Colorectal CancerNCT03954548
CB-17-08 Augmented Endoscopy System for Mucosal Lesion Detection During Colonoscopy for Colon Rectal Cancer.
A study testing CB-17-08 CADe in people with Colorectal Cancer, run by Cosmo Artificial Intelligence-AI Ltd at 10 sites in 3 countries.
Trial summary
The aim of this study is to assess the performance of the CB-17-08 to help endoscopists find potential mucosal polyps during the colonoscopy procedure, without significant noise disturbing the endoscopist attention, nor negative interference with the lesions detection than with the standard colonoscopy alone: the… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 45 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Colorectal Cancer
- What is being tested?
- CB-17-08 CADe
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 249 participants
- Where
- 10 sitesin 3 countries
- Study dates
- 17 Feb 2020to 7 May 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 45 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Male and female patients age: ≥45 years;
- Patients presenting to the endoscopy unit for a screening colonoscopy or a surveillance colonoscopy for CRC;
- Willingness to undergo tandem colonoscopies with and without the use of CB-17-08 on the same day and in the same procedural setting;
- Ability to provide written, informed consent and understand the responsibilities of trial participation;
Who cannot join
- The subject is pregnant or is planning a pregnancy during the study period;
- History of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD);
- History of colon resection;
- History of Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) syndrome or of Serrated Polyposis Syndrome (SPS);
- History of overt lower GI bleeding;
- History of colonic stricture;
Show all 10Show fewer
- History of radiation therapy to the abdomen or pelvis;
- Patients with contraindications to colonoscopy such as presence of acute diverticulitis or toxic megacolon;
- Subjects with particular symptoms (e.g diarrhea) who, per clinical practice, have to undergo random biopsies in the colon.
- Fecal Occult Blood Test (FOBT) or Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) positive patients will not be excluded from the study.
Trial locations and contacts
10 sites in 3 countries.
10 sites in 3 countries
United States7 sites
Geisinger Medical Center
Danville, California, 17822
Ascension St. John's Hospital
Detroit, Michigan, 48236
Mayo Clinic Eau Claire
Eau Claire, Wisconsin, 54703
Mayo Clinic Jacksonville
Jacksonville, Florida, 32224
Kansas City VA Medical Center
Kansas City, Kansas, 64128
Mayo Clinic La Crosse
La Crosse, Wisconsin, 54601
Mayo Clinic Scottsdale
Scottsdale, Arizona, 85259
United Kingdom2 sites
Queen Alexandra Hospital
Cosham, PO6 3LY
Oxford University Hospitals
Oxford, OX4 2PG
About this study
Official title: Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter, Tandem Study Evaluating the Safety and Effectiveness of the CB-17-08 Augmented Endoscopy System for the Detection of Mucosal Colorectal Polyps in Adult Patients Undergoing Screening or Surveillance Colonoscopy for CRC.
The aim of this study is to assess the performance of the CB-17-08 to help endoscopists find potential mucosal polyps during the colonoscopy procedure, without significant noise disturbing the endoscopist attention, nor negative interference with the lesions detection than with the standard colonoscopy alone: the study will investigate whether the use of the device provides an increase in the number of adenomas per colonoscopy as compared to standard colonoscopy. The study will also evaluate the safety of the CB-17-08, assessing if the use of the system increases the total number of excisions without a commensurate number of adenomas as compared to standard colonoscopy.
Read the detailed description
Study procedure:
Patients will be randomized (1:1) to one of the arms by an IWRS system. Randomization will be stratified by study endoscopist, to balance the number of patients randomized to either of the study groups (1:1) within the same endoscopist, by age (from to 45 to <65 years old; ≥65 years old) and by reason for colonoscopy (screening, surveillance <3 years from previous colonoscopy, surveillance 3-10 years from previous colonoscopy). Each endoscopist shall not enrol more than 90 patients.
