Tricuspid RegurgitationSTRONGNCT03953755
Surgery in Secondary Tricuspid Regurgitation
A study testing Tricuspid valve repair in people with Tricuspid Regurgitation, run by Saint Petersburg State University, Russia at 1 site in Russia.
Trial summary
Currently, in cardiology/cardiosurgery the indicators for the surgical correction of secondary tricuspid regurgitationare unclear. AIM: To compare right ventricle structural and functional changes after operation in patients with secondary tricuspid regurgitation with severe mitral /aortic valve pathology, requiring… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Tricuspid Regurgitation
- What is being tested?
- Tricuspid valve repair
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 150 participants
- Where
- 1 siteRussia
- Study dates
- 1 Jan 2019to 31 Dec 2027
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age > 18 years
- Indication left-side valve surgery
Who cannot join
- Unwillingness to give informed consent and to enter a regular follow-up program.
- Prior surgical or percutaneous mitral valve intervention
- Contraindication to cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB)
- Clinical signs of cardiogenic shock at the time of randomization
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Surgery of Secondary Tricuspid Regurgitation
Currently, in cardiology/cardiosurgery the indicators for the surgical correction of secondary tricuspid regurgitationare unclear. AIM: To compare right ventricle structural and functional changes after operation in patients with secondary tricuspid regurgitation with severe mitral /aortic valve pathology, requiring surgical intervention; define the factors influencing major adverse cardiac events depending on the operation/non-operation due to moderate tricuspid regurgitation. This study intends to include 200-300 people and will occur over 5 years with an additional 3-year follow-up.
Read the detailed description
Background It has been demonstrated in recent large patient monitoring registers that the presence of even mild secondary tricuspid regurgitation (TR) has a significant effect on life expectancy. Currently, in cardiology/cardiosurgery the indicators for the surgical correction of secondary TR are unclear. In this area, international guidelines lack randomized studies and are based on a C level of evidence. C level evidence is based solely on the opinion of experts, retrospective, and/or observational studies. The first indicator for tricuspid valve (TV) surgery is considered to be a combination of TR with severe aortic or mitral valve lesions that require surgical treatment. However, the level of indicators for moderate corrections in such situations is typically II A-B. At the C level of evidence there is no consensus for surgical treatment of such a defect in the international community. Severe TR indicators are Class I while the evidence remains C level because it is not well established that surgical treatment improves the prognosis of these patients. There is a lack of information about the structural and functional changes of the right ventricle after surgery depending on the degree of TR.
Aims and objectives of studying AIM: To compare right ventricle structural and functional changes after operation in patients with secondary tricuspid regurgitation with severe mitral /aortic valve pathology, requiring surgical intervention; define the factors influencing major adverse cardiac events depending on the operation/non-operation due to moderate tricuspid regurgitation.
OBJECTIVES:
- To study tricuspid regurgitation parameters affecting the long-term prognosis for the surgical correction of severe secondary tricuspid regurgitationof patients with severe aortic/mitral valve pathology requiring surgical treatment.
- To define hemodynamic parameters of patients with moderate tricuspid regurgitation, when surgical treatment of this defect gives an additional improvement in the short-term and long-term prognosis following surgical treatment of severe aortic/mitral valve diseases.
- To study changes in contractility parameters in the right ventricle and tricuspid valve function after reconstructive surgery over a period of 3 years.
Methods and study plans This study intends to include 200-300 people and will occur over 5 years with an additional 3-year follow-up.
Inclusion criterion: 1) Signed informed consent form, 2) Previously diagnosed aortic or mitral heart diseases requiring surgical treatment, 3) Over 18 years of age 4) The presence of moderate or severe secondary tricuspid insufficiency.
Exclusion criterion: 1) Significant oncology diseases with a known prognosis of a less than 1 year life expectancy.
Cardiologist examination and survey. Echocardiography All patients will undergo standard echocardiography, including a detailed study of the function and sizes of the right ventricle and right atrium, and measurement of global longitudinal left ventricular deformations using the Speckle Tracking method, peak systolic and diastolic blood flow velocity in TV, fractional changes in area, and tricuspid annulus systolic excursion. Tricuspid regurgitation will be measured according to the standards of EAE/ASE, and will also use the recent 3-tiered classification system of severe insufficiency.
