AzTrials
AzTrials

CTEPHNCT03953560

Symptom-related Screening for Early Detection of CTEPH.

A study testing dyspnea grade ≥ II according NYHA-WHO in people with CTEPH and Pulmonary Embolism, run by Luis Jara-Palomares, MD at 16 sites in Spain.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Routine screening for Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) i after PE is not supported by current evidence and guidelines. This study aims to evaluate if a screening program for patients with acute PE based on telephone monitoring of symptoms and further examination if only symptomatic patients could… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
CTEPH, Pulmonary Embolism, Symptoms and Signs
What is being tested?
dyspnea grade ≥ II according NYHA-WHO
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
646 participants
Where
16 sitesSpain
Study dates
16 Jan 2019to 15 Feb 2022
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age > 18 year
  • Objectively confirmed diagnosis of acute PE by multidetector CT, V/Q lung scan, or selective pulmonary angiography, according to established diagnostic criteria, with or without symptomatic DVT,
  • Ability of subject to understand the character and consequences of the study,
  • informed consent of the subject.

Who cannot join

  • refused informed consent, inability to cooperation.

Trial locations and contacts

16 sites in 1 country.

16 sites in 1 country

Spain16 sites
  • Hospital General Universitario de Albacete

    Albacete

  • Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge

    Barcelona

  • Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Deu

    Barcelona

  • Consorcio Hospitalario Provincial de Castellón

    Castellon, Castellon

  • Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía

    Córdoba

  • Hospital Virgen de la Luz

    Cuenca

  • Hospital General Universitario de Elche

    Elche

  • Hospital de Galdakao

    Galdakao, Vizcaya

  • Hospital Universitari de Girona Dr. Josep Trueta

    Girona

  • Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova

    Lleida

  • Hospital Clínico San Carlos

    Madrid

  • Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre

    Madrid

  • Hospital Universitario Puerto Real

    Puerto Real, Cadiz

  • Hospital Virgen del Rocio

    Seville, 41014

  • Hospital Universitario Joan XXIII de Tarragona

    Tarragona

  • Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa

    Zaragoza

Other trials in Spain

About this study

Official title: Symptom-related Screening Program Following Pulmonary Embolism for Early Detection of Chronic ThromboEmbolic Pulmonary Hypertension (CTEPH)

Routine screening for Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) i after PE is not supported by current evidence and guidelines.

This study aims to evaluate if a screening program for patients with acute PE based on telephone monitoring of symptoms and further examination if only symptomatic patients could help an early detection of CTEPH.

Read the detailed description

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is a long-term complication following an acute or silent pulmonary embolism (PE). A history of acute PE was reported in 75% of CTEPH patients. Nevertheless, incidence of CTEPH after a confirmed acute PE vary widely depending of the studies, with estimated incidence from 0.5 to 4%. Performing a follow-up examination of patients diagnosed with acute PE regardless of persisting symptoms and using all available technical procedures is not cost-effective. As a consequence, routine screening for CTEPH after PE is not supported by current evidence and guidelines.

CTEPH is a very disabling and mortal disease, although it is a potential curable disease. However, delayed diagnosis and misdiagnosis is common. Patients are frequently diagnosed with CTEPH at advanced stages of the disease leading to worse clinical outcomes. Early diagnosis of CTEPH is essential, as delay in diagnosis may be associated with a worse prognosis, higher perioperative mortality and inoperable diseases stages. Overall, evidence from various sources suggests that early detection and treatment of CTEPH is advantageous in achieving favorable clinical outcomes. Therefore, there is an important unmet need for early diagnosing this disease.

Focusing diagnostic procedures only on symptomatic patients may be a practical approach for detecting relevant CTEPH.

This study aims to evaluate if a screening program for patients with acute PE based on telephone monitoring of symptoms and further examination if only symptomatic patients could help an early detection of CTEPH.

Objectives

  • Primary outcome: To estimate the impact of an easy and simple strategy to identify CTEPH.
  • Secondary outcomes:
  • To identify patients with CTED after PE
  • To obtain external validation from scores to identify patients at risk to develop CTEPH
  • To develop new score to identify high risk population to develop CTEPH

Hypothesis Conceptual hypothesis: The use of a strategy to detect CTEPH will increase number of patients diagnosed of pulmonary hypertension.

