Laparoscopic NephrectomyWOFOR-N1NCT03960697
Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Nephrectomy Walk Out From Operating Room After Surgery
A study testing walk out from operating room in people with Laparoscopic Nephrectomy and Enhanced Recovery After Surgery, run by Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University at 2 sites in China.
Trial summary
Early mobilization is considered as an important strategy to enhance postoperative recovery. However, direct association between very early mobilization and improved recovery needs randomized control trials to prove. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Laparoscopic Nephrectomy, Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
- What is being tested?
- walk out from operating room
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 182 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesChina
- Study dates
- 4 Jun 2019to Aug 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age 18-65 Years old
- scheduled for laparoscopic partial nephrectomy or laparoscopic total nephrectomy.
- ASA grade I or grade II
Who cannot join
- Patients have severe cardiac diseases (cardiac function grading greater than grade 3/arrhythmia including sick sinus syndrome, atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, atrioventricular block, frequent ventricular premature, multiple ventricular premature, ventricular premature R on T, ventricular fibrillation and ventricular flutter/acute coronary syndrome) or respiratory failure or hepatic failure or renal failure;
- body mass index (BMI) ≥30 kg/m2
- Patients have diabetics or patients with gastric emptying disorders;
- Patients with poor blood pressure control (receive regular antihypertensive medical treatment but still have systolic blood pressure > 150 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure > 90 mmHg );
- Patients have schizophrenia, epilepsy, Parkinson's disease, mental retardation, or hearing impairment.
- Patients have thrombosis such as in lower extremity or in vena cava or in renal vein or in other veins.
Show all 10Show fewer
- Patients have neuromuscular disorders affecting lower limb activity, such as myasthenia gravis and cerebral infarction, which cause lower limb muscle weakness;
- Patients have contraindications for epidural puncture.
- Patients participate in other clinical trials.
- Patients refuse to sign informed consent for research.
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
China2 sites, 2 recruiting
- Recruiting
the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University
Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510655
SanQing Jin, MD, 0086-13719366863, sanqingjin@hotmail.com
Yang Zhao, MD
- Recruiting
The sixth affiliated hospital,Sun Yat-sen University
Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510655
SanQing Jin, 0086-13719366863, sanqingjin@hotmail.com
About this study
Official title: Effects of Walking Out From Operating Room on Postoperative Recovery of Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Total or Partial Nephrectomy
Early mobilization is considered as an important strategy to enhance postoperative recovery. However, direct association between very early mobilization and improved recovery needs randomized control trials to prove. This study proposes the program of walking out from operating room (WOFOR) after surgery, which means that encouraging patients to walk out from the operating room and return to the ward by walking under the condition of painlessness, clear consciousness and normal muscle strength of lower limb. The aim of this randomized controlled trial is to investigate the effect of WOFOR on the postoperative recovery of patients undergoing laparoscopic total and partial nephrectomy.
Read the detailed description
Postoperative bed rest increases the risk of complications such as thromboembolism and intestinal adhesion. Encouraging early mobilization after surgery should be important, although actual effects of early mobilization still need randomized control trails to prove. The aim of this randomized controlled trial is to investigate the effect of walking out from operating room (very early mobilization after surgery) on the postoperative recovery of patients undergoing laparoscopic total and partial nephrectomy.
A sample size of 91 patients in each group will be selected by a prior power analysis on the basis of the following assumptions: (1) an absolute reduction in the length of the hospital stay by 1 day, (2) standard deviation 2 days, (3) α=0.05, (4) power 90% and .(5) missed follow-up rate 5%.
Patients will receive written and verbal information about the trial before written consent is obtained. The randomization will take place before the day of the surgery and the patients will be assigned to either intervention (return to ward by walking) or control group (return to ward by lying on the transporting bed ). A stratified randomization with three factors including sex, disease character and age will be performed to ensure an even spread. The randomization is performed using concealed allocation where envelopes are prepared externally using a randomization list prepared by a statistician.
