AzTrials
AzTrials

Men Having Sex With Other MenChemsexNCT03956758

HIV Prevention During Chemsex

An observational study of Men Having Sex With Other Men, run by University Hospital, Montpellier.

Withdrawn

Withdrawn. The study stopped before anyone enrolled.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

In 2016, the number of discoveries of HIV seropositivity is estimated at about 6000 in France. Men who have sex with men (MSM) account for 44% of these infections (68% in the Occitanie region). For the past ten years, there have been new practices of sexual drug use among MSM referred to as Chemsex. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 years, men only
Conditions the study is for
Men Having Sex With Other Men
What is being tested?
Semi-directed interview
How many people
0 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
1 Apr 2019to 1 Apr 2019
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • Men only
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: MSM living in Montpellier with negative HIV status, having at least one sexual intercourse under drug use during the last 12 months

Who may be able to join

  • Men who have sex with men (MSM)
  • living in Montpellier
  • using chemsex drugs at least one during sexual intercourse

Who cannot join

  • under 18 years
  • seropositive HIV

About this study

Official title: The Reflexive Logics Structuring the Report to HIV Prevention of MSM Practicing ChemSex in the Context of Circulation of the PreP

In 2016, the number of discoveries of HIV seropositivity is estimated at about 6000 in France. Men who have sex with men (MSM) account for 44% of these infections (68% in the Occitanie region). For the past ten years, there have been new practices of sexual drug use among MSM referred to as Chemsex. These practices expose to sexual risks but also to those related to the consumption of drugs making this population more at risk to get infectious contaminations. In the "PREVAGAY study" conducted in Montpellier in 2015, about 30% of MSM included said they had consumed at least one psychoactive product before or during sex during the last 12 months. In addition, this percentage was significantly higher among HIV-positive men (51% versus 24% of HIV-negative men) and 1% (N = 9) had practiced Slam (Sexual Injection). The results of this study also showed that PreP (Prophylaxis Pre-exposure to HIV) was known by 52% of MSM included and 4% (N = 4) had already used it in the last 12 months. Several observations are needed: many ChemSex users do not use the PreP despite the fact that its effectiveness has been proven in many studies.

The social sciences have been studying the HIV epidemic since its emergence. In the era of HIV chronic disease, the sociologist Gabriel Girard wanted to question the pessimistic observation of epidemiological studies in his thesis work. Some contradictory logics explains this epidemiology of HIV which is maintained, particularly in Montpellier despite the arrival of the PreP.

The main objective of our study is to explore the reflexive logic structuring the report to HIV prevention by MSM practicing ChemSex in Montpellier, in the context of the appearance and dissemination of the PreP.

Being tested
Semi-directed interview
Keywords
MSM, Chemical sex, HIV prevention, HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Semi-directed interviewOther

    Semi-directed interview on ChemSex practice

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. report to HIV

    report to HIV contamination during Chemsex

    Measured: 1 day

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted21 May 2019
  2. Study start1 Apr 2019
  3. Primary completion1 Apr 2019
  4. Study completion1 Apr 2019

Why it stopped: Reclassification by Ethics Committee

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
0 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03956758
Sponsor's protocol ID
RECHMPL19_0233
Acronym
Chemsex
Status last verified
Nov 2019
First submitted
16 May 2019
Last updated
19 Nov 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided: NC

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Men Having Sex With Other Men, run by University Hospital, Montpellier.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Nov 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

report to HIV (time frame: 1 day). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Nov 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in