Cerebral PalsyNCT03954808
Motor Imagery Training in Children With Unilateral Cerebral Palsy
A study testing Motor Imagery Training and Traditional physiotherapy in people with Cerebral Palsy, run by Abant Izzet Baysal University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
Motor imagery (MI) is a promising method to improve more cognitive aspects of motor behaviour, and may, thus, be effective for facilitating motor planning in children with Cerebral Palsy (CP). MI training facilitates the neural plasticity by enhancing the neuronal cortical pathways in brain. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 7 to 18 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Cerebral Palsy
- What is being tested?
- Motor Imagery Training and Traditional physiotherapy
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 51 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 1 Jun 2019to 1 Jul 2020
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 7 to 18 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult
Who may be able to join
- Diagnosis of Cerebral Palsy voluntary participation
- Age between 7-18 years, Children with Unilateral Cerebral Palsy
- With suitable cognitive state for training
- To attend a formal school
- GMFCS Level I-II
- IQ>70 Children with Unilateral Cerebral Palsy (from children's file)
- Mini-Mental State Exam For Children score above 24
Who cannot join
- Severe cognitive impairment and not able to follow task instructions
- IQ<70 Children with Unilateral Cerebral Palsy (from children's file)
- Who received motor imagery training last 6 months
- Severe Vision and hearing problems
- Botox or surgeries in the last 6 months
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
Bolu Abant Izzet Baysal University
Bolu, 14280
About this study
Official title: The Effect of Motor Imagery Training on Muscle Activity, Motor Imagery and Functional Movement Skills in Individuals Unilateral Cerebral Palsy
Motor imagery (MI) is a promising method to improve more cognitive aspects of motor behaviour, and may, thus, be effective for facilitating motor planning in children with Cerebral Palsy (CP). MI training facilitates the neural plasticity by enhancing the neuronal cortical pathways in brain. In children with CP, motor planning and MI capacity were found to be affected by studies. In the literature, there are studies about the evaluation of MI in Unilateral CP but there is insufficient number of studies included in MI in the rehabilitation program.
The aim of the study was to investigate the effect of motor imagery training for gait and lower extremity muscle activity (with EMG), functional capacity, quality of life, and time performance variables in Children with Unilateral CP.
The eligible participants will be allocated three groups, including motor imagery training group, traditional physiotherapy control group, and healthy control group. All the assessments will be performed before and after the training in the 8-week motor imagery training group and 6 weeks after the end of training. The participants in the control group will be evaluated with a 8-week interval and 6 weeks after the end of physiotherapy training. The healthy participants will be assessed only once. The motor imagery training will be designed for the individual basis with standard protocols. It will be applied two times a week for 8 weeks. All sessions will be performed in the clinic.
Read the detailed description
Unilateral CP and age matched healthy individuals will be participate the study between the ages of 7 and 18 years. Children's gross motor skills classified with GMFCS.
The control group individuals will be given a traditional physiotherapy two days per week for a total of 8 weeks (traditional physiotherapy session will last 45 minutes). Motor imagery training group will receive a traditional physiotherapy and motor imagery training within a specific program, two days a week for a total of 8 weeks (30 minutes traditional physiotherapy session+15 minutes MI training) .
Within the scope of MI training, individual training program will be determined by taking into consideration the needs of the individuals and the expectations for gait. The basic case of PETTLEP (Physical, Environment, Task, Timing, Learning, Emotion, Perspective) will be followed. MI training will be given individually with the same physiotherapist.
