Prostate CancerNPV-MRI-02NCT03960112
Multicentric Evaluation of the True Negative Predictive Value of Multiparametric MRI for the Detection of Prostate Cancer Using Cystoprostatectomy Specimen as Reference
A study testing mpMRI in people with Prostate Cancer, run by Institut Paoli-Calmettes at 5 sites in France.
Trial summary
To evaluate the negative predictive value of mpMRI in the detection of prostate cancer using cystoprostatectomy specimen as the reference Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, men only
- Conditions the study is for
- Prostate Cancer
- What is being tested?
- mpMRI
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 12 participants
- Where
- 5 sitesFrance
- Study dates
- 13 Jun 2023to 23 Jun 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Men only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- age >18 years
- male patient scheduled for cystoprostatectomy as treatment of muscle invasive bladder cancer (clinical T2-T3, any N) or high risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (pT1 or CIS)
- no known diagnosis of prostate cancer
- no contraindication to undergo multiparametric MRI
- Signed written informed consent prior to any screening procedures being performed
- Patient affiliated to the ''National security'' regimen or beneficiary of this regimen
Who cannot join
- allergy against MR contrast media
- diagnosis or previous treatment of prostate cancer
- severe renal insufficiency (GFR <30ml/min)
- Bladder cancer infiltrating the prostate (T4)
- Pelvic metallic implants such as hip prosthesis
- Patients scheduled for cystoprostatectomy with prostate capsule sparing
- Patients unable to provide informed consent
- Patients having a prostate biopsy <6 month
Trial locations and contacts
5 sites in 1 country.
5 sites in 1 country
France5 sites
CHRU Hopital Edouard Herriot
Lyon, 69437
Institut Paoli Calmettes
Marseille, Bouches du Rhone, 13009
Hopital Nord
Marseille, 13020
Institut Mutualiste Montsouris
Paris, 75014
Chu Saint Etienne
Saint-Etienne, 42055
About this study
To evaluate the negative predictive value of mpMRI in the detection of prostate cancer using cystoprostatectomy specimen as the reference
Read the detailed description
To evaluate the negative predictive value of mpMRI in the detection of prostate cancer using cystoprostatectomy specimen as the reference
- Conditions
- Prostate Cancer
- Being tested
- mpMRI
- Keywords
- multiparametric MRI, cystoprostatectomy
- Medical subject headings
- Prostatic Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
mpMRIDevice
mpMRI in the detection of prostate cancer in a per patient analysis using cystoprostatectomy specimen
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| mpMRI | Experimental | mpMRI in the detection of prostate cancer in a per patient analysis using cystoprostatectomy specimen Receives: Device: mpMRI |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Negative predictive value of mpMRI in the detection of prostate cancer using cystoprostatectomy specimen as the reference
The true negative and false negative rates of mpMRI in the detection of prostate cancer in a per patient analysis using cystoprostatectomy specimen as a reference in patients with no previous diagnosis of prostate cancer.
Measured: From the date of mpMRI exam (Day-1) to the date pathology report of Day 0 surgery is obtained (an average of 7 days)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 May 2019
- Study start13 Jun 2023
- Primary completion23 Jun 2025
- Study completion23 Jun 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (11)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Prostate CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Institut Paoli-CalmettesThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Model description
- Per patient analysis in a prospective, multicenter cohort, open study.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 12 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Institut Paoli-Calmettes
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Jochen WALZ, MD, Principal investigator, Institut Paoli-Calmettes
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03960112
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NPV-MRI-02-IPC 2017-047
- Acronym
- NPV-MRI-02
- Status last verified
- Oct 2026
- First submitted
- 18 Sep 2018
- Last updated
- 14 Oct 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Moldovan PC, Van den Broeck T, Sylvester R, Marconi L, Bellmunt J, van den Bergh RCN, Bolla M, Briers E, Cumberbatch MG, Fossati N, Gross T, Henry AM, Joniau S, van der Kwast TH, Matveev VB, van der Poel HG, De Santis M, Schoots IG, Wiegel T, Yuan CY, Cornford P, Mottet N, Lam TB, Rouviere O. What Is the Negative Predictive Value of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Excluding Prostate Cancer at Biopsy? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis from the European Association of Urology Prostate Cancer Guidelines Panel. Eur Urol. 2017 Aug;72(2):250-266. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.02.026. Epub 2017 Mar 21.
PubMed 28336078N. Mottet JB, E. Briers, R.C.N. van den Bergh, M. Bolla, N.J. van Casteren, P. Cornford, S. Culine, S. Joniau, T. Lam, M.D. Mason, V. Matveev, H. van der Poel, T.H. van der Kwast, O. Rouvière, T. Wiegel. Guidelines on prostate cancer. European Association of Urology Web site https://uroweborg/guideline/prostate-cancer/. Accessed May 17, 2016.
Schoots IG, Petrides N, Giganti F, Bokhorst LP, Rannikko A, Klotz L, Villers A, Hugosson J, Moore CM. Magnetic resonance imaging in active surveillance of prostate cancer: a systematic review. Eur Urol. 2015 Apr;67(4):627-36. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.10.050. Epub 2014 Nov 15.