The following study visits are foreseen for each patient:
Screening Visit A screening visit is performed at the investigational site. During this visit out-patients scheduled for colonoscopy will be informed about the aims, procedures, benefits and possible risks of the study prior to signing the informed consent form for inclusion in the study. Their medical history will be recorded as well as eventual clinical or laboratory examinations according to the local standard of care preparation for a colonoscopy, ) and the date for the colonoscopy procedure to be performed at the investigational site will be scheduled.
Tandem Colonoscopy Visit Each eligible patient returns to the clinic to undergo a same-day, back-to-back tandem colonoscopy examination performed by the same experienced endoscopist. The randomized allocation will determine whether patients will undergo standard high-definition white light colonoscopy with CB-17-08 immediately followed by standard high definition white light colonoscopy or standard high definition white light colonoscopy followed by standard high definition white light colonoscopy with CB-17-08.
Bowel preparation will be done according to the usual standard of care protocols of the individual sites. The quality of bowel preparation will be assessed during colonoscopy using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS). Sedation according to the sites best experience and standard procedures will be delivered to the patient by the endoscopist or an anaesthesiologist.
Subjects' vital signs (blood pressure [BP], hearth rate [HR] and oxygen saturation [SpO2]) will be measured and monitored prior to, during and at the end of the tandem colonoscopy procedure.
The endoscopist will be instructed to adhere to their usual withdrawal technique and to spend a minimum of 6 minutes withdrawing and examining the colonic mucosa. Time to reach the caecum and time to withdrawal from caecum to exit will be recorded for each colonoscopy. Clean withdrawal time, i.e. withdrawal time excluding the time spent for procedures or washings (if any), will be recorded. At least 6 minutes of clean withdrawal time will be required for all colonoscopies, in accordance to the current ASGE guideline. Withdrawal time, total procedure time, and time for pauses to allow polypectomies and biopsies to be performed will be recorded. Repeated examination of any of the colon segments (e.g. right colon) in normal modality or in retroflexion is not permitted.
Each colorectal polyp detected during the first procedure, as well as each polyp detected during the second procedure, will be immediately removed or biopsied and will be sent to the central histology laboratory for characterization. When a mucosal polyp is detected, its estimated size and morphological appearance according to Paris classification will be reported by the endoscopist on the CRF, as well as the anatomical location inside the colonic districts. On the basis of histological examination, polyps will be categorized according to revised Vienna classification and serrated lesion classification.
- Conditions
- Colorectal Cancer
- Being tested
- CB-17-08 CADe
- Medical subject headings
- Colorectal Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
CB-17-08 CADeDevice
CB-17-08 Augmented Endoscopy System with Computer Aided Detection (CADe) function
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| With CB-17-08 CADe | Experimental | Not described Receives: Device: CB-17-08 CADe |
| Without CB-17-08 CADe | No intervention | Not described |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Adenoma miss rate [AMR]
AMR, defined as the number of histologically confirmed adenomas and carcinomas detected during the second colonoscopy divided by the total number of histologically confirmed adenomas and carcinomas detected during the first and second colonoscopy combined.
Measured: Day 1
Secondary outcomes (1)
Polyp Miss Rate [PMR]
PMR, defined as the number of histologically confirmed polyps detected during the second colonoscopy divided by the total number of histologically confirmed polyps detected during the first plus second colonoscopy combined.
Diminutive (<5 mm) hyperplastic polyps of the rectosigmoid region will not be accounted for in the endpoint analysis.
Measured: Day 1
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 May 2019
- Study start17 Feb 2020
- Primary completion7 May 2021
- Study completion7 May 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Colorectal CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 249 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Cosmo Artificial Intelligence-AI Ltd
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03954548
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CB-17-08/03
- Status last verified
- May 2021
- First submitted
- 15 May 2019
- Last updated
- 12 May 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
Publications
Wallace MB, Sharma P, Bhandari P, East J, Antonelli G, Lorenzetti R, Vieth M, Speranza I, Spadaccini M, Desai M, Lukens FJ, Babameto G, Batista D, Singh D, Palmer W, Ramirez F, Palmer R, Lunsford T, Ruff K, Bird-Liebermann E, Ciofoaia V, Arndtz S, Cangemi D, Puddick K, Derfus G, Johal AS, Barawi M, Longo L, Moro L, Repici A, Hassan C. Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Miss Rate of Colorectal Neoplasia. Gastroenterology. 2022 Jul;163(1):295-304.e5. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2022.03.007. Epub 2022 Mar 15.
