CTEPHNCT03953560
Symptom-related Screening for Early Detection of CTEPH.
A study testing dyspnea grade ≥ II according NYHA-WHO in people with CTEPH and Pulmonary Embolism, run by Luis Jara-Palomares, MD at 16 sites in Spain.
Trial summary
Routine screening for Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) i after PE is not supported by current evidence and guidelines. This study aims to evaluate if a screening program for patients with acute PE based on telephone monitoring of symptoms and further examination if only symptomatic patients could… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- CTEPH, Pulmonary Embolism, Symptoms and Signs
- What is being tested?
- dyspnea grade ≥ II according NYHA-WHO
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 646 participants
- Where
- 16 sitesSpain
- Study dates
- 16 Jan 2019to 15 Feb 2022
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age > 18 year
- Objectively confirmed diagnosis of acute PE by multidetector CT, V/Q lung scan, or selective pulmonary angiography, according to established diagnostic criteria, with or without symptomatic DVT,
- Ability of subject to understand the character and consequences of the study,
- informed consent of the subject.
Who cannot join
- refused informed consent, inability to cooperation.
Trial locations and contacts
16 sites in 1 country.
16 sites in 1 country
Spain16 sites
Hospital General Universitario de Albacete
Albacete
Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge
Barcelona
Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Deu
Barcelona
Consorcio Hospitalario Provincial de Castellón
Castellon, Castellon
Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía
Córdoba
Hospital Virgen de la Luz
Cuenca
Hospital General Universitario de Elche
Elche
Hospital de Galdakao
Galdakao, Vizcaya
Hospital Universitari de Girona Dr. Josep Trueta
Girona
Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova
Lleida
Hospital Clínico San Carlos
Madrid
Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre
Madrid
Hospital Universitario Puerto Real
Puerto Real, Cadiz
Hospital Virgen del Rocio
Seville, 41014
Hospital Universitario Joan XXIII de Tarragona
Tarragona
Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa
Zaragoza
About this study
Official title: Symptom-related Screening Program Following Pulmonary Embolism for Early Detection of Chronic ThromboEmbolic Pulmonary Hypertension (CTEPH)
Routine screening for Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) i after PE is not supported by current evidence and guidelines.
This study aims to evaluate if a screening program for patients with acute PE based on telephone monitoring of symptoms and further examination if only symptomatic patients could help an early detection of CTEPH.
Read the detailed description
Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is a long-term complication following an acute or silent pulmonary embolism (PE). A history of acute PE was reported in 75% of CTEPH patients. Nevertheless, incidence of CTEPH after a confirmed acute PE vary widely depending of the studies, with estimated incidence from 0.5 to 4%. Performing a follow-up examination of patients diagnosed with acute PE regardless of persisting symptoms and using all available technical procedures is not cost-effective. As a consequence, routine screening for CTEPH after PE is not supported by current evidence and guidelines.
CTEPH is a very disabling and mortal disease, although it is a potential curable disease. However, delayed diagnosis and misdiagnosis is common. Patients are frequently diagnosed with CTEPH at advanced stages of the disease leading to worse clinical outcomes. Early diagnosis of CTEPH is essential, as delay in diagnosis may be associated with a worse prognosis, higher perioperative mortality and inoperable diseases stages. Overall, evidence from various sources suggests that early detection and treatment of CTEPH is advantageous in achieving favorable clinical outcomes. Therefore, there is an important unmet need for early diagnosing this disease.
Focusing diagnostic procedures only on symptomatic patients may be a practical approach for detecting relevant CTEPH.
This study aims to evaluate if a screening program for patients with acute PE based on telephone monitoring of symptoms and further examination if only symptomatic patients could help an early detection of CTEPH.
Objectives
- Primary outcome: To estimate the impact of an easy and simple strategy to identify CTEPH.
- Secondary outcomes:
- To identify patients with CTED after PE
- To obtain external validation from scores to identify patients at risk to develop CTEPH
- To develop new score to identify high risk population to develop CTEPH
Hypothesis Conceptual hypothesis: The use of a strategy to detect CTEPH will increase number of patients diagnosed of pulmonary hypertension.