PubMed 25511988Le JD, Tan N, Shkolyar E, Lu DY, Kwan L, Marks LS, Huang J, Margolis DJ, Raman SS, Reiter RE. Multifocality and prostate cancer detection by multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging: correlation with whole-mount histopathology. Eur Urol. 2015 Mar;67(3):569-76. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.08.079. Epub 2014 Sep 23.
PubMed 25257029Branger N, Maubon T, Traumann M, Thomassin-Piana J, Brandone N, Taix S, Touzlian J, Brunelle S, Pignot G, Salem N, Gravis G, Walz J. Is negative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging really able to exclude significant prostate cancer? The real-life experience. BJU Int. 2017 Mar;119(3):449-455. doi: 10.1111/bju.13657. Epub 2016 Oct 4.
PubMed 27618134Ahmed HU, El-Shater Bosaily A, Brown LC, Gabe R, Kaplan R, Parmar MK, Collaco-Moraes Y, Ward K, Hindley RG, Freeman A, Kirkham AP, Oldroyd R, Parker C, Emberton M; PROMIS study group. Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study. Lancet. 2017 Feb 25;389(10071):815-822. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32401-1. Epub 2017 Jan 20.
PubMed 28110982Robertson NL, Hu Y, Ahmed HU, Freeman A, Barratt D, Emberton M. Prostate cancer risk inflation as a consequence of image-targeted biopsy of the prostate: a computer simulation study. Eur Urol. 2014 Mar;65(3):628-34. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.12.057. Epub 2013 Jan 3.
PubMed 23312572Wetterauer C, Weibel M, Gsponer JR, Vlajnic T, Zellweger T, Butikofer S, Muller G, Puschel H, Bachmann A, Gasser TC, Bubendorf L, Rentsch CA. Incidental prostate cancer prevalence at radical cystoprostatectomy--importance of the histopathological work-up. Virchows Arch. 2014 Dec;465(6):629-36. doi: 10.1007/s00428-014-1656-9. Epub 2014 Oct 1.
PubMed 25269630Bains LJ, Studer UE, Froehlich JM, Giannarini G, Triantafyllou M, Fleischmann A, Thoeny HC. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging detects significant prostate cancer with high probability. J Urol. 2014 Sep;192(3):737-42. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.03.039. Epub 2014 Mar 15.
PubMed 24641913Steinberg DM, Fine J, Chappell R. Sample size for positive and negative predictive value in diagnostic research using case-control designs. Biostatistics. 2009 Jan;10(1):94-105. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxn018. Epub 2008 Jun 12.
PubMed 18556677DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics. 1988 Sep;44(3):837-45.
PubMed 3203132
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 14 Oct 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Multicentric Evaluation of the True Negative Predictive Value of Multiparametric MRI for the Detection of Prostate Cancer Using Cystoprostatectomy Specimen as Reference
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03960112
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- NPV-MRI-02 / NPV-MRI-02-IPC 2017-047
- Conditions
- Prostate Cancer
- Keywords
- multiparametric MRI, cystoprostatectomy
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 12 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Institut Paoli-CalmettesUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 13 Jun 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 23 Jun 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 23 Jun 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 22 May 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
To evaluate the negative predictive value of mpMRI in the detection of prostate cancer using cystoprostatectomy specimen as the reference
Detailed description
To evaluate the negative predictive value of mpMRI in the detection of prostate cancer using cystoprostatectomy specimen as the reference
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
- Model description
- Per patient analysis in a prospective, multicenter cohort, open study.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| mpMRI | Experimental | Device: mpMRImpMRI in the detection of prostate cancer in a per patient analysis using cystoprostatectomy specimen |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Male only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- age >18 years
- male patient scheduled for cystoprostatectomy as treatment of muscle invasive bladder cancer (clinical T2-T3, any N) or high risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (pT1 or CIS)
- no known diagnosis of prostate cancer
- no contraindication to undergo multiparametric MRI
- Signed written informed consent prior to any screening procedures being performed
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- allergy against MR contrast media
- diagnosis or previous treatment of prostate cancer
- severe renal insufficiency (GFR <30ml/min)
- Bladder cancer infiltrating the prostate (T4)
- Pelvic metallic implants such as hip prosthesis
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| mpMRImpMRI in the detection of prostate cancer in a per patient analysis using cystoprostatectomy specimen | Device | mpMRI |
Primary outcome
Negative predictive value of mpMRI in the detection of prostate cancer using cystoprostatectomy specimen as the reference
Time frame: From the date of mpMRI exam (Day-1) to the date pathology report of Day 0 surgery is obtained (an average of 7 days)
The true negative and false negative rates of mpMRI in the detection of prostate cancer in a per patient analysis using cystoprostatectomy specimen as a reference in patients with no previous diagnosis of prostate cancer.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 14 Oct 2026.