PubMed 35304117
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 May 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter, Tandem Study Evaluating the Safety and Effectiveness of the CB-17-08 Augmented Endoscopy System for the Detection of Mucosal Colorectal Polyps in Adult Patients Undergoing Screening or Surveillance Colonoscopy for CRC.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03954548
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CB-17-08/03
- Conditions
- Colorectal Cancer
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 249 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Cosmo Artificial Intelligence-AI LtdIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 17 Feb 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 7 May 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 7 May 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 17 May 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of this study is to assess the performance of the CB-17-08 to help endoscopists find potential mucosal polyps during the colonoscopy procedure, without significant noise disturbing the endoscopist attention, nor negative interference with the lesions detection than with the standard colonoscopy alone: the study will investigate whether the use of the device provides an increase in the number of adenomas per colonoscopy as compared to standard colonoscopy. The study will also evaluate the safety of the CB-17-08, assessing if the use of the system increases the total number of excisions without a commensurate number of adenomas as compared to standard colonoscopy.
Detailed description
Study procedure:
Patients will be randomized (1:1) to one of the arms by an IWRS system. Randomization will be stratified by study endoscopist, to balance the number of patients randomized to either of the study groups (1:1) within the same endoscopist, by age (from to 45 to <65 years old; ≥65 years old) and by reason for colonoscopy (screening, surveillance <3 years from previous colonoscopy, surveillance 3-10 years from previous colonoscopy). Each endoscopist shall not enrol more than 90 patients.
The following study visits are foreseen for each patient:
Screening Visit A screening visit is performed at the investigational site. During this visit out-patients scheduled for colonoscopy will be informed about the aims, procedures, benefits and possible risks of the study prior to signing the informed consent form for inclusion in the study. Their medical history will be recorded as well as eventual clinical or laboratory examinations according to the local standard of care preparation for a colonoscopy, ) and the date for the colonoscopy procedure to be performed at the investigational site will be scheduled.
Tandem Colonoscopy Visit Each eligible patient returns to the clinic to undergo a same-day, back-to-back tandem colonoscopy examination performed by the same experienced endoscopist. The randomized allocation will determine whether patients will undergo standard high-definition white light colonoscopy with CB-17-08 immediately followed by standard high definition white light colonoscopy or standard high definition white light colonoscopy followed by standard high definition white light colonoscopy with CB-17-08.
Bowel preparation will be done according to the usual standard of care protocols of the individual sites. The quality of bowel preparation will be assessed during colonoscopy using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS). Sedation according to the sites best experience and standard procedures will be delivered to the patient by the endoscopist or an anaesthesiologist.
Subjects' vital signs (blood pressure [BP], hearth rate [HR] and oxygen saturation [SpO2]) will be measured and monitored prior to, during and at the end of the tandem colonoscopy procedure.
The endoscopist will be instructed to adhere to their usual withdrawal technique and to spend a minimum of 6 minutes withdrawing and examining the colonic mucosa. Time to reach the caecum and time to withdrawal from caecum to exit will be recorded for each colonoscopy. Clean withdrawal time, i.e. withdrawal time excluding the time spent for procedures or washings (if any), will be recorded. At least 6 minutes of clean withdrawal time will be required for all colonoscopies, in accordance to the current ASGE guideline. Withdrawal time, total procedure time, and time for pauses to allow polypectomies and biopsies to be performed will be recorded. Repeated examination of any of the colon segments (e.g. right colon) in normal modality or in retroflexion is not permitted.
