patient and is the ideal score. A score of +4 indicates a very combative participant and a score of -5 indicates an unarousable participant. This outcome captures the lowest score measured throughout mechanical ventilation with scores on the extreme ends of the range reflecting a worse outcome.

    Measured: during mechanical ventilation, up to 28 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted15 May 2019
  2. Study start31 Mar 2021
  3. Primary completion6 Dec 2022
  4. Study completion6 Dec 2022

Why it stopped: Since November 2022, an indefinite pause of study activities caused by a hospital-wide shortage of esophageal balloons has persisted for almost a full year with an indefinite resupply date. Thus, the PI has opted to close to any further enrollment.

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
6 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03951064
Sponsor's protocol ID
18-2010
Acronym
PROP OPEN
Status last verified
Mar 2024
First submitted
13 May 2019
Last updated
5 Jun 2024
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
Yes: A deidentified dataset will be available to investigators 9-36 months following publication of the study.

Publications

  • Obi ON, Mazer M, Bangley C, Kassabo Z, Saadah K, Trainor W, Stephens K, Rice PL, Shaw R. Obesity and Weaning from Mechanical Ventilation-An Exploratory Study. Clin Med Insights Circ Respir Pulm Med. 2018 Sep 18;12:1179548418801004. doi: 10.1177/1179548418801004. eCollection 2018.

    PubMed 30245572
  • Beitler JR, Sarge T, Banner-Goodspeed VM, Gong MN, Cook D, Novack V, Loring SH, Talmor D; EPVent-2 Study Group. Effect of Titrating Positive End-Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) With an Esophageal Pressure-Guided Strategy vs an Empirical High PEEP-Fio2 Strategy on Death and Days Free From Mechanical Ventilation Among Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2019 Mar 5;321(9):846-857. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.0555.

    PubMed 30776290

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Esophageal balloon, Intervention Spontaneous Breathing Trial (SBT) and Extubation and Intervention Weaning after Tracheostomy in people with Obesity, Morbid and Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury, run by University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill at 2 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Jun 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 5 Jun 2024). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of Ventilator-Free Days (VFD) by Day 28 (time frame: 28 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03951064, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Jun 2024.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in