Operational hypothesis: The use of a strategy to detect CTEPH will increase in a 200% the number of patients diagnosed with CTEPH.
Design Cohorts study in consecutive patients with objectively confirmed PE.
Specialists implied Internal medicine, Pulmonologist, Hematologist from 20 hospitals.
Inclusion criteria: 1) Age > 18 year 2) Objectively confirmed diagnosis of acute PE by multidetector CT, V/Q lung scan, or selective pulmonary angiography, according to established diagnostic criteria, with or without symptomatic DVT, 3) Ability of subject to understand the character and consequences of the study, 4) informed consent of the subject. Exclusion criteria: refused informed consent, inability to cooperation.
Intervention Investigator from each center will recover consecutive PE patients and collect baseline, demographic and co-morbidities.
In all patients enrolled in the study a short questionnaire regarding dyspnea symptoms will be performed. All patients that refer dyspnea grade ≥ II according NYHA-WHO modified scale will be cited as outpatient to be evaluated
A written informed consent will be required all patients evaluated in consultant.
Imaging studies and right heart catheterization is the procedure agreeing with the standard care according to current ESC/ERS Guidelines.
In all patients, the following tests will be performed:
- Pulsioximetry.
- Electrocardiogram.
- Blood sample with determination of NT-ProBNP.
- Echocardiography. Only an echocardiography indicative of PH warrants further evaluation
- V/Q scintigraphy. Possible CTEPH can be assumed when mismatched perfusion defects are detected by VQ scan.
- Right heart catheterization \& Pulmonary CT Scan are required for confirming the diagnosis
The relationship of Doppler echocardiography-estimated PASP with right heart catheterization (RHC)-measured PASP was examined using Spearman's correlation coefficients. The Bland-Altman method was then used to assess the agreement between Doppler echocardiography-estimated and RHC measured PASP. Doppler echocardiography-estimated PASP within +/- 10mmHg of the value measured on RHC was considered accurate, consistent with the cutoffs used in other publications.
Secondary outcome include number of patients with chronic thromboembolic disease (CTED), described as chronic thromboembolic pulmonary vascular obstruction with normal resting pulmonary artery pressures.
Treatment: No treatment required
Statistical Plans Sample size calculation We estimate CTEPH prevalence in reference group of 1%, and a prevalence of CTEPH in interventional group of 2.8%. With unilateral test, con confidence level of 95%, statistic power of 80% and losses expected of 25%, we calculated a final sample size of 947.
The investigators calculate that 16-20 centers in Spain are needed to recruit patients
Investigators will compare baseline characteristics of patients with and without CTEPH using chi-square tests for categorical variables and non-parametric rank tests for continuous variables. Cumulative incidence of CTEPH will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier technique.
To do external validation of previous score to predict CTEPH discriminative power by calculating the area under the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve will be done, performing a non-parametric test of the equality of the areas under the ROC curves. Goodness-of-fit of the score points for each score in a logistic regression model using Pearson's chi-square test.
Student's t test and X2 test (or Fisher's exact test where appropriate) will be used to compare continuous or categorical variables, and multivariable analysis through a logistic regression model using the Wald method (step back) to identify independent predictors for the occurrence of CTEPH. Covariates entering in the model will be selected by a significance level of p <0.20 on univariable analysis, or by a well-known association reported in the literature. Then, the investigators will build a prognostic score assigning points to each independent variable according to regression coefficients β, rounding to the nearest integer. The investigators will assign a risk score to each patient by adding up points for each independent variable. Performance will be quantified in terms of calibration using the Hosmer-Lemeshow test. Model discrimination will be assessed using the C-statistic. Internal validity of the score will be confirmed using bootstrap analysis. For the statistical analysis the investigators will use the IBM SPSS Statistics program (version 19; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL), and a two-sided p<0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
- Conditions
- CTEPH, Pulmonary Embolism, Symptoms and Signs, Dyspnea
- Being tested
- dyspnea grade ≥ II according NYHA-WHO
- Keywords
- CTEPH, Pulmonary Embolism, Symptoms and Signs, Dyspnea
- Medical subject headings
- Pulmonary Embolism, Signs and Symptoms, Dyspnea
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
dyspnea grade ≥ II according NYHA-WHODiagnostic test
Intervention Investigator from each center will recover consecutives PE patients and collect baseline, demographic and comorbidities.
