Pulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveNCT03954132
Spiolto® Respimat® (Tiotropium/Olodaterol) Versus Triple Combination Therapy in Everyday Clinical Treatment Practice for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (EVELUT®)
An observational study of Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, run by Boehringer Ingelheim at 75 sites in Germany.
Trial summary
Open-label comparative multicentric cohort study in COPD patients with LABA/ICS, switched to either tiotropium/olodaterol and observed for 12 weeks approximately. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 40 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
- What is being tested?
- Spiolto® Respimat® and Triple-Therapy (LAMA/LABA/ICS)
- How many people
- 469 participants
- Where
- 75 sitesGermany
- Study dates
- 7 Jun 2019to 30 Sep 2021
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 40 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Study is based on newly collected data from approximately 900 COPD patients from 150 recruiting sites in Germany.
Who may be able to join
- Patients can be included if all of the following criteria are met:
- Diagnosis of COPD
- Symptomatic (with regard to dyspnea (mMRC Dyspnea score ≥1) AND with regard to symptoms (CAT Score ≥10) at the same time)
- Patients on LABA/ICS maintenance therapy who are switched to Spiolto® Respimat® in the new reusable inhaler or a free/fixed triple combination of LABA + LAMA + ICS at Visit 1 at the discretion of the treating physician.
- Adults who are contractually capable and mentally able to understand and follow the instructions of the study personnel
- Male or female
Show all 9Show fewer
- Patients aged ≥40 years of age
- Written informed consent prior to study participation
- The patient is willing and able to follow the procedures outlined in the protocol
Who cannot join
- Patients with contraindications acc. to SmPC
- Patients not on LABA/ICS maintenance treatment at visit 1, e.g., mono or dual bronchodilation only, ICS only, or a triple combination of LAMA + LABA + ICS (either as a fixed combination product or as separate components)
- Lack of informed consent
- Pregnant and/or lactating females
- Acute exacerbation of COPD (within 4 weeks prior to Visit 1)
- Frequently exacerbating patients, i. e. patients with ≥2 moderate exacerbations within the last 12 months or ≥1 exacerbation leading to hospitalization within the last 12 months
Show all 15Show fewer
- Acute respiratory failure (pH <7,35 and/ or respiratory rate >30/min within 3 months prior to Visit 1)
- History or current diagnosis of asthma
- History or current diagnosis of asthma-COPD overlap
- History or current diagnosis of allergic rhinitis within the last 5 years
- History or current diagnosis of lung cancer within the last 5 years
- Participation in a parallel interventional clinical trial
- mild exacerbation: additional use of short-acting bronchodilators and treated by the patient without consulting a physician
- moderate exacerbation: treatment includes medical prescription of a systemic corticosteroid and/or antibiotic
- severe exacerbation: exacerbation leading to hospitalization
Trial locations and contacts
75 sites in 1 country.
75 sites in 1 country
Germany75 sites
Dr. Graubner
Bad Sachsa, 37441
Dr. Junggeburth
Bad Wörishofen, 86825
Dr. Heinz
Bergisch Gladbach, 51429
Praxis E. Hossbach
Berkatal, 37297
Praxis an der Oper
Berlin, 10625