- Conditions
- Cerebral Palsy
- Being tested
- Motor Imagery Training, Traditional physiotherapy
- Keywords
- Unilateral Cerebral Palsy, Motor imagery,
- Medical subject headings
- Cerebral Palsy
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Motor Imagery TrainingOther
Motor imagery training will be designed for the individual basis with standard protocols
Traditional physiotherapyOther
Traditional physiotherapy within a specific program
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Motor imagery training group | Experimental | Children with Cerebral Palsy. Motor imagery training group will receive a traditional physiotherapy and motor imagery training within a specific program, two days a week for a total of 8 weeks (30 minutes traditional physiotherapy session+15 minutes MI training). The motor imagery training will be designed for the individual basis with standard protocols. All sessions will be performed in the clinic. Receives: Other: Motor Imagery Training |
| Cerebral Palsy control group | Active comparator | Children with Cerebral Palsy. Traditional physiotherapy control group individuals will be given a traditional physiotherapy two days per week for a total of 8 weeks (traditional physiotherapy session will last 45 minutes). Receives: Other: Traditional physiotherapy |
| Typically developing control group | No intervention | Age matched healthy individuals, with no treatment. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Movement Imagery Questionnaire-Children(MIQ-C)
Visual and Kinesthetic motor imagery ability will be evaluated with MIQ-C. Includes 12 items in total. The individual is asked to visualize four different movements from three different imagery perspectives. The clearness of the imagination is scored using a Likert-type scale between 1 (very difficult to feel) -7 (very easy to feel)
Measured: Change from Baseline at 8 weeks and 14 weeks
Mental Chronometry for Timed Up and Go Test
Motor imagery capacity will be evaluated by mental chronometry. This paradigm compares the duration between the actual movement and the imagined movement similar task duration. In this paradigm, participants are asked to do the Timed Up and Go test (TUG) and then they are asked to imaging the TUG. The timing of the imaging and actual movement will be determined by the stopwatch. Then compare the duration of actual and imagined movements. The temporal accuracy between actual and imagined movement will be calculated in terms of the delta time.
Measured: Change from Baseline at 8 weeks and 14 weeks
Secondary outcomes (16)
Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS)
Assessing severity of the disability and motor function. Gross motor functions of children with CP are classified in five levels with GMFCS. This is a classification system based on the child's self-initiated movements with emphasis on sitting, displacement and mobility.
Measured: At Baseline
Modified Tardieu Scale (MTS)
Assessing muscle tone of individuals. It evaluates reaction of the muscle to passive movement of limb both slow and fast speeds. This scale evaluated the speed-dependent nature of spasticity. Quality of muscle reaction (X) and the angle of muscle reaction (Y) are determined by the modified tardieu scale. If quality of muscle reaction score was 2 or higher, the joint angle in which the muscle responds with difficulty will be measured goniometer. The Modified Tardieu Scale scores range from 0 to 5. Scoring: 0= no resistance to passive movement. 1= slight resistance throughout the course of the passive movement. 2= there's a clear catching at a precise angle, which makes passive movement difficult, followed by a release. 3= fatigable clonus (Less than 10 seconds). 4= infatigable clonus (More than 10 seconds). 5= the joint cannot be moved.
Measured: Change from Baseline at 8 weeks and 14 weeks
Conner's Parent Rating Scale-Revised Short form (CPRS-RS)
Assessing whether individuals' levels of attention differ from between groups. The questionnaire consisted of 27 items and three sub-dimensions (Oppositionality, Hyperactivity, Cognitive Problems-Inattention). Response formats are in the form of a four-point Likert type scale. Answer options and scoring are as follows: 0 points are never correct, 3 points are very accurate, with total scores ranging from 0 to 81. Cognitive Problems-Inattention subscale has the minimum score is 0 and the maximum score is 18. Higher scores are reflective of worse situations of attention.
Measured: At Baseline
Mini-Mental State Exam For Children (Mmc)
Mini-Mental State Exam For Children (Mmc) consists of 15 questions designed to assess the cognitive functions of the individual. Includes recording, recall, attention and calculation, temporal orientation, spatial orientation, and language measurement. It takes about 15 minutes to perform.
Measured: At Baseline
Surface electromyography (sEMG)
Surface electromyography is a non-invasive method that involves taking, recording and interpreting the electric activity of muscle groups. Delsys Trigno Wireless System superficial EMG (sEMG) device will be used for evaluation of muscle activation. Measurements will be made in accordance with the criteria of SENIAM (surface EMG for non-invasive assessment of muscle) and the literature. Activation of lower extremity muscles through silver-silver chloride (Ag-AgCl) disposable adhesive electrodes will be evaluated.
Measured: Change from Baseline at 8 weeks and 14 weeks
Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI)
Assessing disability and activity and participation. 0: can not do, 1: can do in the form of scoring is done. At the end of the evaluation, the points of the related section are collected.
Measured: Change from Baseline at 8 weeks and 14 weeks
Pediatric Outcomes Date Collection (PODCI) (Questionnaire)
Assessing health-related quality of life, activity and participation. It consists of five basic sub-groups; upper extremity functions, physical function and sport, transfer and base mobility, pain, happiness / satisfaction.