In all patients enrolled in the study a short questionnaire regarding dyspnea symptoms will be performed. All patients that refer dyspnea grade ≥ II according NYHA-WHO (6) modified scale will be cited as outpatient to be evaluated
Imaging studies and right heart catheterization is the procedure agreeing with the standard care according to current ESC/ERS Guidelines.
In all patients, the following tests will be performed:
- Pulsioximetry.
- Electrocardiogram.
- Blood sample with determination of NT-ProBNP.
- Echocardiography. Only an echocardiography indicative of PH warrants further evaluation
- V/Q scintigraphy. Possible CTEPH can be assumed when mismatched perfusion defects are detected by VQ scan.
- Right heart catheterization \& Pulmonary CT Scan are required for confirming the diagnosis
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Screening | Experimental | Intervention Investigator from each center will recover consecutives PE patients and collect baseline, demographic and comorbidities.
In all patients enrolled in the study a short questionnaire regarding dyspnea symptoms will be performed. All patients that refer dyspnea grade ≥ II according NYHA-WHO (6) modified scale will be cited as outpatient to be evaluated Imaging studies and right heart catheterization is the procedure agreeing with the standard care according to current ESC/ERS Guidelines.
In all patients, the following tests will be performed:
1. Pulsioximetry.
2. Electrocardiogram.
3. Blood sample with determination of NT-ProBNP.
4. Echocardiography. Only an echocardiography indicative of PH warrants further evaluation
5. V/Q scintigraphy. Possible CTEPH can be assumed when mismatched perfusion defects are detected by VQ scan.
6. Right heart catheterization \& Pulmonary CT Scan are required for confirming the diagnosis Receives: Diagnostic Test: dyspnea grade ≥ II according NYHA-WHO |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of new diagnosis of CTEPH
New diagnosis of CTEPH
Measured: Up 3 years after PE
Secondary outcomes (3)
External validation from score to identify patients at risk to develop CTEPH
external validation from score (Klok FA et al. Derivation of a clinical prediction score for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension after acute pulmonary embolism. J Thromb Haemost. 2016)
Measured: Up 3 years after PE
Derivation of a score to identify high risk population to develop CTEPH
With variables assocciated to CTEPH investigators will obtain derivation and validation of a score to identify high risk population to develop CTEPH
Measured: Up 3 years after PE
Number of patients with Chronic Thromboembolic Disease (CTED) after PE
Describe the number and clinical characteristics of patients with CTED after PE
Measured: Up 3 years after PE
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 May 2019
- Study start16 Jan 2019
- Primary completion31 Dec 2021
- Study completion15 Feb 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for CTEPHStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Model description
- Design Cohorts study in consecutive patients with objectively confirmed PE.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 646 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Luis Jara-Palomares, MD
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, Sociedad Española de Neumología y Cirugía Torácica
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Luis Jara-Palomares, MD, Hospitales Universitarios Virgen del Rocío
- Investigators
- Luis Jara-Palomares, MD, Study director, Medical Surgical Unit of Respiratory Diseases, Virgen del Rocio Hospital, CIBERES
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03953560
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 0034667956480
- Status last verified
- Mar 2022
- First submitted
- 14 May 2019
- Last updated
- 17 Mar 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: Data will be included in RIETE registry. We will done all analyses prestablished and data collected could be used by RIETE investigators
Publications
Marin-Romero S, Ballaz-Quincoces A, Gomez-Cuervo C, Marchena-Yglesias PJ, Lopez-Miguel P, Francisco-Albesa I, Pedrajas-Navas JM, Lumbierres M, Aibar-Arregui MA, Bosco Lopez-Saez J, Perez-Pinar M, Baeza-Martinez C, Riera-Mestre A, Peris-Sifre M, Porras-Ledantes JA, Criado-Garcia J, Elias-Hernandez T, Otero R, Barca-Hernando M, Muriel A, Klok FA, Jara-Palomares L; SYSPPE investigators. Symptom-related screening programme for early detection of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension after acute pulmonary embolism: the SYSPPE study. Thorax. 2024 Jan 18;79(2):144-152. doi: 10.1136/thorax-2023-220580.
