AzTrials
AzTrials

End Stage Renal DiseasePhase 4ESCAPE-PDNCT03953950

Effect of Add-on Spironolactone to Losartan Versus Losartan Alone on Peritoneal Membrane Among Peritoneal Dialysis Patients

A Phase 4 study testing Spironolactone and Losartan in people with End Stage Renal Disease and Peritoneal Dialysis, run by Chiang Mai University at 1 site in Thailand.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The ESCAPE-PD (Effects of add-on SpironolaCtone to losartan versus Alone on Peritoneal mEmbrane among continuous ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis patients) study is a randomized, open-label, single center, active-controlled clinical trial. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
End Stage Renal Disease, Peritoneal Dialysis
What is being tested?
Spironolactone and Losartan
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
84 participants
Where
1 siteThailand
Study dates
Oct 2019to Dec 2020
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age ≥ 18 years or older (both male and female patients)
  • Incidence or prevalent end-stage kidney disease patients undergoing CAPD
  • Had standard dialysis prescription for at least 30 days before screening
  • History of hypertension
  • Stable clinical condition without any inflammation at least 4 weeks prior to enrolment
  • Had an ability to understand and willingness to sign an informed consent statement

Who cannot join

  • Serum potassium concentration of ≥ 5.5 milliequivalent /liter
  • History of severe or active cardiovascular and/or cerebrovascular disease
  • History of renal artery stenosis
  • Uncontrolled hypertension
  • Contraindication to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin II receptor blockers or mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists
  • Pregnancy
Show all 13Show fewer
  • Recent PD-related peritonitis or exit-site and tunnel infection (within 2 months of screening)
  • Had planned to have kidney transplantation or transfer to other PD centers with 6 months
  • Prognosis for survival less than 12 months
  • Any conditions (both mental or physical) that would interfere with the participant's ability to comply with the study protocol
  • Any disease of the abdominal wall, such as injury or surgery, burns, hernia, dermatitis, inflammatory bowel diseases (Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis or diverticulitis) that in the opinion of the Investigator would preclude the patient from being able to have PD
  • Any intra-abdominal tumors or intestinal obstruction
  • Current or recent (within 30 days) exposure to others investigational medicinal products

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Thailand1 site
  • Pharmacoepidemiology and Statistics Research Center, Faculty of Pharmacy, Chiang Mai University

    Chiang Mai, 50200

Other trials in Thailand

About this study

Official title: Effect of Add-on Spironolactone to Losartan Versus Losartan Alone on Peritoneal Membrane Among Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis Patients: An Open-Label Randomized-Controlled Trial

The ESCAPE-PD (Effects of add-on SpironolaCtone to losartan versus Alone on Peritoneal mEmbrane among continuous ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis patients) study is a randomized, open-label, single center, active-controlled clinical trial. Adults end-stage kidney disease patients 18 years or older undergoing continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) will be enrolled. A total 84 CAPD will be randomly assigned to either the combination of spironolactone and losartan (experimental arm) or losartan alone (control arm). The primary outcomes are the difference in peritoneal dialysate effluent cancer antigen-125 (CA-125) and peritoneal equilibration test (PET) indices (dialysate-to-plasma creatinine ratio, 4-hour ultrafiltration volume, and the concentration of glucose present in the solution at the start of the test). Secondary outcome measures include laboratory and mechanistic outcome measures, nutrition outcomes, health-related quality of life, physical function, clinical events, and safety profiles. Results will be disseminated to suggest a strategy to prevent the peritoneal membrane function among CAPD patients through peer-reviewed publications along with scientific meetings.

Read the detailed description

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is one of the methods of renal replacement therapy (RRT) that can easily perform at home. The declared "PD first" policy from the National Health Security Office causes rapidly expansion of this group of patients. In the year 2013, the current study in Thailand showed that the patients enrolled for peritoneal dialysis accumulated for more than 15,000 people. It works continuously similar to the actual function of the kidneys in normal people. In addition, PD also helps to slow the decline of remaining kidney function (residual renal function), which is very important and affect in decreasing mortality rate in this group of patients. However, PD has several limitations such as complications from the infection and high failure rate associated with a dysfunction of the peritoneal membrane during long-term treatment. Approximately 4-12 percent of patients will have ultrafiltration failure and volume overload in the first couple of years of treatment and soar to 30-50 percent in patients treated for more than six years.

The causes of peritoneal membrane deterioration are exposure to incompatible dialysis solution with hyperosmolar glucose content, acidic pH, reactions to PD catheter material, uremia and peritonitis. The alterations of structural and functional of the peritoneal membrane after exposed to these several insults are epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT), and increase in peritoneal solute transport, which consequently leading to peritoneal dialysis failure. It has been already demonstrated that the local renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) plays a key role in this regulation by promoting the activation of neoangiogenesis and fibrotic pathways.