- Background: PubMed 28336078Moldovan PC, Van den Broeck T, Sylvester R, Marconi L, Bellmunt J, van den Bergh RCN, Bolla M, Briers E, Cumberbatch MG, Fossati N, Gross T, Henry AM, Joniau S, van der Kwast TH, Matveev VB, van der Poel HG, De Santis M, Schoots IG, Wiegel T, Yuan CY, Cornford P, Mottet N, Lam TB, Rouviere O. What Is the Negative Predictive Value of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Excluding Prostate Cancer at Biopsy? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis from the European Association of Urology Prostate Cancer Guidelines Panel. Eur Urol. 2017 Aug;72(2):250-266. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.02.026. Epub 2017 Mar 21.
- BackgroundN. Mottet JB, E. Briers, R.C.N. van den Bergh, M. Bolla, N.J. van Casteren, P. Cornford, S. Culine, S. Joniau, T. Lam, M.D. Mason, V. Matveev, H. van der Poel, T.H. van der Kwast, O. Rouvière, T. Wiegel. Guidelines on prostate cancer. European Association of Urology Web site https://uroweborg/guideline/prostate-cancer/. Accessed May 17, 2016.
- Background: PubMed 25511988Schoots IG, Petrides N, Giganti F, Bokhorst LP, Rannikko A, Klotz L, Villers A, Hugosson J, Moore CM. Magnetic resonance imaging in active surveillance of prostate cancer: a systematic review. Eur Urol. 2015 Apr;67(4):627-36. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.10.050. Epub 2014 Nov 15.
- Background: PubMed 25257029Le JD, Tan N, Shkolyar E, Lu DY, Kwan L, Marks LS, Huang J, Margolis DJ, Raman SS, Reiter RE. Multifocality and prostate cancer detection by multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging: correlation with whole-mount histopathology. Eur Urol. 2015 Mar;67(3):569-76. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.08.079. Epub 2014 Sep 23.
- Background: PubMed 27618134Branger N, Maubon T, Traumann M, Thomassin-Piana J, Brandone N, Taix S, Touzlian J, Brunelle S, Pignot G, Salem N, Gravis G, Walz J. Is negative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging really able to exclude significant prostate cancer? The real-life experience. BJU Int. 2017 Mar;119(3):449-455. doi: 10.1111/bju.13657. Epub 2016 Oct 4.
- Background: PubMed 28110982Ahmed HU, El-Shater Bosaily A, Brown LC, Gabe R, Kaplan R, Parmar MK, Collaco-Moraes Y, Ward K, Hindley RG, Freeman A, Kirkham AP, Oldroyd R, Parker C, Emberton M; PROMIS study group. Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study. Lancet. 2017 Feb 25;389(10071):815-822. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32401-1. Epub 2017 Jan 20.
- Background: PubMed 23312572Robertson NL, Hu Y, Ahmed HU, Freeman A, Barratt D, Emberton M. Prostate cancer risk inflation as a consequence of image-targeted biopsy of the prostate: a computer simulation study. Eur Urol. 2014 Mar;65(3):628-34. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.12.057. Epub 2013 Jan 3.
- Background: PubMed 25269630Wetterauer C, Weibel M, Gsponer JR, Vlajnic T, Zellweger T, Butikofer S, Muller G, Puschel H, Bachmann A, Gasser TC, Bubendorf L, Rentsch CA. Incidental prostate cancer prevalence at radical cystoprostatectomy--importance of the histopathological work-up. Virchows Arch. 2014 Dec;465(6):629-36. doi: 10.1007/s00428-014-1656-9. Epub 2014 Oct 1.
- Background: PubMed 24641913Bains LJ, Studer UE, Froehlich JM, Giannarini G, Triantafyllou M, Fleischmann A, Thoeny HC. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging detects significant prostate cancer with high probability. J Urol. 2014 Sep;192(3):737-42. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.03.039. Epub 2014 Mar 15.
- Background: PubMed 18556677Steinberg DM, Fine J, Chappell R. Sample size for positive and negative predictive value in diagnostic research using case-control designs. Biostatistics. 2009 Jan;10(1):94-105. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxn018. Epub 2008 Jun 12.
- Background: PubMed 3203132DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics. 1988 Sep;44(3):837-45.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Prostate Cancer
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
Active, not recruitingObservational study
MRI Fusion Biopsy vs. Micro-Ultrasound Guided Biopsy
Prostate Cancer
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Natural History Study of Early Life Exposures in Agriculture (ELEA)
Prostate Cancer, Leukemia
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
STAR0602 With Nivolumab in Non Small Cell Lung Cancer and in Metastatic Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer, and STAR0602 Alone in Thymic Carcinoma
NSCLC, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Recruiting
Rehabilitation and Sex Therapy to Optimize Recovery After Prostate Cancer Treatment
Prostate Cancer, Urinary Incontinence
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jochen WALZ, MD principal investigator
Institut Paoli-Calmettes
5 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing mpMRI in people with Prostate Cancer, run by Institut Paoli-Calmettes at 5 sites in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 5 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Negative predictive value of mpMRI in the detection of prostate cancer using cystoprostatectomy specimen as the reference (time frame: From the date of mpMRI exam (Day-1) to the date pathology report of Day 0 surgery is obtained (an average of 7 days)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03960112, which also lists 11 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Oct 2026.