The patients will receive general anesthesia combined with epidural analgesia. After surgery, the patients will be evaluated whether fulfilling the criteria for mobilization including stable physiological parameters, consciousness, normal level of orientation and muscle strength, and painlessness every ten minutes. If patients fulfill the criteria, they will receive different methods of returning to the ward based on the grouping. In the control group, the patient will return to the ward by lying on the transporting bed. In the intervention group, the patients will be raised to a sitting position for five minutes. If the patients do not complain any discomfort and have stable physiological parameters, they will be encouraged to stand. If standing do not cause any discomfort, they will be encouraged to walk within the range of 5-meter long and 60-centimeter wide. If patients can walk within the range, they will return to the surgical ward by walking under the protection of medical staffs.
Then, all study patients will be subject to the same management such as the guidance of drink and diet recovery, the guidance of mobilization in the ward (the duration and distance of walking in the ward will be recorded every day), nutrition supplement after surgery, and the criteria of drainage removal and hospital discharge. The outcomes such as the length of hospital stay after surgery will be recorded and analyzed to evaluate the effects of walking out from the operating room. The analysis of Intention-to-treat and Per-protocol-sets will be both performed by statisticians.
- Being tested
- walk out from operating room
- Keywords
- early mobilization
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
walk out from operating roomBehavioural
After the surgery of laparoscopic total or partial nephrectomy, patients will be encouraged to walk out from the operating room and return to the ward by walking under the condition of stable physiological parameters, painlessness, clear consciousness and normal muscle strength of lower limb
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| walk out from operating room | Experimental | patients will return to the ward after surgery by walking Receives: Behavioral: walk out from operating room |
| leave operating room by transporting bed | No intervention | patients will return to the ward after surgery by lying on the transporting bed |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Length of hospital stay after surgery
hospital stay time from operation completion to actual hospital discharge,
Measured: at hospital discharge(expected 6 days after surgery)
Secondary outcomes (14)
Time to fufill the criteria of hospital discharge (recovery time)
The ideal time point for discharge, which is also considered as recovery time. The criteria for measuring recovery time included: 1) tolerance of diet and not necessary for intravenous nutrition; 2) analgesic-free, which is defined as visual analogue scale ≤3 without intravenous analgesic drugs, 3) adequate mobility; 4) afebrile status without major infectious complications
Measured: expected 6 days after surgery
The percentage of patients feeling ready for hospital discharge when they reach the discharge criteria.
The percentage of patients feeling ready for hospital discharge when they reach the discharge criteria.
Measured: expected 6 days after surgery
Re-admission incidence within 30 days after operation
Incidence of admit to hospital again within 30 days after operation
Measured: 30 days after operation
Postoperative recovery score using 40-item quality of recovery scoring system(QoR-40)
To evaluate the postoperative recovery using 40-item quality of recovery scoring system including emotional state (9 items), physical comfort (12 items), physical independence (5 items), psychologic support (7 items), and pain (7 items). Each item is graded on a five-point Likert scale, and global scores range from 40 (extremely poor quality of recovery) to 200 (high quality of recovery).
Measured: at 1-day, 2-day, 3-day, 4-day after surgery(up to 4 days after surgery)
Six-minute walking test
Physical capacity measured with the six-minute Walking test before surgery and after surgery.The longer walking distance in six minutes, the better physical capacity.
Measured: the day before surgery, and at 1-day, 2-day, 3-day, 4-day after surgery(up to 4 days after surgery
Anxiety score
Anxiety state evaluated by State-Trait Anxiety Inventory Form. The form used in this study is the Chinese version. The scales consist of 20 items; the responses range from 1 to 4 points (forced choice). The scores range from 20 (extremely low level of anxiety) to 80 (high level of anxiety). The STAI classifies anxiety into five stages: stages 1 and 2 suggest mild anxiety; stage 3 suggests moderate anxiety, and stages 4 and 5 suggest severe anxiety.
Measured: the day before surgery, and at 1-day, 2-day, 3-day, 4-day after surgery(up to 4 days after surgery
Postoperative pain score
Pain score after surgery is evaluated using a visual analogue scale 0-10 rated by the patients
Measured: at 1-day, 2-day, 3-day, 4-day after surgery(up to 4 days after surgery)
Severity of postoperative nausea and vomiting
Severity of postoperative nausea and vomiting is measured with the PONV intensity scale. Briefly, no PONV is defined as the absence of any emetic symptoms and nausea during the entire study period. Mild PONV is defined as the occurrence of mild nausea or one episode of vomiting if caused by an exogenous stimulus such as drinking or movement. Moderate PONV is reached when the patient vomits up to 2 times or experiences nausea that requires a rescue antiemetic therapy only once. Severe PONV is reached if the patient suffers more than two emetic episodes or needs more than one dose of a rescue antiemetic drugs.