PubMed 38050187
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Mar 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Symptom-related Screening Program Following Pulmonary Embolism for Early Detection of Chronic ThromboEmbolic Pulmonary Hypertension (CTEPH)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03953560
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 0034667956480
- Conditions
- CTEPH, Pulmonary Embolism, Symptoms and Signs, Dyspnea
- Keywords
- CTEPH, Pulmonary Embolism, Symptoms and Signs, Dyspnea
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 646 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Luis Jara-Palomares, MDUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, Sociedad Española de Neumología y Cirugía Torácica
- Study start
- 16 Jan 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 15 Feb 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 16 May 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Routine screening for Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) i after PE is not supported by current evidence and guidelines.
This study aims to evaluate if a screening program for patients with acute PE based on telephone monitoring of symptoms and further examination if only symptomatic patients could help an early detection of CTEPH.
Detailed description
Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is a long-term complication following an acute or silent pulmonary embolism (PE). A history of acute PE was reported in 75% of CTEPH patients. Nevertheless, incidence of CTEPH after a confirmed acute PE vary widely depending of the studies, with estimated incidence from 0.5 to 4%. Performing a follow-up examination of patients diagnosed with acute PE regardless of persisting symptoms and using all available technical procedures is not cost-effective. As a consequence, routine screening for CTEPH after PE is not supported by current evidence and guidelines.
CTEPH is a very disabling and mortal disease, although it is a potential curable disease. However, delayed diagnosis and misdiagnosis is common. Patients are frequently diagnosed with CTEPH at advanced stages of the disease leading to worse clinical outcomes. Early diagnosis of CTEPH is essential, as delay in diagnosis may be associated with a worse prognosis, higher perioperative mortality and inoperable diseases stages. Overall, evidence from various sources suggests that early detection and treatment of CTEPH is advantageous in achieving favorable clinical outcomes. Therefore, there is an important unmet need for early diagnosing this disease.
Focusing diagnostic procedures only on symptomatic patients may be a practical approach for detecting relevant CTEPH.
This study aims to evaluate if a screening program for patients with acute PE based on telephone monitoring of symptoms and further examination if only symptomatic patients could help an early detection of CTEPH.
Objectives
- Primary outcome: To estimate the impact of an easy and simple strategy to identify CTEPH.
- Secondary outcomes:
- To identify patients with CTED after PE
- To obtain external validation from scores to identify patients at risk to develop CTEPH
- To develop new score to identify high risk population to develop CTEPH
Hypothesis Conceptual hypothesis: The use of a strategy to detect CTEPH will increase number of patients diagnosed of pulmonary hypertension.
Operational hypothesis: The use of a strategy to detect CTEPH will increase in a 200% the number of patients diagnosed with CTEPH.
Design Cohorts study in consecutive patients with objectively confirmed PE.
Specialists implied Internal medicine, Pulmonologist, Hematologist from 20 hospitals.
Inclusion criteria: 1) Age > 18 year 2) Objectively confirmed diagnosis of acute PE by multidetector CT, V/Q lung scan, or selective pulmonary angiography, according to established diagnostic criteria, with or without symptomatic DVT, 3) Ability of subject to understand the character and consequences of the study, 4) informed consent of the subject. Exclusion criteria: refused informed consent, inability to cooperation.
Intervention Investigator from each center will recover consecutive PE patients and collect baseline, demographic and co-morbidities.