Measured: Change from Baseline at 8 weeks and 14 weeks
Timed Up and Go Test
The Timed Up and Go test (TUG) is a simple test used to assess functional mobility, dynamic balance, walking speed and postural stability. The individual is asked to rise from chair, walk three meters safe and normal speed, turn around, walk back to the chair and sit down. The time is calculated in seconds from the start of the instruction to ends when the patient is seated.
Measured: Change from Baseline at 8 weeks and 14 weeks
10-Meter Walk Test
The individual is asked to walk the distance of 10 meter three times with the maximum speed that he or she wants can walk and the average time is recorded.
Measured: Change from Baseline at 8 weeks and 14 weeks
Five Times Sit to Stand Test
This test is associated with lower extremity muscle strength and balance. During the test, the individual is asked to stand up and sit for five times without holding up from the chair and the elapsed time is recorded.
Measured: Change from Baseline at 8 weeks and 14 weeks
Mental Chronometry for 10-Meter Walk Test
Motor imagery capacity is evaluated by mental chronometry. This paradigm compares the duration between the actual movement and the imagined movement similar task duration. In this paradigm, participants are asked to do the 10-Meter Walk Test and then they are asked to imaging the this test. The timing of the imaging and actual movement will be determined by the stopwatch. Then compare the duration of actual and imagined movements. The temporal accuracy between actual and imagined movement will be calculated in terms of the delta time.
Measured: Change from Baseline at 8 weeks and 14 weeks
Mental Chronometry for Five Times Sit to Stand Test
Motor imagery capacity is evaluated by mental chronometry. This paradigm compares the duration between the actual movement and the imagined movement similar task duration. In this paradigm, participants are asked to do the Five Times Sit to Stand Test and then they are asked to imaging the this test. The timing of the imaging and actual movement will be determined by the stopwatch. Then compare the duration of actual and imagined movements. The temporal accuracy between actual and imagined movement will be calculated in terms of the delta time.
Measured: Change from Baseline at 8 weeks and 14 weeks
Laterality Task
This task evaluates the left-right discrimination and implicit imagery. Two aspects will be evaluated in the task of recognition of the foot's laterality. First, the precision (percentage of right answers) of the discrimination of the laterality which is the capacity to recognize whether a part of the body belongs to the right or left and second the response time of the participants use in the discrimination task. NOI group designed and developed application about this will be used.
Measured: Change from Baseline at 8 weeks and 14 weeks
Functional muscle strength
The 30s Repetition Maximum test will be used to assess functional muscle strength of the lower extremities. The three closed kinetic chain exercises of lateral step-up test, sit to stand test, and attain stand through half knee test will be used.
Measured: Change from Baseline at 8 weeks and 14 weeks
Motor imagery entertainment scale
The entertainment level of motor imagery sessions and imagery training for individuals will be evaluated with a 0-10 point numerical rating scale (entertainment scale). There are numbers from 0 to 10 on the horizontal line of 10 cm. 0 "Not fun" on the line in the scale; 10 represents "a lot of fun". Entertainment rating will be recorded numerically from 0 to 10.
Measured: Change from Baseline at 4 weeks and 8 weeks
Motor imagery clarity scale
The clarity level of motor imagery sessions and imagery training for individuals will be evaluated with a 0-10 point numerical rating scale (clarity scale). There are numbers from 0 to 10 on the horizontal line of 10 cm.
On the horizontal 10 cm horizontal line, 0 means that the visualization never occurs, and 10 indicates that it is very clear. Clarity rating will be recorded numerically from 0 to 10.
Measured: Change from Baseline at 4 weeks and 8 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 May 2019
- Study start1 Jun 2019
- Primary completion1 Mar 2020
- Study completion1 Jul 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Cerebral PalsyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Abant Izzet Baysal UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 51 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Abant Izzet Baysal University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Demet Karabulut, Abant Izzet Baysal University
- Investigators
- Eylem T Yümin, Study director, Abant Izzet Baysal University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03954808
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- AbantIBU-FTR-DK-1
- Status last verified
- Oct 2020
- First submitted
- 16 May 2019
- Last updated
- 14 Oct 2020
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Steenbergen B, Craje C, Nilsen DM, Gordon AM. Motor imagery training in hemiplegic cerebral palsy: a potentially useful therapeutic tool for rehabilitation. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2009 Sep;51(9):690-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2009.03371.x.