Measured: at 1-day, 2-day after surgery(up to 2 days after surgery)
Time to first flatus after surgery
the time length between operation completion and the first flatus
Measured: at the time of first exhaust after surgery(expected average of 2 days after surgery)
Time to first defecation after surgery
the time length between operation completion and the first defecation
Measured: at the time of the first defecation after surgery(expected average of 3 days after surgery)
The volume of drainage after surgery
Total volume of drainage after surgery and drainage volume at 24-hour and 48-hour after the end of surgery.
Measured: expected average of 4 days after surgery
Time to the removal of drainage tube
recorded the time length between operation completion and the removal of drainage tube
Measured: at the time of drainage removal(expected average of 4 days after surgery)
Incidence of surgical complications within 30 days after surgery
Incidence of bleeding, wound infection, wound dehiscence within 30 days after surgery
Measured: 30 days after surgery
Incidence of major cardiovascular and cerebrovascular adverse events within 30 days after operation
Incidence of a complex event consisting of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke and emergency target vessel revascularization within 30 days after surgery
Measured: 30 days after surgery
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 May 2019
- Study start4 Jun 2019
- Primary completionAug 2023 (estimated)
- Study completionAug 2023 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (15)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Laparoscopic NephrectomyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 182 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, SanQing Jin, Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University
- Investigators
- SanQing Jin, MD, Principal investigator, Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03960697
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- SixthSunYatSen
- Acronym
- WOFOR-N1
- Status last verified
- Oct 2022
- First submitted
- 16 May 2019
- Last updated
- 1 Nov 2022
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Chughtai B, Abraham C, Finn D, Rosenberg S, Yarlagadda B, Perrotti M. Fast track open partial nephrectomy: reduced postoperative length of stay with a goal-directed pathway does not compromise outcome. Adv Urol. 2008;2008:507543. doi: 10.1155/2008/507543.
PubMed 18784846Karl A, Buchner A, Becker A, Staehler M, Seitz M, Khoder W, Schneevoigt B, Weninger E, Rittler P, Grimm T, Gratzke C, Stief C. A new concept for early recovery after surgery for patients undergoing radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: results of a prospective randomized study. J Urol. 2014 Feb;191(2):335-40. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.08.019. Epub 2013 Aug 19.
PubMed 23968966Barreca M, Renzi C, Tankel J, Shalhoub J, Sengupta N. Is there a role for enhanced recovery after laparoscopic bariatric surgery? Preliminary results from a specialist obesity treatment center. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016 Jan;12(1):119-26. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2015.03.008. Epub 2015 Mar 20.
PubMed 25892343Collins JW, Patel H, Adding C, Annerstedt M, Dasgupta P, Khan SM, Artibani W, Gaston R, Piechaud T, Catto JW, Koupparis A, Rowe E, Perry M, Issa R, McGrath J, Kelly J, Schumacher M, Wijburg C, Canda AE, Balbay MD, Decaestecker K, Schwentner C, Stenzl A, Edeling S, Pokupic S, Stockle M, Siemer S, Sanchez-Salas R, Cathelineau X, Weston R, Johnson M, D'Hondt F, Mottrie A, Hosseini A, Wiklund PN. Enhanced Recovery After Robot-assisted Radical Cystectomy: EAU Robotic Urology Section Scientific Working Group Consensus View. Eur Urol. 2016 Oct;70(4):649-660. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.05.020. Epub 2016 May 24.
PubMed 27234997Patel HR, Cerantola Y, Valerio M, Persson B, Jichlinski P, Ljungqvist O, Hubner M, Kassouf W, Muller S, Baldini G, Carli F, Naesheim T, Ytrebo L, Revhaug A, Lassen K, Knutsen T, Aarsaether E, Wiklund P, Catto JW. Enhanced recovery after surgery: are we ready, and can we afford not to implement these pathways for patients undergoing radical cystectomy? Eur Urol. 2014 Feb;65(2):263-6. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.10.011. Epub 2013 Oct 22.