Laboratory techniques Standard for surgical treatment of aortic/mitral valve Coronary catheterization Standard for surgical treatment of aortic/mitral valve, Plan I. Initial visit - cardiologist/cardiosurgeon clinical evaluation - survey and examination II. Echocardiography study - screening - defining degree of tricuspid regurgitation III. Common tests for surgical treatment of aortic/mitral valve IV. Patient randomization with only a moderate degree of TR V. Surgical treatment VI. 30-40 days after surgery - cardiologist examination VII. 90 days after surgery ¬ - cardiologist examination + echocardiography VIII. 1 year after surgery - cardiologist examination + echocardiography IX. 3 years after surgery - cardiologist examination + echocardiography Expected benefits for patients All patients will receive advanced tests using the latest safe ultrasound methods. Frequent echocardiography and patient observations can reveal possible complications after cardiac surgery for aortic/mitral diseases; This study will allow for the correction of drug therapy due to extended diagnosis.
Severe lesions of the tricuspid valve and aortic / mitral heart defects will be corrected in all patients.
New and / or untested methods of treatment will not be used in this study. All surgical procedures will already have undergone testing and been proven effective for the treatment of heart diseases.
- Conditions
- Tricuspid Regurgitation
- Being tested
- Tricuspid valve repair
- Keywords
- tricuspid regurgitation, tricuspid surgery, moderate tricispid
- Medical subject headings
- Tricuspid Valve Insufficiency
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Tricuspid valve repairProcedure or surgery
Tricuspid valve repair
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Control 1 | No intervention | no/mild tricuspid regurgitation - left-side surgery alone |
| moderate TR - left-side surgery | No intervention | moderate tricuspid regurgitation - left-side surgery alone |
| moderate TR - left-side surgery+TVS | Experimental | moderate tricuspid regurgitation - left-side surgery+tricuspid valve surgery Receives: Procedure: Tricuspid valve repair |
| Control 2 | No intervention | tricuspid regurgitation - left-side surgery +tricuspid valve surgery |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Difference in end-diastolic dimension
Difference in end-diastolic dimension of right ventricle between of pre- and post- operation
Measured: 3 month, 1 year, 3 year
Difference in tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion
Difference in TAPSE between of pre- and post- operation
Measured: 3 month, 1 year, 3 year
Difference in right atrium volume index
Difference in right atrium volume index between of pre- and post- operation
Measured: 3 month, 1 year, 3 year
Difference in fraction of area contraction of right ventricle
Difference in fraction of area contraction between pre- and post- operation
Measured: 3 month, 1 year, 3 year
Difference in right ventricle global strain rate
Difference in right ventricle global strain rate between of pre- and post- operation
Measured: 3 month, 1 year, 3 year
tricuspid regurgitant volume
tricuspid regurgitant volume
Measured: 3 month, 1 year, 3 year
vtricuspid effective regurgitant oriface
tricuspid effective regurgitant oriface
Measured: 3 month, 1 year, 3 year
square of tricuspid regurgitation
square of tricuspid regurgitation
Measured: 3 month, 1 year, 3 year
Secondary outcomes (2)
major adverse cardiac events
death, myocardial infarction, new hospital readmission, heart transplant, ventricular assist device implantation, aborted sudden death, pulmonary oedema
Measured: 3 month, 1 year, 3 year
rate of all-cause death
all-cause death
Measured: 3 month, 1 year, 3 year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 May 2019
- Study start1 Jan 2019
- Primary completion31 Dec 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Dec 2027 (estimated)
Why it stopped: Slow recruitment
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Tricuspid RegurgitationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 150 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Saint Petersburg State University, Russia
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Efremov Sergey, Saint Petersburg State University, Russia
- Investigators
- Dmitry Shmatov, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Saint Petersburg State University, Russia
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03953755
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 5/2018
- Acronym
- STRONG
- Status last verified
- Oct 2022
- First submitted
- 4 May 2019
- Last updated
- 20 Oct 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Study protocol
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 Oct 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Surgery of Secondary Tricuspid Regurgitation
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03953755
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- STRONG / 5/2018
- Conditions
- Tricuspid Regurgitation
- Keywords
- tricuspid regurgitation, tricuspid surgery, moderate tricispid
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- SuspendedReason stopped: Slow recruitment
- Enrolment
- 150 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Saint Petersburg State University, RussiaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jan 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 17 May 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Currently, in cardiology/cardiosurgery the indicators for the surgical correction of secondary tricuspid regurgitationare unclear. AIM: To compare right ventricle structural and functional changes after operation in patients with secondary tricuspid regurgitation with severe mitral /aortic valve pathology, requiring surgical intervention; define the factors influencing major adverse cardiac events depending on the operation/non-operation due to moderate tricuspid regurgitation. This study intends to include 200-300 people and will occur over 5 years with an additional 3-year follow-up.