Operational hypothesis: The use of a strategy to detect CTEPH will increase in a 200% the number of patients diagnosed with CTEPH.

Design Cohorts study in consecutive patients with objectively confirmed PE.

Specialists implied Internal medicine, Pulmonologist, Hematologist from 20 hospitals.

Inclusion criteria: 1) Age > 18 year 2) Objectively confirmed diagnosis of acute PE by multidetector CT, V/Q lung scan, or selective pulmonary angiography, according to established diagnostic criteria, with or without symptomatic DVT, 3) Ability of subject to understand the character and consequences of the study, 4) informed consent of the subject. Exclusion criteria: refused informed consent, inability to cooperation.

Intervention Investigator from each center will recover consecutive PE patients and collect baseline, demographic and co-morbidities.

In all patients enrolled in the study a short questionnaire regarding dyspnea symptoms will be performed. All patients that refer dyspnea grade ≥ II according NYHA-WHO modified scale will be cited as outpatient to be evaluated

A written informed consent will be required all patients evaluated in consultant.

Imaging studies and right heart catheterization is the procedure agreeing with the standard care according to current ESC/ERS Guidelines.

In all patients, the following tests will be performed:

  1. Pulsioximetry.
  2. Electrocardiogram.
  3. Blood sample with determination of NT-ProBNP.
  4. Echocardiography. Only an echocardiography indicative of PH warrants further evaluation
  5. V/Q scintigraphy. Possible CTEPH can be assumed when mismatched perfusion defects are detected by VQ scan.
  6. Right heart catheterization \& Pulmonary CT Scan are required for confirming the diagnosis

The relationship of Doppler echocardiography-estimated PASP with right heart catheterization (RHC)-measured PASP was examined using Spearman's correlation coefficients. The Bland-Altman method was then used to assess the agreement between Doppler echocardiography-estimated and RHC measured PASP. Doppler echocardiography-estimated PASP within +/- 10mmHg of the value measured on RHC was considered accurate, consistent with the cutoffs used in other publications.

Secondary outcome include number of patients with chronic thromboembolic disease (CTED), described as chronic thromboembolic pulmonary vascular obstruction with normal resting pulmonary artery pressures.

Treatment: No treatment required

Statistical Plans Sample size calculation We estimate CTEPH prevalence in reference group of 1%, and a prevalence of CTEPH in interventional group of 2.8%. With unilateral test, con confidence level of 95%, statistic power of 80% and losses expected of 25%, we calculated a final sample size of 947.

The investigators calculate that 16-20 centers in Spain are needed to recruit patients

Investigators will compare baseline characteristics of patients with and without CTEPH using chi-square tests for categorical variables and non-parametric rank tests for continuous variables. Cumulative incidence of CTEPH will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier technique.

To do external validation of previous score to predict CTEPH discriminative power by calculating the area under the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve will be done, performing a non-parametric test of the equality of the areas under the ROC curves. Goodness-of-fit of the score points for each score in a logistic regression model using Pearson's chi-square test.

Student's t test and X2 test (or Fisher's exact test where appropriate) will be used to compare continuous or categorical variables, and multivariable analysis through a logistic regression model using the Wald method (step back) to identify independent predictors for the occurrence of CTEPH. Covariates entering in the model will be selected by a significance level of p <0.20 on univariable analysis, or by a well-known association reported in the literature. Then, the investigators will build a prognostic score assigning points to each independent variable according to regression coefficients β, rounding to the nearest integer. The investigators will assign a risk score to each patient by adding up points for each independent variable. Performance will be quantified in terms of calibration using the Hosmer-Lemeshow test. Model discrimination will be assessed using the C-statistic. Internal validity of the score will be confirmed using bootstrap analysis. For the statistical analysis the investigators will use the IBM SPSS Statistics program (version 19; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL), and a two-sided p<0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

Being tested
dyspnea grade ≥ II according NYHA-WHO
Keywords
CTEPH, Pulmonary Embolism, Symptoms and Signs, Dyspnea
Medical subject headings
Pulmonary Embolism, Signs and Symptoms, Dyspnea

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • dyspnea grade ≥ II according NYHA-WHODiagnostic test

    Intervention Investigator from each center will recover consecutives PE patients and collect baseline, demographic and comorbidities.