PubMed 24183418Palumbo V, Giannarini G, Crestani A, Rossanese M, Calandriello M, Ficarra V. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Pathway in Patients Undergoing Open Radical Cystectomy Is Safe and Accelerates Bowel Function Recovery. Urology. 2018 May;115:125-132. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2018.01.043. Epub 2018 Feb 15.
PubMed 29454972Azhar RA, Bochner B, Catto J, Goh AC, Kelly J, Patel HD, Pruthi RS, Thalmann GN, Desai M. Enhanced Recovery after Urological Surgery: A Contemporary Systematic Review of Outcomes, Key Elements, and Research Needs. Eur Urol. 2016 Jul;70(1):176-187. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.02.051. Epub 2016 Mar 9.
PubMed 26970912Tyson MD, Chang SS. Enhanced Recovery Pathways Versus Standard Care After Cystectomy: A Meta-analysis of the Effect on Perioperative Outcomes. Eur Urol. 2016 Dec;70(6):995-1003. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.05.031. Epub 2016 Jun 11.
PubMed 27297680Cerantola Y, Valerio M, Persson B, Jichlinski P, Ljungqvist O, Hubner M, Kassouf W, Muller S, Baldini G, Carli F, Naesheimh T, Ytrebo L, Revhaug A, Lassen K, Knutsen T, Aarsether E, Wiklund P, Patel HR. Guidelines for perioperative care after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS((R))) society recommendations. Clin Nutr. 2013 Dec;32(6):879-87. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2013.09.014. Epub 2013 Oct 17.
PubMed 24189391Semerjian A, Milbar N, Kates M, Gorin MA, Patel HD, Chalfin HJ, Frank SM, Wu CL, Yang WW, Hobson D, Robertson L, Wick E, Schoenberg MP, Pierorazio PM, Johnson MH, Stimson CJ, Bivalacqua TJ. Hospital Charges and Length of Stay Following Radical Cystectomy in the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Era. Urology. 2018 Jan;111:86-91. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2017.09.010. Epub 2017 Oct 13.
PubMed 29032237Sugi M, Matsuda T, Yoshida T, Taniguchi H, Mishima T, Yanishi M, Komai Y, Yasuda K, Kinoshita H, Yoshida K, Watanabe M. Introduction of an Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Protocol for Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy. Urol Int. 2017;99(2):194-200. doi: 10.1159/000457805. Epub 2017 Feb 17.
PubMed 28222423Lee TG, Kang SB, Kim DW, Hong S, Heo SC, Park KJ. Comparison of early mobilization and diet rehabilitation program with conventional care after laparoscopic colon surgery: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Dis Colon Rectum. 2011 Jan;54(1):21-8. doi: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181fcdb3e.
PubMed 21160309van der Leeden M, Huijsmans R, Geleijn E, de Lange-de Klerk ES, Dekker J, Bonjer HJ, van der Peet DL. Early enforced mobilisation following surgery for gastrointestinal cancer: feasibility and outcomes. Physiotherapy. 2016 Mar;102(1):103-10. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2015.03.3722. Epub 2015 May 7.
PubMed 26059985Ni CY, Wang ZH, Huang ZP, Zhou H, Fu LJ, Cai H, Huang XX, Yang Y, Li HF, Zhou WP. Early enforced mobilization after liver resection: A prospective randomized controlled trial. Int J Surg. 2018 Jun;54(Pt A):254-258. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.04.060. Epub 2018 May 9.
PubMed 29753000da Costa Torres D, Dos Santos PM, Reis HJ, Paisani DM, Chiavegato LD. Effectiveness of an early mobilization program on functional capacity after coronary artery bypass surgery: A randomized controlled trial protocol. SAGE Open Med. 2016 Dec 14;4:2050312116682256. doi: 10.1177/2050312116682256. eCollection 2016.