Detailed description
Background It has been demonstrated in recent large patient monitoring registers that the presence of even mild secondary tricuspid regurgitation (TR) has a significant effect on life expectancy. Currently, in cardiology/cardiosurgery the indicators for the surgical correction of secondary TR are unclear. In this area, international guidelines lack randomized studies and are based on a C level of evidence. C level evidence is based solely on the opinion of experts, retrospective, and/or observational studies. The first indicator for tricuspid valve (TV) surgery is considered to be a combination of TR with severe aortic or mitral valve lesions that require surgical treatment. However, the level of indicators for moderate corrections in such situations is typically II A-B. At the C level of evidence there is no consensus for surgical treatment of such a defect in the international community. Severe TR indicators are Class I while the evidence remains C level because it is not well established that surgical treatment improves the prognosis of these patients. There is a lack of information about the structural and functional changes of the right ventricle after surgery depending on the degree of TR.
Aims and objectives of studying AIM: To compare right ventricle structural and functional changes after operation in patients with secondary tricuspid regurgitation with severe mitral /aortic valve pathology, requiring surgical intervention; define the factors influencing major adverse cardiac events depending on the operation/non-operation due to moderate tricuspid regurgitation.
OBJECTIVES:
- To study tricuspid regurgitation parameters affecting the long-term prognosis for the surgical correction of severe secondary tricuspid regurgitationof patients with severe aortic/mitral valve pathology requiring surgical treatment.
- To define hemodynamic parameters of patients with moderate tricuspid regurgitation, when surgical treatment of this defect gives an additional improvement in the short-term and long-term prognosis following surgical treatment of severe aortic/mitral valve diseases.
- To study changes in contractility parameters in the right ventricle and tricuspid valve function after reconstructive surgery over a period of 3 years.
Methods and study plans This study intends to include 200-300 people and will occur over 5 years with an additional 3-year follow-up.
Inclusion criterion: 1) Signed informed consent form, 2) Previously diagnosed aortic or mitral heart diseases requiring surgical treatment, 3) Over 18 years of age 4) The presence of moderate or severe secondary tricuspid insufficiency.
Exclusion criterion: 1) Significant oncology diseases with a known prognosis of a less than 1 year life expectancy.
Cardiologist examination and survey. Echocardiography All patients will undergo standard echocardiography, including a detailed study of the function and sizes of the right ventricle and right atrium, and measurement of global longitudinal left ventricular deformations using the Speckle Tracking method, peak systolic and diastolic blood flow velocity in TV, fractional changes in area, and tricuspid annulus systolic excursion. Tricuspid regurgitation will be measured according to the standards of EAE/ASE, and will also use the recent 3-tiered classification system of severe insufficiency.
Laboratory techniques Standard for surgical treatment of aortic/mitral valve Coronary catheterization Standard for surgical treatment of aortic/mitral valve, Plan I. Initial visit - cardiologist/cardiosurgeon clinical evaluation - survey and examination II. Echocardiography study - screening - defining degree of tricuspid regurgitation III. Common tests for surgical treatment of aortic/mitral valve IV. Patient randomization with only a moderate degree of TR V. Surgical treatment VI. 30-40 days after surgery - cardiologist examination VII. 90 days after surgery ¬ - cardiologist examination + echocardiography VIII. 1 year after surgery - cardiologist examination + echocardiography IX. 3 years after surgery - cardiologist examination + echocardiography Expected benefits for patients All patients will receive advanced tests using the latest safe ultrasound methods. Frequent echocardiography and patient observations can reveal possible complications after cardiac surgery for aortic/mitral diseases; This study will allow for the correction of drug therapy due to extended diagnosis.