Each colorectal polyp detected during the first procedure, as well as each polyp detected during the second procedure, will be immediately removed or biopsied and will be sent to the central histology laboratory for characterization. When a mucosal polyp is detected, its estimated size and morphological appearance according to Paris classification will be reported by the endoscopist on the CRF, as well as the anatomical location inside the colonic districts. On the basis of histological examination, polyps will be categorized according to revised Vienna classification and serrated lesion classification.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, care provider, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| With CB-17-08 CADe | Experimental | Device: CB-17-08 CADe |
| Without CB-17-08 CADe | No intervention | – |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 45 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Male and female patients age: ≥45 years;
- Patients presenting to the endoscopy unit for a screening colonoscopy or a surveillance colonoscopy for CRC;
- Willingness to undergo tandem colonoscopies with and without the use of CB-17-08 on the same day and in the same procedural setting;
- Ability to provide written, informed consent and understand the responsibilities of trial participation;
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- The subject is pregnant or is planning a pregnancy during the study period;
- History of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD);
- History of colon resection;
- History of Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) syndrome or of Serrated Polyposis Syndrome (SPS);
- History of overt lower GI bleeding;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| CB-17-08 CADeCB-17-08 Augmented Endoscopy System with Computer Aided Detection (CADe) function | Device | With CB-17-08 CADe |
Primary outcome
Adenoma miss rate [AMR]
Time frame: Day 1
AMR, defined as the number of histologically confirmed adenomas and carcinomas detected during the second colonoscopy divided by the total number of histologically confirmed adenomas and carcinomas detected during the first and second colonoscopy combined.
1 secondary outcome
Polyp Miss Rate [PMR]
Time frame: Day 1
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 May 2021.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 35304117Wallace MB, Sharma P, Bhandari P, East J, Antonelli G, Lorenzetti R, Vieth M, Speranza I, Spadaccini M, Desai M, Lukens FJ, Babameto G, Batista D, Singh D, Palmer W, Ramirez F, Palmer R, Lunsford T, Ruff K, Bird-Liebermann E, Ciofoaia V, Arndtz S, Cangemi D, Puddick K, Derfus G, Johal AS, Barawi M, Longo L, Moro L, Repici A, Hassan C. Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Miss Rate of Colorectal Neoplasia. Gastroenterology. 2022 Jul;163(1):295-304.e5. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2022.03.007. Epub 2022 Mar 15.
Related trials for Colorectal Cancer
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Hepatic Artery Infusion of Carfilzomib in Participants With Liver Metastatic Disease Previously Treated With Hepatic Artery Infusion Pump Therapy
Colorectal Neoplasms, Neoplasms
RecruitingPhase 2
Toripalimab Plus Cetuximab and Irinotecan for Second-Line Right-Sided RAS/BRAF Wild-Type Advanced Colon Cancer Phase II Study
Colorectal Cancer (CRC)
Not yet recruiting
FLuorescent Angiography in REduction of Anastomotic Leak in Rectal Cancer Surgery
Rectal Cancer Patients, Rectal Cancer Surgery
Not yet recruiting
A Multicenter Randomized Open-Label Trial Evaluating ctDNA-Guided Interruption Versus Standard of Care Immune-Checkpoint Inhibitor (ICI) Therapy In Patients With Advanced / Metastatic Solid Tumors.
NSCLC (Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer), NSCLC (Non-small Cell Lung Cancer)
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
A Study to Learn About the Study Medicine Called PF-08165784 in People With PIK3CA-Mutated Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors
Advanced Breast Cancer, Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
10 sites in 3 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing CB-17-08 CADe in people with Colorectal Cancer, run by Cosmo Artificial Intelligence-AI Ltd at 10 sites in 3 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 May 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 10 sites in United States, United Kingdom, Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Adenoma miss rate [AMR] (time frame: Day 1). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03954548, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 May 2021.