PubMed 28348739
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Nov 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effects of Walking Out From Operating Room on Postoperative Recovery of Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Total or Partial Nephrectomy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03960697
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- WOFOR-N1 / SixthSunYatSen
- Keywords
- early mobilization
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 182 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 4 Jun 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Aug 2023 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Aug 2023 (estimated)
- First posted
- 23 May 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Early mobilization is considered as an important strategy to enhance postoperative recovery. However, direct association between very early mobilization and improved recovery needs randomized control trials to prove. This study proposes the program of walking out from operating room (WOFOR) after surgery, which means that encouraging patients to walk out from the operating room and return to the ward by walking under the condition of painlessness, clear consciousness and normal muscle strength of lower limb. The aim of this randomized controlled trial is to investigate the effect of WOFOR on the postoperative recovery of patients undergoing laparoscopic total and partial nephrectomy.
Detailed description
Postoperative bed rest increases the risk of complications such as thromboembolism and intestinal adhesion. Encouraging early mobilization after surgery should be important, although actual effects of early mobilization still need randomized control trails to prove. The aim of this randomized controlled trial is to investigate the effect of walking out from operating room (very early mobilization after surgery) on the postoperative recovery of patients undergoing laparoscopic total and partial nephrectomy.
A sample size of 91 patients in each group will be selected by a prior power analysis on the basis of the following assumptions: (1) an absolute reduction in the length of the hospital stay by 1 day, (2) standard deviation 2 days, (3) α=0.05, (4) power 90% and .(5) missed follow-up rate 5%.
Patients will receive written and verbal information about the trial before written consent is obtained. The randomization will take place before the day of the surgery and the patients will be assigned to either intervention (return to ward by walking) or control group (return to ward by lying on the transporting bed ). A stratified randomization with three factors including sex, disease character and age will be performed to ensure an even spread. The randomization is performed using concealed allocation where envelopes are prepared externally using a randomization list prepared by a statistician.
The patients will receive general anesthesia combined with epidural analgesia. After surgery, the patients will be evaluated whether fulfilling the criteria for mobilization including stable physiological parameters, consciousness, normal level of orientation and muscle strength, and painlessness every ten minutes. If patients fulfill the criteria, they will receive different methods of returning to the ward based on the grouping. In the control group, the patient will return to the ward by lying on the transporting bed. In the intervention group, the patients will be raised to a sitting position for five minutes. If the patients do not complain any discomfort and have stable physiological parameters, they will be encouraged to stand. If standing do not cause any discomfort, they will be encouraged to walk within the range of 5-meter long and 60-centimeter wide. If patients can walk within the range, they will return to the surgical ward by walking under the protection of medical staffs.
Then, all study patients will be subject to the same management such as the guidance of drink and diet recovery, the guidance of mobilization in the ward (the duration and distance of walking in the ward will be recorded every day), nutrition supplement after surgery, and the criteria of drainage removal and hospital discharge. The outcomes such as the length of hospital stay after surgery will be recorded and analyzed to evaluate the effects of walking out from the operating room. The analysis of Intention-to-treat and Per-protocol-sets will be both performed by statisticians.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| walk out from operating room | Experimental | Behavioral: walk out from operating roompatients will return to the ward after surgery by walking |
| leave operating room by transporting bed | No intervention | –patients will return to the ward after surgery by lying on the transporting bed |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Age 18-65 Years old
- scheduled for laparoscopic partial nephrectomy or laparoscopic total nephrectomy.
- ASA grade I or grade II
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Patients have severe cardiac diseases (cardiac function grading greater than grade 3/arrhythmia including sick sinus syndrome, atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, atrioventricular block, frequent ventricular premature, multiple ventricular premature, ventricular premature R on T, ventricular fibrillation and ventricular flutter/acute coronary syndrome) or respiratory failure or hepatic failure or renal failure;
- body mass index (BMI) ≥30 kg/m2
- Patients have diabetics or patients with gastric emptying disorders;
- Patients with poor blood pressure control (receive regular antihypertensive medical treatment but still have systolic blood pressure > 150 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure > 90 mmHg );
- Patients have schizophrenia, epilepsy, Parkinson's disease, mental retardation, or hearing impairment.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| walk out from operating roomAfter the surgery of laparoscopic total or partial nephrectomy, patients will be encouraged to walk out from the operating room and return to the ward by walking under the condition of stable physiological parameters, painlessness, clear consciousness and normal muscle strength of lower limb | Behavioural | walk out from operating room |
Primary outcome
Length of hospital stay after surgery
Time frame: at hospital discharge(expected 6 days after surgery)
hospital stay time from operation completion to actual hospital discharge,
14 secondary outcomes
Time to fufill the criteria of hospital discharge (recovery time)
Time frame: expected 6 days after surgery
The percentage of patients feeling ready for hospital discharge when they reach the discharge criteria.