Dr. Urban
Berlin, 10711
Praxis A.Sahan/S. Erbil-Sahan
Berlin, 12049
Dr. Kopf
Berlin, 12459
Dr. Schwittay
Böhlen B Leipzig, 04564
Dres. Pabst/Schlünz
Bonn, 53123
Dres. Bartels/Bartels
Breuberg, 64747
Dr. Grimm-Sachs
Bruchsal, 76646
Praxis B. Metzlaff
Büchen, 21514
Ambulantes Zentrum
Cottbus, 03050
Lungenzentrum Darmstadt
Darmstadt, 64283
Hausarzt Deggingen
Deggingen, 73326
Dres. Tietjens
Dortmund, 44135
Dr. Schwiese
Duisburg, 47051
Schwerpunktpraxis
Düsseldorf, 40217
Dr. Schmorell
Forchheim, Oberfr, 91301
Praxis A. Xanthopoulos
Fürstenwalde, 15517
Dr. Sommer
Garmisch-Partenkirchen, 82467
Dres. Ern/Trilling
Gelsenkirchen, 45879
Dr. Birkner
Gelsenkirchen, 45881
Praxis C. Staack/Z. Zadrozny
Gelsenkirchen, 45891
Das HausarztZentrum
Grafenrheinfeld, 97506
Dres. Coesfeld/Gams/Gams
Gütersloh, 33330
Pneumologicum Halle
Halle, 06108
MVZ Martha-Maria gGmbH
Halle, 06110
Dr. Knolinski
Hamburg, 22459
Dres. Kaase/Lepinat
Hamburg, 22529
Dr. Abenhardt
Heidelberg, Neckar, 69115
Dr. Koch
Heilbad Heiligenstadt, 37308
Dres Stolpe/ Roß
Ibbenbueren, 49477
Dres. Lehmann/Schulze und Partner
Jerichow, 39319
Dr. Beckmann
Kamen, Westf, 59174
Praxis G. Mohanty
Kamp-Lintfort, 47475
Dr. Auge
Koblenz Am Rhein, 56068
Dres. Lehmann/Schulze und Partner
Köthen, 06366
Dr. Pfitzer
Kronach, Oberfr, 96317
Dres. Alshut/Weberling
Lahnau, 35633
Dr. Einenkel
Leipzig, 04109
Dr. Geßner
Leipzig, 04357
Dr. Pitule
Ludwigshafen am Rhein, 67061
Dr. Hladik
Ludwigshafen am Rhein, 67063
Dr. Saur
Mannheim, 68161
Dres. Jerrentrup/Mronga
Marburg, 35037
Dr. Jansen
Menden (Sauerland), 58706
Dr. Ingerl
Mosbach, Baden, 74821
Dr. Feimer
München, 80539
Thoraxzentrum Bez. Unterfranken
Münnerstadt, 97702
Praxis Th. Hagen
Neumarkt in der Oberpfalz, 92318
Praxis W. Wuttke
Nuremberg, 90478
Dr. Laser
Nürnberg, Mittelfr, 90409
MVZ OB-Sterkrade GmbH
Oberhausen, Rheinl, 46149
Dr. Müller
Potsdam, 14467
Dres. Hennig/Mikes
Radebeul, 01445
Dr. Dinh
Rathenow, 14712
Zentrum für Onkologie
Rostock, 18107
Lungenfachzentrum Rhein-Main
Rüsselsheim am Main, 65428
Lungenzentrum Schleswig
Schleswig, 24837
Dres. Korupp/Rose
Schweinfurt, 97421
Dr. Theuer
Seelow, 15306
Praxis S. Schmidt
Siegen, 57072
Dres. Knöbel und Partner
Straubing, 94315
Dr. Rother
Strausberg, 15344
Marienhospital Stuttgart
Stuttgart, 70199
Dr. Schmidt-Reinwald
Trier, 54292
Lungenzentrum Ulm
Ulm, Donau, 89073
Dres. Günther/Günther
Viernheim, 68519
Dres. Waltert/Esselmann
Warendorf, 48231
Dres. Herold/Kaa
Weißenburg I Bay, 91781
Dres. Fried/Rubin
Wiesbaden, 65183
Dr. Franz
Witten, 58452
Dr. Weber
Witten, 58452
About this study
Official title: EVELUT®: Assessment of Dyspnea and Other Symptoms as Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO) in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Symptomatic on LABA/ICS Maintenance Therapy (Now) Treated With Spiolto® Respimat® (Tiotropium/Olodaterol) in Comparison to Open or Fixed Triple Combination Treatment in Routine Clinical Practice
Open-label comparative multicentric cohort study in COPD patients with LABA/ICS, switched to either tiotropium/olodaterol and observed for 12 weeks approximately.
Read the detailed description
COPD patients on LABA/ICS maintenance therapy with dyspnea (mMRC ≥ 1) and other symptoms (CATTM ≥ 10), who are switched to either Spiolto® Respimat® in the new reusable inhaler or any triple therapy (LAMA + LABA + ICS) as an open or fixed combination according to approved SmPCs at baseline at the discretion of their attending physician.