According to the pathophysiologic changes of the peritoneal membrane, Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitors (ACEIs) and Angiotensin Receptor Blockers (ARBs) are adapted to be use in respect of membrane preserving agents. Many studies, both in human and animal models, demonstrate the protective effect against peritoneal membrane deterioration by inhibiting the formation of transforming growth factor beta1 (TGF-β1), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and decreasing progression rate of small to high transport membrane type. In fact, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) seem to have higher efficacy than ACEIs/ARBs in some experimental models. The possible mechanism is the effects of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists that not only inhibit the formation of TGF- β1 and VEGF, but also suppress intracellular Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) generation, activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) 1/2, and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), the substrates responsible for aldosterone induces alterations in cell phenotype. A prospective cohort study of 23 CAPD patients was conducted and evaluated the effect of spironolactone on peritoneal membrane. The result showed the possible benefit of spironolactone in slowing the decline of peritoneal function, suppressing the elevation of profibrotic markers, and increasing mesothelial cell mass.

As a result of the clinical practice, most of CAPD patients tend to receive ACEIs/ARBs as prescribe by the clinicians, in order to control blood pressure, raise serum potassium level, and others compelling indications. Thus, the concept of add-on MRAs to ACEIs/ARBs, desiring the synergistic effects of these 2 drugs group, for membrane preservation is challenge. Notwithstanding the fact that current evidence about the combination effects of ACEIs/ARBs with MRAs is limited in term of quality of the study, sample size, inadequate follow-up period, and poor sensitive parameter in assessing the structural and functional changes of the peritoneal membrane. Thereby, this study aims to evaluate the effect of add-on spironolactone to losartan versus losartan alone on membrane preservation in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients.

Being tested
Spironolactone, Losartan
Keywords
Peritoneal Dialysis, Peritoneal Membrane, Spironolactone, Losartan, Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System
Medical subject headings
Kidney Failure, Chronic

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • SpironolactoneDrug

    Spironolactone Starting dose: 25 mg/day Target dose: 100 mg/day Titration: every 1-2 weeks, based on BP (keep< 140/90 mmHg, but avoid hypotension <90/60 mmHg), and serum potassium level (<5.5 milliequivalent /liter)

  • LosartanDrug

    Losartan Starting dose: 50 mg/day Target dose: 100 mg/day Titration: every 1-2 weeks, based on BP (keep< 140/90 mmHg, but avoid hypotension <90/60 mmHg), and serum potassium level (<5.5 milliequivalent /liter)

Study groups in NCT03953950
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Combination of spironolactone and losartanExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: Spironolactone; Drug: Losartan
Losartan AloneActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Drug: Losartan

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Peritoneal dialysate effluent CA-125

    Using a commercial microparticle enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

    Measured: 6 months

  2. PET indices

    PET indices including dialysate-to-plasma creatinine ratio [D/P Cr], 4-hour ultrafiltration (UF) volume, and the concentration of glucose present in the solution at the start of the test [D/D0]) measured using a modified PET method (performed using 2,000 mL of 2.5% glucose solution).

    Measured: 6 months

Secondary outcomes (13)
  1. Changes in dialysate adequacy by Weekly kt/V

    Measured: 6 months

  2. Changes in dialysate adequacy by weekly creatinine clearance

    Measured: 6 months

  3. Changes in serum albumin concentration

    Measured: 6 months

  4. Changes in serum potassium concentration

    Measured: 6 months

  5. Changes in waist circumference

    Measured: 6 months

  6. Changes in body mass index (BMI)

    Weight and height will be combined to report BMI in kg/m^2

    Measured: 6 months

  7. Changes in Nutritional status

    Using Subjective Global Assessment (SGA)

    Measured: 6 months

  8. Changes in Malnutrition-Inflammation Score (MIS)

    Measured: 6 months

  9. Changes in participant quality of life score

    Using Kidney Disease Quality of Life-36 (KDQOL-36 Version 1.3)

    Measured: 6 months

  10. Changes in health utility

    Using EuroQOL-5 dimension 5-level (EQ-5D-5L)

    Measured: 6 months

  11. Changes in disease-specific Thai quality of life score

    Using the 9-Thai Health status AssessmentInstrument (9-THAI) questionnaire

    Measured: 6 months

  12. Changes in participant well-being score

    Using the World Health Organization-Five (WHO-5) well-being index

    Measured: 6 months

  13. Number of participants with disability

    Using the Barthel activities daily life index

    Measured: 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted17 May 2019
  2. Study startOct 2019 (estimated)
  3. Primary completionSep 2020 (estimated)
  4. Study completionDec 2020 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
84 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03953950
Sponsor's protocol ID
THOR Study Group
Acronym
ESCAPE-PD
Status last verified
Aug 2019
First submitted
20 Apr 2019
Last updated
4 Sep 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Hasegawa T, Nishiwaki H, Ota E, Levack WM, Noma H. Aldosterone antagonists for people with chronic kidney disease requiring dialysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Feb 15;2(2):CD013109. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013109.pub2.

    PubMed 33586138

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Spironolactone and Losartan in people with End Stage Renal Disease and Peritoneal Dialysis, run by Chiang Mai University at 1 site in Thailand.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Sep 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Thailand. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Peritoneal dialysate effluent CA-125 (time frame: 6 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03953950, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Sep 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in