PubMed 19709140Steenbergen B, Jongbloed-Pereboom M, Spruijt S, Gordon AM. Impaired motor planning and motor imagery in children with unilateral spastic cerebral palsy: challenges for the future of pediatric rehabilitation. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2013 Nov;55 Suppl 4:43-6. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.12306.
PubMed 24237279Lust JM, Wilson PH, Steenbergen B. Motor imagery difficulties in children with Cerebral Palsy: A specific or general deficit? Res Dev Disabil. 2016 Oct;57:102-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2016.06.010. Epub 2016 Jul 9.
PubMed 27399206
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 14 Oct 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Effect of Motor Imagery Training on Muscle Activity, Motor Imagery and Functional Movement Skills in Individuals Unilateral Cerebral Palsy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03954808
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- AbantIBU-FTR-DK-1
- Conditions
- Cerebral Palsy
- Keywords
- Unilateral Cerebral Palsy, Motor imagery,
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 51 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Abant Izzet Baysal UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jun 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Mar 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Jul 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 17 May 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Motor imagery (MI) is a promising method to improve more cognitive aspects of motor behaviour, and may, thus, be effective for facilitating motor planning in children with Cerebral Palsy (CP). MI training facilitates the neural plasticity by enhancing the neuronal cortical pathways in brain. In children with CP, motor planning and MI capacity were found to be affected by studies. In the literature, there are studies about the evaluation of MI in Unilateral CP but there is insufficient number of studies included in MI in the rehabilitation program.
The aim of the study was to investigate the effect of motor imagery training for gait and lower extremity muscle activity (with EMG), functional capacity, quality of life, and time performance variables in Children with Unilateral CP.
The eligible participants will be allocated three groups, including motor imagery training group, traditional physiotherapy control group, and healthy control group. All the assessments will be performed before and after the training in the 8-week motor imagery training group and 6 weeks after the end of training. The participants in the control group will be evaluated with a 8-week interval and 6 weeks after the end of physiotherapy training. The healthy participants will be assessed only once. The motor imagery training will be designed for the individual basis with standard protocols. It will be applied two times a week for 8 weeks. All sessions will be performed in the clinic.
Detailed description
Unilateral CP and age matched healthy individuals will be participate the study between the ages of 7 and 18 years. Children's gross motor skills classified with GMFCS.
The control group individuals will be given a traditional physiotherapy two days per week for a total of 8 weeks (traditional physiotherapy session will last 45 minutes). Motor imagery training group will receive a traditional physiotherapy and motor imagery training within a specific program, two days a week for a total of 8 weeks (30 minutes traditional physiotherapy session+15 minutes MI training) .
Within the scope of MI training, individual training program will be determined by taking into consideration the needs of the individuals and the expectations for gait. The basic case of PETTLEP (Physical, Environment, Task, Timing, Learning, Emotion, Perspective) will be followed. MI training will be given individually with the same physiotherapist.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Motor imagery training group | Experimental | Other: Motor Imagery TrainingChildren with Cerebral Palsy. Motor imagery training group will receive a traditional physiotherapy and motor imagery training within a specific program, two days a week for a total of 8 weeks (30 minutes traditional physiotherapy session+15 minutes MI training). The motor imagery training will be designed for the individual basis with standard protocols. All sessions will be performed in the clinic. |
| Cerebral Palsy control group | Active comparator | Other: Traditional physiotherapyChildren with Cerebral Palsy. Traditional physiotherapy control group individuals will be given a traditional physiotherapy two days per week for a total of 8 weeks (traditional physiotherapy session will last 45 minutes). |
| Typically developing control group | No intervention | –Age matched healthy individuals, with no treatment. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 7 to 18 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Diagnosis of Cerebral Palsy voluntary participation
- Age between 7-18 years, Children with Unilateral Cerebral Palsy
- With suitable cognitive state for training
- To attend a formal school
- GMFCS Level I-II
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Severe cognitive impairment and not able to follow task instructions
- IQ<70 Children with Unilateral Cerebral Palsy (from children's file)
- Who received motor imagery training last 6 months
- Severe Vision and hearing problems
- Botox or surgeries in the last 6 months
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Motor Imagery TrainingMotor imagery training will be designed for the individual basis with standard protocols | Other | Motor imagery training group |
| Traditional physiotherapyTraditional physiotherapy within a specific program | Other | Cerebral Palsy control group |
Primary outcome
Movement Imagery Questionnaire-Children(MIQ-C)
Time frame: Change from Baseline at 8 weeks and 14 weeks
Visual and Kinesthetic motor imagery ability will be evaluated with MIQ-C. Includes 12 items in total. The individual is asked to visualize four different movements from three different imagery perspectives. The clearness of the imagination is scored using a Likert-type scale between 1 (very difficult to feel) -7 (very easy to feel)
Mental Chronometry for Timed Up and Go Test
Time frame: Change from Baseline at 8 weeks and 14 weeks
Motor imagery capacity will be evaluated by mental chronometry. This paradigm compares the duration between the actual movement and the imagined movement similar task duration. In this paradigm, participants are asked to do the Timed Up and Go test (TUG) and then they are asked to imaging the TUG. The timing of the imaging and actual movement will be determined by the stopwatch. Then compare the duration of actual and imagined movements. The temporal accuracy between actual and imagined movement will be calculated in terms of the delta time.