- Conditions
- Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
- Being tested
- Spiolto® Respimat®, Triple-Therapy (LAMA/LABA/ICS)
- Medical subject headings
- Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Spiolto® Respimat®Drug
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) patients who were symptomatic (dyspneic) despite Long-acting beta2 adrenoceptor agonist/Inhalative Corticosteroids (LABA/ICS) maintenance treatment were switched to Spiolto® Respimat® inhaler by their attending physician in an real-world setting.
Triple-Therapy (LAMA/LABA/ICS)Drug
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) patients who were symptomatic (dyspneic) despite Long-acting beta2 adrenoceptor agonist/Inhalative Corticosteroids (LABA/ICS) maintenance treatment were switched to any triple therapy Long-acting muscarinic antagonist + Long-acting beta2 adrenoceptor agonist + Inhalative Corticosteroids (LAMA + LABA + ICS) by their attending physician in an real-world setting.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Spiolto® Respimat® | Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) patients who were symptomatic (dyspneic) despite Long-acting beta2 adrenoceptor agonist/Inhalative Corticosteroids (LABA/ICS) maintenance treatment were switched to Spiolto® Respimat® inhaler by their attending physician in an real-world setting. Receives: Drug: Spiolto® Respimat® | |
| Triple-Therapy (LAMA/LABA/ICS) | Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) patients who were symptomatic (dyspneic) despite Long-acting beta2 adrenoceptor agonist/Inhalative Corticosteroids (LABA/ICS) maintenance treatment were switched to any triple therapy Long-acting muscarinic antagonist + Long-acting beta2 adrenoceptor agonist + Inhalative Corticosteroids (LAMA + LABA + ICS) by their attending physician in an real-world setting. Receives: Drug: Triple-Therapy (LAMA/LABA/ICS) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in Modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) Score Between Baseline and After End of Observation
Change in mMRC (modified Medical Research Council) score between baseline and after end of observation (ca. 12 weeks of treatment, Visit 2). The modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) scale is a 5-point (0-4) scale based on the severity of dyspnoea, where a 0 is the best possible score with no disability and 4 is the worst possible score representing the most severity. The mMRC will be used to assess the breathlessness state of the patient with just one question: "When do you experience dyspnoea?", covering five everyday activities, potentially leading to dyspnoea and giving an according rate of 0 to 4 points. The Minimum Clinically Important Difference (MCID) is a change of 1.0 point. Change calculated as Visit 1 - Visit 2.
Measured: Baseline at Visit 1 (day 0) and Visit 2 (planned at 12 week, up to a maximum of 42 weeks).
Change in CATᵀᴹ (COPD Assessment Test) Score Between Baseline and After End of Observation (ca. 12 Weeks of Treatment)
The Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Assessment Test (CATᵀᴹ) was developed as a simple instrument to assess health status in patients with COPD. The CATᵀᴹ consists of eight items, each formatted as a semantic six-point differential scale, making the tool easy to administer and easy for patients to complete. These eight items cover cough, phlegm, chest tightness, breathlessness when going up hills/stairs, activity limitations at home, confidence leaving home, sleep and energy. Each item is scored from 0 to 5. Total CAT score is calculated as the sum over the 8 items, resulting in a total score ranging from 0 to 40, corresponding to the best and worst health status in patients with COPD, respectively. The Minimum Clinically Important Difference (MCID) is a change of 2.0 points. Change is calculated as Visit 1 - Visit 2.
Measured: Baseline at Visit 1 (day 0) and Visit 2 (planned at 12 week, up to a maximum of 42 weeks).
Secondary outcomes (5)
Patients' General Condition According to the Physician's Global Evaluation (PGE) Score at Baseline
The treating physician used the Physician's Global Evaluation (PGE) to evaluate the general condition of the patient on an 8-point ordinal scale from 1-2 (poor), 3-4 (satisfactory), 5-6 (good) to 7-8 (excellent).