In all patients enrolled in the study a short questionnaire regarding dyspnea symptoms will be performed. All patients that refer dyspnea grade ≥ II according NYHA-WHO modified scale will be cited as outpatient to be evaluated
A written informed consent will be required all patients evaluated in consultant.
Imaging studies and right heart catheterization is the procedure agreeing with the standard care according to current ESC/ERS Guidelines.
In all patients, the following tests will be performed:
- Pulsioximetry.
- Electrocardiogram.
- Blood sample with determination of NT-ProBNP.
- Echocardiography. Only an echocardiography indicative of PH warrants further evaluation
- V/Q scintigraphy. Possible CTEPH can be assumed when mismatched perfusion defects are detected by VQ scan.
- Right heart catheterization \& Pulmonary CT Scan are required for confirming the diagnosis
The relationship of Doppler echocardiography-estimated PASP with right heart catheterization (RHC)-measured PASP was examined using Spearman's correlation coefficients. The Bland-Altman method was then used to assess the agreement between Doppler echocardiography-estimated and RHC measured PASP. Doppler echocardiography-estimated PASP within +/- 10mmHg of the value measured on RHC was considered accurate, consistent with the cutoffs used in other publications.
Secondary outcome include number of patients with chronic thromboembolic disease (CTED), described as chronic thromboembolic pulmonary vascular obstruction with normal resting pulmonary artery pressures.
Treatment: No treatment required
Statistical Plans Sample size calculation We estimate CTEPH prevalence in reference group of 1%, and a prevalence of CTEPH in interventional group of 2.8%. With unilateral test, con confidence level of 95%, statistic power of 80% and losses expected of 25%, we calculated a final sample size of 947.
The investigators calculate that 16-20 centers in Spain are needed to recruit patients
Investigators will compare baseline characteristics of patients with and without CTEPH using chi-square tests for categorical variables and non-parametric rank tests for continuous variables. Cumulative incidence of CTEPH will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier technique.
To do external validation of previous score to predict CTEPH discriminative power by calculating the area under the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve will be done, performing a non-parametric test of the equality of the areas under the ROC curves. Goodness-of-fit of the score points for each score in a logistic regression model using Pearson's chi-square test.
Student's t test and X2 test (or Fisher's exact test where appropriate) will be used to compare continuous or categorical variables, and multivariable analysis through a logistic regression model using the Wald method (step back) to identify independent predictors for the occurrence of CTEPH. Covariates entering in the model will be selected by a significance level of p <0.20 on univariable analysis, or by a well-known association reported in the literature. Then, the investigators will build a prognostic score assigning points to each independent variable according to regression coefficients β, rounding to the nearest integer. The investigators will assign a risk score to each patient by adding up points for each independent variable. Performance will be quantified in terms of calibration using the Hosmer-Lemeshow test. Model discrimination will be assessed using the C-statistic. Internal validity of the score will be confirmed using bootstrap analysis. For the statistical analysis the investigators will use the IBM SPSS Statistics program (version 19; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL), and a two-sided p<0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
- Model description
- Design Cohorts study in consecutive patients with objectively confirmed PE.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Screening | Experimental | Diagnostic Test: dyspnea grade ≥ II according NYHA-WHOIntervention Investigator from each center will recover consecutives PE patients and collect baseline, demographic and comorbidities. In all patients enrolled in the study a short questionnaire regarding dyspnea symptoms will be performed. All patients that refer dyspnea grade ≥ II according NYHA-WHO (6) modified scale will be cited as outpatient to be evaluated Imaging studies and right heart catheterization is the procedure agreeing with the standard care according to current ESC/ERS Guidelines. In all patients, the following tests will be performed: 1. Pulsioximetry. 2. Electrocardiogram. 3. Blood sample with determination of NT-ProBNP. 4. Echocardiography. Only an echocardiography indicative of PH warrants further evaluation 5. V/Q scintigraphy. Possible CTEPH can be assumed when mismatched perfusion defects are detected by VQ scan. 6. Right heart catheterization \& Pulmonary CT Scan are required for confirming the diagnosis |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Age > 18 year