    In all patients enrolled in the study a short questionnaire regarding dyspnea symptoms will be performed. All patients that refer dyspnea grade ≥ II according NYHA-WHO (6) modified scale will be cited as outpatient to be evaluated

    Imaging studies and right heart catheterization is the procedure agreeing with the standard care according to current ESC/ERS Guidelines.

    In all patients, the following tests will be performed:

    1. Pulsioximetry.
    2. Electrocardiogram.
    3. Blood sample with determination of NT-ProBNP.
    4. Echocardiography. Only an echocardiography indicative of PH warrants further evaluation
    5. V/Q scintigraphy. Possible CTEPH can be assumed when mismatched perfusion defects are detected by VQ scan.
    6. Right heart catheterization \& Pulmonary CT Scan are required for confirming the diagnosis
Study groups in NCT03953560
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
ScreeningExperimentalIntervention Investigator from each center will recover consecutives PE patients and collect baseline, demographic and comorbidities. In all patients enrolled in the study a short questionnaire regarding dyspnea symptoms will be performed. All patients that refer dyspnea grade ≥ II according NYHA-WHO (6) modified scale will be cited as outpatient to be evaluated Imaging studies and right heart catheterization is the procedure agreeing with the standard care according to current ESC/ERS Guidelines. In all patients, the following tests will be performed: 1. Pulsioximetry. 2. Electrocardiogram. 3. Blood sample with determination of NT-ProBNP. 4. Echocardiography. Only an echocardiography indicative of PH warrants further evaluation 5. V/Q scintigraphy. Possible CTEPH can be assumed when mismatched perfusion defects are detected by VQ scan. 6. Right heart catheterization \& Pulmonary CT Scan are required for confirming the diagnosis
Receives: Diagnostic Test: dyspnea grade ≥ II according NYHA-WHO

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of new diagnosis of CTEPH

    New diagnosis of CTEPH

    Measured: Up 3 years after PE

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. External validation from score to identify patients at risk to develop CTEPH

    external validation from score (Klok FA et al. Derivation of a clinical prediction score for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension after acute pulmonary embolism. J Thromb Haemost. 2016)

    Measured: Up 3 years after PE

  2. Derivation of a score to identify high risk population to develop CTEPH

    With variables assocciated to CTEPH investigators will obtain derivation and validation of a score to identify high risk population to develop CTEPH

    Measured: Up 3 years after PE

  3. Number of patients with Chronic Thromboembolic Disease (CTED) after PE

    Describe the number and clinical characteristics of patients with CTED after PE

    Measured: Up 3 years after PE

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted16 May 2019
  2. Study start16 Jan 2019
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2021
  4. Study completion15 Feb 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Model description
Design Cohorts study in consecutive patients with objectively confirmed PE.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
646 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03953560
Sponsor's protocol ID
0034667956480
Status last verified
Mar 2022
First submitted
14 May 2019
Last updated
17 Mar 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: Data will be included in RIETE registry. We will done all analyses prestablished and data collected could be used by RIETE investigators

Publications

  • Marin-Romero S, Ballaz-Quincoces A, Gomez-Cuervo C, Marchena-Yglesias PJ, Lopez-Miguel P, Francisco-Albesa I, Pedrajas-Navas JM, Lumbierres M, Aibar-Arregui MA, Bosco Lopez-Saez J, Perez-Pinar M, Baeza-Martinez C, Riera-Mestre A, Peris-Sifre M, Porras-Ledantes JA, Criado-Garcia J, Elias-Hernandez T, Otero R, Barca-Hernando M, Muriel A, Klok FA, Jara-Palomares L; SYSPPE investigators. Symptom-related screening programme for early detection of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension after acute pulmonary embolism: the SYSPPE study. Thorax. 2024 Jan 18;79(2):144-152. doi: 10.1136/thorax-2023-220580.

    PubMed 38050187

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing dyspnea grade ≥ II according NYHA-WHO in people with CTEPH and Pulmonary Embolism, run by Luis Jara-Palomares, MD at 16 sites in Spain.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Mar 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 16 sites in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of new diagnosis of CTEPH (time frame: Up 3 years after PE). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03953560, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Mar 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in