Severe lesions of the tricuspid valve and aortic / mitral heart defects will be corrected in all patients.
New and / or untested methods of treatment will not be used in this study. All surgical procedures will already have undergone testing and been proven effective for the treatment of heart diseases.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Control 1 | No intervention | –no/mild tricuspid regurgitation - left-side surgery alone |
| moderate TR - left-side surgery | No intervention | –moderate tricuspid regurgitation - left-side surgery alone |
| moderate TR - left-side surgery+TVS | Experimental | Procedure: Tricuspid valve repairmoderate tricuspid regurgitation - left-side surgery+tricuspid valve surgery |
| Control 2 | No intervention | –tricuspid regurgitation - left-side surgery +tricuspid valve surgery |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Age > 18 years
- Indication left-side valve surgery
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Unwillingness to give informed consent and to enter a regular follow-up program.
- Prior surgical or percutaneous mitral valve intervention
- Contraindication to cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB)
- Clinical signs of cardiogenic shock at the time of randomization
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Tricuspid valve repairTricuspid valve repair | Procedure or surgery | moderate TR - left-side surgery+TVS |
Primary outcome
Difference in end-diastolic dimension
Time frame: 3 month, 1 year, 3 year
Difference in end-diastolic dimension of right ventricle between of pre- and post- operation
Difference in tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion
Time frame: 3 month, 1 year, 3 year
Difference in TAPSE between of pre- and post- operation
Difference in right atrium volume index
Time frame: 3 month, 1 year, 3 year
Difference in right atrium volume index between of pre- and post- operation
Difference in fraction of area contraction of right ventricle
Time frame: 3 month, 1 year, 3 year
Difference in fraction of area contraction between pre- and post- operation
Difference in right ventricle global strain rate
Time frame: 3 month, 1 year, 3 year
Difference in right ventricle global strain rate between of pre- and post- operation
tricuspid regurgitant volume
Time frame: 3 month, 1 year, 3 year
tricuspid regurgitant volume
vtricuspid effective regurgitant oriface
Time frame: 3 month, 1 year, 3 year
tricuspid effective regurgitant oriface
square of tricuspid regurgitation
Time frame: 3 month, 1 year, 3 year
square of tricuspid regurgitation
2 secondary outcomes
major adverse cardiac events
Time frame: 3 month, 1 year, 3 year
rate of all-cause death
Time frame: 3 month, 1 year, 3 year
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 Oct 2022.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Study protocol
Related trials for Tricuspid Regurgitation
RecruitingObservational study
A Post-Market Assessment of the Safety and Performance of the TriClip™ System
Tricuspid Regurgitation (TR)
Not yet recruiting
TRI-SUCCESS - Tricuspid Regurgitation Study of the Unica™ Cross-Caval System for the Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety in Significant TR Subjects
Tricuspid Regurgitation, Tricuspid Regurgitation Functional
Recruiting
Innoventric Trillium™ Stent Graft Early Feasibility Study (EFS)
Tricuspid Regurgitation, Tricuspid Regurgitation Functional
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Evaluation of a Management Algorithm for TAVI Patients With Concomitant Mitral or Tricuspid Regurgitation
Aortic Stenosis, Mitral Regurgitation
Recruiting
Tricuspid Regurgitation Treatment With LAPLACE Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Replacement System
Severe Tricuspid Valve Regurgitation, Tricuspid Valve Regurgitation
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Dmitry Shmatov, MD, PhD principal investigator
Saint Petersburg State University, Russia
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Tricuspid valve repair in people with Tricuspid Regurgitation, run by Saint Petersburg State University, Russia at 1 site in Russia.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: paused, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Oct 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Russia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Difference in end-diastolic dimension (time frame: 3 month, 1 year, 3 year). The study lists 8 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Oct 2022.