- Objectively confirmed diagnosis of acute PE by multidetector CT, V/Q lung scan, or selective pulmonary angiography, according to established diagnostic criteria, with or without symptomatic DVT,
- Ability of subject to understand the character and consequences of the study,
- informed consent of the subject.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- refused informed consent, inability to cooperation.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| dyspnea grade ≥ II according NYHA-WHOIntervention Investigator from each center will recover consecutives PE patients and collect baseline, demographic and comorbidities. In all patients enrolled in the study a short questionnaire regarding dyspnea symptoms will be performed. All patients that refer dyspnea grade ≥ II according NYHA-WHO (6) modified scale will be cited as outpatient to be evaluated Imaging studies and right heart catheterization is the procedure agreeing with the standard care according to current ESC/ERS Guidelines. In all patients, the following tests will be performed: 1. Pulsioximetry. 2. Electrocardiogram. 3. Blood sample with determination of NT-ProBNP. 4. Echocardiography. Only an echocardiography indicative of PH warrants further evaluation 5. V/Q scintigraphy. Possible CTEPH can be assumed when mismatched perfusion defects are detected by VQ scan. 6. Right heart catheterization \& Pulmonary CT Scan are required for confirming the diagnosis | Diagnostic test | Screening |
Primary outcome
Number of new diagnosis of CTEPH
Time frame: Up 3 years after PE
New diagnosis of CTEPH
3 secondary outcomes
External validation from score to identify patients at risk to develop CTEPH
Time frame: Up 3 years after PE
Derivation of a score to identify high risk population to develop CTEPH
Time frame: Up 3 years after PE
Number of patients with Chronic Thromboembolic Disease (CTED) after PE
Time frame: Up 3 years after PE
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Mar 2022.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38050187Marin-Romero S, Ballaz-Quincoces A, Gomez-Cuervo C, Marchena-Yglesias PJ, Lopez-Miguel P, Francisco-Albesa I, Pedrajas-Navas JM, Lumbierres M, Aibar-Arregui MA, Bosco Lopez-Saez J, Perez-Pinar M, Baeza-Martinez C, Riera-Mestre A, Peris-Sifre M, Porras-Ledantes JA, Criado-Garcia J, Elias-Hernandez T, Otero R, Barca-Hernando M, Muriel A, Klok FA, Jara-Palomares L; SYSPPE investigators. Symptom-related screening programme for early detection of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension after acute pulmonary embolism: the SYSPPE study. Thorax. 2024 Jan 18;79(2):144-152. doi: 10.1136/thorax-2023-220580.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Data will be included in RIETE registry. We will done all analyses prestablished and data collected could be used by RIETE investigators
Related trials for CTEPH
Not yet recruiting
Home-based Inspiratory Muscle Training in Pulmonary Hypertension
Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension, Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension
RecruitingObservational study
Early Detection of CTEPH in Patients After APE
Chronic Pulmonary Thromboembolism
Recruiting
The Effect of Levosimendan on Pulmonary Artery Pressure and Right Ventricular Function in the Perioperative Period in Patients With CTEPH After Pulmonary Thromboendarterectomy
LEVOSIMENDAN, PULMONARY THROMBOENDARTERECTOMY
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study Providing Treatment Access in Participants With Pulmonary Hypertension Completing a Parent Study and Having no Other Option
Hypertension, Pulmonary
Recruiting
Vasopressor Agents in Pulmonary Hypertension Crisis
Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH), Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension (CTEPH)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Luis Jara-Palomares, MD study director
Medical Surgical Unit of Respiratory Diseases, Virgen del Rocio Hospital, CIBERES
16 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing dyspnea grade ≥ II according NYHA-WHO in people with CTEPH and Pulmonary Embolism, run by Luis Jara-Palomares, MD at 16 sites in Spain.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Mar 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 16 sites in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of new diagnosis of CTEPH (time frame: Up 3 years after PE). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03953560, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Mar 2022.