Measured: Baseline at Visit 1 (day 0)
Patients' General Condition According to the Physician's Global Evaluation (PGE) Score at the End of the Observation Period
The treating physician will use the Physician's Global Evaluation (PGE) to evaluate the general condition of the patient on an 8-point ordinal scale from 1 (very poor) to 8 (excellent).
Measured: Visit 2 (planned at 12 week, up to a maximum of 42 weeks)
Patient Satisfaction With Inhaler and Therapy at End of Observation Period
Patient satisfaction with inhaler and therapy at end of observation period according to a seven-point ordinal scale (ranging from very dissatisfied to very satisfied).
Measured: Visit 2 (planned at 12 week, up to a maximum of 42 weeks).
Number of Responders With Δ mMRC≥ 1
Number of responders with a change in modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) greater than or equal to 1 between visit 1 and 2. The mMRC was used to assess the severity of the breathlessness. the mMRC consists of five statements describing the patients grade of breathlessness ranging from 0 (best outcome) to 4 (worst outcome).
Measured: Baseline at Visit 1 (day 0) and Visit 2 (planned at 12 week, up to a maximum of 42 weeks).
Number of Responders With Δ CAT≥ 2
Number of responders with a change in the Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Assessment Test (CAT) greater than or equal to 2 between visit 1 and 2.
Measured: Baseline at Visit 1 (day 0) and Visit 2 (planned at 12 week, up to a maximum of 42 weeks).
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 May 2019
- Study start7 Jun 2019
- Primary completion30 Jun 2021
- Study completion30 Sep 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Pulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Boehringer IngelheimThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 469 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Boehringer Ingelheim
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Andrea Marseille, 0049613277141881, Study chair, andrea.marseille@boehringer-ingelheim.com
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03954132
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 1237-0087
- Status last verified
- Apr 2024
- First submitted
- 15 May 2019
- Last updated
- 24 Apr 2024
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: After the study is completed and the primary manuscript is accepted for publishing, researchers can use this following link https://www.mystudywindow.com/msw/datasharing to request access to the clinical study documents regarding this study, and upon a signed "Document Sharing Agreement". Also, Researchers can use the following link https://www.mystudywindow.com/msw/datasharing to find information in order to request access to the clinical study data, for this and other listed studies, after the submission of a research proposal and according to the terms outlined in the website. The data shared are the raw clinical study data sets.
Publications
Buhl R, Dreher M, Mattiucci-Guehlke M, Emerson-Stadler R, Eckhardt S, Taube C, Vogelmeier CF. EVELUT(R): A Real-World, Observational Study Assessing Dyspnoea and Symptom Burden in COPD Patients Switched from LABA/ICS to LAMA/LABA or LAMA/LABA/ICS. Adv Ther. 2023 Jul;40(7):3263-3278. doi: 10.1007/s12325-023-02524-y. Epub 2023 May 31.
PubMed 37256536Buhl R, Dreher M, Korn S, Taube C, Stock C, Zehendner CM, Kondla A, Vogelmeier CF. A Non-Interventional Study of Tiotropium/Olodaterol versus Any Triple Combination Therapy for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: The EVELUT(R) Study Protocol. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2020 Oct 22;15:2601-2608. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S262746. eCollection 2020.
PubMed 33122898
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Apr 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- EVELUT®: Assessment of Dyspnea and Other Symptoms as Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO) in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Symptomatic on LABA/ICS Maintenance Therapy (Now) Treated With Spiolto® Respimat® (Tiotropium/Olodaterol) in Comparison to Open or Fixed Triple Combination Treatment in Routine Clinical Practice
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03954132
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 1237-0087
- Conditions
- Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 469 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Boehringer IngelheimIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 7 Jun 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Jun 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Sep 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 17 May 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 15 Mar 2024
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Open-label comparative multicentric cohort study in COPD patients with LABA/ICS, switched to either tiotropium/olodaterol and observed for 12 weeks approximately.