Time frame: expected 6 days after surgery
Re-admission incidence within 30 days after operation
Time frame: 30 days after operation
Postoperative recovery score using 40-item quality of recovery scoring system(QoR-40)
Time frame: at 1-day, 2-day, 3-day, 4-day after surgery(up to 4 days after surgery)
Six-minute walking test
Time frame: the day before surgery, and at 1-day, 2-day, 3-day, 4-day after surgery(up to 4 days after surgery
Anxiety score
Time frame: the day before surgery, and at 1-day, 2-day, 3-day, 4-day after surgery(up to 4 days after surgery
Postoperative pain score
Time frame: at 1-day, 2-day, 3-day, 4-day after surgery(up to 4 days after surgery)
Severity of postoperative nausea and vomiting
Time frame: at 1-day, 2-day after surgery(up to 2 days after surgery)
Time to first flatus after surgery
Time frame: at the time of first exhaust after surgery(expected average of 2 days after surgery)
Time to first defecation after surgery
Time frame: at the time of the first defecation after surgery(expected average of 3 days after surgery)
The volume of drainage after surgery
Time frame: expected average of 4 days after surgery
Time to the removal of drainage tube
Time frame: at the time of drainage removal(expected average of 4 days after surgery)
Incidence of surgical complications within 30 days after surgery
Time frame: 30 days after surgery
Incidence of major cardiovascular and cerebrovascular adverse events within 30 days after operation
Time frame: 30 days after surgery
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Nov 2022.
- Background: PubMed 18784846Chughtai B, Abraham C, Finn D, Rosenberg S, Yarlagadda B, Perrotti M. Fast track open partial nephrectomy: reduced postoperative length of stay with a goal-directed pathway does not compromise outcome. Adv Urol. 2008;2008:507543. doi: 10.1155/2008/507543.
- Background: PubMed 23968966Karl A, Buchner A, Becker A, Staehler M, Seitz M, Khoder W, Schneevoigt B, Weninger E, Rittler P, Grimm T, Gratzke C, Stief C. A new concept for early recovery after surgery for patients undergoing radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: results of a prospective randomized study. J Urol. 2014 Feb;191(2):335-40. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.08.019. Epub 2013 Aug 19.
- Background: PubMed 25892343Barreca M, Renzi C, Tankel J, Shalhoub J, Sengupta N. Is there a role for enhanced recovery after laparoscopic bariatric surgery? Preliminary results from a specialist obesity treatment center. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016 Jan;12(1):119-26. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2015.03.008. Epub 2015 Mar 20.
- Background: PubMed 27234997Collins JW, Patel H, Adding C, Annerstedt M, Dasgupta P, Khan SM, Artibani W, Gaston R, Piechaud T, Catto JW, Koupparis A, Rowe E, Perry M, Issa R, McGrath J, Kelly J, Schumacher M, Wijburg C, Canda AE, Balbay MD, Decaestecker K, Schwentner C, Stenzl A, Edeling S, Pokupic S, Stockle M, Siemer S, Sanchez-Salas R, Cathelineau X, Weston R, Johnson M, D'Hondt F, Mottrie A, Hosseini A, Wiklund PN. Enhanced Recovery After Robot-assisted Radical Cystectomy: EAU Robotic Urology Section Scientific Working Group Consensus View. Eur Urol. 2016 Oct;70(4):649-660. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.05.020. Epub 2016 May 24.
- Background: PubMed 24183418Patel HR, Cerantola Y, Valerio M, Persson B, Jichlinski P, Ljungqvist O, Hubner M, Kassouf W, Muller S, Baldini G, Carli F, Naesheim T, Ytrebo L, Revhaug A, Lassen K, Knutsen T, Aarsaether E, Wiklund P, Catto JW. Enhanced recovery after surgery: are we ready, and can we afford not to implement these pathways for patients undergoing radical cystectomy? Eur Urol. 2014 Feb;65(2):263-6. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.10.011. Epub 2013 Oct 22.