16 secondary outcomes
Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS)
Time frame: At Baseline
Modified Tardieu Scale (MTS)
Time frame: Change from Baseline at 8 weeks and 14 weeks
Conner's Parent Rating Scale-Revised Short form (CPRS-RS)
Time frame: At Baseline
Mini-Mental State Exam For Children (Mmc)
Time frame: At Baseline
Surface electromyography (sEMG)
Time frame: Change from Baseline at 8 weeks and 14 weeks
Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI)
Time frame: Change from Baseline at 8 weeks and 14 weeks
Pediatric Outcomes Date Collection (PODCI) (Questionnaire)
Time frame: Change from Baseline at 8 weeks and 14 weeks
Timed Up and Go Test
Time frame: Change from Baseline at 8 weeks and 14 weeks
10-Meter Walk Test
Time frame: Change from Baseline at 8 weeks and 14 weeks
Five Times Sit to Stand Test
Time frame: Change from Baseline at 8 weeks and 14 weeks
Mental Chronometry for 10-Meter Walk Test
Time frame: Change from Baseline at 8 weeks and 14 weeks
Mental Chronometry for Five Times Sit to Stand Test
Time frame: Change from Baseline at 8 weeks and 14 weeks
Laterality Task
Time frame: Change from Baseline at 8 weeks and 14 weeks
Functional muscle strength
Time frame: Change from Baseline at 8 weeks and 14 weeks
Motor imagery entertainment scale
Time frame: Change from Baseline at 4 weeks and 8 weeks
Motor imagery clarity scale
Time frame: Change from Baseline at 4 weeks and 8 weeks
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 14 Oct 2020.
- Background: PubMed 19709140Steenbergen B, Craje C, Nilsen DM, Gordon AM. Motor imagery training in hemiplegic cerebral palsy: a potentially useful therapeutic tool for rehabilitation. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2009 Sep;51(9):690-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2009.03371.x.
- Background: PubMed 24237279Steenbergen B, Jongbloed-Pereboom M, Spruijt S, Gordon AM. Impaired motor planning and motor imagery in children with unilateral spastic cerebral palsy: challenges for the future of pediatric rehabilitation. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2013 Nov;55 Suppl 4:43-6. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.12306.
- Background: PubMed 27399206Lust JM, Wilson PH, Steenbergen B. Motor imagery difficulties in children with Cerebral Palsy: A specific or general deficit? Res Dev Disabil. 2016 Oct;57:102-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2016.06.010. Epub 2016 Jul 9.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Cerebral Palsy
Not yet recruiting
Feasibility of a Robot-Guided Active Play Intervention for Children With Cerebral Palsy
Cerebral Palsy
Recruiting
Additional Effects on tDCS With AOT on Lower Limb Functions on Children With Diplegic CP
Diplegic Cerebral Palsy
Recruiting
Sensory Integration Therapy vs Conventional Physical Therapy in Children With Mixed Cerebral Palsy
Cerebral Palsy
Active, not recruiting
Functional Outcomes and Control Using Synchron BCI - Australia
Neurologic Disorder, Neurologic Diseases
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Early Molecular Biomarkers for Differentiating Parkinsonian Syndromes
PARKINSON DISEASE (Disorder), Atypical Parkinsonism
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Eylem T Yümin study director
Abant Izzet Baysal University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Motor Imagery Training and Traditional physiotherapy in people with Cerebral Palsy, run by Abant Izzet Baysal University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Oct 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Movement Imagery Questionnaire-Children(MIQ-C) (time frame: Change from Baseline at 8 weeks and 14 weeks). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03954808, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Oct 2020.