Detailed description
COPD patients on LABA/ICS maintenance therapy with dyspnea (mMRC ≥ 1) and other symptoms (CATTM ≥ 10), who are switched to either Spiolto® Respimat® in the new reusable inhaler or any triple therapy (LAMA + LABA + ICS) as an open or fixed combination according to approved SmPCs at baseline at the discretion of their attending physician.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Spiolto® Respimat® | – | Drug: Spiolto® Respimat®Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) patients who were symptomatic (dyspneic) despite Long-acting beta2 adrenoceptor agonist/Inhalative Corticosteroids (LABA/ICS) maintenance treatment were switched to Spiolto® Respimat® inhaler by their attending physician in an real-world setting. |
| Triple-Therapy (LAMA/LABA/ICS) | – | Drug: Triple-Therapy (LAMA/LABA/ICS)Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) patients who were symptomatic (dyspneic) despite Long-acting beta2 adrenoceptor agonist/Inhalative Corticosteroids (LABA/ICS) maintenance treatment were switched to any triple therapy Long-acting muscarinic antagonist + Long-acting beta2 adrenoceptor agonist + Inhalative Corticosteroids (LAMA + LABA + ICS) by their attending physician in an real-world setting. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 40 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Study is based on newly collected data from approximately 900 COPD patients from 150 recruiting sites in Germany.
Key inclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Diagnosis of COPD
- Symptomatic (with regard to dyspnea (mMRC Dyspnea score ≥1) AND with regard to symptoms (CAT Score ≥10) at the same time)
- Patients on LABA/ICS maintenance therapy who are switched to Spiolto® Respimat® in the new reusable inhaler or a free/fixed triple combination of LABA + LAMA + ICS at Visit 1 at the discretion of the treating physician.
- Adults who are contractually capable and mentally able to understand and follow the instructions of the study personnel
- Male or female
Key exclusion criteria (15 listed)
- Patients with contraindications acc. to SmPC
- Patients not on LABA/ICS maintenance treatment at visit 1, e.g., mono or dual bronchodilation only, ICS only, or a triple combination of LAMA + LABA + ICS (either as a fixed combination product or as separate components)
- Lack of informed consent
- Pregnant and/or lactating females
- Acute exacerbation of COPD (within 4 weeks prior to Visit 1)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Spiolto® Respimat®Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) patients who were symptomatic (dyspneic) despite Long-acting beta2 adrenoceptor agonist/Inhalative Corticosteroids (LABA/ICS) maintenance treatment were switched to Spiolto® Respimat® inhaler by their attending physician in an real-world setting. | Drug | Spiolto® Respimat® |
| Triple-Therapy (LAMA/LABA/ICS)Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) patients who were symptomatic (dyspneic) despite Long-acting beta2 adrenoceptor agonist/Inhalative Corticosteroids (LABA/ICS) maintenance treatment were switched to any triple therapy Long-acting muscarinic antagonist + Long-acting beta2 adrenoceptor agonist + Inhalative Corticosteroids (LAMA + LABA + ICS) by their attending physician in an real-world setting. | Drug | Triple-Therapy (LAMA/LABA/ICS) |
Primary outcome
Change in Modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) Score Between Baseline and After End of Observation
Time frame: Baseline at Visit 1 (day 0) and Visit 2 (planned at 12 week, up to a maximum of 42 weeks).
Change in mMRC (modified Medical Research Council) score between baseline and after end of observation (ca. 12 weeks of treatment, Visit 2). The modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) scale is a 5-point (0-4) scale based on the severity of dyspnoea, where a 0 is the best possible score with no disability and 4 is the worst possible score representing the most severity. The mMRC will be used to assess the breathlessness state of the patient with just one question: "When do you experience dyspnoea?", covering five everyday activities, potentially leading to dyspnoea and giving an according rate of 0 to 4 points. The Minimum Clinically Important Difference (MCID) is a change of 1.0 point. Change calculated as Visit 1 - Visit 2.
Change in CATᵀᴹ (COPD Assessment Test) Score Between Baseline and After End of Observation (ca. 12 Weeks of Treatment)
Time frame: Baseline at Visit 1 (day 0) and Visit 2 (planned at 12 week, up to a maximum of 42 weeks).
The Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Assessment Test (CATᵀᴹ) was developed as a simple instrument to assess health status in patients with COPD. The CATᵀᴹ consists of eight items, each formatted as a semantic six-point differential scale, making the tool easy to administer and easy for patients to complete. These eight items cover cough, phlegm, chest tightness, breathlessness when going up hills/stairs, activity limitations at home, confidence leaving home, sleep and energy. Each item is scored from 0 to 5. Total CAT score is calculated as the sum over the 8 items, resulting in a total score ranging from 0 to 40, corresponding to the best and worst health status in patients with COPD, respectively. The Minimum Clinically Important Difference (MCID) is a change of 2.0 points. Change is calculated as Visit 1 - Visit 2.
5 secondary outcomes
Patients' General Condition According to the Physician's Global Evaluation (PGE) Score at Baseline
Time frame: Baseline at Visit 1 (day 0)
Patients' General Condition According to the Physician's Global Evaluation (PGE) Score at the End of the Observation Period
Time frame: Visit 2 (planned at 12 week, up to a maximum of 42 weeks)
Patient Satisfaction With Inhaler and Therapy at End of Observation Period
Time frame: Visit 2 (planned at 12 week, up to a maximum of 42 weeks).
Number of Responders With Δ mMRC≥ 1
Time frame: Baseline at Visit 1 (day 0) and Visit 2 (planned at 12 week, up to a maximum of 42 weeks).
Number of Responders With Δ CAT≥ 2
Time frame: Baseline at Visit 1 (day 0) and Visit 2 (planned at 12 week, up to a maximum of 42 weeks).
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Apr 2024.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37256536Buhl R, Dreher M, Mattiucci-Guehlke M, Emerson-Stadler R, Eckhardt S, Taube C, Vogelmeier CF. EVELUT(R): A Real-World, Observational Study Assessing Dyspnoea and Symptom Burden in COPD Patients Switched from LABA/ICS to LAMA/LABA or LAMA/LABA/ICS. Adv Ther. 2023 Jul;40(7):3263-3278. doi: 10.1007/s12325-023-02524-y. Epub 2023 May 31.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33122898Buhl R, Dreher M, Korn S, Taube C, Stock C, Zehendner CM, Kondla A, Vogelmeier CF. A Non-Interventional Study of Tiotropium/Olodaterol versus Any Triple Combination Therapy for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: The EVELUT(R) Study Protocol. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2020 Oct 22;15:2601-2608. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S262746. eCollection 2020.
- Related InfoLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. After the study is completed and the primary manuscript is accepted for publishing, researchers can use this following link https://www.mystudywindow.com/msw/datasharing to request access to the clinical study documents regarding this study, and upon a signed "Document Sharing Agreement". Also, Researchers can use the following link https://www.mystudywindow.com/msw/datasharing to find information in order to request access to the clinical study data, for this and other listed studies, after the submission of a research proposal and according to the terms outlined in the website. The data shared are the raw clinical study data sets.
Related trials for Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
Active, not recruiting
Symptoms and Functions in Patients With COPD and Chronic Bronchitis Switching From CIG to THS
COPD, Smoking
Not yet recruitingPhase 2/3
An Open-Label Extension Study to Evaluate Inhaled Treprostinil SMI in Participants With Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (PH-COPD)
Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Not yet recruiting
The Aim of the Study is to Decipher the Alterations in Signalling Pathways of Skeletal Muscle Stem Cells (Satellite Cells (SCs)) in Individuals With COPD, as Well as to Examine the Effect of Exercise Training on SCs.
COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease), Sarcopenia in Elderly
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Study of Treprostinil Administered Via Soft Mist Inhaler (SMI) in Participants With Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (PH-COPD)
Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Belumosudil Compared With Best Available Therapy in Participants Aged 12 Years or Older With Chronic Graft-versus-host Disease
Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Andrea Marseille, 0049613277141881 study chair
andrea.marseille@boehringer-ingelheim.com
75 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, run by Boehringer Ingelheim at 75 sites in Germany.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 15 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Apr 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 75 sites in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 15 Mar 2024). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in Modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) Score Between Baseline and After End of Observation (time frame: Baseline at Visit 1 (day 0) and Visit 2 (planned at 12 week, up to a maximum of 42 weeks).). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03954132, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Apr 2024.