- Background: PubMed 29454972Palumbo V, Giannarini G, Crestani A, Rossanese M, Calandriello M, Ficarra V. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Pathway in Patients Undergoing Open Radical Cystectomy Is Safe and Accelerates Bowel Function Recovery. Urology. 2018 May;115:125-132. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2018.01.043. Epub 2018 Feb 15.
- Background: PubMed 26970912Azhar RA, Bochner B, Catto J, Goh AC, Kelly J, Patel HD, Pruthi RS, Thalmann GN, Desai M. Enhanced Recovery after Urological Surgery: A Contemporary Systematic Review of Outcomes, Key Elements, and Research Needs. Eur Urol. 2016 Jul;70(1):176-187. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.02.051. Epub 2016 Mar 9.
- Background: PubMed 27297680Tyson MD, Chang SS. Enhanced Recovery Pathways Versus Standard Care After Cystectomy: A Meta-analysis of the Effect on Perioperative Outcomes. Eur Urol. 2016 Dec;70(6):995-1003. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.05.031. Epub 2016 Jun 11.
- Background: PubMed 24189391Cerantola Y, Valerio M, Persson B, Jichlinski P, Ljungqvist O, Hubner M, Kassouf W, Muller S, Baldini G, Carli F, Naesheimh T, Ytrebo L, Revhaug A, Lassen K, Knutsen T, Aarsether E, Wiklund P, Patel HR. Guidelines for perioperative care after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS((R))) society recommendations. Clin Nutr. 2013 Dec;32(6):879-87. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2013.09.014. Epub 2013 Oct 17.
- Background: PubMed 29032237Semerjian A, Milbar N, Kates M, Gorin MA, Patel HD, Chalfin HJ, Frank SM, Wu CL, Yang WW, Hobson D, Robertson L, Wick E, Schoenberg MP, Pierorazio PM, Johnson MH, Stimson CJ, Bivalacqua TJ. Hospital Charges and Length of Stay Following Radical Cystectomy in the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Era. Urology. 2018 Jan;111:86-91. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2017.09.010. Epub 2017 Oct 13.
- Background: PubMed 28222423Sugi M, Matsuda T, Yoshida T, Taniguchi H, Mishima T, Yanishi M, Komai Y, Yasuda K, Kinoshita H, Yoshida K, Watanabe M. Introduction of an Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Protocol for Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy. Urol Int. 2017;99(2):194-200. doi: 10.1159/000457805. Epub 2017 Feb 17.
- Background: PubMed 21160309Lee TG, Kang SB, Kim DW, Hong S, Heo SC, Park KJ. Comparison of early mobilization and diet rehabilitation program with conventional care after laparoscopic colon surgery: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Dis Colon Rectum. 2011 Jan;54(1):21-8. doi: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181fcdb3e.
Related trials for Laparoscopic Nephrectomy
RecruitingObservational study
ESP Block vs. EXORA Block for Postoperative Pain in Nephrectomy
Postoperative Pain, Nephrectomy
Not yet recruiting
PQLB vs TFPB in HALDN
Analgesia, Donor Nephrectomy
Recruiting
The Effect of Hyperoxia on Ventilation During Recovery From General Anesthesia
Ventilatory Depression, Postoperative Respiratory Failure
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Risk of Scrotal Hydroceles After Nephrectomy For Kidney Cancer
Hydrocele, Hydrocele of Tunica Vaginalis
Active, not recruiting
The Effect of Quadratus Lumborum (QL) Block on the Incidence of Chronic Neuropathic Pain After Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy: A Study on Neuroinflammation and Neurophysiology
Chronic Pain, Living Kidney Donor
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
SanQing Jin, MD principal investigator
Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing walk out from operating room in people with Laparoscopic Nephrectomy and Enhanced Recovery After Surgery, run by Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University at 2 sites in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Nov 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact SanQing Jin, MD (0086-13719366863, sanqingjin@hotmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Length of hospital stay after surgery (time frame: at hospital discharge(expected 6 days after surgery)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03960697, which also lists 15 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Nov 2022.